High-dose cisplatin with sodium thiosulfate protection.

Nephrotoxicity frequently limits the dose of cisplatin to less than 120 mg/m2 per injection. Sodium thiosulfate is a neutralizing agent for cisplatin that protects against renal damage. To determine whether injection of thiosulfate would permit larger doses of cisplatin to be administered, a fixed 9.9-g/m2 dose of thiosulfate was given intravenously over three hours concurrently with escalating doses of cisplatin. Cisplatin was administered over the last two hours of the thiosulfate infusion. Using this technique, it was possible to escalate the cisplatin dose to 225 mg/m2 before dose-limiting toxicities were encountered. Comparison of cisplatin pharmacokinetics in patients treated with 202.5 mg/m2 plus thiosulfate to those in patients treated with 100 mg/m2 without thiosulfate indicated that there were no changes in the elimination rate constant, volume of distribution, or total body clearance of cisplatin. The total drug exposure for the plasma was approximately twofold at the higher cisplatin dose. This study demonstrates that concurrent administration of thiosulfate permits at least a twofold increase in dose and total exposure to cisplatin.

The effects of postinduction intensification treatment with cytarabine and daunorubicin in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia: a prospective randomized clinical trial by Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Cancer and Leukemia Group B undertook a randomized trial of intensification treatment in adults aged 15 to 79 years with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) in complete remission (CR). Daunorubicin (DNR), prednisone, vincristine (VCR), intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (MTX), and asparaginase produced 177 CRs in 277 patients. One hundred fifty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment as follows: 74 received intensive cytarabine and DNR, and 77 received cycles of mercaptopurine (6-MP) and MTX, followed by 6MP, MTX, VCR, and prednisone for 3 years in all. One hundred twelve patients received CNS prophylaxis. Intensification produced major myelosuppression but did not improve remission duration (median, 21 months). Of the 151 patients with CRs who entered the intensification phase, 29% remain in continuous CR (43 to 117 months); in 19 patients, CRs have lasted for longer than 7 years. No relapses occurred after 60 months. Median survival from the time of randomization was 30 months. Those under 30 years of age responded more frequently, with longer CR and survival. While 53% of those aged 15 to 19 years remain in continuous CR, 92% of patients over 59 years have relapsed. The presence of a myeloid antigen on the leukemic cells was adversely prognostic for CR achievement and for survival. Pretreatment WBC and platelet levels independently affected CR duration and survival. Early M1 marrow development presaged longer remissions. CNS relapse occurred in 47 of 256 patients with normal CSF before treatment, in 29 before CNS prophylaxis. CNS disease occurred after CNS prophylaxis in 18 patients: 13 of 61 who had received standard premaintenance and five of 51 who received intensification. No advantage in CR duration or survival resulted from intensive treatment with DNR and cytarabine following induction of CR.

A phase 2 study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib, dexamethasone and lenalidomide for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Our previous studies have shown that lowering the dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and bortezomib in combination with intravenous dexamethasone on a longer 4-week cycle maintained efficacy and improved tolerability in both previously untreated and relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Lenalidomide has shown efficacy in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone but this combination has been poorly tolerated. We conducted this phase 2 study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01160484) to evaluate whether a longer 4-week schedule using modified doses and schedules of IV dexamethasone (40 mg), bortezomib (1.0 mg/m(2)) and PLD (4.0 mg/m(2)) administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 with lenalidomide 10 mg daily on days 1-14 (DVD-R) would be effective and tolerated for patients with R/R MM. A total of 40 heavily pretreated patients were enrolled and 84.6% showed clinical benefit (complete response, 20.5%; very good partial response, 10.3%; partial response, 17.9%; minimal response, 35.9%) to the combination regimen. An additional 10.3% showed stable disease and 5.1% progressed while on study. The regimen was well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events such as fatigue (40%), thrombocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (35%), anemia (30%), peripheral neuropathy (25%) and pneumonia (15%). Thus, the DVD-R regimen is well tolerated and produces high response rates for patients with R/R MM.