Prolonged QRS Widening After Aripiprazole Overdose.

BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole is an atypical antipsychotic with a long half-life. Overdose can result in protracted somnolence and cardiac disturbances, particularly QT interval prolongation. METHODS: This is a single case report of a 14-year-old boy who took an overdose of aripiprazole and developed QRS widening. CASE: A 14-year-old boy intentionally ingested 20 tablets of aripiprazole (5 mg). He was brought to the emergency department when his ingestion was discovered. The patient's vital signs were as follows: temperature, 37.7°C; heart rate, 108 beats/min; blood pressure, 138/98 mm Hg; and respirations, 16 breaths/min. Activated charcoal was administered within 90 minutes of ingestion. Initial electrocardiogram (EKG) showed sinus tachycardia, with a QRS of 138 ms and QT interval of 444 ms. QRS duration was 90 ms on an EKG performed 3 months earlier. A bolus of sodium bicarbonate was administered, and the patient was transferred to the pediatric intensive care unit. Repeat EKG demonstrated a QRS of 156 ms, and a sodium bicarbonate infusion was initiated. The patient continued to have QRS prolongation for the next 8 days, reaching a peak of 172 ms 3 days postingestion. Despite aggressive treatment with sodium bicarbonate, there was persistent QRS prolongation; however, the patient did not have any dysrhythmias and remained hemodynamically stable. The patient was discharged 9 days postingestion when the QRS duration normalized to 82 ms. Genetic testing revealed that the patient was a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer. CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that aripiprazole toxicity may possibly be associated with QRS prolongation without associated dysrhythmias or cardiovascular compromise. In addition, toxicity may be prolonged in patients who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers.

Overdoses with Aripiprazole: Signs, Symptoms and Outcome in 239 Exposures Reported to the Danish Poison Information Centre.

The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical signs and symptoms of exposures to aripiprazole overdoses. We retrospectively identified all aripiprazole exposures reported to the Danish Poison Information Centre (DPIC) from June 2007 to May 2015. Information concerning demographics, ingested dose and symptoms was extracted from the DPIC database and medical records. Information on death and admission to hospital was obtained from Danish national registers. We analysed 239 cases, 86 concerning single-drug exposures to aripiprazole, and 153 cases where aripiprazole had been taken with at least one other substance (mixed-drug). The median ingested aripiprazole dose was 105 mg (IQR: 50-1680 mg) in the single-drug exposure group and 120 mg (IQR: 60-225 mg) in the mixed-drug exposure group. The most commonly reported symptom was light sedation, reported in 63% of the single-drug group and 50% of the mixed-drug exposure group. There were no malignant arrhythmias or ECG abnormalities after single-drug exposures. No deaths were recorded in relation to the intake. We found a long-term mortality rate of 13 deaths per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 7; 23 per 1000 person-years), which is significantly higher than in an age- and gender-matched background population. In conclusion, we found that aripiprazole overdoses had few and mild symptoms predominantly related to the sedative properties. We detected a benign cardiovascular safety profile and no new safety concerns. Our findings may support an increased threshold of 300 mg for hospital admission after a single-drug exposure with aripiprazole and symptoms not worse than light sedation.

Atypical permanent neurological sequelae after an acute intoxication with lithium and aripiprazole.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present case report was to describe atypical neurological sequelae after a lithium and aripiprazole co-intoxication in a suicide attempt. METHODS: We report the case of a 31-year-old patient with bipolar disorder who developed, after lithium and aripiprazole massive ingestion, a severe pseudobulbar dysarthria and motor disorders suggestive of basal ganglia micro lesions. We review literature on neurological sequelae due to acute lithium intoxications. RESULTS: Acute lithium intoxication can cause permanent neurological sequelae, the most frequent clinical feature being a permanent cerebellar syndrome. Moreover, the widely-prescribed combination of lithium with antipsychotics increases the neurotoxicity in lithium intoxications. In this case, both atypical neurological syndrome and normal paraclinical investigations lead first to misdiagnose the lithium neurological damages. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates that acute lithium intoxications can result in serious and potentially permanent neurological deficits, which remain difficult to diagnose. Imaging abnormalities are not constant, and neurological presentation can be atypical.

Case Reports of Aripiprazole Causing False-Positive Urine Amphetamine Drug Screens in Children.

Urine drug screens (UDSs) are used to identify the presence of certain medications. One limitation of UDSs is the potential for false-positive results caused by cross-reactivity with other substances. Amphetamines have an extensive list of cross-reacting medications. The literature contains reports of false-positive amphetamine UDSs with multiple antidepressants and antipsychotics. We present 2 cases of presumed false-positive UDSs for amphetamines after ingestion of aripiprazole. Case 1 was a 16-month-old girl who accidently ingested 15 to 45 mg of aripiprazole. She was lethargic and ataxic at home with 1 episode of vomiting containing no identifiable tablets. She remained sluggish with periods of irritability and was admitted for observation. UDS on 2 consecutive days came back positive for amphetamines. Case 2 was of a 20-month-old girl who was brought into the hospital after accidental ingestion of an unknown quantity of her father's medications which included aripiprazole. UDS on the first day of admission came back positive only for amphetamines. Confirmatory testing with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) on the blood and urine samples were also performed for both patients on presentation to detect amphetamines and were subsequently negative. Both patients returned to baseline and were discharged from the hospital. To our knowledge, these cases represent the first reports of false-positive amphetamine urine drug tests with aripiprazole. In both cases, aripiprazole was the drug with the highest likelihood of causing the positive amphetamine screen. The implications of these false-positives include the possibility of unnecessary treatment and monitoring of patients.