Immersive virtual reality in orthopaedics-a narrative review.

PURPOSE: This narrative review explores the applications and benefits of immersive virtual reality (VR) in orthopaedics, with a focus on surgical training, patient functional recovery, and pain management. METHODS: The review examines existing literature and research studies on immersive VR in orthopaedics, analyzing both experimental and clinical studies. RESULTS: Immersive VR provides a realistic simulation environment for orthopaedic surgery training, enhancing surgical skills, reducing errors, and improving overall performance. In post-surgical recovery and rehabilitation, immersive VR environments can facilitate motor learning and functional recovery through virtual embodiment, motor imagery during action observation, and virtual training. Additionally VR-based functional recovery programs can improve patient adherence and outcomes. Moreover, VR has the potential to revolutionize pain management, offering a non-invasive, drug-free alternative. Virtual reality analgesia acts by a variety of means including engagement and diverting patients' attention, anxiety reduction, and specific virtual-body transformations. CONCLUSION: Immersive virtual reality holds significant promise in orthopaedics, demonstrating potential for improved surgical training, patient functional recovery, and pain management but further research is needed to fully exploit the benefits of VR technology in these areas.

Opioid Use After Colorectal Resection: Identifying Preoperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Use.

INTRODUCTION: Appropriate prescribing practices are imperative to ensure adequate pain control, without excess opioid dispensing across colorectal patients. METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Kentucky All Scheduled Prescription Electronic Reporting, and patient charts were queried to complete a retrospective study of elective colorectal resections, performed by a fellowship-trained colorectal surgeon, from January 2013 to December 2020. Opioid use at 14 d and 30 d posthospital discharge converted into morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were analyzed and compared across preadmission and inpatient factors. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred twenty seven colorectal surgeries including 56.1% (N = 800) partial colectomy, 24.1% (N = 344) low anterior resection, 8.3% (N = 119) abdominoperineal resection, 8.4% (N = 121) sub/total colectomy, and 3.0% (N = 43) total proctocolectomy. Abdominoperineal resection and sub/total colectomy patients had higher 30-day postdischarge MMEs (P < 0.001, P = 0.041). An operative approach did not affect postdischarge MMEs (P = 0.440). Trans abdominal plane blocks do not predict postdischarge MMEs (0.616). Epidural usage provides a 15% increase in postdischarge MMEs (P = 0.020). Age (P < 0.001), smoking (P < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.006, < 0.001), dyspnea (P = 0.001, < 0.001), albumin < 3.5 (P = 0.085, 0.010), disseminated cancer (P = 0.018, 0.001), and preadmission MMEs (P < 0.001) predict elevated 14-day and 30-day postdischarge MMEs. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that perioperative analgesic procedures, as enhanced recovery pathway suggests, are neither predictive nor protective of postoperative discharge MMEs in colorectal surgery. Provider should account for preoperative risk factors when prescribing discharge opioid medications. Furthermore, providers should identify appropriate adjunct procedures to improve discharge opioid prescription stewardship.

Satisfaction with opioid prescription and use after minor gynaecologic surgery: a pilot prospective study.

To describe predictors of patient satisfaction with pain control including opioid prescribing practices, patients undergoing minor gynaecologic and urogynaecologic surgeries were included in a prospective cohort study. Satisfaction with postoperative pain control by opioid prescription status was analysed using bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression, controlling for potential confounders. Among participants completing both postoperative surveys, 112/141 (79.4%) reported pain control satisfaction by day 1-2 and 118/137 (86.1%) by day 14. While we were underpowered to detect a true difference in satisfaction by opioid prescription, there were no differences in opioid prescription among patients satisfied with pain control [52% vs. 60% (p = .43) among satisfied patients at day 1-2 and 58.5% vs. 37% (p = .08) at day 14]. Significant predictors of pain control satisfaction were postoperative day (POD) 1-2 average pain at rest [aOR 0.72 (95% CI 0.52-0.99), p = .04], rating of shared decision-making [aOR 1.16 (95% CI 1.004-1.34), p = .04], amount of pain relief [aOR 1.28 (95% CI 1.07-1.54), p = .008) and POD 14 shared decision-making rating [aOR 1.45 (95% CI 1.19-1.77), p = .002].Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? There are little data published on opioid prescription rates after minor gynaecologic procedures and no formal evidence-based guidance for gynaecologic providers for opioid prescribing. Few publications describe rates of opioid prescription and use following minor gynaecologic procedures. In the setting of a dramatic escalation of opioid misuse in the United States over the last decade, we sought to describe our practice of opioid prescription following minor gynaecologic procedures and answer the question of whether patient satisfaction is affected by opioid prescription, fill and use.What do the results of this study add? Though underpowered to detect our primary outcome, our results suggest that patient satisfaction with pain control may primarily be significantly affected by the patient's subjective assessment of shared decision-making with the gynaecologist.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Ultimately, these preliminary findings suggest a larger cohort is needed to answer the question of whether pain control satisfaction is influenced by receipt/fill/use of opioids after minor gynaecologic surgery.

Patient-reported physical function as a preoperative predictor of recovery after vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative risk assessment in vascular surgery often relies on the clinical subjectivity of providers and assessment tools with poor discrimination. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may provide a more objective assessment of an individual's own health status before surgery and ability to recover after a vascular procedure. We designed this study to determine whether PROMs assessed for physical function (PROM-PF) prior to vascular surgery could be used to predict patient risk for postoperative complications and delayed recovery. METHODS: We identified all patients who completed a PROM-PF survey prior to undergoing a vascular surgery procedure captured in the Society for Vascular Surgery-Vascular Quality Initiative registry (carotid endarterectomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm, endovascular aneurysm repair, thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair, peripheral vascular intervention, infra-inguinal bypass, and supra-inguinal bypass) at a single academic institution between January 2016 and June 2020. PROM-PF assessment was obtained electronically using the validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System short form (v1.2) instrument. All patient demographics and comorbidities were collected as part of the Society for Vascular Surgery-Vascular Quality Initiative registry. After stratifying patients based on high vs low preoperative PROM-PF, multivariable regression models were used to assess the risk-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for perioperative complications, extended hospital length of stay (LOS), and discharge to a care facility. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients (mean age, 68 years; 69% male; and 88% Caucasian) completed a PROM-PF assessment <30 days before a vascular surgery intervention, of which 54% had low PF. Patients with high PF were more likely than those with low PF to undergo an open vascular procedure (43% high PF vs 42% low PF; P < .001). Rates of perioperative complications and/or mortality were similar between groups, although patients with low-PF were more likely to have an extended hospital LOS (48% low PF vs 33% high PF; P < .05) and/or be discharged to a care facility (17% low PF vs 7% high PF; P < .05). These results were confirmed in risk-adjusted models showing that patients with low PF scores were significantly more likely to have an extended LOS (adjusted OR, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.28) and be discharged to a care facility (adjusted OR, 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-7.00). CONCLUSIONS: Low preoperative PROM-PF was associated with a higher risk of extended inpatient LOS and discharge to a care facility following vascular surgery. PROMs allow patients to provide valuable presurgical information about their own health status that can be used to anticipate postoperative recovery.

The PSR13, a tool for evaluating patient-perceived recovery after vaginal prolapse repair surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Surgical recovery is the return to preoperative functional, psychologic, and social activity, or a return to normalcy. To date, little is known about the global post-surgical recovery experience from the patients' perspective. The aim of this study was to validate the Post-Discharge Surgical Recovery scale 13 (PSR13) in women undergoing vaginal prolapse repair procedures and evaluate the patient-perceived postoperative recovery experience over a 12-week period. METHODS: Fifty women undergoing vaginal prolapse repairs completed the PSR13 and global surgical recovery scale (GSR) at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks post-surgery. Validity, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and responsiveness to change over time of the PSR13 was evaluated using descriptive statistics and linear regression models. The proportion of patients deemed fully recovered at each time point (defined as PSR13 score ≥ 80) was also assessed. RESULTS: The PSR13 correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with the single-item recovery scale and showed excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach α = 0.91, range 0.77 to 0.93). The MCID was estimated at 7.0 points. The PSR13 scores improved at varying rates over time, with the greatest amount of patient-perceived recovery occurring between 4 and 6 weeks after surgery. The proportion of patients deemed fully recovered at 6- and 12- weeks postoperatively was 37% and 56%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PSR13 is a useful instrument to assess overall return to normalcy from the patient's perspective and can be applied to evaluate the recovery experience among women undergoing vaginal prolapse repairs, in both the research and clinical setting.

Recovery expectancies impact postdischarge recovery 42 days after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine if recovery expectancies were associated with actual postdischarge recovery after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: Study subjects (N = 167) undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy were asked to preoperatively predict the likelihood of a prolonged postdischarge recovery (> 42 days). Low, medium, and high recovery expectancy groups were created from responses to the likelihood of prolonged postdischarge recovery question. Previously established predictors of actual recovery 42 days after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy included age, body mass index, Charlson co-morbidity index, short form (SF)-36 bodily pain scores, doctors' and others' health locus of control, and sick role investment. One parsimonious hierarchical linear and logistic regression model was constructed to determine if preoperative recovery expectancies were independently associated with PSR13 scores and "significant" postdischarge recovery after controlling for previously established predictors. RESULTS: Study subjects with high recovery expectancies had higher PSR13 scores than subjects with low recovery expectancies (82.32 ± 15.34 vs 73.30 ± 15.30, mean difference 9.01, 95%CI 1.08-16.94). Study subjects with low recovery expectancies scored 7.7 points lower on the PSR13 scale (minimally important difference = 5), which translated into a 73% reduction in the likelihood of being "significantly" recovered 42 days after surgery, after controlling for previously established predictors. CONCLUSIONS: A low recovery expectancy has a negative impact on actual recovery 42 days after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Our findings are important because preoperative recovery expectancies are modifiable predictors, making them a candidate for an expectancy manipulation intervention designed to optimize recovery after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Impact of preoperative surgical anxiety on postoperative surgical recovery among surgical patients: Role of surgical coping.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the moderating impact of surgical coping in the relationship between pre-operative surgical anxiety and post-operative surgical recovery. METHODS: The descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the surgical department of various hospitals across Punjab, including the Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, District Headquarters Teaching Hospital, Sargodha, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, and Margalla Institute of Health Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from May 1, 2018, to May 1, 2019. It comprised surgical patients of either gender aged 18-60 years. Data was collected using the Amsterdam Pre-operative Anxiety and Information Scale, the Surgical Recovery Scale, and the Coping with Surgical Stress Scale. Moderation analysis was applied using PROCESS Macro 3.2. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients, 85(42.5%) were males and 115(57.5%) were females. The overall mean age was 36.34±12.64 years. Threat avoidance (p<0.001) and information-seeking (p<0.001) coping strategies moderated the relationship between surgical anxiety and surgical recovery of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of appropriate coping strategy for prompt recovery post-surgery is critical.

Patient expectations for recovery after elective surgery: a common-sense model approach.

Patient perceptions of the causes of preoperative symptoms, expected impact of surgery on symptoms and anticipated timeline of recovery are likely to affect the risk of readmission following elective surgical procedures. However, these perceptions have not been studied. A qualitative study was designed to explore these perceptions, using the common-sense model of self-regulation (CSM) as the conceptual framework. CSM is grounded in illness representations, describing how patients make sense of changes in physical well-being (e.g. symptoms) and develop and assess management plans. It also establishes a broader framework for examining patients' a priori expectations and timelines for outcomes based on comparisons to prior experiences and underlying self-prototypes, or "Self as Anchor". A convenience sample of 14 patients aged 56-81 who underwent elective surgery was recruited. Semi-structured interviews informed by the CSM were completed on the day of discharge. Content analysis with deductive coding was used, and emerging themes were fit to components of the CSM, including the five domains of Illness Representations-identity, cause, timeline, control, and consequences. Two additional themes, outlook (toward the health care system, providers and recovery efforts), and motivation (external or internal for recovering), relate to self-prototypes, expectations for outcomes, and search for coherence. Misattribution of symptoms, unrealistic expectations for outcomes (e.g. expecting complete resolution of symptoms unrelated to the surgical procedure) and timelines for recovery (unrealistically short), and the (baseline) "normal healthy self" as distinct from the (temporarily) "sick self" were recurrent themes. Findings suggest that patient perceptions and the actual recovery process may be misaligned. The results underscore the importance of assessing patients' perceptions and expectations, actively engaging patients in their own healthcare, and providing adequate support during the transition to home.

Perioperative surgical home models and enhanced recovery after surgery.

In recent years, numerous initiatives have been introduced to address changes in health-care costs, delivery methods, reimbursements, and the health-care needs of our aging population. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) defines the Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) as a patient-centric, team-based model of care to help meet the demands of a rapidly approaching health-care paradigm emphasizing value, patient satisfaction, and a reduction in costs. Enhanced recovery pathways were initially established by a group of surgeons from Europe who formed a research group with the aim to explore the ultimate care pathway for patients undergoing colonic resections. Similar protocols were later expanded to various surgical specialties with promising outcomes. A PubMed and World Wide Web search was performed with the following key words: "ERAS®," "enhanced recovery after surgery," "PSH," "perioperative surgical home," "protocols," "outcomes." Articles found were published over a 20-year time range (1997-2017). In the present investigation, the most common elements of enhanced recovery protocols are reviewed. Review of how existence of a PSH model facilitates the creation of an enhanced recovery protocol and improves cost-efficiency, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes observed in enhanced recovery studies that are applicable to health-care systems universally is described.

Postanesthesia Scoring Methods: An Integrative Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE: Internationally there is no consensus on the indicators essential for determining safe recovery from anesthesia and patient readiness for discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). DESIGN: Integrative review. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) as a search strategy, the literature related to PACU discharge scores were evaluated and organized into themes. FINDINGS: The traditional components of airway support, oxygenation, sedation, and circulation are common within many first stage PACU discharge scores. However, there is strong support from the literature for components such as heart rate, temperature, pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), urine output, and surgical site assessment to also be included. The review revealed that there is no standardized time frequency in applying a first stage PACU discharge score to patients within the PACU environment. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for the development and trial of an evidence based first stage PACU discharge score.

ERAS and Gastrointestinal Site Infections: Insights from a Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are proposed to enhance perioperative care, but their impact on various surgical outcomes requires further insight. Objective: This extensive meta-analysis aimed to systematically estimate the effectiveness of ERAS in reducing postoperative complications and improving recovery metrics. Materials and Methods: We meticulously searched multiple databases and rigorously screened studies, ultimately including 16 high-quality research articles in our meta-analysis. We carefully assessed heterogeneity using the Cochran Q test and I2 index. Results were visualized using forest plots, displaying effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The current meta-analysis reveals compelling evidence of ERAS protocols' impact on postoperative effects. Lung infection rates were significantly reduced, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.4393 (95% CI: 0.2674; 0.7216, p = 0.0012), highlighting the protocols' effectiveness. Although the reduction in surgical site infections (SSIs) was not significant, with an OR of 0.8003 (95% CI: 0.3908; 1.6389, p = 0.5425), the data suggests a trend toward benefit. Urinary tract infections (UTI) also showed a promising decrease, with an OR of 0.4754 (95% CI: 0.2028; 1.1143, p = 0.0871), revealing ERAS protocols may mitigate UTI risks. No significant effects were observed on postoperative anastomotic leakage or ileus, with ORs indicating neutrality. The incidence of readmission was similarly unaffected, with an OR of 1.4018 (95% CI: 0.6860; 2.8647, p = 0.3543). These outcomes underscore the selective efficacy of ERAS protocols, advocating for their strategic implementation to optimize surgical recovery. Conclusions: This meta-analysis offers compelling evidence supporting the implementation of ERAS in mitigating specific post-surgical conditions. It underscores the potential of ERAS to enhance recovery experiences and improve healthcare efficiency. Further targeted research is warranted to fully understand the impact of ERAS on SSI, anastomotic leakage, ileus, and readmissions and to optimize its benefits across diverse surgical populations.

Efficacy of intraoperative systemic lidocaine on quality of recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Many clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of intraoperative systemic lidocaine administration in major abdominal surgeries. We tested the hypothesis that systemic lidocaine is associated with an enhanced early quality of recovery in patients following laparoscopic colorectal resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly allocated 126 patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lidocaine (1.5 mg kg-1 bolus over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion at 2 mg kg-1 h-1 until the end of surgery) or identical volumes and rates of saline. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 score assessed 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were areas under the pain numeric rating scale curve over time, 48-h morphine consumption, and adverse events. RESULTS: Compared with saline, systemic lidocaine improved the Quality of Recovery-15 score 24 h postoperatively, with a median difference of 4 (95% confidence interval: 1-6; p = 0.015). Similarly, the area under the pain numeric rating scale curve over 48 h at rest and on movement was reduced in the lidocaine group (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, these differences were not clinically meaningful. Lidocaine infusion reduced the intraoperative remifentanil requirements but not postoperative 48-h morphine consumption (p < 0.001 and p = 0.34, respectively). Additionally, patients receiving lidocaine had a quicker and earlier return of bowel function, as indicated by a shorter time to first flatus (log-rank p < 0.001), yet ambulation time was similar between groups (log-rank test, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery, intraoperative systemic lidocaine resulted in statistically but not clinically significant improvements in quality of recovery (see Graphical Abstract).Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; ChiCTR1900027635.

Systemic lidocaine failed to clinically improve the overall quality of recovery following laparoscopic colorectal resection.Systemic lidocaine reduced intraoperative remifentanil and time to first flatus but not postoperative 48-h morphine consumption.No differences emerged in patient-reported outcomes like opioid side effects, mobility, or satisfaction between groups postoperatively.

Topical lyophilized thrombin application improves wound healing for posterior spinal surgery.

Background: The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) was proposed as a part of the postoperative multimodal analgesic regimen to improve pain management after posterior spinal surgery. However, ESPB might cause more surgical incisional wound exudate and poor wound healing, which might be improved after topical lyophilized thrombin application. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study on patients who received posterior spinal surgery between January 2018 and December 2021. These patients were assigned into three groups: group A (general anesthesia), group B (general anesthesia with ESPB), and group C (general anesthesia with ESPB and topical 1000-unit thrombin application). Postoperative outcomes, including times of dressing changes, duration of suture removal, and incisional wound healing, were compared among these groups. Results: Our study included 89 patients, with 48, 20, and 21 patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Baseline demographics, height, weight, comorbidities, and operation duration were comparable among the three groups. Group B required statistically significantly more dressing changes and had a prolonged duration of suture removal than group A (9.4 ± 4.7 versus 6.5 ± 2.0 times, 16.2 ± 3.7 versus 14.2 ± 1.4 days, respectively), which could be statistically significantly improved after the thrombin application in group C. Group B also had more frequent poor wound healing (25.0 %), which could also be improved after the thrombin application (0.0 %). Conclusions: ESPB could cause more dressing changes and poor surgical wound healing after posterior spinal surgery, which could be improved by topical lyophilized thrombin powder application.

Development of Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict the Risk of Incontinence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Introduction: Predicting postoperative incontinence beforehand is crucial for intensified and personalized rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Although nomograms exist, their retrospective limitations highlight artificial intelligence (AI)'s potential. This study seeks to develop a machine learning algorithm using robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) data to predict postoperative incontinence, advancing personalized care. Materials and Methods: In this propsective observational study, patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing RARP between April 2022 and January 2023 were assessed. Preoperative variables included age, body mass index, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, digital rectal examination (DRE) results, Gleason score, International Society of Urological Pathology grade, and continence and potency questionnaires responses. Intraoperative factors, postoperative outcomes, and pathological variables were recorded. Urinary continence was evaluated using the Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite questionnaire, and machine learning models (XGBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression) were explored to predict incontinence risk. The chosen model's SHAP values elucidated variables impacting predictions. Results: A dataset of 227 patients undergoing RARP was considered for the study. Post-RARP complications were predominantly low grade, and urinary continence rates were 74.2%, 80.7%, and 91.4% at 7, 13, and 90 days after catheter removal, respectively. Employing machine learning, XGBoost proved the most effective in predicting postoperative incontinence risk. Significant variables identified by the algorithm included nerve-sparing approach, age, DRE, and total PSA. The model's threshold of 0.67 categorized patients into high or low risk, offering personalized predictions about the risk of incontinence after surgery. Conclusions: Predicting postoperative incontinence is crucial for tailoring rehabilitation after RARP. Machine learning algorithm, particularly XGBoost, can effectively identify those variables more heavily, impacting the outcome of postoperative continence, allowing to build an AI-driven model addressing the current challenges in post-RARP rehabilitation.

Exploring the impact of rehabilitation on post-surgical recovery in elbow fracture patients: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Elbow fractures, characterized by their complexity, present significant challenges in post-surgical recovery, with rehabilitation playing a critical role in functional outcomes. This study explores the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions in enhancing joint range of motion (ROM) and reducing complications following surgery for both stable and unstable elbow fractures. METHODS: A cohort of 15 patients, divided based on the stability of their elbow fractures and whether they received post-operative rehabilitation, was analyzed retrospectively. Measurements of ROM-including flexion, extension, pronation, and supination-were taken at three follow-ups: 15-, 30-, and 45-day post surgery. The study assessed the impact of rehabilitation on ROM recovery and the resolution of post-surgical complications. RESULTS: The findings indicated no statistically significant differences in ROM improvements between patients who underwent rehabilitation and those who did not, across all types of movements measured. However, early rehabilitative care was observed to potentially aid in the mitigation of complications such as joint stiffness, especially in patients with stable fractures. CONCLUSION: While rehabilitation did not universally improve ROM recovery in elbow fracture patients, it showed potential in addressing post-operative complications. The study underscores the importance of individualized rehabilitation plans and highlights the need for further research to establish evidence-based guidelines for post-surgical care in elbow fractures.

The Surgical Recovery Score correlates with the development of complications following elective colectomy.

BACKGROUND: The Surgical Recovery Score (SRS) is a validated, comprehensive recovery assessment tool used to measure functional recovery after major surgery. To further evaluate its clinical applicability, this study investigated whether the SRS correlates with clinical outcomes and the occurrence of complications after elective colectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for consecutive patients undergoing elective colonic resection within an enhanced recovery program at our institution from September 2008 to September 2011. We administered the 31-item SRS questionnaire preoperatively (baseline) and on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30. We scored individual questionnaires as a percentage of the maximum possible score, with a higher SRS indicating improved functional recovery (range, 17-100). We prospectively recorded clinical outcomes and graded 30-d complications as per the Clavien-Dindo classification. We conducted univariate and logistic regression analysis to determine the correlation of the SRS to the development of complications. RESULTS: We evaluated 134 patients, 62 of whom developed minor complications (grades 1-2) (46%) and 21 of whom developed major complications (grades 3-5) (16%). The SRS was similar at baseline in the complicated and uncomplicated groups but significantly lower on postoperative days 3, 7, 14, and 30 in patients who developed major complications, and on days 7 and 14 in patients who developed minor complications. In a logistic regression analysis, the SRS on postoperative day 3 was independently associated with the development of any complication, as well as major complications specifically. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to measuring functional recovery, the SRS closely correlates with the development of complications after elective colectomy and offers a reliable outcome measure to assess overall postoperative recovery.

The effect of discharge training developed based on nursing interventions classification (NIC) on surgical recovery in oncology patients: Randomized controlled trial - A pilot study.

AIM: To investigate the effect of discharge training on surgical recovery in oncology patients. DESIGN: A two-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04862104) and reporting according to the CONSORT checklist. METHODS: The study was conducted with 78 patients who had undergone cancer surgery in a university hospital. The intervention group took discharge training; the control group received routine care. The surgical recovery was measured before discharge and 2, 4 and 8 weeks after the discharge. RESULTS: There was a higher surgical recovery score in the intervention group compared with the usual care group at the second, fourth and eighth week after discharge. This study is expected to support discharge training as enhancing recovery in oncology surgical patients. CONCLUSION: This pilot study shows that discharge training developed based on the Nursing Intervention Classification can be used in clinics to enhance the surgical recovery of patients.

Disparities in lung cancer short- and long-term outcomes after surgery: Analysis from the national cancer database.

INTRODUCTION: Social determinants of health are particularly important in lung cancer epidemiology. Previous studies have primarily associated social determinants with long-term outcomes, such as survival, but fail to include short-term outcomes after surgery. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to draw associations between social factors of patients with lung cancer and short-term post-surgical outcomes, while comparing them to prognostic factors, including stage at diagnosis and survival. METHODS: The 2004-17 NCDB was queried for patients with primary epithelial tumor, squamous cell carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the lung treated with curative intent. Linear, binary logistic, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were utilized. RESULTS: On logistic regression modeling, male gender, low income, lacking insurance, and facility in the central United States were associated with poor short-term outcomes (<0.05). Increased age, White race, and Black race were associated with increased length of hospital stay and mortality, but negatively correlated with readmission rates (<0.05). Medicare and Medicaid were associated with increased length of stay and mortality, respectively (<0.05). Similar patterns were observed for higher stage at diagnosis (<0.05). Hazard ratios were elevated with increased age, male gender, White race, lacking insurance, Medicaid, and facility in the central United States (<0.05). CONCLUSION: Many social factors previously associated with poor prognosis after lung cancer diagnosis are also associated with poor short-term outcomes after surgery. This study implies that healthcare providers treating lung cancer should proceed with care while aware that patients with the discussed social factors are predisposed to complicated recoveries.

Exploring the role of biopsy-proven diabetic axonal neuropathy in outcomes of carpal tunnel release in diabetic and non-diabetic populations.

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel release outcomes in diabetic and non-diabetic patients are conflicting, possibly due to lack of differentiating patients with axonal neuropathy and those without axonal neuropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five diabetic and 106 non-diabetic patients who failed conservative treatment and then underwent carpal tunnel release from 2015 to 2022 were selected from a hand surgeon's patient database. Diagnosis was established with parameters established with the CTS-6 Evaluation Tool, and electrodiagnosis when indicated. Patient outcomes were evaluated using preoperative and postoperative Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, Numeric Pain Scale, and Wong-Baker Pain Scale. Postoperative evaluations were taken 6 months to a year post-surgery. Skin biopsies for nerve fiber density and morphology were taken from 50 diabetic patients. Another 50 were taken from non-diabetic patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and served as controls. Biopsy-proven axonal neuropathy was used as a confounding variable in the assessment of diabetic patients' recovery RESULTS: When comparing diabetics with biopsy-proven axonal neuropathy to diabetics without axonal neuropathy, the recovery outcomes are increasingly better for diabetics without neuropathy. Diabetics with biopsy-proven neuropathy have an improvement in recovery outcomes as well; however, not to the level of non-diabetics. CONCLUSION: Patients with increased scale scores or clinical suspicion for axonal neuropathy can be offered the option of undergoing a biopsy, and counseled about the risks for increased time to meet outcomes comparable to non-diabetics and diabetics without axonal neuropathy.

Adoption of Enhanced Surgical Recovery (ESR) Protocol for Lumbar Fusion Decreases In-Hospital Postoperative Opioid Consumption.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the impact of ESR on in-hospital and 90-day postoperative opioid consumption, length of stay, urinary catheter removal and postoperative ambulation after lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions. METHODS: We evaluated patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery at a single, multi-surgeon center in the transition period prior to (N = 174) and after (N = 116) adoption of ESR, comparing in-hospital and 90-day postoperative opioid consumption. Regression analysis was used to control for confounders. Secondary analysis was preformed to evaluate the association between ESR and length of stay, urinary catheter removal and ambulation after surgery. RESULTS: Mean age study participants was 52.6 years with 62 (47%) females. Demographic characteristics were similar between the Pre-ESR and ESR groups. ESR patients had better 3-month pain scores, ambulated earlier, had urinary catheters removed earlier and decreased in-hospital opioid consumption compared to Pre-ESR patients. There was no difference in 90-day opioid consumption between the 2 groups. Regression analysis showed that ESR was strongly associated with in-hospital opioid consumption, accounting for 30% of the variability in Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME). In-hospital opioid consumption was also associated with preoperative pain scores, number of surgical levels, and insurance type (private vs government). Pre-op pain sores were associated with 90-day opioid consumption. Secondary analysis showed that ESR was associated with a shorter length of stay and earlier ambulation. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed ESR has the potential to improve recovery after lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions with reduced in-hospital opioid consumption and improved postoperative pain scores.