Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 509
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 160(2): 485-491, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33276987

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate representation trends of historically underrepresented minority (URM) groups in gynecologic oncology fellowships in the United States using a nationwide database collected by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). METHODS: Data on self-reported ethnicity/race of filled residency positions was collected from ACGME Database Books across three academic years from 2016 to 2019. Primary chi-square analysis compared URM representation in gynecologic oncology to obstetrics and gynecology, other surgical specialties, and other medical specialties. Secondary analysis examined representation of two URM subgroups: 1) Asian/Pacific Islander, and 2) Hispanic, Black, Native American, Other (HBNO), across specialty groups. RESULTS: A total of 528 gynecologic oncology positions, 12,559 obstetrics and gynecology positions, 52,733 other surgical positions, and 240,690 other medical positions from ACGME accredited medical specialties were included in analysis. Primary comparative analysis showed a statistically significant lower proportion (P < 0.05) of URM trainees in gynecologic oncology in comparison to each of obstetrics and gynecology, other surgical fields, and other medical fields. Secondary analysis also demonstrated a significantly lower proportion (P < 0.05) of HBNO physicians in gynecologic oncology in comparison to obstetrics and gynecology, as well as all other medical and surgical specialties. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the disparities in URM representation, especially those who identify as HBNO, in gynecologic oncology fellowship training in comparison to obstetrics and gynecology as well as other medical and surgical fields. Improvements to the current recruitment and selection practices in gynecologic oncology fellowships in the United States are necessary in order to ensure a diverse and representative workforce.


Asunto(s)
Diversidad Cultural , Ginecología/tendencias , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Oncología Médica/tendencias , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Acreditación/estadística & datos numéricos , Acreditación/tendencias , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología/educación , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Oncología Médica/educación , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
2.
Anesth Analg ; 132(5): 1457-1464, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33438967

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A temporary decrease in anesthesiology residency graduates that occurred around the turn of the millennium may have workforce implications. The aims of this study are to describe, between 2005 and 2015, (1) demographic changes in the workforce of physicians trained as anesthesiologists; (2) national and state densities of these physicians, as well as temporal changes in the densities; and (3) retention of medical licenses by mid- and later-career anesthesiologists. METHODS: Using records from the American Board of Anesthesiology and state medical and osteopathic boards, the numbers of licensed physicians aged 30-59 years who had completed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited anesthesiology residency training were calculated cross-sectionally for 2005, 2010, and 2015. Demographic trends were then described. Census data were used to calculate national and state densities of licensed physicians. Individual longitudinal data were used to describe retention of medical licenses among older physicians. RESULTS: The number of licensed physicians trained as anesthesiologists aged 30-59 years increased from 32,644 in 2005 to 36,543 in 2010 and 36,624 in 2015, representing a national density of 1.10, 1.18, and 1.14 per 10,000 population in those years, respectively. The density of anesthesiologists among states ranged from 0.37 to 3.10 per 10,000 population. The age distribution differed across the years. For example, anesthesiologists aged 40-49 years predominated in 2005 (47%), but by 2015, only 31% of anesthesiologists were aged 40-49 years. The proportion of female anesthesiologists grew from 22% in 2005, to 24% in 2010, and to 28% in 2015, particularly among early-career anesthesiologists. For anesthesiologists with licenses in 2005, the number who still had active licenses in 2015 decreased by 9.6% for those aged 45-49 years, by 14.1% for those aged 50-54 years, and by 19.7% for those aged 55-59 years. CONCLUSIONS: The temporary decrease in anesthesiology residency graduates around the turn of the 21st century decreased the proportion of anesthesiologists who were midcareer as of 2015. This may affect the future availability of senior leaders as well as the future overall workforce in the specialty as older anesthesiologists retire. National efforts to plan for workforce needs should recognize the geographical variability in the distribution of anesthesiologists.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/tendencias , Anestesiólogos/tendencias , Anestesiología/tendencias , Certificación/tendencias , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Licencia Médica/tendencias , Adulto , Anestesiólogos/educación , Anestesiólogos/provisión & distribución , Anestesiología/educación , Selección de Profesión , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
3.
BMC Med Educ ; 20(1): 216, 2020 Jul 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32652999

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study targeted the association of program characteristics of 203 Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs in the United States (US) reported by the Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE) in their 2017 Annual Accreditation Report (AAR) with measures of core faculty research volume. The association of institutional, program, and faculty characteristics of an institution with core faculty research volume was investigated. METHODS: This observational study analyzed data provided in the AAR about program research volume. Predictor variables included institutional, program and faculty characteristics. Research volume was measured as a ratio of 1) number of peer-reviewed publications, 2) National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, and 3) faculty with grants, per number of core faculty. Research volume was stratified by quartiles and analyzed using logistic regression analyses. The highest 25% were analyzed against the lowest 75%. RESULTS: In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, research Carnegie classification was positively associated with NIH funding (OR = 4.04; 95% CI = 1.92, 8.48) and number of peer reviewed publications (OR = 7.63; 95% CI = 3.39, 17.14). Square footage of research space was positively associated with number of peer reviewed publications (OR = 4.58; 95% CI = 2.08, 10.11). Private status was negatively associated with NIH funding (OR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.17, 0.83) and faculty holding grants (OR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.19, 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence that research culture (e.g., research Carnegie status and dedicated research space) is related to research productivity in DPT programs in the US. Private status was indicative of a non-research intensive environment, which may be reflective of a current trend of small, non-research based private institutions initiating DPT programs.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/tendencias , Revisión de la Investigación por Pares/tendencias , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/educación , Humanos , Estados Unidos
4.
Dig Dis Sci ; 64(5): 1074-1078, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30863954

RESUMEN

GOAL: To assess publicly available content derived from official websites of accredited gastroenterology fellowship programs, specifically evaluating data pertinent to prospective applicants. BACKGROUND: The Internet provides access to key information for applicants applying to gastroenterology fellowship, particularly as competition drives applicants to apply to a large number of programs. Thus, it is important for fellowship program websites to be up to date and contain accurate and pertinent information. METHODS: Twenty-nine variables, determined as important website content on the basis of prior published website analyses and from surveys of preferences, were extracted from the relevant websites of all accredited gastroenterology fellowships in the USA. Results were binary-i.e., a website either contained or did not contain each item. RESULTS: A total of 178 websites were evaluated. The mean number of online content items was 14.1(± 3.2 SD) out of a possible 29 (47.1%). Program coordinator contact information, application information, and the number of current fellows were accessible on > 80% of websites. In contrast, the typical number and types of procedures performed by fellows and number of hospitals covered by fellows on call were found on < 10% of websites. Analysis revealed that 23.2% of lifestyle, 48.3% of training, and 59.6% of program variables were met. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenterology fellowship websites lacked important content. Websites had a lower mean percentage of lifestyle content compared to training and program-related items. An organized website containing relevant information may not only attract qualified applicants but also avert unnecessary email inquiries and inappropriate applications. This study may provide guidance to gastroenterology fellowship programs seeking to improve their websites for applicants.


Asunto(s)
Becas/normas , Gastroenterología/educación , Gastroenterología/normas , Internet/normas , Internado y Residencia/normas , Acreditación/tendencias , Becas/tendencias , Gastroenterología/tendencias , Humanos , Internet/tendencias , Internado y Residencia/tendencias
5.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 33(3): 604-620, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30503334

RESUMEN

Despite women accounting for nearly half of all U.S. medical school graduates, this balanced representation is lacking in the cardiovascular specialties. To explore this question further, gender-based trends in the selection of cardiovascular subspecialty fellowship training were investigated among three core specialties: anesthesiology, medicine, and surgery. Using enrollment and workforce data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), and the Journal of the American Medical Association Annual Report on Graduate Medical Education, trends in cardiovascular fellowship selection among women were examined over a 10-year period (2007-2017). An attempt was also made to better understand barriers that might contribute to any discrepancies, as well as factors that might influence women's choices of cardiovascular specialties over other fields.


Asunto(s)
Anestesiología/tendencias , Cardiología/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/tendencias , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Factores Sexuales , Acreditación/tendencias , Anestesiología/educación , Cardiología/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/educación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
6.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 25(5): 423-430, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31348156

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Local health departments (LHDs) are increasingly using national standards to meet the challenges presented by the complex environments in which these agencies operate. Local boards of health (LBoHs) might play an instrumental role in improving LHDs' engagement in activities to meet these standards. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of LBoH performance of governance functions on LHDs having a current (completed within 5 years) community health assessment (CHA), community health improvement plan (CHIP), strategic plan, and level of engagement in the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) accreditation program. METHODS: Binary and multinomial logistic regression models were used to analyze linked data from 329 LHDs participating in both the 2015 Local Board of Health Survey and the 2016 National Profile of LHDs Survey. RESULTS: Higher performance of LBoH governance functions, measured by an overall scale of LBoH taxonomy consisting of 60 items, had a significant positive effect on LHDs having completed CHA (P < .001), CHIP (P = .01), and strategic plan (P < .001). LHDs operating in communities with a higher score on the overall scale of LBoH taxonomy had significantly higher odds (P = .03) of having higher level of participation in the PHAB national voluntary accreditation program-that is, being accredited, having submitted application for accreditation, or being in the e-PHAB system (eg, by submitting a letter of intent). CONCLUSIONS: LBoHs serve as governance bodies for roughly 71% of LHDs and can play a significant role in encouraging LHDs' participation in these practices. That positive influence of LBoHs can be seen more clearly if the complexity and richness of LBoH governance functions and other characteristics are measured appropriately. The study findings suggest that LBoHs are a significant component of the public health system in the United States, having positive influence on LHDs having a CHA, CHIP, strategic plan, and participation in accreditation.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/tendencias , Administración en Salud Pública/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Planificación Estratégica , Consejo Directivo , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Salud Pública/métodos , Salud Pública/tendencias , Administración en Salud Pública/tendencias , Estados Unidos
7.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 25(5): 431-439, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31348157

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Balancing competing imperatives of conserving scarce resources while improving organizational performance and community health, many local health departments (LHDs) have decided to pursue national, voluntary public health accreditation as a guide to improvement, but how to do so in the most efficient way possible remains a question for many. METHODS: This study employed a participatory action research approach in which LHD directors and accreditation coordinators from 7 accredited and 3 late-stage accreditation ready Kentucky LHD jurisdictions participated. Participants organized a set of accreditation deliverables into a chronological sequencing of each site's accreditation readiness process, which was then coded by researchers to identify similarities and differences. RESULTS: All participating jurisdictions had all-hazards emergency operations plans and public health emergency operations plans while none had workforce development plans, quality improvement plans, or performance management plans before launching accreditation readiness activities. Also identified were the number of accreditation deliverables attempted, simultaneously, by each site and the importance of specific deliverables having a singular focus. Sequences of work on specific deliverables by the majority of participants included completing work on the quality improvement plan immediately, followed by the performance management plan, the Community Health Assessment before the Community Health Improvement Plan, and a strategic plan, followed by a workforce development plan. Factors influencing accreditation readiness processes, elements for sustaining processes, and lessons learned throughout the pursuit of accreditation were also provided by participants. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing the impact of staff availability, staff skill sets, training, and available financial resources on the pursuit of accreditation, participants determined that aggregating lessons learned into a flowchart highlighting the interconnectedness of accreditation deliverables could produce a road map for LHDs. Accreditation deliverables could be attempted in a logical, efficient order particularly valuable to small LHDs with limited resources and yet adaptable for those jurisdictions able to devote more resources to the process.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/métodos , Salud Pública/métodos , Acreditación/tendencias , Humanos , Kentucky , Salud Pública/instrumentación , Salud Pública/tendencias , Administración en Salud Pública/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Desarrollo de Personal/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 29(6): 568-575, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30240052

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the third Summer Camp of European Association of Osseointegration (EAO), 40 junior representatives from various European societies and associations were brought together to discuss and explore the following topics in Implant Dentistry in the next 10 years: (I) certification, (II) societies and associations, (III) continuing education, and (IV) innovations. AIMS: The aims of all working groups were to identify and outline the present situation in the area of the selected topic and to propose improvements and innovations to be implemented in the following 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different groups were assigned randomly to one of the four working units. The method to discuss the selected topics was World Cafè. The summaries of four topics were then given to all participants for peer review. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All four groups presented the conclusions and guidelines accordingly: (I) The recognition for Implant Dentistry and accreditation of training programs would lead to an improvement of the quality of care to the benefit of the patients; (II) Dental associations and societies have to continuously improve communication to meet needs of dental students, professionals, and patients (III) European Dental Board should be installed and become responsible for continue dental education; (IV) dental engineering, peri-implant diseases, and digital workflow in dentistry currently have limited tools that do not guarantee predictable results.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/tendencias , Certificación/tendencias , Implantación Dental Endoósea/tendencias , Educación en Odontología/tendencias , Sociedades Odontológicas/tendencias , Terapias en Investigación/tendencias , Acreditación/normas , Implantación Dental Endoósea/métodos , Implantación Dental Endoósea/normas , Implantes Dentales/tendencias , Educación en Odontología/normas , Guías como Asunto/normas , Humanos , Sociedades Odontológicas/organización & administración , Terapias en Investigación/métodos
9.
Emerg Med J ; 35(3): 189-191, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29055891

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) is the governing body responsible for accrediting graduate medical training programme in the USA. The Emergency Medicine Milestones (EM-Milestones) were developed by the ACGME and American Board of Emergency Medicine as a guide and monitoring tool for the knowledge, skills, abilities and experiences to be acquired during training. Alumni surveys have been reported as a valuable resource for training programme to identify areas for improvement; however, there are few studies regarding programme improvement in emergency medicine. We aimed to use the EM-Milestones, adapted as an alumni self-assessment survey, to identify areas for training programme improvement. METHODS: This study was conducted at an urban, academic affiliated, community hospital in New York city with an emergency medicine training programme consisting of 30 residents over 3 years. Alumni of our emergency medicine training programme were sent an EM-Milestones-based self-assessment survey. Participants evaluated their ability in each EM-Milestones subcompetency on a Likert scale. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Response rate was 74% (69/93). Alumni reported achieving the target performance in 5/6 general competencies, with Systems-Based Practice falling below the target performance. The survey further identified 6/23 subcompetencies (Pharmacotherapy, Ultrasound, Wound Management, Patient Safety, Systems-Based Management and Technology) falling below the target performance level. DISCUSSION: Alumni self-evaluation of competence using the EM-Milestones provides valuable information concerning confidence to practice independently; these data, coupled with regular milestone evaluation of existing trainees, can identify problem areas and provide a blueprint for targeted programme improvement.


Asunto(s)
Educación/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/tendencias , Acreditación/normas , Acreditación/tendencias , Educación/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 24 Suppl 3: S95-S97, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29595611

RESUMEN

The Kent County Health Department (KCHD) was accredited by the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) in September 2014. Although Michigan has had a state-level accreditation process for local health departments since the late 1990s, the PHAB accreditation process presented a unique opportunity for KCHD to build on successes achieved through state accreditation and enhance performance in all areas of KCHD programs, services, and operations. PHAB's standards, measures, and peer-review process provided a standardized and structured way to identify meaningful opportunities for improvement and to plan and implement strategies for enhanced performance and established a platform for being recognized nationally as a high-performing local health department. The current case report highlights the way in which KCHD has developed and implemented its strategic plan to guide efforts aimed at addressing gaps identified through the accreditation process and to drive overall improvement within our agency.


Asunto(s)
Gobierno Local , Salud Pública/métodos , Planificación Estratégica , Acreditación/tendencias , Humanos , Michigan , Salud Pública/tendencias
11.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 24 Suppl 3: S3-S9, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29595591

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify the quality improvement (QI) and performance management benefits reported by public health departments as a result of participating in the national, voluntary program for public health accreditation implemented by the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB). DESIGN: We gathered quantitative data via Web-based surveys of all applicant and accredited public health departments when they completed 3 different milestones in the PHAB accreditation process. PARTICIPANTS: Leadership from 324 unique state, local, and tribal public health departments in the United States. RESULTS: Public health departments that have achieved PHAB accreditation reported the following QI and performance management benefits: improved awareness and focus on QI efforts; increased QI training among staff; perceived increases in QI knowledge among staff; implemented new QI strategies; implemented strategies to evaluate effectiveness and quality; used information from QI processes to inform decision making; and perceived achievement of a QI culture. The reported implementation of QI strategies and use of information from QI processes to inform decision making was greater among recently accredited health departments than among health departments that had registered their intent to apply but not yet undergone the PHAB accreditation process. Respondents from health departments that had been accredited for 1 year reported higher levels of staff QI training and perceived increases in QI knowledge than those that were recently accredited. CONCLUSIONS: PHAB accreditation has stimulated QI and performance management activities within public health departments. Health departments that pursue PHAB accreditation are likely to report immediate increases in QI and performance management activities as a result of undergoing the PHAB accreditation process, and these benefits are likely to be reported at a higher level, even 1 year after the accreditation decision.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/normas , Salud Pública/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Acreditación/tendencias , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Salud Pública/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 24 Suppl 3: S25-S34, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29595595

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) accreditation on the delivery of public health services and on participation from other sectors in the delivery of public health services in local public health systems. DESIGN: This study uses a longitudinal repeated measures design to identify differences between a cohort of public health systems containing PHAB-accredited local health departments and a cohort of public health systems containing unaccredited local health departments. It uses data spanning from 2006 to 2016. SETTING: This study examines a cohort of local public health systems that serves large populations and contains unaccredited and PHAB-accredited local health departments. PARTICIPANTS: Data in this study were collected from the directors of health departments that include local public health systems followed in the National Longitudinal Study of Public Health Systems. INTERVENTION: The intervention examined is PHAB accreditation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study focuses on 4 areas: the delivery of core public health services, local health department contribution toward these services, participation in the delivery of these services by other members of the public health system, and public health system makeup. RESULTS: Prior to the advent of accreditation, public health systems containing local health departments that were later accredited by PHAB appear quite similar to their unaccredited peers. Substantial differences between the 2 cohorts appear to manifest themselves after the advent of accreditation. Specifically, the accredited cohort seems to offer a broader array of public health services, involve more partners in the delivery of those services, and enjoy a higher percentage of comprehensive public health systems. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that accreditation may yield significant benefits and may help public health systems develop the public health system capital necessary to protect and promote the public's health.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/métodos , Salud Pública/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Acreditación/tendencias , Humanos , Gobierno Local , Estudios Longitudinales , Salud Pública/instrumentación , Salud Pública/tendencias , Estados Unidos
13.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 24 Suppl 3: S98-S101, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29595612

RESUMEN

The national voluntary accreditation program serves to encourage health agencies to seek departmental accreditation as a mechanism for continuous quality improvement. This study utilizes data from the 2016 Association of State and Territorial Health Officials Profile Survey to examine the perceived benefits of accreditation among state health agencies. Respondents answered questions on topics such as agency structure, workforce, and quality improvement activities. Frequencies and cross tabulations were conducted using IBM SPSS (version 21) statistical software. Results indicate that among accredited agencies, the most commonly endorsed benefits of accreditation include stimulating quality and performance improvement opportunities (95%), strengthening the culture of quality improvement (90%), and stimulating greater collaboration across departments/units within the agency (90%). Policy and practice implications, such as how these data can be used to promote accreditation within health agencies, as well as how accreditation strengthens governmental public health systems, are also discussed.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/normas , Percepción , Salud Pública/métodos , Gobierno Estatal , Acreditación/tendencias , Humanos , Salud Pública/tendencias , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 24 Suppl 3: S102-S108, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29595613

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify the benefits and perceptions among health departments not yet participating in the public health accreditation program implemented by the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB). DESIGN: Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered via Web-based surveys of health departments that had not yet applied for PHAB accreditation (nonapplicants) and health departments that had been accredited for 1 year. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents from 150 nonapplicant health departments and 57 health departments that had been accredited for 1 year. RESULTS: The majority of nonapplicant health departments are reportedly conducting a community health assessment (CHA), community health improvement plan (CHIP), and health department strategic plan-3 documents that are required to be in place before applying for PHAB accreditation. To develop these documents, most nonapplicants are reportedly referencing PHAB requirements. The most commonly reported perceived benefits of accreditation among health departments that planned to or were undecided about applying for accreditation were as follows: increased awareness of strengths and weaknesses, stimulated quality improvement (QI) and performance improvement activities, and increased awareness of/focus on QI. Nonapplicants that planned to apply reported a higher level of these perceived benefits. Compared with health departments that had been accredited for 1 year, nonapplicants were more likely to report that their staff had no or limited QI knowledge or familiarity. CONCLUSIONS: The PHAB accreditation program has influenced the broader public health field-not solely health departments that have undergone accreditation. Regardless of their intent to apply for accreditation, nonapplicant health departments are reportedly referencing PHAB guidelines for developing the CHA, CHIP, and health department strategic plan. Health departments may experience benefits associated with accreditation prior to their formal involvement in the PHAB accreditation process. The most common challenge for health departments applying for accreditation is identifying the time and resources to dedicate to the process.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/normas , Percepción , Salud Pública/métodos , Acreditación/métodos , Acreditación/tendencias , Humanos , Internet , Gobierno Local , Salud Pública/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 24 Suppl 3: S10-S18, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29595592

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) is now in its 10th year, making it an ideal time to study the impact of PHAB accreditation on local health departments (LHDs). OBJECTIVE: To examine whether applying for PHAB accreditation affects perceptions and activities regarding quality improvement (QI) and performance management (PM) within LHDs. DESIGN: Data from the National Association of County & City Health Officials' 2010, 2013, and 2016 National Profile of Local Health Departments and associated QI modules were linked to PHAB-applicant data collected in e-PHAB in a cross-sectional and longitudinal approach examining self-reported QI/PM activities. PARTICIPANTS: Local health departments responding to National Association of County & City Health Officials Profile questionnaires and QI modules in 2010, 2013, and 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Implementation of formal QI program within agency, numbers of formal QI projects in the past year, presence of elements indicating formal QI program implementation, and changes over time by accreditation status as of June 2017. RESULTS: Accredited and in-process LHDs showed greater gains over time in all of the outcome measures than LHDs not registered in e-PHAB. Results of logistic regression controlling for population served and governance type found accredited LHDs more likely to report formal QI programs agency-wide (odds ratio: [OR] = 27.0; P < .001) and have implemented 6 to 8 elements of formal QI (OR = 27.0; P < .001) in 2016, compared with nonaccreditation-seeking LHDs. Between 2013 and 2016, LHDs that responded to both survey waves that were registered in e-PHAB or accredited were significantly more likely than nonaccreditation-seeking LHDs to report any increase in overall level of QI implementation (OR = 4.89; P = .006) and increase in number of elements of formal QI (OR = 16.1; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Local health departments accredited by June 2017 and those in process reported more formal QI activities and showed greater improvements with QI/PM implementation over time than LHDs not undertaking accreditation. Public Health Accreditation Board accreditation appears to influence QI/PM uptake. As health departments are contemplating whether to apply for accreditation, the potential for developing a more robust QI/PM system should be taken into account.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/métodos , Percepción , Salud Pública/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Acreditación/normas , Acreditación/tendencias , Humanos , Gobierno Local , Estudios Longitudinales , Salud Pública/instrumentación , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 24 Suppl 3: S72-S79, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29595605

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between local health departments' (LHDs') engagement in accreditation and their staffs' perceptions of workplace environment and the overall satisfaction with their jobs. DESIGN: Data from the 2014 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) (local data only) and the 2014 Forces of Change survey were linked using LHDs' unique ID documented by the National Association of County & City Health Officials. The Forces of Change survey assessed LHDs' accreditation status. Local health departments were classified as "formally engaged" in the Public Health Accreditation Board accreditation process if they had achieved accreditation, submitted an application, or submitted a statement of intent. The PH WINS survey measured employees' perception of 3 aspects of workplace environment, including supervisory support, organizational support, and employee engagement. The overall satisfaction was measured using the Job in General Scale (abridged). There are 1884 LHD employees who completed PH WINS and whose agencies responded to the question on the accreditation status of the Forces of Change survey. RESULTS: When compared with employees from LHDs less engaged in accreditation, employees from LHDs that were formally engaged in accreditation gave higher ratings to all 3 aspects of workplace environment and overall job satisfaction. Controlling for employee demographic characteristics and LHD jurisdiction size, the agency's formal engagement in accreditation remained related to a higher score in perceived workplace environment and job satisfaction. After controlling for perceived workplace environment, accreditation status was marginally associated with job satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The findings provide support for previous reports by LHD leaders on the benefits of accreditation related to employee morale and job satisfaction. The results from this study allow us to further catalog the benefits of accreditation in workforce development and identify factors that may moderate the extent of the benefits. Findings from this study show that engagement in public health accreditation is associated with overall job satisfaction. This link may be explained by the hypotheses that meeting accreditation standards could increase staff satisfaction or that having higher job satisfaction could lead to a higher likelihood that a health department would apply for accreditation. Further research to explore this relationship is critical as many health departments are weighing the value of accreditation as they face constrained financial resources.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/normas , Empleados de Gobierno/psicología , Percepción , Salud Pública/métodos , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Acreditación/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Gobierno Local , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología
17.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 23(2): 138-147, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27598711

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Community health assessments (CHAs) are a core function of local health departments (LHDs). Recently, completing a CHA has become a prerequisite for LHDs seeking accreditation by the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB). Similarly, under the Affordable Care Act, nonprofit hospitals are required to conduct periodic community health needs assessments (CHNAs). Opportunities thus exist for LHDs and hospitals to jointly complete CHAs/CHNAs. OBJECTIVE: This study examined existing LHD-hospital collaborations around CHAs/CHNAs, focusing specifically on the relationship between LHDs' level of engagement with PHAB accreditation activities and their collaboration with hospitals around CHAs/CHNAs. DESIGN: Data came from the 2013 NACCHO (National Association of County & City Health Officials) Profile Study and the Area Health Resource File. Complete data were available for 1332 LHDs that participated in the 2013 NACCHO Profile Study. Logistic regression explored the relationship between LHDs' completion of accreditation prerequisites, in particular completion of a CHA, community health improvement plan, and strategic plan, and their involvement in collaborations with tax-exempt hospitals around CHAs/CHNAs. RESULTS: LHDs that collaborated with tax-exempt hospitals on CHAs/CHNAs were larger, more likely to be locally governed, and more likely to have a local board of health. Bivariate analysis showed that CHA/CHNA-related collaboration with hospitals was significantly correlated (P < .01) with an LHD's completion of accreditation prerequisites. In multivariate regression analysis, completion of all 3 PHAB accreditation prerequisites significantly increased the odds of LHDs collaborating with hospitals when controlling for other LHD and community-level characteristics. CONCLUSION: PHAB accreditation prerequisites together with IRS requirements for hospitals foster potential for collaboration around CHAs/CHNAs. Joint completion of CHAs/CHNAs not only allows partners to complete the assessment more efficiently but has also been shown to produce higher-quality assessments, thus building a strong foundation for continued collaboration to improve community health.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/métodos , Conducta Cooperativa , Evaluación de Necesidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro/organización & administración , Salud Pública/métodos , Acreditación/tendencias , Hospitales/tendencias , Humanos , Gobierno Local , Salud Pública/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estados Unidos
18.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 23(6): e25-e35, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28492448

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: A national system of voluntary public health accreditation for state, local, and tribal health departments (local health departments [LHDs]) is part of a movement that aims to improve public health performance with ultimate impact on population health outcomes. Indiana is a good setting for the study of LHD accreditation adoption because several LHDs reported de-adopting accreditation in a recent statewide survey and because 71% of Indiana counties serve populations of 50 000 or less. DESIGN: A systematic method of analyzing qualitative data based on the Performance Improvement Model framework to expand our understanding of de-adoption of public health accreditation. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: In 2015, we conducted a key informant interview study of the 3 LHDs that decided to delay their engagement in the accreditation based on findings from an Indiana survey on LHD accreditation adoption. The study is an exploration of LHD accreditation de-adoption and of the contributions made to its understanding by the Performance Improvement Model. RESULT: The study found that top management team members are those who champion accreditation adoption, and that organizational structure and culture facilitate the staff's embracing of the change. The Performance Improvement Model was found to enhance the elucidation of the inner domain elements of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research in the context of de-adoption of public health accreditation. CONCLUSION: Governing entities' policies and priorities appear to mediate whether the LHDs are able to continue accreditation pursuit. Lacking any of these driving forces appears to be associated with decisions to de-adoption of accreditation. Further work is necessary to discern specific elements mediating decisions to pursue accreditation. This study demonstrates the added knowledge of Performance Improvement Model (PIM) to the CFIR framework. A large scale study is called to further clarify and discern supports of specific to the needs of individual LHDs for their performance improvement effort.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/tendencias , Salud Pública/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Acreditación/métodos , Humanos , Indiana , Gobierno Local , Salud Pública/métodos , Administración en Salud Pública/métodos , Administración en Salud Pública/normas , Investigación Cualitativa , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
Psychiatr Q ; 88(2): 235-247, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27796919

RESUMEN

The current terminology, goals, and general competency framework systematically utilized in the education of residents regardless of specialty is almost unrecognizable and quite foreign to those who trained before 2010. For example, the clinical and professional expectations for physicians-in-training have been placed onto a developmental framework of milestones. The expectations required during training have been expanded to include leadership and team participation skills, proficiency in the use of information technology, systems-based knowledge including respect of resources and cost of care, patient safety, quality improvement, population health and sensitivity to diversity for both individual and populations of patients. With these additions to physician training, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) hopes to remain accountable to the social contract between medicine and the public. With a focus on psychiatric practice, this article provides a general background and overview of the major overhaul of the accreditation process and educational goals for graduate medical education and briefly highlights possibilities for the future.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/tendencias , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Internado y Residencia/normas , Psiquiatría/educación , Competencia Clínica/normas , Humanos , Competencia Profesional/normas
20.
Mo Med ; 114(4): 278-282, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30228611

RESUMEN

With a growing focus on patient safety and trainee education, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education implemented changes including work hour restrictions, focused clinical competencies, and the Next Accreditation System (NAS). The NAS poses initial challenges on residencies with the implementation of surgical simulation programs and defining resident competency. It is the hope that innovative training methods will allow for improved advancement of knowledge and surgical skills given the current direction of post-graduate surgical training.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/normas , Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación de Postgrado/normas , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Acreditación/tendencias , Educación de Postgrado/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/educación , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/normas , Cirujanos/educación , Cirujanos/normas , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA