The validity of single-item measures of health-related quality of life across groups differing in acute respiratory symptom severity.

PURPOSE: Practical considerations precluding health-related quality of life (HRQOL) monitoring in population and clinical research have spawned development of improved items for more brief surveys of frequently measured HRQOL outcomes. The aim of this study was to validate the use of the Quality of Life General (QGEN-8), a shorter 8-item alternative to the longer 36-item short form (SF)-36 Health Survey for measuring the same eight HRQOL domains across groups of adults with varying severity of acute respiratory symptoms, such as cough and sore throat. METHODS: National Opinion Research Center (NORC) representative probability (N = 1,648) and supplemental opt-in (N = 5,915) U.S. adult samples were surveyed cross-sectionally online in 2020. Parallel analyses compared QGEN-8 and SF-36 estimates of group means for each of eight matching profile domains and summary physical and mental scores across groups differing in severity of acute symptoms and chronic respiratory conditions using analysis of covariance (ANCOVAs) controlling for socio-demographics and presence of chronic respiratory conditions. RESULTS: In support of discriminant validity, ANCOVA estimates of QGEN-8 means with SF-36 estimates revealed the same patterns of declining HRQOL with the presence and increasing severity of symptoms and chronic condition severity. CONCLUSION: QGEN-8® shows satisfactory validity and warrants further testing in cross-sectional and longitudinal population and clinical survey research as a more practical method for estimating group differences in SF-36 profile and summary component HRQOL scores.

Upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) with symptoms such as cough and sore throat are highly prevalent and negatively impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Existing instruments that comprehensively measure HRQOL are lengthy, potentially increasing respondent burden and restricting their use in clinical studies and research. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether eight newly constructed survey items, the QGEN-8®, measure the same HRQOL outcomes as the 36-item SF-36 Health Survey well enough to serve as a more practical alternative for purposes of detecting the physical and mental HRQOL effects on differing severity of acute URTI symptoms, specifically cough and sore throat. The results showed that the QGEN-8® was psychometrically sound and able to differentiate between different levels of URTI symptoms, even in cases where respondents had chronic respiratory conditions. This indicates that the briefer QGEN-8® with 75% shorter response time is able to provide HRQOL measurements comparable to those derived from lengthier instruments thereby lending itself more readily to use in clinical studies and research of URTI symptoms, such as cough and sore throat.

The Association Between Physical Distancing Behaviors to Avoid COVID-19 and Health-Related Quality of Life in Immunocompromised and Nonimmunocompromised Individuals: Patient-Informed Protocol for the Observational, Cross-Sectional EAGLE Study.

BACKGROUND: Immunocompromised individuals are known to respond inadequately to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, placing them at high risk of severe or fatal COVID-19. Thus, immunocompromised individuals and their caregivers may still practice varying degrees of social or physical distancing to avoid COVID-19. However, the association between physical distancing to avoid COVID-19 and quality of life has not been comprehensively evaluated in any study. OBJECTIVE: We aim to measure physical distancing behaviors among immunocompromised individuals and the association between those behaviors and person-centric outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures, health state utilities, anxiety and depression, and work and school productivity impairment. METHODS: A patient-informed protocol was developed to conduct the EAGLE Study, a large cross-sectional, observational study, and this paper describes that protocol. EAGLE is designed to measure distancing behaviors and outcomes in immunocompromised individuals, including children (aged ≥6 mo) and their caregivers, and nonimmunocompromised adults in the United States and United Kingdom who report no receipt of passive immunization against COVID-19. We previously developed a novel self- and observer-reported instrument, the Physical Distancing Scale for COVID-19 Avoidance (PDS-C19), to measure physical distancing behavior levels cross-sectionally and retrospectively. Using an interim or a randomly selected subset of the study population, the PDS-C19 psychometric properties will be assessed, including structural validity, internal consistency, known-group validity, and convergent validity. Associations (correlations) will be assessed between the PDS-C19 and validated HRQoL-related measures and utilities. Structural equation modeling and regression will be used to assess these associations, adjusting for potential confounders. Participant recruitment and data collection took place from December 2022 to June 2023 using direct-to-patient channels, including panels, clinician referral, patient advocacy groups, and social media, with immunocompromising diagnosis confirmation collected and assessed for a randomly selected 25% of immunocompromised participants. The planned total sample size is 3718 participants and participant-caregiver pairs. Results will be reported by immunocompromised status, immunocompromising condition category, country, age group, and other subgroups. RESULTS: All data analyses and reporting were planned to be completed by December 2023. Results are planned to be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals in 2024-2025. CONCLUSIONS: This study will quantify immunocompromised individuals' physical distancing behaviors to avoid COVID-19 and their association with HRQoL as well as health state utilities. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/52643.

Validation of a new instrument for measuring disease-specific quality of life: A pilot study among patients with chronic kidney disease and hyperkalemia.

BACKGROUND: To prepare for a longitudinal study of the effects of potassium-lowering treatment on quality of life (QOL), we quantified the validity of a new disease-specific instrument for measuring QOL, using data from patients who had hyperkalemia (HK) due to chronic kidney disease (CKD) or chronic heart failure, and were also being treated with potassium binders (PBs). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, the participants were 98 patients at five outpatient clinics in Japan. The outcome measures were the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form (SF-36), a widely used generic measure of QOL, and the Quality of Life Disease-specific Impact Scale (QDIS-7), a recently-developed disease-specific measure of QOL. Internal-consistency reliability was quantified, and factor analysis was done to confirm hypothesized QOL dimensions. Validation tests used two external criteria: CKD stage, and PB formulation. PB formulation was used because different formulations are associated with different degrees of patients' burden. Using a previously-described method, we computed the relative validity (RV) of the two measures. RESULTS: Two factor scoring of the SF-36 and one factor scoring of the QDIS-7, as standardized from previous studies, were confirmed. The RVs showed that the QDIS-7 was much more valid than the SF-36, for discriminating between groups defined clinically (by CKD stage), and also between groups defined by PB formulation. Reliability was satisfactory: 0.73-0.95 for the SF-36 and 0.86 for the QDIS-7. CONCLUSIONS: The QDIS-7 with CKD or PB attributions was more valid than the SF-36 for measuring the effects of CKD and of PB formulation on QOL.

Impact of treatment of hyperkalaemia on quality of life: design of a prospective observational cohort study of long-term management of hyperkalaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease or chronic heart failure in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalaemia (HK) is a frequent complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and/or chronic heart failure (CHF). HK must be managed, both to protect patients from its direct clinical adverse outcomes and to enable treatment with disease-modifying therapies including renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. However, the experiences of patients undergoing treatment of HK are not clearly understood. Optimising treatment decisions and improving long-term patient management requires a better understanding of patients' quality of life (QOL). Thus, the aims of this research are: (1) to describe treatment patterns and the impact of treatment on a patient's QOL, (2) to study the relationships between treatment patterns and the impact of treatment on a patient's QOL and (3) to study the relationships between the control of serum potassium (S-K) and the impact of treatment on a patient's QOL, in patients with HK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective cohort study with 6 months of follow-up in 30-40 outpatient nephrology and cardiology clinics in Japan. The participants will be 350 patients with CKD or CHF who received their first potassium binders (PB) prescription to treat HK within the previous 6 months. Medical records will be used to obtain information on S-K, on treatment of HK with PBs and with diet, and on the patients' characteristics. To assess the impact of treatment on a patient's QOL, questionnaires will be used to obtain generic health-related QOL, CKD-specific and CHF-specific QOL, and PB-specific QOL. Multivariable regression models will be used to quantify how treatment patterns and S-K control are related to the impact of treatment on a patient's QOL. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional review boards at all participating facilities review the study protocol. Patient consent will be obtained. The results will be published in international journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05297409.