Patient preferences for treatment in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a discrete choice experiment.

Aim: We quantified patient preferences for second-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma therapies, including attributes of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Materials & methods: Using a discrete choice experiment, we surveyed 224 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients from the USA and Europe. Patients chose between two treatment options defined by six attributes with predefined levels for overall survival, adverse events (severe cytokine-release syndrome, severe neurological toxicities, severe infection) and time to return to pre-treatment functioning. Results: Increasing the probability of 1-year survival was most important to patients, followed by avoiding risks of cytokine-release syndrome and neurological toxicities. Respondents required a 13-14 percentage point increased 1-year survival probability to accept risks of treatment-associated adverse events. Conclusion: Patients prioritize survival and will accept certain adverse event risks to gain survival improvements.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a new treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. CAR T-cell therapies are made from a patient's own cells, modified in a laboratory and used to attack cancer cells. While CAR T-cell therapies may increase long-term survival, they can also cause temporary but serious side effects, including neurological issues (e.g., headache, confusion, brain swelling) and cytokine-release syndrome (CRS), an inflammatory condition that can cause fever, breathing difficulties and organ dysfunction. To understand how patients' perspectives of CAR T-cell therapy compared with their perspectives on other treatments for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, we surveyed 224 patients in the USA and Europe. They were asked to choose between two treatments in a series of choice sets, each displaying varying levels of aspects of cancer therapies, including survival and risks of serious side effects. Their choices allowed us to measure which factors were most important to patients when making decisions about treatment. We found that increasing the probability of survival was most important, followed by avoiding risks of neurological complications and CRS. Patients were willing to accept increased risks of neurological toxicities and CRS if they could obtain a 13­14 percentage point increase in the probability of surviving for at least 1 year after treatment.

Comparative effectiveness study of chemotherapy in follicular lymphoma patients in the rituximab era: a Japanese claims database study.

Aim: To evaluate comparative effectiveness of rituximub (R)-based versus non-R-based therapies for follicular lymphoma patients in Japan, where limited studies have been reported. Materials & methods: Patients who received R-based index regimens were propensity score matched to those who did not receive R, based on patient baseline attributes and clinical characteristics using Japanese retrospective claims database to assess clinical and economic outcomes. Results & conclusion: A total of 1947 patients remained in the overall follicular lymphoma cohorts: 1294 receiving an R-based and 653 a non-R-based regimen. Patients on R-based therapy underwent fewer hospitalizations and had a shorter length of stay, but had higher costs during the first year of intensive R-based therapy. Improved clinical outcomes were associated with patients who were younger, female and chose R-based regimens in first index line.

Plain language summary of the TRANSFORM study primary analysis results: liso-cell as a second treatment regimen for large B-cell lymphoma following failure of the first treatment regimen.

What is this summary about? People diagnosed with a disease called large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may experience return, or early relapse, of their disease within the first year after receiving and responding to their first (first-line) treatment regimen. Others may have primary refractory disease, meaning that the disease either did not respond to first-line treatment at all or only responded for a very brief period. Second (second-line) treatment includes immunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT, which has the potential to cure LBCL. However, if the disease does not respond to immunotherapy, people cannot receive ASCT, and less than 30% of people are cured.Therefore, new second-line treatment options are required, such as CAR T cell therapy, which uses a person's own genetically engineered lymphocytes, also called T cells, to fight their lymphoma. In this article, we summarize the key results of the phase 3 TRANSFORM clinical study that tested if liso-cel, a CAR T cell treatment, can safely and effectively be used as a second-line treatment for people with early relapsed or primary refractory (relapsed/refractory) LBCL.A total of 184 adults with relapsed/refractory LBCL who were able to receive ASCT were randomly treated with either liso-cel or standard of care (SOC) as second-line treatment. SOC included immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT.What were the key takeaways? Almost all (97%) people in the liso-cel group completed treatment, whereas 53% of people in the SOC group did not complete treatment, mostly due to their disease not responding or relapsing, and therefore they were not able to receive ASCT. People who received liso-cel as a second-line treatment lived longer without the occurrence of an unfavorable medical event or worsening of the disease and had a better response to treatment than those who received SOC as second-line treatment. People who received liso-cel reported side effects that researchers considered to be manageable, and that were known to occur with CAR T cell treatment.What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers? Results from the TRANSFORM study support the use of liso-cel as a more effective second-line treatment compared with SOC that is safe for people with relapsed/refractory LBCL.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03575351 (TRANSFORM study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

ROBUST: Lenalidomide-R-CHOP versus placebo-R-CHOP in previously untreated ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Activated B-cell-like (ABC) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the major constituent of nongerminal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) DLBCL, is associated with poorer survival outcomes than GCB-type DLBCL. In Phase II studies, lenalidomide combined with R-CHOP (R(2)-CHOP) improved outcomes relative to historical R-CHOP in newly diagnosed DLBCL, particularly in non-GCB cases. ROBUST (CC-5013-DLC-002) is a randomized, double-blind, global, Phase III study of oral lenalidomide (15 mg, days 1-14) plus R-CHOP21 × 6 versus placebo-R-CHOP21 × 6 in patients with previously untreated ABC-type DLBCL. Subtyping is done within 3 calendar days by central laboratory gene-expression profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy tissue. The primary end point is progression-free survival. Secondary end points include response rates, overall survival and health-related quality of life.