Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: a practical guide for the Dutch cardiologist based on real-world experience.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors include a relatively new class of glucose-lowering drugs that reduce plasma glucose concentrations by inhibiting proximal tubular reabsorption of glucose in the kidney, while increasing its excretion in urine. Recent large randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that many of these agents reduce the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalisation for heart failure, cardiovascular death and/or chronic kidney disease progression in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). Given their unique insulin-independent mode of action and favourable efficacy and adverse-event profile, SGLT2 inhibitors are promising and they offer an interesting therapeutic approach for the cardiologist to incorporate into routine practice. However, despite accumulating data supporting this class of therapy, cardiologists infrequently prescribe SGLT2 inhibitors, potentially due to a lack of familiarity with their use and the reticence to change DM medication. Here, we provide an up-to-date practical guide highlighting important elements of treatment initiation based on real-world evidence and expert opinion. We describe how to change DM medication, including insulin dosing when appropriate, and how to anticipate any adverse events based on real-world experience in patients with DM2 in the Meander Medical Centre in Amersfoort, the Netherlands. This includes a simple algorithm showing how to initiate SGLT2 inhibitor treatment safely, while considering the consequence of the glucosuric effects of these inhibitors for the individual patient.

Light therapy: is it safe for the eyes?

OBJECTIVE: Light therapy has become an increasingly popular treatment for depression and a range of other neuropsychiatric conditions. Yet, concerns have been raised about the ocular safety of light therapy. METHOD: We conducted the first systematic review into the ocular safety of light therapy. A PubMed search on January 4, 2017, identified 6708 articles, of which 161 were full-text reviewed. In total, 43 articles reporting on ocular complaints and ocular examinations were included in the analyses. RESULTS: Ocular complaints, including ocular discomfort and vision problems, were reported in about 0% to 45% of the participants of studies involving light therapy. Based on individual studies, no evident relationship between the occurrence of complaints and light therapy dose was found. There was no evidence for ocular damage due to light therapy, with the exception of one case report that documented the development of a maculopathy in a person treated with the photosensitizing antidepressant clomipramine. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that light therapy is safe for the eyes in physically healthy, unmedicated persons. The ocular safety of light therapy in persons with preexisting ocular abnormalities or increased photosensitivity warrants further study. However, theoretical considerations do not substantiate stringent ocular safety-related contraindications for light therapy.

Gastrointestinal actions of glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies: glycaemic control beyond the pancreas.

The gastrointestinal hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) lowers postprandial glucose concentrations by regulating pancreatic islet-cell function, with stimulation of glucose-dependent insulin and suppression of glucagon secretion. In addition to endocrine pancreatic effects, mounting evidence suggests that several gastrointestinal actions of GLP-1 are at least as important for glucose-lowering. GLP-1 reduces gastric emptying rate and small bowel motility, thereby delaying glucose absorption and decreasing postprandial glucose excursions. Furthermore, it has been suggested that GLP-1 directly stimulates hepatic glucose uptake, and suppresses hepatic glucose production, thereby adding to reduction of fasting and postprandial glucose levels. GLP-1 receptor agonists, which mimic the effects of GLP-1, have been developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Based on their pharmacokinetic profile, GLP-1 receptor agonists can be broadly categorized as short- or long-acting, with each having unique islet-cell and gastrointestinal effects that lower glucose levels. Short-acting agonists predominantly lower postprandial glucose excursions, by inhibiting gastric emptying and intestinal glucose uptake, with little effect on insulin secretion. By contrast, long-acting agonists mainly reduce fasting glucose levels, predominantly by increased insulin and reduced glucagon secretion, with potential additional direct inhibitory effects on hepatic glucose production. Understanding these pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences may allow personalized antihyperglycaemic therapy in type 2 diabetes. In addition, it may provide the rationale to explore treatment in patients with no or little residual ß-cell function.

Acute renal haemodynamic effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide in healthy overweight men.

AIMS: To determine the acute effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist exenatide and the involvement of nitric oxide (NO) on renal haemodynamics and tubular function, in healthy overweight men. METHODS: Renal haemodynamics and tubular electrolyte handling were measured in 10 healthy overweight men (aged 20-27 years; BMI 26-31 kg/m(2)) during intravenous administration of placebo (saline 0.9%), exenatide, and exenatide combined with the NO-synthase inhibitor L-N(G)-monomethyl arginine (L-NMMA). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were determined by inulin and para-aminohippurate clearance techniques, respectively, based on timed urine sampling. Glomerular hydrostatic pressure and vascular resistance of afferent and efferent renal arterioles were calculated using the Gomez formulae. Urinary electrolytes, osmolality and pH were also measured. RESULTS: GFR increased by a mean of 18 ± 20 (+20%; p = 0.021) and ERPF increased by a median (interquartile range) of 68 (26; 197) ml/min/1.73 m(2) (+14%; p = 0.015) during exenatide infusion versus placebo. During L-NMMA infusion, exenatide increased GFR by mean 8 ± 12 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (+9%; p = 0.049). Exenatide increased estimated glomerular pressure by +6% (p = 0.015) and reduced afferent renal vascular resistance by -33% (p = 0.038), whereas these effects were blunted during L-NMMA infusion. Exenatide increased absolute and fractional sodium excretion, urinary osmolality and urinary pH. The tubular effects of exenatide were not altered by concomitant L-NMMA infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Exenatide infusion in healthy overweight men acutely increases GFR, ERPF and glomerular pressure, probably by reducing afferent renal vascular resistance, and at least partially in an NO-dependent manner. As baseline renal haemodynamics in patients with type 2 diabetes differ from those in healthy individuals, clinical studies on the renal effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists are warranted.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide has no acute effect on MRI-measured exocrine pancreatic function in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial.

AIMS: To investigate the effect of infusion of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist exenatide on exocrine pancreatic function. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study in 12 male patients with type 2 diabetes, treated with oral glucose-lowering agents. On two separate occasions, exenatide or placebo (saline 0.9%) were administered intravenously, in randomized order. Exocrine pancreatic function was measured using secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. The primary outcome measure was defined as secretin-stimulated pancreatic excretion volume. Secondary outcome measures were maximum secretion speed and the time to reach this maximum. In addition, changes in pancreatic duct (PD) diameter were measured. RESULTS: Exenatide did not change secretin-stimulated pancreatic excretion volume, as compared with placebo (mean ± standard error of the mean 142.2 ± 15.6 ml vs 142.6 ± 8.5 ml, respectively; p = 0.590). Also, exenatide did not change the maximum secretion speed (33.1 ± 1.4 vs 36.9 ± 2.2; p = 0.221), nor the time to reach this maximum (both 4 min 30 s). No differences in PD diameter were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of exenatide did not directly influence MRI-measured exocrine pancreatic excretion in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although long-term studies are warranted, these findings suggest that potential adverse pancreatic effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists are not mediated by changes in exocrine pancreatic secretion.

Postprandial microvascular function deteriorates in parallel with gradual worsening of insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in men with the metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Hyperinsulinaemia-induced whole-body glucose uptake during a euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp is partly mediated by increased capillary density. We hypothesised that physiological insulinaemia in response to a mixed meal may also enhance microvascular function, and that this may be impaired in insulin-resistant individuals and patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Twelve men with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes, 13 with metabolic syndrome and 12 age-matched healthy normoglycaemic controls, mean age 57 ± 6 years, underwent skin capillary video microscopy before and 60 and 120 min following a standardised mixed meal to measure baseline capillary density (BCD) and capillary density during post-occlusive peak reactive hyperaemia (PRH), also termed capillary recruitment. Oral glucose insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) and postprandial hyperglycaemia (2 h AUC(glucose)) were calculated. RESULTS: Fasting BCD was similar among groups, but fasting PRH was lowest in diabetes (p < 0.05). Postprandially, both BCD and PRH increased in all groups (p < 0.001); however, the meal-related increase in BCD was significantly lower in diabetes and metabolic syndrome vs controls (both p < 0.05). At all time points, postprandial PRH was lower in both diabetes and metabolic syndrome vs controls (both p < 0.05). In pooled analysis, postprandial mean PRH correlated with Matsuda index (r = 0.386, p = 0.018) and inversely with 2 h AUC(glucose) (r = -0.336, p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Gradual deterioration in meal-related capillary recruitment was paralleled by decreasing insulin sensitivity and postprandial hyperglycaemia, as assessed in healthy normoglycaemic men, men with the metabolic syndrome and those with type 2 diabetes. These findings suggest that in both impaired glucose tolerance and in overt diabetes microvascular dysfunction might contribute to postprandial dysglycaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00721552.

Extra-pancreatic effects of incretin-based therapies: potential benefit for cardiovascular-risk management in type 2 diabetes.

Development of cardiovascular disease is one of the major complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The chronic hyperglycaemic state is often accompanied by dyslipidaemia, hypertension, low-grade systemic inflammation and oxidative stress which collectively result in a high risk of micro- and macrovascular complications. Current glucose-lowering agents do not sufficiently address fore-mentioned macrovascular-risk factors. Recently, new therapeutic agents were introduced, based on the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), that is, the GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Beside its effect on pancreatic insulin secretion, GLP-1 exerts several extra-pancreatic effects such as slowing down gastric emptying, promoting satiety and reducing food intake and weight loss. Also, GLP-1 and GLP-1RA were shown to improve cardiovascular-risk profiles, by reducing body fat content, blood pressure, circulating lipids and inflammatory markers in patients with T2DM. This review summarizes the presently known evidence with regard to extra-pancreatic effects of the incretin-based agents, focusing on the actions that improve the cardiovascular-risk profile. We present available data from clinical trials of at least 24 week duration, but also findings from small-sized clinical 'proof of principle' studies. We conclude that GLP-1 RA and to a lesser extent DPP-4 inhibitors are promising agents with regard to their effects on body weight, blood pressure and lipids, which collectively ameliorate the cardiovascular-risk profile and as such may have added value in the treatment of T2DM. However, large-sized long-term outcome studies are warranted to show the true added value of these agents in the treatment of patients with T2DM.

Glucocorticoid receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with reduced first-phase glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and disposition index in women, but not in men.

AIM: Glucocorticoids are efficacious anti-inflammatory agents, but, in susceptible individuals, these drugs may induce glucose intolerance and diabetes by affecting ß-cell function and insulin sensitivity. We assessed whether polymorphisms in the glucocorticoid receptor gene NR3C1 associate with measures of ß-cell function and insulin sensitivity derived from hyperglycaemic clamps in subjects with normal or impaired glucose tolerance. METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study was conducted in four academic medical centres in the Netherlands and Germany. Four hundred and forty-nine volunteers (188 men; 261 women) were recruited with normal glucose tolerance (n=261) and impaired glucose tolerance (n=188). From 2-h hyperglycaemic clamps, first- and second-phase glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, as well as insulin sensitivity index and disposition index, were calculated. All participants were genotyped for the functional NR3C1 polymorphisms N363S (rs6195), BclI (rs41423247), ER22/23EK (rs6189/6190), 9ß A/G (rs6198) and ThtIIII (rs10052957). Associations between these polymorphisms and ß-cell function parameters were assessed. RESULTS: In women, but not in men, the N363S polymorphism was associated with reduced disposition index (P=1.06 10(-4) ). Also only in women, the ER22/23EK polymorphism was associated with reduced first-phase glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (P=0.011) and disposition index (P=0.003). The other single-nucleotide polymorphisms were not associated with ß-cell function. Finally, none of the polymorphisms was related to insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The N363S and ER22/23EK polymorphisms of the NR3C1 gene are negatively associated with parameters of ß-cell function in women, but not in men.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and preservation of pancreatic islet-cell function: a critical appraisal of the evidence.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) develops as a consequence of progressive ß-cell dysfunction in the presence of insulin resistance. None of the currently-available T2DM therapies is able to change the course of the disease by halting the relentless decline in pancreatic islet cell function. Recently, dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors, or incretin enhancers, have been introduced in the treatment of T2DM. This class of glucose-lowering agents enhances endogenous glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) levels by blocking the incretin-degrading enzyme DPP-4. DPP-4 inhibitors may restore the deranged islet-cell balance in T2DM, by stimulating meal-related insulin secretion and by decreasing postprandial glucagon levels. Moreover, in rodent studies, DPP-4 inhibitors demonstrated beneficial effects on (functional) ß-cell mass and pancreatic insulin content. Studies in humans with T2DM have indicated improvement of islet-cell function, both in the fasted state and under postprandial conditions and these beneficial effects were sustained in studies with a duration up to 2 years. However, there is at present no evidence in humans to suggest that DPP-4 inhibitors have durable effects on ß-cell function after cessation of therapy. Long-term, large-sized trials using an active blood glucose lowering comparator followed by a sufficiently long washout period after discontinuation of the study drug are needed to assess whether DPP-4 inhibitors may durably preserve pancreatic islet-cell function in patients with T2DM.

Low-dose glucocorticoid treatment affects multiple aspects of intermediary metabolism in healthy humans: a randomised controlled trial.

AIM/HYPOTHESIS: To assess whether low-dose glucocorticoid treatment induces adverse metabolic effects, as is evident for high glucocorticoid doses. METHODS: In a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind (participants and the investigators who performed the studies and assessed the outcomes were blinded) dose-response intervention study, 32 healthy men (age 22 ± 3 years; BMI 22.4 ± 1.7 kg/m(2)) were allocated to prednisolone 7.5 mg once daily (n = 12), prednisolone 30 mg once daily (n = 12), or placebo (n = 8) for 2 weeks using block randomisation. Main outcome measures were glucose, lipid and protein metabolism, measured by stable isotopes, before and at 2 weeks of treatment, in the fasted state and during a two-step hyperinsulinaemic clamp conducted in the Clinical Research Unit of the Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands RESULTS: Prednisolone, compared with placebo, dose dependently and significantly increased fasting plasma glucose levels, whereas only prednisolone 30 mg increased fasting insulin levels (29 ± 15 pmol/l). Prednisolone 7.5 mg and prednisolone 30 mg decreased the ability of insulin to suppress endogenous glucose production (by 17 ± 6% and 46 ± 7%, respectively, vs placebo). Peripheral glucose uptake was not reduced by prednisolone 7.5 mg, but was decreased by prednisolone 30 mg by 34 ± 6% (p < 0.0001). Compared with placebo, prednisolone treatment tended to decrease lipolysis in the fasted state (p = 0.062), but both prednisolone 7.5 mg and prednisolone 30 mg decreased insulin-mediated suppression of lipolysis by 11 ± 5% and 34 ± 6%, respectively. Finally, prednisolone treatment increased whole-body proteolysis during hyperinsulinaemia, which tended to be driven by prednisolone 30 mg (5 ± 2%; p = 0.06). No side effects were reported by the study participants. All participants completed the study and were analysed. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Not only at high doses but also at low doses, glucocorticoid therapy impaired intermediary metabolism by interfering with the metabolic actions of insulin on liver and adipose tissue. These data indicate that even low-dose glucocorticoids may impair glucose tolerance when administered chronically. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN83991850.

Glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and ß-cell function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with or without low-to-medium dose glucocorticoids.

OBJECTIVES: To compare glucose tolerance and parameters of insulin sensitivity and ß-cell function between chronic glucocorticoid (GC)-using and GC-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Frequently sampled 75 g oral glucose tolerance tests were performed in 58 chronic GC-using and 82 GC-naive patients with RA with established disease, with no known type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and 50 control subjects of comparable age with normal glucose tolerance. The associations between cumulative GC dose and disease characteristics and glucose tolerance state, insulin sensitivity and ß-cell function were tested using multivariate linear and logistic regression models, correcting for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Glucose tolerance state, insulin sensitivity and ß-cell function did not differ between the two RA populations; de novo T2DM was detected in 11% and impaired glucose metabolism in 35% of patients with RA. In patients with RA, cumulative GC dose was associated with T2DM, which seemed mostly driven by the effects of cumulative GC dose on insulin resistance; however, the association decreased when corrected for current disease activity. Patients with RA had decreased insulin sensitivity and impaired ß-cell function compared with controls, and multivariate regression analyses showed a negative association between the presence of RA and insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: GC-using and GC-naive patients with RA had comparable metabolic parameters, and had decreased insulin sensitivity and ß-cell function as compared with healthy controls. Although cumulative GC dose was shown to have a negative impact on glucose tolerance state and insulin sensitivity, confounding by indication remains the main challenge in this cross-sectional analysis.

Intestinal microbiota and diabetic kidney diseases: the Role of microbiota and derived metabolites inmodulation of renal inflammation and disease progression.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) represents a growing public health burden and is the leading cause of end-stage kidney diseases. In recent years, host-gut microbiota interactions have emerged as an integral part for host homeostasis. In the context of nephropathies, mounting evidence supports a bidirectional microbiota-kidney crosstalk, which becomes particularly manifest during progressive kidney dysfunction. Indeed, in chronic kidney disease (CKD), the "healthy" microbiota structure is disrupted and intestinal microbes produce large quantities of uremic solutes responsible for renal damage; on the other hand, the uremic state, fueled by reduced renal clearance, causes shifts in microbial metabolism and composition, hence creating a vicious cycle in which dysbiosis and renal dysfunction are progressively worsened. In this review, we will summarize the evidence from clinical/experimental studies concerning the occurrence of gut dysbiosis in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD, discuss the functional consequences of dysbiosis for CKD progression and debate putative therapeutic interventions targeting the intestinal microbiome.

Effects of 12-week treatment with dapagliflozin and gliclazide on faecal microbiome: Results of a double-blind randomized trial in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are usually treated with (combinations of) glucose-lowering medication. The effects of these drugs can be influenced by intestinal microbiota and vice versa, as these drugs can also influence microbiome composition. However, as there is currently little clinical insight into this bug-drug interaction, our study aimed to evaluate the effects of 12-week treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin and sulphonylurea gliclazide on gut microbiome composition in T2D patients treated with metformin. METHODS: A total of 44 patients were randomized to either dapagliflozin or gliclazide treatment for 12 weeks. At baseline and after 12 weeks, faecal samples and 24-h urine were collected. During study visits, anthropometric data were measured and blood samples drawn after an overnight fast. Microbiome composition was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Plasma glucose, insulin, HbA1c and urinary glucose excretion were measured using conventional methods. RESULTS: While dapagliflozin and gliclazide similarly improved glycaemic control, dapagliflozin reduced and gliclazide increased fasting insulin. Dapagliflozin also greatly increased urinary glucose excretion whereas gliclazide did not, while body mass index, fat mass percentage and waist circumference were reduced by dapagliflozin, but increased by gliclazide. However, neither treatment significantly affected either gut microbiome alpha diversity or composition and, after treatment, no associations were found between microbiome composition and other clinical parameters. CONCLUSION: Even though gliclazide and dapagliflozin have different metabolic actions in patients with T2D, neither treatment altered the faecal microbiome, thereby suggesting that the observed metabolic changes are not mediated by their effects on the microbiota.

Novel insights into glucocorticoid-mediated diabetogenic effects: towards expansion of therapeutic options?

At pharmacological concentrations, glucocorticoids (GCs) display potent anti-inflammatory effects, and are therefore frequently prescribed by physicians to treat a wide variety of diseases. Despite excellent efficacy, GC therapy is hampered by their notorious metabolic side effect profile. Chronic exposure to increased levels of circulating GCs is associated with central adiposity, dyslipidaemia, skeletal muscle wasting, insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and overt diabetes. Remarkably, many of these side-effects of GC treatment resemble the various components of the metabolic syndrome (MetS), in which indeed subtle disturbances in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and/or increased tissue sensitivity to GCs have been reported. Recent developments have led to renewed interest in the mechanisms of GC's diabetogenic effects. First, 'selective dissociating glucocorticoid receptor (GR) ligands', which aim to segregate GC's anti-inflammatory and metabolic actions, are currently being developed. Second, at present, selective 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11beta-HSD1) inhibitors, which may reduce local GC concentrations by inhibiting cortisone to cortisol conversion, are evaluated in clinical trials as a novel treatment modality for the MetS. In this review, we provide an update of the current knowledge on the mechanisms that underlie GC-induced dysmetabolic effects. In particular, recent progress in research into the role of GCs in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction will be discussed.

Exenatide twice-daily does not affect renal function or albuminuria compared to titrated insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A post-hoc analysis of a 52-week randomised trial.

AIMS: To compare the effects of long-term treatment with the GLP-1RA exenatide twice-daily versus titrated insulin glargine (iGlar) on renal function and albuminuria in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. METHODS: We post-hoc evaluated renal outcome-data of 54 overweight T2DM patients (mean  ±â€¯SD age 60 ±â€¯8 years, HbA1c 7.5 ±â€¯0.9%, eGFR 86 ±â€¯16 mL/min/1.73 m2, median [IQR] urinary albumin-to-creatinine-ratio (UACR) 0.75 [0.44-1.29] mg/mmol) randomised to exenatide 10 µg twice-daily or titrated iGlar on-top-of metformin for 52-weeks. Renal efficacy endpoints were change in creatinine clearance (CrCl) and albuminuria (urinary albumin-excretion [UAE] and UACR) based on 24-h urines, collected at baseline and Week-52. eGFR and exploratory endpoints were collected throughout the intervention-period, and after a 4-week wash-out. RESULTS: HbA1c-reductions were similar with exenatide (mean ±â€¯SEM -0.80 ±â€¯0.10%) and iGlar (-0.79 ±â€¯0.14%; treatment-difference 0.02%; 95% CI -0.31 to 0.42%). Change from baseline to Week-52 in CrCl, UAE or UACR did not statistically differ; only iGlar reduced albuminuria (P < 0.05; within-group). eGFR decreased from baseline to Week-4 with exenatide (-3.9 ±â€¯2.1 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.069) and iGlar (-2.7 ±â€¯1.2 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.034), without treatment-differences in ensuing trajectory. Exenatide versus iGlar reduced bodyweight (-5.4 kg; 2.9-7.9; P < 0.001), but did not affect blood pressure, lipids or plasma uric acid. CONCLUSIONS: Among T2DM patients without overt nephropathy, one-year treatment with exenatide twice-daily does not affect renal function-decline or onset/progression of albuminuria compared to titrated iGlar. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00097500.

Influence of prednisolone on parameters of de novo lipogenesis and indices for stearoyl-CoA- and Δ6- desaturase activity in healthy males: A Post-hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

Glucocorticoid treatment decreases liver insulin sensitivity and may modify fatty acid metabolism. We investigated the influence of oral prednisolone on indices for de novo lipogenesis (DNLi), stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCDi) and Δ6-desaturase (D6Di) activity in healthy males. In addition, we explored whether the changes may be associated with prednisolone-induced changes in glucose and lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Thirty-two healthy young males (mean ±â€¯SD age 22 ±â€¯3 years, BMI 22.4 ±â€¯1.7 kg/m2) were allocated to receive prednisolone 7.5 mg/day (PRED7.5; n = 12), prednisolone 30 mg/day (PRED30; n = 12), or placebo (n = 8) in a randomized double-blind fashion for 2 weeks. Fatty acid compositions of plasma cholesteryl esters (CE), phospholipids (PL) and triglycerides (TG) were measured at baseline and on day 14. DNLi, SCDi and D6Di were estimated from product/precursor ratios in CE, with DNLi primary deriving from 16:1ω7/18:2ω6, SCDi from 16:1ω7/16:0 and D6Di from 22:6ω3/20:5ω3. Ratios were also assessed in PL and TG. In CE, PRED30 increased DNLi by 51.2 [95%CI 14.8; 87.6]%, increased SCDi by 48.6 [18.7; 78.5]%, and decreased D6Di by 57.7 [-91.8; -23.5]% (p ≤ 0.01 for all, compared to placebo). The prednisolone-induced increases in DNLi and SCDi were positively correlated with insulin sensitivity (r = 0.35 and 0.50, respectively). Similar results were found in PL and TG. Prednisolone dose-dependently increases DNLi and SCDi and decreases D6Di in plasma CE, PL and TG in healthy males after 2 weeks. The observed unfavorable effects on fatty acid metabolism were related to the induction of glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance.

Steroid diabetes: from mechanism to treatment?

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are frequently prescribed anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs. In addition to their beneficial effects on disease activity, GCs have an extensive side effect profile, including adverse effects on metabolism resulting in the development of glucose intolerance and overt diabetes. Recent developments have led to renewed interest in the mechanisms underlying these diabetogenic effects of GCs. First, dissociated glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonists were developed which are designed to segregate the anti-inflammatory and metabolic actions of GCs, potentially rendering compounds with a higher therapeutic index. Second, at present, 11-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type-1 inhibitors are under development. These compounds may lower tissue GC concentrations by inhibiting cortisone to cortisol conversion and are being evaluated in clinical trials as a novel treatment modality for the metabolic syndrome. Here, we provide an up-to-date overview of the current insights regarding the mechanisms responsible for the adverse metabolic effects of GCs that may lead to steroid diabetes. Particularly, we will focus on GC-related induction of insulin resistance and pancreatic islet-cell dysfunction. Finally, we will discuss how increased knowledge concerning the pathophysiology of steroid diabetes may result in improved treatment strategies.

Unexpected diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in a patient presenting with an infected ICD lead.

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a rare disease in Western countries. Infection with Leishmania parasites usually remains asymptomatic, but may cause significant disease in children and immunocompromised adults in endemic areas. Here, we report a case of sporadic VL caused by Leishmania infantum in an immunocompetent patient who had visited Southern France one year ago and presented with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead infection.

No difference in glycosphingolipid metabolism and mitochondrial function in glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance in healthy men.

OBJECTIVE: Glucocorticoids (GCs) are well known to induce insulin resistance; however, mechanisms that cause the impairement of the insulin signaling pathway have not yet been identified. In this study we measured whether GC-induced insulin resistance in humans is related to changes in muscle ceramide, GM3, and muscle mitochondrial function. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-response intervention study, 32 healthy males (aged 22 ± 3 years; body mass index 22.4 ± 1.7 kg/m(-2)) were allocated to prednisolone (PRED) 7.5 mg once daily (n = 12), PRED 30 mg once daily (n = 12), or placebo (n = 8) for 2 weeks using block randomization. Insulin sensitivity was measured by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp before and after treatment. Muscle biopsies were performed to measure ceramide, monosialodihexosylganglioside (GM3), and mitochondrial function. RESULTS: Peripheral insulin sensitivity was dose dependently decreased after the PRED treatment. Muscle ceramide and GM3 concentration and mitochondrial function were not altered by 2 weeks of PRED treatment. CONCLUSION: Short-term GC treatment dose dependently impaired whole-body insulin sensitivity in healthy males, without concomitant changes in muscle ceramide, GM3, or mitochondrial function. These findings suggest that other mechanisms play a role in GC-related impairment of insulin sensitivity.