Impact of the empirical therapy timing on the clinical progress of septic shock patients.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of timing of antimicrobial therapy on clinical progress of patients with septic shock. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We included 204 adult patients diagnosed with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria between March 2016 and April 2021. One-month survival was evaluated using univariate and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Antibiotic treatment was initiated within 1 h of the vasopressors in 26.4 % of patients. One-month mortality did not differ significantly between patients with and without empirical therapy coverage on etiological agents. Univariate factors that significantly affected one-month survival were starting antibiotics at the first hour, the unit where the case was diagnosed with septic shock, SOFA scores, qSOFA scores, and lactate level. In multivariate analysis, diagnosis of septic shock in the Emergency Service, SOFA score ≥11, qSOFA score of three and lactate level ≥4 were significantly associated with one-month mortality. CONCLUSION: Training programs should be designed to increase the awareness of septic shock diagnosis and treatment in the Emergency Service and other hospital units. Additionally, electronic patient files should have warning systems for earlier diagnosis and consultation.

Beta Blockers Improve Prognosis When Used Early in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: An Analysis of the FRENSHOCK Multicenter Prospective Registry.

BACKGROUND: Beta blockers (BBs) are a cornerstone for patients with heart failure (HF) and ventricular dysfunction. However, their use in patients recovering from a cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a bone of contention, especially regarding whether and when to reintroduce this class of drugs. METHODS: FRENSHOCK is a prospective multicenter registry including 772 CS patients from 49 centers. Our aim was to compare outcomes (1-month and 1-year all-cause mortality) between CS patients taking and those not taking BBs in three scenarios: (1) at 24 h after CS; (2) patients who did or did not discontinue BBs within 24 h; and (3) patients who did or did not undergo the early introduction of BBs. RESULTS: Among the 693 CS included, at 24 h after the CS event, 95 patients (13.7%) were taking BB, while 598 (86.3%) were not. Between the groups, there were no differences in terms of major comorbidities or initial CS triggers. Patients receiving BBs at 24 h presented a trend toward reduced all-cause mortality both at 1 month (aHR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.1, p = 0.10) and 1 year, which was, in both cases, not significant. Compared with patients who discontinued BBs at 24 h, patients who did not discontinue BBs showed lower 1-month mortality (aHR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.92, p = 0.03) and a trend to lower 1-year mortality. No reduction in outcomes was observed in patients who underwent an early introduction of BB therapy. CONCLUSIONS: BBs are drugs of first choice in patients with HF and should also be considered early in patients with CS. In contrast, the discontinuation of BB therapy resulted in increased 1-month all-cause mortality and a trend toward increased 1-year all-cause mortality.

Comorbidity burden and outcomes of older adults with acute promyelocytic leukemia: a National Cancer Database analysis of 2221 patients.

Association between comorbidity burden and patient outcomes has not been adequately investigated in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). We utilized the National Cancer Database to evaluate the association of the Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (CCI) with one-month mortality and overall survival (OS) in adults ≥60 years with APL. One-month mortality was 16%, 24%, and 32%, and 3-year OS was 61%, 53%, and 38% for patients with CCI 0, 1, and ≥2, respectively. One-month mortality was higher for patients with CCI 1 (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.29-2.16, p < .001) and CCI ≥ 2 (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.70-3.13, p < .001) compared to patients with CCI 0. Patients with CCI 1 (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.46, p < .001) and CCI ≥ 2 (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.48-2.06, p < .001) had worse OS compared to patients with CCI 0. In conclusion, CCI is an independent predictor of survival outcomes in patients with APL.

Early mortality and overall survival in acute promyelocytic leukemia: do real-world data match results of the clinical trials?

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) boasts overall survival (OS) of >90% at 3 years and early mortality of <5% in recent clinical trials. Using a large National Cancer Database, we performed analysis of 7190 adults with APL to determine whether one-month mortality and OS of patients with APL treated in real-world practices mirror outcomes noted in clinical trials. Only 64% of total patients received multi-agent therapy; 32% received either single-agent therapy or no therapy at all. One-month mortality was 6% for patients ≤18 years, 6% for 19-40 years, 10% for 41-60 years, and 21% for >60 years. OS at 1- and 3-year were 81% and 75%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, age ≤ 40 years, treatment at academic center, use of multi-agent therapy, and diagnosis after 2009 conferred better OS. In this largest database study in APL till date, we demonstrated an overall improvement in OS over time but challenges still exist in translating successes of clinical trials to real-world practices.