Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 207
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(1): e14653, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37990976

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: New-onset allergic diseases, such as food allergy or atopic dermatitis, can develop after allogeneic transplantation. There are limited reports of new-onset atopic dermatitis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents, and its treatment is yet to be established. The pathogenesis may differ from typical atopic dermatitis in terms of alloimmunity including graft-versus-host disease. METHODS: We present five children and adolescents with new-onset atopic dermatitis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The characteristics and clinical profiles of skin treatment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are summarized. RESULTS: Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis included systemic tacrolimus for all patients. After hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, all patients achieved complete donor chimerism of the bone marrow and had acute graft-versus-host disease of the skin. After engraftment, all patients had skin lesions that met the international consensus diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis. None of the patients met the diagnostic criteria for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Topical therapy and skin care based on atopic dermatitis guidelines improved skin condition and atopic dermatitis severity scores in all patients. In addition, type 2 inflammatory markers improved accordingly. CONCLUSION: Topical therapy and skin care may be effective for transplant-related atopic dermatitis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. When extensive dermatitis is observed after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, this treatment may avoid excessive immunosuppressive therapy if it meets the diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Niño , Humanos , Adolescente , Dermatitis Atópica/terapia , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/efectos adversos
2.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(8): 85411s3-85411s10, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39093665

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the Nordic European Countries, cancer is the leading cause of death. The last decade has brought revolutionizing cancer treatments including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients on ICIs have a high risk of developing cutaneous immune-related adverse events. Treating these side effects is of high importance to improve patient's quality of life (QoL) and continue the anti-cancer treatment. METHODS: The Nordic European Cutaneous Oncodermatology Management (NECOM) project develops tools to prevent and treat cancer therapy-related cutaneous adverse events (cAEs). The first 2 NECOM papers presented various cAEs and skincare regimens involving hygiene, moisturization, sun protection, and camouflage products for preventing and managing cAEs. The NECOM 3 practical algorithm was on the prevention and treatment of acute radiation dermatitis. This NECOM 4 practical algorithm is intended to prevent and manage cutaneous immunotherapy-related adverse events (cirAEs), improving cancer patients' QoL and outcomes. RESULTS: The NECOM advisors discussed the results of a systematic literature review and obtained consensus on the evidence and expert opinion-based practical algorithm for cirAEs to support all healthcare providers treating cancer patients in the Nordic European Countries. The algorithm starts with a simple skincare regimen of cleansing, moisturizing, and protection, followed by the exclusion of severe cutaneous adverse reactions, and then specific interventions to treat the most common cirAEs (pruritus, maculopapular eruption, eczematous eruption, psoriasis, lichenoid eruption, and bullous eruption). CONCLUSIONS: CirAEs are the most common side effects induced by ICIs and may lead to cancer treatment interruption or even discontinuation. Patient education on the prevention of cirAEs using a skincare regimen and treatment recommendations given in the NECOM 4 algorithm may help prevent and manage cirAEs and improve the QoL and outcome of patients receiving ICIs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23:8(Suppl 2):s4-10.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias , Calidad de Vida , Cuidados de la Piel , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/terapia , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/administración & dosificación , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/prevención & control , Erupciones por Medicamentos/terapia , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos
3.
Contact Dermatitis ; 88(4): 286-293, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36621909

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Correct daily skin care is important regarding hand eczema (HE). However, only a few studies have evaluated the level of knowledge among hospital cleaners. OBJECTIVE: To examine the level of knowledge regarding skin protective behaviour and risk factors with respect to HE in hospital cleaners. METHODS: All cleaners working in four hospitals in Denmark were invited to participate in the study, which was based on a questionnaire consisting of 22 questions. RESULTS: 142 of 236 cleaners (response rate = 60.1%) were included. The mean of total correct answers were approximately five out of nine questions. 85.6% of participants evaluated themselves to have a low degree of knowledge of skin care and protection. Based on the number of correct answers, 90% were defined as having low knowledge. Being born or raised outside of Denmark was statistically significantly associated with lower level of knowledge. Risk factors for HE such as, work with wet hands, and use of household cleaning products were only recognized as risk factors by less than 50%. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that Danish hospital cleaners have a low degree of knowledge regarding skin care and protection. Cleaning workers born or raised outside of Denmark are in need of special attention.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Humanos , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Eccema/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos
4.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 36(1): 54-55, 2023 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36537776

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Up to 80% of individuals with an ostomy experience a peristomal skin complication, which can result in significant healthcare issues. All clinicians working with patients with stomas need to be aware of the signs and symptoms of peristomal skin complications and basic strategies to address the most common cause of skin complications: leakage of stool or other effluent onto the skin. Use of an evidence-based, standardized instrument to guide peristomal assessment and selection of appropriate interventions can improve patient outcomes and increase meaningful collaboration between all members of the healthcare team. This case study addresses dilemmas of care during a non-ostomy-related hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Estomía , Enfermedades de la Piel , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Humanos , Estomía/efectos adversos , Piel , Enfermedades de la Piel/complicaciones , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos
5.
Wound Repair Regen ; 29(1): 53-59, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32864766

RESUMEN

Frequent repositioning and skin examinations are the cornerstone of many pressure injury prevention programs. This study explores the hypothesis that frequent skin-exposing body care activities are protective against pressure injuries in residents of long-term care facilities. We designed a cross-sectional observational cohort study of 381 residents from 13 such facilities. Data were collected on resident characteristics and nursing care activities for each resident. We analyzed those data, looking for an association between skin-exposing body care and the presence of a pressure injury of stage 1 or greater. Body-exposing care activities were divided into high- and low-frequency groups. A logistic regression model was developed to include confounding variables. The odds ratio associated with body care and pressure injury was calculated. Fifteen percent of the residents in our study had pressure injuries. Confounders were activities of daily living score, heart failure, recent hospitalization, and stool incontinence. The adjusted odds ratio for body care as a risk factor was 4.9 (95% CI, 2.4, 10.4), indicating that residents with more than five body care needs are approximately five times more likely to have a pressure injury. Our results fail to support our hypothesis that frequent skin-exposing body care activities protect against pressure injury. Further exploration is needed to understand the resident characteristics and co-morbid conditions associated with the persistent risk for pressure injury despite frequent skin examinations.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Cicatrización de Heridas , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(12): 1258-1260, 2020 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346516

RESUMEN

“Hispanic” and “Latino” (also known as Mestizo) describe a diverse racial and ethnic group, with a range of cultures, languages, and biological ancestry. It includes individuals of Mexican, Central-to-South American, and Spanish-Caribbean (eg, Cuban, Puerto Rican, and Dominican) descent.1 Individuals of Hispanic/Latino race and ethnicity represent a heterogenous group of people with different skin tones and Fitzpatrick phototypes. Hispanic/Latinos are the fastest growing population in the United States (US) - projected to increase from 55 million in 2014 to 119 million in 2060, an increase of 115%.2 By 2060, more than one-quarter (29%) of the US is projected to be Hispanic/Latino.2.


Asunto(s)
Industria de la Belleza/estadística & datos numéricos , Cosméticos/normas , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados de la Piel/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Color , Cosméticos/administración & dosificación , Cosméticos/economía , Cosméticos/toxicidad , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Melanosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Cuidados de la Piel/economía , Preparaciones para Aclaramiento de la Piel/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones para Aclaramiento de la Piel/toxicidad , Pigmentación de la Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Estados Unidos/etnología , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas
7.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(12): 1209-1214, 2020 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346522

RESUMEN

Skin activities follow endogenous circadian rhythms resulting in differences between daytime and nighttime properties. To address the variations in skin needs, a novel circadian-based dual serum system (LVS) was developed. A 12-week, double-blind, randomized, regimen-controlled, multi-center study was conducted to assess the efficacy and tolerability of LVS on subjects presenting with moderate-severe photodamage. 61 Female subjects (36–65 years; Fitzpatrick skin types I–VI) completed the study. The active group received LVS (daytime serum and nighttime serum) and basic skin care regimen (moisturizer and SPF 35 sunscreen), while the control group received the basic skin care regimen only. In addition to clinical grading, subject self-assessment questionnaires, and standardized photography, punch biopsies were taken in a subset of subjects for immunohistochemistry. Additionally, swab samples were taken for skin surface oxidation analysis. Significant improvements over control were observed in the active group in Radiance (weeks 4, 8, and 12), Overall Photodamage, Tactile Toughness, and Global Fine Lines/Wrinkles (week 12). Biopsy results, skin swab analysis and standardized photographs support the clinical grading findings. At all follow-up visits, LVS was consistently highly rated over control by subjects, with a significant proportion of subjects agreeing at week 12 that LVS “improved the radiance of my skin,” and “improved the overall health and look of my skin”. Results from this study suggest that LVS may provide essential protective and reparative effects to skin exposed to the damaging effects of environmental factors, and also demonstrates the value of including skin circadian rhythm-based concepts in a topical skincare regimen. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(12): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5355.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Cronoterapia de Medicamentos , Envejecimiento de la Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Cutánea , Adulto , Anciano , Antioxidantes/efectos adversos , Biopsia , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Método Doble Ciego , Cara/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fotograbar , Fotoperiodo , Piel/diagnóstico por imagen , Piel/patología , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(11): 1069-1075, 2020 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33196748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acne is the most common dermatological disorder. An impaired barrier function in acne vulgaris has been reported, as well as decreased amounts of epidermal ceramides. Also, many of the systemic and topical medications prescribed for the treatment of acne exacerbate these skin barrier disruptions and can lead to irritation and dry skin conditions. AIM: The review explored the importance of maximizing adjunctive skincare, such as over-the-counter products for managing acne and avoiding adverse effects. METHODS: A literature review was conducted and included clinical acne guidelines, clinical studies, and review articles on acne prevention, treatment, and maintenance. Searches were made in PubMed and Google Scholar for English-language literature published between Jan 1, 2010, and Apr 1, 2020. Two clinicians manually reviewed selected publications. RESULTS: Seventy-four articles were included in the analyses. A variety of specialized cleansers and moisturizers are available as suitable adjunctive therapies for acne-prone skin. Lipid-free cleansers were found to be the most appropriate type of cleanser for acne-prone skin as they were associated with a low risk of skin irritation, and a near-physiological stratum corneum pH. Moisturizers typically included ingredients such as humectants, emollients, oil absorbers, and those with anti-inflammatory and/or barrier replenishing properties. Given the various adjunctive products available, decision frameworks were created for clinicians to use when selecting over-the-counter cleansers and moisturizers for acne-prone patients. CONCLUSION: Informing clinicians about skin barrier dysfunction in acne and the benefits of adjunctive skincare may help them to choose the right product(s) to complement prescription therapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(11): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5536.


Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Pérdida Insensible de Agua/efectos de los fármacos , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/efectos adversos , Emolientes/administración & dosificación , Emolientes/efectos adversos , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/efectos adversos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/efectos adversos , Piel/química , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(12): 1181-1183, 2020 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346506

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with sensitive skin find topical retinoid use for anti-aging purposes challenging due to irritation. Bakuchiol, a meroterpene from the Psoralea corylifolia seed, has retinol functionality through retinol-like regulation of gene expression. OBJECTIVE: This research examined the tolerability, efficacy, and barrier effects of a nature-based bakuchiol-containing cleanser and moisturizer in subjects with sensitive skin. METHODS: 60 female subjects Fitzpatrick skin types I–V age 40–65 years with sensitive mild to moderate photodamaged skin were enrolled in this 4 week study. A sensitive skin panel was constructed: 1/3 eczema/atopic dermatitis, 1/3 rosacea, 1/3 cosmetic intolerance syndrome. Subjects used a nature-based cleanser and moisturizer twice daily and underwent transepidermal water loss (TEWL), corneometry, tolerability assessments, and efficacy assessments at baseline, 5–10 minutes post-application, and week 4. RESULTS: The skin care products were well tolerated and efficacious (P<0.001) in terms of investigator assessed improvement in visual smoothness, tactile smoothness, clarity, radiance, overall appearance, and global anti-aging. Cheek corneometry measurements demonstrated a statistically significant 16% increase in skin moisture content (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: A bakuchiol nature-based anti-aging moisturizer is well tolerated and effective in individuals with sensitive skin.J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(12): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5522.


Asunto(s)
Cosmecéuticos/administración & dosificación , Emolientes/administración & dosificación , Fenoles/administración & dosificación , Envejecimiento de la Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/inmunología , Administración Tópica , Adulto , Anciano , Mejilla , Cosmecéuticos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatitis Atópica/inmunología , Emolientes/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenoles/efectos adversos , Rosácea/complicaciones , Rosácea/tratamiento farmacológico , Rosácea/inmunología , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/efectos de la radiación , Envejecimiento de la Piel/efectos de la radiación , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Pérdida Insensible de Agua/efectos de los fármacos , Pérdida Insensible de Agua/inmunología
10.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 48(6): 814-818, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32460993

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common skin disease among pediatric patients, which affects up to 20% of children worldwide. Characterized by pruritus and eczema, it is also associated with improper skin barrier function and allergen sensitization. Here, we aimed to assess the presence of haptens in emollients marketed in two European countries: in Poland and Spain, as, firstly, these products are considered to be AD's basic therapy, and, secondly, frequent application of potent sensitizers on atopic skin may result in contact dermatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched for moisturizers explicitly described as "Atopic skin care" products in the most frequently visited online pharmacies in Poland and Spain. Subsequently, we created a database of all products and compared their composition with 139 contact haptens listed in the European Baseline Series (EBS), Fragrance and Cosmetic Series. RESULTS: As of December 2018, our list comprised 159 and 111 emollients available on the Polish and Spanish markets, respectively. There were no ingredients listed in 28 (17.5%) products in Poland and 24 (21.6%) in Spain. Only 23 (17.5%) and 13 (14.8%) products were hapten free. The pattern of most common haptens was similar in both countries, including phenoxyethanol, tocopherol and tocopheryl acetate, undefined parfum in Poland and tocopherol, phenoxyethanol, tocopheryl acetate and undefined parfum in Spain. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a vast majority of products taken into consideration contain at least one potential contact hapten. These findings indicate a need for patient education about potentially allergenic ingredients and stronger cooperation between academia and cosmetic manufacturers.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Emolientes/análisis , Haptenos/análisis , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Cutánea , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Atópica/inmunología , Composición de Medicamentos/normas , Emolientes/efectos adversos , Emolientes/química , Emolientes/inmunología , Haptenos/efectos adversos , Haptenos/inmunología , Humanos , Polonia , Piel/inmunología , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , España
11.
BMC Biol ; 17(1): 47, 2019 06 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31189482

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Use of skin personal care products on a regular basis is nearly ubiquitous, but their effects on molecular and microbial diversity of the skin are unknown. We evaluated the impact of four beauty products (a facial lotion, a moisturizer, a foot powder, and a deodorant) on 11 volunteers over 9 weeks. RESULTS: Mass spectrometry and 16S rRNA inventories of the skin revealed decreases in chemical as well as in bacterial and archaeal diversity on halting deodorant use. Specific compounds from beauty products used before the study remain detectable with half-lives of 0.5-1.9 weeks. The deodorant and foot powder increased molecular, bacterial, and archaeal diversity, while arm and face lotions had little effect on bacterial and archaeal but increased chemical diversity. Personal care product effects last for weeks and produce highly individualized responses, including alterations in steroid and pheromone levels and in bacterial and archaeal ecosystem structure and dynamics. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may lead to next-generation precision beauty products and therapies for skin disorders.


Asunto(s)
Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Microbiota/efectos de los fármacos , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Cosméticos/clasificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Piel/química , Piel/microbiología
12.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(4): 1471-1480, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30343411

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of a product containing diosmin, coumarin, and arbutin (Linfadren®) in addition to complex decongestive therapy (CDT) on the management of patients with a breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: Fifty outpatients (average age of 56.2 ± 2.7 years, range 28-71) with a BCRL were enrolled for this study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either CDT consisting of skin care, manual lymphatic drainage, remedial exercises, and elastic compression garment (control group, n = 25) or CDT plus Linfadren® (study group, n = 25). Patients were evaluated before and after treatment and 3 months after the end of treatment. Primary outcomes were reduction of upper limb excess volume (EV) and percentage reduction of excess volume (%REV). Secondary outcomes were improvement in Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, and patient's perception of treatment effectiveness (PPTE). RESULTS: Addition of Linfadren® to CDT yielded an additional reduction of primary outcomes both after treatment (EV, - 521 ml vs. - 256 ml, P < 0.0001; %REV, - 66.4% vs. - 34%, P = 0.02) and at 3-month follow-up (EV, - 59 ml vs. + 24 ml, P < 0.0001; %REV, - 73.6% vs. - 31.4%, P = 0.004). Moreover, statistically significant differences were found between the two groups for the secondary outcomes after treatment (QuickDASH, P = 0.006; PPTE, P = 0.03) and at 3-month follow-up (QuickDASH, P = 0.006; PPTE, P = 0.02). No patient showed adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Linfadren® in addition to CDT was a safe and effective therapy for reducing BCRL and was better than CDT alone.


Asunto(s)
Arbutina/administración & dosificación , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/terapia , Cumarinas/administración & dosificación , Diosmina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Arbutina/efectos adversos , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/epidemiología , Terapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Vendajes de Compresión/efectos adversos , Cumarinas/efectos adversos , Diosmina/efectos adversos , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Drenaje/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/efectos adversos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masaje/efectos adversos , Masaje/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Extremidad Superior
13.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 18(12): 212, 2019 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31860221

RESUMEN

There was a time in the not so distant past that when we were asked about skin care, we would advise any patient to "use a moisturizer." This meant going to the local drug store and purchasing one of just a few hand or body lotions then on the market. Many of these were heavily scented and featured ingredients that we now know could actually damage the skin barrier and paradoxically dry the skin.


Asunto(s)
Inflamación/etiología , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Piel/metabolismo , Emolientes/administración & dosificación , Emolientes/efectos adversos , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Inflamación/patología , Piel/patología , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Piel/patología
14.
Contact Dermatitis ; 78(2): 151-158, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29152821

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sensitive skin is defined as a spectrum of unpleasant sensations in response to a variety of stimuli. However, only some skin care products provoke cutaneous symptoms in individuals with sensitive skin. Hence, it would be useful to identify products that could provoke cutaneous symptoms in individuals with sensitive skin. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether vehicles, as well as certain branded skin care products, can alter epidermal function following topical applications to normal mouse skin. METHODS: Following topical applications of individual vehicle or skin care product to C57BL/6J mice twice daily for 4 days, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) rates, stratum corneum (SC) hydration and skin surface pH were measured on treated versus untreated mouse skin with an MPA5 device and pH 900 pH meter. RESULTS: Our results show that all tested products induced abnormalities in epidermal functions of varying severity, including elevations in TEWL and skin surface pH, and reduced SC hydration. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that mice can serve as a predictive model that could be used to evaluate the potential safety of skin care products in humans with sensitive skin.


Asunto(s)
Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Atópica/etiología , Epidermis/efectos de los fármacos , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Administración Cutánea , Animales , Dermatitis Atópica/fisiopatología , Epidermis/fisiología , Femenino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL
15.
Wound Repair Regen ; 25(4): 558-563, 2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28805960

RESUMEN

The most common wound care procedures (WPCs) performed on open wounds are dressing changes and wound cleansing. Dressing changes cause moderate to severe pain in 74% of patients, nearly half (36%) of whom experience severe pain (rated as 8-10 on a 10-point numeric rating scale). The purpose of this paper is to propose a model of clinically accessible factors that can be tested in order to develop a clinical tool to identify which patients are likely to experience high intensity pain during nonoperative WCPs, such as dressing changes. Although multiple factors are known to be associated with pain, the factors selected for this model were limited to those that (1) are supported based on evidence and/or pain mechanisms and (2) are readily accessible to clinicians/practitioners and can be tested as a prediction tool to be used prior to WCPs. This model may be helpful to identify those likely to experience high intensity pain during WCPs. In this way, use of aggressive pain management strategies, including specialty dressings, pharmacologic analgesics, and/or non-pharmacological strategies, such as high intensity transcutaneous electrical stimulation.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Vendajes , Catastrofización/psicología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Cuidados de la Piel/psicología , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Heridas y Lesiones/psicología , Factores de Edad , Vendajes/efectos adversos , Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Curva ROC , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Cicatrización de Heridas , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
16.
Contact Dermatitis ; 76(1): 27-33, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27576564

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peristomal dermatitis is a common complication for the >700 000 patients in the United States with an ostomy. The role of stoma skin care products in peristomal dermatitis is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stoma skin care products as a cause of peristomal dermatitis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with peristomal dermatitis at four academic hospitals from January 2010 to March 2014 was performed. Patient demographics, clinical information and use test and patch test results were documented. RESULTS: Eighteen patients identified as having peristomal dermatitis were tested. Twelve of these had peristomal contact dermatitis. We identified numerous stoma skin care products as triggers of irritant and/or allergic contact dermatitis. The most common stoma skin care product used and/or involved in dermatitis was Cavilon™ No Sting Barrier Film. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support a paradigm shift whereby healthcare workers treating patients with peristomal dermatitis, which is currently considered to be a reaction mainly to bodily fluids, must consider those products used to protect the skin as potential triggers for this disease. Therefore, patients with peristomal dermatitis should be tested with their stoma skin care agents to determine the need for removal or change of these products. Additionally, full ingredient labelling by manufacturers would help identify new allergens and irritants.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Pomadas/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Crema para la Piel/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colostomía , Femenino , Humanos , Ileostomía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Derivación Urinaria
18.
Br J Dermatol ; 174(2): 371-9, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26480304

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Formaldehyde is a well-known contact sensitizer. Formaldehyde releasers are widely used preservatives in skincare products. It has been found that formaldehyde at concentrations allowed by the European Cosmetics Directive can cause allergic contact dermatitis. However, we still lack information on whether formaldehyde at low concentrations affects dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals. OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of low concentrations of formaldehyde on irritant contact dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals. METHODS: Fifteen formaldehyde-allergic individuals and a control group of 12 individuals without contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers were included in the study. The individuals performed the repeated open application test (ROAT) during 4 weeks with four different moisturizers releasing formaldehyde in concentrations that had been determined as > 40, 20-40, 2·5-10 and 0 p.p.m. by the chromotropic acid (CA) spot test. Dimethyloldimethylhydantoin was used as a formaldehyde releaser in the moisturizers. The ROAT was performed on areas of experimentally induced sodium lauryl sulfate dermatitis. The study was double blind, controlled and randomized. RESULTS: Nine of the 15 formaldehyde-allergic individuals had reappearance or worsening of dermatitis on the areas that were treated with moisturizers containing formaldehyde. No such reactions were observed in the control group (P < 0·001) or for the moisturizers without formaldehyde in the formaldehyde-allergic individuals (P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the low concentrations of formaldehyde often found in skincare products by the CA method are sufficient to worsen an existing dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Formaldehído/efectos adversos , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Colorimetría/métodos , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Cosméticos/química , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Formaldehído/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naftalenosulfonatos/metabolismo , Pruebas del Parche , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/análisis
19.
Br J Dermatol ; 175(4): 762-7, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26987767

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since its first description in 1994, frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) has become increasingly common, suggesting that environmental factors are involved in the aetiology. OBJECTIVES: To identify possible causative environmental factors in FFA. METHODS: A questionnaire enquiring about exposure to a wide range of lifestyle, social and medical factors was completed by 105 women with FFA and 100 age- and sex-matched control subjects. A subcohort of women with FFA was patch tested to an extended British standard series of allergens. RESULTS: The use of sunscreens was significantly greater in the FFA group compared with controls. Subjects with FFA also showed a trend towards more frequent use of facial moisturizers and foundations but, compared with controls, the difference in frequencies just failed to reach statistical significance. The frequency of hair shampooing, oral contraceptive use, hair colouring and facial hair removal were significantly lower in the FFA group than in controls. Thyroid disease was more common in subjects with FFA than controls and there was a high frequency of positive patch tests in women with FFA, mainly to fragrances. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an association between FFA and the use of facial skin care products. The high frequency of sunscreen use in patients with FFA, and the fact that many facial skin care products now contain sunscreens, raises the possibility of a causative role for sunscreen chemicals. The high frequency of positive patch tests in women with FFA and the association with thyroid disease may indicate a predisposition to immune-mediated disease.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia/inducido químicamente , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Cuidados de la Piel/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Preparaciones para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas del Parche , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Protectores Solares/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA