Multivariate Analysis and Prediction Model Construction for Dermatoscope Use by Chinese Dermatologists via an Online Survey.

BACKGROUND: The use of dermatoscopes is constantly increasing globally, but to date, there are no studies on the use of dermatoscopes by Chinese dermatologists. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors influencing the use of dermatoscopes in China. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was designed by the Department of Dermatology at Huashan Hospital affiliated with Fudan University and was published online via the Shanghai Wheat Color Intelligent Technology Company, China. In 2019 and 2022, 1581 and 1507 dermatologists, respectively, were recruited and completed the questionnaire online. RESULTS: In China, the application rate of dermatoscopy is higher in eastern provinces than in western and remote areas. The proportion of doctors from public tertiary hospitals is the highest, with females being the majority. The age range of 30-40 years has the highest proportion, the proportion of doctors with professional titles of attending physician or above is the highest, and the proportion of doctors with a bachelor's degree or above is the highest. CONCLUSIONS: By improving the education and professional standards of doctors, providing more training opportunities, simplifying access, and promoting dermatoscopy in grassroots hospitals, we can increase the confidence of dermatologists in the use of dermatoscopy.

Dark pigmented lesions: Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy in a tertiary referral center for skin cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: There is lack of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) for dark pigmented lesions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy plus confocal microscopy for melanoma diagnosis of dark pigmented lesions in real life. METHODS: Prospective analysis of difficult dark lesions with clinical/dermoscopic suspicion of melanoma referred for RCM for further analysis. The outcome could be excision or dermoscopic digital follow-up. RESULTS: We included 370 clinically dark lesions from 350 patients (median age, 45 y). Because of the clinical/dermoscopic/RCM approach, we saved 129 of 213 unnecessary biopsies (specificity of 60.6%), with a sensitivity of 98.1% (154/157). The number needed to excise with the addition of RCM was 1.5 for melanoma diagnosis. LIMITATIONS: Single institution based; Italian population only. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that RCM coupled with dermoscopy increases the specificity for diagnosing melanoma, and it helps correctly identify benign lesions. Our findings provide the basis for subsequent prospective studies on melanocytic neoplasms belonging to patients in different countries.

In vivo imaging characterization of basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous response to high-dose ionizing radiation therapy: A prospective study of reflectance confocal microscopy, dermoscopy, and ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) is a treatment option for select skin cancers. The histologic effects of RT on normal skin or skin cancers are not well characterized. Dermoscopy, high-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS), and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) are noninvasive imaging modalities that may help characterize RT response. OBJECTIVES: To describe changes in the tumor and surrounding skin of patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) treated with RT. METHODS: The study was conducted between 2014 and 2018. Patients with biopsy-proven BCCs were treated with 42 Gy in 6 fractions using a commercially available brachytherapy device. Dermoscopy, HFUS, and RCM were performed before treatment and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after RT. RESULTS: A total of 137 imaging assessments (RCM + dermoscopy + HFUS) were performed in 12 patients. BCC-specific features were present in 81.8%, 91%, and 17% of patients imaged with dermoscopy, RCM, and HFUS at baseline, respectively, before treatment. After treatment, the resolution of these features was noted in 33.4%, 91.7%, and 100% of patients imaged with the respective modalities. No recurrences were seen after a mean of 31.7 months of follow-up. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and no histopathologic correlation. CONCLUSION: Dermoscopy and HFUS were not as reliable as RCM at characterizing BCC RT response.

Dermoscopic Findings in the Presurgical Evaluation of Basal Cell Carcinoma. A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the best treatment for basal cell carcinoma (BCC); however, incomplete excisions are possible. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the accurateness of dermoscopy and clinical evaluation in the detection of borders of BCC and description of dermoscopic findings in clinically healthy tissue surrounding BCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight lesions with clinical dermoscopic diagnosis of BCC were examined clinically and dermoscopically, to delineate the correct site of surgical incision, demarcating the respective margins with colred dermographic pencils. Specific dermoscopic features were searched in the skin adjacent to the demarcated clinical margin. RESULTS: In 29 of 88 lesions, clinical and dermoscopic margins of the tumor coincided. In the remaining 59 (67%), 10 (16.9%) presented, in the lesion area identified under dermoscopy, classical criteria for BCC and 57 (96.6%) nonclassical criteria. Differences between clinical and dermoscopic margins were significantly more frequent in superficial BCCs (p = .006). The frequency was not significantly different (p = .85) in relation to body sites. CONCLUSION: Dermoscopy improves the identification of margins for surgical excision in BCC. The observation of nontraditional dermoscopic criteria of BCC, mainly pink-white areas and short telangiectasias in the area between clinically and dermoscopically detected margins, helps to define the actual tumoral margins and to achieve a really radical excision.

Diagnostic tools used for melanoma: A survey of Australian general practitioners and dermatologists.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic tools such as dermoscopy, sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI), total body photography (TBP) and automated diagnostic tools are available to assist in early melanoma diagnosis. The use, accessibility and barriers of dermoscopy have been well studied; however, there are few similar studies regarding SDDI, TBP and automated diagnostic tools. We aim to understand the use of these diagnostic aids amongst Australian general practitioners (GPs) and dermatologists. METHODS: Between June 2019 and January 2020, GPs and dermatologists across Australia were invited to participate in an online survey. Surveys were distributed through GP and dermatology organisations. RESULTS: A total of 227 survey responses were received, 175 from GPs and 52 from dermatologists. Amongst GPs, 44.6% worked in a skin cancer clinic. Dermoscopy was used at least occasionally by 98.9% of all GPs. SDDI was used by 93.6% of skin cancer GPs, 80.8% of dermatologists and 45.3% of generalist GPs. TBP was used or recommended by 77.1% of generalist GPs, 82.3% of skin cancer GPs and 86.5% of dermatologists. The most common barriers to the use of TBP were cost, limited accessibility, poor patient compliance, and time required for both patients and doctors. Very few clinicians reported using automated diagnostic tools. There was an interest in future diagnostic aids for melanoma in 88% of GPs and dermatologists. CONCLUSION: Dermoscopy, SDDI and TBP were commonly used by responding Australian skin cancer GPs and dermatologists in this survey. Automated diagnostic tools were not reported to be used routinely. Several barriers were identified for use of TBP.

Number needed to biopsy ratio and diagnostic accuracy for melanoma detection.

BACKGROUND: The number needed to biopsy (NNB) ratio for melanoma diagnosis is calculated by dividing the total number of biopsies by the number of biopsied melanomas. It is the inverse of positive predictive value (PPV), which is calculated by dividing the number of biopsied melanomas by the total number of biopsies. NNB is increasingly used as a metric to compare the diagnostic accuracy of health care practitioners. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of NNB with the standard statistical measures of sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: We extracted published diagnostic accuracy data from 5 cross-sectional skin cancer reader studies (median [min-max] readers/study was 29 [8-511]). Because NNB is a ratio, we converted it to PPV. RESULTS: Four studies showed no association and 1 showed a negative association between PPV and sensitivity. All 5 studies showed a positive association between PPV and specificity. LIMITATIONS: Reader study data. CONCLUSIONS: An individual health care practitioner with a lower NNB is likely to have a higher specificity than one with a higher NNB, assuming they practice under similar conditions; no conclusions can be made about their relative sensitivities. We advocate for additional research to define quality metrics for melanoma detection and caution when interpreting NNB.

Computer algorithms show potential for improving dermatologists' accuracy to diagnose cutaneous melanoma: Results of the International Skin Imaging Collaboration 2017.

BACKGROUND: Computer vision has promise in image-based cutaneous melanoma diagnosis but clinical utility is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine if computer algorithms from an international melanoma detection challenge can improve dermatologists' accuracy in diagnosing melanoma. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we used 150 dermoscopy images (50 melanomas, 50 nevi, 50 seborrheic keratoses) from the test dataset of a melanoma detection challenge, along with algorithm results from 23 teams. Eight dermatologists and 9 dermatology residents classified dermoscopic lesion images in an online reader study and provided their confidence level. RESULTS: The top-ranked computer algorithm had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, which was higher than that of the dermatologists (0.74) and residents (0.66) (P < .001 for all comparisons). At the dermatologists' overall sensitivity in classification of 76.0%, the algorithm had a superior specificity (85.0% vs. 72.6%, P = .001). Imputation of computer algorithm classifications into dermatologist evaluations with low confidence ratings (26.6% of evaluations) increased dermatologist sensitivity from 76.0% to 80.8% and specificity from 72.6% to 72.8%. LIMITATIONS: Artificial study setting lacking the full spectrum of skin lesions as well as clinical metadata. CONCLUSION: Accumulating evidence suggests that deep neural networks can classify skin images of melanoma and its benign mimickers with high accuracy and potentially improve human performance.

Vulval hidradenoma papilliferum: a clinical and dermoscopic study.

Hidradenoma papilliferum (HP) is a rare, slow-growing, benign adnexal tumour with apocrine differentiation. It usually affects the anogenital region in adult women and is clinically polymorphous, mimicking other benign or malignant neoformations. The dermoscopic features of vulval HP have not been reported yet. We report the clinical and dermoscopic features in a case series of histopathologically proven vulval HPs. Dermoscopy may be a useful tool for the diagnosis of vulval HP. To our knowledge, our paper represents the first report of dermoscopic findings in a series of vulval HPs in a multiracial population.

Current approach of skin lesions suspected of malignancy in general practice in the Netherlands: a quantitative overview.

BACKGROUND: The role of general practitioners (GPs) in skin cancer care is increasing. Previous, hospital-based studies suggest that GPs might not have the capabilities to gain responsibility concerning skin cancer care. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the current approach of GPs towards skin lesions suspected of malignancy in the Netherlands. METHODS: In three general practices, all consultations in 2015 concerning skin lesions suspected of malignancy were identified and reviewed. Patients demographics, circumstances of consultation, evaluation of skin lesion(s), presumed diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy and policy were evaluated. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty consultations were identified. Patient took initiative for encounter in 90%. Case-finding occurred in 2%. Diagnostic tools were used in 22%; dermoscopy was used in 8% and a diagnostic excision in 10%. The GP diagnosed a benign lesion in 69%. Therapeutic interventions were applied in 31% and a wait-and-see policy in 40%. The diagnosis after referral was a benign tumour in 39% of the cases, a malignancy in 29% and a premalignant lesion in 17%. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the presumed benign, malignant and premalignant diagnoses was 86%, 54% and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most lesions that are presented to the GP with a suspicion of a malignancy appear to be benign lesions. In the examined practices, the diagnosis of the GP is mainly based on clinical examination and little use is made of available diagnostic tools. The use of a diagnostic tool like a biopsy might prevent unnecessary referrals.

The impact of dermoscopy on melanoma detection in the practice of dermatologists in Europe: results of a pan-European survey.

BACKGROUND: Dermoscopy is a widely used technique that can increase the sensitivity and specificity of melanoma detection. Information is lacking on the impact of dermoscopy use on the detection of melanoma in the real-life practice of European dermatologists. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that influence the benefit of using dermoscopy for increasing melanoma detection and lowering the number of unnecessary biopsies in the practice of European dermatologists. METHODS: We conducted a survey of dermatologists registered in 32 European countries regarding the following: the demographic and practice characteristics, dermoscopy training and use, opinions on dermoscopy and the self-estimated impact of dermoscopy use on the number of melanomas detected and the number of unnecessary biopsies performed in practice. RESULTS: Valid answers were collected for 7480 respondents, of which 6602 reported using dermoscopy. Eighty-six per cent of dermoscopy users reported that dermoscopy increased the numbers of melanomas they detected, and 70% reported that dermoscopy decreased the number of unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions they performed. The dermatologists reporting these benefits were more likely to have received dermoscopy training during residency, to use dermoscopy frequently and intensively, and to use digital dermoscopy systems and pattern analysis compared to dermatologists who did not perceive any benefit of dermoscopy for the melanoma recognition in their practice. CONCLUSIONS: Improving dermoscopy training, especially during residency and increasing access to digital dermoscopy equipment are important paths to enhance the benefit of dermoscopy for melanoma detection in the practice of European dermatologists.

Both short-term and long-term dermoscopy monitoring is useful in detecting melanoma in patients with multiple atypical nevi.

BACKGROUND: Digital dermoscopy monitoring (DDM) is an effective strategy for melanoma detection. Two methods are currently employed. Short-term follow-up (STFU) for the evaluation of single, atypical lesions to detect subtle changes over a short period of time (3-6 months). Long-term follow-up (LTFU) is recommended for patients with multiple nevi. Although a study demonstrated that STFU improves the patients' compliance for DDM, little remains known about the impact and reliability of STFU in this setting. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to evaluate the impact and reliability of a schedule combining STFU and LTFU in patients with multiple atypical nevi. METHODS: We searched our database for all cases of patients with multiple atypical nevi occurring between 2006 and 2014. RESULTS: A total of 3823 lesions in 541 patients were dermoscopically monitored (mean number = 7 lesions per patient; median = 6 lesions; range, 2-51). In all, 264 (6.9%) lesions in 184 (34.4%) patients were excised (mean of 0.5 lesions per patient). In total, 197 (74.6%) lesions were excised at follow-up, with melanomas representing 30.5% of lesions excised after follow-up. A total of 30 (33.3%) melanomas were excised at baseline, 23 (25.6%) after STFU and 37 (41.1%) after LTFU. There was no difference in the number of in situ melanomas detected at baseline with those detected after follow-up. The mean Breslow thickness of melanomas detected at baseline was higher than those detected after STFU (P = 0.038) and LTFU (P = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirm that digital dermoscopy follow-up is a valid management strategy for patients with multiple atypical nevi, with short-term monitoring playing an effective role also in this setting of patients.

Long-term evaluation of the efficacy of digital dermatoscopy monitoring at a tertiary referral center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We examined the value of monitoring patients with multiple nevi using sequential digital dermatoscopy imaging at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including 2,824 patients and 23,241 monitored lesions. We calculated trends in key parameters such as the number of melanomas and nevi monitored and excised. RESULTS: During follow-up, we excised 1,266 lesions in 709 patients, including 146 (11.5 %) melanomas. The percentage of in situ melanomas detected at follow-up was significantly higher than at baseline (46.6 % versus 23.4 %, p ≤ 0.001). The risk of detecting a melanoma during follow-up was higher for patients with a melanoma at baseline, compared to those without (relative risk: 3.59, 95 % CI: 2.15 to 6.00). The number of documented lesions showed a positive correlation with the benign/malignant ratio, and excisions at baseline decreased significantly over the course of the study period. CONCLUSION: Digital dermatoscopy monitoring improves the detection of thin melanomas in patients with multiple nevi. Patients with a melanoma at baseline are at an increased risk of developing a melanoma during follow-up and should therefore be a target group for sequential dermatoscopy imaging.

Factors driving the use of dermoscopy in Europe: a pan-European survey.

BACKGROUND: When used correctly, dermoscopy is an essential tool for helping clinicians in the diagnosis of skin diseases and the early detection of skin cancers. Despite its proven benefits, there is a lack of data about how European dermatologists use dermoscopy in everyday practice. OBJECTIVES: To identify the motivations, obstacles and modifiable factors influencing the use of dermoscopy in daily dermatology practice across Europe. METHODS: All registered dermatologists in 32 European countries were invited to complete an online survey of 20 questions regarding demographic and practice characteristics, dermoscopy training and self-confidence in dermoscopic skills, patterns of dermoscopy use, reasons for not using dermoscopy and attitudes relating to dermoscopy utility. RESULTS: We collected 7480 valid answers, of which 89% reported use of dermoscopy. The main reasons for not using dermoscopy were lack of equipment (58% of nonusers) and lack of training (42%). Dermoscopy training during residency was reported by 41% of dermoscopy users and by 12% of nonusers (P < 0·001). Dermatologists working in public hospitals were the least likely to use dermoscopy. High use of dermoscopy across the spectrum of skin diseases was reported by 62% of dermoscopy users and was associated with dermoscopy training during residency, the use of polarized light and digital dermoscopy devices, longer dermoscopy practice, younger age and female gender. CONCLUSIONS: Expanding access to dermoscopy equipment, especially in public healthcare facilities and establishing dermoscopy training during dermatology residency would further enhance the substantially high dermoscopy use across European countries.

Dermoscopy, a useful tool for general practitioners in melanoma screening: a nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: Dermoscopy improves diagnostic accuracy in melanoma, as shown by several meta-analyses. Although it is used by general practitioners (GPs) in Australia, Canada and Italy, no published data on this topic are available in France. OBJECTIVES: To review the opinions and use of dermoscopy by GPs in France and to understand their practice of skin examination. METHODS: We designed a descriptive and cross-sectional survey and conducted it between 26 November and 26 December 2014. An anonymous, multiple-choice questionnaire about the demographic characteristics, skin examination modalities and use and training in dermoscopy was sent to 4057 GPs in four large regions of France. Pearson, χ(2) , Student, Welch and Fisher tests were used for cross-tabulation statistical analysis. RESULTS: Only 8% of respondents had access to a dermoscope; most were male practitioners and aged > 50 years. Dermoscopy increased self-confidence in analysing pigmented lesions (P = 0·004), and dermoscopy users referred fewer patients to dermatologists. The number of biopsies was reduced in the dermoscopy users group (P = 0·004). In total, 425 questionnaires were returned and analysed. Dermoscopy users took more time to evaluate a single pigmented lesion (P = 0·015). Only 16·9% of physicians declared having received some training on dermoscopy, yet this number reached 47% for those owning a dermoscope. Their training was mostly short and recent. Overall 29·2% of the respondents said the main advantage was to reduce the number of referrals to the dermatologists (P = 0·004), while its main disadvantage was the necessity of training (54·6%). Our responders declared they could spend seven working days on a dermoscopy training course. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates positive opinions regarding dermoscopy, despite a minority of French GPs using this technique in the areas surveyed. The need for formal training appears to be the main limitation to wider use. Appropriate and specifically designed training programmes should be offered.

The utility of dermoscopy-guided histologic sectioning for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Dermoscopy allows for visualization of morphologic structures beyond the epidermis, including features that may indicate early malignant transformation. However, dermoscopic features are rarely considered during routine histologic sectioning, and areas of clinical concern may be missed during microscopic evaluation. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the diagnostic impact of a dermoscopy-guided micropunch score for the evaluation of melanocytic lesions. METHODS: In this case-control study, we evaluated 150 scored melanocytic lesions. Original tissue specimens were reprocessed to create a control group, in which a new score was introduced elsewhere in the lesion to guide an alternative plane of section. Slides were reviewed in a randomized, double-blinded manner to assess histologic features and render a diagnosis. Dermoscopy was also reviewed. RESULTS: The proportion of cases with a higher grade in the original, dermoscopy-guided section was statistically significant. Four invasive melanomas were exclusively identified using the scoring protocol. The presence of regression structures, negative pigment network, radial streaming or pseudopods, and irregular blotches were highly specific for a higher diagnostic grade. LIMITATIONS: This study is retrospective and reprocessing tissue does not perfectly mimic routine sectioning. CONCLUSION: Dermoscopy can identify important, histologically high-grade areas, and this information can be used to optimize the sectioning of melanocytic neoplasms.