Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 14(2): 113-23, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20422436

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis of published literature comparing J-pouch with side to end anastomosis after anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from January 1980 to March 2009. A systematic review was performed to obtain a summative outcome. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials involving 273 patients were analysed. One hundred and thirty-eight patients were in the J-pouch and 135 in the side to end anastomosis (STEA) group. No significant difference in surgically related outcomes was established (hospital stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, overall morbidity and mortality). Resting pressures at 24 months post-operatively were lower in J-pouch group compared with STEA and approached statistical significance [random effects model: SMD = -1.23, 95% CI (-2.47, -0.01), z = -1.94, P = 0.053]. No statistical difference was found in volumetric parameters (Volume at which the patient first experiences a sensation to defaecate and maximal tolerable volume). No statistical difference except urgency at 6 months [P < 0.05] was elicited in functional outcomes (use of enemas, bowel medications, pads, incomplete defaecation and stool frequency) between J-pouch and STEA groups. CONCLUSIONS: J-pouch or STEA are acceptable and safe options after AR for rectal cancer. Either approach may be considered according to surgeon choice. A randomized controlled trial including a larger number of patients is required to strengthen the evidence.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Reservorios Cólicos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Acta Chir Belg ; 109(1): 98-100, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19341206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal abscess, extending to the groin as an isolated tender lump, is rare as the first manifestation of Crohn's disease. CASE PRESENTATION: This report describes a young, fit and healthy 22 year-old woman with no previous history of gastrointestinal disorder, who presented with an isolated, tender lump in her right groin as the initial presentation of Crohn's disease. The patient, after a conventional incision and drainage of the abscess, was readmitted with enterocutaneous fistula at the right groin. After radiological investigations, she underwent a laparotomy, which showed jejunal perforation through ileocaecal mesentery producing retrocaecal abscess. There was also a suspicious fistulous connection between jejunum and ileo-caecal junction. A segmental small bowel resection and a limited right hemicolectomy with primary anastomoses were performed. The patient made an uneventful post-operative recovery and was discharged home on the fifth post operative day. CONCLUSION: Crohn's disease could manifest as an isolated, tender groin lump which has not been described in the published literature so far. Since retroperitoneal abscess remains a rare but serious complication of Crohn's disease, aggressive operative therapy should be ensued without delay in order to remove the source of the abscess. Groin abscess could conceal surprises and should always be investigated radiologically before proceeding to incision and drainage.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Absceso del Psoas/etiología , Colectomía/métodos , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Femenino , Ingle , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Fístula Intestinal/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Absceso del Psoas/cirugía , Espacio Retroperitoneal , Adulto Joven
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 10(4): 352-6, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17645570

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the internet as a source of information for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD: Six of the most common search engines (Yahoo, Google, MSN search, Alta Vista, Excite and Lycos) were used for the search of the generic term 'CRC'. First 300 links were analysed and classified by information type, provider, readership and commercial orientation. RESULTS: The average time delay was 1.70 s before matches were located. A total of 3.2827 million matches on CRC were found using the six search engines ranging from 700 (Excite) to 1 417 000 (Lycos) websites. Approximately 50% of the links were based on information from textbooks or governmental websites. Commercial companies giving information about private hospitals and products provided over 50% of the websites on CRC. The distribution of target readers was uneven, although a majority of websites were delivering CRC information to public and patients. Readability of information was difficult to comprehend by the public. CONCLUSION: The internet is becoming an essential tool for disseminating information about CRC to consumers. Half of the links on CRC are commercially oriented, containing information on goods or private health services. Less than 1% information is being provided by professional societies. To provide relevant CRC information, key consensus criteria for evaluating healthcare-related websites have to be established. There is an urgent need for CRC information on the internet to be regulated through the establishment of government-funded organizations (e.g. NHS) or professional societies (e.g. ACPGBI).


Asunto(s)
Publicidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Servicios de Información , Internet/normas , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Defensa del Consumidor , Revelación , Humanos , Difusión de la Información , Control de Calidad
4.
Acta Chir Belg ; 108(4): 460-1, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18807604

RESUMEN

AIM: To discuss an unusual and rare complication of perforated caecal volvulus (CV) following open anterior resection. METHODS: A retrospective review of the case notes of a patient. RESULTS: CV is a well known but rare cause of bowel obstruction. Chronic constipation, distal colonic obstruction and post-operative ileus are potentially aggravating factors for the development of CV in anatomically susceptible patients. The anatomical susceptibility for CV was noticed during the first operation but prophylactic caecopexy was not performed due to lack of evidence in the literature. This patient developed CV after anterior resection and subsequently underwent a second laparotmy for right hemicolectomy. CONCLUSION: CV is a known but rare case of postoperative bowel obstruction. The role of prophylactic caecopexy could be discussed in order to avoid the development of postoperative CV in anatomically susceptible patients.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Enfermedades del Ciego/etiología , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Vólvulo Intestinal/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Ciego/diagnóstico , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Ileostomía/métodos , Perforación Intestinal/diagnóstico , Vólvulo Intestinal/diagnóstico , Laparotomía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rotura Espontánea , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
5.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 89(3): 229-32, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17394704

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work was to assess the effect of intermittent bupivacaine infusion into rectus sheath space on postoperative opioid requirement, postoperative pain score and peak expiratory flow rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomised study involving patients undergoing midline laparotomy. Patients were randomised to receive either intermittent infusion of bupivacaine 0.25% or normal saline via catheters placed in the rectus sheath for 48 h after operation. All patients received intravenous morphine infusion on demand with a patient-controlled analgesic device (PCAD). RESULTS: Forty ASA I-III patients were studied. Nineteen were randomised to receive bupivacaine and 21 patients received normal saline. Patient characteristics and surgical variables were comparable in the two groups. The mean wound lengths were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative opioid requirement, postoperative pain score and peak expiratory flow rate between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent bupivacaine infusion into the rectus sheath space after midline laparotomy does not reduce postoperative opioid requirement nor does it affect postoperative pain score or peak expiratory flow rate.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Anciano , Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente , Anestesia Rectal , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intralesiones , Infusiones Intravenosas , Laparotomía/métodos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/fisiopatología , Ápice del Flujo Espiratorio/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Prospectivos
6.
Br J Anaesth ; 95(5): 634-42, 2005 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16155038

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Occult hypovolaemia is a key factor in the aetiology of postoperative morbidity and may not be detected by routine heart rate and arterial pressure measurements. Intraoperative gut hypoperfusion during major surgery is associated with increased morbidity and postoperative hospital stay. We assessed whether using intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management to minimize hypovolaemia would reduce postoperative hospital stay and the time before return of gut function after colorectal surgery. METHODS: This single centre, blinded, prospective controlled trial randomized 128 consecutive consenting patients undergoing colorectal resection to oesophageal Doppler guided or central venous pressure (CVP)-based (conventional) intraoperative fluid management. The intervention group patients followed a dynamic oesophageal Doppler guided fluid protocol whereas control patients were managed using routine cardiovascular monitoring aiming for a CVP between 12 and 15 mm Hg. RESULTS: The median postoperative stay in the Doppler guided fluid group was 10 vs 11.5 days in the control group P<0.05. The median time to resuming full diet in the Doppler guided fluid group was 6 vs 7 for controls P<0.001. Doppler patients achieved significantly higher cardiac output, stroke volume, and oxygen delivery. Twenty-nine (45.3%) control patients suffered gastrointestinal morbidity compared with nine (14.1%) in the Doppler guided fluid group P<0.001, overall morbidity was also significantly higher in the control group P=0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management was associated with a 1.5-day median reduction in postoperative hospital stay. Patients recovered gut function significantly faster and suffered significantly less gastrointestinal and overall morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/métodos , Hipovolemia/prevención & control , Intestino Grueso/cirugía , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Presión Venosa Central , Método Doble Ciego , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipovolemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Intestino Grueso/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Volumen Sistólico
7.
Colorectal Dis ; 5(3): 233-40, 2003 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12780884

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopic surveillance after colorectal cancer resection is widely practised despite little evidence that it improves survival. The optimum protocol for colonoscopic follow-up after colorectal cancer resection has not yet been elucidated. We audited the outcome of an empirical colonoscopic follow-up programme in a cohort of patients who underwent colorectal resection with a minimum of five years follow-up to establish patterns of metachronous neoplasia and suitable surveillance intervals. METHODS: The colonoscopic records, biopsy results and follow-up details of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer between June 1990 and June 1996 were reviewed. The number and type of metachronous neoplastic lesions diagnosed was recorded. Rates of development of new neoplasms were estimated by calculating the time from operation to their first discovery. Factors predictive of further development of polyps or cancer were sought. Results were compared to published reports of intensive follow-up programmes. RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety-eight patients underwent colorectal resection with curative intent during the study period. 226 patients had one or more follow-up colonoscopies (mean time post resection 48.8 months). In total 352 colonoscopies, encompassing 1437 patient years of surveillance, were performed. Nine metachronous cancers in eight patients, five of which were asymptomatic were diagnosed by colonoscopy at a mean of 63 months. Three asymptomatic recurrences were diagnosed but all were inoperable. 70 (31%) patients had adenomatous polyps diagnosed after a mean time from operation of 34 months for simple adenomatous polyps and 21 months for those with advanced features. Patients with multiple polyps or advanced polyps at the initial colonoscopy were more likely to form subsequent polyps. Only 5.8% of patients with a single adenoma or a normal colon formed an advanced adenoma over the next 36 months of surveillance. CONCLUSION: The results of an empirical colonoscopic follow-up programme compared favourably to the results of the intensive programmes reported in the literature. Most patients are at very low risk of developing significant colonic pathology over the first five years after resection. Colonoscopic surveillance intervals need not be less than five years unless the patient has multiple adenomas or advanced adenomas at the first colonoscopy. Three yearly surveillance intervals are most probably adequate in these individuals.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Investigación Empírica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Colonoscopía/normas , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
8.
Colorectal Dis ; 5(6): 563-8, 2003 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14617241

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of total mesorectal excision (TME), short-course pre-operative radiotherapy (SCRT), the level of the anastomosis and other putative contributory factors to the incidence and degree of faecal incontinence after anterior resection of the rectum. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Survivors of anterior resection of the rectum performed between February 1996 and February 2001, with a functioning anastomosis, were asked to complete a telephone questionnaire regarding their current bowel habit. Faecal incontinence was scored using the St. Mark's Incontinence Score. RESULTS: The median age of 124 patients who completed the questionnaire was 76 years. Of these, 104 patients had neoplastic disease, 66 (53%) patients exhibited some degree of incontinence, median St. Marks' Score 6, interquartile range 3-10. There was a significant association between the anastomotic level, and the St. Mark's Score (P < 0.0001, linear regression). Male sex (P = 0.047), SCRT (P = 0.0014) and an anastomotic leak (P = 0.038) were associated with significantly higher incontinence scores. Age, splenic flexure mobilization, TME, anastomotic configuration or use of a temporary stoma had no detectable independent effect on incontinence scores. CONCLUSIONS: Poor functional outcome following anterior resection was associated with a low anastomosis, SCRT or an anastomotic leak. The finding that SCRT was a predictor of postoperative incontinence emphasizes the need for stringent patient selection for this treatment modality.


Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/radioterapia , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Radioterapia/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA