RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical findings and postoperative follow-up data on remnant gastric cancer (RGC) are limited due to its rarity. Additionally, the preoperative staging, radical surgery, and managing recurrence in RGC present significant clinical challenges. METHODS: We analyzed the clinicopathological findings, adjuvant chemotherapy, and patterns of postoperative recurrence of 313 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery for RGC at 17 Japanese institutions. This study investigated the optimal management of RGC and the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Pathological stages I, II, and III were observed in 55.9% (N = 175), 24.9% (N = 78), and 19.2% (N = 60) of the patients, respectively. The overall concordance rate between clinical and pathological T staging was 58.3%, with a clinical T4 sensitivity of 41.4% for diagnosing pathological T4. During the median follow-up period of 4.6 years, disease recurrence occurred in 24.3% of patients. Most recurrences (over 80%) occurred within 2.5 years, and 96.1% within 5 years after RGC surgery. Peritoneal recurrence was the most common in patients with advanced RGC, accounting for 14.1% in stage II and 28.3% in stage III. Multivariable regression analysis showed that AC was significantly associated with a longer RFS, with a hazard ratio of 0.45 (95% confidence interval: 0.26-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores the importance of early detection, accurate preoperative staging, and postoperative surveillance in managing advanced RGC cases. Despite some limitations, our findings indicate that AC may provide survival benefits comparable to those seen in primary gastric cancer.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite growing evidence of the effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for primary gastric cancer, MIS for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) remains controversial due to the rarity of the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of MIS for radical resection of RGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with RGC who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2020 at 17 institutions were included, and a propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of MIS with open surgery. RESULTS: A total of 327 patients were included in this study and 186 patients were analyzed after matching. The risk ratios for overall and severe complications were 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45, 1.27] and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.32, 1.29), respectively. The MIS group had significantly less blood loss [mean difference (MD), -409 mL; 95% CI: -538, -281] and a shorter hospital stay (MD, -6.5 days; 95% CI: -13.1, 0.1) than the open surgery group. The median follow-up duration of this cohort was 4.6 years, and the 3-year overall survival were 77.9% and 76.2% in the MIS and open surgery groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.78; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.36]. The 3-year relapse-free survival were 71.9% and 62.2% in the MIS and open surgery groups, respectively (HR, 0.71; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.16). CONCLUSIONS: MIS for RGC showed favorable short- and long-term outcomes compared to open surgery. MIS is a promising option for radical surgery for RGC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Tiempo de Internación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The safety of robotic gastrectomy (RG) for gastric cancer in daily clinical settings and the process by which surgeons are introduced and taught RG remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of RG in daily clinical practice and assess the learning process in surgeons introduced to RG. METHODS: Patients who underwent RG for gastric cancer at Kyoto University and 12 affiliated hospitals across Japan from January 2017 to October 2019 were included. Any morbidity with a Clavien-Dindo classification grade of II or higher was evaluated. Moreover, the influence of the surgeon's accumulated RG experience on surgical outcomes and surgeon-reported postoperative fatigue were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 336 patients were included in this study. No conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery and no in-hospital mortality were observed. Overall, 50 (14.9%) patients developed morbidity. During the study period, 14 surgeons were introduced to robotic procedures. The initial five cases had surprisingly lower incidence of morbidity compared to the following cases (odds ratio 0.29), although their operative time was longer (+ 74.2 min) and surgeon's fatigue scores were higher (+ 18.4 out of 100 in visual analog scale). CONCLUSIONS: RG was safely performed in actual clinical settings. Although the initial case series had longer operative time and promoted greater levels of surgeon fatigue compared to subsequent cases, our results suggested that RG had been introduced safely.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Neoplasias Gástricas , Estudios de Cohortes , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Internal hernia (IH) is one of the critical complications after gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction, which can be prevented by closing mesenteric defects. However, only few studies have investigated the incidence of IH after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer till date. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of defect closure for the prevention of IH after LTG. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study collected data from 714 gastric cancer patients who underwent LTG with Rou-en-Y reconstruction between 2010 and 2016 in 13 hospitals. We evaluated the incidence of postoperative IH by comparing closure and non-closure groups of Petersen's defect, jejunojejunostomy mesenteric defect, and transverse mesenteric defect. RESULTS: The closure group for Petersen's defect included 609 cases, while the non-closure group included 105 cases. The incidence of postoperative IH in the closure group for Petersen's defect was significantly lower than it was in the non-closure group (0.5% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.001). The closure group for jejunojejunostomy mesenteric defect included 641 cases, while the non-closure group included 73 cases. The incidence of postoperative IH in the closure group of jejunojejunostomy mesenteric defect was significantly lower than that in the non-closure group (0.8% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.004). Out of 714 patients, 41 underwent retro-colic reconstruction. No patients in the transverse mesenteric defect group developed IH. CONCLUSION: Mesenteric defect closure after LTG with Roux-en-Y reconstruction may reduce postoperative IH incidence. Endoscopic surgeons should take great care to prevent IH by closing mesenteric defects.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Hernia Abdominal , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Neoplasias Gástricas , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Hernia Abdominal/cirugía , Humanos , Hernia Interna , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreaticojejunal (PJ) anastomosis occasionally fails several months after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with Child reconstruction and can ultimately result in a late-onset complete pancreaticocutaneous fistula (Lc-PF). Since the remnant pancreas is an isolated segment, surgical intervention is necessary to create internal drainage for the pancreatic juice; however, surgery at the previous PJ anastomosis site is technically challenging even for experienced surgeons. Here we describe a simple surgical procedure for Lc-PF, termed redo PJ anastomosis, which was developed at our facility. METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2020, six consecutive patients with Lc-PF after PD underwent a redo PJ anastomosis, and the short- and long-term clinical outcomes have been evaluated. The abdominal cavity is carefully dissected through a 10-cm midline skin incision, and the PJ anastomosis site is identified using a percutaneous drain through the fistula tract as a guide, along with the main pancreatic duct (MPD) stump on the pancreatic stump. Next, the pancreatic stump is deliberately immobilized from the dorsal plane to prevent injury to the underlying major vessels. After fixing a stent tube to both the MPD and the Roux-limb using two-sided purse-string sutures, the redo PJ anastomosis is completed using single-layer interrupted sutures. Full-thickness pancreatic sutures are deliberately avoided by passing the needle through only two-thirds of the anterior side of the pancreatic stump. RESULTS: The redo PJ anastomosis was performed without any intraoperative complications in all cases. The median intraoperative bleeding and operative time were 71 (range 10-137) mL and 123 (range 56-175) min, respectively. Even though a new mild pancreatic fistula developed postoperatively in all cases, it could be conservatively treated within 3 weeks, and no other postoperative complications were recorded. During the median follow-up period of 92 (range 12-112) months, no complications at the redo PJ anastomosis site were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This research shows that the redo PJ anastomosis for Lc-PF we developed is a safe, feasible, and technically no demanding procedure with acceptable short- and long-term clinical outcomes. This procedure has the potential to become the preferred treatment strategy for Lc-PF after PD.
Asunto(s)
Fístula , Pancreatoyeyunostomía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Niño , Humanos , Páncreas , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatoyeyunostomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Presently, there is no consensus as to what procedure of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (EJS) in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) is best to reduce postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of linear stapled reconstruction in terms of anastomotic-related complications for EJS in TLTG. METHODS: We collected data on 829 consecutive gastric cancer patients who underwent TLTG reconstructed by the Roux-en-Y method with radical lymphadenectomy between January 2010 and December 2016 in 13 hospitals. The patients were divided into two groups according to reconstruction method and matched by propensity score. Postoperative EJS-related complications were compared between the linear stapler (LS) and the circular stapler (CS) groups. RESULTS: After matching, data from 196 patients in each group were analyzed. The overall incidence of EJS-related complications was significantly lower in the LS group than in the CS group (4.1% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.008). The incidence of EJS anastomotic stenosis during the first year after surgery was significantly lower in the LS group than in the CS group (1.5% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.011). The incidence of EJS bleeding did not differ significantly between the groups, although no bleeding was observed in the LS group (0% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.123). The incidence of EJS leakage did not differ significantly between the groups (2.6% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.771). CONCLUSION: The use of linear stapled reconstruction is safer than the use of circular stapled reconstruction for intracorporeal EJS in TLTG because of its lower risks of stenosis.
Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Esofagoplastia/métodos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Puntaje de Propensión , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Cancerous involvement of a ureter is sometimes encountered in pelvic surgery for malignancy. We usually perform transureteroureterostomy (TUU) in cases of unilateral lower ureteral cancerous involvement. We report the outcomes in patients treated with TUU in our institute. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 11 patients who underwent TUU between June 2006 and September 2015. RESULTS: The primary disease was colon cancer in five patients, rectal cancer in four, and uterine cervical cancer and ovarian cancer in one patient each. Early postoperative complications relevant to TUU occurred in four patients; however, three patients were managed conservatively and recovered quickly. Only one patient developed ureteral obstruction, which resulted from anastomotic hematoma. Follow-up periods ranged from 5 to 78 months with a median of 28 months. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate before and after TUU was 59 ml/min (range, 31-90 ml/min) and 62.0 ml/min (range, 43-127 mL/min), respectively. No patients experienced worsening of their renal function or recurrent urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term outcomes are good and long-term renal function is maintained following TUU. TUU is considered a feasible technique for ureteral reconstruction for pelvic malignancy, and TUU has great potential in the era of multimodal therapy.
Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Uréter/cirugía , Ureterostomía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is a reasonable surgical approach for tumor-free margin resection and systemic lymph node clearance. In pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA)-first approach (or the "artery-first approach") has become the standard procedure. With improvements in laparoscopic instruments and techniques, some surgeons attempted to apply laparoscopic RAMPS (L-RAMPS) for carefully selected patients with left-sided PDAC. However, owing to several technical difficulties in this procedure, its application remains uncommon. Moreover, the artery-first approach in L-RAMPS has not been reported. Here, we developed the artery-first approach L-RAMPS for left-sided PDAC and have presented the same in this report. CASE PRESENTATION: Between June 2014 and July 2015, 16 patients with left-sided PDAC were referred to our division for pancreatic resection. The following technique was used for performing L-RAMPS on 3 of the 16 patients (19%). Six trocars were placed. After opening the omental bursa, only the middle segment of the pancreas was initially separated from both the left renal vein and the SMA. We termed this procedure as the "artery-first approach using a dome-shaped dorsomedial dissection (3D) technique." This 3D technique enabled the interruption of the entire arterial supply to the specimen while preserving the venous drainage through the splenic vein for preventing venous congestion. The technique also contributed to the early detection of no tumor infiltration into the SMA and the early determination of posterior dissection plane. After pancreatic neck transection, the splenic artery and vein were divided. Finally, the pancreatic tail and spleen were dissected in a right-to-left direction. All operations were completed without any intraoperative complications. The median blood loss and retrieved lymph node count were 75 mL and 37, respectively, which were superior to those reported by other previous studies on L-RAMPS. All resection margins were free of carcinoma. No severe postoperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The artery-first approach L-RAMPS using 3D technique is safe and feasible to perform. The significance of our proposed procedure is minimal blood loss and precise lymphadenectomy. Therefore, this novel technique may become the preferred treatment for left-sided PDAC in selected cases.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Disección/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Disección/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Páncreas/irrigación sanguínea , Páncreas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Selección de Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgeons, in general, underestimate the replaced left hepatic artery (rLHA) that arises from the left gastric artery (LGA), compared with the replaced right hepatic artery (rRHA), especially in standard gastric cancer surgery. During pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), preservation of the rRHA arising from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is widely accepted to prevent critical postoperative complications, such as liver necrosis, bile duct ischemia, and biliary anastomotic leakage. In contrast, details of complication onset following rLHA resection remain unknown. We report two cases of postoperative liver necrosis shortly after rLHA resection during PD for advanced gastric cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: Both cases had advanced gastric cancer with infiltration of the pancreatic head. In case 1, the rLHA comprised segment 2/3 artery (A2 + A3), which arose from the LGA. The rRHA originated from the SMA, and the segment 4 artery (A4) was a branch of the rRHA. We conducted PD with combined en bloc resection of both the rLHA and rRHA, and anastomosis between the distal and proximal stumps of the rRHA and LGA, respectively. The divided A2 + A3 was not reconstructed. In case 2, the rLHA comprised segment 2 artery (A2) only, which arose from the LGA. The segment 3/4 artery and the RHAs originated from the proper hepatic artery. We undertook PD with combined en bloc resection of A2 without vascular reconstruction. In both patients, serious necrosis of the lateral segment of the liver occurred within 6 days after PD. Case 1 recovered with conservative management, whereas case 2 required lateral segmentectomy of the liver. Pathologically, the necrotic area in case 2 was apparently circumscribed and confined to segment 2 of the liver, potentially implicating rLHA resection during PD as causing hepatic necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: During PD, rLHA resection can cause serious liver necrosis. Therefore, this artery should be preserved as far as oncologically acceptable. In cases that require rLHA resection during PD due to tumor conditions, surgeons should carefully monitor postoperative course while keeping in mind the possible necessity of urgent hepatectomy.
Asunto(s)
Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Hepatopatías/patología , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anciano , Femenino , Arteria Hepática/patología , Humanos , Hepatopatías/etiología , Masculino , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study sought to clarify the clinical benefits of liver resection after downsizing systemic chemotherapy for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: Survival and clinical characteristics of CLM patients who underwent resection between January 2001 and December 2013 were retrospectively assessed. The study cohort of 88 patients with limited liver disease who underwent curative liver resection comprised 34 with initially resectable synchronous disease (synchronous group), 38 with initially resectable metachronous disease (metachronous group), and 16 with initially unresectable converted disease (conversion group). RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up for the overall study population was 33 (1-98) months. Overall survival (OS) in the conversion group was not significantly different from that in the other groups. However, disease-free survival (DFS) in the conversion group was significantly shorter than that in the synchronous group. The median DFS was 19.1 months in the synchronous group, 16.6 months in the metachronous group, and 15.3 months in the conversion group. Most patients in the conversion group had recurrence shortly after liver resection in the remnant liver with or without metastases at other sites, but many could undergo repeat hepatectomy or resection of the metastases at other sites. CONCLUSIONS: Although the converted patients tended to have recurrence shortly after liver resection, survival could be prolonged by repeat hepatectomy or resection of metastases at other sites. Liver resection after downsizing chemotherapy appears to be efficacious for patients with initially unresectable CLM and may result in long-term outcomes equivalent to those of patients with initially resectable CLM.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In cases of remnantgastric cancer (RGC) with previous lymphadenectomy, laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is still uncommon because of the technical difficulties associated with adhesions from previous gastric cancer surgery and variations in anastomotic reconstruction. Here we demonstrate our procedure of LTG for RGC following distal gastrectomy (DG) with radical lymphadenectomy and review its clinical results. METHODOLOGY: From October 2008 to June 2014, we carried out three consecutive LTGs for RGC with previous lymphadenectomy. All cases had a past history of primary gastric cancer that had required open or laparoscopic DG with D2 radical lymphadenectomy. The preoperative TNM statuses of RGC were all cT1N0M0. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent LTG without open conversion or intraoperative complications. The median operative duration was 360 min; the median blood loss was 45 mL. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 23. No complications occurred postoperatively, and the median length of postoperative hospitalization was 20 days. The pathological TNM statuses of the RGC were all T1N0M0. Resection margins were negative in all cases (R0). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel procedure of LTG for RGC following DG with radical lymphadenectomy is technically acceptable, safe, and feasible.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/métodos , Muñón Gástrico/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Muñón Gástrico/patología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tempo Operativo , Reoperación , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy represents the most difficult step during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). A novel technique for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy was recently developed and named the "overlap method." However, this procedure is thought to have some technical disadvantages. To facilitate intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy, we developed some modifications for the overlap method. METHODOLOGY: From October 2009 to July 2013, 63 consecutive patients with gastric cancer underwent LTG at our institution. Our modified overlap method was used for 54 patients with the following modifications. First, the esophagus was transected while being rotated by approximately 90 degrees in the clockwise direction. Second, an endoscopic linear stapler was used through the right lower trocar to create a side-to-side esophagojejunostomy. Third, the entry hole of the linear stapler was closed with intracorporeal hand-sewn continuous suturing. This procedure was termed the "modified overlap method." RESULTS: In 53 patients with the exception of one case, the modified overlap method was successfully completed (98.1%). Only one patient developed esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage (1.9%), which recovered well with conservative management. No postoperative anastomotic stricture or bleeding occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified overlap method for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy provides amazingly satisfactory outcomes. We believe this procedure could become a standard method for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after LTG.
Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Grapado Quirúrgico/métodos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Masculino , Grapado Quirúrgico/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: The optimal reconstruction method for laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) remains controversial. The present study aimed to compare short-term outcomes, including assessment of nutritional parameters and skeletal muscle, between two different methods, double-tract reconstruction (DTR) versus esophagogastrostomy (EG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients who underwent LPG for gastric tumor(s) between 2018 and 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two group: DTR (n=11) and EG (n=17). Since 2020, the authors have applied the modified side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita (mSOFY) method as the EG technique. RESULTS: Compared with DTR, EG was associated with a shorter reconstruction time (p=0.003). Complications of grade ≥3 occurred only in the EG group [n=4 (23.5%)] and the incidence of abnormal endoscopic findings after surgery was numerically higher in the EG group (n=2 vs. n=9; p=0.047). Across virtually all data points on the line graph, the EG group exhibited greater changes in post-discharge nutritional parameters, with Skeletal Muscle Index also demonstrating significant superiority (0.83 vs. 0.89; p=0.045). CONCLUSION: Among reconstruction methods for LPG, EG demonstrated superiority over DTR in preserving nutritional parameters and skeletal muscle mass. However, further research, including larger cohorts and longer-term follow-up, is necessary to validate this finding.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Gastrostomía , Laparoscopía , Músculo Esquelético , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculo Esquelético/cirugía , Anciano , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Gastrostomía/métodos , Gastrostomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estado Nutricional , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a standard treatment strategy for gastric cancer (GC); however, the clinical impact of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) on survival outcomes remains unclear. We compared the short- and long-term results of LTG with those of open total gastrectomy (OTG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for Stage I/II/III GC between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into those undergoing LTG (n=143, LTG group) and OTG (n=173, OTG group). The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: The LTG group exhibited a higher prevalence of early T and N factors, with pStage I/II/III distribution skewed toward early-stage in a ratio of 86/24/33 compared to 38/65/69 in the OTG group (p<0.001), respectively. Longer operation time (p<0.001), less blood loss (p<0.001), fewer grade 3-4 complications (p<0.001), and shorter hospital stay (p<0.001) were observed in the LTG than in the OTG group. LTG was associated with survival benefits for patients without indication for adjuvant chemotherapy [5-year RFS rate, 96.3% vs. 73.2%; hazard ratio (HR)=0.24; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.10-0.56; p<0.001]. Among the eligibility criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy (Stage II/III excluding pT1 and pT3N0), while the LTG group received more frequently doublet-agent administration (56.5% vs. 11%, p<0.001), conversely, the OTG group exhibited slightly better long-term survival rates (5-year RFS rate, 33.9% vs. 50.2%; HR=1.31; 95%CI=0.82-2.10; p=0.251). CONCLUSION: LTG contributed to favorable short-term outcomes and demonstrated improved long-term outcomes in early-stage GC; however, careful consideration of indications is warranted for advanced GC cases.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Body weight loss (BWL) after gastrectomy impact on the short- and long-term outcomes. Oral nutritional supplement (ONS) has potential to prevent BWL in patients after gastrectomy. However, there is no consistent evidence supporting the beneficial effects of ONS on BWL, muscle strength and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ONS formulated primarily with carbohydrate and protein on BWL, muscle strength, and HRQoL. METHODS: This will be a multicenter, open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial in patients with gastric cancer who will undergo gastrectomy. A total of 120 patients who will undergo gastrectomy will be randomly assigned to the ONS group or usual care (control) group in a 1:1 ratio. The stratification factors will be the clinical stage (I or ≥ II) and surgical procedures (total gastrectomy or other procedure). In the ONS group, the patients will receive 400 kcal (400 ml)/day of ONS from postoperative day 5 to 7, and the intervention will continue postoperatively for 8 weeks. The control group patients will be given a regular diet. The primary outcome will be the percentage of BWL (%BWL) from baseline to 8 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes will be muscle strength (handgrip strength), HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-OG25, EQ-5D-5L), nutritional status (hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, albumin), and dietary intake. All analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence showing whether or not ONS with simple nutritional ingredients can improve patient adherence and HRQoL by reducing BWL after gastrectomy. If supported by the study results, nutritional support with simple nutrients will be recommended to patients after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCTs051230012; Japan Registry of Clinical Trails. Registered on Apr. 13, 2023.
Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Gastrectomía , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de Peso , Administración Oral , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano , Estado Nutricional , Factores de Tiempo , Fuerza de la Mano , Fuerza MuscularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: The impact of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), a standard gastric cancer (GC) management strategy, in advanced GC cases involving doublet adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. This study was aimed at comparing short- and long-term LG and open gastrectomy (OG) results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for stage II/III GC between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients undergoing LG (n=96, LG-group) and OG (n=148, OG-group). The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Compared with the OG group, the LG group was associated with a longer operation time (373 vs. 314 min, p<0.001), less blood loss (50 vs. 448 ml, p<0.001), fewer grade 3-4 complications (5.2 vs. 17.1%, p=0.005), and a shorter hospital stay (12 vs. 15 days, p<0.001). More lymph nodes were dissected in the LG group (49 vs. 40, p<0.001). The intergroup difference in prognosis was insignificant [5-year RFS: 60.4% (LG) vs. 63.1% (OG), p=0.825]. The LG group more frequently received doublet adjuvant chemotherapy (46.8 vs. 12.7%, p<0.001) and started treatments within 6 weeks after surgery (71.1% vs. 38.9%, p=0.017), and the completion rate of doublet AC was significantly higher in the LG group (85.4% vs. 58.8%, p=0.027). Compared to OG, LG for stage III GC tended to be associated with improved prognosis (HR=0.61, 95%CI=0.33-1.09, p=0.096). CONCLUSION: LG for advanced GC may facilitate doublet regimens due to favorable postoperative outcomes and its intervention may contribute to survival benefits.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Gastrectomía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)has been recognized as an important option for improving the clinical outcome of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, convincing evidence that it prolongs life and brings about a good prognosis are both lacking. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of NAC in ten patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of ten patients with advanced gastric cancer, who received NAC with the combination of S-1 and cisplatin in our hospital from April 2008 to March 2010, were retrospectively investigated. RESULTS: A total of 5 patients responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 2 patients showed a complete regression of the primary gastric carcinoma. Four of the 5 patients who responded had solid-type poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: NAC with the combination of S-1 and cisplatin was suggested to be effective for advanced gastric carcinoma, especially for solid-type poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas(por1).