Osimertinib after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III EGFR-Mutated NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is a recommended treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and as adjuvant treatment for resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown preliminary efficacy in unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients with unresectable EGFR-mutated stage III NSCLC without progression during or after chemoradiotherapy to receive osimertinib or placebo until disease progression occurred (as assessed by blinded independent central review) or the regimen was discontinued. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients who had undergone chemoradiotherapy were randomly assigned to receive osimertinib (143 patients) or placebo (73 patients). Osimertinib resulted in a significant progression-free survival benefit as compared with placebo: the median progression-free survival was 39.1 months with osimertinib versus 5.6 months with placebo, with a hazard ratio for disease progression or death of 0.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 0.24; P<0.001). The percentage of patients who were alive and progression free at 12 months was 74% (95% CI, 65 to 80) with osimertinib and 22% (95% CI, 13 to 32) with placebo. Interim overall survival data (maturity, 20%) showed 36-month overall survival among 84% of patients with osimertinib (95% CI, 75 to 89) and 74% with placebo (95% CI, 57 to 85), with a hazard ratio for death of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.56; P = 0.53). The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was 35% in the osimertinib group and 12% in the placebo group; radiation pneumonitis (majority grade, 1 to 2) was reported in 48% and 38%, respectively. No new safety concerns emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with osimertinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than placebo in patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC. (Funded by AstraZeneca; LAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03521154.).

Pyrotinib combined with metronomic etoposide in heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a single-arm, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Exploration of novel combination mode of pyrotinib and chemotherapy for heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and how to balance survival benefits and compliance are still urgent problems in clinical practice. The current single-arm prospective phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with metronomic oral etoposide in heavily pretreated HER2-positive MBC. METHODS: HER2-positive MBC patients previously treated with trastuzumab were enrolled to receive oral pyrotinib 400 mg per day and metronomic oral etoposide 50 mg per day d1-21 every 28 days, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: 22 patients were enrolled with a median of 4 prior treatment regimens for MBC. During the follow-up of 20 evaluable patients, the median PFS was 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.6-10.4 months), and the median OS was 27.0 months (95%CI, 20.9-33.1 months). The ORR was 30% (6/20), the DCR was 80% (16/20), and the CBR was 65% (13/20). The most common grade 3 adverse events (AEs) included nausea (15%), vomiting (15%), diarrhea (5%), anemia (5%), and peripheral neuropathy (5%). No grade 4 or lethal AEs were observed. CONCLUSION: The combination of pyrotinib with metronomic oral etoposide has achieved promising clinical benefits in heavily pretreated HER2-positive MBC, with acceptable and manageable toxicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry number: NCT03923179. Registered April 18, 2019.

Intradermal Injection of a Thermoresponsive Polymeric Dexamethasone Prodrug (ProGel-Dex) Ameliorate Dermatitis in an Imiquimod (IMQ)-Induced Psoriasis-like Mouse Model.

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease, affecting ∼ 3% of the US population. Although multiple new systemic therapies have been introduced for the treatment of psoriatic skin disease, topical and intralesional glucocorticoids (GCs) continue to be used as effective psoriasis therapies. Their clinical utility, however, has been hampered by significant adverse effects, including skin atrophy and pigmentation as well as elevated blood glucose levels and hypertension. To mitigate these limitations, we have developed a N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymer-based thermoresponsive dexamethasone (Dex) prodrug (ProGel-Dex) and assessed its therapeutic efficacy and safety in an imiquimod (IMQ)-induced psoriasis-like (PL) mouse model. ProGel-Dex was intradermally administered once at three dosing levels: 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg/day Dex equivalent at the beginning of the study. PL mice were also treated with daily topical saline or Dex, which were used as control groups. Treatment of PL mice with ProGel-Dex dosed at 0.5 mg/kg/day resulted in a significant reduction in scaling and erythema. Improvement in gross pathology scores, skin histological scores, and serum cytokine levels was also observed. Interestingly, for mice treated with ProGel-Dex at 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg/day Dex equivalent, only improvement in skin erythema was observed. GC-associated side effects, such as elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and amylase levels and body weight loss, were not observed in mice treated with ProGel-Dex at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg/day Dex equivalent. Collectively, these results demonstrate the efficacy and improved safety of ProGel-Dex in treating psoriatic skin lesions when compared to topical Dex treatment, supporting its translational potential for clinical management of lesional skin psoriasis.

Delayed cardiotoxicity following osimertinib therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a unique case report.

This case report features a 62-year-old male with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 deletion, who underwent treatment with osimertinib following a left upper lobectomy and lymph node dissection. Despite a history of smoking and well-managed type 2 diabetes, the patient developed heart failure 18 months post-initiation of osimertinib therapy, marking one of the latest occurrences of heart failure following osimertinib treatment documented in limited literature. Cardiac MRI revealed significant left ventricular enlargement, lateral wall myocardial thinning, and localized myocardial fibrosis without perfusion defects, a finding not previously reported in literature. This case underscores the severe and unusual cardiac effects of osimertinib in patients with latent risk factors, highlighting the importance of vigilant cardiac monitoring and a multidisciplinary management approach.

Erythema dyschromicum perstans-like eruptions induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in patients with lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Cutaneous adverse reactions to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi) are some of the most common side effects that patients experience. However, cutaneous adverse reactions that cause dyspigmentation in patients have been rarely reported. Erythema dyschromicum perstans (EDP) is a rare pigmentary condition that causes ashy-grey hyperpigmented macules and patches, with a few cases reported from EGFRi in the literature. The disfiguration caused by this condition may negatively impact patients' quality of life. Our study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of EDP induced by EGFRi to better recognize and manage the condition. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective review at three academic institutions to identify patients with EDP induced by EGFRi from 2017 to 2023 and included sixteen patients in our study. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 66 years old, with 63% female and 37% male (Table 1). The majority of our patients were Asian (88%). All patients had non-small cell lung cancer and most patients received osimertinib. Median time to EDP was 6 months. The most common areas of distribution were the head/neck region, lower extremities, and upper extremities. Various topical ointments were trialed; however, approximately less than half had improvement in their disease and most patients had persistent EDP with no resolution. All patients desired treatment except one with EDP on the tongue, and there was no cancer treatment discontinuation or interruption due to EDP. Table 1 Patient demographics and clinical characteristics of 16 patients with EDP induced by EGFRi Case no Demographics: age, race, and sex Fitzpatrick skin type Cancer type EGFR therapy Concomitant photosensitive drug(s) Time to EDP (months) Clinical features Distribution Symptoms Treatments and clinical course EDP status from most recent follow up 1 47 y/o Asian male III Stage IV NSCLC Erlotinib None Unknown Brown-blue-gray hyperpigmented patches Bilateral shins Left thigh Xerosis Pruritus Triamcinolone 0.1% ointment for 4 months, improvement of blue discoloration Tacrolimus 0.1% BID for 9 months, improvement but no resolution Ongoing 2 62 y/o Asian female IV Stage IV NSCLC Osimertinib None 4 Gray-brown hyperpigmented patches Bilateral arms Back Forehead Neck Right shin None Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment for 1 year with minor improvement Ongoing 3 69 y/o Asian female IV Stage IV NSCLC Osimertinib None 4 Gray-brown macules and patches Chest Face Forehead Bilateral legs None Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment for 10 months, no improvement Ongoing 4 79 y/o White male II Stage IV NSCLC Osimertinib None 15 Mottled grey-blue hyperpigmented patches and plaques with mild scaling Bilateral arms Back Forehead Neck None Photoprotection, no improvement Ongoing 5 69 y/o Asian female III Stage IV NSCLC Osimertinib Ibuprofen 4 Blue-grey hyperpigmented macules and patches Abdomen Bilateral arms None Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment for 7 months, no improvement Ongoing 6 65 y/o Asian male III Stage IV NSCLC Osimertinib None 20 Hyperpigmented blue gray macules and patches Helix Bilateral shins None Photoprotection, no improvement Ongoing 7 66 y/o Asian female IV Stage IV NSCLC Erlotinib TMP-SMX 6 Ashy grey-brown thin plaques Back Forehead None 2.5% hydrocortisone ointment for 8 months, resolved Resolved 8 82 y/o Asian male III Stage III NSCLC Erlotinib Simvastatin 20 Ash-grey hyperpigmented patches Dorsal feet Forehead Scalp None Photoprotection Ongoing 9 57 y/o Asian female III Stage II NSCLC Erlotinib None 1 Bue-grey discoloration Tongue None No intervention Ongoing 10 51 y/o Asian female III Stage IV NSCLC Osimertinib None 9 Blue-grey hyperpigmented macules and patches Bilateral arms Axillae Groin Neck Trunk None 2.5% hydrocortisone ointment, triamcinolone 0.1% ointment, photoprotection with mild improvement Ongoing 11 67 y/o Asian male III Stage IV NSCLC Osimertinib None 7 Gray-blue macules and patches with mild background erythema and scaling Bilateral arms Ears Face Bilateral shins None Triamcinolone 0.1% ointment, protection for 6 months with mild improvement Ongoing 12 75 y/o Asian female IV Stage III NSCLC Osimertinib TMP-SMX 3 Gray-blue hyperpigmented patches Bilateral arms Abdomen Back Face Bilateral shins Pruritus Triamcinolone 0.1% and betamethasone 0.01% with relief of pruritus, lesions unchanged Triluma cream 6 months, mild improvement Ongoing 13 42 y/o Asian male IV Stage IV NSCLC Afatinib TMP-SMX 24 Grey-brown hyperpigmented patches Back Face None Hydroquinone 4% cream for 2 years with mild improvement Ongoing 14 74 y/o White female III Stage II NSCLC Osimertinib Atorvastatin 4 Grey-brown hyperpigmented patches Bilateral legs Trunk None Photoprotection Ongoing 15 64 y/o Asian female IV Stage IV NSCLC Osimertinib None 3 Gray-brown hyperpigmentation Abdomen Bilateral arms Back Bilateral legs Pruritus Triamcinolone 0.1% cream; No change, minimal concern to patient Ongoing 16 52 y/o Asian female IV Stage IV NSCLC Osimertinib None 42 Gray hyperpigmented patches with digitate shape Abdomen Bilateral flanks None Triamcinolone 0.1% cream Ongoing NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer, TMP-SMX, Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole CONCLUSIONS: We highlight the largest case series describing EDP from EGFR inhibitors, which mostly affected Asian patients with lung malignancy and on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Clinicians should be able to recognize this condition in their patients and assess how it is affecting their quality of life, and refer to dermatology to help with management.

Drug-induced liver injury associated with savolitinib: a novel case report and causality assessment.

BACKGROUND: Savolitinib, a small molecule inhibitor, has gained approval as the inaugural medication in China that specifically targets MET kinase. Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who show MET exon 14 skipping now have a new and innovative treatment option available. CASE REPORT: In this case report, we describe a patient who experienced drug-induced liver injury (DILI) due to the administration of savolitinib. After being prescribed with savolitinib (400 mg per day, oral), a 73-year-old male diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutation experienced an increase in liver enzymes and bilirubin levels according to his laboratory tests conducted one month later. Following a 14-day course of hepatoprotective medication, the liver function reverted back to its normal state. After receiving savolitinib (200 mg per day, oral) for one week, the patient was once again diagnosed with severe liver impairment. Then savolitinib was discontinued and received treatment with hepatoprotective drugs for one week. Following the restoration of normal liver function, another attempt was made to administer a small amount of savolitinib (100 mg per day, oral). Thus far, the patient has been followed up and there has been no recurrence of liver damage. Additionally, the lung CT scan revealed ongoing tumor shrinkage with no apparent indications of spreading or metastasis. The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) determined that savolitinib was "highly probable" cause of DILI. Moderate-severe was determined to be the extent of DILI severity. CONCLUSION: To the best of our understanding, this is the initial instance of DILI resulting from the use of savolitinib as a standalone treatment in a real-world setting. During the administration of savolitinib, healthcare professionals should carefully consider the potential occurrence of DILI. Administering the patient with a small amount of savolitinib resulted in a remarkable response against the tumor, leading us to speculate that the effectiveness of savolitinib might be associated with its plasma concentration. Studying the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of savolitinib is beneficial for tailoring and accurately prescribing the medication to each individual.

Oral lichenoid drug eruption due to osimertinib for lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR) are linked with side effects involving skin and mucosa. Herein, we present a unique case of oral lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) in a patient treated with osimertinib. CASE REPORT: A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, and started on osimertinib 80 mg PO daily. At 24 months of therapy, the patient developed a painful, red, and white striated oral lesion involving the left buccal mucosa and the adjacent buccal aspect of gingivae. Biopsy showed oral LDE. Causality assessment between osimertinib and the oral LDE via Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction probability scale revealed a score of 5. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Osimetinib discontinuation was not felt to be in the best interest of the patient. Therefore, diphenhydramine HCL mouthwash every 6 h PRN (before meals) was started. Spicy and hot foods were discontinued. At a four-week follow-up visit, the patient reported moderate improvement in her symptoms. CONCLUSION: Oral LDEs are considered premalignant lesions as they can transform into squamous cell carcinoma; therefore, regular follow-up is needed. Awareness of this potential side effect of osimertinib would also prevent unnecessary (and potentially costly) work-up and lead to its prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Pyrotinib for Human Epidermal Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib shows the potential to improve treatment response in human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients, but relevant meta-analyses are scarce. This meta-analysis intended to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pyrotinib for HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety between HER2-positive breast cancer patients receiving pyrotinib-containing neoadjuvant treatment (pyrotinib group) and those receiving other neoadjuvant treatments (control group), were searched in EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and SinoMed until December 2023. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 cohort studies were included. The pyrotinib group and control group contained 540 and 684 patients, respectively. Pathological complete response (pCR) was higher in the pyrotinib group than in the control group [relative risk (RR)=1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.63-2.29; P < 0.001]. Similar results were discovered in subgroup analyses of RCTs (RR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.49-2.40; P < 0.001) and cohort studies (RR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.55-2.53; P < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was also higher in the pyrotinib group than in the control group (RR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.07-1.21; P < 0.001). Regarding adverse events, only the incidence of diarrhea was increased in the pyrotinib group versus the control group (RR = 1.97; 95% CI = 1.31-2.96; P = 0.001), while others were not different, including nausea and vomiting, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, hand-foot syndrome, and alopecia (all P > 0.05). No publication bias existed, and sensitivity analysis suggested the satisfactory robustness of this meta-analysis. In conclusion, compared with other neoadjuvant treatments, pyrotinib-containing neoadjuvant treatment achieves a better treatment response with a good safety profile in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Adverse Events in Osimertinib Treatment for EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Unveiling Rare Life-Threatening Myelosuppression.

Recent advancements in targeted therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), specifically focusing on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, have revolutionized treatment strategies. Osimertinib, an approved therapy for metastatic NSCLC with EGFR mutations, highlights remarkable efficacy but also harbors the potential for severe adverse events, whose rarity or lack of precedence may mask their criticality. This article delves into the exploration of adverse events linked to osimertinib, shedding light on a rare yet life-threatening occurrence: severe myelosuppression. A case study detailing a patient with EGFR-mutated NSCLC exhibiting a robust treatment response but experiencing severe myelosuppression following osimertinib initiation is presented. Immediate discontinuation of osimertinib alongside concurrent blood transfusions facilitated toxicity recovery, prompting a successful reduction in myelosuppression severity upon re-administration at a lowered dosage.

Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. A phase 3 trial compared first-line osimertinib with other EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The trial showed longer progression-free survival with osimertinib than with the comparator EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46). Data from the final analysis of overall survival have not been reported. METHODS: In this trial, we randomly assigned 556 patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with an EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or L858R allele) in a 1:1 ratio to receive either osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or one of two other EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily or erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg once daily, with patients receiving these drugs combined in a single comparator group). Overall survival was a secondary end point. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 38.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5 to 41.8) in the osimertinib group and 31.8 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 36.0) in the comparator group (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95.05% CI, 0.64 to 1.00; P = 0.046). At 3 years, 79 of 279 patients (28%) in the osimertinib group and 26 of 277 (9%) in the comparator group were continuing to receive a trial regimen; the median exposure was 20.7 months and 11.5 months, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 42% of the patients in the osimertinib group and in 47% of those in the comparator group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with an EGFR mutation, those who received osimertinib had longer overall survival than those who received a comparator EGFR-TKI. The safety profile for osimertinib was similar to that of the comparator EGFR-TKIs, despite a longer duration of exposure in the osimertinib group. (Funded by AstraZeneca; FLAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02296125.).

Osimertinib in Resected EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is standard-of-care therapy for previously untreated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy and safety of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy are unknown. METHODS: In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with completely resected EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in a 1:1 ratio to receive either osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or placebo for 3 years. The primary end point was disease-free survival among patients with stage II to IIIA disease (according to investigator assessment). The secondary end points included disease-free survival in the overall population of patients with stage IB to IIIA disease, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 682 patients underwent randomization (339 to the osimertinib group and 343 to the placebo group). At 24 months, 90% of the patients with stage II to IIIA disease in the osimertinib group (95% confidence interval [CI], 84 to 93) and 44% of those in the placebo group (95% CI, 37 to 51) were alive and disease-free (overall hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.17; 99.06% CI, 0.11 to 0.26; P<0.001). In the overall population, 89% of the patients in the osimertinib group (95% CI, 85 to 92) and 52% of those in the placebo group (95% CI, 46 to 58) were alive and disease-free at 24 months (overall hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.20; 99.12% CI, 0.14 to 0.30; P<0.001). At 24 months, 98% of the patients in the osimertinib group (95% CI, 95 to 99) and 85% of those in the placebo group (95% CI, 80 to 89) were alive and did not have central nervous system disease (overall hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.33). Overall survival data were immature; 29 patients died (9 in the osimertinib group and 20 in the placebo group). No new safety concerns were noted. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stage IB to IIIA EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, disease-free survival was significantly longer among those who received osimertinib than among those who received placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ADAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02511106.).

Efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in advanced lung adenocarcinoma with HER2 mutations: a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of effective treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring HER2 mutations. We examined the efficacy and safety of, and potential resistance mechanism to, pyrotinib, a pan-HER inhibitor, in advanced NSCLC carrying HER2 mutations. METHODS: In this multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial, stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients harboring HER2 mutations, as determined using next-generation sequencing, were enrolled and treated with pyrotinib at a dose of 400 mg/day. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. The impact of different HER2 mutation types on sensitivity to pyrotinib and the potential of utilizing mutational profile derived from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to predict disease progression were also explored. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled for efficacy and safety analysis. The 6-month PFS rate was 49.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.2-60.8). Pyrotinib produced an ORR of 19.2% (95% CI, 11.2-30.0), with median PFS of 5.6 months (95% CI, 2.8-8.4), and median OS of 10.5 months (95% CI, 8.7-12.3). The median duration of response was 9.9 months (95% CI, 6.2-13.6). All treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1-3 (all, 91.0%; grade 3, 20.5%), and the most common TRAE was diarrhea (all, 85.9%; grade 3, 16.7%). Patients with exon 20 and non-exon 20 HER2 mutations had ORRs of 17.7% and 25.0%, respectively. Brain metastases at baseline and prior exposure to afatinib were not associated with ORR, PFS, or OS. Loss of HER2 mutations and appearance of amplification in HER2 and EGFR were detected upon disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Pyrotinib exhibited promising efficacy and acceptable safety in NSCLC patients carrying exon 20 and non-exon 20 HER2 mutations and is worth further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1800020262.

Rationale and design of a phase II trial of pyrotinib in combination with nab-paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for N0/N1mi, HER2 + early breast cancer (PHAEDRA).

BACKGROUND: The de-escalation treatment in patients with low-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer (eBC) is an attractive strategy to avoid unnecessary treatment and improve the quality of life of patients. Pyrotinib, a novel irreversible pan-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has shown efficacy in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Meanwhile, nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel reveals survival benefit over solvent-based paclitaxel and eliminates the toxicities associated with the solvent. However, the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with nab-paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for low-risk HER2 + eBC patients have not been evaluated. METHODS: This is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II study. A sample size of 261 patients with tumor ≤ 3 cm, lymph node-negative (N0) or micrometastatic (N1mi), HER2 + breast cancer will be recruited. Eligible patients will receive nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for 12 weeks and pyrotinib 400 mg once daily for one year. The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival. A sub-study will be conducted to investigate different prophylactic strategies for diarrhea, which is the most common adverse event of pan-HER TKIs. One hundred and twenty patients from the main study will be randomly (1:1) allocated to receive loperamide either during the first cycle (4 mg tid on days 1-7, then 4 mg bid on days 8-21) or the first 2 cycles (4 mg tid on days 1-7, then 4 mg bid on days 8-42). The primary endpoint of the sub-study is the incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea. DISCUSSION: This is the first prospective study of pyrotinib in combination with nab-paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for patients with low-risk HER2-positive eBC. It would probably provide robust evidence for de-escalating strategy of HER2-positive eBC and appropriate management for pyrotinib-related diarrhea. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04659499 . Registered on December 9, 2020.

Pyrotinib treatment enhances the radiosensitivity in HER2-positive brain metastatic breast cancer patients.

Brain metastasis is a common cause of death in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Currently, it is mainly treated by whole-brain radiotherapy. Pyrotinib is an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, which has demonstrated promising tumor-suppressing activity and acceptable tolerance in previous phase trials. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of pyrotinib on HER2-positive brain metastatic breast cancer patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy. A total of 20 such patients were separated into pyrotinib plus capecitabine and capecitabine-only groups in a 1:1 ratio. All patients met either the primary or secondary endpoints. Oral admission of pyrotinib together with radiotherapy can significantly increase the overall response rate, progression-free survival, time to progression and duration of response of HER2+ brain metastatic breast cancer patients, without causing extra adverse events. In addition, pyrotinib can enhance the radiosensitivity of in-vitro cultured HER2+ breast cancer cell lines. The outcome of our study suggests that pyrotinib might be an effective medication to enhance the tumor radiosensitivity of HER2-positive brain metastatic breast cancer patients.

MARIPOSA: phase 3 study of first-line amivantamab + lazertinib versus osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer.

Third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as osimertinib, have demonstrated efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer; however, almost all patients will eventually relapse. Amivantamab is an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity that targets activating and resistance EGFR mutations and MET mutations and amplifications. In the ongoing CHRYSALIS study (NCT02609776), amivantamab in combination with lazertinib, a potent, brain-penetrant third-generation EGFR TKI, demonstrated antitumor activity in the treatment-naive and osimertinib-relapsed setting. Here the authors present the methodology for the MARIPOSA study (NCT04487080), a phase 3, multicenter, randomized study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of amivantamab and lazertinib combination therapy versus single-agent osimertinib as first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer.

Plain language summary Osimertinib is the standard-of-care treatment for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer caused by mutations in the EGFR. However, patients will eventually see their disease return because their tumors will develop new mutations that are resistant to osimertinib treatment. Amivantamab is a new antibody treatment that blocks the EGFR and another receptor called the MET receptor, to stop the growth of lung tumor cells. In an ongoing clinical trial, called the CHRYSALIS study, when amivantamab was given with lazertinib (another drug that blocks the EGFR), lung tumors shrank in patients whose lung cancer had not been previously treated. A new clinical trial called the MARIPOSA study (NCT04487080) aims to compare the antitumor activity and safety of the amivantamab + lazertinib combination versus osimertinib alone in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer who have not received treatment for their lung cancer. Trial registration number: NCT04487080 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Fingerprint loss during combination therapy using osimertinib and anlotinib: A case report.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Recent studies prove that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors combined with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are more effective than EGFR TKI monotherapy for treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the adverse effects associated with this treatment require further investigation. We report a case of fingerprint loss secondary to combination therapy using osimertinib (an EGFR TKI that targets mutated EGFR kinases) and anlotinib (a TKI that acts on multiple targets including mutated VEGFR kinases). CASE SUMMARY: A 55-year-old man with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and an EGFR L858R mutation received a 5-month course of platinum-based chemotherapy and icotinib. This regimen was subsequently switched to osimertinib plus anlotinib to achieve a better tumour response. This therapy led to fingerprint loss, which recovered following discontinuation of anlotinib treatment but subsequently recurred. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report that describes fingerprint loss during combination therapy using osimertinib and anlotinib.

Successful Management of Osimertinib-Induced Heart Failure.

Cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction is currently of great concern as one of the pivotal therapeutic targets of onco-cardiology. Only a few studies have reported the occurrence of heart failure following the administration of osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor for EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We report on a 74-year-old woman with osimertinib-induced advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, which was treated by the temporal termination of osimertinib and neurohormonal blocker therapy, as well as heart rate modulation therapy using ivabradine. Despite osimertinib-induced heart failure being relatively rare, aggressive neurohormonal blocker therapy using ivabradine if applicable, as well as the temporal termination of osimertinib, might be a promising therapeutic strategy.

Retrospective analysis of osimertinib re-challenge after osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has exhibited efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a fatal adverse event of osimertinib treatment, and it requires treatment discontinuation. There are few reports regarding the safety and efficacy of osimertinib re-challenge in patients who experienced osimertinib-induced ILD. This retrospective study assessed this treatment option. We retrospectively collected data for patients treated with osimertinib who developed ILD at Shizuoka Cancer Center from April 2016 to March 2020. ILD was diagnosed by two doctors based on imaging tests and blood tests to exclude other causes. Among 215 patients treated with osimertinib, 28 developed ILD. The median age of patients with ILD was 69.5 years (range, 39.0-80.0). In addition, 29% of patients were men, and 46% had a history of smoking. Eleven patients were re-administered EGFR TKIs, including eight patients treated with osimertinib and three patients treated with alternative EGFR TKIs. Among patients re-challenged with osimertinib, none who previously experienced grade 1 ILD exhibited ILD relapse, even with the same osimertinib dose and without the concurrent administration of systemic steroids. Meanwhile, one of the four patients who previously exhibited grade 2 ILD experienced despite a dose reduction for osimertinib and systemic steroid administration. For patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who experience grade 1 ILD during osimertinib therapy, osimertinib re-challenge may be suitable when no other treatments are available.

Osimertinib alone as second-line treatment for brain metastases (BM) control may be more limited than for non-BM in advanced NSCLC patients with an acquired EGFR T790M mutation.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the difference between brain metastases (BM) and non-brain metastases (non-BM) treated by osimertinib in advanced patients with an acquired EGFR T790M mutation after obtaining first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance. METHODS: A total number of 135 first-generation EGFR-TKI-resistant patients with an acquired EGFR T790M mutation were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into BM and non-BM groups. According to the type of treatment (whether brain radiotherapy), the BM patients were divided into an osimertinib combined with brain radiotherapy group and an osimertinib without brain radiotherapy group. In addition, according to the type of BM (the sequence between BM and osimertinib), the BM patients were subdivided into an osimertinib after BM group (initial BM developed after obtaining first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance) and an osimertinib before BM group (first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance then osimertinib administration performed; initial BM was not developed until osimertinib resistance). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The primary endpoint was OS between BM and no-BM patients. The secondary endpoints were PFS of osimertinib, and OS between brain radiotherapy and non-brain radiotherapy patients. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients were eligible and the median follow-up time of all patients was 50 months. The patients with BM (n = 54) had inferior OS than those without BM (n = 81) (45 months vs. 55 months, P = 0.004). And in BM group, the OS was longer in patients that received osimertinib combined with brain radiotherapy than in those without brain radiotherapy (53 months vs. 40 months, P = 0.014). In addition, the PFS was analysed according to whether developed BM after osimertinib resistance. The PFS of the patients that developed BM after acquiring osimertinib resistance was shorter than that without BM development, whether patients developed initial BM after first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance (7 months vs. 13 months, P = 0.003), or developed non-BM after first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance (13 months vs. 17 months, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In advanced patients with an acquired EGFR T790M mutation after obtaining first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance, osimertinib may be more limited in its control in BM than in non-BM. Also, osimertinib combined with brain radiotherapy may improve the survival time of BM patients.

Osimertinib in advanced EGFR-T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients treated within the Special Use Medication Program in Spain: OSIREX-Spanish Lung Cancer Group.

BACKGROUND: AURA study reported 61% objective response rate and progression-free survival of 9.6 months with osimertinib in patients with EGFR/T790M+ non-small cell lung cancer. Due to lack of real-world data, we proposed this study to describe the experience with osimertinib in Spain. METHODS: Post-authorization, non-interventional Special Use Medication Program, multicenter, retrospective study in advanced EGFR/T790M+ non-small cell lung cancer. One hundred-fifty five patients were enrolled (August 2016-December 2018) from 30 sites. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: progression-free survival. Secondary objectives: toxicity profile, objective response rate, and use of health service resources. RESULTS: 70% women, median age 66. 63.9% were non-smokers and 99% had adenocarcinoma. Most patients had received at least one prior treatment (97%), 91.7% had received previous EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and 2.8% osimertinib as first-line treatment. At data cutoff, median follow-up was 11.8 months. One hundred-fifty five patients were evaluable for response, 1.3% complete response, 40.6% partial response, 31% stable disease and 11.6% disease progression. Objective response rate was 42%. Median progression-free survival was 9.4 months. Of the 155 patients who received treatment, 76 (49%) did not reported any adverse event, 51% presented some adverse event, most of which were grade 1 or 2. The resource cost study indicates early use is warranted. CONCLUSION: This study to assess the real-world clinical impact of osimertinib showed high drug activity in pretreated advanced EGFR/T790M+ non-small cell lung cancer, with manageable adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration number: NCT03790397 .