RESUMEN
Scientists are stepping up like never before to support science in the public arena. In big and small ways, scientists are adopting creative ideas to promote science.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Política , Ciencia , Actitud , Ciencia/economía , Ciencia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
As an Argentine scientist, the defunding of CONICET and INTA feels like a blow to progress and our future. Despite free education, these cuts force talented researchers to seek opportunities abroad. Argentina's history of scientific achievement, from Nobel Prizes to COVID-19 vaccines, is at risk. Defunding science weakens our ability to solve problems and compete globally.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Humanos , Argentina , Investigación Biomédica/economía , Investigación Biomédica/educación , Ciencia/economía , Ciencia/educación , Fuga de CerebrosAsunto(s)
Política , Ciencia , Ciencia/economía , Ciencia/organización & administración , Ciencia/normas , Ciencia/tendencias , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
Human achievements are often preceded by repeated attempts that fail, but little is known about the mechanisms that govern the dynamics of failure. Here, building on previous research relating to innovation1-7, human dynamics8-11 and learning12-17, we develop a simple one-parameter model that mimics how successful future attempts build on past efforts. Solving this model analytically suggests that a phase transition separates the dynamics of failure into regions of progression or stagnation and predicts that, near the critical threshold, agents who share similar characteristics and learning strategies may experience fundamentally different outcomes following failures. Above the critical point, agents exploit incremental refinements to systematically advance towards success, whereas below it, they explore disjoint opportunities without a pattern of improvement. The model makes several empirically testable predictions, demonstrating that those who eventually succeed and those who do not may initially appear similar, but can be characterized by fundamentally distinct failure dynamics in terms of the efficiency and quality associated with each subsequent attempt. We collected large-scale data from three disparate domains and traced repeated attempts by investigators to obtain National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants to fund their research, innovators to successfully exit their startup ventures, and terrorist organizations to claim casualties in violent attacks. We find broadly consistent empirical support across all three domains, which systematically verifies each prediction of our model. Together, our findings unveil detectable yet previously unknown early signals that enable us to identify failure dynamics that will lead to ultimate success or failure. Given the ubiquitous nature of failure and the paucity of quantitative approaches to understand it, these results represent an initial step towards the deeper understanding of the complex dynamics underlying failure.
Asunto(s)
Logro , Emprendimiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Organización de la Financiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Aprendizaje , Ciencia , Medidas de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Terrorismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Emprendimiento/economía , Organización de la Financiación/economía , Humanos , Invenciones , Inversiones en Salud/economía , Modelos Teóricos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Investigadores/psicología , Investigadores/normas , Investigadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciencia/economía , Medidas de Seguridad/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Successful scientific practice encompasses broader and more varied modes of investigation than can be captured by focusing on hypothesis-driven research. We examine the emphases that major US and UK funding agencies place on particular modes of research practice and suggest that funding agency guidelines should be informed by a more dynamic and multidimensional account of scientific practice.
Asunto(s)
Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto , Investigación/economía , Ciencia/economía , Guías como AsuntoRESUMEN
Scientists often misunderstand the role science plays and should play in policy making. Those misconceptions are captured well in the debate over whether Congress should recreate an Office of Technology Assessment (OTA).