[Acute electrophysiological modulation of the atria and pulmonary veins: effects of sympathetic and parasympathetic interaction on atrial fibrillation inducibility]. / Modulação eletrofisiológica das auriculas e veias pulmonares: interação da estimulação simpática e parassimpática na inducibilidade de fibrilhação aguda auricular num modelo experimental in vivo.

UNLABELLED: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a complex disease with multiple mechanisms, involving the interaction between the autonomic nervous system (ANS), electrophysiological properties of the atria and pulmonary veins (PVs), and vulnerability for AF. AIM: We assessed the effects of acute vagal (vagus_stim) and sympathetic stimulation (symp_stim) on atrial conduction, atrial and PV refractoriness and inducibility of AF in an in vivo rabbit model with preserved autonomic innervation. METHODS: An open-epicardial approach was used in 17 anesthetized and artificially ventilated New Zealand white rabbits. The ECG was recorded with bipolar subcutaneous electrodes placed in the four limbs. Electrograms were obtained with four monopolar electrodes placed epicardially along the atria, and a circular electrode adapted to the proximal PVs. The cervical vagus nerve and thoracic sympathetic trunk were stimulated with bipolar electrodes. Epicardial activation was recorded in sinus rhythm, and effective refractory periods (ERPs) and conduction times from the high-lateral right atrium (RA) to the high-lateral left atrium (LA) and PVs were quantified at baseline and during vagus_stim, symp_stim, or combined vagal and sympathetic stimulation (dual_stim). Burst pacing (50 Hz, 10 s), alone or combined with vagus_stim, symp_stim or dual_stim, was performed in the right (RAA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) and PVs to test for AF inducibility. RESULTS: At baseline, ERPs were higher in the LAA and there was a delay in the conduction time from RA to PV, compared to the mean activation time from RA to LA. During vagus_stim or dual_stim, ERP decreased significantly at all sites, and baseline interatrial activation times changed from 20 +/- 4 ms to 30 +/- 10 ms and 31 +/- 11 ms, respectively (p < 0.05). Symp_stim resulted in a significant decrease in ERPs only in the LAA, and a reduction of the interatrial interval to 16 +/- 11 ms (p < 0.05 vs baseline). AF inducibility ranged from 35% to 53% with baseline 50 Hz pacing, 65% to 76% during vagus_stim or symp_stim, and 75% to 100% with dual_stim (p < 0.05). AF duration increased significantly during ANS stimulation. In two-thirds of the animals with longer inducible AF, the arrhythmia ceased immediately after cessation of vagus_stim. CONCLUSIONS: In the fully innervated rabbit heart in vivo, acute ANS stimulation shortens atrial and PV refractoriness, and significantly changes atrial conduction times, promoting AF induction and prolonging the arrhythmia. This underscores the importance of acute variations in ANS tone and its interactions in the pathophysiology of AF.

Acute vagal modulation of electrophysiology of the atrial and pulmonary veins increases vulnerability to atrial fibrillation.

Vagal activity is thought to influence atrial electrophysiological properties and play a role in the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated the effects of acute vagal stimulation on atrial conduction, refractoriness of atrial and pulmonary veins (PVs) and inducibility of AF. An open-chest epicardial approach was performed in New Zealand White rabbits with preserved autonomic innervation. Atrial electrograms were obtained with four unipolar electrodes placed epicardially along the atria (n = 22) and an electrode adapted to the proximal left PV (n = 10). The cervical vagus nerve was stimulated with bipolar platinum electrodes (20 Hz). Epicardial activation was recorded in sinus rhythm, and effective refractory periods (ERPs), dispersion of refractoriness and conduction times from high-lateral right atrium (RA) to high-lateral left atrium (LA) and PVs assessed at baseline and during vagal stimulation. Burst pacing (50 Hz, 10 s), alone or combined with vagal stimulation, was applied to the right (RAA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) and PVs to induce AF. At baseline, ERPs were lower in PVs than in LA and LAA, but did not differ significantly from RA and RAA, and there was a significant delay in the conduction time from RA to PVs compared with the activation time from RA to LA (P < 0.01). During vagal stimulation, ERP decreased significantly at all sites, without significant differences in the dispersion of refractoriness, and the atrial conduction times changed from 39 ± 19 to 49 ± 9 ms (RA to PVs; n.s.) and from 14 ± 7 to 28 ± 12 ms (RA to LA; P = 0.01). Induction of AF was reproducible in 50% of cases with 50 Hz and in 82% with 50 Hz combined with vagal stimulation (P < 0.05). During vagal stimulation, AF cycle length decreased at all sites, and AF duration changed from 1.0 ± 0.9 to 14.0 ± 10.0 s (P < 0.01), with documentation of PV tachycardia in three cases. In 70% of the animals, AF ceased immediately after interruption of vagal stimulation. We conclude that in the intact rabbit heart, vagal activity prolongs interatrial conduction and shortens atrial and PV ERP, contributing to the vulnerability to the induction and maintenance of AF. This model may be useful in the assessment of the autonomic influence in the mechanisms underlying AF.

Inducibility of atrial fibrillation during electrophysiologic evaluation is associated with increased dispersion of atrial refractoriness.

UNLABELLED: The impact of atrial dispersion of refractoriness (Disp_A) in the inducibility and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been fully resolved. AIM: To study the Disp_A and the vulnerability (A_Vuln) for the induction of self-limited (<60 s) and sustained episodes of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF): 29 patients without structural heart disease and 18 with hypertensive heart disease. Atrial effective refractory period (ERP) was assessed at five sites--right atrial appendage and low lateral right atrium, high interatrial septum, proximal and distal coronary sinus. We compared three groups: group A - AF not inducible (n=13); group B - AF inducible, self-limited (n=18); group C - AF inducible, sustained (n=16). Age, lone AF, hypertension, left atrial and left ventricular (LV) dimensions, LV systolic function, duration of AF history, atrial flutter/tachycardia, previous antiarrhythmics, and Disp_A were analysed with logistic regression to determine association with A_Vuln for AF inducibility. The ERP at different sites showed no differences among the groups. Group A had a lower Disp_A compared to group B (47+/-20 ms vs 82+/-65 ms; p=0.002), and when compared to group C (47+/-20 ms vs 80+/-55 ms; p=0.008). There was no significant difference in Disp_A between groups B and C. By means of multivariate regression analysis, the only predictor of A_Vuln was Disp_A (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: In patients with PAF, increased Disp_A represents an electrophysiological marker of A_Vuln. Inducibility of both self-limited and sustained episodes of AF is associated with similar values of Disp_A. These findings suggest that the maintenance of AF is influenced by additional factors.