Asunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto , Comunicación por Videoconferencia , Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Congresos como Asunto/normas , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Investigadores , Viaje , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normas , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/provisión & distribución , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Admisión y Programación de Personal/tendencias , Investigadores/organización & administración , Investigación/organización & administración , Teletrabajo/tendencias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Educación a Distancia/tendencias , Educación de Postgrado/tendencias , Humanos , Tutoría/tendencias , Investigación/educación , Investigadores/educación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Investigadores , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendencias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Huella de Carbono , Congresos como Asunto/economía , Humanos , Pandemias , Investigadores/economía , Investigadores/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has mandated rapid adoption of telehealth for surgical care. However, many surgical providers may be unfamiliar with telehealth. This study evaluates the perspectives of surgical providers practicing telehealth care during COVID-19 to help identify targets for surgical telehealth optimization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At a single tertiary care center with telehealth capabilities, all department of surgery providers (attending surgeons, residents, fellows, and advanced practice providers) were emailed a voluntary survey focused on telehealth during the pandemic. Descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U analyses were performed as appropriate on responses. Text responses were thematically coded to identify key concepts. RESULTS: The completion rate was 41.3% (145/351). Providers reported increased telehealth usage relative to the pandemic (P < 0.001). Of respondents, 80% (116/145) had no formal telehealth training. Providers estimated that new patient video visits required less time than traditional visits (P = 0.001). Satisfaction was high for several aspects of video visits. Comparatively lower satisfaction scores were reported for the ability to perform physical exams (sensitive and nonsensitive) and to break bad news. The largest barriers to effective video visits were limited physical exams (55.6%; 45/81) and lack of provider or patient internet access/equipment/connection (34.6%; 28/81). Other barriers included ineffective communication and difficulty with fostering rapport. Concerns regarding video-to-telephone visit conversion were loss of physical exam/visual cues (34.3%; 24/70), less personal interactions (18.6%; 13/70), and reduced efficiency (18.6%; 13/70). CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth remains a new experience for surgical providers despite its expansion. Optimization strategies should target technology barriers and include specialized virtual exam and communication training.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/organización & administración , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administración , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Comunicación , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Satisfacción Personal , Distanciamiento Físico , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Cirujanos/psicología , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/tendencias , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/tendencias , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
Electronic resources have changed surgical education in the 21st century. Resources spanning from digital textbooks to multiple choice question banks, online society meetings, and social media can facilitate surgical education. The COVID pandemic drastically changed the paradigm for education. The ramifications of Zoom lectures and online surgical society meetings will last into the future. Educators and learners can be empowered by the many available electronic resources to enhance surgical training and education.
Asunto(s)
Educación a Distancia/tendencias , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Cirugía General/educación , Internet/tendencias , Recursos Audiovisuales , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Cirugía General/tendencias , Humanos , Modelos Educacionales , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/tendencias , Sociedades Médicas/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasAsunto(s)
Dióxido de Carbono/análisis , Huella de Carbono/estadística & datos numéricos , Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Viaje/tendencias , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendencias , COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , Investigadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Red Social , Viaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/estadística & datos numéricosAsunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/economía , Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Infecciones por Coronavirus/economía , Pandemias/economía , Neumonía Viral/economía , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto , Sociedades Científicas/economía , Sociedades Científicas/organización & administración , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Ingeniería , Europa (Continente) , Gobierno Federal , Internacionalidad , Internet , Neurociencias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Estados Unidos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/economía , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasAsunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendencias , Presupuestos , COVID-19 , Huella de Carbono/estadística & datos numéricos , Congresos como Asunto/economía , Congresos como Asunto/normas , Humanos , Pandemias , Investigadores/organización & administración , Sociedades Científicas/economía , Viaje/tendencias , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/economía , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normasAsunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Investigadores/organización & administración , Investigación/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendencias , COVID-19 , Huella de Carbono/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Congresos como Asunto/economía , Personas con Discapacidad , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación/economía , Investigadores/economía , Red Social , Viaje/economía , Estados Unidos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
Overnight, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth rapidly transitioned from limited application to widespread implementation. The field of genetic counseling was well positioned to make this transition to virtual care since there is generally less of a need for patients to be seen in-person for physical exams or urgent care. Going forward, virtual visits will presumably become a mainstay in the provision of genetic services and it is anticipated that clinics will adopt "hybrid" models with both in-person and virtual visit options. This commentary highlights the successes and challenges in the rapid implementation of virtual visits, focusing on who has benefited versus who has been challenged or left behind. We also discuss genetic testing considerations, including the additional steps required for patients and clinicians when testing is ordered outside of the clinical setting, which can result in delays or a lack of testing altogether. Future research considerations are presented to address the needs among the most vulnerable and help ensure equitable access and benefit.
Asunto(s)
Asesoramiento Genético/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendencias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , PandemiasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Australian federal government introduced new COVID-19 psychiatrist Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth items to assist with providing private specialist care. We investigate private psychiatrists' uptake of video and telephone telehealth, as well as total (telehealth and face-to-face) consultations for Quarter 3 (July-September), 2020. We compare these to the same quarter in 2019. METHOD: MBS-item service data were extracted for COVID-19-psychiatrist video and telephone telehealth item numbers and compared with Quarter 3 (July-September), 2019, of face-to-face consultations for the whole of Australia. RESULTS: The number of psychiatry consultations (telehealth and face-to-face) rose during the first wave of the pandemic in Quarter 3, 2020, by 14% compared to Quarter 3, 2019, with telehealth 43% of this total. Face-to-face consultations in Quarter 3, 2020 were only 64% of the comparative number of Quarter 3, 2019 consultations. Most telehealth involved short telephone consultations of ⩽15-30 min. Video consultations comprised 42% of total telehealth provision: these were for new patient assessments and longer consultations. These figures represent increased face-to-face consultation compared to Quarter 2, 2020, with substantial maintenance of telehealth consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Private psychiatrists continued using the new COVID-19 MBS telehealth items for Quarter 3, 2020 to increase the number of patient care contacts in the context of decreased face-to-face consultations compared to 2019, but increased face-to-face consultations compared to Quarter 2, 2020.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Práctica Privada/tendencias , Psiquiatría/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Australia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Pandemias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Práctica Privada/organización & administración , Psiquiatría/organización & administración , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Teléfono/tendencias , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: During the UK Covid-19 lockdown, video consultations (telemedicine) were encouraged. The extent of usage, and to which concerns to earlier implementation were set aside, is unknown; this is worthy of exploration as data becomes available. SOURCES OF DATA: Sources of data are as follows: published case studies, editorials, news articles and government guidance. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Video can be clinically effective, especially where patients cannot attend due to illness or infection risk. Patients are positive, and they can benefit from savings in time and money. Adoption of telemedicine is hindered by a range of known barriers including clinician resistance due to technological problems, disrupted routines, increased workload, decreased work satisfaction and organizational readiness. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Despite policy impetus and successful pilots, telemedicine has not been adopted at scale. GROWING POINTS: Increased use of telemedicine during the Covid-19 crisis presents opportunities to obtain robust evidence of issues and create service transformation effectively. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Examination of telemedicine use during the Covid-19 crisis to ensure that the benefits and usage continue into the post-lockdown, 'new normal' world.
Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Consulta Remota , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Predicción , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Consulta Remota/métodos , Consulta Remota/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
The recent shutting down of in-person events owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has elevated the popularity of web-based conferencing. This development provides an opportunity for educators to test their teaching skills on what, for many, is a new platform. Many of the basic elements of what constitutes an effective presentation are the same regardless of whether they are delivered in person or online. However, there are advantages and disadvantages of each mode of presentation, and understanding how to best leverage the features of an online platform will lead to a better educational experience for the presenter and audience. The effectiveness of any presentation is dependent on the ability of the speaker to communicate with the audience. This is accomplished by including as much audience participation as possible. Many of the techniques used to encourage audience participation in person can be adapted for use in online presentations (eg, the use of features such as chat, hand raising, polling, and question-and-answer sessions). In any type of presentation, both the quality of the content and the oral delivery are important. The author reviews the common elements of an effective presentation and how they can be optimized for online platforms. ©RSNA, 2020.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Internet , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Radiología/métodos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Presentación de Datos , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Mercadotecnía , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Radiología/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Habla , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Smartphones can optimize the opportunities for interactions between nursing home residents and their families. However, the effectiveness of smartphone-based videoconferencing programs in enhancing emotional status and quality of life has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to evaluate of the effect of a smartphone-based videoconferencing program on nursing home residents' feelings of loneliness, depressive symptoms and quality of life. METHODS: This study used a quasi-experimental research design. Older residents from seven nursing homes in Taiwan participated in this study. Nursing homes (NH) were randomly selected as sites for either the intervention group (5 NH) or the control group (2 NH); NH residents who met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate. The intervention group was comprised of 32 participants; the control group was comprised of 30 participants. The intervention group interacted with their family members once a week for 6 months using a smartphone and a "LINE" application (app). Data were collected with self-report instruments: subjective feelings of loneliness, using the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale; depressive symptoms, using the Geriatric Depression Scale; and quality of life using the SF-36. Data were collected at four time points (baseline, and at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months from baseline). Data were analysed using the generalized estimating equation approach. RESULTS: After the intervention, as compared to those in the control group, participants in interventional group had significant decreases in baseline loneliness scores at 1 months (ß = - 3.41, p < 0.001), 3 months (ß = - 5.96, p < 0.001), and 6 months (ß = - 7.50, p < 0.001), and improvements in physical role (ß = 36.49, p = 0.01), vitality (ß = 13.11, p < 0.001) and pain scores (ß = 16.71, p = 0.01) at 6 months. However, changes in mean depression scores did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone-based videoconferencing effectively improved residents' feelings of loneliness, and physiological health, vitality and pain, but not depressive symptoms. Future investigations might evaluate the effectiveness of other media-based technologies in nursing homes as well as their effectiveness within and between different age cohorts.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/psicología , Soledad/psicología , Casas de Salud , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Teléfono Inteligente , Comunicación por Videoconferencia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/epidemiología , Familia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados no Aleatorios como Asunto , Casas de Salud/tendencias , Teléfono Inteligente/tendencias , Taiwán/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
Tele-neurology is a neurological consultation at a distance, or not in person, using various technologies to achieve connectivity, including the telephone and the internet. The telephone is ubiquitous and is a standard part of how we manage patients. Video consulting has been used for a long time in some centres, particularly in those where the geography means that patients have to travel long distances. Various technologies can be used, and with the development of various internet-based video-calling platforms, real-time video consulting has become much more accessible. We have provided a tele-neurology service in the North East of Scotland since 2006 using video conferencing with far-end camera control. More recently, we have complemented this using an internet-based platform (NHS Near Me). Here we outline the practicalities of video consulting in 'ordinary' times and comment on its use in the 'extraordinary' times of the coronavirus pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Examen Neurológico/tendencias , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendencias , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Humanos , Examen Neurológico/métodos , Examen Neurológico/normas , Neurología/métodos , Neurología/normas , Neurología/tendencias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Derivación y Consulta/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Escocia/epidemiología , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/normas , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normasRESUMEN
Show-Me ECHO, a state-funded project, provides access to education within a community of learners in order to optimize healthcare for the citizens of Missouri. Through videoconferencing and case-based review, ECHO shifts professional development from learning about medical problems in isolation to experiential learning as part of a multidisciplinary team. The establishment of a statewide COVID-19 ECHO is allowing a rapid response to this novel, unprecedented, and unanticipated health care crisis. There are many ongoing opportunities for clinicians from across the state to join a Show-Me ECHO learning community as a means to elevate their practice and improve ability to respond amidst a constantly evolving health care environment.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/tendencias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Neumonía Viral/terapia , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Humanos , Missouri , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasAsunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Investigadores/organización & administración , Ciencia , Viaje/tendencias , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendencias , Congresos como Asunto/economía , Difusión de Innovaciones , Humanos , Difusión de la Información , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Relaciones Interpersonales , Aplicaciones Móviles , Investigadores/psicología , Ciencia/organización & administración , Ciencia/normas , Viaje/economía , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/economía , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether clinical pharmacy specialist (CPS) services delivered using clinical video telehealth (CVT) is consistent with CPS services via face-to-face (FTF) visits in a cohort of patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition, the study aimed to evaluate the potential benefits for the patient with implementation of CVT services. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study. FTF services provided at a single community-based outpatient clinic (CBOC). CVT services provided at a main campus targeting the same CBOC. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (A1c > 7%) consulted for management by a CPS between April 2013 and October 2014 were included. The primary outcome was mean A1c reduction at 3 and 6 months. Secondary outcomes included time from consult placement to visit, average travel distance averted, and average travel time averted. RESULTS: Mean A1c reduction at 3 months was 1.096 ± 1.8 for FTF services before CVT (P ≤ 0.0001), 1.839 ± 1.7 for FTF services after CVT (P ≤ 0.0001), and 2.262 ± 2.8 (P = 0.0004) for CVT services. At 6 months, the mean A1c reduction was 1.202 ± 1.9 (P ≤ 0.0001), 1.965 ± 2 (P ≤ 0.0001), and 2.610 ± 3.8 (P = 0.0004). At 6 months there was no statistical difference between groups. The average time in days from consult placement to initial visit decreased from 106.3 ± 24.5 to 46 ± 35.3 (P ≤ 0.0001). The average travel distance in miles averted per patient was 99.5 ± 20.3, and the average travel time in hours averted was 1.6 ± 0.3. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes care provided by a CPS via CVT was as effective for the management of type 2 diabetes compared to FTF management by a CPS. Implementation of telehealth services increased access to providers as shown by the reduction in time from consult placement until initial visit.