High Fracture Rate of AVANTA Silicone Implant Following Arthroplasty of the Thumb MCP Joint of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Boutonniere Deformities.

We retrospectively investigated the mid-term outcomes of arthroplasty using the AVANTA silicone implant for thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints with boutonniere deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study involved 36 thumbs of 33 RA patients with a mean follow-up period of 5.1 years (range, 2.0-13.3). Postoperatively, the mean extension was significantly increased and the mean flexion was significantly decreased (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively), resulting in the mean arc of range of motion (ROM) shifting in the direction of extension after surgery. Implant fracture was observed in 10 thumbs (28%), and 4 of these (11%) underwent revision surgery. The survivorship with implant fracture and revision surgery as endpoints were 73.4% and 91.8% at 5 years, respectively. The preoperative arc of ROM and the postoperative flexion range of the implant-fracture group were significantly greater than those in the no-implant-fracture group (p=0.039, 0.034, respectively). These results suggest the importance of patient education and careful rehabilitation to prevent excessive flexion. Overall, the AVANTA silicone implant showed a relatively high rate of implant fracture at our institute.

Quick and safe: why a k-wire-extension-block-fixation of a bony mallet finger is the favoured treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Mallet fingers are the most common tendon injuries of the hand. Bony avulsion distal finger extensor tendon ruptures causing a mallet finger require special attention and management. In this monocentral study, we analyzed the clinical and individual outcomes succeeding minimal invasive k-wire extension block treatment of bony mallet fingers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, we sent a self-designed template and a QUICK-DASH score questionnaire to all patients, who were treated because of a bony mallet finger between 2009 and 2022 and fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 244 requests were sent out. 72 (29.5%) patients participated in the study. Forty-five men and twenty-seven women were included. RESULTS: 98.7% (n = 75) of the cases were successfully treated. Patients were highly satisfied with the treatment (median 8.0; SD ± 2.9; range 1.0-10.0). Based on the QUICK-DASH score, all patients showed no difficulties in daily life. The extent of avulsion did not influence the outcome. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the minimally invasive treatment of a bony mallet finger should be offered to every patient, because it is safe, fast, and reliable. Thus, we propose to perform extension-block pinning independently of the articular area.

Boutonniere Versus Pseudoboutonniere Deformities: Pathoanatomy, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Finger injuries involving the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint are common, particularly among athletes. Injury severity is often underappreciated at initial presentation and may be dismissed broadly as a "jammed finger" injury. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of certain injuries can have an important impact on the patient's chance of regaining full function. Central slip and PIP volar plate injuries are frequently encountered injuries that, if left untreated, can lead to the permanent loss of function of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Despite the differing mechanisms of these 2 pathologies, volar plate hyperextension injuries often present with a PIP joint flexion contracture and mild distal interphalangeal joint hyperextension deformity. This is similar to a boutonniere deformity seen after an injury to the central slip, and thus, has been referred to as a "pseudo-boutonnière" deformity. Distinguishing these 2 diagnoses is important, as treatment differs, and highlights the importance of thoroughly understanding the anatomy and relevant clinical applications when evaluating PIP joint injuries.

Acute Mallet Finger Injuries-A Review.

Acute disruptions of the terminal extensor tendon are common and can result in significant dysfunction if not recognized and treated appropriately. This article provides a topical review of the contemporary literature concerning acute mallet finger injuries. It also proposes a modification to the Doyle classification to make it more encompassing and less prone to interobserver error.

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3-Point Prefabricated Orthosis and Elastic Tape Versus Cast Immobilization for the Nonsurgical Management of Mallet Finger.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the outcomes of using a 3-point prefabricated orthosis with elastic tape versus cast immobilization for the management of nonsurgical mallet finger. METHODS: This study was conducted in a single center. Individuals with a mallet injury requiring nonsurgical management were randomized to 6 weeks of full-time immobilization with either a 3-point prefabricated orthosis and elastic tape or a cast for distal interphalangeal joint extension. Outcomes were assessed at 12 weeks after the initiation of full-time immobilization and 6 months after injury. RESULTS: A total of 70 individuals agreed to participate in the study between April 2017 and April 2021. No statistically or clinically significant differences were found between the groups regarding distal interphalangeal joint extension lag, distal interphalangeal joint flexion deficits, function according to the brief Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire, and pain on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The overall findings for both treatment groups included means of <15° of extensor lag and minimal pain (mean, <1.2 of 10) at the 6-month outcome assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a 3-point prefabricated orthosis with elastic tape and cast are both appropriate immobilization options for the management of nonsurgical mallet finger. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis of the Distal Interphalangeal Joint: A Follow-Up Study of 12 Years After Nonsurgical Treatment of Mallet Finger Fractures.

PURPOSE: In treatment of mallet finger fractures (MFFs), the aim is to minimize residual extension lag, reduce subluxation, and restore congruency of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint. Failure to do so may increase the risk of secondary osteoarthritis (OA). However, long-term follow-up studies focusing on OA of the DIP joint after an MFF are scarce. The purpose of this study was to assess OA, functional outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after an MFF. METHODS: A cohort study was performed with 52 patients who sustained an MFF at a mean of 12.1 years (range, 9.9-15.5 years) previously and who were treated nonsurgically. A healthy contralateral DIP joint was used as the control. Outcomes were radiographic OA, using the Kellgren and Lawrence and Osteoarthritis Research Society International classifications, range of motion, pinch strength, and PROMs (Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire, 12-item Short Form Health Survey). Radiographic OA was correlated with PROMs and functional outcomes. RESULTS: At follow-up, there was an increase in OA in 41% to 44% of the MFFs. Of all the MFFs, 23% to 25% showed a higher degree of OA than the healthy control DIP joint. Range of motion (mean difference ranging from -6° to -14°) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire score (median difference, -1.3) were decreased after MFFs but not to a clinically relevant extent. Radiographic OA was weakly to moderately correlated with functional outcomes and PROMs. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological OA after an MFF is similar to the natural degenerative process in the DIP joint and is accompanied by a decrease in range of motion of the DIP joint, which does not clinically affect PROMs. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The relative motion concept in acute and chronic boutonniere deformity: Invited commentary.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. INTRODUCTION: Boutonniere deformity (BD) is a troublesome injury occurring from rupture of tissue connecting the extrinsic to intrinsic tendon systems. This causes loss of interphalangeal joint balance, and immobilization often results in adherence and difficulty restoring balance. PURPOSES: Review of relative motion flexion (RMF) orthotic use for safe healing during functional activity in 23 patients, and explanation of the rationale. METHODS: Anatomic rationale and clinical experience is reviewed in 8 acute BD patients utilizing RMF orthoses for 6 weeks, and for chronic BD patients, 3 months after serial casting. RESULTS: All patients met the Strickland and Steichen criteria for "excellent" results following treatment, with an average of 35° increase in ROM. DISCUSSION: The anatomic rationale for relative motion recognizes that altering relative positioning between adjacent metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints produces a protective favorable impact on interphalangeal forces during hand function using 15°-20° greater MCP joint flexion. This provides dorsal and volar protective benefits because the extensor digitorum communis (EDC), a single-muscle-four-tendon system, attaches to the intrinsic lateral band (LB) tendons. With greater MCP flexion, dorsal EDC force is increased, pulling lateral bands medially, while on the volar surface the downward pull of the lumbrical on LB is relaxed due to origin from the flexor digitorum profundus tendon of the injured digit, also a single-muscle-four-tendon system. The RMF orthosis permits protected active motion during functional activity with acute BD. In patients with chronic BD and adequate passive extension, an RMF orthosis for 3 months also produced encouraging results. CONCLUSION: Management of acute BD with RMF orthoses provided earlier recovery of motion and hand function. Similar results occurred for chronic BD using serial casting for adequate extension followed by 3 months of RMF orthotic use and should be attempted prior to surgical intervention, with surgery remaining an alternative.

An in-depth look at zone III and IV anatomy of the finger extensor mechanism and some clinical implications for use of the relative motion flexion orthosis.

BACKGROUND: For hand therapists and hand surgeons acute and chronic injuries of the extensor mechanism (EM) in zones III-IV are challenging to treat with satisfying results. INTRODUCTION: Early active motion combined with relative motion flexion (RMF) orthoses to manage EM zone III injuries and boutonnière deformity has renewed interest in the complex anatomy and biomechanics of the EM. PURPOSE: To provide an in-depth discussion of EM zones III-IV anatomy with emphasis on inter-tendinous structures, often omitted in simplified, model-wise illustrations which focus mostly on the tendinous structures. METHOD: In collaboration the authors combined on the one hand extensive clinical experience and knowledge of the EM literature and on the other hand decades of anatomical, biomechanical and kinesiology research of the EM with special interest for the spiral fibers, through gross anatomy and microdissection anatomy laboratory work, MRI and ultrasonography studies. RESULTS: The inter-tendinous tissues (i.e., spiral fibers) in zone III are of imminent importance for proper functioning of the EM and to prevent boutonnière deformity to develop after EM surgery or injury. DISCUSSION: Inter-tendinous links between the tendinous structures of the EM are necessary for balanced finger motion. The spiral fibers are described in more detail because of their role in controlling volar migration of the conjoined lateral bands and because their disruption makes development of boutonnière deformity more likely. Understanding the anatomy and biomechanics of the EM may assist in progress toward 'proof of concept' for use of RMF orthoses and controlled early active motion after EM injury or surgery. CONCLUSION: Hand surgery and hand therapy practice interventions, including use of RMF orthoses for management of non-surgical and surgical EM injuries may benefit from an in-depth look at the EM zone III and IV anatomy and biomechanics.

Central Slip Reconstruction With a Distally Based Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Slip: A Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: The ideal method of central slip reconstruction is difficult to determine due to the multitude of techniques, nonstandardized outcome reporting, and small patient series in the literature. Although most boutonniere deformities may be treated with nonsurgical measures, chronic, subacute, or open injuries may require operative intervention. To aid surgeons in the choice of the ideal central slip reconstruction method, this biomechanical study compared the 3 most common methods performed at our institution: direct repair, lateral band centralization, and distally-based flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) slip repair. METHODS: A boutonniere deformity was induced in 35 fresh-frozen cadaver digits. The central slip was repaired in 9 digits using a primary suture repair, in 9 digits using a lateral band centralization technique, and in 9 digits using a distally-based FDS slip reconstruction. A control group without injury was tested in 8 digits. Following repair or reconstruction, each digit was tested for load to failure, strain, and stiffness at the repair. RESULTS: The average load to failure after central slip reconstruction was significantly greater for a distally based FDS slip method at 82.1 ± 14.6 N (95% CI, 62.2-101.9 N) than all other repair types. Although the FDS slip reconstruction was not as strong as the intact state (82.1 N vs 156.2 N, respectively), it was 2.6 times stronger than the lateral band centralization (82.1 N vs 31.6 N, respectively) and 3 times stronger than a primary repair (82.1 N vs 27.6 N, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of the central slip using a distally-based FDS slip provided the greatest biomechanical strength compared with the direct repair or lateral band centralization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of a distally based reconstruction using FDS may allow for safer early motion.

Clarification of Extensor Tenotomy for Finger Deformities.

This article clarifies the terminology and different applications of proximal Fowler extensor tenotomy and distal Dolphin extensor tenotomy. Although Fowler is a popular eponym for all finger extensor tenotomies, proximal Fowler tenotomy is specifically indicated for swan neck deformities, whereas distal Dolphin tenotomy is indicated for boutonniere deformities. For swan neck deformities with a distal interphalangeal joint extensor lag of greater than 40°, central slip tenotomy can be combined with terminal tendon imbrication or reinsertion. More distal Dolphin tenotomy of the lateral conjoined bands is complemented by centralization of the lateral bands or central slip reconstruction to correct hyperflexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint. The pertinent anatomic structures, mechanisms of release, and biomechanical principles have been demonstrated using intraoperative and animated videos of the surgical techniques.

Y-Shaped Tendon Graft-A Technique in the Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Chronic Boutonniere Deformity.

PURPOSE: Current reconstruction strategies for chronic posttraumatic boutonniere deformities have variable outcomes and are prone to complications. This study aimed to describe the clinical outcomes of a Y-shaped tendon graft technique. METHODS: In this retrospective case study, we reviewed the files of 18 patients treated with the Y-shaped tendon graft between January 2010 and January 2017. The technique involves release of the central slip, lateral bands, and transverse retinacular ligaments at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, total excision of scar tissue in the central slip and at the insertion site, and construction of 3 1.5-mm unicortical holes at the base of the middle phalanx, through which a Y-shaped graft of the palmaris longus is inserted to reconstruct the central slip and stabilize the lateral bands in a dorsal position. Clinical evaluations included measuring the active range of motion in the PIP joint and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, grip strength, Souter score, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 36.1 years, and 12 of the 18 patients were men. The average follow-up period was 23 months (range, 13-38 months). The preoperative PIP joint extension deficit was 48.0° ± 5.0° compared with 10.9° ± 9.3° after surgery. The preoperative DIP joint active flexion was 34.4° ± 8.0° compared with 71.4° ± 8.6° after surgery The outcomes based on the Souter score were 11 excellent, 5 good, and 2 poor. The QuickDASH score was 17.7 ± 6.4 before surgery and 11.2 ± 7.2 after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The Y-shaped tendon graft can be a useful procedure for the correction of chronic boutonniere deformity; in our patient series, this provided good or excellent results in 16 of 18 patients. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Spiral Oblique Retinacular Ligament Procedure Using Flexor Digitorum Profundus Hemi-Tendon Transfer: Anatomical Basis and Clinical Application.

PURPOSE: The spiral oblique retinacular ligament (SORL) procedure acts as a dynamic tenodesis to restore distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) extension and restrain proximal interphalangeal hyperextension. Despite the ingenious technique based on the oblique retinacular ligament anatomy, obtaining strong internal fixation remains an issue during the SORL procedure. We present a modified technique using the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) hemi-tendon transfer. METHODS: We dissected 5 fresh cadaveric specimens to evaluate morphometric parameters of the SORL procedure using the hemi-FDP. The volar groove of the FDP tendon was identified in zone I of the flexor sheath and the tendon was divided into radial and ulnar bundles. The selected hemi-tendon was divided at the proximal edge of the A1 pulley and a SORL procedure was performed through a transosseous tunnel in the distal phalanx. This technique was used in 3 patients with swan neck deformity. RESULTS: The optimal distance between the DIP joint and the anterior drill hole of the transosseous tunnel was 7.6 mm (range, 6.8-8.5 mm). The relative loss of length of the tendon owing to the SORL path was 25.8 mm (range, 19.6-29.9 mm). In the clinical cases, the procedure improved DIP joint extension lag and prevented proximal interphalangeal joint hyperextension. Preserving one-half of the FDP allowed complete flexion of the DIP joint. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure is technically feasible. Its main advantages are that a distal suture is not required and that the substantial length of the tendon allows sturdy proximal internal fixation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Distal Radius Physeal Bar and Ulnar Overgrowth: Indications for Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius physeal bar with associated growth arrest can occur because of fractures, ischemia, infection, radiation, tumor, blood dyscrasias, and repetitive stress injuries. The age of the patient as well as the size, shape, and location of the bony bridge determines the deformity and associated pathology that will develop. METHODS: A search of the English literature was performed using PubMed and multiple search terms to identify manuscripts dealing with the evaluation and treatment of distal radius physeal bars and ulnar overgrowth. Single case reports and level V studies were excluded. RESULTS: Manuscripts evaluating distal radial physeal bars and their management were identified. A growth discrepancy between the radius and ulna can lead to distal radioulnar joint instability, ulnar impaction, and degenerative changes in the carpus and triangular fibrocartilage complex. Advanced imaging aids in the evaluation and mapping of a physeal bar. Treatment options for distal radius physeal bars include observation, bar resection±interposition, epiphysiodeses of the ulna±completion epiphysiodesis of the radius, ulnar shortening osteotomy±diagnostic arthroscopy to manage associated triangular fibrocartilage complex pathology, radius osteotomy, and distraction osteogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Decision-making when presented with a distal radius physeal bar is multifactorial and should incorporate the age and remaining growth potential of the patient, the size and location of the bar, and patient and family expectations.

Proximal Humerus Fractures: What Alignment is Acceptable in Children 10 and Up?

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the proximal humerus in skeletally immature patients are rare, and even rarer still in individuals approaching skeletal maturity. Concepts regarding remodeling potential, amount of deformity and functional demands can guide our treatment decision making, but criteria are poorly defined. The purpose of this manuscript is to discuss the issues and the best available evidence. METHODS: A search of the English literature was carried out using PubMed to identify papers on the topic of proximal humerus fractures in skeletally immature individuals. RESULTS: The literature available on the topic of pediatric proximal humerus fractures is limited, especially regarding fractures in patients approaching skeletal maturity. Certainly, as the remodeling potential decreases and the amount of deformity and functional demand increase, the need for operative treatment increases. The exact tolerances and criteria have not been established. A variety of surgical techniques exist, and have been shown to be helpful. CONCLUSIONS: Operative treatment may be necessary in individuals approaching skeletal maturity. Concepts discussed in this paper regarding remodeling, amount of deformity and functional demand may help the surgeon to make appropriate treatment decisions. Future prospective comparative studies which are pending will hopefully shed further light on this matter.

A single K-wire to prevent poor outcomes in closed soft-tissue mallet finger management due to patient non-compliance.

INTRODUCTION: Soft-tissue mallet finger occurs due to loss of terminal extensor tendon secondary to rupture of distal phalanx. Although using noninvasive splints for 6-8 weeks is the gold standard for conservative treatment of closed soft-tissue mallet injuries, patient compliance is an important factor impacting on patient outcomes. In this study, we used a single Kirschner Wire (K-W) to fix the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint in extension in those patients failed to comply with routine splinting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 190 patients with Doyle type 1 closed soft-tissue mallet finger deformity were included in four groups between 2011 and 2015. These groups were determined according to treatment modalities. Patients in the first group were treated with a finger splint (n = 109). Patients in the second group first received a finger splint and then K-W was applied due to lack of adequate compliance (n = 23). Patients in the third group were treated with K-W only (n = 47), and the fourth group did not accept surgical treatment nor conservative treatment (n = 11). After 20 weeks of follow up, we evaluated the results with functional measurements according to Crawford criteria and patient satisfaction. Additionally, the mid-term outcome was assessed with a follow-up at 2 years. RESULTS: At 20th week postoperatively, average DIP extension lag was 6 degrees (0-30) for the first group, 6.1 degrees (0-30) for the second group, 3.8 degrees (0-25) for the third group, and 17.3 degrees (7-30) for the fourth group. Total patient satisfaction was 85%, which was considered excellent or good. Swan neck deformity was observed in 11% of patients. Osteomyelitis and KW related complications were not observed. There were no statistically significant differences between short-term and mid-term results. CONCLUSION: Internal fixation via K-W may be a suitable treatment option compared to splint therapy for management of closed soft-tissue mallet finger in noncompliant patients. Using this treatment approach, the success rate for patients could satisfactorily be improved.

[Extensor tendon injuries at the level of the proximal interphalangeal joint]. / Strecksehnenverletzungen in Höhe des Mittelgelenks.

Closed and open injuries of the extensor mechanism at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint can involve the central slip, the lateral slips or both. They are classified as zone III injuries. All open injuries on the dorsal side of the PIP joint should raise suspicion of an extensor tendon injury that is frequently overlooked. The operative strategy consists of wound revision with extensor tendon suture or refixation of the central slip. Acute closed central slip injuries are clinically diagnosed (Elson test) after ruling out bony injuries to the joint. Nondisplaced avulsions of the central slip insertion or lacerations can be treated nonoperatively by splinting. For displaced avulsions and complex injuries the treatment is surgical. In overlooked injuries a typical deformity (buttonhole/Boutonnière deformity) develops within 1-2 weeks that is characterized by an extension lag of the PIP joint and hyperextension at the distal interphalangeal joint. In early cases, when passive extension is still complete (mobile buttonhole deformity) the central slip can be immediately reconstructed. In fixed deformities complete passive extension of the PIP joint has to be restored before surgery by hand therapeutic measures or PIP joint release. Depending on the pattern of the injury and the resulting defects, a number of reconstructive techniques have been established that are summarized in this article. The functional results can be limited by tendon adhesions, imbalance within the reconstructed extensor apparatus and stiff joints that can all restrict the range of motion. Therefore, active rehabilitation protocols are mandatory for optimal results.

Patient characteristics affecting knowledge of the possibility of surgical reconstruction for rheumatoid hand and wrist deformities.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate patient characteristics affecting their knowledge of surgical reconstruction for rheumatoid hand and wrist deformities, and to investigate such characteristics affecting their hope of receiving hand surgery if patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) knew surgical reconstruction options. METHODS: We carried out a questionnaire survey for all patients with RA who came to our outpatient department of rheumatology. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine significant characteristics associated with the knowledge of surgical reconstruction and patients' hope of receiving hand surgery. RESULTS: In total, 687 patients were evaluated in this study and 337 (49%) reported knowledge about surgical reconstruction. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with good control of disease activity and with long-lasting hand and wrist deformities were significantly associated with having knowledge of surgical reconstruction. Among the 337 patients with knowledge, only 122 (36%) expressed a hope of receiving hand surgery. The statistical analysis showed that younger age and surgical history were significantly associated with the hope of receiving surgery. CONCLUSION: Surgeons and rheumatologists should enlighten patients about the importance of hand surgery to achieve functional remission in this new era of treatment for patients with RA.

Outcomes of conservative treatment for bony mallet fingers.

BACKGROUND: The treatment strategy for bony mallet fingers remains controversial. The outcomes of conservative treatment were investigated in this study. In addition, the time to bone union, and gap between the bone fragment and distal phalanx are discussed. METHODS: The subjects were 26 patients (27 fingers) with bony mallet fingers (20 males and 6 females, mean age: 46.0 years old, the mean limitation of extension of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint: - 20.2°). In conservative treatment, splinting was applied for 6 weeks, followed by 2-week taping. The time to bone union, range of motion of the DIP joint, and the Crawford classification on the final follow-up were investigated. In addition, the bone fragment occupation rate was evaluated on plain radiography on the first examination. Furthermore, the gap on the first examination and after splinting. The relationship between the gap and bone union period was also investigated. RESULTS: The mean time from injury to bone union was 170.2 days, the mean range of motion of the DIP joint was - 8.5° in extension and 60.9° in flexion, and the Crawford classification was Excellent for 22 fingers, Good for 2, Fair for 2, and Poor for 1. On the first examination, the mean bone fragment occupation rate was 44.0%. The mean gap on the first examination was 1.1 mm and this was significantly narrowed to 0.8 mm after splinting (p < 0.01). No significant correlation was noted between the time to bone union and gap on the first examination (p = 0.16), however, a significant positive correlation was noted between them after splinting (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that a favorable clinical outcome can be achieved by conservative treatment. Moreover, the bone union period decreased as the gap after splinting decreased, being significantly correlated.

A Paradigm Shift in Managing Acute and Chronic Boutonniere Deformity: Anatomic Rationale and Early Clinical Results for the Relative Motion Concept Permitting Immediate Active Motion and Hand Use.

BACKGROUND: We have utilized relative motion splinting for early motion following acute repair of boutonniere injuries, and we have developed nonoperative orthosis-based therapy for the treatment of chronic injuries. We offer our early clinical experience using relative motion flexion splinting for boutonniere deformities and explain the anatomic rationale that permits immediate active motion and hand use following acute injury or repair. For chronic boutonniere deformity, we offer a nonsurgical management method with low morbidity as a safe alternative to surgery. METHODS: Our understanding of the extrinsic-intrinsic anatomic interrelationship in boutonniere deformity offers rationale for relative motion flexion splinting, which is confirmed by cadaver study. Our early clinical results in 5 closed and 3 open acute and 15 chronic cases have encouraged recommending this management technique. For repaired open and closed acutely injured digits, we utilize relative motion flexion orthoses that place the injured digits in 15° to 20° greater metacarpophalangeal flexion than its neighboring digits and otherwise permit full active range of motion and functional hand use maintaining the 15° to 20° greater metacarpophalangeal flexion for 6 weeks. In fixed chronic boutonniere cases, serial casting is utilized to obtain as much proximal interphalangeal extension as possible (at least -20°), and then relative motion flexion splinting and hand use is instituted for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Our acute cases obtained as good as, or better range of motion than, conventional management techniques, with early full flexion and maintenance of extension without any recurrences. The most significant difference is morbidity, with ability to preserve hand function during healing and the absence of further therapy after 6 weeks of splinting. Patients with chronic boutonniere deformity presented from 8 weeks to 3 years following injury (averaging 31 weeks) and were 15 to 99 years of age (averaging 42 years). All were serially casted to less than -20° (averaging -4°) and maintained that level of extension after 3 months of relative motion flexion splinting. All achieved flexion to their palm, and all met the Steichen-Strickland chronic boutonniere classification of "excellent." There were no recurrent progressive boutonniere deformities in either acute or chronic cases and no instances of reflex sympathetic dystrophy/chronic regional pain syndrome (RSD/CRPS). CONCLUSIONS: Relative motion flexion splinting affords early active motion and hand use with excellent range of motion achieved following acute open boutonniere repair or closed boutonniere rupture with less morbidity than conventional management. Chronic boutonniere deformity will respond to relative motion flexion splinting if serial casting can place the proximal interphalangeal joint in less than -20° extension, and the patient actively uses the hand in a relative motion flexion orthosis for 3 months, recovering flexion. No further therapy was needed in our cases. We believe this management technique should be attempted for chronic boutonniere deformity as a preferable alternative to surgery, which remains an option if needed.

Effect of Distal Ulna Osteochondroma Excision and Distal Ulnar Tether Release on Forearm Deformity in Preadolescent Patients With Multiple Hereditary Exostosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple hereditary exostosis is a benign condition that can lead to significant forearm deformity secondary to physeal disturbances. As the child grows, the deformity can worsen as relative shortening of the ulna causes tethering, which may lead to increased radial articular angle, carpal slippage, and radial bowing, over time this tethering can also result in radial head subluxation or frank dislocation. Worsening of forearm deformities often require corrective reconstructive osteotomies to improve anatomic alignment and function. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of osteochondroma excision and distal ulnar tether release on clinical function, radiographic anatomic forearm alignment, and need for future corrective osteotomies. METHODS: The authors reviewed a retrospective cohort of preadolescent patients who underwent distal ulna osteochondroma resection and ulnar tethering release (triangular fibrocartilage complex). Patients were invited back and prospectively evaluated for postoperative range of motion, pain scores, self-reported and parent-reported Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) scores. In addition, preoperative and final postsurgical follow-up forearm x-rays were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 6 patients and 7 forearms were included in our study with an average age of 7.9 years at time of surgery. The average final follow-up was 7.4 years. With respect to range of motion, only passive radial deviation demonstrated improvement -20 to 14 degrees (P=0.01). Although there was not statistically significant change in radial articular angle, this study did find an improvement in carpal slip 75.7% to 53.8% (P=0.03). At final follow-up DASH score was 5.71 (σ=5.35), PODCI Global Function score was 95.2 (σ=5.81), and PODCI-Happiness score 98 (σ=2.74). Visual analogue scale appearance and visual analogue scale pain assessment were 1.67 (σ=1.21) and 1.00 (σ=1.26), respectively, at final follow-up. No patient in the cohort developed a radial head dislocation. Only one of 7 forearms required a corrective osteotomy within the study's follow-up time period. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical excision of forearm osteochondromas with ulnar tether release in the preadolescent patients improves carpal slip, may help to prevent subsequent surgical reconstruction and provides satisfactory clinical results at an average 7-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic study.