Experimental Study of the Biodistribution of New Bone-Seeking Compounds Based on Phosphonic Acids and Gallium-68.

We investigate biodistribution of gallium-labeled hydroxyethylidenediphosphonic acid (68Ga-HEDP) and diethylenetriaminepentakis(methylenephosphonic acid) (68Ga-DTPMP) in intact Wistar rats. It was shown that 68Ga-DTPMP accumulated mainly in the bone tissue providing high femur/blood and femur/muscle ratios and had high stability in vivo. In contrast, 68Ga-HEDP was characterized by low stability and high uptake of radioactivity in blood throughout the study. So 68Ga-DTPMP can be considered as a new prospective radiotracer in oncology for imaging bone tissue metastasis by positron emission tomography.

Anti-reabsorptive agents in women with osteoporosis: determining statistical equivalence according to evidence-based methods.

BACKGROUND: In the present study, we undertook an equivalence analysis on the effectiveness of the main anti-reabsorptive agents indicated for women with osteoporosis. METHODS: Our methodology was a combination of meta-analysis (both pair-wise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis) and equivalence testing. The end-point was the incidence on new vertebral fractures. The anti-reabsorptive agents examined included alendronate, zoledronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and denosumab. RESULTS: Our analysis involved nine randomized trials. Ten head-to-head indirect comparisons were examined through network meta-analysis and the respective values of RR were estimated. The 95 % confidence intervals for RR remained within the interval of a relative ±40 % variation for all comparisons that involved alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and denosumab. In contrast, the comparisons involving zoledronate satisfied a post hoc margin up to ±67 %. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that most of these anti-reabsorptive drugs (namely, alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and denosumab) are equivalent according to reasonable equivalence margins.

Adsorption on apatitic calcium phosphates for drug delivery: interaction with bisphosphonate molecules.

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are well established as an important class of drugs for the treatment and prevention of several bone disorders including osteoporosis. This work investigated the interaction of two bisphosphonates, risedronate and tiludronate, with several apatitic supports, a well-crystallised hydroxyapatite (HA) and nanocrystalline apatites with varying maturation times, chemical composition and surface characteristics. The purpose was to fully understand the adsorption mechanism and desorption process, by the evaluation of the effect of several physicochemical parameters (temperature, pH and concentration of calcium and phosphate ions). Whatever the nature of the BP and the structure and composition of the apatite, the adsorption of such anti-resorptive agents can be well described as an ion exchange-reaction between phosphates species on the apatitic surface and BP molecules in solution. However, the parameters of adsorption can vary depending on the physicochemical conditions of the adsorption reaction. In addition, the structure and composition of the apatitic surface also influence the adsorption properties. Finally, BPs molecules are slowly released from apatitic supports, because most of the adsorbed molecules are irreversibly bound and not spontaneously released by dilution or simple washing. Moreover, similar to their adsorption, the release of bisphosphonates is strongly affected not only by the chemical properties of the molecule, but also by the chemical and structural characteristics of the apatitic substrates. The understanding of the adsorption and release processes provides fundamental tools for the development of drug delivery systems using apatite materials.

Bisphosphonate Liposomes for Cobalt and Strontium Decorporation?

ABSTRACT: During a nuclear/radiological incident or an accident involving internal intakes with radioactive cobalt or strontium, the recommended treatments, consisting of the administration of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid for 60 Co and calcium gluconate for 90 Sr, are of low specificity, and their effectiveness can be enhanced. In this manuscript, a liposomal formulation was developed to deliver potential chelating agents to the main retention organs of both radionuclides. A bisphosphonate, etidronate, has been selected as a possible candidate due to its satisfying decorporation activity for uranium, bone tropism, and potential affinity with cobalt. Pre-clinical studies have been carried out on rats using radionuclide contamination and treatment administration by the intravenous route. The effectiveness of free or liposomal etidronate was evaluated, with an administration at 30 min, 48 h post-contamination with 60 Co. Regarding 85 Sr, a more extended experiment with etidronate liposomes was performed over 6 d. The results were compared to those performed with reference treatments, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid for cobalt and calcium gluconate for strontium. Unexpected results were found for the reference treatments that were significantly less effective than previously reported or showed no effectiveness. Free etidronate revealed no significant efficacy after 48 h, but the liposomal form suggested an interaction with radionuclides, not sufficient to change the biokinetics. This study emphasizes the need for early treatment administration and further research to provide a more effective medical countermeasure.

(188)Re-HEDP combined with capecitabine in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with bone metastases: a phase I safety and toxicity study.

PURPOSE: (188)Re-HEDP is indicated for the treatment of pain in patients with painful osteoblastic bone metastases, including hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. Efficacy may be improved by adding chemotherapy to the treatment regimen as a radiation sensitizer. The combination of (188)Re-HEDP and capecitabine (Xeloda(R)) was tested in a clinical phase I study. METHODS: Patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer were treated with capecitabine for 14 days (oral twice daily in a dose escalation regimen with steps of 1/3 of 2,500 mg/m(2) per day in cohorts of three to six patients, depending on toxicity). Two days later patients were treated with 37 MBq/kg (188)Re-HEDP as an intravenous injection. Six hours after treatment post-therapy scintigraphy was performed. Urine was collected for 8 h post-injection. Follow-up was at least 8 weeks. The primary end-point was to establish the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of capecitabine when combined with (188)Re-HEDP. Secondary end-points included the effect of capecitabine on the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of (188)Re-HEDP. RESULTS: Three patients were treated in the first and second cohorts, each without unacceptable toxicity. One of six patients in the highest cohort experienced unacceptable toxicity (grade 4 thrombopaenia). The MTD proved to be the maximum dose of 2,500 mg/m(2) per day capecitabine. No unexpected toxicity occurred. Capecitabine had no effect on uptake or excretion of (188)Re-HEDP. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine may be safely used in combination with (188)Re-HEDP in a dose of 2,500 mg/m(2) per day and 37 MBq/kg, respectively. Efficacy will be further studied in a phase II study using these dosages.

Risedronate on two consecutive days per month.

Risedronate, an orally administered pyridinal bisphosphonate, is effective in the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Efforts to optimize patient adherence and persistence with, and hence the effectiveness of, therapy have led to the development of a 75 mg tablet to be taken on two consecutive days each month (2CDM). After 1 year of treatment, risedronate 75 mg 2CDM was noninferior to risedronate 5 mg once daily in improving lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in an ongoing (2-year) randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multinational trial in 1229 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Mean percentage increases in BMD from baseline at 12 months were 3.4% and 3.6% in the 75 mg 2CDM and 5 mg once-daily groups; the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the treatment difference (5 mg once daily - 75 mg 2CDM; -0.19%, 0.62%) did not exceed the predefined noninferiority margin (1.5%). In general, improvements in hip BMD and reductions in bone turnover markers with the 75 mg 2CDM regimen were not significantly different from those with the 5 mg once-daily regimen; there was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of new vertebral fractures at 12 months. The tolerability profile (including the incidence of upper gastrointestinal tract adverse events) of risedronate 75 mg 2CDM in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis was similar to that of risedronate 5 mg once daily.

Differences in persistence, safety and efficacy of generic and original branded once weekly bisphosphonates in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: 1-year results of a retrospective patient chart review analysis.

The objective of this study was to compare the changes on bone mineral density, and the effects on persistence and adverse events in patients treated for postmenopausal osteoporosis with generic alendronate or with branded alendronate (Fosamax®) or branded risedronate (Actonel®) once weekly. In this retrospective patient chart analysis, we reviewed the 1-year observational treatment results for 186 women (ITT population) with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Patients from our outpatient department, who had started with once-weekly bisphosphonate therapy between 36 and at least 12 months before this chart review, were included in this comparative three-arm study according to their treatment: A, Generic Alendonate 70 mg products; B, Branded Alendronate (Fosamax®) 70 mg once weekly and C, Branded Risedronate (Actonel®) 35 mg once weekly. All patients received basic therapy with 1,200 mg calcium and 800 IU vitamin D per day. Patient's bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine and total hip was below −2.5 T-score, and they were with or without prevalent vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Data analysis regarding the 186 patients shows an average increase in LS-BMD after 12 months of 2.8, 5.2 and 4.8% for the groups A, B and C, respectively. The respective mean changes at total hip were 1.5, 2.9, and 3.1%. At both sites, the mean increases in BMD were not different between the two groups receiving branded bisphosphonates (B, C) but for both were significantly higher than for the group treated with generic alendronate (A). At 12 months, 68% of group A, 84% of group B and 94% of group C were still on bisphosphonate therapy. The persistence of patients treated with generic alendronate was significantly lower as compared to each of the two with branded bisphosphonate-treated groups. The total numbers of patients reporting gastrointestinal adverse events were 32, 15 and 9 for group A, group B, and group C, respectively. Significantly lower increases of lumbar spine and total hip BMD with generic alendronate once weekly as compared to the two branded bisphosphonate originals (Fosamax®, Actonel®) were observed. The reasons for the 40­50% lower BMD increase rates when using the generic compounds are not known yet. At least in part the lower efficacy can be explained by a significantly lower degree of persistence with generic alendronate, which could be related to a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events. Other reasons could be lower bioavailability or potency of generic alendronate.

Visualizing mineral binding and uptake of bisphosphonate by osteoclasts and non-resorbing cells.

Bisphosphonates (BPs) target bone due to their high affinity for calcium ions. During osteoclastic resorption, these drugs are released from the acidified bone surface and taken up by osteoclasts, where they act by inhibiting the prenylation of small GTPases essential for osteoclast function. However, it remains unclear exactly how osteoclasts internalise BPs from bone and whether other cells in the bone microenvironment can also take up BPs from the bone surface. We have investigated this using a novel fluorescently-labelled alendronate analogue (FL-ALN), and by examining changes in protein prenylation following treatment of cells with risedronate (RIS). Confocal microscopic analysis showed that FL-ALN was efficiently internalised from solution or from the surface of dentine by resorbing osteoclasts into intracellular vesicles. Accordingly, unprenylated Rap1A accumulated to the same extent whether osteoclasts were cultured on RIS-coated dentine or with RIS in solution. By contrast, J774 macrophages internalised FL-ALN and RIS from solution, but took up comparatively little from dentine, due to their inability to resorb the mineral. Calvarial osteoblasts and MCF-7 tumour cells internalised even less FL-ALN and RIS, both from solution and from the surface of dentine. Accordingly, the viability of J774 and MCF-7 cells was drastically reduced when cultured with RIS in solution, but not when cultured on dentine pre-coated with RIS. However, when J774 macrophages were co-cultured with rabbit osteoclasts, J774 cells that were adjacent to resorbing osteoclasts frequently internalised more FL-ALN than J774 cells more distant from osteoclasts. This was possibly a result of increased availability of BP to these J774 cells due to transcytosis through osteoclasts, since FL-ALN partially co-localised with trancytosed, resorbed matrix protein within osteoclasts. In addition, J774 cells occupying resorption pits internalised more FL-ALN than those on unresorbed surfaces. These data demonstrate that osteoclasts are able to take up large amounts of BP, due to their ability to release the BP from the dentine surface during resorption. By contrast, non-resorbing cells take up only small amounts of BP that becomes available due to natural desorption from the dentine surface. However, BP uptake by non-resorbing cells can be increased when cultured in the presence of resorbing osteoclasts.

Esophageal transit and in vivo disintegration of branded risedronate sodium tablets and two generic formulations of alendronic acid tablets: a single-center, single-blind, six-period crossover study in healthy female subjects.

BACKGROUND: Delayed esophageal transit or disintegration of oral bisphosphonate tablets before they enter the stomach may be of concern with respect to iatrogenic complications among patients receiving longterm treatment. Different formulations of generic bisphosphonate tablets meeting regulatory requirements may have substantial differences in pharmaceutical attributes from the branded product that may result in different characteristics during esophageal transit. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate and compare esophageal transit times and in vivo disintegration of 3 bisphosphonate formulations, one branded and the others generic, that are commercially available in Canada and the United Kingdom. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, singleblind, 6-period crossover study in healthy postmenopausal women aged >50 years. Each subject received a single oral dose of a branded risedronate sodium 35-mg tablet and 2 generic formulations of alendronic acid 70-mg tablets (Novopharm Limited, Toronto, Canada, and Teva UK Limited, Morley, United Kingdom) in both the erect and semisupine (45 degrees ) positions. Although the products are labeled to be taken in the erect position, the semisupine position was included to simulate dosing in bedridden patients. Subjects took tablets with 30 mL of water in the morning after an overnight fast. The tablets were radiolabeled with technetium-99m ion-exchange resins to enable visualization and measurement of esophageal transit time and disintegration using a gamma camera. Dynamic scintigraphic images were obtained for a total of 10 minutes: 2 images per second for the first 30 seconds and 1 image every 15 seconds for 9.5 minutes. This was a mechanistic study and tolerability was not assessed. RESULTS: The study was conducted in 20 healthy white female subjects with a mean age of 62 years (range, 51-77 years). The effect of body position was statistically significant (P = 0.043), with the estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.74 indicating longer transit time in the semisupine position relative to the erect position. There was a statistically significant difference in transit time among the 3 types of tablets (P = 0.007), with the Novopharm tablet (HR = 0.59; P < 0.001) and Teva tablet (HR = 0.71; P = 0.042) having longer transit times compared with the risedronate tablet. In 4 instances, the Novopharm tablet disintegrated and dispersed in the esophagus, once in the erect position and 3 times in the semisupine position. CONCLUSIONS: In these healthy female subjects, esophageal transit was delayed when the tablets were given in the semisupine position. The branded risedronate tablet had a significantly faster transit time than the 2 generic formulations of alendronate tested.

Bone lesion absorbed dose profiles in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with molecular radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to calculate the range of absorbed doses that could potentially be delivered by a variety of radiopharmaceuticals and typical fixed administered activities used for bone pain palliation in a cohort of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The methodology for the extrapolation of the biodistribution, pharmacokinetics and absorbed doses from a given to an alternative radiopharmaceutical is presented. METHODS: Sequential single photon emission CT images from 22 patients treated with 5 GBq of 186Re-HEDP were used to extrapolate the time-activity curves for various radiopharmaceuticals. Cumulated activity distributions for the delivered and extrapolated treatment plans were converted into absorbed dose distributions using the convolution dosimetry method. The lesion absorbed doses obtained for the different treatments were compared using the patient population distributions and cumulative dose-volume histograms. RESULTS: The median lesion absorbed doses across the patient cohort ranged from 2.7 Gy (range: 0.6-11.8 Gy) for 1100 MBq of 166Ho-DOTMP to 21.8 Gy (range: 4.5-117.6 Gy) for 150 MBq of 89Sr-dichloride. 32P-Na3PO4, 153Sm-EDTMP, 166Ho-DOTMP, 177Lu-EDTMP and 188Re-HEDP would have delivered 41, 32, 85, 20 and 64% lower absorbed doses, for the typical administered activities as compared to 186Re-HEDP, respectively, whilst 89Sr-dichloride would have delivered 25% higher absorbed doses. CONCLUSION: For the patient cohort studied, a wide range of absorbed doses would have been delivered for typical administration protocols in mCRPC. The methodology presented has potential use for emerging theragnostic agents. Advances in knowledge: The same patient cohort can receive a range of lesion absorbed doses from typical molecular radiotherapy treatments for patients with metastatic prostate cancer, highlighting the need to establish absorbed dose response relationships and to treat patients according to absorbed dose instead of using fixed administered activities.

Etidronate for Prevention of Ectopic Mineralization in Patients With Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum.

BACKGROUND: In pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE), low pyrophosphate levels may cause ectopic mineralization, leading to skin changes, visual impairment, and peripheral arterial disease. OBJECTIVES: The authors hypothesized that etidronate, a pyrophosphate analog, might reduce ectopic mineralization in PXE. METHODS: In the Treatment of Ectopic Mineralization in Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum trial, adults with PXE and leg arterial calcifications (n = 74) were randomly assigned to etidronate or placebo (cyclical 20 mg/kg for 2 weeks every 12 weeks). The primary outcome was ectopic mineralization, quantified with 18fluoride positron emission tomography scans as femoral arterial wall target-to-background ratios (TBRfemoral). Secondary outcomes were computed tomography arterial calcification and ophthalmological changes. Safety outcomes were bone density, serum calcium, and phosphate. RESULTS: During 12 months of follow-up, the TBRfemoral increased 6% (interquartile range [IQR]: -12% to 25%) in the etidronate group and 7% (IQR: -9% to 32%) in the placebo group (p = 0.465). Arterial calcification decreased 4% (IQR: -11% to 7%) in the etidronate group and increased 8% (IQR: -1% to 20%) in the placebo group (p = 0.001). Etidronate treatment was associated with significantly fewer subretinal neovascularization events (1 vs. 9, p = 0.007). Bone density decreased 4% ± 12% in the etidronate group and 6% ± 9% in the placebo group (p = 0.374). Hypocalcemia (<2.20 mmol/l) occurred in 3 versus 1 patient (8.1% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.304). Eighteen patients (48.6%) treated with etidronate, compared with 0 patients treated with placebo (p < 0.001), experienced hyperphosphatemia (>1.5 mmol/l) and recovered spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PXE, etidronate reduced arterial calcification and subretinal neovascularization events but did not lower femoral 18fluoride sodium positron emission tomography activity compared with placebo, without important safety issues. (Treatment of Ectopic Mineralization in Pseudoxanthoma elasticum; NTR5180).

Effect of administration site in the gastrointestinal tract on bioavailability of poorly absorbed drugs taken after a meal.

Food-drug interactions may reduce the bioavailability of drugs taken after meals (negative food effect). In order to develop pharmaceutical technologies that overcome this problem, the effect of administration site within the gastrointestinal tract on the bioavailability of several model drugs was examined in rats. Bioavailability after oral administration to fed animals was one-fifth to one-tenth of that in the fasted animals because of interactions between drugs and large amounts of food components remaining in the stomach. This strong negative food effect was reduced when drugs were administered directly into any site of the small intestine. Bioavailability was maximized when the drug administration site was the middle small intestine. On the other hand, intracolonic administration did not result in the reduction of the negative food effect. Site-specific drug delivery to the middle small intestine could be a useful approach for reducing the negative food effect on drug absorption with maximized bioavailability.

Development of bone seeker radiopharmaceuticals by Scandium-47 and estimation of human absorbed dose.

In this study labeling EDTMP (ethylenediamine tetra(methylene phosphonic acid)) and HEDP (Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic Acid) as the carrier ligands with Scandium-47 were investigated. The biokinetics of the bone seeking of labeled ligands with Scandium-47 were assessed by measuring the skeletal absorbed dose and then the mice data extrapolated to human absorbed dose and compared with the 186/188Rhenium-HEDP, 153Samarium-EDTMP dosimetry data estimated by other researchers. Because the availability of 47Sc was limited we performed some preliminary studies using 46Sc.

Esophageal transit of the weekly film-coated risedronate (Actonel) placebo tablet in subjects with Kyphosis.

Risedronate sodium is a pyridinyl bisphosphonate of proven effectiveness for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and Paget's disease of the bone. The aim of this study was to compare the esophageal transit and gastric emptying of the placebo film-coated risedronate tablet when taken with 50 or 120 mL of water in subjects with Kyphosis. A total of 23 patients with radiologically documented osteoporosis participated in a single-center, open-label, crossover gamma scintigraphy study. The mean esophageal transit times were 15.6 s (50 mL) and 12.0 s (120 mL) and the mean gastric emptying half-times were 20.5 min (50 mL) and 14.3 min (120 mL). There was no relationship between the degree of Kyphosis measured from lateral standing radiographs and the esophageal transit time. This study demonstrated that even when taken with a minimal volume of water the esophageal transit and gastric emptying of the film-coated 35 mg weekly risedronate placebo tablet was similar in kyphotic subjects to previously obtained results from healthy control subjects.

Bisphosphonates inhibit angiogenesis in vitro and testosterone-stimulated vascular regrowth in the ventral prostate in castrated rats.

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are used currently in the treatment of patients with bone metastases because these compounds inhibit bone resorption. We examined here the effects of BPs on inhibition of endothelial cell functions in vitro and in vivo. Treatment of endothelial cells with BPs (clodronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronic acid) reduced proliferation, induced apoptosis, and decreased capillary-like tube formation in vitro. Quantification of blood vessels in bone biopsy specimens from patients with Paget's disease before and after clodronate treatment showed a 40% reduction of the vascularization after BP treatment. However, such a decreased vascularity could be secondary to a reduction of bone resorption. Therefore, the tissue distribution of [14C]BPs in male rats was examined to develop an angiogenesis model in a noncalcified tissue where BPs could accumulate. [14C]BPs (zoledronic acid, ibandronate, and clodronate) not only accumulated in bone but also transiently accumulated in the prostate. The effects of BPs on testosterone-induced revascularization of the prostate gland in castrated rats were then studied. Testosterone in combination with ibandronate or zoledronic acid induced a 17-35% reduction of the prostate weight compared with castrated rats treated with testosterone alone. Blood vessel immunostaining on prostate tissue sections revealed that both ibandronate and zoledronic acid induced a 50% reduction of the revascularization of the prostate gland. Moreover, zoledronic acid did not alter testosterone-induced activity of a luciferase gene reporter construct transfected in androgen-dependent prostatic cells, indicating that this BP did not directly interfere with testosterone. In conclusion, BPs have in vivo antiangiogenic properties, which could be of relevance to improve therapy and prevention of bone metastasis. In addition, our results extend the potential clinical use of BPs to patients with early prostate cancer.

Drug composition matters: the influence of carrier concentration on the radiochemical purity, hydroxyapatite affinity and in-vivo bone accumulation of the therapeutic radiopharmaceutical 188Rhenium-HEDP.

INTRODUCTION: (188)Rhenium-HEDP is an effective bone-targeting therapeutic radiopharmaceutical, for treatment of osteoblastic bone metastases. It is known that the presence of carrier (non-radioactive rhenium as ammonium perrhenate) in the reaction mixture during labeling is a prerequisite for adequate bone affinity, but little is known about the optimal carrier concentration. METHODS: We investigated the influence of carrier concentration in the formulation on the radiochemical purity, in-vitro hydroxyapatite affinity and the in-vivo bone accumulation of (188)Rhenium-HEDP in mice. RESULTS: The carrier concentration influenced hydroxyapatite binding in-vitro as well as bone accumulation in-vivo. Variation in hydroxyapatite binding with various carrier concentrations seemed to be mainly driven by variation in radiochemical purity. The in-vivo bone accumulation appeared to be more complex: satisfactory radiochemical purity and hydroxyapatite affinity did not necessarily predict acceptable bio-distribution of (188)Rhenium-HEDP. CONCLUSIONS: For development of new bisphosphonate-based radiopharmaceuticals for clinical use, human administration should not be performed without previous animal bio-distribution experiments. Furthermore, our clinical formulation of (188)Rhenium-HEDP, containing 10 µmol carrier, showed excellent bone accumulation that was comparable to other bisphosphonate-based radiopharmaceuticals, with no apparent uptake in other organs. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Radiochemical purity and in-vitro hydroxyapatite binding are not necessarily predictive of bone accumulation of (188)Rhenium-HEDP in-vivo. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: The formulation for (188)Rhenium-HEDP as developed by us for clinical use exhibits excellent bone uptake and variation in carrier concentration during preparation of this radiopharmaceutical should be avoided.

Retention of etidronate in human, dog, and rat.

The retention of radioactivity in human, rat, and dog following a single injected dose of radiolabeled etidronate disodium (EHDP) is shown to follow power-law decay curves with similar slopes for times up to 4, 60, and 80 days, respectively. During this period retention declines with time according to a weak inverse power of the time since dosing, with an exponent ranging from -0.05 (dog) to -0.09 (human and rat). Direct analyses of dog bones either 90 days after a single dose or 365 days after cessation of chronic dosing indicate a more rapid bone clearance of EHDP than predicted by the initial power law. Direct skeletal analysis also shows a more rapid loss of radioactivity in the rat between 60 and 365 days, indicative of either a second power law or a terminal exponential phase in the retention function occurring after 60 days. These data are used to estimate the minimum and maximum amounts of drug that would remain in the body following long-term treatment in humans. For the intermittent cyclic EHDP treatment (ICT) regimen for osteoporosis (repeated cycles of 14 daily doses of 400 mg orally followed by 76 days drug free), the projected retention of EHDP after 3 years of treatment is 25-50 times the daily absorbed dose. Thus, for a 60 kg woman with a daily absorbed dose of 12 mg, the retained mass of EHDP would be about 300-600 mg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Rhenium-188(Sn)HEDP for treatment of osseous metastases.

UNLABELLED: Rhenium-188 (tin) hydroxyethylidine diphosphonate [188Re(Sn)HEDP] is a new radiopharmaceutical that localizes in skeletal metastases and emits beta particles that may be therapeutically beneficial. METHODS: It was evaluated by in vitro and in vivo testing in the laboratory, in animals and in humans using 188Re from a variety of sources. It may be produced by a desk-top method developed previously for 186Re(Sn)HEDP using 188Re produced through neutron irradiation of either enriched 187Re or naturally occurring rhenium targets or the use of a 188W/188Re generator. RESULTS: So long as the mass of rhenium in the 188Re-perrhenate to be processed into 188Re(Sn)HEDP is at least 100 microg, satisfactory radiochemical yields and purity may be obtained by all methods. The 188Re(Sn)HEDP has biodistribution and radiation dosimetry characteristics that are similar to those noted previously for 186Re(Sn)HEDP and appears to result in similar benefits and toxicities in patients with skeletal metastases. External radiation exposure monitoring indicates that, only 4 hr after a therapeutic administration of 1110 MBq (30 mCi) of 188Re(Sn)HEDP, average exposure rates at 1 meter from the patient would be only 0.5 mR/hr. CONCLUSION: Same-day, on-demand, outpatient therapy of disseminated skeletal metastases appears to be feasible with 188Re(Sn)HEDP.

Dosimetry of 188Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate in human prostate cancer skeletal metastases.

UNLABELLED: 188Re-Hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate ((188)Re-HEDP) was used in previous studies for the palliative treatment of metastatic bone pain. However, the kinetic and radiation-absorbed doses have not been well documented. Therefore, the aim of this study was to gather dosimetric data for (188)Re-HEDP. METHODS: Thirteen prostate cancer patients with skeletal involvement were treated with 2,700-3,459 MBq (mean dose, 3,120 MBq) (188)Re-HEDP. Patients underwent whole-body scans 3, 20, and 28 h after therapy. The effective half-life, residence time, and radiation-absorbed dose values were calculated for the whole body, bone marrow, kidneys, and bladder as well as for 29 bone metastases. The urinary excretion rate was determined in 6 urine samples of each patient collected over 48 h at 8-h intervals beginning immediately after the administration of (188)Re-HEDP. After injection of (188)Re-HEDP, blood samples were taken weekly for 6 wk, and platelet and leukocyte counts were performed. RESULTS: The mean effective half-life was 15.9 +/- 3.5 h in bone metastases, 10.9 +/- 2.1 h in the bone marrow, 11.6 +/- 2.1 h in the whole body, 12.7 +/- 2.2 h in the kidneys, and 7.7 +/- 3.4 h in the bladder. The following radiation-absorbed doses were calculated: 3.83 +/- 2.01 mGy/MBq for bone metastases, 0.61 +/- 0.21 mGy/MBq for the bone marrow, 0.07 +/- 0.02 mGy/MBq for the whole body, 0.71 +/- 0.22 mGy/MBq for the kidneys, and 0.99 +/- 0.18 mGy/MBq for the bladder. (188)Re-HEDP showed a rapid urinary excretion within the first 8 h after therapy, with 41% of the (188)Re-HEDP administered being excreted. Forty-eight hours after therapy, the excretion rate was 60% +/- 12%. Only 1 patient showed a decrease of platelet count below 100 x 10(9) counts/L. None of the patients presented with a decrease of leukocyte count below 3.0 x 10(9) counts/L. CONCLUSION: (188)Re-HEDP is an effective radiopharmaceutical used in the palliative treatment of metastatic bone pain. The radiation-absorbed dose is acceptable for bone pain palliation with low doses for the normal bone marrow and the whole body.

Skeletal uptake and soft-tissue retention of 186Re-HEDP and 153Sm-EDTMP in patients with metastatic bone disease.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to introduce a new quantification method for 153Sm-ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonate (EDTMP) and 186Re-(tin)1,1-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) to separately measure bone uptake and soft-tissue retention of these radiopharmaceuticals. METHODS: Studies were performed on 23 men and 6 women undergoing radionuclide therapy for palliation of bone pain. Whole-body images were acquired at 3 min, 3-4 h, and 24-72 h after injection of 1,295 MBq 186Re-HEDP and 37 MBq 153Sm-EDTMP per kilogram of body weight. The activities for whole body, urinary bladder, and both thighs, as representative of soft tissue, were measured by region-of-interest technique. A background region of interest adjacent to the head was used to correct for bremsstrahlung. Bone uptake was calculated as initial whole-body activity minus urinary excretion and remaining soft-tissue activity. RESULTS: For 186Re-HEDP (n = 11) the mean bone uptake at 3 h after injection was 13.7% +/- 8.6% of initial whole-body activity. The remaining soft-tissue activity was 49.4% +/- 16.9%, and urinary excretion was 36.9% +/- 14.4%. At 24 h after injection, bone uptake reached a value of 21.8% +/- 9.0%. Urinary excretion increased to 65.3% +/- 12.8% according to a decreasing soft-tissue remainder activity of 12.8% +/- 5.4%. The corresponding results for 153Sm-EDTMP (n = 18) at 3 h after injection were 29.2% +/- 15.5% for bone uptake, 32.3% +/- 12.9% for urinary excretion, and 38.4% +/- 14.5% for soft tissue. At 24 h after injection, we calculated values of 47.7% +/- 11.2% for bone uptake, 39.5% +/- 13.8% for urinary excretion, and 12.7% +/- 4.7% for soft tissue. CONCLUSION: Bone uptake and soft-tissue retention for both 186Re-HEDP and 153Sm-EDTMP as obtained in this study agree well with the conventional 24-h whole-body retention measurements for these tracers. However, by this new scintigraphic quantification method, bone uptake and soft-tissue retention can be calculated separately, thus providing more detailed kinetic data and potentially improving the dosimetry of these radiopharmaceuticals in, for example, assessment of radiation dosage to bone and bone marrow.