Substantial Diversity in Cocirculating Omicron Lineages in Hospital Setting, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

We describe substantial variant diversity among 23 detected SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineage viruses cocirculating among healthcare workers and inpatients (272 sequenced samples) from Porto Alegre, Brazil, during November 2022-January 2023. BQ.1 and related lineages (61.4%) were most common, followed by BE.9 (19.1%), first described in November 2022 in the Amazon region.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Free Plasma and Free Brain Concentrations of Ceftaroline in Healthy and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus-Infected Wistar Rats.

A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to describe alterations in ceftaroline brain disposition caused by meningitis in healthy and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-infected rats. Blood and brain microdialysate samples were obtained after a single bolus dose of ceftaroline fosamil (20 mg/kg) administered intravenously. Plasma data were modeled as one compartment, and brain data were added to the model as a second compartment, with bidirectional drug transport between plasma and brain (Qin and Qout). The cardiac output (CO) of the animals showed a significant correlation with the relative recovery (RR) of plasma microdialysis probes, with animals with greater CO presenting lower RR values. The Qin was approximately 60% higher in infected animals, leading to greater brain exposure to ceftaroline. Ceftaroline brain penetration was influenced by MRSA infection, increasing from 17% (Qin/Qout) in healthy animals to 27% in infected animals. Simulations of a 2-h intravenous infusion of 50 mg/kg every 8 h achieved >90% probability of target attainment (PTA) in plasma and brain for the modal MRSA MIC (0.25 mg/L), suggesting that the drug should be considered an option for treating central nervous system infections.

Convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in hospitalised patients: an open-label, randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The effects of convalescent plasma (CP) therapy in hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain uncertain. This study investigates the effect of CP on clinical improvement in these patients. METHODS: This is an investigator-initiated, randomised, parallel arm, open-label, superiority clinical trial. Patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to two infusions of CP plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with clinical improvement 28 days after enrolment. RESULTS: A total of 160 (80 in each arm) patients (66.3% critically ill, 33.7% severely ill) completed the trial. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) age was 60.5 (48-68) years; 58.1% were male and the median (IQR) time from symptom onset to randomisation was 10 (8-12) days. Neutralising antibody titres >1:80 were present in 133 (83.1%) patients at baseline. The proportion of patients with clinical improvement on day 28 was 61.3% in the CP+SOC group and 65.0% in the SOC group (difference -3.7%, 95% CI -18.8-11.3%). The results were similar in the severe and critically ill subgroups. There was no significant difference between CP+SOC and SOC groups in pre-specified secondary outcomes, including 28-day mortality, days alive and free of respiratory support and duration of invasive ventilatory support. Inflammatory and other laboratory marker values on days 3, 7 and 14 were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: CP+SOC did not result in a higher proportion of clinical improvement on day 28 in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 compared to SOC alone.

Double-, single- and none-carbapenem-containing regimens for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections: a retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of double-, single- and none-carbapenem-containing antimicrobial regimens in the treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2013 to 2020 in two Brazilian hospitals. Patients ≥18 years old with CRE BSI were included and excluded if death or treatment duration for ≤48 h after BSI or non-Class A-producing carbapenemase isolates. We evaluated the impact of different carbapenem-containing regimens on 30 day mortality through a propensity score adjusted model and a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Two-hundred and seventy-nine patients were included for analyses: 47 (16.9%), 149 (53.4%) and 83 (29.8%) were treated with double-, single- and none-carbapenem-containing regimens, respectively. One-hundred and seventeen (41.9%) patients died in 30 days. Treatment with a single-carbapenem regimen was associated with a lower risk of death in 30 days compared with therapies containing no carbapenem [adjusted HR (aHR) 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.99, P = 0.048], when adjusted for Charlson score and ICU admission at baseline, while double-carbapenem regimens were not associated with a lower risk of death (aHR 0.78, 95% CI 0.46-1.32, P = 0.35). Propensity score adjusted model results went in the same direction. CONCLUSIONS: Double-carbapenem- was not superior to single-carbapenem-containing regimens in patients with CRE BSIs. Single-carbapenem-containing schemes were associated with a lower mortality risk.

Comparable Efficacy and Better Safety of Double ß-Lactam Combination Therapy versus ß­Lactam plus Aminoglycoside in Gram-Negative Bacteria in Randomized, Controlled Trials.

There is a great need for efficacious therapies against Gram-negative bacteria. Double ß-lactam combination(s) (DBL) are relatively safe, and preclinical data are promising; however, their clinical role has not been well defined. We conducted a metaanalysis of the clinical and microbiological efficacy of DBL compared to ß-lactam plus aminoglycoside combinations (BLAG). PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register database were searched through July 2018. We included randomized controlled clinical trials that compared DBL with BLAG combinations. Clinical response was used as the primary outcome and microbiological response in Gram-negative bacteria as the secondary outcome; sensitivity analyses were performed for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp., and Escherichia coli Heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed. Safety results were classified by systems and organs. Thirteen studies evaluated 2,771 cases for clinical response and 665 cases for microbiological response in various Gram-negative species. DBL achieved slightly, but not significantly, better clinical response (risk ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.11) and microbiological response in Gram-negatives (risk ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.25) compared with BLAG. Sensitivity analyses by pathogen showed the same trend. No significant heterogeneity across studies was found. DBL was significantly safer than BLAG regarding renal toxicity (6.6% versus 8.8%, P = 0.0338) and ototoxicity (0.7 versus 3.1%, P = 0.0137). Other adverse events were largely comparable. Overall, empirically designed DBL showed comparable clinical and microbiological responses across different Gram-negative species, and were significantly safer than BLAG. Therefore, DBL should be rationally optimized via the latest translational approaches, leveraging mechanistic insights and newer ß-lactams for future evaluation in clinical trials.

Clinical Use of Polymyxin B.

Polymyxin B is another clinically available polymyxin that has re-emerged in clinical practice to treat infections caused by multi-drug (MDR) or extensively-drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Its chemical structure is very similar to the structure of polymyxin E (colistin). However, since the latter is administered as a prodrug, there are major pharmacokinetic differences between both polymyxins that may potentially determine different clinical and microbiological outcomes. Studies addressing clinical or microbiological outcomes in patients treated with polymyxin B for MDR or XDR GNB are reviewed in this chapter.

Severe Infusion-Related Adverse Events and Renal Failure in Patients Receiving High-Dose Intravenous Polymyxin B.

The use of very high doses of polymyxin B (PMB) against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has been addressed in in vitro experiments as a strategy to improve bacterial killing and suppress resistance emergence. However, the toxicities of very high doses in patients are unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort study assessing patients receiving PMB at >3 mg/kg of body weight/day or a total dose of ≥250 mg/day. The main outcomes were severe infusion-related adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and the renal failure category of RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury (AKI) during treatment. A total of 222 patients were included for analysis of infusion-related events. The mean PMB dose was 3.61 ± 0.97 mg/kg/day (median total dose/day = 268 mg). Severe infusion-related adverse events occurred in two patients, resulting in an incidence of 0.9% (95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 3.2%); one was classified as a life-threatening adverse event, and one was classified as a severe adverse event. Renal failure was analyzed in 115 patients, and 25 (21.7%) patients presented renal failure (54 [47.0%] developed any degree of AKI, categorized as risk [27.8%], injury [25.9%], and failure [46.3%]). Treatment with a vasoactive drug, concomitant treatment with nephrotoxic drugs, and baseline creatinine clearance were independent risk factors for renal failure. Neither the PMB daily dose scaled by body weight nor the total daily dose was associated with renal failure. The in-hospital mortality rate was 60% (134 patients): 26% of deaths (57 patients) occurred during treatment, and none occurred during infusion. Our data suggest that high-dose schemes have an acceptable safety profile and could be further tested in clinical trials assessing strategies to improve patient outcomes and minimize the emergence of PMB resistance.

Dissemination of blaOXA-370 is mediated by IncX plasmids and the Tn6435 transposon.

In Enterobacteriaceae, the blaOXA-48-like genes have been identified on plasmids in different regions of the world. The OXA-370 is a plasmid-encoded OXA-48-like enzyme reported in two distinct regions of Brazil. Recently, we demonstrate that the blaOXA-370 gene is disseminated among several Enterobacteriaceae species and clones, indicating a high potential for dissemination. In this work, we described for the first time the complete nucleotide sequence of six plasmids harboring the blaOXA-370 gene. Complete DNA sequencing using the Illumina platform and annotation of the plasmids showed that they belonged to incompatibility groups IncX and had in average 70 kbp. The blaOXA-370 gene is located in a composite transposon containing four genes encoding transposases, named Tn6435. In this study, highly similar plasmids were detected in different Enterobacteriaceae genera.

Nephrotoxicity of Polymyxins: Is There Any Difference between Colistimethate and Polymyxin B?

Nephrotoxicity is a common adverse effect of the clinically used polymyxins, colistin and polymyxin B. This adverse effect is dose limiting for both polymyxins, as the plasma polymyxin concentrations associated with renal damage overlap those required for antibacterial effect. Since development of acute kidney injury (AKI) during therapy is highly undesirable, it is extremely important to know whether there is any difference between the nephrotoxic potential of colistin (administered as its inefficient prodrug, colistimethate) and polymyxin B (administered as the active form). Both polymyxins are cytotoxic to renal tubular cells and are prone to cause nephrotoxicity in vivo because of the renal handling mechanisms that facilitate accumulation of these compounds in these cells, processes that are reviewed in this article. Also reviewed are the emerging data that strongly suggest significantly higher rates of AKI in patients treated with colistimethate compared to patients treated with polymyxin B. This finding may be due to differences in pharmacokinetics and renal handling mechanisms of colistimethate and formed colistin versus polymyxin B, and consequently the relative amount of polymyxin material delivered to tubular cells. A lower risk of AKI with polymyxin B is one of several potential advantages over colistimethate. The relative safety and efficacy of the two agents require closer examination in well-designed clinical studies.

Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Renal Failure in Patients Treated with Colistin versus Polymyxin B.

Nephrotoxicity is the main adverse effect of colistin and polymyxin B (PMB). It is not clear whether these two antibiotics are associated with different nephrotoxicity rates. We compared the incidences of renal failure (RF) in patients treated with colistimethate sodium (CMS) or PMB for ≥48 h. A multicenter prospective cohort study was performed that included patients aged ≥18 years. The primary outcome was renal failure (RF) according to Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage renal disease (RIFLE) criteria. Multivariate analysis with a Cox regression model was performed. A total of 491 patients were included: 81 in the CMS group and 410 in the PMB group. The mean daily doses in milligrams per kilogram of body weight were 4.2 ± 1.3 and 2.4 ± 0.73 of colistin base activity and PMB, respectively. The overall incidence of RF was 16.9% (83 patients): 38.3% and 12.7% in the CMS and PMB groups, respectively (P< 0.001). In multivariate analysis, CMS therapy was an independent risk factor for RF (hazard ratio, 3.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.05 to 5.48;P< 0.001) along with intensive care unit admission, higher weight, older age, and bloodstream and intraabdominal infections. CMS was also independently associated with a higher risk of RF in various subgroup analyses. The incidence of RF was higher in the CMS group regardless of the patient baseline creatinine clearance. The development of RF during therapy was not associated with 30-day mortality in multivariate analysis. CMS was associated with significantly higher rates of RF than those of PMB. Further studies are required to confirm our findings in other patient populations.

In vitro activity of polymyxin B plus imipenem, meropenem, or tigecycline against KPC-2-producing Enterobacteriaceae with high MICs for these antimicrobials.

We evaluated the in vitro activity of polymyxin B plus imipenem, meropenem, or tigecycline against six KPC-2-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains with high MICs for these antimicrobial agents. Polymyxin B with carbapenems, especially meropenem, were the most active combinations for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae regardless of the polymyxin B concentration used in the time-kill assay. This combination was also synergistic against two Serratia marcescens strains that are intrinsically resistant to polymyxins. Polymyxin B and tigecycline also presented synergistic activity in most experiments.

Polymyxin B in Combination with Antimicrobials Lacking In Vitro Activity versus Polymyxin B in Monotherapy in Critically Ill Patients with Acinetobacter baumannii or Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.

There is no clinical evidence supporting the use of polymyxin B in combination with another antimicrobial for infections caused by extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii or Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. We developed a cohort study of patients in two intensive care units from teaching hospitals to evaluate treatment with intravenous polymyxin B for ≥48 h for severe A. baumannii or P. aeruginosa infections. Covariates potentially associated with 30-day mortality were evaluated in a Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 101 patients were included; 33 (32.7%) were treated with polymyxin B in combination with an antimicrobial lacking in vitro activity and 68 (67.3%) with polymyxin B in monotherapy. The overall 30-day mortality was 59.4% (60 patients), comprising 42.4% (14 of 33) and 67.6% (46 of 68) in combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.03). The mortality rates were 18.5/1,000 patient days and 36.4/1,000 patient days in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Combination therapy was independently associated with lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.64; P = 0.001). Creatinine clearance of ≥60 ml/min was also a protective factor, while a higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score and polymicrobial infection were associated with increased mortality. The results did not change after adding a propensity score for prescribing combination therapy into the model. The protective effect remained when only combination with ß-lactam or carbapenem was considered and in both subgroups of patients: those with A. baumannii infection and those with lower respiratory tract infections. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study to show a benefit of combination over monotherapy with polymyxin B for severe extensively drug-resistant A. baumannii or P. aeruginosa infections.

Risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients treated with polymyxin B and influence of AKI on mortality: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients treated with polymyxin B, a last resort antibiotic against Gram-negative bacteria, with a focus on dose, and to determine the impact of AKI on mortality of these patients. METHODS: A multicentre prospective cohort study was performed including patients ≥18 years treated with intravenous polymyxin B for ≥48 h. The primary outcome was AKI defined by RIFLE criteria. Secondary outcomes were 30 day mortality and failure stage of AKI. Multivariate analysis with a Cox regression model was performed. The probability of developing AKI was determined in a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Four-hundred-and-ten patients were included. AKI occurred in 189 (46.1%) patients. Polymyxin B dose ≥150 mg/day was a risk factor for AKI: adjusted HR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.31-2.89, P = 0.01. Higher weight and age were also independently associated with AKI. The probability of developing AKI significantly increased with doses between 150 and 199 mg/day, regardless of patient weight, with no significant increase with higher doses. Higher weight also increased the risk in patients receiving the same daily doses. AKI was barely associated with increased risk for 30 day mortality (adjusted HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.99-1.85, P = 0.06), while ≥150 mg/day did not increase this risk despite its association with AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Polymyxin B total dose is highly related to the risk of AKI, regardless of patient weight. Thirty-day mortality tended to be higher in patients who developed AKI. The relationship between dose, AKI and mortality must be further investigated in studies specifically designed to evaluate this latter outcome.

Streptococcus pneumoniae appendicitis in an adult patient.

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a rare cause of appendicitis.We report apneumococcal appendicitis with secondary peritonitis in a human immunodeficiency virus­positive adult, with favorable outcome after surgery and antibiotic therapy. Secondary peritonitis is frequently complication of S pneumoniae appendicitis in the few reported cases,and no specific risk factor has been identified so far.

Effect of cefepime dose on mortality of patients with Gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: There are controversies regarding the association of cefepime therapy with increased mortality among patients with infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). We evaluated the effect of cefepime on the mortality of patients with GNB bloodstream infections (BSIs). METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in adult patients with creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL who received empirical therapy with cefepime for at least 48 h for BSIs caused by GNB. The outcome was hospital mortality. Potential clinical predictors, including a high-dose regimen (2 g every 8 h), were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients were included. Most (78.8%) isolates had low cefepime MICs (≤0.25 mg/L). The overall hospital mortality was 35.4% [25.6% (10/39) and 40.5% (30/74) in patients receiving high-dose and usual-dose cefepime, respectively (P = 0.17)]. In a Cox regression model adjusted for cefepime MIC and propensity score, a high-dose regimen was independently associated with lower mortality rates [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.91; P = 0.029] while presentation with severe sepsis or septic shock was independently associated with higher mortality rates (aHR 4.10; 95% CI 1.78-9.40; P = 0.001). A trend to lower mortality rates was also found in the subgroup analysis of patients who had not switched antibiotic during therapy after adjustment for the latter variables. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose cefepime therapy was associated with lower mortality rates in patients with GNB BSIs, even for GNB with low cefepime MICs.

A Randomized, Open-Label, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial Assessing 7 Versus 14 Days of Antimicrobial Therapy for Severe Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: The OPTIMISE Trial Protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Shorter courses of antimicrobials have been shown to be non-inferior to longer, "traditional" duration of therapies, including for some severe healthcare-associated infections, with a few exceptions. However, evidence is lacking regarding shorter regimes against severe infections by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB), which are often caused by distinct strains and commonly treated with second-line antimicrobials. In the duratiOn of theraPy in severe infecTIons by MultIdrug-reSistant gram-nEgative bacteria (OPTIMISE) trial, we aim to assess the non-inferiority of 7-day versus 14-day antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients with severe infections caused by MDR-GNB. METHODS: This is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel controlled trial to assess the non-inferiority of 7-day versus 14-day of adequate antimicrobial therapy for intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired severe infections by MDR-GNB. Adult patients with severe infections by MDR-GNB initiated after 48 h of ICU admission are screened for eligibility. Patients are eligible if they proved to be hemodynamically stable and without fever for at least 48 h on the 7th day of adequate antimicrobial therapy. After consenting, patients are 1:1 randomized to discontinue antimicrobial therapy on the 7th (± 1) day or to continue for a total of 14th (± 1) days. PLANNED OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is treatment failure, defined as death or relapse of infection within 28 days after randomization. Non-inferiority will be achieved if the upper edge of the two-tailed 95% confidence interval of the difference between the clinical failure rate in the 7-day and the 14-day group is not higher than 10%. CONCLUSION: The OPTIMISE trial is the first randomized controlled trial specifically designed to assess the duration of antimicrobial therapy in patients with severe infections by MDR-GNB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05210387. Registered on 27 January 2022. Seven Versus 14 Days of Antibiotic Therapy for Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacilli Infections (OPTIMISE).

Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous polymyxin B in critically ill patients: implications for selection of dosage regimens.

BACKGROUND: Polymyxin B is a last-line therapy for multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. There is a dearth of pharmacokinetic data to guide dosing in critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty-four critically ill patients were enrolled and blood/urine samples were collected over a dosing interval at steady state. Polymyxin B concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients aged 21-87 years received intravenous polymyxin B (0.45-3.38 mg/kg/day). Two patients were on continuous hemodialysis, and creatinine clearance in the other patients was 10-143 mL/min. Even with very diverse demographics, the total body clearance of polymyxin B when scaled by total body weight (population mean, 0.0276 L/hour/kg) showed remarkably low interindividual variability (32.4% coefficient of variation). Polymyxin B was predominantly nonrenally cleared with median urinary recovery of 4.04%. Polymyxin B total body clearance did not show any relationship with creatinine clearance (r(2) = 0.008), APACHE II score, or age. Median unbound fraction in plasma was 0.42. Monte Carlo simulations revealed the importance of initiating therapeutic regimens with a loading dose. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that doses of intravenous polymyxin B are best scaled by total body weight. Importantly, dosage selection of this drug should not be based on renal function.