Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A-Final efficacy and safety results from the NuProtect study.

INTRODUCTION: Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) is a 4th generation recombinant FVIII with proven efficacy for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes (BEs) in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A. The NuProtect study assessed the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of simoctocog alfa in 108 previously untreated patients (PUPs). The incidence of high-titre inhibitors was 16.2% and no patients with non-null F8 mutations developed inhibitors. AIM: To report the efficacy and safety results from the NuProtect study. METHODS: PUPs received simoctocog alfa for prophylaxis, treatment of BEs, or as surgical prophylaxis. The efficacy of prophylaxis (during inhibitor-free periods) was assessed using annualised bleeding rates (ABRs). The efficacy in treating BEs and in surgical prophylaxis was assessed using a 4-point scale. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: Of 108 PUPs treated with simoctocog alfa, 103 received at least one prophylactic dose and 50 received continuous prophylaxis for at least 24 weeks. In patients on continuous prophylaxis, the median ABR was 0 (mean 0.5) for spontaneous BEs and 2.5 (mean 3.6) for all BEs. In 85 patients who had BEs, efficacy of BE treatment was excellent or good for 92.9% (747/804) of rated BEs; 92.3% of BEs were treated with 1 or 2 infusions. The efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was excellent or good for 94.7% (18/19) of rated procedures. There were no safety concerns and no thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION: Simoctocog alfa was efficacious and well tolerated as prophylaxis, surgical prophylaxis and for the treatment of BEs in PUPs with severe haemophilia A.

In Utero Cell Treatment of Hemophilia A Mice via Human Amniotic Fluid Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Engraftment.

Hemophilia is a genetic disorder linked to the sex chromosomes, resulting in impaired blood clotting due to insufficient intrinsic coagulation factors. There are approximately one million individuals worldwide with hemophilia, with hemophilia A being the most prevalent form. The current treatment for hemophilia A involves the administration of clotting factor VIII (FVIII) through regular and costly injections, which only provide temporary relief and pose inconveniences to patients. In utero transplantation (IUT) is an innovative method for addressing genetic disorders, taking advantage of the underdeveloped immune system of the fetus. This allows mesenchymal stromal cells to play a role in fetal development and potentially correct genetic abnormalities. The objective of this study was to assess the potential recovery of coagulation disorders in FVIII knockout hemophilia A mice through the administration of human amniotic fluid mesenchymal stromal cells (hAFMSCs) via IUT at the D14.5 fetal stage. The findings revealed that the transplanted human cells exhibited fusion with the recipient liver, with a ratio of approximately one human cell per 10,000 mouse cells and produced human FVIII protein in the livers of IUT-treated mice. Hemophilia A pups born to IUT recipients demonstrated substantial improvement in their coagulation issues from birth throughout the growth period of up to 12 weeks of age. Moreover, FVIII activity reached its peak at 6 weeks of age, while the levels of FVIII inhibitors remained relatively low during the 12-week testing period in mice with hemophilia. In conclusion, the results indicated that prenatal intrahepatic therapy using hAFMSCs has the potential to improve clotting issues in FVIII knockout mice, suggesting it as a potential clinical treatment for individuals with hemophilia A.

BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism and the risk of the development of inhibitors in children with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia A (HA) is an x-linked recessive disease due to deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against infused FVIII is a major concern. B cell activating factor (BAFF) has been implicated in several autoimmune diseases. AIM: We aimed to evaluate the possible association of BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism and the risk of the development of FVIII inhibitor in children with severe HA. METHODS: This cohort study was carried out on 100 newly diagnosed boys with severe HA who were never treated before with FVIII concentrate. Assessment of serum levels of BAFF and BAFF rs9514828 genotyping at first diagnosis was performed and the patients were followed up for the completion of a total of 50 exposure days or the development of inhibitors whichever occurred first. The patients were divided as positive or negative according to the presence or absence of inhibitors. RESULTS: The risk allele for BAFF rs9514828 (T) was significantly more frequent in the inhibitor positive patients than the inhibitor negative patients (P = .003). In addition, CT+TT genotypes were associated with increased risk of FVIII inhibitor development. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed that BAFF levels could predict the development of FVIII inhibitors at a cut-off value of ≥ .92 with a sensitivity of 85.9% and a specificity of 80.2%. CONCLUSION: BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism could be independent risk factor and elevated BAFF levels might be useful prognostic marker for the development of FVIII inhibitor in newly diagnosed children with severe HA.

Plasma-derived FVIII/VWF complex shows higher protection against inhibitors than isolated FVIII after infusion in haemophilic patients: A translational study.

INTRODUCTION: Presence of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in FVIII concentrates offers protection against neutralizing inhibitors in haemophilia A (HA). Whether this protection is more evident in plasma-derived (pd) FVIII/VWF or recombinant (r) FVIII concentrates remains controversial. AIM: We investigated the protection exerted by VWF against FVIII inhibitors in an in vivo mouse model of HA exposed to pdFVIII/VWF or to various rFVIII concentrates. METHODS: Haemophilia A mice received the different FVIII concentrates after administration of vehicle or an inhibitory IgG purified from a commercial pool of HA plasma with inhibitors and FVIII:C recoveries were measured. Furthermore, using a novel clinically oriented ex vivo approach, Bethesda inhibitory activities (BU) of a commercial pool of HA plasma with inhibitors were assessed using normal plasma, or plasma from severe HA patients, without inhibitors, after treatment with the same concentrates. RESULTS: in vivo studies showed that pdFVIII/VWF offers markedly higher protection against inhibitors when compared with any of the FVIII products without VWF. More importantly, in the ex vivo studies, plasma from patients treated with pdFVIII/VWF showed higher protection against inhibitors (P values ranging .05-.001) in comparison with that observed in plasma from patients who received FVIII products without VWF, regardless of the type of product evaluated. CONCLUSION: Data indicate that FVIII+VWF complexes assembled in the circulation after rFVIII infusion are not equivalent to the naturally formed complex in pdFVIII/VWF. Therefore, rFVIII infused into HA patients with inhibitors would be less protected by VWF than the FVIII in pdFVIII/VWF concentrates.

Concomitant use of bypassing agents with emicizumab for people with haemophilia A and inhibitors undergoing surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery in people with haemophilia and factor VIII inhibitors is typically managed with perioperative administration of haemostatic agents to prevent or control the occurrence of bleeding events. Practical experience of surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving treatment with emicizumab is growing; however, the novelty of the situation means that standardised guidelines are lacking with regard to the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents, including dose and laboratory monitoring. AIM: To review approaches to haemostatic management during major and minor invasive procedures in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, and to provide recommendations for controlling bleeding events. METHODS: A search was conducted, limited to the past 4 years (January 2016-April 2020), pertaining to published evidence of surgery for patients receiving emicizumab. Publications identified from the search were manually reviewed to determine studies and case reports relevant for inclusion. RESULTS: Identified literature and practical experience of the authors were used to build a consensus of practical recommendations for the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents during the perioperative period for elective surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence base indicates that surgery can be successfully performed in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab and that bypassing agents can be used concomitantly. Data from prospective studies are required to further support recommendations for haemostatic management of surgery in patients receiving emicizumab.

Inhibitors-Recent insights.

The development of inhibitory antibodies to therapeutic factor VIII (FVIII) in haemophilia A (HA) patients is the major complication in treatment/prevention of haemorrhages. The reasons some HA patients develop inhibitors while others do not remain unclear. This review briefly summarizes our understanding of anti-FVIII immune responses, the roles of T cells, both effector and regulatory, and generally discusses the interplay between FVIII and the immune system, both in factor replacement therapy and gene therapy, with some comparisons to factor IX and haemophilia B therapies. Notably, we propose that the prevailing observed active tolerance to FVIII in both HA and non-HA individuals rests to greater or lesser extents on peripherally induced immune tolerance. We also propose that the immune systems of inhibitor-negative HA patients do not merely ignore therapeutic FVIII, but rather have immunologically assessed and actively tolerized the patients to exogenous FVIII. Induction of such peripheral immune tolerance may further be triggered in HA patients who failed to tolerize upon initial FVIII exposure by 'appropriate' stimulation of their immune system, eg by immune tolerance induction therapy via intensive FVIII therapy, by oral administration of FVIII, by cellular therapies or by gene therapy directed to immuno-tolerogenic sites such as the liver.

Short term efficacy of recombinant porcine factor VIII in patients with factor VIII inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies against factor VIII (FVIII), seen in acquired (AHA) and congenital haemophilia A, lead to severe bleeding diatheses. Current first-line treatment includes bypass agents. Recombinant porcine sequence FVIII (rpFVIII) was developed as an alternative therapy. AIM: To describe our institutional experience with the use of rpFVIII. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of five patients treated with rpVIII between 2016 and 2019. RESULTS: Five patients (four AHA, one congenital haemophilia with inhibitors) were treated with rpFVIII. No patient had an adverse event during infusion. All patients initially exhibited a response evidenced by increased FVIII levels from baseline <1% to 81%-170%, normalization of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and resolution of bleeding. However, all five patients were subsequently noted to have decreasing peak FVIII levels and aPTT prolongation, either within the initial treatment course or upon later re-administration. Resistance to rpFVIII was recognized after an average of 12.4 exposure days. Porcine FVIII inhibitor levels measured afterwards were present (detectable-170 Bethesda units) in all patients. Three out of four AHA subjects also developed an increase in the anti-human FVIII inhibitor titres after receiving rpFVIII. CONCLUSION: rpFVIII was safe and initially effective in all patients. However, its use is associated with development of an inhibitor to rpFVIII, decreasing its efficacy and duration of effect. Further, rpFVIII use may lead to an increase in patient anti-human FVIII inhibitor titres. A larger study is necessary to appropriately assess the incidence of these outcomes.

Treatment regimens and outcomes in severe and moderate haemophilia A in the UK: The THUNDER study.

INTRODUCTION: The THUNDER study provides an analysis of treatment patterns and outcomes in UK patients with severe or moderate haemophilia A (SHA/MHA) in 2015. METHODS: Patients with SHA or MHA registered with the UK National Haemophilia Database (NHD) were segregated by severity, inhibitor status and age. Haemophilia joint health score (HJHS) was derived from NHD records and treatment regimen and annualized bleed/joint-bleed rate (ABR/AJBR) from Haemtrack (HT) in HT-compliant patients. RESULTS: We report 1810 patients with SHA and 864 with MHA. Prophylaxis was used in 94.9% (n = 130/137) of HT-compliant children <12 years with SHA, falling to 74.1% (n = 123/166) aged ≥40 years. Median ABR increased with age (1.0, IQR 0.0-5.0, <12 years; 3.0 IQR, 1.0-8.0, ≥40 years). Inhibitors were present in 159 (8.8%) SHA and 34 (3.9%) MHA. Median ABR increased from 2.0 (<12 years) to 21.0 (≥40 years) in SHA inhibitor patients using prophylaxis. Prophylaxis was used by 68.8% of HT-compliant MHA patients (n = 106) (median FVIII baseline 0.01 IU/mL) associated with a median (IQR) ABR of 3.0 (1.0-7.0). Median HJHS (n = 453) increased with age in SHA and MHA. Median (IQR) HJHS was higher in SHA inhibitor (17.0, 0.0-64.5) than non- or past inhibitor patients (7.0, 0.0-23.0). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing ABR with age persists despite current prophylaxis regimens. SHA and MHA had similar ABR/AJBR and HJHS, leading to a suspicion that a subgroup of MHA may be relatively undertreated. More intensive prophylaxis may improve outcomes, but this requires further study.

F8 inversions of introns 22 and 1 confer a moderate risk of inhibitors in Mexican patients with severe hemophilia A. Concordance analysis and literature review.

Intron-22 (Inv22) and intron-1 (Inv1) inversions account for approximately one half of all severe cases of hemophilia A (SHA) worldwide. Inhibitor development against exogenous factor VIII (FVIII) represents a major complication in HA. The causative F8 mutation is considered the most decisive factor conditioning inhibitor development. We aimed to investigate prevalence of Inv22 and Inv1 mutations, and its association as risk factors for developing inhibitors to FVIII. We investigated Inv22 and Inv1 in 255 SHA Mexican patients from 193 unrelated families using the inverse shifting-polymerase chain reaction (IS-PCR). We analyzed the association between inversions and inhibitor development via logistic regression introducing as covariates the populations, the inversions, F8-haplotypes and the age of patients at enrollment. Inv22 was found in 91/193 (47.2%: 38.9% exhibited Inv22-1 and 8.3% Inv22-2), and Inv1 in 2/193 (1.0%) independent families. Absolute inhibitor prevalence (IP) for Inv22 in unrelated patients was 15% (10-19). The cohorts and age of patients were independent predictors of inhibitor risk, but not inversions or haplotypes. Inversions presence in our population was associated to a moderate risk of developing inhibitors. Inv1 was found for the first time in two Mexican families. A relevant genetic component was observed by the strong concordance among brother-pairs.

Oxidation of factor VIII increases its immunogenicity in mice with severe hemophilia A.

The development of antibodies against therapeutic factor VIII (FVIII) represents the major complication of replacement therapy in patients with severe hemophilia A. Amongst the environmental risk factors that influence the anti-FVIII immune response, the presence of active bleeding or hemarthrosis has been evoked. Endothelium damage is typically associated with the release of oxidative compounds. Here, we addressed whether oxidation contributes to FVIII immunogenicity. The control with N-acetyl cysteine of the oxidative status in FVIII-deficient mice, a model of severe hemophilia A, reduced the immune response to exogenous FVIII. Ex vivo exposure of therapeutic FVIII to HOCl induced a mild oxidation of the molecule as evidenced by the loss of free amines and resulted in increased FVIII immunogenicity in vivo when compared to native FVIII. The increased immunogenicity of oxidized FVIII was not reverted by treatment of mice with N-acetyl cysteine, and did not implicate an increased maturation of professional antigen-presenting cells. Our data document that oxidation influences the immunogenicity of therapeutic FVIII.

Immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® (human-cl rhFVIII) in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A-Interim results from the NuProtect Study.

INTRODUCTION: Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) is a fourth generation recombinant FVIII, produced in a human cell line, without chemical modification or protein fusion. No inhibitors developed in studies with Nuwiq® in 201 previously treated patients with haemophilia A (HA). The immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe HA are being assessed in the ongoing NuProtect study. METHODS: The study, conducted across 38 centres worldwide, is evaluating 110 true PUPs of all ages and ethnicities enrolled for study up to 100 exposure days (EDs) or 5 years maximum. The primary objective is to assess the immunogenicity of Nuwiq® (inhibitor activity ≥0.6 BU) using the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay at a central laboratory. RESULTS: Data for 66 PUPs with ≥20 EDs from a preplanned interim analysis were analysed. High-titre (HT) inhibitors developed in 8 of 66 patients after a median of 11.5 EDs (range 6-24). Five patients developed low-titre inhibitors (4 transient). The cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval) was 12.8% (4.5%, 21.2%) for HT inhibitors and 20.8% (10.7%, 31.0%) for all inhibitors. During inhibitor-free periods, median annualized bleeding rates during prophylaxis were 0 for spontaneous bleeds and 2.40 for all bleeds. Efficacy was rated as "excellent" or "good" in treating 91.8% of bleeds. Efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was "excellent" or "good" for 8 (89%) procedures and "moderate" for 1 (11%). No tolerability concerns were evident. CONCLUSION: These interim data show a cumulative incidence of 12.8% for HT inhibitors and convincing efficacy and tolerability in PUPs treated with Nuwiq® .

The Development of FVIII Inhibitors in Relation to IL10 Gene Polymorphism in Hemophilia A Egyptian Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: Development of inhibitors against Factor VIII (FVIII) in hemophilia A patients is a serious complication of therapy. Many cytokines, including interleukin-10 (IL10), may affect inhibitor development; however, literature data are not sufficient to prove this association. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between FVIII inhibitor formation and IL10-1082A/G polymorphism among Egyptian hemophiliacs. METHODS: Patients were screened for FVIII inhibitors using the Bethesda method. IL10-1082A/G polymorphism was detected by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: Six patients (12%) developed inhibitors. No statistically significant difference was found between inhibitor positive and negative patients regarding IL10-1082A/G genotypes, disease severity, or treatment-related variables (type of FVIII received, treatment regimen, age at first exposure to FVIII, and frequency of replacement therapy). CONCLUSIONS: FVIII inhibitor formation in this group of Egyptian hemophiliacs was not correlated to IL10-1082A/G polymorphism, disease severity, or any of the treatment variables.

The role of previously untreated patient studies in understanding the development of FVIII inhibitors.

Development of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII), the major complication of haemophilia A treatment today, is influenced by multiple factors. Genetic (F8 mutation, family history, ethnicity, polymorphisms in immune modulating genes) and non-genetic (intensive exposure to FVIII, presence of pro-inflammatory signals as might occur with large bleeds, infections, surgery, or other immune stimulants [e.g. vaccines]) risk factors as well as their complex inter-relationships contribute to the inhibitor risk profile of haemophilia patients, particularly in the previously untreated patient (PUP) population. Studies in PUPs have been fundamental to furthering the understanding of FVIII inhibitor development, as well as discovering previously unappreciated risk factors. The multi-factorial nature of inhibitor development makes it difficult to ascertain the contribution of FVIII products in inhibitor development through individual PUP studies. Sufficiently powered studies of large cohorts may overcome these limitations but interpretations should be conducted cautiously. Proper design and implementation of PUP safety studies will become even more important with the introduction of new molecules, such as extended half-life or human cell-line derived FVIII that propose reduced immunogenicity. Despite these difficulties, carefully performed clinical studies in PUPs may provide important insights into the natural history of the immune response to FVIII and may suggest targets for intervention to reduce immunogenicity.

Porcine recombinant factor VIII (Obizur; OBI-1; BAX801): product characteristics and preclinical profile.

INTRODUCTION: Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare, often severe, auto-immune bleeding disorder caused by the development of inhibitory antibodies (inhibitors) to factor VIII (FVIII). Bypassing agents, recombinant activated FVII or activated prothrombin complex concentrate, are currently recommended as first-line treatments to control bleeding events in patients with AHA. AIM: A plasma-derived porcine FVIII (Hyate:C, Ipsen, UK) was used as a first-line treatment for AHA but was discontinued in 2004 due to viral safety concerns. A recombinant pFVIII (rpFVIII), Obizur (OBI-1; BAX801), which is expected to have a similar efficacy profile to Hyate:C but with a superior safety profile was developed and recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of AHA. METHODS: Obizur manufacturing begins with the expression of B domain deleted rpFVIII by genetically modified baby hamster kidney-derived cells. The final purified and lyophilized drug product has a negligible risk of viral contamination and contains no animal-derived plasma proteins. Obizur was evaluated for immunogenicity, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and bleeding times in preclinical models including in haemophiliac dogs, cynomolgus monkeys and FVIII-knockout mice. RESULTS: Preclinical animal studies show that the efficacy and immunogenicity of Obizur are similar to that of Hyate:C and that Obizur has a more favourable safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Obizur is a highly purified recombinant porcine FVIII drug product that has been demonstrated to have a favourable safety and efficacy profile when compared with Hyate:C and can be a valuable treatment option for control of bleeding in AHA patients.

Analysis of F8 inversions as risk factors for FVIII inhibitor development in Indian severe haemophilia A patients.

FVIII inhibitor development in haemophilia A (HA) patients, especially those with severe manifestations is a serious adverse effect in patients with haemophilia A, and the clinical management of these patients is very difficult as most don't respond to conventional treatment. Many genetic and non-genetic risk factors have been proposed however, these are diverse in different population groups, highlighting the importance of determining specific risk factors for each population. F8 mutations and especially inversions, which are the most common causative mutation in severe HA, have been significantly associated with inhibitor development earlier, however there is no conclusive data so far with regard to Indian haemophiliacs. This study provides novel evidence that intron 22 inversions in the F8 gene are indeed significantly associated with FVIII inhibitor development in Indian haemophiliacs. Further studies with other risk factors would enable better insights into the immune response towards FVIII in these patients, and possibly help to characterize patients at a higher risk for inhibitor development.

Native plasma-derived FVIII/VWF complex has lower sensitivity to FVIII inhibitors than the combination of isolated FVIII and VWF proteins. Impact on Bethesda assay titration of FVIII inhibitors.

Sensitivity to FVIII inhibitors of the native plasma-derived (pd) FVIII/VWF complex vs. the complexes formed after exogenous FVIII infusion in the haemophilic patient has not been thoroughly studied. The role of VWF in the interaction of FVIII with inhibitors was studied in vitro using different combinations of VWF and FVIII concentrates. Normal plasma, pdFVIII/VWF and isolated FVIII (recombinant FVIII, B-domain deleted and pdFVIII) were used. Titre (BU) was kinetically determined (up to 2 h) in serial dilutions of inhibitor IgG (purified from a pool of plasmas with inhibitors) mixed with VWF and then incubated with the different FVIII. Inhibitor was also added to previously mixed VWF+FVIII. Residual FVIII:C was determined. TGA assays were performed with FVIII-deficient plasma spiked with the FVIII-VWF mixtures with/without an ESH-8 antibody. Inhibitor titres for plasma and pdFVIII/VWF were comparable at all time points. Titres for all concentrates of isolated FVIII were significantly higher than those for plasma or pdFVIII/VWF (1.4-1.9 fold) even after preincubation with VWF. At t = 0 h, titres for plasma or pdFVIII/VWF were unquantifiable, but were detectable for isolated FVIII (0.6-1.6 BU). In contrast to pdFVIII/VWF, the decrease in thrombin generation parameters by isolated FVIII in the presence of ESH-8 was significant (P < 0.01) even when previously combined with VWF. In conclusion, VWF protection against FVIII inhibitor activity might be higher with native pdFVIII/VWF complex than with the corresponding compound formed from the isolated proteins. Bethesda assay titration using different FVIII concentrates would be advisable to guide the treatment of inhibitor patients.

Development of a rapid and fully automated factor VIII inhibitor assay, insensitive to emicizumab, and a lowest level of quantification of 0.2 BU/mL.

BACKGROUND: Factor (F)VIII inhibitors are measured using labor- and resource-expensive Nijmegen or Bethesda assays, which lack sensitivity for low-titer inhibitors and show high variations in quality surveys, mainly because of manual assay procedures. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was the development of a fast and fully automated FVIII inhibitor assay by using recombinant (r)FVIII as substrate and dedicated equipment for execution of the test. METHODS: A new rapid, fully automated, FVIII inhibitor assay is presented, the core of which is use of full-length recombinant FVIII (rFVIII; Kovaltry, Bayer) as inhibitor substrate instead of plasma FVIII, resulting in rapid binding of inhibitors to rFVIII due to absence of von Willebrand factor. Dramatic shortening of incubation time facilitated full automation on an analyzer capable of 3 subsequent sample dilution steps and 3 reagent additions. Equal volume mixtures of sample and rFVIII (1.0 U/mL) were incubated for 10 minutes at 37 °C, whereafter remaining FVIII activity was analyzed with a kinetic chromogenic assay, allowing inhibitor activity calculation without preceding FVIII activity calibration, using a Ceveron s100 analyzer (Technoclone). RESULTS: Mean titer in 60 nonhemophiliacs was 0.0 BU/mL (SD, 0.1), yielding a limit of blank of 0.1 BU/mL and lower limit of quantification of 0.2 BU/mL. Analyses were performed with the new method and a Nijmegen assay in 28 inhibitor-positive clinical samples, 14 containing emicizumab and 14 without. Correlation coefficient in emicizumab-free type I inhibitor samples was 1.0. Emicizumab dependency of the method was excluded in spiking experiments with inhibitor-positive samples. Reproducibility was tested by analyzing 7 samples in 3 laboratories for 5 days, twice daily; coefficients of variation of all samples were <15%. CONCLUSION: We present development data of a sensitive and specific rapid, automated FVIII inhibitor assay generating results within 20 minutes that is less resource-intensive than standard assays with potential to improve assay variability.

Impact of HLA alleles and cytokine polymorphisms on inhibitors development in children with severe haemophilia A.

Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) alleles, cytokine polymorphisms and the type of factor VIII (FVIII) gene mutation are among predisposing factors for inhibitors (inh) development in children with severe haemophilia A (HA). The aim was to investigate the correlations among (i) FVIII gene intron-22 inversion, (ii) HLA alleles and haplotypes and (iii) certain cytokine polymorphisms, with the risk for FVIII inhibitors development in 52 Greek severe HA children, exclusively treated with recombinant concentrates. We performed Long-Range PCR for detection of intron-22 inversion and PCR-SSP, PCR-SSO for genotyping of HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1 alleles and also for cytokine polymorphisms of TNF-α, TGF-ß1, IL-10, IL-6 and IFN-γ. Chi-squared test and Fischer's exact test were used for statistical analysis. A total of 28 children had developed inhibitors (Group I), 71.4% high responding, while 24 had not (Group II). No statistically increased intron-22 inversion prevalence was found in Group I compared with Group II (P = 0.5). Comparison of HLA allele frequencies between the two groups showed statistically significant differences in the following genotypes (i) promoting inhibitors development: DRB1*01(P = 0.014), DRB1*01:01(P = 0.011) and DQB1*05:01 (P = 0.005) and (ii) possibly protecting from inhibitors development: DRB1*11 (P = 0.011), DRB1*11:01 (P = 0.031), DQB1*03 (P = 0.004) and DQB1*03:01 (P = 0.014). Analysis of cytokines revealed a higher incidence of inhibitor detection only in homozygotes of the haplotypes ACC and ATA for IL-10 polymorphisms (P = 0.05). There is evidence that HLA alleles and cytokine polymorphisms play an important role in FVIII inh development. On the contrary, no statistically significant results were obtained for intron-22 inversion and its impact on FVIII inhibitors formation.

Acquired Factor VIII Inhibitors: Three Cases.

UNLABELLED: Acquired hemophilia A is a rare, but devastating bleeding disorder caused by spontaneous development of autoantibodies directed against coagulation factor VIII. In 40%-50% of patients it is associated with such conditions as the postpartum period, malignancy, use of medications, and autoimmune diseases; however, its cause is unknown in most cases. Acquired hemophilia A should be suspected in patients that present with a coagulation abnormality, and a negative personal and family history of bleeding. Herein we report 3 patients with acquired hemophilia A that had different underlying pathologies, clinical presentations, and therapeutic responses. Factor VIII inhibitor formation in case 1 occurred 6 months after giving birth; underlying disorders were not identified in cases 2 or 3. The bleeding phenotype in these patients' ranged from no bleeding tendency with isolated prolongation of APTT (activated partial thromboplastin time) to severe intramuscular hematoma and hemarthrosis necessitating recombinant activated factor VII infusion and blood components transfusion. Variable responses to immunosuppressive treatment were also observed. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None declared.

Safe and Successful Surgical Outcome in Persons with Hemophilia A with and without Inhibitors Treated with Emicizumab: A Large, Single Center, Real-World Experience.

Emicizumab is a humanized recombinant bispecific antibody, bridging together activated factor IX (FIXa) and factor X (FX), thus mimicking the activity of FVIII in vivo. Emicizumab is designed for long-term prophylaxis in patients with severe hemophilia A with and without inhibitors. This approach provides constant protection, with significant reduction in bleeding rate and improved quality of life. However, protection provided by emicizumab is not absolute, and clotting factor concentrates (FVIII, rFVIIa, aPCC) may be necessary for post-traumatic bleeding or surgery, with a potential thrombotic risk or difficulty in preventing bleeding. Real world evidence is still scanty, especially for managing major surgery. In this study, 75 surgeries were managed in 28 patients (27 major procedures in 15 patients and 48 minor procedures in 20 patients. In 17 patients without inhibitors, 30 minor surgeries were carried out by using FVIII in 5, with only a bleeding event, which was successfully treated with FVIII concentrate. Six major surgeries were uneventfully performed with FVIII concentrate. Eleven PWHA and high-titer inhibitors underwent 39 surgical procedures (18 minor and 21 major surgeries). Minor surgeries were mostly performed without prophylaxis with rFVIIa, with only a single bleeding complication. All 21 major surgeries were covered with a homogeneous protocol using rFVIIa. In four instances, bleeding complications occurred, treated with rFVIIa. Of them, a single patient only failed to respond and died because of an uncontrollable bleeding from a large ruptured retroperitoneal pseudotumor. Surgery in patients with emicizumab can be safely carried out with the use of appropriate replacement therapy protocols.