A Simulation Study to Evaluate Improvements in Anesthesia Work Environment Contamination After Implementation of an Infection Prevention Bundle.

BACKGROUND: Microbiological contamination of the anesthesia work environment (AWE) is a potential source of health care-associated infections. Medication syringes, stopcocks, and many other areas are routinely contaminated during anesthetic care, and adherence to hand hygiene recommendations is poor. Using a simulation model, we investigated whether AWE contamination could be reduced by implementing an intervention bundle focused on infection prevention. METHODS: Twenty-five anesthesia providers were enrolled in this nonrandomized simulation scenario crossover design study. Subjects were asked to complete 2 general anesthesia scenarios in a mock operating room: a baseline scenario and an intervention scenario in which the bundle was implemented. The bundle included: double gloving before intubation, confining all airway equipment to 1 area, and performing hand hygiene before touching the anesthesia cart. Before each scenario, a manikin's oropharynx and face were marked with ultraviolet fluorescent tracers. After each scenario, the AWE was inspected with a ultraviolet light source to detect contaminant, and all sites were photographed. A blinded observer scored the images for the presence or absence of tracer at 20 sites. Videos of the scenarios were analyzed for duration and number of hand hygiene and glove removal events. Data were analyzed using a mixed effects model. Subjects completed a survey about their experience and the value of the scenarios. RESULTS: The intervention was associated with a decreased subject contamination score of 4.0 (95% confidence interval, 2.2-5.6; P < .001), a 27% reduction in score between baseline and intervention scenarios. Some sites were universally contaminated despite the intervention (eg, laryngoscope handles). The intervention had a statistically significant impact on reducing contamination on medication syringes and the anesthesia cart. There was no significant difference in time needed to complete baseline and intervention scenarios. The majority of subjects felt that the simulations had significant value and would affect their future clinical behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the concept of an infection prevention bundle in reducing AWE contamination. Anesthesia providers deliver care in a unique environment in which "clean" and "contaminated" tasks are performed rapidly and often in parallel. Linking hand hygiene to specific high-impact tasks such as administering medications, designating areas for contaminated equipment, and double gloving before airway management are simple steps that can be implemented rapidly and are compatible with timely patient care. Our study has improved awareness of infection prevention issues in our department, and has highlighted simple and achievable actions that have the potential to reduce health care-associated infections.

Care of Young Children With Diabetes in the Childcare and Community Setting: A Statement of the American Diabetes Association.

Diabetes management in children extends from the home to other settings where children spend a significant portion of their waking hours. For young children (generally, aged <5 years) with diabetes, this includes childcare centers. Given their age and developmental stage, young children require a carefully thought-out, proactive diabetes care plan for the childcare setting, developed jointly by the health care provider and parents/guardians, and implemented by childcare staff. In the U.S., federal laws and some state laws protect the rights of children with diabetes in childcare and other settings to ensure they receive appropriate assistance with the diabetes management and care. This American Diabetes Association (ADA) Statement addresses the legal rights of children in the childcare setting, outlines the current best practices for diabetes care, and provides resources and responsibilities for parents/guardians, childcare providers, and health care providers. The ADA intends for these tools and information to support the health and well-being of young children with diabetes and offer helpful guidance to those caring for them.

17. Diabetes Advocacy: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Selective Epidurography for the Assessment of Epidural Catheter Placement After Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Adequate pain control immediately after esophagostomy is critical to patient recovery and may be compromised by uncertainty regarding correct epidural catheter placement. The aim of the current study was to determine the role of performing an epidurogram in selective patients to assess epidural placement after esophagectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing esophagectomy in a high-volume center were retrospectively reviewed to identify those in whom an epidurogram was performed less than 24 hours after surgery. Since 2012 epidurograms have been selectively performed in patients and have demonstrated features concerning for incorrect epidural catheter placement, including difficult/complicated insertion, negative sensory test, nonreassuring intraoperative hemodyamic response, and inadequate postoperative pain control. RESULTS: Fifty-two of 192 patients (27%; 43 men; age 65 ± 11 years) who underwent esophagostomy since 2012 had an epidurogram. Epidurograms were not associated with any adverse events. In 21 patients (40%) epidurogram findings led to a direct change in patient management, prompting either removal/replacement of an incorrectly sited catheter (n = 9), partial withdrawal of a catheter associated with unilateral contrast distribution (n = 2), or by endorsing a clinical decision to modify the analgesic regimen in a patient with a correctly sited epidural catheter (n = 10). Identifying and rescuing incorrect epidural catheter placement was not associated with longer intensive care unit/hospital stay or postoperative morbidity (p > 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: We reviewed selective epidurogram use in esophagectomy patients to determine its role in "rescuing" inadequate pain control through expediting clinical decision-making. Findings confirm that in selected patients epidurography is feasible and has the potential to directly contribute to patient care.

The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Checklist for Managing Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity: 2017 Version.

The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) periodically revises and updates its checklist for the management of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. The 2017 update replaces the 2012 version and reflects new information contained in the third ASRA Practice Advisory on Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity. Electronic copies of the ASRA checklist can be downloaded from the ASRA Web site (www.asra.com) for inclusion in local anesthetic toxicity rescue kits or perioperative checklist repositories.