Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Euro Surveill ; 20(9)2015 Mar 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25764188

RESUMEN

In many countries, national vaccination recommendations are developed by independent expert committees, so-called national immunisation technical advisory groups (NITAG). Since the evaluation of vaccines is complex and resource-demanding, collaboration between NITAGs that evaluate the same vaccines could be beneficial. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 30 European countries in February 2014, to explore basic characteristics and current practices of European NITAGs and identify potential modes and barriers for collaboration. Of 28 responding countries, 26 reported to have a NITAG or an equivalent expert group. Of these, 20 apply a systematic approach in the vaccine decision-making process, e.g. by considering criteria such as country-specific disease epidemiology, vaccine efficacy/effectiveness/safety, health economics, programme implementation/logistics or country-specific values/preferences. However, applied frameworks and extent of evidence review differ widely. The use of systematic reviews is required for 15 of 26 NITAGs, while results from transmission modelling and health economic evaluations are routinely considered by 18 and 20 of 26 NITAGs, respectively. Twenty-five countries saw potential for NITAG-collaboration, but most often named structural concerns, e.g. different NITAG structures or countries' healthcare systems. Our survey gathered information that can serve as an inventory on European NITAGs, allowing further exploration of options and structures for NITAG collaboration.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos , Asistencia Técnica a la Planificación en Salud , Inmunización , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Conducta Cooperativa , Europa (Continente) , Unión Europea , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25446313

RESUMEN

In order to be adequately protected throughout life and to protect specific risk groups from particular diseases, regular booster or specific indicator vaccinations are also recommended during adulthood. Adults should be vaccinated against seasonal influenza (annually, e.g., persons with underlying chronic diseases and persons aged ≥ 60 years), tetanus (every 10 years), and pertussis (as a one-time vaccination with the next due tetanus vaccine and, e.g., when people have close contact to newborn babies). The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the current status of vaccination uptake among adults living in Germany, focusing on these three vaccines. In line with nationwide continuous health monitoring, the Robert Koch Institute conducted the representative study "German Health Update" (GEDA 2012) between 2012 and 2013. The survey is conducted regularly and adults are asked questions relating to their vaccination status through computer-assisted telephone interviews. Overall, 19,294 interviews were held. In 2010/2011 and 2011/2012, seasonal influenza uptake among persons aged ≥ 60 years was 54.3 and 52.6 % and among individuals with underlying chronic diseases 46.2 and 42.9 %. 7.6 and 75.6 % of participants reported up-to-date pertussis and tetanus vaccination, respectively. 22 % of people living with a baby in one household were vaccinated against pertussis. In general, vaccination rates against seasonal influenza, pertussis, and tetanus among adults are still low, but differ depending on the specific vaccination. The required aim of the European Commission to reach influenza vaccination coverage by the 2014/2015 winter season of 75 % of higher age groups has not yet been reached. The low pertussis vaccination coverage among persons in close household contact to infants poses a big challenge to the implementation of the cocooning strategy to protect the very vulnerable newborns. To emphasize the importance of a complete vaccination schedule and to increase vaccination uptake, tailored interventions should be provided for both physicians and adults.


Asunto(s)
Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Tétanos/prevención & control , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina/uso terapéutico , Distribución por Sexo , Tétanos/epidemiología , Toxoide Tetánico/uso terapéutico , Tos Ferina/epidemiología
3.
Epidemiol Infect ; 142(4): 789-96, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23823129

RESUMEN

Between April and July 2011 there was an outbreak of measles virus, genotype D4, in Berlin, Germany. We identified 73 case-patients from the community and among students of an anthroposophic school, who participated in a 4-day school trip, as well as their family and friends. Overall, 27% were aged ≥ 20 years, 57% were female and 15% were hospitalized. Of 39 community case-patients, 38% were aged ≥ 20 years, 67% were female and 63% required hospitalization. Unvaccinated students returning from the school trip were excluded from school, limiting transmission. Within the group of 55 school-trip participants, including 20 measles case-patients, a measles vaccine effectiveness of 97.1% (95% confidence interval 83.4-100) for two doses was estimated using exact Poisson regression. Our findings support school exclusions and the recommendation of one-dose catch-up vaccination for everyone born after 1970 with incomplete or unknown vaccination status, in addition to the two-dose routine childhood immunization recommendation.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/transmisión , Adolescente , Adulto , Berlin , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/prevención & control , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/transmisión , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Instituciones Académicas , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
4.
Gesundheitswesen ; 76(1): 44-7, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23632821

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: General practitioners serve as important multipliers for seasonal influenza vaccination in risk groups such as elderly or chronically ill persons, for whom vaccination is recommended in Germany by the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO). Moreover, physicians are a target group for influenza vaccination themselves. METHODS: Data from 1 590 telephone interviews were analysed. The study population comprised private physicians from 4 different disciplines (general and internal medicine, gynaecology, paediatrics). We assessed seasonal and pandemic vaccination coverage, attitudes and informational needs related to vaccination in general, and opinions about the pandemic situation 2009. RESULTS: Of the interviewed physicians, 61% stated that they have been vaccinated against seasonal influenza regularly. Main reasons for not/only occasionally having received a flu shot were: the belief that seasonal influenza vaccination is not necessary for them (78%) or having forgotten about the vaccination (28%). The interviewed physicians expressed a great demand for active information on STIKO recommendations and certain aspects of the seasonal influenza vaccination. There was a significant association between physicians' own influenza vaccination status and the provision of vaccination information materials, utilisation of a data management system for the vaccination of patients, and active vaccination reminders in the physicians' office. In 2009/10, almost 60% had received a pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccination. A major barrier to vaccine uptake was the mistrust in the safety of H1N1 vaccines (stated by 54% of non-vaccinees). Information for the public and physicians by the German public health authorities during the pandemic was rather critically appraised by the respondents. CONCLUSION: Compared to other subgroups of health-care workers, among private physicians seasonal and pandemic vaccine uptake was rather high. The physicians' need for more information on vaccination topics can be met by intensified publishing and communication activities of STIKO and by using existing physician-information channels.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Práctica Privada/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Alfabetización en Salud , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estaciones del Año , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25267316

RESUMEN

Residents and staff of nursing homes are important target groups for influenza vaccination in Germany. The aim of this study was to gain the first insights into whether nursing homes organize activities with respect to vaccination against influenza and whether there is a demand for further information. In the context of the national influenza immunization campaign-which is jointly carried out by the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and the Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA) on an annual basis-influenza information kits were sent to the management of 10,700 nursing homes in September 2013. Along with the information material, the institutions also received a questionnaire to which they were able to respond via mail, fax, or online. Data from 988 homes were included in the analysis. The majority of institutions informed both residents (88.9 %) and nursing staff (81.2 %) about influenza vaccination. However, only 64.7 % of nursing homes carried out specific immunization activities for their residents and only half (49.3 %) offered a flu shot to their staff. When asked why the institutions do not provide influenza-specific information and vaccination to their staff, the majority had the opinion that this is the responsibility of each individual's general practitioner. Overall, only 4.9 % of nursing homes assessed influenza vaccination coverage among their staff annually. A third of all surveyed institutions (33.6 %) expressed a demand for additional influenza vaccine-related information. In conclusion, improved health education is needed to raise awareness about the importance of influenza vaccination among residents and employees of nursing homes in Germany so as to prevent influenza-associated morbidity and mortality in this risk group.


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Evaluación de Necesidades , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Euro Surveill ; 18(33): 20557, 2013 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23968877

RESUMEN

In Germany, mumps has been notifiable until 2013 only in the five Eastern federal states (EFS) of former East Germany. Due to different immunisation policies until 1990 and varying vaccination coverages thereafter, mumps incidences cannot be extrapolated to the 11 Western federal states (WFS). We studied mumps-related International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) code diagnoses claimed through statutory health insurances between 2007 and 2011 to estimate countrywide mumps incidences in the outpatient sector, and compared them with case numbers from ambulatory notification data. Overall, 32,330 outpatient mumps cases were claimed. Annual incidence ranged between 9.3/100,000 and 11.8/100,000 and showed a significant decreasing trend. Compared with EFS, mumps incidence in WFS was higher and indicated a shift towards older age groups. Notified outpatient case numbers in EFS were 13-fold lower and from voluntary surveillance during an outbreak in the WFS Bavaria 8-fold lower than from insurance data (n=316 versus n=4,217 and n=238 versus 1,995, respectively). Of all notified cases with available information, 75.4% (EFS) and 57.6% (Bavaria) were unvaccinated; 6.8% (EFS) and 19.3% (Bavaria) required hospitalisation. In Germany, mumps is still endemic despite decades of vaccination, with considerable underreporting in the established notification systems.


Asunto(s)
Paperas/epidemiología , Orquitis/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Niño , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Masculino , Notificación Obligatoria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paperas/diagnóstico , Paperas/prevención & control , Orquitis/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
7.
Euro Surveill ; 18(28)2013 Jul 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23870095

RESUMEN

Between October 2012 and May 2013, five cases of invasive meningococcal disease in young men who have sex with men (MSM) living in Berlin were notified to local health authorities in Germany. Three of the five cases died. All were caused by serogroup C variants with the finetype P1.5-1,10-8:F3-6. Awareness was increased through the use of community networks; an extension of the existing vaccination recommendation to all MSM is currently being considered.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Homosexualidad Masculina , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Neisseria meningitidis/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Notificación de Enfermedades , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones Meningocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Meningocócicas/microbiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tipificación Molecular , Neisseria meningitidis/clasificación , Neisseria meningitidis/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Serotipificación , Adulto Joven
8.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23990088

RESUMEN

Vaccination against measles and rubella has been included in national immunization programs worldwide for several decades. In this article, we present the evidence related to the effectiveness of measles and rubella vaccination based on published systematic reviews, and we describe the epidemiological and health economic effects of vaccination at a population level. Several observational studies demonstrate the high effectiveness (> 90 %) of both measles and rubella vaccination. The global measles mortality reduction and the dramatic decrease in rubella and measles incidences after introduction of routine immunization contribute to the very high quality of evidence. The countries of the Americas have proved that it is feasible to eliminate measles and rubella by strengthening infant immunization through routine vaccination services and by conducting supplemental immunization activities in other childhood age groups so as to close immunity gaps. An economic evaluation of measles and rubella vaccination specifically for the healthcare system in Germany does not exist. However, we conducted a systematic review and identified 11 health-economic studies from other industrialized countries and one for a hypothetical industrialized country. Results indicate that vaccination against measles and rubella had either a cost-effective or even a cost-saving potential, which could be assumed with some limitations also for the German setting. In conclusion, there is compelling evidence that the available vaccines are very effective and that measles and rubella elimination is feasible if adequate vaccination strategies are implemented. In Germany, catch-up vaccination programs are urgently needed for children, adolescents, and young adults specifically in the western federal states.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación Masiva/economía , Sarampión/economía , Sarampión/prevención & control , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/economía , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Vacunación Masiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Sarampión/epidemiología , Vacuna Antisarampión/economía , Vacuna Antisarampión/uso terapéutico , Prevalencia , Medición de Riesgo , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/epidemiología , Vacuna contra la Rubéola/economía , Vacuna contra la Rubéola/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23275959

RESUMEN

For the first time in history, the conditions to influence the course of an influenza pandemic through vaccination were set during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic in 2009. The specific requirements for pandemic vaccines are to be highly immunogenic in immunologically naive individuals and to be producible quickly in large quantities. In contrast, seasonal influenza vaccines induce a booster response and a broadening of preexisting immunity. In this article the concepts of seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines and data on their immunogenicity and clinical efficacy are reviewed and discussed. In the upcoming years, seasonal influenza vaccination will continue to be based on inactivated split-virion and subunit vaccines or the live attenuated cold-adapted vaccine. The pandemic vaccines used in 2009 proved to be more immunogenic than expected from prepandemic vaccine trials, while the adverse events observed with AS03-adjuvanted vaccines call their future use into question. However, neither seasonal nor pandemic influenza vaccines can be regarded to be an ideal solution, because they have to be frequently adapted to new virus strains and they lack effectiveness in particular risk groups. They can be regarded as interim approaches to highly immunogenic vaccines that hopefully become available in the future. The underlying principles of future vaccines are also presented in this article.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunación Masiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Estaciones del Año , Diseño de Fármacos , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/clasificación , Vacunación Masiva/tendencias , Prevalencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23978983

RESUMEN

One of the special challenges in immunization policy is communication and access to adolescents. To identify barriers and enablers for the immunization of this specific target group, we conducted 11 focus group discussions with adolescents with and without migration background, mothers with Turkish and Russian migration background, and physicians in private practice in March 2011. The results showed that for adolescents, the utilization of immunization was guided by informational and organizational processes in families and by the consulting physician. The low awareness of immunization-related issues that was observed among adolescents is especially challenging, because routine visits to the doctor often stop with the transition from pediatric to adult health care. Immigration-related factors may additionally affect the utilization of immunization services. Besides improving access to information and lowering the barriers to immunization for adolescents in general, culturally sensitive interventions may be a promising approach for improving communication between mothers and the immunizing physician and thereby improving vaccination coverage in the adolescent target group.


Asunto(s)
Emigración e Inmigración/estadística & datos numéricos , Alfabetización en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Federación de Rusia/etnología , Turquía/etnología , Adulto Joven
11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23807405

RESUMEN

Two rotavirus (RV) vaccines were introduced to the European market in 2006. To support the decision-making process of the German Standing Committee on Vaccination ("Ständige Impfkommission", STIKO) regarding adoption of routine RV vaccination into the national vaccination schedule in Germany relevant scientific background was reviewed. According to STIKO's Standard Operating Procedures for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations, a set of key questions was addressed and systematic reviews were performed with a focus on the efficacy, effectiveness, impact and safety of RV vaccines. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to assess the quality of available evidence. Data from 5 randomized controlled trials demonstrated a high efficacy of RV vaccines in preventing severe RV-associated gastroenteritis (91%) and hospitalization (92%) in settings comparable to Germany. Post-marketing observational studies confirmed these findings. In several countries, impact studies suggest that age groups not eligible for vaccination might also benefit from herd effects and demonstrated a decrease in the number of nosocomial RV infections after RV vaccine introduction. The vaccines were considered safe, except for a slightly increased risk of intussusception shortly after the first dose, corresponding to 1-2 additional cases per 100,000 infants vaccinated (relative risk =1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-2.14). RV case-fatality is extremely low in Germany. However, RV incidence among children aged <5 years is high (reported 8-14 cases per 1000 children annually), and of these almost half require hositalization. In view of the available evidence and expected benefits, STIKO recommends routine rotavirus vaccination of children under the age of 6 months with the main goal of preventing RV-associated hospitalizations in Germany, especially among infants and young children.


Asunto(s)
Vacunación Masiva/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infecciones por Rotavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/normas , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino
12.
Epidemiol Infect ; 140(9): 1589-98, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22313789

RESUMEN

In order to contain a measles outbreak in a German asylum-seekers' shelter, serological testing of all residents was performed, followed by selective vaccination of those with negative test results/not tested. In this paper we describe the outbreak epidemiologically and then compare the implemented strategy with a hypothetical mass vaccination of all individuals unvaccinated or with unknown vaccination status born after 1970 as recommended by the German Standing Committee on Vaccination in terms of potentially avoided cases, logistics, and costs. Three hundred (70%) residents participated in the serological testing, of which 39 (13%) were seronegative. In total, 144 individuals were eligible for vaccination, while a mass vaccination would have targeted 359 persons. However, serological testing was time- and personnel consuming and revealed several logistical problems. Its costs amounted to €90 000, double that of mass vaccination that additionally might have avoided three of the eight cases. Mass vaccination seems the preferred measure for measles outbreak control in such settings.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Vacunación Masiva , Vacuna Antisarampión/uso terapéutico , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Modelos Biológicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Brotes de Enfermedades/economía , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Alemania/etnología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Vacunación Masiva/economía , Vacuna Antisarampión/economía , Refugiados , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Adulto Joven
13.
Epidemiol Infect ; 140(3): 491-9, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21733251

RESUMEN

Robust disease burden estimates are important for decision-making concerning introduction of new vaccines. Dengue is a major public health problem in the tropics but robust disease burden estimates are lacking. We conducted a two-sample, capture-recapture study in the largest province in Cambodia to determine disease under-recognition to the National Dengue Surveillance System (NDSS). During 2006-2008, community-based active surveillance for acute febrile illness was conducted in 0- to 19-year-olds in rural and urban areas combined with testing for dengue virus infection. Of 14 354 individuals under active surveillance (22 498 person-seasons), the annual incidence ranged from 13·4 to 57·8/1000 person-seasons. During the same period, NDSS incidence rates ranged from 1·1/1000 to 5·7/1000, which was 3·9- to 29·0-fold lower than found in the capture-recapture study. In hospitalized cases, the rate of under-recognition was 1·1- to 2·4-fold. This study shows the substantial degree of under-recognition/reporting of dengue and that reported hospitalized cases are not a good surrogate for estimating dengue disease burden.


Asunto(s)
Dengue/epidemiología , Adolescente , Cambodia/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Vigilancia de la Población , Adulto Joven
14.
Euro Surveill ; 17(13)2012 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22490383

RESUMEN

During the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic in 2009/10, a total of 13 consecutive surveys were carried out of the general population in Germany to monitor knowledge, attitude and behaviour concerning the disease and vaccination against pandemic influenza in real time. In total, 13,010 persons aged 14 years or older were interviewed by computer-assisted telephone techniques between November 2009 and April 2010. During the peak of the pandemic, only 18% of participants stated that they perceived the risk of pandemic influenza as high; this proportion fell to 10% in January 2010. There was a significant difference in information-seeking behaviour among population subgroups concerning the disease and vaccine uptake. However, in all subgroups, conventional media sources such as television, radio and newspapers were more frequently used than the Internet. While the majority of participants (78%) felt sufficiently informed to make a decision for or against vaccination, overall vaccination coverage remained low. Among those who decided against vaccination, fear of adverse events and perception that the available vaccines were not sufficiently evaluated were the most frequently stated reasons. Such mistrust in the vaccines and the perceived low risk of the disease were the main barriers that contributed to the low vaccination coverage in Germany during the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Pandemias , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/virología , Conducta en la Búsqueda de Información , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Percepción , Vigilancia de la Población , Riesgo , Teléfono , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
15.
Euro Surveill ; 17(2)2012 Jan 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22264864

RESUMEN

The 2009 influenza pandemic has introduced the new re-assorted influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus which recirculated during the 2010/11 influenza season. Before that season, it was possible to acquire protective immunity either by pandemic or seasonal influenza vaccination against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 or by natural infection. To obtain data on vaccination coverage and antibody levels in a reference population and to calculate whether or not the herd immunity threshold (HIT, calculated as 33% given an R0 of 1.5) was reached at the beginning of the 2010/11 season we performed a seroprevalence study in November 2010 in Hamburg, Germany. Antibody titres were assessed applying a haemagglutination inhibition test. Vaccination coverage was very low: 14% for pandemic and 11% for seasonal 2010/11 vaccinations. Even in those with underlying risk factors, vaccination coverage was not much higher: 17% for both vaccines. Serological analysis revealed antibody titres of ≥1:10 in 135 of 352 (38%) and of ≥1:40 in 61 of 352 study participants (17%). Specific antibodies were measurable in 26% of those without history of vaccination or natural infection, indicating a high proportion of subclinical and mild influenza disease. Nevertheless, the HIT was not reached, leaving the majority of the population susceptible to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and its potential complications.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Alemania/epidemiología , Pruebas de Inhibición de Hemaglutinación , Humanos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estaciones del Año , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
18.
Epidemiol Infect ; 138(2): 145-66, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19804658

RESUMEN

Increasing numbers of non-travel-associated hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections have been reported in Europe in recent years. Our objective was to review the evidence on risk factors and transmission routes of autochthonous HEV infection and hepatitis E in Europe in order to develop recommendations for future research, prevention and control. A systematic literature review was performed to identify all primary reports and studies published during 1998-2008 on hepatitis E in humans and animals in Europe by searching Pubmed, reference lists of major articles and international conference proceedings. Each of the 106 included studies was categorized into one of three evidence levels (EL) based on study design and diagnostic methodology. The evidence was generally weak (73 were assigned to EL1, two to both EL1 and EL2, and 30 to EL2), further compounded by the use of poorly validated serological assays in some studies. Only one case-control study was assigned to EL3. Persons with autochthonous hepatitis E infection were on average older than the general population and predominantly male. There was no evidence for one main transmission route of HEV infection or risk factor for hepatitis E. However, zoonotic transmission seemed likely and person-to-person transmission too inefficient to cause clinical disease. Multiple routes of transmission probably exist and should be further investigated through analytical studies and reliable diagnostic kits. Based on current evidence that points to zoonotic transmission from pigs, thorough cooking of all porcine products, prevention of cross-contamination in the kitchen and improved education for occupationally exposed people (e.g. pig farmers, veterinarians and sewage workers) may help prevent HEV infection. Although evidence for parenteral transmission is limited, it is recommended that a risk assessment is undertaken.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Hepatitis E , Hepatitis E/epidemiología , Hepatitis E/transmisión , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo
19.
Euro Surveill ; 15(18)2010 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20460094

RESUMEN

During the 2009 influenza pandemic, a monovalent AS03-adjuvanted vaccine was almost exclusively used in Germany for immunisation against the 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus. One-dose vaccination was recommended for all age groups. We applied the screening method for the rapid assessment of vaccine effectiveness (VE) based on reported data of vaccinated and unvaccinated pandemic influenza cases and vaccination coverage estimates. Preliminary results demonstrate excellent VE in persons aged 14-59 years (96.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 95.2-97.9) and moderately high VE in those 60 years or older (83.3%; 95% CI: 71.0-90.5).


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Brotes de Enfermedades , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Entrevistas como Asunto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA