The Effect of ABCB1 and CES1 Polymorphisms on Plasma Levels of Dabigatran and Risk of Hemorrhagic Complications in Ischemic Stroke Patients.

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran directly inhibits thrombin and is used in primary and secondary stroke prevention in individuals with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The prodrug dabigatran etexilate is absorbed by enteral P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and then activated by hepatic and intestinal carboxylesterases (CES1) to produce active metabolites. Variations in dabigatran metabolism because of genetics may affect concentration levels and clinical outcomes. STUDY QUESTION: We conducted a study to assess how polymorphisms in the CES1 (rs2244613) and ABCB1 (rs4148738) genes affect the through plasma level (c min ) of dabigatran and its correlation to clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicentric study of consecutive patients on dabigatran therapy. Examination of CES1 rs2244613 and ABCB1 rs4148738 polymorphisms, c min 12 hours after administration, clinical follow-up (ischemic stroke, major or clinically relevant hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, other thromboembolism, and death). MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: A total of 432 patients received treatment for an average of 19.78 months (SD of 20.165). The sex distribution of the patients was 56.5% male, and the average age was 67.56 years (SD of 14.7). The ABCB1 variant genotype was present in 67.8% of patients, whereas 37.5% carried the CES1 polymorphism. RESULTS: Compared with wild-type patients, patients with the CES1 variant had significantly lower dabigatran plasma levels (with a mean difference of 16.986; 95% confidence interval, 5.794-28.178 ng/mL, P = 0.003). We also found a significant risk of major bleeding in patients carrying the ABCB1 rs4148738 allele (hazard ratio = 1.99, confidence interval 95% 1.10 to 3.59, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The CES1 variant genotype rs2244613 is closely linked with reduced c min of dabigatran. Carriers of the ABCB1 rs4148738 polymorphism exhibit a tendency toward higher plasma levels of dabigatran, which leads to a significantly increased risk of bleeding.

The Potentially Significant Role of CYP3A-Mediated Oxidative Metabolism of Dabigatran Etexilate and Its Intermediate Metabolites in Drug-Drug Interaction Assessments Using Microdose Dabigatran Etexilate.

Dabigatran etexilate (DABE), a double ester prodrug of dabigatran, is a probe substrate of intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) commonly used in clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. When compared with its therapeutic dose at 150 mg, microdose DABE (375 µg) showed approximately 2-fold higher in DDI magnitudes with CYP3A/P-gp inhibitors. In this study, we conducted several in vitro metabolism studies to demonstrate that DABE, at a theoretical gut concentration after microdosing, significantly underwent NADPH-dependent oxidation (~40%-50%) in parallel to carboxylesterase-mediated hydrolysis in human intestinal microsomes. Furthermore, NADPH-dependent metabolism of its intermediate monoester, BIBR0951, was also observed in both human intestinal and liver microsomes, accounting for 100% and 50% of total metabolism, respectively. Metabolite profiling using high resolution mass spectrometry confirmed the presence of several novel oxidative metabolites of DABE and of BIBR0951 in the NADPH-fortified incubations. CYP3A was identified as the major enzyme catalyzing the oxidation of both compounds. The metabolism of DABE and BIBR0951 was well described by Michaelis-Menten kinetics, with Km ranging 1-3 µM, significantly below the expected concentrations following the therapeutic dose of DABE. Overall, the present results suggested that CYP3A played a significant role in the presystemic metabolism of DABE and BIBR0951 following microdose DABE administration, thus attributing partly to the apparent overestimation in the DDI magnitude observed with the CYP3A/P-gp inhibitors. Therefore, DABE at the microdose, unlike the therapeutic dose, would likely be a less predictive tool and should be considered as a clinical dual substrate for P-gp and CYP3A when assessing potential P-gp-mediated impacts by dual CYP3A/P-gp inhibitors. SIGNIFICANT STATEMENT: This is the first study demonstrating a potentially significant role of cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of the prodrug DABE following a microdose but not a therapeutic dose. This additional pathway, coupled with its susceptibility to P-glycoprotein (P-gp), may make DABE a clinical dual substrate for both P-gp and CYP3A at a microdose. The study also highlights the need for better characterization of the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of a clinical drug-drug interaction probe substrate over the intended study dose range for proper result interpretations.

Assessment of the potential of the MET inhibitor tepotinib to affect the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A4 and P-gp substrates.

Tepotinib is a highly selective, potent, mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) inhibitor, approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. The aims of this work were to investigate the potential for drug-drug interactions via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5 or P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibition. In vitro studies were conducted in human liver microsomes, human hepatocyte cultures and Caco-2 cell monolayers to investigate whether tepotinib or its major metabolite (MSC2571109A) inhibited or induced CYP3A4/5 or inhibited P-gp. Two clinical studies were conducted to investigate the effect of multiple dose tepotinib (500 mg once daily orally) on the single dose pharmacokinetics of a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate (midazolam 7.5 mg orally) and a P-gp substrate (dabigatran etexilate 75 mg orally) in healthy participants. Tepotinib and MSC2571109A showed little evidence of direct or time-dependent CYP3A4/5 inhibition (IC50 > 15 µM) in vitro, although MSC2571109A did show mechanism-based CYP3A4/5 inhibition. Tepotinib did not induce CYP3A4/5 activity in vitro, although both tepotinib and MSC2571109A increased CYP3A4 mRNA. In clinical studies, tepotinib had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam or its metabolite 1'-hydroxymidazolam. Tepotinib increased dabigatran maximum concentration and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity by 38% and 51%, respectively. These changes were not considered to be clinically relevant. Tepotinib was considered safe and well tolerated in both studies. The potential of tepotinib to cause clinically relevant DDI with CYP3A4- or P-gp-dependent drugs at the clinical dose is considered low. Study 1 (midazolam): NCT03628339 (registered 14 August 2018). Study 2 (dabigatran): NCT03492437 (registered 10 April 2018).

Effects of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on midazolam and dabigatran pharmacokinetics in healthy participants.

AIMS: To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety after coadministration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone with midazolam (a cytochrome P450 3A4 substrate) and dabigatran (a P-glycoprotein substrate). METHODS: PK was studied in 2 phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence studies in healthy adults. Single oral doses of midazolam 2 mg (n = 12) or dabigatran 75 mg (n = 24) were administered alone and after steady state (i.e. ≥2 days) of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg and ritonavir 100 mg. Midazolam and dabigatran plasma concentrations and adverse events were analysed for each treatment. RESULTS: After administration of midazolam with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (test) or alone (reference), midazolam geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) increased 14.3-fold and 3.7-fold, respectively. Midazolam coadministered with ritonavir (test) or alone (reference) resulted in 16.5-fold and 3.9-fold increases in midazolam geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax , respectively. After administration of dabigatran with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (test) or alone (reference), dabigatran geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax increased 1.9-fold and 2.3-fold, respectively. Dabigatran coadministered with ritonavir (test) or alone (reference) resulted in a 1.7-fold increase in dabigatran geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax . Midazolam or dabigatran exposures were generally comparable when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone, with a slightly higher dabigatran Cmax with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir vs. ritonavir alone. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was generally safe when administered with or without midazolam or dabigatran. No serious or severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of midazolam or dabigatran with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir increased systemic exposure of midazolam or dabigatran. Midazolam exposures were comparable when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone, suggesting no incremental effect of nirmatrelvir. Dabigatran Cmax was slightly higher when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared with of ritonavir alone, suggesting a minor incremental effect of nirmatrelvir.

Safety of dabigatran etexilate for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in children.

This open-label, single-arm, prospective cohort trial is the first phase 3 safety study to describe outcomes in children treated with dabigatran etexilate for secondary venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention. Eligible children aged 12 to <18 years (age stratum 1), 2 to <12 years (stratum 2), and >3 months to <2 years (stratum 3) had an objectively confirmed diagnosis of VTE treated with standard of care (SOC) for ≥3 months, or had completed dabigatran or SOC treatment in the DIVERSITY trial (NCT01895777) and had an unresolved clinical thrombosis risk factor requiring further anticoagulation. Children received dabigatran for up to 12 months, or less if the identified VTE clinical risk factor resolved. Primary end points included VTE recurrence, bleeding events, and mortality at 6 and 12 months. Overall, 203 children received dabigatran, with median exposure being 36.3 weeks (range, 0-57 weeks); 171 of 203 (84.2%) and 32 of 203 (15.8%) took capsules and pellets, respectively. Overall, 2 of 203 children (1.0%) experienced on-treatment VTE recurrence, and 3 of 203 (1.5%) experienced major bleeding events, with 2 (1.0%) reporting clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events, and 37 (18.2%) minor bleeding events. There were no on-treatment deaths. On-treatment postthrombotic syndrome was reported for 2 of 162 children (1.2%) who had deep vein thrombosis or central-line thrombosis as their most recent VTE. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of dabigatran were similar to those in adult VTE patients. In summary, dabigatran showed a favorable safety profile for secondary VTE prevention in children aged from >3 months to <18 years with persistent VTE risk factor(s). This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02197416.

Assessment of the Potential for Veverimer Drug-Drug Interactions.

Veverimer is a polymer being developed as a potential treatment of metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Veverimer selectively binds and removes hydrochloric acid from the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in an increase in serum bicarbonate. Veverimer is not systemically absorbed, so potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are limited to effects on the absorption of other oral drugs through binding to veverimer in the gastrointestinal tract or increases in gastric pH caused by veverimer binding to hydrochloric acid. In in vitro binding experiments using a panel of 16 test drugs, no positively charged, neutral, or zwitterionic drugs bound to veverimer. Three negatively charged drugs (furosemide, aspirin, ethacrynic acid) bound to veverimer; however, this binding was reduced or eliminated in the presence of normal physiologic concentrations (100-170 mM) of chloride. Veverimer increased gastric pH in vivo by 1.5-3 pH units. This pH elevation peaked within 1 hour and had returned to baseline after 1.5-3 hours. Omeprazole did not alter the effect of veverimer on gastric pH. The clinical relevance of in vitro binding and the transient increase in gastric pH was evaluated in human DDI studies using two drugs with the most binding to veverimer (furosemide, aspirin) and two additional drugs with pH-dependent solubility effecting absorption (dabigatran, warfarin). None of the four drugs showed clinically meaningful DDI with veverimer in human studies. Based on the physicochemical characteristics of veverimer and results from in vitro and human studies, veverimer is unlikely to have significant DDIs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Patients with chronic kidney disease, who are usually on many drugs, are vulnerable to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The potential for DDIs with veverimer was evaluated based on the known site of action and physicochemical structure of the polymer, which restricts the compound to the gastrointestinal tract. Based on the findings from in vitro and human studies, we conclude that veverimer is unlikely to have clinically significant DDIs.

Direct oral anticoagulant safety during breastfeeding: a narrative review.

PURPOSE: There are limited data regarding the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) during breastfeeding. The aim of the present study is to investigate the extent of excretion of DOACs into human milk according to the available clinical and experimental studies. METHODS: On 16th January 2021, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for all studies which investigated DOACs in breastfeeding without any time frame and language limitation. Search keywords were [breastfeeding, breast feeding, breastfed, lactation, milk secretion OR milk] AND [apixaban OR Eliquist OR rivaroxaban OR Xarelto OR edoxaban OR Savaysa OR dabigatran OR Pradaxa OR dabigatran etexilate OR dabigatran etexilate mesylate OR direct oral anticoagulant OR DOAC OR new oral anticoagulant OR NOAC]. Finally, we identified six articles which reported DOAC use during breastfeeding or lactation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: According to the available limited data, dabigatran has the least excretion in human breast milk. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran both have acceptable milk excretion cutoffs, whereas apixaban milk excretion is greater than the maximum allowed range. Further well-designed studies with larger sample sizes are required to generate consistent comparable data and clarify benefits and risks of each DOAC during breastfeeding.

Antithrombotic Treatment of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: RE-SPECT ESUS Elderly and Renally Impaired Subgroups.

Background and Purpose- The RE-SPECT ESUS trial (Randomized, Double-Blind, Evaluation in Secondary Stroke Prevention Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) tested the hypothesis that dabigatran would be superior to aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. This exploratory subgroup analysis investigates the impact of age, renal function (both predefined), and dabigatran dose (post hoc) on the rates of recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Methods- RE-SPECT ESUS was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of dabigatran 150 or 110 mg (for patients aged ≥75 years and/or with creatinine clearance 30 to <50 mL/minute) twice daily compared with aspirin 100 mg once daily. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke. Results- The trial, which enrolled 5390 patients from December 2014 to January 2018, did not demonstrate superiority of dabigatran versus aspirin for prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. However, among the population qualifying for the lower dabigatran dose, the rate of recurrent stroke was reduced with dabigatran versus aspirin (7.4% versus 13.0%; hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.39-0.82]; interaction P=0.01). This was driven mainly by the subgroup aged ≥75 years (7.8% versus 12.4%; hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.43-0.94]; interaction P=0.10). Stroke rates tended to be lower with dabigatran versus aspirin with declining renal function. Risks for major bleeding were similar between treatments, irrespective of renal function, but with a trend for lower bleeding rates with dabigatran versus aspirin in older patients. Conclusions- In subgroup analyses of RE-SPECT ESUS, dabigatran reduced the rate of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin in patients qualifying for the lower dose of dabigatran. These results are hypothesis-generating. Aspirin remains the standard antithrombotic treatment for patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02239120.

Ecarin based coagulation testing.

Ecarin is derived from venom of Echis carinatus, and will activate prothrombin into meizothrombin which will then cleave fibrinogen to result in clot formation. Ecarin based testing has been described for decades, but these assays were typically restricted to reference or speciality coagulation laboratories. This test was initially described for the assessment of direct thrombin inhibitors (eg, bivalirudin lepirudin, or argatroban) and was not affected by heparins or heparinoids. Ecarin based assays were rarely used for anticoagulation monitoring until the emergence of the direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in 2010. As this test was mentioned in the prescribing information for dabigatran etexilate, there was increased interest for use by clinical laboratories as the preferred method for assessing the anticoagulant effect of this drug. The purpose of this document is to review the current status of ecarin based assays for assessing dabigatran. This is with the understanding that these methods can also be exploited for determining the anticoagulation effect of parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors, such as argatroban and bivalirudin.

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Factors Influencing the Ischemic and Bleeding Risk in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Current Evidence.

ABSTRACT: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are a widely prescribed treatment to prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and a therapy and preventative measure to prevent recurrences following venous thromboembolism. Optimal use of NOACs requires a thorough knowledge of the pharmacology of these drugs, as well as an understanding of patient factors affecting their use. The 4 NOACs-dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are available in a range of doses suitable for differing indications and with a variety of dose reduction criteria. Identification of the correct dose is one of the key challenges in the individualization of treatment. Elderly patients with atrial fibrillation are at a greater risk of both ischemic and bleeding events than younger patients. Consequently, it is essential to achieve balance in anticoagulation strategies. Medication adherence to NOACs is important for safe and effective treatment, particularly in elderly populations. A growing body of evidence shows that once-daily dosing improves adherence and persistence to therapy, without having an impact on bleeding risk.

Effect of Bisoprolol on the Level of Dabigatran.

BACKGROUND: Many patients receiving dabigatran treatment might also require bisoprolol therapy. However, there is a possibility that bisoprolol as significant P-glycoprotein inhibitor might interact with dabigatran. STUDY QUESTION: To investigate the impact of concomitant bisoprolol therapy on dabigatran plasma level in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. STUDY DESIGN: A pilot drug interaction study in 29 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation on dabigatran therapy. Bisoprolol was administrated in 18 patients. Blood samples were collected at baseline (in the morning, before any medication was administered) and at hour 2 (2 hours after administration of dabigatran and bisoprolol). RESULTS: The dabigatran plasma level was significantly higher at baseline and at hour 2 in patients treated with bisoprolol compared with patients without bisoprolol therapy. In addition, we have shown that this increase is affected by dabigatran dosage and concomitant treatment with proton-pump inhibitor and digoxin. The impact of bisoprolol on dabigatran concentration was still significant despite these confounders. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the interaction between dabigatran and bisoprolol, which is modulated with dabigatran dosage and concomitant treatment with proton-pump inhibitor and digoxin.

Monitoring of low dabigatran concentrations: diagnostic performance at clinically relevant decision thresholds.

The direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran does not require therapeutic drug monitoring, however emergency measurements are gaining importance. Current assays feature good performance at intermediate and high dabigatran concentrations but show limited accuracy at low concentrations. This area requires more attention as clinical decision threshold values currently lie at 30 and 50 ng/ml. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare diagnostic performance of dabigatran assays at these thresholds. Dabigatran concentrations of 293 plasma samples taken from 50 patients were measured with the INNOVANCE direct thrombin inhibitor assay (DTI) from Siemens, the Biophen direct thrombin inhibitor assay (BDTI), the BDTI using a low range calibrator (BDTI-low), the Hemoclot direct thrombin inhibitor assay (HTI) and an ecarin clotting time assay (ECT). Assay results were compared to ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS), and test characteristics were calculated for thresholds of 30 and 50 ng/ml. DTI, BDTI-low and ECT showed very strong correlation and high agreement with UPLC-MS/MS and an improved determination of low dabigatran concentrations. ROC curve analyses revealed very high accuracy at the 30/50 ng/ml thresholds for DTI (AUC = 0.989/0.995), BDTI-low (AUC = 0.980/0.991) and ECT (AUC = 0.990/0.996) measurements. Sensitivity and specificity in detecting were calculated for DTI (98/92%), BDTI-low (87/95%), ECT (97/96%), BDTI (99/82%) and HTI (86/89%) measurements. Compared to the previously available HTI and BDTI, both novel assays, DTI and BDTI-low, reliably determine low dabigatran plasma concentrations around the clinical decision thresholds with very high sensitivity and specificity.

Renal Excretion of Dabigatran: The Potential Role of Multidrug and Toxin Extrusion (MATE) Proteins.

Following oral administration, dabigatran etexilate (DABE) is rapidly hydrolyzed to its active form, dabigatran. DABE, but not dabigatran, presents as a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate and has increasingly been used as a probe drug. Therefore, although dosed as DABE, a P-gp drug-drug interaction (DDI) is reported as a dabigatran plasma concentration ratio (perpetrator versus placebo). Because the majority of a DABE dose (80 to 85%) is recovered in urine as unchanged dabigatran (renal active secretion is ∼25% of total clearance), dabigatran was evaluated in vitro as a substrate of various human renal transporters. Active (pyrimethamine-sensitive) dabigatran uptake was observed with human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells expressing multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 (MATE1) and 2K (MATE2K), with Michaelis-Menten constant (Km) values of 4.0 and 8.0 µM, respectively. By comparison, no uptake of 2 µM dabigatran (versus mock-transfected HEK293 cells) was evident with HEK293 cells transfected with organic cation transporters (OCT1 and OCT2) and organic anion transporters (OAT1, 2, 3, and 4). The efflux ratios of dabigatran across P-gp- and BCRP (breast cancer resistance protein)-MDCK (Madin-Darby canine kidney) cell monolayers were 1.5 and 2.0 (versus mock-MDCK cell monolayers), suggesting dabigatran is a relatively poor P-gp and BCRP substrate. Three of five drugs (verapamil, ketoconazole, and quinidine) known to interact clinically with dabigatran, as P-gp inhibitors, presented as MATE inhibitors in vitro (IC50 = 1.0 to 25.2 µM). Taken together, although no basolateral transporter was identified for dabigatran, the results suggest that apical MATE1 and MATE2K could play an important role in its renal clearance. MATE-mediated renal secretion of dabigatran needs to be considered when interpreting the results of P-gp DDI studies following DABE administration.

Incidence of direct oral anticoagulant use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and characteristics of users in 6 European countries (2008-2015): A cross-national drug utilization study.

AIMS: To estimate the incidence of direct oral anticoagulant drug (DOAC) use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and to describe user and treatment characteristics in 8 European healthcare databases representing 6 European countries. METHODS: Longitudinal drug utilization study from January 2008 to December 2015. A common protocol approach was applied. Annual period incidences and direct standardisation by age and sex were performed. Dose adjustment related to change in age and by renal function as well as concomitant use of potentially interacting drugs were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 186 405 new DOAC users (age ≥18 years) were identified. Standardized incidences varied from 1.93-2.60 and 0.11-8.71 users/10 000 (2011-2015) for dabigatran and rivaroxaban, respectively, and from 0.01-8.12 users/10 000 (2012-2015) for apixaban. In 2015, the DOAC incidence ranged from 9 to 28/10 000 inhabitants in SIDIAP (Spain) and DNR (Denmark) respectively. There were differences in population coverage among the databases. Only 1 database includes the total reference population (DNR) while others are considered a population representative sample (CPRD, BIFAP, SIDIAP, EGB, Mondriaan). They also varied in the type of drug data source (administrative, clinical). Dose adjustment ranged from 4.6% in BIFAP (Spain) to 15.6% in EGB (France). Concomitant use of interacting drugs varied between 16.4% (SIDIAP) and 70.5% (EGB). Cardiovascular comorbidities ranged from 25.4% in Mondriaan (The Netherlands) to 82.9% in AOK Nordwest (Germany). CONCLUSION: Overall, apixaban and rivaroxaban increased its use during the study period while dabigatran decreased. There was variability in patient characteristics such as comorbidities, potentially interacting drugs and dose adjustment. (EMA/2015/27/PH).

The Impact of Proton Pump Inhibition on Dabigatran Levels in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibition (PPI) administrated together with dabigatran reduces the risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. However, there is a discussion regarding possible PPI-dabigatran interaction that may reduce the efficacy of this therapy. STUDY QUESTION: To determine the impact of concomitant PPI on dabigatran plasma levels in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NV-AF). STUDY DESIGN: A pilot prospective study in patients with NV-AF on dabigatran therapy was performed; 31 patients were enrolled. PPI with either omeprazole or pantoprazole was administrated in 19 patients. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Blood samples were taken for the assessment of the dabigatran trough and peak levels. Dabigatran concentration was measured with the Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor Assay. RESULTS: There were significant differences in dabigatran trough level comparing patients treated with PPI and patients without PPI (58.86 ± 36.76 ng/mL vs. 110.72 ± 88.47 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Similarly, there were significant differences in dabigatran peak level between compared groups (88.0 ± 20.5 ng/mL vs. 174.4 ± 139.64 ng/mL, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated the interaction between PPI and dabigatran levels in patients with NV-AF.

Pharmacokinetics of anticoagulants apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban in elderly Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation treated in one general hospital.

Steady-state plasma concentrations of anticoagulants and the time since the previous administration in mainly outpatients with atrial fibrillation administered standard or reduced doses were analyzed for 110 elderly Japanese subjects (mean age, 76 years) treated with apixaban (2.5 or 5.0 mg twice daily), dabigatran etexilate (110 or 150 mg twice daily), edoxaban (30 or 60 mg once daily) or rivaroxaban (10 or 15 mg once daily) at one general hospital. The pharmacokinetics in patients treated with standard and reduced doses of the four anticoagulants using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was compared with the concentration ranges estimated using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Reduced doses of anticoagulants resulted in relatively small pharmacokinetic variations compared with the standard dose. Statistical analyses revealed that renal impairment is likely not the sole determinant factor for high plasma concentrations of apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban. Patients with atrial fibrillation should be treated with the correct doses of oral anticoagulants as specified in the package inserts (e.g. reduced doses for elderly patients, patients with low body weights and in combination with P-glycoprotein inhibitor drugs) to avoid excessive or insufficient doses of direct oral anticoagulants.

Irinotecan-induced gastrointestinal damage impairs the absorption of dabigatran etexilate.

Irinotecan causes serious gastrointestinal damage. Dabigatran etexilate (DABE), an oral anticoagulant and substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), is poorly absorbed and exhibits low bioavailability in humans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of irinotecan-induced gastrointestinal damage on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of DABE. Irinotecan was administered intravenously to rats for 4 days to induce gastrointestinal damage. To investigate the PK profile of dabigatran (DAB), an active moiety of DABE, DABE was administered orally on day 5, and then DAB was administered intravenously on day 6. To evaluate the PD profile of DAB, the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was measured. The protein expression level of intestinal P-gp was evaluated. In the irinotecan-treated rats, the area under the concentration-time curve of DAB after the oral administration of DABE and the bioavailability of DABE were decreased significantly. The APTT ratio also decreased, suggesting that the impaired efficacy of DABE was attributable to a reduction in its bioavailability. The expression of intestinal P-gp was higher in the irinotecan-treated rats. Taking into consideration the histological damage caused to the intestinal epithelium, both the increased P-gp expression and the reduced passive diffusion were considered to be responsible for the reduction in the bioavailability of DABE.

Anticoagulant Activities of Indobufen, an Antiplatelet Drug.

Indobufen is a new generation of anti-platelet aggregation drug, but studies were not sufficient on its anticoagulant effects. In the present study, the anticoagulant activity of indobufen was determined by monitoring the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), and thrombin time (TT) in rabbit plasma. We evaluated the anticoagulant mechanisms on the content of the platelet factor 3,4 (PF3,4), and the coagulation factor 1, 2, 5, 8, 10 (FI, II, V, VIII, X) in rabbits, as well as the in vivo bleeding time and clotting time in mice. The pharmacodynamic differences between indobufen and warfarin sodium, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran were further studied on thrombus formation and the content of FII and FX in rats. Animal experiments showed that intragastric-administrated indobufen can significantly reduce the APTT, PT, TT, PF3, FI, II, V, VIII, and X plasma contents. Its inhibitory effect on plasma FII was better than thrombin inhibitor dabigatran with effect on FX better than FXa inhibitor rivaroxaban. These results suggest that indobufen has some anticoagulant effects as strong as some conventional anticoagulants. The mechanism may be related to both exogenous and endogenous coagulation system.

[Pathogenesis and prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolic events in patients after deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities]. / Patogenez i profilaktika venoznykh i arterial'nykh tromboémbolii u bol'nykh, perenesshikh tromboz glubokikh ven nizhnikh konechnostei.

AIM: To define the role of thrombophilic and other procoagulant conditions in pathogenesis of deep vein thrombosis and the effectiveness of pathogenetic secondary prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolic events. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 107 patients for the period 2007-2016 who were divided into 3 groups. The main group (n=40) - lifelong individual antithrombotic therapy with warfarin predominantly; the second (control) group (n=39) - warfarin administration for 3-6 months; the third (additional) group (n=28) - specific life-long therapy depending on procoagulant status which was assessed according to original scale. The main anticoagulants were rivoroxaban or dabigatran etexilate. Recurrent venous thromboembolic complications (RVTE) were observed in one (2.5%) patient of the first group and in 8 (20.5%) cases of the second group. In the third group RVTE were absent (significant differences, p<0.03 and 0.001, respectively). Arterial thromboembolic diseases were noted in 1 (2.5%) patient of the first group, in 4 (10.25%) cases of the second group and in none of the third group (significantly only for group II vs. group III, p<0.01). RESULTS: Individual antithrombotic therapy reduces the incidence of recurrent venous and arterial thromboembolic events in patients with idiopathic deep vein thrombosis.

Differential Influence of the Antiretroviral Pharmacokinetic Enhancers Ritonavir and Cobicistat on Intestinal P-Glycoprotein Transport and the Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Disposition of Dabigatran.

Dabigatran etexilate (DE) is a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) probe substrate, and its active anticoagulant moiety, dabigatran, is a substrate of the multidrug and toxin extrusion protein-1 (MATE-1) transporter. The antiretroviral pharmacokinetic enhancers, ritonavir and cobicistat, inhibit both these transporters. Healthy volunteers received single doses of DE at 150 mg alone, followed by ritonavir at 100 mg or cobicistat at 150 mg daily for 2 weeks. DE was then given 2 h before ritonavir or cobicistat. One week later, DE was given simultaneously with ritonavir or cobicistat. No significant increases in dabigatran pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure or thrombin time (TT) measures were observed with the simultaneous administration of ritonavir. Separated administration of ritonavir resulted in a mean decrease in dabigatran PK exposure of 29% (90% confidence interval [CI], 18 to 40%) but did not significantly change TT measures. However, cobicistat increased dabigatran PK exposure (area under the concentration-versus-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum plasma concentration) by 127% each (90% CI, 81 to 173% and 59 to 196%, respectively) and increased TT measures (33% for the area-under-the-effect curve from time zero to 24 h [90% CI, 22 to 44%] and 51% for TT at 24 h [90% CI, 22 to 78%]) when given simultaneously with dabigatran. Similar increases were observed when cobicistat was administered separately by 2 h from the administration of dabigatran. In all comparisons, no significant increase in the dabigatran elimination half-life was observed. Therefore, it is likely safe to coadminister ritonavir with DE, while there is a potential need for reduced dosing and prudent clinical monitoring with the coadministration of cobicistat due to the greater net inhibition of intestinal P-gp transport and increased bioavailability. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01896622.).