Combination propranolol and bepridil therapy in stable angina pectoris.

The safety and efficacy of bepridil plus propranolol therapy were investigated in a placebo-controlled, parallel-design, double-blind trial in 56 patients who were not responding to propranolol alone. Patients entering the study were receiving an average propranolol dosage of 131 mg/day (range 20 to 240). For the first 2 weeks of the study they were given placebo in addition to their propranolol dose, and then were randomized to receive continued placebo plus propranolol or bepridil plus propranolol therapy. The bepridil dosage was adjusted over the 8 weeks of active treatment to an average of 273 mg/day (range 200 to 400). The double-blind treatment period was followed by a 3-week washout period during which all patients received propranolol and placebo. The effects of treatment on the frequency of angina attacks, nitroglycerin consumption, exercise performance (treadmill-modified Bruce protocol) and Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) were assessed. Propranolol and bepridil plasma levels also were obtained. Improved antianginal efficacy and reduced nitroglycerin consumption were noted when bepridil was added to propranolol (p less than 0.01). During 8 weeks of combination treatment, exercise tolerance increased 1.0 +/- 1.2 minutes from a baseline of 7.3 +/- 2.2 with bepridil plus propranolol compared with an increase of 0.02 +/- 1.3 minutes from a baseline of 7.6 +/- 2.9 with placebo plus propranolol (p less than 0.01). With bepridil plus propranolol, there were also increases in exercise time to onset of angina (p less than 0.04), exercise time to 1-mm electrocardiographic ST-segment depression (p less than 0.06) and total work (p less than 0.03) compared with placebo plus propranolol therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of once-daily cephalosporin regimens for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections in patients with chronic lung disease.

The efficacy of cefonicid and of ceftriaxone, administered once daily for the treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections (pneumonia or bronchitis), was evaluated and compared in 118 patients with chronic lung disease. The patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 gm of either drug, intravenously or intramuscularly, daily for three to 11 days (mean, seven days). Pathogenic bacteria were isolated from sputum in 59% of patients; Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae predominated. Clinical cure or improvement was noted in 95% and 93% of patients treated with cefonicid and ceftriaxone, respectively, and bacteriologic cure or improvement in 69% and 81% (the differences were not significant). Side effects were infrequent and similar in the two treatment groups, except that diarrhea was more common in the ceftriaxone group (11%, versus 4.4% in the cefonicid group). It is concluded that patients with chronic lung disease who experience acute exacerbations associated with infection caused by H influenzae or S pneumoniae, or other susceptible organisms, can be effectively treated with once-daily administration of either cefonicid or ceftriaxone.

Multicenter open trial of cefotetan and cefoxitin in elective biliary surgery.

The present study was performed in two phases. In phase I, 112 patients were randomized to either 2 g cefotetan as a single prophylactic dose or 2 g cefoxitin every 6 hours for a maximum of 4 doses; phase II included 148 patients who were randomized to either 1 g cefotetan as a single dose or cefoxitin dosed as in phase I. The randomization was 2:1 cefotetan to cefoxitin in both phases. Nonevaluability rates were 10 percent for the cefotetan patients and 22 percent for the cefoxitin patients, the majority being due to dosing errors. Demographic characteristics demonstrated 88 percent to be female, 81 percent to be less than 65 years of age, and the average weight to be 165 lb. There were no differences in these characteristics among the groups. Common duct exploration was performed in 6 percent of the 2 g cefotetan patients, 9 percent in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and 13 percent in the 2 g cefoxitin patients. There were five clinical failures of prophylaxis: one wound infection in the 2 g cefotetan patients, one wound infection and one drain tract infection in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and one wound infection and one case of cholangitis in the 2 g cefoxitin patients. The clinical success rates were 98 percent in the 2 g cefotetan patients, 98 percent in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and 97 percent in the 2 g cefoxitin patients.

Single-dose cefotetan versus multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

The safety and effectiveness of a single 2 g preoperative dose of cefotetan to reduce postoperative infectious complications after colorectal surgery was compared with multiple 2 g perioperative doses of cefoxitin in 289 patients enrolled in a multicenter trial; of the 239 evaluable patients, 164 received cefotetan and 75, cefoxitin. No statistically significant difference was detected in the successful clinical response rates for cefotetan and cefoxitin (88 percent and 92 percent, respectively). The difference in median increase in oral body temperature before and after the study (2.5 degrees F for cefotetan and 2 degrees F for cefoxitin) was statistically but not clinically significant (p = 0.03). Although nearly four times as many cefotetan patients as cefoxitin patients had surgery lasting 4 hours or more, the satisfactory bacteriologic response rates for cefotetan and cefoxitin were similar (88 percent and 93 percent, respectively). Nonobese patients and patients whose surgical procedures lasted less than 4 hours treated with either drug had significantly higher success rates (p less than 0.01). The incidence of major wound infection was approximately 8 percent for both treatment groups. Mean concentrations of cefotetan in plasma, specimens of colon, and subcutaneous fat were 128 +/- 61.8 micrograms/ml, 57.2 +/- 40.4 micrograms/g, and 26.8 +/- 19.4 micrograms/g, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions was 12 percent for each group, and no reaction was considered treatment-related, including changes in results of clinical laboratory tests. A single 2 g preoperative dose of cefotetan was as safe and effective as multiple doses of cefoxitin in the reduction of postoperative wound infections after colorectal surgery.

Long-term open evaluation of amlodipine vs hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension.

The long-term efficacy and safety of amlodipine (2.5 to 10 mg) once daily was compared with that of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (25 to 100 mg) daily in 139 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. The study was a randomized, open-label, parallel comparison of 50 weeks' duration. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio (amlodipine n = 92: HCTZ n = 47). Atenolol was added at week 12 if monotherapy was inadequate. At week 12, the mean reductions for supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure values with amlodipine were found to be -15.2/-12.3 mmHg and -14.0/-11.6 mmHg respectively, as compared to -15.5/-11.1 mmHg and -16.1/-10.1 mmHg after treatment with HCTZ. The percentage of patients responding to treatment at week 12 was 74% on amlodipine and 70% on HCTZ. The addition of atenolol in those patients not adequately controlled on monotherapy produced additional mean reductions in supine and standing systolic and diastolic pressures in both the amlodipine-atenolol group and in the HCTZ-atenolol group. The incidence of adverse effects was 47% with amlodipine and 26% with HCTZ at 12 weeks. Overall, six patients were discontinued because of side effects while receiving amlodipine monotherapy and one from the HCTZ monotherapy group; none were discontinued because of side effects on combination therapy. Laboratory test abnormalities were reported by 16% of amlodipine-treated patients compared with 63% of patients on HCTZ. The antihypertensive effects of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide appeared to be comparable and were maintained during long-term therapy.

Effects of ethaverine hydrochloride on the walking tolerance of patients with intermittent claudication.

The effect of ethaverine hydrochloride on exercise tolerance of patients with intermittent claudication was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at three sites. Forty-five patients with symptoms of occlusive arterial insufficiency of the lower extremities were randomly assigned to receive ethaverine 200 mg or placebo four times daily. The patients were evaluated biweekly for 12 weeks with treadmill claudication tests, patient and investigator assessments of symptom severity, and reports of adverse reactions. Doppler ankle/brachial pressure ratios were recorded for 26 patients. Walking tolerance improved for patients in both groups during the course of the study. Increases in distance-to-claudication were significantly greater for patients receiving ethaverine after 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks of therapy. Ankle/brachial pressure index after exercise was unchanged in both groups. Incidence of adverse reactions was similar for the two groups. Although patients were generally unaware of any improvement in symptoms, the investigators judged significant relief of claudication among those receiving ethaverine compared to those receiving placebo. It was concluded that ethaverine safely increased distance-to-claudication in patients with intermittent claudication.

Pulmonary histoplasmosis associated with exploration of a bat cave.

Approximately 14 days after exploring a limestone cave in northcentral Florida in February 1973, an 18-year-old female developed a respiratory illness with pronounced shortness of breath and cyanosis. The following day, an 18-year-old male presented to the hospital with similar complaints. The association of illness with their recent caving experience prompted further epidemiologic investigation. Twenty-nine members of a church-sponsored youth group explored the implicated cave. Twenty-three of them later became ill with complaints of cough, afternoon fever and sweats, chest discomfort, and dyspnea on exertion. Histoplasmin skin tests were positive in 18 of 24 individuals tested. Serum for complement fixation (CF) was positive in 12 of 26. Testing of area residents revealed a low incidence of skin test and CF positivity (7% and 0%, respectively). That spelunkers are at risk of acquiring pulmonary histoplasmosis has been noted previously; in Florida this has been related to the exploration of caves infested with bats. This is the largest reported outbreak of acute pulmonary histoplasmosis that has been associated with spelunking and further points out that only those individuals who enter the cave are at risk of acquiring the disease, and not those who reside in the surrounding area.

Double-blind, dose-response, placebo-controlled multicenter study of nisoldipine. A new second-generation calcium channel blocker in angina pectoris.

BACKGROUND: Nisoldipine is a potent 1:4 dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, and doses of 5 or 10 mg administered either once or twice daily have been claimed to exert antianginal effects. There is, however, little information regarding the dose-response relation and whether the drug exerts any consistent effects throughout the dosing interval. In this placebo-controlled, parallel-design study, the dose-response relation of monotherapy with nisoldipine administered twice daily was studied in patients with stable angina pectoris. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-one patients received single-blind placebo for 2 weeks; of these, 185 patients who reproducibly stopped treadmill exercise because of angina of moderate severity and had greater than or equal to 1 mm ST segment depression during exercise and experienced an average of three episodes of anginal attacks per week were randomized in a double-blind manner to one of the four treatment groups: placebo (n = 48), nisoldipine 2.5 mg (n = 47), nisoldipine 5 mg (n = 44), or nisoldipine 10 mg (n = 46). Nisoldipine or placebo was administered twice daily for 4 weeks and symptom-limited exercise tests were repeated at 2 and 10-14 hours after the double-blind medication. One hundred sixty-eight patients completed the study and 181 patients were valid for efficacy analysis. Compared with double-blind placebo, there were marginally significant trends toward increases for time to onset of angina for the 10-mg-b.i.d. group (83 versus 108 seconds, p = 0.08), time to 1 mm ST segment depression for the 5-mg-b.i.d. group (54 versus 83 seconds, p = 0.08), and total exercise time for the 5- (30 versus 50 seconds, p = 0.10) and 10-mg-b.i.d. (30 versus 58 seconds, p = 0.06) groups at 2 hours after the dose (peak effect) after 4 weeks of therapy. At 10-14 hours after the dose (trough effect), no differences between placebo and any of the nisoldipine doses on any of the exercise parameters were found after 4 weeks of therapy. A subset analysis of patients who stopped exercise within 10 minutes because of angina of moderate severity during single-blind placebo therapy (n = 123) revealed significant increase in total exercise duration and time to 1 mm ST segment depression at 2 hours after the dose in the 5- and 10-mg-b.i.d. dose groups compared with double-blind placebo (p less than 0.04). No significant trough effects, however, were observed even in this subgroup after any of the doses of nisoldipine. The frequency of anginal attacks decreased by 44%, 41%, 30%, and 41% after twice-daily therapy with 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg nisoldipine, and placebo groups, respectively (p = NS, nisoldipine versus placebo). The incidence of adverse events (minor and major) was 43.8% in the placebo group and 42.6%, 45.5%, and 56.5% in the nisoldipine 2.5-, 5-, and 10-mg-b.i.d. groups, respectively (p = NS compared with placebo). However, four patients developed unstable angina while on nisoldipine therapy (two in the 2.5-mg, one in the 5-mg, and one in the 10-mg-b.i.d. group) and two patients died suddenly in the nisoldipine 10-mg-b.i.d. group. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with 2.5, 5, and 10 mg nisoldipine twice a day was not superior to placebo therapy in treating patients with angina pectoris, and the 10-mg-b.i.d. therapy resulted in a statistically insignificant but clinically important increase in the incidence of serious adverse events.