New techniques to identify the tissue of origin for cancer of unknown primary in the era of precision medicine: progress and challenges.

Despite a standardized diagnostic examination, cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a rare metastatic malignancy with an unidentified tissue of origin (TOO). Patients diagnosed with CUP are typically treated with empiric chemotherapy, although their prognosis is worse than those with metastatic cancer of a known origin. TOO identification of CUP has been employed in precision medicine, and subsequent site-specific therapy is clinically helpful. For example, molecular profiling, including genomic profiling, gene expression profiling, epigenetics and proteins, has facilitated TOO identification. Moreover, machine learning has improved identification accuracy, and non-invasive methods, such as liquid biopsy and image omics, are gaining momentum. However, the heterogeneity in prediction accuracy, sample requirements and technical fundamentals among the various techniques is noteworthy. Accordingly, we systematically reviewed the development and limitations of novel TOO identification methods, compared their pros and cons and assessed their potential clinical usefulness. Our study may help patients shift from empirical to customized care and improve their prognoses.

Phase 1b/2 study of penpulimab (AK105), an antiprogrammed cell death-1 immunoglobulin G1 antibody, in advanced or metastatic solid tumors (AK105-204).

BACKGROUND: Penpulimab, a new-generation antiprogrammed cell death-1 immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, was engineered to optimize receptor occupancy and eliminate fragment crystallizable γ-mediated effector function. In this multicenter, phase 1b/2, multicohort study, the objective was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of penpulimab in advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Patients who had unresectable, advanced solid tumors were enrolled from six centers and received 200 mg penpulimab on day 1 every 2 weeks for up to 24 months. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version criteria 1.1. RESULTS: Between September 2, 2019, and January 1, 2020, 65 patients were enrolled and received penpulimab. At the time of data cutoff (May 11, 2022), the median follow-up was 12.6 months (range, 1.1-28.6 months). The ORR was 12.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5%-22.8%), with three (4.6%) complete responses and five (7.7%) partial responses. Twelve patients (18.5%) achieved stable disease, resulting in a disease control rate of 30.8% (95% CI, 19.9%-43.4%). The median duration of response was not reached (95% CI, 6.70 months to not estimable). In all cohorts, the median progression-free survival was 1.74 months (95% CI, 1.41-2.69 months), and the median overall survival was 16.59 months (95% CI, 7.82-22.18 months). Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events occurred in 9.2% and 27.7% of patients, respectively. Positive antidrug antibody responses to penpulimab were observed in one patient (1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Penpulimab showed promising antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile, offering a potential new treatment approach for solid tumors. These findings supported the evaluation of penpulimab's durable activity and safety, as monotherapy or in combination therapy, in specific malignancies.

The molecular subtyping and precision medicine in triple-negative breast cancer---based on Fudan TNBC classification.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is widely recognized as the most aggressive form of breast cancer, occurring more frequently in younger patients and characterized by high heterogeneity, early distant metastases and poor prognosis. Multiple treatment options have failed to achieve the expected therapeutic effects due to the lack of clear molecular targets. Based on genomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics, the multi-omics analysis further clarifies TNBC subtyping, which provides a greater understanding of tumour heterogeneity and targeted therapy sensitivity. For instance, the luminal androgen receptor subtype (LAR) exhibits responsiveness to anti-AR therapy, and the basal-like immune-suppressed subtype (BLIS) tends to benefit from poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) and anti-angiogenic therapy. The efficacy of multi-dimensional combination therapy holds immense importance in guiding personalized and precision medicine for TNBC. This review offers a systematic overview of recent FuDan TNBC molecular subtyping and its role in the instruction of clinical precision therapy.

Safety and antitumour activity of cadonilimab, an anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody, for patients with advanced solid tumours (COMPASSION-03): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 or CTLA-4 individually have shown substantial clinical benefits in the treatment of malignancies. We aimed to assess the safety and antitumour activity of cadonilimab monotherapy, a bispecific PD-1/CTLA-4 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial was conducted across 30 hospitals in China. Patients aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed, unresectable advanced solid tumours, unsuccessful completion of at least one previous systemic therapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible for inclusion. Patients who had previously received anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-CTLA-4 treatment were not eligible for inclusion. In the dose escalation phase of phase 1b, patients received intravenous cadonilimab at 6 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. In the dose expansion phase of phase 1b, cadonilimab at 6 mg/kg and a fixed dose of 450 mg were given intravenously every 2 weeks. In phase 2, cadonilimab at 6 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 2 weeks in three cohorts: patients with cervical cancer, oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The primary endpoints were the safety of cadonilimab in phase 1b and objective response rate in phase 2, based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. The safety analysis was done in all patients who received at least one dose of cadonilimab. Antitumour activity was assessed in the full analysis set for the cervical cancer cohort, and in all patients with measurable disease at baseline and who received at least one dose of cadonilimab in the oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma cohorts. The study is registered on ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03852251, and closed to new participants; follow-up has been completed. FINDINGS: Between Jan 18, 2019, and Jan 8, 2021, 240 patients (83 [43 male and 40 female] in phase 1b and 157 in phase 2) were enrolled. Phase 2 enrolled 111 female patients with cervical cancer, 22 patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (15 male and seven female), and 24 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (17 male and seven female). During dose escalation, no dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 67 (28%) of 240 patients; the most frequent grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were anaemia (seven [3%]), increased lipase (four [2%]), decreased bodyweight (three [1%]), decreased appetite (four [2%]), decreased neutrophil count (three [1%]), and infusion-related reaction (two [1%]). 17 (7%) patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. 54 (23%) of 240 patients reported serious treatment-related adverse events, including five patients who died (one due to myocardial infarction; cause unknown for four). In phase 2, in the cervical cancer cohort, with a median follow-up of 14·6 months (IQR 13·1-17·5), the objective response rate was 32·3% (32 of 99; 95% CI 23·3-42·5). In the oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cohort, with a median follow-up of 17·9 months (IQR 4·0-15·1), the objective response rate was 18·2% (four of 22; 95% CI 5·2-40·3). In the hepatocellular carcinoma cohort, with a median follow-up of 19·6 months (IQR 8·7-19·8), the objective response rate was 16·7% (four of 24; 95% CI 4·7-37·4). INTERPRETATION: Cadonilimab showed an encouraging tumour response rate, with a manageable safety profile, suggesting the potential of cadonilimab for the treatment of advanced solid tumours. FUNDING: Akeso Biopharma. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Baseline radiologic features as predictors of efficacy in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases receiving surufatinib.

Objective: Currently, pre-treatment prediction of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases (PNELM) receiving surufatinib treatment was unsatisfying. Our objective was to examine the association between radiological characteristics and efficacy/prognosis. Methods: We enrolled patients with liver metastases in the phase III, SANET-p trial (NCT02589821) and obtained contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images. Qualitative and quantitative parameters including hepatic tumor margins, lesion volumes, enhancement pattern, localization types, and enhancement ratios were evaluated. The progression-free survival (PFS) and hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using Cox's proportional hazard model. Efficacy was analyzed by logistic-regression models. Results: Among 152 patients who had baseline CECT assessments and were included in this analysis, the surufatinib group showed statistically superior efficacy in terms of median PFS compared to placebo across various qualitative and quantitative parameters. In the multivariable analysis of patients receiving surufatinib (N=100), those with higher arterial phase standardized enhancement ratio-peri-lesion (ASER-peri) exhibited longer PFS [HR=0.039; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.003-0.483; P=0.012]. Furthermore, patients with a high enhancement pattern experienced an improvement in the objective response ratio [31.3% vs. 14.7%, odds ratio (OR)=3.488; 95% CI: 1.024-11.875; P=0.046], and well-defined tumor margins were associated with a higher disease control rate (DCR) (89.3% vs. 68.2%, OR=4.535; 95% CI: 1.285-16.011; P=0.019) compared to poorly-defined margins. Conclusions: These pre-treatment radiological features, namely high ASER-peri, high enhancement pattern, and well-defined tumor margins, have the potential to serve as predictive markers of efficacy in patients with PNELM receiving surufatinib.

Identification of glycolysis-associated long non-coding RNA regulatory subtypes and construction of prognostic signatures by transcriptomics for bladder cancer.

Glycolysis-targeted cancer therapy based on long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), owing to its high specificity and less toxicity, is at the preclinical stages. Our study aimed to examine the roles of the core glycolysis-associated lncRNAs in bladder cancer (BC). Glycolysis scores of BC were computed by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). Glycolysis-associated lncRNAs were screened by Pearson's correlation analysis. Unsupervised consensus clustering using ConsensusClusterPlus assessed the glycolysis-associated lncRNAs for the identification of molecular subtypes of BC. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, genomic mutations, and tumor microenvironment (TME) analysis were used to compare the characteristics of different subtypes. Key glycolysis-associated lncRNAs were screened by first-order partial correlation and univariate Cox proportional-hazards model analyses; finally, the lncRNA signature was constructed. Four glycolysis-associated lncRNA-regulated subtypes having differential overall survival (OS), clinical features, genomic mutation profiles, and TME profiles along with nuclear immunotherapeutic responses were identified. Nine lncRNAs localized in the nucleus were identified and transcription factors (TFs) significantly negatively associated with these were found to be enriched in multiple oncogenic signaling pathways. Among them, three lncRNAs (AC093673.5, AC034220.3, and RP11-250B2.3) exerted the most profound effects on glycolysis and constituted the lncRNA signature, which could substantially distinguish the risk levels among different BC patients. Four glycolysis-associated lncRNA-regulated subtypes were identified in this study, reflective of the biological characteristics and heterogeneity of BC. Three key glycolysis-associated lncRNA constituting a signature could predict the risk levels in BC, provide a reference for stratification, and be used as prognostic markers for BC diagnosis and treatment.

Sintilimab in Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of diseases that show high heterogeneity but have limited treatment options. This phase I study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sintilimab, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in treating advanced NENs. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients pathologically diagnosed with NENs after standard treatment failure. Neuroendocrine neoplasms were classified into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine cancers (NECs). Every patient received sintilimab, and response was assessed every 9 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 57.0 years were enrolled from November 2016 to 2017. The median Ki-67 index was 60%. Five patients had NET, 1 had NET G3, 17 had NEC, and 1 had mixed adenocarcinoma-neuroendocrine carcinoma. The most common primary tumor sites were the pancreas and gastrointestinal tract in 7 and 10 patients, respectively. In phase Ia trial, 2 patients received sintilimab 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks, one received 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, and 21 patients enrolled in the phase Ib trial received 200 mg every 3 weeks. The objective response rate was 20.8% in all enrolled patients and 27.8% in NEC patients. The median progression-free survival was 2.2 and 2.1 months in patients with NET and NEC, respectively. The median OS was not applicable (NA) and 10.8 months (95% CI, 4.3, NA) with NET and NEC, respectively. The duration of response (DOR) was not reached, with a median follow-up time of 20.7 months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 17 (70.8%) patients. The most frequent TRAE was thyroid dysfunction (41.7%), and a grade 3 pulmonary infection occurred in 1 patient. The programmed cell death 1-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive (tumor proportion score ≥1%) rate was 18.8% (3 out of 16) and the expression of PD-L1 did not correlate with response. CONCLUSION: Sintilimab was well-tolerated and showed encouraging response in NECs. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02937116.

Phase Ia/Ib Study of the Selective MET Inhibitor, Savolitinib, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Safety, Efficacy, and Biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Savolitinib has shown good tolerability and preliminary efficacy, but efficacy biomarkers require investigation. The main purpose of this study was to confirm in Chinese patients the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of savolitinib and to explore overall benefit in tumors bearing c-Met aberration. METHODS: This was an open-label, multi-center, 2-part phase I study. A starting dose of 600 mg QD was initiated in the escalation phase, utilizing a 3+3 design with repeated QD and BID dosing. In the dose expansion phase, we enrolled patients with gastric cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with documented c-met aberration into 5 cohorts to further explore biomarkers. c-Met overexpression and amplification were assessed by immunohistochemistry and FISH, respectively. RESULTS: The safety analysis set included 85 patients. Only one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 fatigue) was reported in the 600 mg BID dosing group. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were nausea (29.4%), vomiting (27.1%), and peripheral edema (21.2%). Notably, in gastric cancer, response was only observed in patients with MET amplification (copy number 9.7-18.4), with an objective response rate of 35.7% and a disease control rate of 64.3%. For patients with NSCLC bearing a MET exon 14 skipping mutation, obvious target lesion shrinkage was observed in 2 of 4 patients, although PR was not achieved. CONCLUSION: The RP2D of savolitinib was established as 600 mg QD or 500 mg BID in Chinese patients. The promising response observed in patients with gastric cancer with c-met amplification and NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutation warrants further investigation. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT0198555.

Penpulimab, an anti-PD1 IgG1 antibody in the treatment of advanced or metastatic upper gastrointestinal cancers.

BACKGROUND: The safety and anti-tumor activity of penpulimab in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers were evaluated in this study. METHODS: Patients with advanced UGI cancers naive to immune checkpoint inhibitors were enrolled in two trials of penpulimab. In the Phase Ia/Ib trial in Australia, patients received penpulimab intravenous infusion of 1, 3 and 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks in dose-escalation phase and 200 mg every 2 weeks in dose-expansion phase. In the phase Ib/II trial conducted in China, patients received 200 mg penpulimab every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability for the phase Ia/Ib trial and the objective response rate for the phase Ib/II trial. The safety and efficacy of penpulimab in patients with UGI cancers in these two trials were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients with UGI cancers from Australia and China were enrolled in these two trials and had received penpulimab with a median of 6 (1-64) doses. 44.8% of patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), and 7.5% of patients experienced a grade ≥3 TRAE. Among 60 patients evaluable for response, the confirmed objective response rates ranged between 11.1 and 26.3% across cohorts for pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, gastric or Gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (Gastric/GEJ), and hepatocellular carcinoma. 11/13 (85.0%) responders had ongoing responses at data cutoff date. CONCLUSIONS: Penpulimab monotherapy demonstrated an acceptable safety and encouraged anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced UGI cancers. Further exploration in a large cohort of patients is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Phase Ia/Ib trial in Australia (NCT03352531) and phase Ib/II trial in China (NCT04172506).

Safety, antitumor activity and biomarkers of sugemalimab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas: results from the first-in-human phase 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: This first-in-human phase 1 trial is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, preliminary efficacy, and biomarkers of sugemalimab, a full-length, fully human anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, in Chinese patients with advanced malignancies. METHODS: Eligible patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas were enrolled in phase 1a to receive sugemalimab following a modified 3 + 3 design. The primary endpoints included safety, tolerability, and the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). In phase 1b, patients with 7 selected types of tumor received sugemalimab at the RP2D alone (monotherapy cohorts) or in combination with standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy (combination cohorts). The primary endpoint of phase 1b was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: As of 19 February 2020, 29 and 178 patients were treated in phase 1a and 1b, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in phase 1a, and the RP2D of sugemalimab was determined as 1200 mg fixed dose once every 3 weeks. Sugemalimab-related adverse events (AEs) were mostly (75.9%) grade 1-2 in phase 1a. Antitumor activity was observed across dose levels with an ORR of 24.1%. In phase 1b, 15.9% and 40.4% of patients in the monotherapy and combination cohorts, respectively, reported grade 3-5 sugemalimab-related AEs. Promising efficacy was observed in all combination cohorts, with ORRs ranging from 47.6 to 75.0%. Exploratory biomarker analysis did not indicate significant differences in responses at different PD-L1 expression/tumor mutation burden levels. CONCLUSIONS: Sugemalimab was well-tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity as monotherapy or in combination with SOC chemotherapy in advanced malignancies. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on Oct 18, 2017, number NCT03312842.

Semen as a rich source of diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer: latest evidence and implications.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers in men and the cause of numerous cancer deaths in the world. Nowadays, based on diagnostic criteria, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) evaluation and rectal examination are used to diagnose prostate-related malignancies. However, due to the different types of PCa, there are several doubts about the diagnostic value of PSA. On the other hand, semen is considered an appropriate source and contains various biomarkers in non-invasive diagnosing several autoimmune disorders and malignancies. Evidence suggests that analysis of semen biomarkers could be helpful in PCa diagnosis. Therefore, due to the invasiveness of most diagnostic methods in PCa, the use of semen as a biologic sample containing various biomarkers can lead to the emergence of novel and non-invasive diagnostic approaches. This review summarized recent studies on the use of various seminal biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of PCa.

Anlotinib Monotherapy for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase III Trial (ALTER0703).

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were limited. Anlotinib is a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor. ALTER0703 study was conducted to assess efficacy and safety of anlotinib for patients with refractory mCRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial involving 33 hospitals in China. Patients had taken at least two lines of therapies were 2:1 randomized to receive oral anlotinib (12 mg/day; days 1-14; 21 days per cycle) or placebo, plus best supportive care. Randomization was stratified by previous VEGF-targeting treatments and time from diagnosis to metastases. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life (QoL), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 419 patients (anlotinib: 282; placebo: 137) were treated from December 2014 to August 2016. The median PFS was improved in anlotinib group (4.1 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-4.5) over placebo group (1.5 months; 95% CI, 1.4-1.5), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.34 (95% CI, 0.27-0.43; p < .0001). However, median OS was similar between two groups (8.6 months; 95% CI, 7.8-9.7 vs. 7.2 months; 95% CI, 6.2-8.8; HR, 1.02; p = .870). Improvements of ORR and DCR were observed in anlotinib over placebo. The most common grade ≥ 3 anlotinib related adverse events were hypertension (20.92%), increased γ-GT (7.09%), and hand-foot skin reaction (6.38%). CONCLUSION: Anlotinib was tolerated in Chinese patients with refractory mCRC. Although OS did not reach significant difference, anlotinib still provided clinical benefits by substantially prolonged PFS in these patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In this randomized clinical trial that included 419 patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, substantial prolonged in progression-free survival was noted in patients who received anlotinib compared with those given placebo. Improvements on objective response rate and disease control rate was also observed in anlotinib group. However, overall survival was similar between the two groups. In a word, in third-line or above treatment of Chinese patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, anlotinib provided clinical benefit by significantly prolonged progression-free survival.

Efficacy and safety of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated advanced or metastatic nonsquamous or squamous NSCLC: two cohorts of an open-label, phase 1b study.

Combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy improves the therapeutic outcome for first-line (1L) patients with advance nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two cohorts of a phase 1b study (NCT02937116) aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, plus chemotherapy in 1L patients with nonsquamous and squamous NSCLC (nsqNSCLC/sqNSCLC); and to identify potential biomarkers for treatment response. Treatment-naïve patients with nsqNSCLC were enrolled and intravenously given sintilimab (200 mg), pemetrexed (500 mg/m2), and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 4 cycles in cohort D. Treatment-naïve patients with sqNSCLC were enrolled and intravenously given sintilimab (200 mg), gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2), and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), Q3W, for 6 cycles in cohort E. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the treatment. The additional objective was to explore biomarkers for the treatment efficacy. Twenty-one patients with nsqNSCLC, and 20 patients with sqNSCLC were enrolled in cohort D and cohort E, respectively. By the data cutoff (April 17, 2019), 8 (38.1%) patients in cohort D and 17 (85.0%) patients in cohort E experienced grade 3-4 adverse events. The median follow-up duration was 16.4 months (14.8-23.0) in cohort D and 15.9 months (11.7-17.7) in cohort E. The objective response rate was 68.4% (95% CI 43.4%, 87.4%) in cohort D and 64.7% (95% CI 38.3%, 85.8%) in cohort E. Neither PD-L1 expression nor tumor mutation burden value was significantly associated with an improved treatment response. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy exhibited manageable toxicity and an encouraging antitumor activity in patients with nsqNSCLC and sqNSCLC.

Adjuvant albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with S-1 vs. oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine after D2 gastrectomy in patients with stage III gastric adenocarcinoma: a phase III multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the only treatment option for operable gastric cancer. The CLASSIC and ACTS-GC studies showed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with stage III gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy is still very low. Whether adjuvant nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) combined chemotherapy is more effective than the XELOX standard adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III gastric cancer has not been confirmed. METHODS: This is a multicenter, open-label, phase III clinical study. In this trial, 616 patients with locally advanced stage III gastric cancer that underwent curative D2 radical surgery and achieved R0 are planned to be included. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to nab-paclitaxel combined with S-1 (AS) vs. oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine (XELOX). XELOX group: Patients assigned to the XELOX group received eight 3-week cycles of oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2) twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle plus intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle. AS group: AS group received eight 3-week cycles of oral S-1 (80-120 mg) (< 1.25 m2, 40 mg; 1.25 to < 1.5 m2, 50 mg; and > 1.5 m2, 60 mg) twice daily on days 1-14 plus intravenous nab-paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. The primary endpoint was the 3-year disease-free survival (3-year-DFS) defined as the time from randomisation to the time of recurrence of the original gastric cancer, development of a new gastric cancer, or death from any cause. The secondary endpoints were the overall survival, (defined as the time from the date of randomisation to date of death from any cause) and safety (any adverse event). DISCUSSION: Compared with previous studies, this study includes nab-paclitaxel based on S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, which is expected to achieve better efficacy and lower toxicity than the standard treatment. This study is the first clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with S-1 in patients with stage III gastric cancer after D2 radical resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT04135781 , on October 20th, 2019.

A novel genomic classification system of gastric cancer via integrating multidimensional genomic characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths with high heterogeneity. There is currently a paucity of clinically applicable molecular classification system to guide precise medicine. METHODS: A total of 70 Chinese patients with GC were included in this study and whole-exome sequencing was performed. Unsupervised clustering was undertaken to identify genomic subgroups, based on mutational signature, copy number variation, neoantigen, clonality, and essential genomic alterations. Subgroups were characterized by clinicopathological factors, molecular features, and prognosis. RESULTS: We identified 32 significantly mutated genes (SMGs), including TP53, ARID1A, PIK3CA, CDH1, and RHOA. Of these, PREX2, PIEZO1, and FSIP2 have not been previously reported in GC. Using a novel genome-based classification method that integrated multidimensional genomic features, we categorized GC into four subtypes with distinct clinical phenotypes and prognosis. Subtype 1, which was predominantly Lauren intestinal type, harbored recurrent TP53 mutation and ERBB2 amplification, high tumor mutation burden (TMB)/tumor neoantigen burden (TNB), and intratumoral heterogeneity, with a liver metastasis tendency. Subtype 2 tended to occur at an elder age, accompanying with frequent TP53 and SYNE1 mutations, high TMB/TNB, and was associated with poor prognosis. Subtype 3 and subtype 4 included patients with mainly diffuse/mixed type tumors, high frequency of peritoneal metastasis, and genomical stability, whereas subtype 4 was associated with a favorable prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: By integrating multidimensional genomic characteristics, we proposed a novel genomic classification system of GC associated with clinical phenotypes and provided a new insight to facilitate genome-guided risk stratification and disease management.

Subgroup analysis by prior anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR target therapy in FRESCO, a randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial.

Background: FRESCO study demonstrated efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Impact of prior targeted therapy (PTT) on efficacy and safety of fruquintinib was evaluated. Materials & methods: In this subgroup analysis of FRESCO trial, patients were divided into PTT and non-PTT subgroups, and efficacy and safety of fruquintinib were assessed, respectively. Results: In non-PTT subgroup, fruquintinib significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients compared with placebo. In PTT subgroup, the median OS and PFS of patients in fruquintinib arm was significantly higher than those in placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) rates were similar in both subgroups. Conclusion: Fruquintinib demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in OS, PFS, objective response rate, and disease control rate with manageable TEAEs in both subgroups. Clinical trial registration: NCT02314819 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Lay abstract In this analysis of the FRESCO trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in two different groups of patients (subgroups) with metastatic colorectal cancer - patients who received prior targeted therapy (PTT) and patients who did not (non-PTT). Of the 278 patients treated with fruquintinib, 111 patients received PTT. Patients treated with fruquintinib had longer overall survival and it took longer for their disease to worsen in both PTT and non-PTT subgroups compared with placebo. Patients in both subgroups treated with fruquintinib showed measurable reduction in their tumor size and disease control with similar side effects in patients of both the subgroups. These results suggest that fruquintinib is safe and effective in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in both subgroups.

Surufatinib in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (SANET-p): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Surufatinib showed superior efficacy in extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) in the phase 3 SANET-ep study. In SANET-p, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of surufatinib in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. METHODS: SANET-p was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, done in 21 hospitals across China. Eligible patients were adults (aged 18 years or older) with progressive, advanced, well differentiated pancreatic NETs, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and progression on up to two kinds of previous systemic regimens for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via an interactive web response system to receive 300 mg of surufatinib or placebo, taken orally once per day in consecutive 4-week treatment cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, poor compliance, use of other antitumour medication, pregnancy, loss to follow-up, or if the investigator deemed discontinuation in the patient's best interest. Randomisation was done centrally using stratified block randomisation (block size three), stratified by pathological grade, previous systemic antitumour treatment, and ECOG performance status score. Patients, investigators, research staff, and the sponsor study team were masked to treatment allocation. Crossover to surufatinib was permitted for patients in the placebo group with disease progression. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, which included all patients in randomisation. A pre-planned interim analysis was done at 70% of the predicted progression-free survival events. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02589821. FINDINGS: Between Feb 18, 2016, and Nov 11, 2019, of 264 patients who were screened, 172 (65%) patients were randomly assigned to receive surufatinib (n=113) or placebo (n=59). The median follow-up was 19·3 months (95% CI 9·3-19·4) in the surufatinib group and 11·1 months (5·7-35·9) in the placebo group. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 10·9 months (7·5-13·8) for surufatinib versus 3·7 months (2·8-5·6) for placebo (hazard ratio 0·49, 95% CI 0·32-0·76; p=0·0011). The trial met the early stopping criteria at the interim analysis and was terminated on recommendation from the independent data monitoring committee. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (43 [38%] of 113 with surufatinib vs four [7%] of 59 with placebo), proteinuria (11 [10%] vs one [2%]), and hypertriglyceridaemia (eight [7%] vs none). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 25 (22%) patients in the surufatinib group and four (7%) patients in the placebo group. There were three on-treatment deaths in the surufatinib group, including two deaths due to adverse events (gastrointestinal haemorrhage [possibly treatment-related] and cerebral haemorrhage [unlikely to be treatment-related]), and one death attributed to disease progression. One on-treatment death in the placebo group was attributed to disease progression. INTERPRETATION: Surufatinib significantly improves progression-free survival and has an acceptable safety profile in patients with progressive, advanced pancreatic NETs, and could be a potential treatment option in this patient population. FUNDING: Hutchison MediPharma.

Surufatinib in advanced extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (SANET-ep): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are limited. We investigated the efficacy and safety of surufatinib (HMPL-012, sulfatinib) in patients with extrapancreatic NETs. METHODS: SANET-ep was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial undertaken at 24 hospitals across China. Patients (aged 18 years or older) with unresectable or metastatic, well differentiated, extrapancreatic NETs, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and progression on no more than two types of previous systemic regimens were enrolled. Patients were centrally randomly assigned (2:1) using stratified block randomisation (block size 3) via an interactive web response system to receive oral surufatinib at 300 mg per day or matching placebo. Randomisation was stratified by tumour origin, pathological grade, and previous treatment. Patients, investigators, research staff and the sponsor study team were masked to treatment allocation. Crossover to the surufatinib group was allowed for patients in the placebo group at disease progression. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, which was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. A preplanned interim analysis was done at 70% of predicted progression-free survival events. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02588170. Follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Dec 9, 2015, and March 31, 2019, 198 patients were randomly assigned to surufatinib (n=129) or placebo (n=69). Median follow-up was 13·8 months (95% CI 11·1-16·7) in the surufatinib group and 16·6 months (9·2-not calculable) in the placebo group. Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 9·2 months (95% CI 7·4-11·1) in the surufatinib group versus 3·8 months (3·7-5·7) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·33; 95% CI 0·22-0·50; p<0·0001). As the trial met the predefined criteria for early discontinuation of the study at the interim analysis, the study was terminated early, as recommended by the independent data monitoring committee. The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were hypertension (47 [36%] of 129 patients in the surufatinib group vs nine [13%] of 68 patients in the placebo group) and proteinuria (25 [19%] vs zero). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 32 (25%) of 129 patients in the surufatinib group and nine (13%) of 68 patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in three patients in the surufatinib group (disseminated intravascular coagulation and hepatic encephalopathy, liver injury, and death with unknown reason) and one patient in the placebo group (cachexia and respiratory failure). INTERPRETATION: Progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients given surufatinib compared with patients given placebo, and surufatinib has a favourable benefit-to-risk profile in patients with progressive, advanced, well differentiated extrapancreatic NETs. Our results suggest that surufatinib might be a new treatment option for this population. FUNDING: Hutchison MediPharma.

Safety and efficacy of sintilimab combined with oxaliplatin/capecitabine as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in a phase Ib clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Sintilimab blocks the interaction between programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligands. The safety and efficacy of sintilimab combined with oxaliplatin/capecitabine (CapeOx) as first-line treatment were evaluated in patients with gastric (G)/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma in a phase Ib clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma without previous systemic treatment were enrolled as one cohort of a multi-cohort study. Sintilimab was administered at a dose of 200 mg intravenously (IV) in combination with CapeOx (1000 mg/m2 capecitabine orally, bid, D1-14 and 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin IV, D1) every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. After combination treatment, patients continued to receive sintilimab (200 mg) at 3 weekly intervals as maintenance therapy until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of informed consent, or for up to 24 months. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored to assess safety in terms of their frequency, intensity and causality. The efficacy endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was evaluated for its association with clinical response. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were enrolled and received sintilimab plus CapeOx. All patients reported treatment-related AEs (TRAEs). Grade 3-4 TRAEs were found in 11 (55.0%) patients. Seventeen patients obtained partial response and the ORR was 85.0% (95% CI: 62.1-96.8%). Three (15.0%) had stable disease and DCR was 100.0% (95% CI: 83.2-100.0%). As data cutoff of May 1, 2019, the median follow-up was 7.8 months. The median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI: 6.2-9.4) and median OS had not been reached. The OS rates at 6 months and 12 months were 100.0 and 68.0%. No association was observed between TMB and efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Sintilimab combined with CapeOx as first-line treatment demonstrated acceptable safety and promising efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02937116 . Registered 8 October 2016.

90-gene signature assay for tissue origin diagnosis of brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial tumors. 2-14% of BM patients present with unknown primary site despite intensive evaluations. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a 90-gene expression signature in determining the primary sites for BM samples. METHODS: The sequence-based gene expression profiles of 708 primary brain tumors (PBT) collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were analyzed by the 90-gene expression signature, with a similarity score for each of 21 common tumor types. We then used Optimal Binning algorithm to generate a threshold for separating PBT from BM. Eighteen PBT samples were analyzed to substantiate the reliability of the threshold. In addition, the performance of the 90-gene expression signature for molecular classification of metastatic brain tumors was validated in a cohort of 48 BM samples with the known origin. For each BM sample, the tumor type with the highest similarity score was considered tissue of origin. When a sample was diagnosed as PBT, but the similarity score below the threshold, the second prediction was considered as the primary site. RESULTS: A threshold of the similarity score, 70, was identified to discriminate PBT from BM (PBT: > 70, BM: ≤ 70) with an accuracy of 99% (703/708, 95% CI 98-100%). The 90-gene expression signature was further validated with 18 PBT and 44 BM samples. The results of 18 PBT samples matched reference diagnosis with a concordance rate of 100%, and all similarity scores were above the threshold. Of 44 BM samples, the 90-gene expression signature accurately predicted primary sites in 89% (39/44, 95% CI 75-96%) of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated the potential that the 90-gene expression signature could serve as a powerful tool for accurately identifying the primary sites of metastatic brain tumors.