Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1394168, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841170

RESUMEN

Secondary prostate cancer typically occurs from direct seeding of a renal or bladder tumor. Metastasis via hematogenous spread is exceedingly rare and is typically identified incidentally at autopsy. This report describes a 72-year-old male with lung adenocarcinoma initially staged as Stage IA2 who developed oligometastatic disease of the prostate. He was initially treated with radiation therapy and was found to have a hypermetabolic focus in the prostate gland during surveillance PET/CT imaging 6 months following treatment. Subsequent biopsy revealed metastatic lung adenocarcinoma in 6/6 core samples, leading to diagnosis of oligometastatic disease of the prostate. To our knowledge, this is the first report of isolated oligometastatic disease to the prostate from a primary lung adenocarcinoma.

2.
IJU Case Rep ; 3(4): 121-124, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33392467

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Secondary bladder, colon, and rectal cancers are relatively common after prostate radiotherapy. However, secondary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate is rare. CASE PRESENTATION: An 85-year-old man presented with dysuria and low-serum prostate-specific antigen levels. His medical history included localized prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score of 4 + 5) treated with combined three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy, 11 years ago. Urethroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging showed a bulging mass around the prostatic urethra. Transurethral resection of the prostate performed for histopathological diagnosis revealed squamous cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Hereby, a rare case of secondary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate after radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma was reported, which was found after 11 years of radiotherapy with symptom of dysuria including urinary hesitancy, difficulty, pain during urination, and low-serum prostate-specific antigen levels.

3.
Prostate Int ; 5(3): 89-94, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28828351

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine temporal trends in the receipt of prostatectomy or locoregional radiation to the prostate for patients with metastatic prostate cancer and to identify predictors of receipt of local treatment. METHODS: We identified 39,976 patients with metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed in 2004-2012 using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We used logistic multivariable regression to determine trends in the receipt of prostate and/or pelvic radiation or radical prostatectomy after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: Patients with metastatic disease were less likely to receive locoregional treatment over time [7.88% in 2004 vs. 5.53% in 2012, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.97 per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95-0.98; P < 0.001]. Cofactors associated with decreased likelihood for locoregional treatment included older age (AOR = 0.96 per year, 95% CI = 0.96-0.96, P < 0.001) and increased comorbidity level (1 comorbidity: AOR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.73-0.93, P = 0.001; two or more comorbidities: AOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.39-0.61, P < 0.001). Decreasing utilization of both radiation and surgery of the primary site contributed to this trend. More specifically, patients with metastatic disease were less likely to receive radiation to the prostate and/or pelvis over time (5.9% in 2004 vs. 4.2% in 2012, AOR = 0.97 per year, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99, P < 0.001). Similarly, there was a trend toward decreased use of radical prostatectomy (2.17% in 2004 compared to 1.31% in 2012, AOR = 0.96 per year, 95% CI 0.93-0.99, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite recent evidence of the possible benefit for locoregional treatment of prostate cancer in the setting of metastatic disease, rates of prostate radiation and radical prostatectomy among this population have actually declined over the 8-year period between 2004 and 2012, suggesting slow adoption of this novel treatment paradigm.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA