RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This randomized, parallel-controlled, double-blinded, phase III equivalence study evaluated the equivalence of a proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 to the pertuzumab (Perjeta®) each with trastuzumab and docetaxel in neoadjuvant treatment of early or locally advanced breast cancer patients with HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to receive 4 cycles of neoadjuvant QL1209 or pertuzumab each with trastuzumab and docetaxel, and adjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint was total pathologic complete response (tpCR), with equivalence margins of 0.76 to 1.32. RESULTS: Among the 585 patients enrolled, 257 and 259 patients were assigned to the QL1209 and pertuzumab groups, respectively. The tpCR rates were comparable in the QL1209 (109/255, 42.75%; 90% CI 37.65 to 47.84) and pertuzumab (117/259, 45.17%; 90% CI 40.09 to 50.26) groups. The tpCR risk ratio was 0.95 (90% CI, 0.80 to 1.11), and the 90% CI fell within the predefined equivalence margin. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was decreased neutrophil count (10. 9% vs. 12.7%) in the QL1209 and pertuzumab groups. CONCLUSIONS: QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and comparable safety profile to the reference pertuzumab in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative, early, or locally advanced breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinadrugtrials.org CTR20201073; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04629846.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Neoplasias de la Mama , Docetaxel , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Receptor ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Adulto , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismoRESUMEN
AIM: To assess whether multiple switches between SAR341402 biosimilar insulin aspart (SAR-Asp) and the insulin aspart reference product (NovoLog; NN-Asp) leads to equivalent pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure compared with continuous use of NN-Asp in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study randomized (1:1) 210 subjects with T1D treated with once-daily insulin glargine U100 as basal insulin to four 4-week periods of alternating multiple daily injections of SAR-Asp and NN-Asp (NN-Asp for the first 4 weeks, SAR-Asp in the last 4 weeks; switching group) versus 16 weeks of continuous NN-Asp (non-switching group). At week 16, a single dose (0.15 U/kg) of SAR-Asp in the switching group (n = 95) or NN-Asp in the non-switching group (n = 105) was given in the morning before breakfast. Primary PK endpoints were area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of SAR-Asp versus NN-Asp after the single dose at week 16. RESULTS: The extent of PK exposure was similar between the two treatments (SAR-Asp in the switching group and NN-Asp in the non-switching group) at week 16, with point estimates of treatment ratios close to 1. The 90% confidence intervals for AUC treatment ratios were contained within 0.8-1.25. For Cmax in the primary analysis set, the upper confidence limit was 1.32. This was because of the profiles of three participants with implausible high values. A prespecified sensitivity analysis excluding implausible values showed results contained within 0.8-1.25. CONCLUSIONS: PK exposure of SAR-Asp (switching group) and reference NN-Asp (non-switching group) were similar, supporting interchangeability between these two insulin aspart products.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Adulto , Humanos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Glucemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacocinética , Insulina/farmacocinética , Insulina Aspart/farmacocinética , Insulina Glargina/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a blinding retinal disease. Monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF antibody injections of bevacizumab (off-label) and ranibizumab (FDA approved) are the standard of care. Antibody aggregation may interfere with ocular absorption/distribution. This study assessed topical delivery of dilute antibodies to the posterior segment of rabbit eyes using a novel anti-aggregation formula (AAF). METHODS: Bevacizumab, or biosimilar ranibizumab was diluted to 5 mg/ml in AAF. All rabbits were dosed twice daily. Substudy 1 rabbits (bevacizumab, 100 µl eye drops): Group 1 (bevacizumab/AAF, n = 6); Group 2 (bevacizumab/PBS, n = 7) and Vehicle control (AAF, n = 1). Substudy 2 rabbits (ranibizumab biosimilar/AAF, 50 µl eye drops): (ranibizumab biosimilar/AAF, n = 8). At 14.5 days, serum was drawn from rabbits. Aqueous, vitreous and retina samples were recovered from eyes and placed into AAF aliquots. Tissue analyzed using AAF as diluent. RESULTS: Bevacizumab in AAF permeated/accumulated in rabbit aqueous, vitreous and retina 10 times more, than when diluted in PBS. AAF/0.1% hyaluronic acid eye drops, dosed twice daily, provided mean tissue concentrations (ng/g) in retina (29.50), aqueous (12.34), vitreous (3.46), and serum (0.28 ng/ml). Additionally, the highest concentration (ng/g) of ranibizumab biosimilar was present in the retina (18.0), followed by aqueous (7.82) and vitreous (1.47). Serum concentration was negligible (< 0.04 ng/ml). No irritation was observed throughout the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab and ranibizumab, in an AAF diluent eye drop, can be delivered to the retina, by the twice daily dosing of a low concentration mAb formulation. This may prove to be an adjunct to intravitreal injections.
Asunto(s)
Bevacizumab , Soluciones Oftálmicas , Ranibizumab , Retina , Animales , Ranibizumab/administración & dosificación , Ranibizumab/farmacocinética , Conejos , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/farmacocinética , Soluciones Oftálmicas/administración & dosificación , Retina/metabolismo , Retina/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/farmacocinética , Cuerpo Vítreo/metabolismo , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab (UST) is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To compare efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of the proposed UST biosimilar SB17 with reference UST in subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In this randomized double-blind study, subjects were randomized to receive 45 mg of SB17 or UST subcutaneously at week 0, 4, and every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at week 12 with an equivalence margin of [-15%, 15%]. Other secondary efficacy, safety, PK, and immunogenicity endpoints were measured through week 28. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-nine subjects were randomized to SB17, 254 to UST. Adjusted difference of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index change from baseline at week 12 of -0.6% (95% confidence interval; -3.780, 2.579) was within the equivalence margin. Physician's Global Assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index were also comparable. Overall treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable (SB17: 48.2%, UST: 48.8%). The overall incidence of antidrug antibodies up to Week 28 was 13.3% with SB17 and 39.4% with UST. LIMITATIONS: Data were only through week 28. CONCLUSION: SB17 was clinically biosimilar to UST up to week 28.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Psoriasis , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Ustekinumab , Humanos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Ustekinumab/administración & dosificación , Ustekinumab/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Dermatológicos/farmacocinética , Resultado del Tratamiento , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Inyecciones SubcutáneasRESUMEN
This study presents a safety analysis of infusion reactions (IRs) in gastric cancer patients who switched from reference trastuzumab to its biosimilar, trastuzumab-NK, at the Saitama Cancer Center in Japan from April 2018 to March 2022. IRs were identified if patients developed symptoms such as fever, chills, infusion-related reactions, hypersensitivity, rash, pruritus, urticaria, systemic disorders, or immune system disorders on the day of administration or the following day. The incidence of IRs was 14% in the reference trastuzumab group, 33% in the trastuzumab-NK group, and 33% in the switching group. There was no significant difference in IR incidence between the reference trastuzumab and trastuzumab-NK groups (p = 0.235). Among the switching group, only one of the three patients who experienced an IR had a reaction associated with the switch. These findings suggest that the frequency of IRs in the switching group gastric cancer is comparable to the other groups, indicating that switching is a viable treatment option with appropriate management. Additionally, 37 of the 45 patients in the study were male, provides new safety information on switching in gastric cancer for male patients that has not been previously reported.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Receptor ErbB-2 , Neoplasias Gástricas , Trastuzumab , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastuzumab/efectos adversos , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Japón , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Infusiones IntravenosasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study compared pharmacokinetics, symptomatic and endoscopic efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a subcutaneous formulation of the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 (CT-P13 SC) vs intravenous CT-P13 (CT-P13 IV) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, phase 1 study enrolled tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-naïve patients with active ulcerative colitis (total Mayo score 6-12 points with endoscopic subscore ≥2) or Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index 220-450 points) at 50 centers. After CT-P13 IV induction at Week (W) 0/W2, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive CT-P13 SC every 2 weeks (q2w) from W6 to W54 or CT-P13 IV every 8 weeks from W6 to W22. At W30, all patients receiving CT-P13 IV switched to CT-P13 SC q2w until W54. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of CT-P13 SC to CT-P13 IV for observed predose CT-P13 concentration at W22 (Ctrough,W22), concluded if the lower bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of geometric least-squares means exceeded 80%. RESULTS: Overall, 66 and 65 patients were randomized to CT-P13 SC and CT-P13 IV, respectively. The primary endpoint of noninferiority was met with a geometric least-squares means ratio for Ctrough,W22 of 1154.17% (90% CI 786.37-1694.00; n = 59 [CT-P13 SC]; n = 57 [CT-P13 IV]). W30/W54 clinical remission rates were comparable between arms. Other efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity assessments were also broadly comparable between arms, including after switching. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic noninferiority of CT-P13 SC to CT-P13 IV, and the comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity profiles, support the potential suitability of CT-P13 SC treatment in IBD. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02883452.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Administración Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Proteína C-Reactiva/efectos de los fármacos , Colitis Ulcerosa/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Crohn/metabolismo , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Heces/química , Femenino , Humanos , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Infliximab/sangre , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/efectos de los fármacos , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Trastuzumab is a biologic therapy indicated for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer and metastatic gastric cancer. Trastuzumab was originally approved as an intravenous (IV) formulation but has since been developed for subcutaneous (SC) administration for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Both formulations demonstrate generally comparable pharmacological and clinical profiles. Therefore, when deciding between treatment options, factors such as the route of administration, patient preference, value and cost must be considered. Studies comparing IV with SC trastuzumab indicate that each formulation offers unique advantages to patients depending on their individual needs. Concurrent with the development of SC trastuzumab, IV trastuzumab biosimilars comprise another treatment option that, in view of their reduced cost, might improve patient access and increase cost-effectiveness for healthcare providers and payers. In this review, we seek to raise awareness of the current options available for trastuzumab so that healthcare providers can optimally treat patients according to their individual situations and preferences.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Administración Intravenosa/economía , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas/economía , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Trastuzumab/economía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess non-inferiority of s.c. to i.v. CT-P13 in RA. METHODS: Patients with active RA and inadequate response to MTX participated in this phase I/III double-blind study at 76 sites. Patients received CT-P13 i.v. 3 mg/kg [week (W) 0 and W2] before randomization (1:1) at W6 to CT-P13 s.c. via pre-filled syringe (PFS) 120 mg biweekly until W28, or CT-P13 i.v. 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks until W22. Randomization was stratified by country, W2 serum CRP and W6 body weight. From W30, all patients received CT-P13 s.c. In a usability sub-study, patients received CT-P13 s.c. via auto-injector (W46-54) then PFS (W56-64). The primary endpoint was change (decrease) from baseline in disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28)-CRP at W22 (non-inferiority margin: -0.6). RESULTS: Of 357 patients enrolled, 343 were randomized to CT-P13 s.c. (n = 167) or CT-P13 i.v. (n = 176) at W6. The least-squares mean change (decrease) from baseline (standard error) in DAS28-CRP at W22 was 2.21 (0.22) for CT-P13 s.c. (n = 162) and 1.94 (0.21) for CT-P13 i.v. [n = 168; difference 0.27 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.52)], establishing non-inferiority. Efficacy findings were similar between arms at W54. Safety was similar between arms throughout: 92 (54.8%; CT-P13 s.c.) and 117 (66.9%; CT-P13 i.v.) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (from W6). There were no treatment-related deaths or new safety findings. Usability was similar for CT-P13 s.c. via auto-injector or PFS. CONCLUSION: CT-P13 s.c. was non-inferior to CT-P13 i.v. in active RA. The convenience of s.c. administration could benefit patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03147248.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/farmacocinética , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Live birth has increasingly been identified as the standard clinical approach to measure the success of medically assisted reproduction (MAR). However, previous analyses comparing biosimilar preparations of follitropin alfa versus the reference product (GONAL-f®, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany or GONAL-f® RFF; EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA), have had insufficient power to detect differences in clinically meaningful outcomes such as live birth. METHODS: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and clinical trial registries were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and conference abstracts comparing biosimilar follitropin alfa versus the reference product in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles published before 31 October 2020. Only studies in humans and publications in English were included. Retrieved studies were screened independently by two authors based on titles and abstracts, and then by full text. INCLUSION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing follitropin alfa biosimilar preparations with the reference product in infertile patients of any age, with any type of infertility for any duration, undergoing COS for the purposes of MAR treatment (including frozen cycles). The primary outcome was live birth. Combined data for biosimilar preparations were analysed using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: From 292 unique records identified, 17 studies were included in the systematic review, representing five unique RCTs that were included in the meta-analysis. Rates of live birth (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.71, 0.97; 4 RCTs, n = 1881, I2 = 0%), clinical pregnancy (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72, 0.94; 4 RCTs, n = 2222, I2 = 0%) and ongoing pregnancy (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.68, 0.96; 4 RCTs, n = 1232, I2 = 0%) were significantly lower with biosimilar preparations versus the reference product. Rates of cumulative live birth and cumulative clinical pregnancy were also significantly lower with biosimilars versus the reference product. There was high risk of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis included data from RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar follitropin alfa preparations and demonstrated lower probability of live birth and pregnancy (ongoing and clinical) in couples treated with biosimilar preparations compared with the reference product. This study provides more insight into the differences between biosimilar r-hFSH preparations and the reference product than previously reported. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: CRD42019121992 .
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Hormona Folículo Estimulante Humana/administración & dosificación , Infertilidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/normas , Femenino , Hormona Folículo Estimulante Humana/normas , Humanos , Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Infertilidad/epidemiología , Masculino , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo/tendencias , Proteínas Recombinantes/normas , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/normasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the implementation and uptake of biosimilar trastuzumab in Denmark compared with other European countries. METHODS: European data for usage of trastuzumab was supplied by IQVIA™, using the MIDAS® dataset. A comparison was performed based on market share estimated in sales volume. A separate comparison was undertaken between countries with a full two-fold switch between different biosimilars. Data was collected spanning the time from first registered sales of biosimilar trastuzumab until the 1st quarter of 2020. RESULTS: Denmark had the fastest and most thorough uptake of biosimilar trastuzumab compared with other EU countries. After 3 months, the market share of biosimilar trastuzumab had increased to 90% while the second fastest country had a 50% market share after 3 months. Only two other countries had undergone a full second switch between biosimilars, Hungary and Norway. All of the three countries made near complete switches between biosimilars while only Denmark had reduced the use of biooriginator below 10%. CONCLUSION: The implementation of biosimilar trastuzumab in Denmark was rapid and achieved high overall uptake compared with other EU countries. The switch from one biosimilar to another was also achieved quickly and thoroughly. We believe that the rapid dissemination of information and involvement of all stakeholders - administrators, pharmacies, prescribers, nurses, and patients - constitute the backbone of the Danish success. A similar strategy is recommend for biosimilar implementation in other countries.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Dinamarca , Europa (Continente) , HumanosRESUMEN
The efficacy of infliximab in treating rheumatoid arthritis depends on its serum trough concentration, which must be maintained at a minimum of 1 µg/mL to achieve the desired effects. However, Japan's National Health Insurance system does not cover tests for rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing treatment with biosimilar infliximab because its performance as a biosimilar remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the Remi-check Q qualitative assay yields comparable results for biosimilar infliximab and the originator product. Infliximab BS 100 "NK" and Remicade 100® were separately diluted in pooled human serum to yield test samples at the following concentrations: 0.30, 0.70, 1.20, and 3.00 µg/mL. Prepared samples were quantitatively assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and qualitatively using Remi-check Q, and the results obtained for the originator and biosimilar product were compared. For both originator and biosimilar infliximab, Remi-check Q yielded a negative result for all 0.30 and 0.70 µg/mL samples and a positive result for all 3.00 µg/mL samples. However, negative results were obtained with a fraction of the 1.20 µg/mL samples (biosimilar, 4/15; originator, 3/15). Concurrence rates between the results of quantitative ELISA and qualitative Remi-check Q analyses were comparable between originator and biosimilar infliximab at all tested concentrations. These results indicate that Remi-check Q yields comparable results for biosimilar infliximab and the originator product on being used as a qualitative assay for trough serum levels.
Asunto(s)
Bioensayo/instrumentación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/sangre , Monitoreo de Drogas/instrumentación , Infliximab/sangre , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Infliximab/farmacocinética , Infusiones IntravenosasRESUMEN
CT-P6 is a biosimilar of trastuzumab and is recommended to be administered for 30-90 min in subsequent maintenance infusions to prevent infusion-related reactions (IRRs). We administered CT-P6 for 30 min as the first injection and as an alternative to reference trastuzumab in the maintenance infusion and evaluated the safety of the administration. A total of 140 patients with breast or gastric cancer, who received a switch from tri-weekly reference trastuzumab to CT-P6 for 30 min in maintenance infusions, were retrospectively evaluated. Premedication was administered prior to an infusion of CT-P6 and a cytotoxic agent. However, premedication was not provided when CT-P6 was co-administered with pertuzumab or administered alone. The primary endpoint was the incidence of IRRs. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of diarrhea and skin toxicity. Ninety-five percent of the patients had breast cancer, and 44.3% had advance-stage cancer. The treatment included CT-P6 alone (17.9%) or with cytotoxic agents (23.6%), antihormonal drugs (25.7%), and pertuzumab (62.9%). Median administration time of trastuzumab at the switch was 13 administrations (range 2-140). Premedication was administered to 20.7% patients. One patient (0.7%) experienced grade 3 IRR. The frequency of diarrhea in the reference trastuzumab group and the CT-P6 group was 7.1 and 6.4%, respectively, and that of skin toxicity was 6.4 and 5.0%, respectively, without differences. In conclusion, we first demonstrated that an initial CT-P6 administration for 30 min during the switch from reference trastuzumab in maintenance infusion is an acceptable administration method.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of real-life clinical data for biosimilar etanercept, an anti-TNF blocking fusion protein. We describe the comparable efficacy and safety of originator and biosimilar etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a real-life clinical setting. Our data confirm that a biosimilar etanercept can be safely used as first-line treatment as well as in patients switched from a previous originator compound. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of originator and biosimilar etanercept in a cohort of RA patients attending two Italian hospitals. METHODS: The study involved 81 consecutive adult RA patients treated for at least 6 months with originator or biosimilar etanercept and considered their clinical and laboratory data, concomitant medications, and adverse events at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: Group 1 included 51 patients taking originator etanercept; group 2 included 30 taking biosimilar etanercept, including 19 who had been switched from the reference product. Despite a significant baseline difference in clinical disease activity, one-way analysis of variance showed that the two groups were clinically comparable after 6 months of treatment, and the same was true when only those receiving etanercept as first-line biological treatment were considered. Nine patients discontinued the treatment due to inefficacy or adverse events, which were never serious and were only reported in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety profiles of originator and biosimilar etanercept are comparable in RA patients in a real-life clinical setting. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Sustitución de Medicamentos/métodos , Etanercept , Prioridad del Paciente , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/sangre , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Sedimentación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Gravedad del Paciente , Seguridad del Paciente , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review covers recent publications relating to the use of biosimilar medicines in the supportive care of cancer patients, and broader publications focussed on the benefits and challenges of implementing biosimilars into clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: A metaanalysis and a number of systematic literature reviews have confirmed that the safety and efficacy of biosimilar versions of epoetin-α, filgrastim and infliximab are equivalent to those of their corresponding reference biologics. New guidelines have been issued concerning the interchangeability of biosimilars and the practice of substituting a biosimilar in place of a prescribed reference product. The introduction of biosimilars into a health system has been shown to improve patient access to treatment while also delivering cost savings, however, there are a number of barriers that can prevent or delay the adoption of biosimilars into clinical practice which must be overcome for the potential benefits of biosimilars to be realized. SUMMARY: There is a large amount of data to demonstrate that supportive care biosimilars are well tolerated and effective, with over 10 years of experience in Europe. We can learn from the challenges faced when introducing biosimilars into supportive care to facilitate the introduction of newer biosimilars into the treatment setting.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Fabry disease is a rare X-linked lysosomal disease, in which mutations in the gene encoding α-galactosidase A result in progressive cellular accumulation of globotriaosylceramide (GL-3) in various organs including the skin, kidney, and heart, often leading to life-threatening conditions. Enzyme replacement therapy is currently the standard therapy for the disease, to which two α-galactosidase A formulations have been approved: agalsidase α (Replagal®, Shire) and agalsidase ß (Fabrazyme®, Sanofi). We have recently developed a biosimilar of agalsidase ß, JR-051, and investigated its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to assess its bioequivalence to agalsidase ß. In a randomized phase I study, healthy adult male volunteers were treated with JR-051 or agalsidase ß and the pharmacokinetics of the drugs were compared. The ratio of geometric means (90% confidence interval [CI]) of the AUC0-24 and Cmax for JR-051 over agalsidase ß were 0.91 (0.8294, 1.0082) and 0.90 (0.7992, 1.0125), respectively. In a 52-week, single-arm, phase II/III study, patients with Fabry disease switched therapy from agalsidase ß to JR-051 to evaluate its pharmacodynamics. The mean (95% CI) plasma GL-3 concentrations at weeks 26 and 52 relative to pre-JR-051 administration were 1.03 (0.91, 1.15) and 0.96 (0.86, 1.06), respectively, which were within the pre-determined bioequivalence acceptance range (0.70, 1.43). The mean (95% CI) plasma globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-GL-3) concentrations at weeks 26 and 52 relative to pre-JR-051 administration were 1.07 (0.92, 1.23) and 1.13 (1.03, 1.22), respectively. Estimated glomerular filtration rate and left ventricular mass index, as renal and cardiac function indicators, showed no notable changes from baseline throughout the study period, and no new safety concerns were identified. In conclusion, these studies demonstrated bioequivalence of JR-051 to agalsidase ß in terms of its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. JR-051 offers a potential new treatment option for patients with Fabry disease.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Terapia de Reemplazo Enzimático/métodos , Enfermedad de Fabry/terapia , Glucolípidos/sangre , Esfingolípidos/sangre , beta-Galactosidasa/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Método Doble Ciego , Enfermedad de Fabry/enzimología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución Tisular , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: BCD-022 is a trastuzumab biosimilar which was shown to be equivalent to reference trastuzumab in a wide panel of physicochemical studies as well as preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo. International multicenter phase III clinical trial was conducted to comparatively assess efficacy and safety of BCD-022 and reference trastuzumab in combination with paclitaxel used as the therapy of metastatic HER2(+) breast cancer. Pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity were also studied. METHODS: Patients with no previous treatment for metastatic HER2(+) breast cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to BCD-022 or reference trastuzumab and were treated with trastuzumab + paclitaxel. Therapy continued for 6 cycles of therapy (every 3 weeks), until progression of the disease or unbearable toxicity. Primary study endpoint was overall response rate. Study goal was to prove equivalent efficacy of BCD-022 and reference trastuzumab. Equivalence margins for 95% CI for difference in overall response rates were set at [- 20%; 20%]. RESULTS: In total 225 patients were enrolled into the study, 115 in BCD-022 arm and 110 in reference trastuzumab arm. Overall response rate was 49.6% in BCD-022 arm and 43.6% in reference trastuzumab arm. Limits of 95% CI for difference of overall response rates between arms were [(- 8.05)-19.89%], thus, they lied within predetermined equivalence margins [- 20%; 20%]. Profile of adverse events was similar between groups (any AEs were reported in 93.81% of patients in BCD-022 arm and 94.55% of patients in reference arm). No unexpected adverse reactions were reported throughout the study. No statistically significant differences regarding antibody occurrence rate (either BAb or NAb) was found between BCD-022 (n = 3; 2.65%) and comparator (n = 4; 3.64%). Both drug products are characterized with low occurrence rate and short life of anti-trastuzumab antibodies. Pharmacokinetics assessment after 1st and 6th study drug injection also demonstrated equivalent PK parameters by all outcome measures: AUC0-504, СmÐ°Ñ , Тmax, T1/2. Analysis of Ctrough did not reveal any significant inter-group differences as well. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, results of this study have demonstrated therapeutic equivalence of trastuzumab biosimilar BCD-022 and referent trastuzumab drug. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Study Number NCT01764022 ). The date of registration was January 9, 2013.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Área Bajo la Curva , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Receptor ErbB-2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Trastuzumab/efectos adversos , Trastuzumab/farmacocinética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are prescribed sequentially in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Healthcare decision makers continue to debate their use, mainly because of their high costs. Our aim was to perform an economic evaluation for France of bDMARD sequences for treatment of moderate-to-severe RA after inadequate response or intolerance to conventional DMARDs (eg, methotrexate). METHODS: A discretely integrated condition event simulation was developed to track the course of patients from first bDMARD through switches to further lines in a sequence. The model included 11 events, 91 conditions, and 21 controlling equations. Inputs were obtained from a meta-analysis of clinical trials, a French registry, national drug lists, and databases. Survival, time with minimal activity, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and total costs were output. Structural and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Sequences starting with etanercept biosimilars (ETB) cost less, with ETB-abatacept-infliximab the least expensive: the mean lifetime discounted total cost was 116 912 per patient, with a mean of 11.166 QALYs. Most other strategies were dominated or led to small QALY gains (0.0008-0.0329). Only ETB-tocilizumab-abatacept made it onto the efficiency frontier, but at 955 778 per QALY gained. These results were confirmed in several scenarios and uncertainty analyses. CONCLUSION: Given minor differences in QALYs gained between bDMARD sequences with large cost differences, starting with biosimilars was more efficient than starting with branded products. Our model and findings should provide French and other decision makers with useful tools to address the challenges of comparing sequences of treatments for RA.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Modelos Económicos , Antirreumáticos/economía , Artritis Reumatoide/economía , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Francia , Humanos , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Metotrexato/economía , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the uptake of filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio), the first biosimilar to launch in the United States, in the Medicare Part B fee-for-service program from its launch in September 2015 to December 2017 and compare characteristics of patients and facilities that used filgrastim-sndz or originator filgrastim (Neupogen). METHODS: The 20% sample of Medicare Part B fee-for-service administrative claims data was used to extract information on claims for any filgrastim product between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. RESULTS: The utilization of filgrastim-sndz in Medicare Part B increased sharply between January and August 2016, surpassing filgrastim by November 2017, contributing to a 30% decrease in overall spending on this drug since 2015. Uptake was faster and larger in physician practices compared with hospital outpatient departments. About 77% of patients receiving filgrastim-sndz were new users. Utilization patterns indicated that product selection occurred at the facility level, rather than being at the discretion of the prescribing physician or driven by patient characteristics. CONCLUSION: Uptake of biosimilar filgrastim in the Medicare Part B program occurred despite multiple challenges to the adoption of biosimilars in the US market, suggesting that substantial potential savings could be generated by improving biosimilar uptake. Our findings indicated that physician practices and hospital outpatient departments have distinctive biosimilar uptake patterns. Thus policy makers aiming to contain Medicare Part B spending might consider focusing on incentivizing biosimilar uptake among hospital outpatient departments.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Hematológicos/administración & dosificación , Medicare Part B/economía , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Filgrastim/economía , Fármacos Hematológicos/economía , Humanos , Medicare Part B/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
During the National Congress of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology, which was held in Rome, Italy, October 2019, experts met to discuss advantages of febrile neutropenia prevention based on biosimilar G-CSF. This issue is of paramount importance in oncology as recent biological products may be of great benefit, provided that costs are sustainable.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/terapia , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/sangre , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/diagnóstico , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/etiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Italia , Recuento de Leucocitos , Neutrófilos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Aim: Present real-world data for rituximab (biosimilar and reference)-containing regimens in extrapolated indications in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients & methods: Data collected from office-based oncologic practices in Germany (July 2017-June 2019). Results: Of 1741 patients, 1241 had NHL; 500 had CLL. Of 7595 therapy cycles, 28.3% used reference rituximab; 55.2% used rituximab biosimilars; 2.0% used subcutaneous rituximab; 14.5% used rituximab, not otherwise specified. Rituximab biosimilars were used across all indications; 57.3% of cycles were administered in extrapolated indications. Over 24 months, the proportion of rituximab prescriptions that were for biosimilars increased from 12.0 to 83.0%. Conclusion: Our real-world data in NHL and CLL depicts increasing use of rituximab biosimilars across multiple treatment protocols, including extrapolated indications.