Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 191
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Autoimmun ; 144: 103175, 2024 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38387105

RESUMEN

SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells recognize conserved viral peptides and in the absence of cross-reactive antibodies form an important line of protection against emerging viral variants as they ameliorate disease severity. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce robust spike-specific antibody and T cell responses in healthy individuals, but their effectiveness in patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) is less well defined. These patients are often treated with systemic immunosuppressants, which may negatively affect vaccine-induced immunity. Indeed, TNF inhibitor (TNFi)-treated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients display reduced ability to maintain SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses post-vaccination, yet the effects on CD8+ T cells remain unclear. Here, we analyzed the impact of IBD and TNFi treatment on mRNA-1273 vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell responses compared to healthy controls in SARS-CoV-2 experienced and inexperienced patients. CD8+ T cells were analyzed for their ability to recognize 32 SARS-CoV-2-specific epitopes, restricted by 10 common HLA class I allotypes using heterotetramer combinatorial coding. This strategy allowed in-depth ex vivo profiling of the vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell responses using phenotypic and activation markers. mRNA vaccination of TNFi-treated and untreated IBD patients induced robust spike-specific CD8+ T cell responses with a predominant central memory and activated phenotype, comparable to those in healthy controls. Prominent non-spike-specific CD8+ T cell responses were observed in SARS-CoV-2 experienced donors prior to vaccination. Non-spike-specific CD8+ T cells persisted and spike-specific CD8+ T cells notably expanded after vaccination in these patient cohorts. Our data demonstrate that regardless of TNFi treatment or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, IBD patients benefit from vaccination by inducing a robust spike-specific CD8+ T cell response.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Vacunación , Anticuerpos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Antivirales
2.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 63(3): 751-764, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37314967

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In bio-naïve patients with PsA initiating a TNF inhibitor (TNFi), we aimed to identify baseline predictors of Disease Activity index for PsA in 28 joints (DAPSA28) remission (primary objective) and DAPSA28 moderate response at 6 months, as well as drug retention at 12 months across 13 European registries. METHODS: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were retrieved and the three outcomes investigated per registry and in pooled data, using logistic regression analyses on multiply imputed data. In the pooled cohort, selected predictors that were either consistently positive or negative across all three outcomes were defined as common predictors. RESULTS: In the pooled cohort (n = 13 369), 6-month proportions of remission, moderate response and 12-month drug retention were 25%, 34% and 63% in patients with available data (n = 6954, n = 5275 and n = 13 369, respectively). Five common baseline predictors of remission, moderate response and 12-month drug retention were identified across all three outcomes. The odds ratios (95% CIs) for DAPSA28 remission were: age, per year: 0.97 (0.96-0.98); disease duration, years (<2 years as reference): 2-3 years: 1.20 (0.89-1.60), 4-9 years: 1.42 (1.09-1.84), ≥10 years: 1.66 (1.26-2.20); men vs women: 1.85 (1.54-2.23); CRP of >10 vs ≤10 mg/l: 1.52 (1.22-1.89) and 1 mm increase in patient fatigue score: 0.99 (0.98-0.99). CONCLUSION: Baseline predictors of remission, response and adherence to TNFi therapy were identified, of which five were common for all three outcomes, indicating that the predictors emerging from our pooled cohort may be considered generalizable from country level to disease level.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Fatiga , Inmunoterapia , Sistema de Registros
3.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 63(1): 140-148, 2024 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37140539

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: CLIPPER2 was an 8-year, open-label extension of the phase 3b, 2-year CLIPPER study on the safety and efficacy of etanercept in patients with JIA, categorized as extended oligoarticular arthritis (eoJIA), enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) or PsA. METHODS: Participants with eoJIA (2-17 years old), ERA or PsA (each 12-17 years old) who received ≥1 etanercept dose (0.8 mg/kg weekly; maximum 50 mg) in CLIPPER could enter CLIPPER2. Primary end point was occurrence of malignancy. Efficacy assessments included proportions achieving JIA ACR 30/50/70/90/100 criteria and ACR inactive disease criteria, and clinical remission (ACR criteria) or Juvenile Arthritis DAS (JADAS) ≤1. RESULTS: Overall, 109/127 (86%) CLIPPER participants entered CLIPPER2 [n = 55 eoJIA, n = 31 ERA, n = 23 PsA; 99 (78%) on active treatment]; 84 (66%) completed 120 months' follow-up [32 (25%) on active treatment]. One malignancy (Hodgkin's disease in 18-year-old patient with eoJIA treated with methotrexate for 8 years) was reported; there were no cases of active tuberculosis or deaths. Numbers and incidence rates (events per 100 patient-years) of TEAEs (excluding infections/ISRs) decreased from 193 (173.81) in Year 1 to 9 (27.15) in Year 10; TE infections and serious infections also decreased. Over 45% of participants (n = 127) achieved JIA ACR50 responses from Month 2 onwards; 42 (33%) and 34 (27%) participants achieved JADAS and ACR clinical remission, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept treatment up to 10 years was well tolerated, consistent with the known safety profile, with durable response in the participants still on active treatment. The benefit-risk assessment of etanercept in these JIA categories remains favourable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov IDs: CLIPPER (NCT00962741); CLIPPER2 (NCT01421069).


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Juvenil , Artritis Psoriásica , Neoplasias , Niño , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Preescolar , Adolescente , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38460549

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine characteristics associated with patient-reported treatment success in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Rheumatologist-diagnosed PsA patients fulfilling the CASPAR classification were recruited from a single center. PsA outcome measures included: 66/68 swollen/tender joint counts, Leeds/SPARCC dactylitis/enthesitis indices, psoriasis body surface area (BSA), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including PROMIS. The primary outcome was a patient-reported item: "Today, considering the level of control of your psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis, do you consider your treatment has been successful?" Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified clinical predictors of patient-reported treatment success. Patient-reported reasons for lack of treatment success were explored. RESULTS: A total of 178 participants had a baseline visit. Mean (SD) CASPAR score was 3.7 (0.9), age 51.7 (13.5) years, and BMI 31.3 (7.2) kg/m2. Fifty-two percent were women, and 86.0% white. Treatment success was reported by 116/178(65%) patients in the analytic cohort. Among 76 patients who reported treatment failure, the most frequently selected reasons for lack of success were pain (n = 55, 72.4%), fatigue (n = 46, 60.5%), inflamed joints (n = 40, 52.6%), and stiffness (n = 40, 52.6%). Overall, 105 participants had complete data across variables in the logistic regression models. Patient-reported treatment success was independently associated with the 66-swollen/68-tender joint counts, psoriasis BSA, PROs (pain interference, physical function, fatigue), and TNF-inhibitor therapy, after controlling for BMI and demographics. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported treatment success in PsA may be achieved through improvement of inflammatory arthritis, psoriasis, pain, physical function, fatigue, and the use ofTNF-inhibitors. Patients reported treatment failure was most commonly due to symptoms of pain, fatigue and stiffness.

5.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 28(3): 269-275, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549359

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the published efficacy and adverse event rates associated with existing biologics for the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP). DATA SOURCES: A literature review using the PubMed database (January 1990-July 2023) was conducted. Multiple search combinations were conducted using "pityriasis rubra pilaris" and various biologics as keywords to identify relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Inclusion criteria included all study types that were published within the past 30 years in English and mentioned at least one biologic and PRP. A preliminary search yielded a total of 499 results. After screening using inclusion and exclusion criteria, 77 relevant articles (69 case reports, 5 case series, 2 clinical trials, and 1 retrospective analysis) were analyzed. DATA SYNTHESIS: TNF-α inhibitors have been evaluated and are effective in treating PRP. However, recent treatment with anti-interleukin (IL)-17 and anti-IL-23 therapies such as ustekinumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab are emerging as new treatment options with a mean improvement in PRP Area and Severity Index scores, change in severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness of PRP lesions. From initial clinical trials, secukinumab and ixekizumab are promising treatment options for achieving remission. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review compares the efficacy for numerous biologics and a discussion to guide clinicians on benefits and risks in choosing a biologic for PRP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Biologics may be a favourable treatment option leading to greater patient adherence due to reduced dosing frequencies, improvement in quality of life, and reduction in frequency and severity of flares.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Pitiriasis Rubra Pilaris , Pitiriasis Rubra Pilaris/tratamiento farmacológico , Pitiriasis Rubra Pilaris/patología , Humanos , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico
6.
Gastroenterology ; 162(7): 1876-1890, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35122766

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dose-optimization strategies for biologic therapies in Crohn's disease (CD) are not well established. The SERENE CD (Study of a Novel Approach to Induction and Maintenance Dosing With Adalimumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease) trial evaluated higher vs standard adalimumab induction dosing and clinically adjusted (CA) vs therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) maintenance strategies in patients with moderately to severely active CD. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, eligible adults (Crohn's Disease Activity Index score of 220-450, endoscopic evidence of mucosal inflammation, and previous failure of standard therapies) were randomized to higher induction regimen (adalimumab 160 mg at weeks 0, 1, 2, and 3; n = 308) or standard induction regimen (adalimumab 160 mg at week 0 and 80 mg at week 2; n = 206) followed by 40 mg every other week from week 4 onward. Co-primary end points included clinical remission at week 4 and endoscopic response at week 12. At week 12, patients were re-randomized to maintenance therapy optimized by Crohn's Disease Activity Index and C-reactive protein (CA; n = 92) or serum adalimumab concentrations and/or clinical criteria (TDM; n = 92); exploratory end points were evaluated at week 56. RESULTS: Similar proportions of patients receiving higher induction regimen and standard induction regimen achieved clinical remission at week 4 (44% in both; P = .939) and endoscopic response at week 12 (43% vs 39%, respectively, P = .462). Week 56 efficacy was similar between CA and TDM. Safety profiles were comparable between dosing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Higher induction regimen was not superior to standard induction regimen, and CA and TDM maintenance strategies were similarly efficacious. Adalimumab therapy was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02065570).


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Enfermedad de Crohn , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/efectos adversos , Adulto , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/metabolismo , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Inducción de Remisión , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(2): 969-976, 2023 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35471231

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To find indicators of disease severity and factors of early remission in patients with deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (DADA2). METHODS: We enrolled six DADA2 patients from six families. Direct sequencing of adenosine deaminase 2 gene (ADA2) was performed by Sanger analysis. A literature review was conducted for articles regarding paediatric DADA2. RESULTS: We found that more organs were involved in early-onset (≤1 year of age) than in late-onset (>1 year of age) DADA2 patients had high level inflammatory responses, such as elevated ESR, SF, serum amyloid A and CRP. Disease severity was not significantly different from missense and frameshift mutation. Early administration of TNF inhibitor might result in better remission and reduce recurrence. In the literature, four articles describing 51 paediatric DADA2 patients were identified. We also found that fever, stroke, peripheral nervous system involvement, hypogammaglobulinaemia and hypertension were more frequent in early onset DADA2 patients. CONCLUSION: Early-onset DADA2 may be more severe. Early administration of TNF inhibitor can effectively reduce recurrence and quickly alleviate the disease.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Desaminasa , Agammaglobulinemia , Humanos , Niño , Preescolar , Adenosina Desaminasa/genética , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intercelular/genética , Agammaglobulinemia/genética , Mutación
8.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(7): 2352-2359, 2023 07 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36440887

RESUMEN

Dealing with patients with both multiple sclerosis (MS) and inflammatory rheumatic disorders (IRDs) is not uncommon for a rheumatologist, as there is a statistical association between SpA and MS. As several CNS demyelinating events have been reported in patients treated with TNF inhibitor (TNFi), the pre-existing demyelinating disease was considered a contraindication for TNFi. However, this contraindication is mainly based on a randomized controlled trial in MS and not on large epidemiological studies. According to the last epidemiological studies, TNFi might not be an inducer of MS. Moreover, there are no clear recommendations on the use of the other DMARDs in patients suffering from an IRD and MS. In this review, we summarize the link between MS and IRDs and the impact of DMARDs on MS, especially TNFi. We also look at the impact of disease-modifying drugs for adults with MS and IRDs.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Esclerosis Múltiple , Fiebre Reumática , Adulto , Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Fiebre Reumática/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
9.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(6): 2139-2146, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36205588

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of pharmacological treatment of SpA on depressive symptoms and explore whether this effect differs between drug classes. METHODS: Data from the observational Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index Validation Study were used. Patients were assessed at baseline and after initiation of NSAIDs/conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs)/TNF inhibitors (TNFis). Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression subscale [HADS-D; 0-21 (best-worst)]. Covariables included demographics and disease characteristics, including disease activity [Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)/BASDAI]. The change in HADS-D from baseline was compared between treatments (NSAIDs/csDMARDs/TNFis) with analysis of variance and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 304 patients were included; 102/45/157 initiated NSAIDs/csDMARDs/TNFis and 260 (85%) / 44 (15%) had axial/peripheral SpA. At baseline, the mean HADS-D was 6.9 (s.d. 4.2); 126 (42%) were possibly depressed (HADS-D ≥8) and 66 (22%) were probably depressed (HADS-D ≥11). At follow-up, depressive symptoms significantly improved in all treatment groups. In multivariable regression without disease activity measures, initiating TNFis compared with NSAIDs was associated with greater improvement in depressive symptoms [ß = -1.27 (95% CI -2.23, -0.32)] and lower odds of possible depression at follow-up [odds ratio 0.47 (95% CI 0.23, 0.94)]. This association was attenuated after additional adjustment for disease activity (ASDAS/BASDAI) but not CRP. csDMARDs did not differ from NSAIDs regarding their effect on HADS-D. Between-drug class results were confirmed in axial SpA (axSpA), although less clear in peripheral SpA. CONCLUSION: Treatment of active SpA also improves depressive symptoms. Especially in axSpA, TNFis have a greater effect than NSAIDs, which is mainly explained by a stronger effect on disease activity. We found no evidence for a direct link between CRP-mediated inflammation and depressive symptoms in SpA.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Espondiloartritis , Espondilitis Anquilosante , Humanos , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/etiología , Espondiloartritis/complicaciones , Espondiloartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Espondiloartritis/diagnóstico , Espondilitis Anquilosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
10.
Dermatology ; 239(2): 287-298, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36476409

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Interstitial granulomatous dermatitis (IGD) and palisaded neutrophilic granulomatous dermatitis (PNGD) are uncommon presentations of reactive granulomatous dermatitis. Histologic lesions characterized by IGD/PNGD patterns have been associated with systemic diseases, causing an unmet need for revealing clinical correlates. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to unravel the systemic diseases beyond dermatitis of IGD/PNGD. METHODS: This study analyzed data from case studies, case series, and retrospective cohorts by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with no start date or language restrictions on Sep 4, 2021. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-six publications were included (458 cases in total, 216 with details). Systemic diseases associated with IGD/PNGD were classified into 5 groups. Autoimmune disorders (n = 103, 47.6%) including rheumatoid arthritis (n = 51, 23.6%), systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 20, 9.3%), and others were the most common across all underlying diseases, followed by drug eruption (n = 52, 24.1%) such as tumor necrotic factor inhibitor reaction (n = 18, 8.3%) and malignancies (n = 27, 12.5%) such as hematologic malignancy (n = 20, 9.3%). The rest were infectious diseases (n = 12, 5.6%) and accidental conditions (n = 3, 1.4%). CONCLUSION: IGD/PNGD might be associated with autoimmune disorders, drug eruption, malignancies, infectious diseases, and accidental conditions. Patients with IGD/PNGD need further follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Dermatitis , Erupciones por Medicamentos , Humanos , Dermatitis/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Granuloma/etiología , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones
11.
Mod Rheumatol ; 33(4): 700-707, 2023 Jul 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35920402

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the best choice of second-line therapy between tumour necrosis factor-inhibitor (TNFi) and biologics of different-mode-of-action (BDMA-rituximab/tocilizumab/abatacept) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by evaluating drug-survival following discontinuation of the first-line TNFi. METHODS: This retrospective drug-survival study was performed across two different hospitals by conventional-statistics and machine-learning approach. RESULTS: From a total of 435 patients, 213 (48.9%; TNFi = 122, BDMA = 91) discontinued their second-line biologic {median drug-survival: TNFi, 27 months [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 22-32] vs BDMA, 37 months (95%CI 32-52)}. As a second-line biologic, BDMA was likely to reduce the risk of treatment-discontinuation [hazard-ratio (HR) 0.63, 95%CI 0.48-0.83] compared to TNFi, but only in seropositive-patients (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.38-0.73), not in seronegative-RA. Drug-survival benefit of BDMA over TNFi was not observed if the seropositive-patients were previously exposed to monoclonal-TNFi (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.49-1.22) versus soluble-TNFi (etanercept/biosimilars) or if the first-line TNFi was terminated within 23.9 months of initiation (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.56-1.68). CONCLUSIONS: BDMA, as a second-line biologic, is more likely to be sustained in seropositive-patients, particularly without prior exposure to monoclonal-TNFi. The drug-survival benefit of BDMA was not observed in seronegative-patients or if the first-line TNFi was stopped within 2 years.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Terapia Biológica , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano
12.
Mod Rheumatol ; 33(6): 1097-1103, 2023 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36440707

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim is to clarify the differences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with certolizumab pegol (CZP) and infliximab (IFX). METHODS: The study included RA patients who received CZP or IFX and were examined with low-field MRI (compacTscan; compact magnetic resonance imaging) at the beginning and again within 6 months of treatment initiation. Comparisons were made regarding background, clinical course, and differences in MRI findings following initiation of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors between the CZP and IFX treatment groups. MRI findings were evaluated by scoring erosion, bone marrow oedema (BME), and synovitis. RESULTS: Ten cases in CZP and 18 cases in IFX group were compared. The biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naïve rate in the IFX group was significantly higher than that in the CZP group. After 6 months, disease activities were significantly decreased from baseline in both groups. Erosion score did not change significantly in both groups after 6 months. BME score was significantly decreased in the CZP group after 6 months, whereas in the IFX group, there was no significant change. Synovitis score was significantly decreased in both groups after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study suggest that, in patients with RA, CZP might improve BME more effectively than IFX.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Sinovitis , Humanos , Certolizumab Pegol/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Sinovitis/tratamiento farmacológico
13.
Mod Rheumatol ; 34(1): 11-26, 2023 Dec 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37022142

RESUMEN

The emergence of biologics with different modes of action (MoAs) and therapeutic targets has changed treatment patterns in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. While tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) are often utilized as the first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, some patients may not respond adequately (primary failure), fail to sustain response over time (secondary failure), or experience intolerable adverse events. Whether these patients would benefit more from cycling to a different TNFi or switching to a biologic with a different MoA is still unclear. We discuss here treatment outcomes of TNFi cycling versus MoA switching after treatment failure with a first TNFi in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, focusing specifically on rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Treatment guidelines for these patients are ambiguous and, at times, contradictory in their recommendations. However, this is due to a lack of high-quality head-to-head data to definitively support cycling between TNFis after failure to a first-line TNFi over switching to a different MoA.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Humanos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
14.
Clin Immunol ; 238: 109018, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35460903

RESUMEN

Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) can cause significant morbidity, including bone pain and damage. In the absence of clinical trials, treatments include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, TNF-inhibitors (TNFi) and/or bisphosphonates. In a retrospective chart review in the United Kingdom and Germany, we investigated response to TNFi and/or pamidronate. Ninety-one patients were included, receiving pamidronate (n = 47), TNFi (n = 22) or both sequentially (n = 22). Patients with fatigue [p = 0.003] and/or arthritis [p = 0.002] were more frequently treated with TNFi than pamidronate. Both therapies were associated with clinical remission at 6 months, and reduction of bone lesions on MRI at 12 months. While not reaching statistical significance, pamidronate resulted in faster resolution of MRI lesions. Fewer flares were observed with TNFi. Failure to respond to pamidronate was associated with female sex [p = 0.027], more lesions on MRI [p = 0.01] and higher CRP levels [p = 0.03]. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm observations and generate evidence.


Asunto(s)
Difosfonatos , Osteomielitis , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteomielitis/patología , Pamidronato/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral
15.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(7): 2875-2885, 2022 07 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34791107

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Fat lesions (FLs) on MRI T1 sequences are considered to be early indicators of structural spinal progression in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients. In this post-hoc analysis from RAPID-axSpA, we assess whether tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment over 4 years impacts FLs in spinal vertebral edges (VEs) of patients with axSpA. METHODS: In RAPID-axSpA (NCT01087762), a 4-year, phase 3 randomized trial, participants were randomized to certolizumab pegol (CZP; 400 mg loading dose at Weeks 0/2/4 then 200/400 mg every 2/4 weeks) or placebo (PBO) at baseline; PBO-randomized participants switched to CZP at Week 16/24 (denoted PBO-randomized/CZP). Spinal MRI scans were taken at Weeks 0, 12, 48, 96 and 204. Changes in proportions of VEs with FLs are reported as odds ratios (ORs) between time points. RESULTS: Overall, 136 participants (CZP: 89, PBO-randomized/CZP: 47) had a baseline and ≥1 post-baseline MRI. The OR (95% confidence interval) vs baseline of FLs was higher in PBO-randomized/CZP vs CZP-randomized participants at Weeks 48 [3.35 (2.16-5.19) vs 1.45 (1.07-1.97)], 96 [2.62 (1.77-3.88) vs 1.84 (1.36-2.48)] and 204 [2.55 (1.59-4.06) vs 1.71 (1.23-2.37)]. Across 204 weeks, FLs increased more in VEs with baseline inflammation [Week 204 OR: 4.84 (2.56-9.18)] than those without [OR: 1.15 (0.78-1.71)]. VEs in which inflammation was resolved by Week 12 had lower FL prevalence at Weeks 48, 96 and 204 compared with VEs with unresolved inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Early and sustained suppression of inflammation mitigates the risk of long-term FL development in the spine in study participants with axSpA evaluated over 4 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01087762.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Espondiloartritis Axial , Espondiloartritis , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Certolizumab Pegol/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Espondiloartritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Espondiloartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(SI): SI6-SI13, 2022 04 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34791068

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reliability and validity of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET-CT scanning (FDG-PET) in RA patients with low disease activity tapering TNF inhibitors (TNFis) and its predictive value for successful tapering or discontinuation. METHODS: Patients in the tapering arm of the Dose REduction Strategies of Subcutaneous TNFi study, a randomized controlled trial of TNFi tapering in RA, underwent FDG-PET before tapering (baseline) and after maximal tapering. A total of 48 joints per scan were scored both visually [FDG-avid joint (FAJ), yes/no] and quantitatively [maximal and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean)]. Interobserver agreement was calculated in 10 patients at baseline. Quantitative and visual FDG-PET scores were investigated for (multilevel) association with clinical parameters both on a joint and patient level and for the predictive value at baseline and the change between baseline and maximal tapering (Δ) for successful tapering and discontinuation at 18 months. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients underwent FDG-PET. For performance of identification of FAJs on PET, Cohen's κ was 0.49 (range 0.35-0.63). For SUVmax and SUVmean, intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.80 (range 0.77-0.83) and 0.96 (0.9-1.0), respectively. On a joint level, swelling was significantly associated with SUVmax and SUVmean [B coefficients 1.0 (95% CI 0.73, 1.35) and 0.2 (0.08, 0.32), respectively]. On a patient level, only correlation with acute phase reactants was found. FDG-PET scores were not predictive of successful tapering or discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative FDG-PET arthritis scoring in RA patients with low disease activity is reliable and has some construct validity. However, no predictive values were found for FDG-PET parameters for successful tapering and/or discontinuation of TNFi.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radiofármacos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
17.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 57(12): 1435-1442, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35833832

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Project NORTH compared real-world clinical and economic outcomes in Swedish patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who switched from originator infliximab to its biosimilar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from electronic medical records and Swedish national registries were linked. Switchers (patients switching from originator infliximab to its biosimilar between 1 April 2014, and 31 December 2017) and non-switchers (patients who received originator infliximab and did not switch to a biosimilar by 31 December 2017) were followed up until 31 October 2019. RESULTS: Baseline concomitant medication use, disease duration, and inflammatory markers were lower among switchers than non-switchers. At 6 months, the proportion of patients with stable disease was higher among switchers than non-switchers (71/109 [65%] vs 54/107 [50%]; p = .0385); differences were not significant in subsequent follow-ups. At 6 and 24 months, 98% and 93% of switchers, respectively, used concomitant medications versus 96% and 79% of non-switchers. Throughout the study, all-cause treatment discontinuation occurred in 74 (67%) switchers and 105 (95%) non-switchers. At 36-months, mean (SD) number of IBD-related in-patient care days was higher among non-switchers (2.95 [4.71]) than switchers (1.40 [4.20]), as were total medical costs (€16,740 vs €3,872). CONCLUSIONS: No substantial differences in clinical outcomes or healthcare resource utilization were observed between switchers and non-switchers. Several analyses indicate that non-switchers might have more poorly controlled/severe disease than switchers at baseline. Overall, numerous difficulties might arise when executing a high-quality, real-world study, including possible selection bias for patients with better disease control for NMS, limiting the generalizability of the results.


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/inducido químicamente , Enfermedad Crónica , Sustitución de Medicamentos/métodos
18.
Rheumatol Int ; 42(5): 803-814, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35338383

RESUMEN

The study aimed to compare treatment retention for first-line TNF inhibitor (TNFi) in the ATTRA registry patients receiving either combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs or TNFi as monotherapy. A retrospective multicenter study analyzed data of all adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 3032) starting TNF inhibitor as the first-line biological therapy in combination with csDMARDs or in monotherapy from January 1st 2012 to December 31st 2020. Kaplan-Meier method was employed to calculate drug retentions. Survival curves of treatment retentions were compared through Log-rank test between the studied subgroups. The hazard ratio for drug discontinuation was assessed through univariate cox regression models. In patients who started the first line TNFi therapy, the median treatment retention was 47.7 (42.2; 53.1) months for combination therapy and 22.7 (14.9; 30.6) months for TNFi monotherapy (p < 0.001). Estimated one-year survival was higher in patients on TNFi combined with csDMARDs as compared with TNFi monotherapy (75.3% vs 65.7%); two-year survival rate was 63.2% vs 49.2%, three-year survival rate was 55.4% vs 42.4% and five-year survival 44.9% vs 26.4% of patients. The estimated survival on the first TNFi was higher in patients taking combination therapy with methotrexate than with other csDMARDs (p = 0.003). Use of csDMARDs co-medication was associated with significantly better first TNFi drug survival compared to monotherapy. The combination of TNFi with MTX is more effective than the combination with leflunomide, which did not demonstrate a significant effect.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/inducido químicamente , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , República Checa , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/uso terapéutico
19.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 47(12): 2320-2324, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36511097

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Immune disorder is a key trigger of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA); meanwhile, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) is a fundamental therapeutic for multiple immune and inflammatory diseases. Hence, this real-world study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of TNFi combined with intravenous immunoglobin (IVIG) and heparin therapy in RSA patients. METHODS: A total of 105 RSA patients who received TNFi+IVIG+Heparin (enoxaparin) (n = 48) or IVIG+Heparin (enoxaparin) (n = 57) were retrospectively included in this two-centre cohort study. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The live birth rate of RSA patients in the TNFi+IVIG+heparin group was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.6%-85.9%). Besides, the live birth rate in the IVIG+heparin group was 52.6% (95% CI: 42.8%-62.4%). By comparison, the live birth rate was higher in the TNFi+IVIG+heparin group compared to the IVIG+heparin group (p = 0.033). After adjustment by the multivariate logistic regression model using the enter method, TNFi+IVIG+Heparin was also superior to IVIG+Heparin regarding increased live birth rate (odds ratio [OR] = 2.941, p = 0.015). Moreover, TNFi+IVIG+Heparin (vs. IVIG+Heparin) also served as an independent factor for increased live birth rate (OR = 2.423, p = 0.035) by the forward stepwise method in the multivariate analysis. Gestational weeks at delivery (38.3 ± 1.3 vs. 37.7 ± 2.0 weeks, p = 0.155), newborn weight (3123.9 ± 332.1 vs. 3056.6 ± 287.4 g, p = 0.390), Apgar score of newborns (9.8 ± 0.5 vs. 9.7 ± 0.7, p = 0.271) were of no difference between TNFi+IVIG+Heparin and IVIG+Heparin groups. In terms of safety profile, the adverse events were of no difference between the TNFi+IVIG+Heparin and the IVIG+Heparin groups (all p > 0.05), either. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: TNFi combined with IVIG and heparin therapy improves the live birth rate but does not elevate the adverse events compared to IVIG and heparin therapy in RSA patients.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Habitual , Heparina , Embarazo , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Heparina/efectos adversos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Enoxaparina/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Aborto Habitual/tratamiento farmacológico
20.
Inflammopharmacology ; 30(4): 1363-1368, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35802282

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) is recently reported to treat noninfectious uveitis (NIU) effectively. However, as a new kind of TNFi, golimumab is just on the market in China for several years, and its administration for NIU treatment lacks sufficient evidence. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of golimumab in refractory NIU patients. METHODS: Thirty NIU patients with 49 affected eyes refractory to conventional treatments (corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents) were consecutively enrolled. They received treatment of TNFi (50 mg golimumab every 4 weeks) for at least 6 months. The anterior chamber cell grade, vitreous haziness grade, central macular thickness, and visual acuity were evaluated at baseline, month (M) 1, M3, and M6. RESULTS: After treatment, the anterior chamber cell grade declined from baseline (0.6 ± 0.7) to M6 (0.3 ± 0.5) (P < 0.001); the vitreous haziness grade decreased from baseline (1.2 ± 1.2) to M6 (0.4 ± 0.5) (P < 0.001); meanwhile, the central macular thickness also reduced from baseline (351.4 ± 90.8 µm) to M6 (271.8 ± 54.4 µm) (P < 0.001). In terms of visual acuity (LogMAR), it showed a declined trend from baseline (0.5 ± 0.3) to M6 (0.4 ± 0.2), but without statistical significance (P = 0.096). Subgroup analyses revealed that TNFi history related to decreased golimumab efficacy. In addition, 13.3% of patients had adverse events, including elevated liver enzymes (6.7%), fatigue (3.3%), and rash (3.3%). CONCLUSION: Golimumab is effective and safe for refractory NIU treatment, while a large-scale trial is still needed for verification.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Uveítis , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Humanos , Terapia Recuperativa , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uveítis/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA