Unilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy: A Study That Challenges the Dogma.

PURPOSE: Bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy is the current standard of care if pelvic lymph node dissection is indicated; often, however, pelvic lymph node dissection is performed in pN0 disease. With the more accurate staging achieved with magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis, the indication for bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection may be revised. We aimed to assess the feasibility of unilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection in the era of modern prostate cancer imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a multi-institutional data set of men with cN0 disease diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy who underwent prostatectomy and bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection. The outcome of the study was lymph node invasion contralateral to the prostatic lobe with worse disease features, ie, dominant lobe. Logistic regression to predict lymph node invasion contralateral to the dominant lobe was generated and internally validated. RESULTS: Overall, data from 2,253 patients were considered. Lymph node invasion was documented in 302 (13%) patients; 83 (4%) patients had lymph node invasion contralateral to the dominant prostatic lobe. A model including prostate-specific antigen, maximum diameter of the index lesion, seminal vesicle invasion on magnetic resonance imaging, International Society of Urological Pathology grade in the nondominant side, and percentage of positive cores in the nondominant side achieved an area under the curve of 84% after internal validation. With a cutoff of contralateral lymph node invasion of 1%, 602 (27%) contralateral pelvic lymph node dissections would be omitted with only 1 (1.2%) lymph node invasion missed. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic lymph node dissection could be omitted contralateral to the prostate lobe with worse disease features in selected patients. We propose a model that can help avoid contralateral pelvic lymph node dissection in almost one-third of cases.

Urology: a trip into metaverse.

PURPOSE: Metaverse is becoming an alternative world in which technology and virtual experiences are mixed with real life, and it holds the promise of changing our way of living. Healthcare is already changing thanks to Metaverse and its numerous applications. In particular, Urology and urologic patients can benefit in many ways from Metaverse. METHODS: A non-systematic literature review identified recently published studies dealing with Metaverse. The database used for this review was PubMed, and the identified studies served as the base for a narrative analysis of the literature that explored the use of Metaverse in Urology. RESULTS: Virtual consultations can enhance access to care and reduce distance and costs, and pain management and rehabilitation can find an incredible support in virtual reality, reducing anxiety and stress and improving adherence to therapy. Metaverse has the biggest potential in urologic surgery, where it can revolutionize both surgery planning, with 3D modeling and virtual surgeries, and intraoperatively, with augmented reality and artificial intelligence. Med Schools can implement Metaverse in anatomy and surgery lectures, providing an immersive environment for learning, and residents can use this platform for learning in a safe space at their own pace. However, there are also potential challenges and ethical concerns associated with the use of the metaverse in healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides an overview of the concept of the metaverse, its potential applications, challenges, and opportunities, and discusses the implications of its development in Urology.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local staging before salvage radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a local and nodal staging tool in radio-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) is still unclear. The present study aims at evaluating the predictive value of MRI in the detection of extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesical invasion (SVI) and nodal involvement (LNI) in patients after primary radio (EBRT) and/or brachytherapy (BT) before salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP). METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systemically reviewed to extract the data on diagnostic performance of MRI in radio-recurrent PCa. RESULTS: Four studies comprising 94 radio-recurrent PCa patients were included. The pooled prevalence of ECE, SVI, and LNI was 61%, 41%, and 20%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity for ECE, SVI and LNI detection was 53% (CI 95% 19.8-83.6%), 53% (CI 95% 37.2-68%) and 33% (CI 95% 4.7-83.1%) respectively, whereas specificity was 75% (CI 95% 40.6-92.6%), 88% (CI 95% 71.7-95.9%) and 92% (CI 95% 79.6-96.8%). The sensitivity analysis revealed that a single outlying study using only T2-weighted imaging instead of multiparametric MRI reported significantly higher sensitivity with significantly lower specificity. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis reporting reliability of staging MRI in a radio-recurrent setting. MRI provides poor sensitivity while maintaining high specificity for local and nodal staging before SRP. However, current evidence is limited to the low number of heterogenous studies at meaningful risk of bias.

Role of targeted biopsy, perilesional biopsy, and random biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis by mpMRI/transrectal ultrasonography fusion biopsy.

PURPOSE: It is still not clear the role of perilesional biopsy (PL) and the extension of the random biopsy (RB) scheme to be adopted during mpMRI-guided ultrasound fusion biopsy (FB). To evaluate the increase in diagnostic accuracy achieved by PL and different RB schemes over target biopsy (TB). METHODS: We collected prospectively 168 biopsy-naïve patients with positive mpMRI receiving FB and concurrent 24-core RB. The diagnostic yields of the different possible biopsy schemes (TB only; TB + 4 PL cores; TB + 12-core RB; TB + 24-core RB) were compared by the McNemar test. Clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer (PCA) was defined according to the definition of the PROMIS trial. Regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of the presence of any cancer, csPCA. RESULTS: The detection rate of CS cancers increased to 35%, 45%, and 49% by adding 4 PL cores, 12, and 24 RB cores, respectively (all p < 0.02). Notably, the largest scheme including 3 TB and 24 RB cores identified a small but statistically significant 4% increase in detection rate of CS cancer, as compared with the second largest scheme. TB alone identified only 62% of the CS cancers. Such figure increased to 72% by adding 4 PL cores, and to 91% by adding 14 RB cores. CONCLUSIONS: We found that PL biopsy increased the detection rate of CS cancers as compared with TB alone. However, the combination of those cores missed about 30% of the CS cancers identified with larger RB cores, notably including a considerable 15% of cases located contralaterally to the index tumor.

Risk and predictors of adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with IUSP 1-2 prostate cancer at MRI-targeted biopsy: a multicenter analysis.

PURPOSE: Although active surveillance (AS) is recommended for low- to favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), risk of upgrading at radical prostatectomy (RP) is not negligible. Available studies based on systematic transrectal ultrasound biopsy might not be applicable to contemporary cohorts diagnosed with MRI-targeted biopsy (TB). The aim of the present study is to explore rates and risk factors for adverse outcomes (AO) at RP in patients with ISUP ≤ 2 PCa detected at TB with concomitant systematic biopsy (SB). METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective analysis of 475 consecutive patients with ISUP ≤ 2 PCa at MRI-TB + SB is treated with RP. AO were defined as ISUP upgrading, adverse pathology (upgrading to ISUP ≥ 3 and/or ≥ pT3 at RP, and/or pN1) (AP) or biochemical recurrence (BCR) in men with follow-up (n = 327). RESULTS: The rate of ISUP upgrading, upgrading ≥ 3, and AP were 39%, 21%, and 43%. Compared to ISUP2, men with ISUP1 PCa had a higher rate of overall upgrading (27 vs. 67%, p < 0.001), but less upgrading to ≥ 3 (27 vs. 10%, p < 0.001). AP was more common when ISUP2 was detected with a combined MRI-TB + SB approach compared to considering TB (p = 0.02) or SB (p = 0.01) alone. PSA, PSA density, PI-RADS, ISUP at TB, overall biopsy ISUP and EAU classification were predictors of upgrading to ISUP ≥ 3 and AP. The 1 year BCR-free survival was 94% with no differences in BCR rates between subgroups. CONCLUSION: Upgrading in ISUP ≤ 2 PCa remains prevalent even in men diagnosed in the MRI era. The use of MRI-TB with concomitant SB allows for the accurate identification of ISUP2 PCa and predicts the risk of AO at RP.

The impact of a second MRI and re-biopsy in patients with initial negative mpMRI-targeted and systematic biopsy for PIRADS ≥ 3 lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportions of detected prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa), as well as identify clinical predictors of PCa, in patients with PI-RADS > = 3 lesion at mpMRI and initial negative targeted and systematic biopsy (initial biopsy) who underwent a second MRI and a re-biopsy. METHODS: A total of 290 patients from 10 tertiary referral centers were included. The primary outcome measures were the presence of PCa and csPCa at re-biopsy. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of PCa and csPCa, adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Forty-two percentage of patients exhibited the presence of a new lesion. Furthermore, at the second MRI, patients showed stable, upgrading, and downgrading PI-RADS lesions in 42%, 39%, and 19%, respectively. The interval from the initial to repeated mpMRI and from the initial to repeated biopsy was 16 mo (IQR 12-20) and 18 mo (IQR 12-21), respectively. One hundred and eight patients (37.2%) were diagnosed with PCa and 74 (25.5%) with csPCa at re-biopsy. The presence of ASAP on the initial biopsy strongly predicted the presence of PCa and csPCa at re-biopsy. Furthermore, PI-RADS scores at the first and second MRI and a higher number of systematic biopsy cores at first and second biopsy were independent predictors of the presence of PCa and csPCa. Selection bias cannot be ruled out. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent PI-RADS ≥ 3 at the second MRI is suggestive of the presence of a not negligible proportion of csPca. These findings contribute to the refinement of risk stratification for men with initial negative MRI-TBx.

Role of radiomic analysis of [18F]fluoromethylcholine PET/CT in predicting biochemical recurrence in a cohort of intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients at initial staging.

AIM: To study the feasibility of radiomic analysis of baseline [18F]fluoromethylcholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the prediction of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in a cohort of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-four patients were prospectively collected. We analyzed three prostate gland (PG) segmentations (i.e., PGwhole: whole PG; PG41%: prostate having standardized uptake value - SUV > 0.41*SUVmax; PG2.5: prostate having SUV > 2.5) together with three SUV discretization steps (i.e., 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6). For each segmentation/discretization step, we trained a logistic regression model to predict BCR using radiomic and/or clinical features. RESULTS: The median baseline prostate-specific antigen was 11 ng/mL, the Gleason score was > 7 for 54% of patients, and the clinical stage was T1/T2 for 89% and T3 for 9% of patients. The baseline clinical model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.73. Performances improved when clinical data were combined with radiomic features, in particular for PG2.5 and 0.4 discretization, for which the median test AUC was 0.78. CONCLUSION: Radiomics reinforces clinical parameters in predicting BCR in intermediate and high-risk PCa patients. These first data strongly encourage further investigations on the use of radiomic analysis to identify patients at risk of BCR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The application of AI combined with radiomic analysis of [18F]fluoromethylcholine PET/CT images has proven to be a promising tool to stratify patients with intermediate or high-risk PCa in order to predict biochemical recurrence and tailor the best treatment options. KEY POINTS: • Stratification of patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer at risk of biochemical recurrence before initial treatment would help determine the optimal curative strategy. • Artificial intelligence combined with radiomic analysis of [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT images allows prediction of biochemical recurrence, especially when radiomic features are complemented with patients' clinical information (highest median AUC of 0.78). • Radiomics reinforces the information of conventional clinical parameters (i.e., Gleason score and initial prostate-specific antigen level) in predicting biochemical recurrence.

Optimal combination therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: new evidence, challenges and unanswered questions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the evidence supporting treatment intensification in mHSPC, with a focus on possible indications for treatment in each clinical setting. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a growing armamentarium of treatment options for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). These include combinations of treatments such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), docetaxel, and new antiandrogenic therapies. Treatment intensification with chemotherapy or newer hormonal agents may improve patient's oncologic outcomes, but it can also come with additional toxicities and costs. Therefore, we need to take into account individual patient factors and preferences when deciding on the optimal combination therapy. Additionally, ongoing research is needed to identify biomarkers and new image techniques that can predict response to treatment and identify the best candidate for each treatment. SUMMARY: Challenges and unanswered questions regarding treatment intensification and de-intensification are still present. Further studies are still needed to identify which patients would benefit most from this approach to improve quality of life without compromising overall survival outcomes.

Detection rate of 18F-Choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with non-metastatic hormone sensitive and castrate resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: To assess the detection rate of 18F-choline PET/CT in non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (hsPCa) and non-metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPCa), based on the criteria proposed in the phase III SPARTAN trial and with high Gleason Score (GS). METHODS: Between October 2008 and September 2019, data from a retrospective multicenter study (N.=4 centers), involving patients undergoing 18F-choline PET/CT scans for a biochemical recurrence of PCa, were collected. The following inclusion criteria were used: 1) histologically proven PCa; 2) a non-metastatic disease in accordance with conventional imaging findings; 3) a PSA doubling time (PSAdt) <10 months; 4) a GS>8; and 5) no pelvic node>2 cm. The group of hsPCa and CRPCa patients, were compared by using a non-parametric statistical analysis. Moreover, a logistic regression analysis and ROC curves were used. RESULTS: One hundred forty patients were included. Of these, 82 patients were affected by hsPCa, and 58 had a CRPCa. Overall, 18F-Choline PET/CT was positive in 99/140 (70.7%). It was positive in 55/82 (67.1%) hsPCa patients and in 44/58 (75.9%) CRPCa subjects, respectively. The site of recurrence at 18F-Choline PET/CT were: 16 (27.6%) and 20 (24.4%) in prostatic bed, 25 (43.1%) and 24 (29.3%) in loco-regional lymph nodes and in 27 (46.6%) and 28 (34.1%) in distant organs, respectively for CRPCa and hsPCa patients. The optimal cut-off values for PSA at the time of PET/CT for the prediction or recurrence were 0.5 vs. 2.5 ng/mL for all site of recurrence (AUC: 0.70 vs. 0.72), 0.48 vs. 3.4 ng/mL for prostatic bed (AUC: 0.60 vs. 0.59), 0.5 vs. 1.5 for loco-regional lymph nodes (AUC: 0.62 vs. 0.57) and 2.2 vs. 2.8 ng/mL for distant metastasis (AUC: 0.74 vs. 0.71), respectively in CRPCa and hsPCa (all P=NS). Sensitivities and specificities of 18F-Choline PET/CT for the identification of recurrence disease in all patient population, in hsPCa and CRPCa were 83.7% and 87.5%, 78.9% and 88.9%, 91.4% and 85.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of positive 18F-Choline PET/CT is similar in patients with a hsPCa and CRPCa, in case of low PSAdt and high GS. Therefore, non-metastatic PCa patients should be assessed by molecular imaging, in order to adapt the most appropriate therapeutic approach.

An Algorithm to Personalize Nerve Sparing in Men with Unilateral High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Current guidelines do not provide strong recommendations on preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy in case of high-risk (HR) prostate cancer and/or suspicious extraprostatic extension (EPE). We aimed to evaluate when, in case of unilateral HR disease, contralateral nerve sparing (NS) should be considered or not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within a multi-institutional data set we selected patients with unilateral HR prostate cancer, defined as unilateral EPE and/or seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) on multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or unilateral International Society of Urologic Pathologists (ISUP) 4-5 or prostate specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml. To evaluate when to perform NS based on the risk of contralateral EPE, we relied on chi-square automated interaction detection, a recursive machine-learning partitioning algorithm developed to identify risk groups, which was fit to predict the presence of EPE on final pathology, contralaterally to the prostate lobe with HR disease. RESULTS: A total of 705 patients were identified. Contralateral EPE was documented in 87 patients (12%). Chi-square automated interaction detection identified 3 groups, consisting of 1) absence of SVI on mpMRI and index lesion diameter ≤15 mm, 2) index lesion diameter ≤15 mm and contralateral ISUP 2-3 or index lesion diameter >15 mm and negative contralateral biopsy or ISUP 1, and 3) SVI on mpMRI or index lesion diameter >15 mm and contralateral biopsy ISUP 2-3. We named those groups as low, intermediate and high-risk, respectively, for contralateral EPE. The rate of EPE and positive surgical margins across the groups were 4.8%, 14% and 26%, and 5.6%, 13% and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study challenges current guidelines by proving that wide bilateral excision in men with unilateral HR disease is not justified. Pending external validation, we propose performing NS and incremental NS in case of contralateral low and intermediate EPE risk, respectively.

The Detection of Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies is Superior with the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-Institutional Study.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate whether transperineal (TP) MRI-targeted prostate biopsy (TBx) may improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), defined as International Society of Urological Pathology ≥2, in comparison to transrectal (TR) TBx. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study comprising patients who underwent MRI-guided prostate biopsy was conducted. To address possible benefits of TP-TBx in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and csPCa, a cohort of patients undergoing TP-TBx were compared to patients undergoing TR-TBx. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess predictors of PCa and csPCa detection. RESULTS: Overall, 1,936 and 3,305 patients who underwent TR-TBx vs TP-TBx at 10 referral centers were enrolled. The rate of PCa and csPCa diagnosed was higher for TP-TBx vs TR-TBx (64.0% vs 50%, p <0.01 and 49% vs 35%, p <0.01). At multivariable analysis adjusted for age, biopsy naïve/repeated biopsy, cT stage, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System®, prostate volume, PSA, and number of biopsy cores targeted, TP-TBx was an independent predictor of PCa (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% CI 1.08-1.72) and csPCa (1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.50). When considering the approach according to the site of the index lesion, TP-TBx had a significantly higher likelihood than TR-TBx to detect csPCa in the apex (OR 4.81, 95% CI 1.03-6.27), transition/central zone (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.42-5.00), and anterior zone (OR 5.62, 95% CI 1.74-8.13). CONCLUSIONS: The use of TP-TBx allows a better cancer grade definition and PCa risk assessment. This has important implication in the decision-making process and in patient counseling for further therapies.

Features and management of men with pN1 cM0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy: a systematic review of population-based evidence.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To investigate the features and optimal management of pN+ cM0 prostate cancer (PCa) according to registry-based studies. RECENT FINDINGS: Up to 15% of PCa patients harbor lymph node invasion (pN+) at radical prostatectomy plus lymph node dissection. Nonetheless, the optimal management strategy in this setting is not well characterized. SUMMARY: We performed a systematic review including n = 13 studies. Management strategies comprised 13 536 men undergoing observation, 11 149 adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (aADT), 7,075 adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) +aADT and 705 aRT. Baseline features showed aggressive PCa in the majority of men. At a median follow-up ranging 48-134months, Cancer-related death was 5% and overall-mortality 16.6%. aADT and aRT alone had no cancer-specific survival or overall survival advantages over observation only and over not performing aRT, respectively. aADT plus aRT yielded a survival benefit compared to observation and aADT, which in one study, were limited to certain intermediate-risk categories. Age, Gleason, Charlson score, positive surgical margins, pathological stage, and positive nodes number, but not prostate specific antigen, were most relevant prognostic factors. Our work further confirmed pN+ PCa is a multifaceted disease and will help future research in defining its optimal management based on different risk categories to maximize survival and patient's quality of life.

PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: In recent years, the clinical availability of scanners for integrated positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled the practical potential of multimodal, combined metabolic-receptor, anatomical, and functional imaging to be explored. The present systematic review and meta-analysis summarize the diagnostic information provided by PET/MRI in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in three different databases. The terms used were "choline" or "prostate-specific membrane antigen - PSMA" AND "prostate cancer" or "prostate" AND "PET/MRI" or "PET MRI" or "PET-MRI" or "positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging." All relevant records identified were combined, and the full texts were retrieved. Reports were excluded if (1) they did not consider hybrid PET/MRI; or (2) the sample size was < 10 patients; or (3) the raw data were not enough to enable the completion of a 2 × 2 contingency table. RESULTS: Fifty articles were eligible for systematic review, and 23 for meta-analysis. The pooled data concerned 2104 patients. Initial disease staging was the main indication for PET/MRI in 24 studies. Radiolabeled PSMA was the tracer most frequently used. In primary tumors, the pooled sensitivity for the patient-based analysis was 94.9%. At restaging, the pooled detection rate was 80.9% and was higher for radiolabeled PSMA than for choline (81.8% and 77.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PET/MRI proved highly sensitive in detecting primary PCa, with a high detection rate for recurrent disease, particularly when radiolabeled PSMA was used.

The future of choline PET in the era of prostate specific membrane antigen.

Radiolabeled choline was the first radiopharmaceutical agent employed in prostate cancer patients. It has been considered a metabolic agent able to detect the presence of prostate cancer cell, both in the initial phase of the disease and in the restaging setting. Three agents are now available in clinical practice: one radiolabeled with 11C (called 11C-Choline) and two with 18F (either as 18F-methylcholine or 18F-ethylcholine). During the years, different studies have been performed with 11C -Choline and 18F-Choline demonstrating their performance for the detection of prostate cancer, in different settings of the disease. However, recently, new radiopharmaceutical agents for prostate cancer have been developed, gaining an important role for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, particularly in the restaging setting. The present review has been conceived in order to discuss the current role of radiolabeled choline PET/CT in the era of new agents for prostate cancer, in particular in the era of radiolabeled PSMA.

The effects of androgen deprivation therapy on the 18F-Chcoline uptake in prostate cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate how neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can impact 18F-choline uptake in primary prostate cancer (PC) and its metastases before radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed images of 79 PC patients undergoing 18F-choline PET/CT before RP or RT. Based on concomitant administration of neoadjuvant ADT at the time of 18F-choline PET/CT, patients were subdivided into naïve group (Group 1) and neoadjuvant ADT group (Group 2). PET/CT results, SUVmax and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for each site were re-assessed by two nuclear medicine physicians with more than 5 years of experience. A chi-square and a U-Mann Whitney test were used to compare the two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included in Group 1, while 17 in Group 2. PET/CT was positive in all patients, in particular: 54 had a significant uptake in prostate alone, 12 in prostate plus lymph nodes (LN), 4 in prostate plus LN and bone, 3 in prostate plus bone and 6 in prostate plus other organs (such as lung or thyroid). PET/CT was more frequently positive in a different site, outside the prostate, in Group 1 as compared to Group 2 (P<0.001). Conversely, median SUVmax and MTV in the prostate resulted significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 1 (5.34 vs. 7.72 and 3.66 vs. 6.86 cm3, respectively; both P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT could have an important role in prostate cancer staging before primary treatment; however, before imaging, hormonal therapy status should be carefully evaluated.

Perioperative Outcomes and Early Survival in Octogenarians Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative outcomes and early survival in a series of octogenarians who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion for bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical records of 44 patients aged ≥80 years who underwent open RC and urinary diversion at 2 high-volume centers between July 2013 and December 2015. Estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion rate, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were evaluated. Ninety-day postoperative complications were stratified according to the type of urinary diversion. Univariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of overall and major complications. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median age was 83 years (interquartile range [IQR] 81-85). Age-adjusted Charlson score was ≥4 in 37 (84%) patients, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score was ≥3 in 34 (77%) patients. Ileal conduit (IC) was performed in 21/44 (48%) cases, cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) in 20/44 (45%), and no urinary diversion was required for 3 (7%) dialytic patients. Median EBL was 700 mL (IQR 500-1,000) and 23 (52%) patients required blood transfusion. Median LOS was 13 days (IQR 10-18). Overall complications were recorded in 29 (66%) patients, with major complications observed in 12 (27%), with death occurring in 1. No differences in complications were observed between IC and CU. The 2-year OS estimate was 62.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Open RC in octogenarians has an acceptable rate of major complications and mortality. IC should be considered a good urinary diversion in these patients.

Vaginal cuff recurrence after radical cystectomy: an under - studied site of bladder cancer relapse.

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal cuff recurrence of tumor following radical cystectomy is a rare site of disease recurrence, however it has never been specifically studied. The aim of the study is to evaluate incidence, risk factors, and long-term oncologic outcomes of vaginal cuff recurrence in a cohort of female patients treated with radical cystectomy for invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1985 to 2012, a prospectively maintained institutional bladder cancer registry was queried for vaginal cuff recurrence post radical cystectomy. Overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method for patients with vaginal cuff recurrence, recurrence at another local or distant site, and those without evidence of recurrence. Comparisons were performed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to assess predictors of vaginal cuff recurrence. RESULTS: From 469 women treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, 34 patients (7.3%) developed vaginal cuff recurrence, 130 patients (27.7%) had recurrence involving either a local or distant site, and 305 patients (65%) had no evidence of recurrence. The 5-year overall mortality-free survival rate was 32.4% for vaginal cuff recurrence, but 25.0% for other sites of recurrence. Cancer-specific mortality-free survival rate was 32.4% for vaginal cuff recurrence, and 30.3% for the other sites of recurrence. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of tumor in posterior location at radical cystectomy (Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.353 [95% CI, 0.159-0.783]) and anterior vaginectomy, compared to no vaginectomy (HR, 2.595 [95% CI, 1.077-6.249]) were independently associated with vaginal cuff recurrence. CONCLUSION: Anterior vaginectomy, despite our best attempts, is perhaps not sufficient to prevent vaginal cuff recurrence. Therefore, follow-up evaluation is essential, and further studies are necessary to address the optimal approach for initial management. Patient Summary: Although vaginal cuff recurrence is an unusual site of recurrence, careful evaluation is needed before cystectomy and during follow-up to identify patients at risk.

Risk Stratification of pN+ Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy from a Large Single Institutional Series with Long-Term Followup.

PURPOSE: Lymph node positive (pN+) prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy has wide variability in long-term oncologic outcomes. We present a large institutional series with extended followup to create an oncologic risk stratification system that clarifies the prognostic heterogeneity for patients with pN+ disease after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with pN+ prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy during 1987 to 2012 were included in the study. Regression models were created to identify significant predictors of biochemical recurrence, metastasis, cancer specific mortality and overall mortality. A cancer specific mortality risk score was then created and internally validated to stratify patients in terms of risk of cancer specific mortality. RESULTS: For our cohort of 1,011 men with a median followup of 17.6 years the 20-year rate of cancer specific mortality was 31%. On multivariate Cox regression modeling 3 or more positive nodes (HR 1.75, p=0.003), pathological Gleason score 7 vs 6 (HR 1.74, p=0.04) and 8-10 vs 6 (HR 2.63, p=0.001), and positive surgical margins (HR 1.96, p=0.001) were significantly associated with increased cancer specific mortality, while adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.40, p=0.008) was associated with decreased cancer specific mortality. A cancer specific mortality risk score was then created using these 4 variables to stratify patients with markedly different prognoses, yielding 20-year cancer specific mortality rates of 19.1% vs 34% vs 46% (p <0.001) for low, intermediate and high risk categories, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of patients with pN+ prostate cancer varied significantly after radical prostatectomy. A risk score created using the number of positive nodes, pathological Gleason score, margin status and adjuvant radiotherapy status successfully separated patients into low, intermediate and high risk groups.