Acceptability and Effectiveness of a One-Hour Healthcare Provider Intervention Integrating HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Cultural Competence Training.

Enhanced provider training could improve PrEP access and equity. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing (a) a one-hour, group-based provider intervention integrating PrEP and Cultural Competence (PCC) training with (b) a standard HIV continuing medical education session (n = 56). PCC participants favorably rated the intervention and reported increased PrEP knowledge. The PCC intervention increased their confidence performing PrEP-related clinical activities and intention to prescribe PrEP. The percentage of participants discussing PrEP with patients increased marginally in both study conditions. The percentage of participants who prescribed PrEP and self-rated cultural competence did not change in either study condition.

RESUMEN: Una mejor capacitación de los proveedores podría mejorar el acceso y la equidad de la PrEP. Realizamos un ensayo controlado aleatorizado piloto que comparó (a) una intervención grupal de proveedores de una hora que integraba la capacitación en PrEP y competencia cultural (PCC) con (b) una sesión estándar de educación médica continua sobre el VIH (n = 56). Los participantes de PCC calificaron favorablemente la intervención e informaron un mayor conocimiento de la PrEP. La intervención de PCC aumentó su confianza en la realización de actividades clínicas relacionadas con la PrEP y su intención de prescribir la PrEP. El porcentaje de participantes que discutieron la PrEP con los pacientes aumentó marginalmente en ambas condiciones del estudio. El porcentaje de participantes que prescribieron la PrEP y la competencia cultural autoevaluada no cambió en ninguna de las condiciones del estudio.

Consensus Statement No. 434: Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive and current overview of the evidence for the value of simulation for education, team training, patient safety, and quality improvement in obstetrics and gynaecology, to familiarize readers with principles to consider in developing a simulation program, and to provide tools and references for simulation advocates. TARGET POPULATION: Providers working to improve health care for Canadian women and their families; patients and their families. OUTCOMES: Simulation has been validated in the literature as contributing to positive outcomes in achieving learning objectives, maintaining individual and team competence, and enhancing patient safety. Simulation is a well-developed modality with established principles to maximize its utility and create a safe environment for simulation participants. Simulation is most effective when it involves interprofessional collaboration, institutional support, and regular repetition. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This modality improves teamwork skills, patient outcomes, and health care spending. Upholding prescribed principles of psychological safety when implementing a simulation program minimizes harm to participants. However, simulation can be an expensive tool requiring human resources, equipment, and time. EVIDENCE: Articles published between 2003 and 2022 were retrieved through searches of Medline and PubMed using the keywords "simulation" and "simulator." The search was limited to articles published in English and French. The articles were reviewed for their quality, relevance, and value by the SOGC Simulation Working Group. Expert opinion from relevant seminal books was also considered. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: All health care professionals working to improve Canadian women's health, and relevant stakeholders, including granting agencies, physician/nursing/midwifery colleges, accreditation bodies, academic centres, hospitals, and training programs.

Validity and reliability of the Persian version of modified motivated strategies for learning questionnaire: a methodological study among medical students.

BACKGROUND: Medical undergraduates need to improve their techniques for learning in the different settings of learning in clinical rotations. Reflective learning, in which a person can learn from their experiences, is among the most well-known learning skills. In this study, we aim to translate the newly developed modified form of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) to Persian and evaluate its reliability and validity among medical students. METHODS: This study was performed on medical students in clinical stages at the Shiraz University of Medical Science in 2022. The modified MSLQ questionnaire was used in this study which is a 32-item tool measuring different aspects of self-reflecting, including self-orientation, feedback-seeking, critical thinking, and self-regulation. This questionnaire was translated into Persian properly. Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis were used to ascertain the reliability and validity of the tool. RESULTS: A total of 325 medical students consisting of 174 men and 151 women with an average age of 23.79 (± 2.21) were enrolled. Path diagrams of confirmatory factor analysis for both standardized regression coefficients and t-values and all the fitness indicators were in favor of the proper validation of the translated version. The overall Cronbach's alpha for the questionnaire was 0.9, and the value for each of four subscales was above 0.7. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the Persian-translated version of the modified MSLQ is valid and reliable without taking too much time and effort to implement. We recommend that the developed tool be distributed to medical students from other Iran universities.

Lessons from the implementation of the Health Care Homes program.

Australia's primary health care system works well for most Australians, but 20% of people live with multimorbidity, often receiving fragmented care in a complex system. Australia's 10-year plan for primary health care recognises that person-centred care is essential to securing universal health coverage, improving health outcomes and achieving an integrated sustainable health system. The Health Care Homes trial tested a new model of person-centred care for people with chronic and complex health conditions. This model demonstrated that change can be achieved with dedicated transformational support and highlighted the importance of enablers and reform streams that are now established in the 10-year plan.

[Learning with digital media in emergency medicine-a path through the jungle of possibilities]. / Lernen mit digitalen Medien in der Notfallmedizin ­ ein Pfad durch den Dschungel der Möglichkeiten.

Background: Digital media, such as podcasts, wikis, ePortfolios, and extended reality applications, provide excellent learning opportunities with a high degree of connectivity and flexibility for learners, as well as for learning facilitators. This not only enables location-independent and pandemic-resilient learning, but also a high degree of autonomy for the learners. The megatrend of digitalization opens up many possibilities, but there are also stumbling blocks and limitations. Objectives: This article is intended to provide readers in the emergency medicine/rescue field with an overview, various aspects to consider, and awareness of stumbling blocks. However, a balancing act between didactics and medicine as well as the heterogeneous group of addressees is necessary. Methods: By means of a narrative review, an assessment of digital media is made and subjected to an evaluation from the perspective of educational practice. Conclusion: Learning is not only changing due to new learning technologies, but also due to the growing importance of informal learning, the increasing significance of the ability to quickly access high-quality knowledge, faster-changing professional biographies, and the use of digital universal tools. Thus, in the jungle of possibilities, an estimation of scientific quality criteria is often difficult and a differentiated consideration is necessary. Basically, the question of appropriate methods must be asked and it must be critically questioned whether the learning/competency objectives can be achieved with the planned digitalized media. Digital media cannot and should not replace practical training in the workplace.

Barriers to identifying and obtaining CME: a national survey of physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

BACKGROUND: CPD educators and CME providers would benefit from further insight regarding barriers and supports in obtaining CME, including sources of information about CME. To address this gap, we sought to explore challenges that clinicians encounter as they seek CME, and time and monetary support allotted for CME. METHODS: In August 2018, we surveyed licensed US clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants), sampling 100 respondents each of family medicine physicians, internal medicine and hospitalist physicians, medicine specialist physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants (1895 invited, 500 [26.3%] responded). The Internet-based questionnaire addressed barriers to obtaining CME, sources of CME information, and time and monetary support for CME. RESULTS: The most often-selected barriers were expense (338/500 [68%]) and travel time (N = 286 [57%]). The source of information about CME activities most commonly selected was online search (N = 348 [70%]). Direct email, professional associations, direct mail, and journals were also each selected by > 50% of respondents. Most respondents reported receiving 1-6 days (N = 301 [60%]) and $1000-$5000 (n = 263 [53%]) per year to use in CME activities. Most (> 70%) also reported no change in time or monetary support over the past 24 months. We found few significant differences in responses across clinician type or age group. In open-ended responses, respondents suggested eight ways to enhance CME: optimize location, reduce cost, publicize effectively, offer more courses and content, allow flexibility, ensure accessibility, make content clinically relevant, and encourage application. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians report that expense and travel time are the biggest barriers to CME. Time and money support is limited, and not increasing. Online search and email are the most frequently-used sources of information about CME. Those who organize and market CME should explore options that reduce barriers of time and money, and creatively use online tools to publicize new offerings.

Educating junior doctors and pharmacists to reduce discharge prescribing of opioids for surgical patients: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether educating junior doctors and hospital pharmacists about analgesic prescribing improved discharge prescribing of opioids for opioid-naïve patients after surgical admissions. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial, undertaken during the first half of 2019. SETTING: The Alfred Hospital, a major Melbourne teaching hospital with 13 surgical units. PARTICIPANTS: Opioid-naïve patients discharged from surgical units after a stay of at least 24 hours. INTERVENTION: Surgical units were randomised to the intervention or control arms. Interns, residents, and clinical pharmacists assigned to intervention arm units attended education sessions, presented by the hospital analgesic stewardship pharmacist, about appropriate analgesic prescribing for patients in hospital surgical units. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The patients prescribed slow release opioids on discharge from hospital during the baseline (1 February - 30 April 2018) and post-intervention periods (17 February - 30 April 2019). RESULTS: During the baseline period, 1369 intervention unit and 1014 control unit admissions were included in our analysis; during the evaluation period, 973 intervention unit and 706 control unit episodes were included. After adjusting for age, length of stay, pain score, acute pain service involvement, and use of immediate release opioids prior to admission, patients in the intervention group were prescribed slow release opioids at discharge less frequently than patients in the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35-0.77) and were more frequently discharged without any prescribed opioids following the intervention (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.24-2.30). Providing de-escalation plans was more frequent for intervention than control group patients prescribed slow release opioids on discharge post-intervention (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.25-4.45). CONCLUSIONS: Specific education for clinicians and pharmacists about appropriate analgesic prescribing for surgical patients is effective in reducing prescribing of opioids at discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618000876291 (prospective).

Keys to success of a community of clinical practice in primary care: a qualitative evaluation of the ECOPIH project.

BACKGROUND: The current reality of primary care (PC) makes it essential to have telemedicine systems available to facilitate communication between care levels. Communities of practice have great potential in terms of care and education, and that is why the Online Communication Tool between Primary and Hospital Care was created. This tool enables PC and non-GP specialist care (SC) professionals to raise clinical cases for consultation and to share information. The objective of this article is to explore healthcare professionals' views on communities of clinical practice (CoCPs) and the changes that need to be made in an uncontrolled real-life setting after more than two years of use. METHODS: A descriptive-interpretative qualitative study was conducted on a total of 29 healthcare professionals who were users and non-users of a CoCP using 2 focus groups, 3 triangular groups and 5 individual interviews. There were 18 women, 21 physicians and 8 nurses. Of the interviewees, 21 were PC professionals, 24 were users of a CoCP and 7 held managerial positions. RESULTS: For a system of communication between PC and SC to become a tool that is habitually used and very useful, the interviewees considered that it would have to be able to find quick, effective solutions to the queries raised, based on up-to-date information that is directly applicable to daily clinical practice. Contact should be virtual - and probably collaborative - via a platform integrated into their habitual workstations and led by PC professionals. Organisational changes should be implemented to enable users to have more time in their working day to spend on the tool, and professionals should have a proactive attitude in order to make the most if its potential. It is also important to make certain technological changes, basically aimed at improving the tool's accessibility, by integrating it into habitual clinical workstations. CONCLUSIONS: The collaborative tool that provides reliable, up-to-date information that is highly transferrable to clinical practice is valued for its effectiveness, efficiency and educational capacity. In order to make the most of its potential in terms of care and education, organisational changes and techniques are required to foster greater use.

[Use of mobile applications by interns at Ibn-Rochd University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco]. / Utilisation des applications mobiles par les internes du Centre hospitalier universitaire Ibn-Rochd Casablanca, Maroc.

Introduction: Mobile applications are now increasingly used by trainee and practising physicians due to the wide range of applications available in the field of healthcare and their ease of use. The objective of this study was to estimate the frequency and describe the use of these applications by interns at Ibn-Rochd University Hospital in Casablanca. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in December 2014 on a sample of Ibn-Rochd interns. Participants from multiple disciplines and medical specialties completed an anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Results: One hundred and thirteen interns participated in the study with a 94.2% response rate: 95% of these interns had a smartphone and 85.2% had at least one healthcare mobile applications with an average of 3.57 applications per interns (SD = 3.14). Interns used these applications at least once a day and the most frequently downloaded applications were those devoted to diagnosis and patient care (61%). No statistically significant correlation was observed between the number of applications and the intern's specialty, the type of operating system used or the intern's gender. Conclusion: The use of healthcare mobile applications and the support they provide to Ibn-Rochd interns allowed an assessment of the importance of these new tools in medical training and practice. However, supervision and support by seniors are essential in view of the risks involved.

Improving team information sharing with a structured call-out in anaesthetic emergencies: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Sharing information with the team is critical in developing a shared mental model in an emergency, and fundamental to effective teamwork. We developed a structured call-out tool, encapsulated in the acronym 'SNAPPI': Stop; Notify; Assessment; Plan; Priorities; Invite ideas. We explored whether a video-based intervention could improve structured call-outs during simulated crises and if this would improve information sharing and medical management. METHODS: In a simulation-based randomized, blinded study, we evaluated the effect of the video-intervention teaching SNAPPI on scores for SNAPPI, information sharing, and medical management using baseline and follow-up crisis simulations. We assessed information sharing using a probe technique where nurses and technicians received unique, clinically relevant information probes before the simulation. Shared knowledge of probes was measured in a written, post-simulation test. We also scored sharing of diagnostic options with the team and medical management. RESULTS: Anaesthetists' scores for SNAPPI were significantly improved, as was the number of diagnostic options they shared. We found a non-significant trend to improve information-probe sharing and medical management in the intervention group, and across all simulations, a significant correlation between SNAPPI and information-probe sharing. Of note, only 27% of the clinically relevant information about the patient provided to the nurse and technician in the pre-simulation information probes was subsequently learnt by the anaesthetist. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a structured communication tool, SNAPPI, to improve information sharing between anaesthetists and their team, taught it using a video-based intervention, and provide initial evidence to support its value for improving communication in a crisis.

Effectiveness of the palliative care 'Availability, Current issues and Anticipation' (ACA) communication training programme for general practitioners on patient outcomes: a controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although communicating effectively with patients receiving palliative care can be difficult, it may contribute to maintaining or enhancing patients' quality of life. Little is known about the effect of training general practitioners in palliative care-specific communication. We hypothesized that palliative care patients of general practitioners exposed to the 'Availability, Current issues and Anticipation' communication training programme would report better outcomes than patients of control general practitioners. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Availability, Current issues and Anticipation training programme for general practitioners on patient-reported outcomes. DESIGN: In a controlled trial, general practitioners followed the Availability, Current issues and Anticipation programme or were part of the control group. Patients receiving palliative care of participating general practitioners completed the Palliative Care Outcome Scale, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative, the Rest & Peace Scale, the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-III and the Availability, Current issues and Anticipation Scale, at baseline and 12 months follow-up. We analysed differences between groups using linear mixed models. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN56722368. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: General practitioners who attended a 2-year Palliative Care Training Course in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Questionnaire data were available for 145 patients (89 in intervention and 56 in control group). We found no significant differences over time between the intervention and control groups in any of the five outcome measures. Ceiling effects were observed for the Rest & Peace Scale, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-III and Availability, Current issues and Anticipation Scale. CONCLUSION: General practitioner participation in the Availability, Current issues and Anticipation training programme did not have a measurable effect on any of the outcomes investigated. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with general practitioner care, regardless of group assignment. Future research might focus on general practitioners without special interest in palliative care.