Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among patients with combined dentition defect and non-functional impacted teeth toward tooth autotransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Tooth autotransplantation (TAT) is a surgical procedure involving the extraction of a tooth from one location and its subsequent transplantation into another alveolar socket within the same individual. This innovative treatment approach holds significant promise. Nonetheless, the potential recipients exhibit a limited level of awareness and understanding of this procedure. This study investigated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among patients with combined dentition defects and non-functional impacted teeth toward TAT. METHODS: This web-based cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2022 and February 2023 at one hospital. A self-designed questionnaire was developed to collect demographic information of the patients and assess their knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward TAT. RESULTS: A total of 533 valid questionnaires were collected. The mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 5.55 ± 2.38 (possible range: 0-10), 26.82 ± 2.46 (possible range, 8-40), and 27.45 ± 7.40 (possible range, 9-45), respectively. CONCLUSION: The participants had insufficient knowledge, negative attitudes, and passive practices toward TAT. Targeted interventions should be implemented to improve the understanding and practice of TAT among patients with dentition defects.

Dental autotransplantation: a viable solution for preserving oral health and function.

DESIGN: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on dental autotransplantation (DAT). AIM: To provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on prognostic factors, outcomes, and complications of DAT by synthesizing the evidence. METHODS: A comprehensive search of six databases was conducted for systematic reviews and meta-analyses published up to June 30, 2022. Two authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Raw data from primary studies were analyzed using a random effects meta-analysis, and meta-regression was performed to investigate the effect of open and closed apices on the outcomes. RESULTS: Ten systematic reviews, of which nine included meta-analyses, were examined. The overall success rate of the studies was 89.4%, and the survival rate was 96.1%. The main complications were ankylosis (4.6%) and root resorption (7.4%). The analysis showed that a closed apex increased the proportion of ankylosis, resorption, and reduced survival but had no effect on success. The quality of the systematic reviews included varied, with 20% scoring moderate, 60% scoring low, and 20% scoring critically low on the AMSTAR 2 scale. CONCLUSIONS: Dental implant therapy is a reliable solution for replacing lost or damaged teeth, with high success and survival rates. However, it is a procedure that requires precision and attention to detail, along with careful selection of suitable candidates, comprehensive planning, and consideration of factors that may impact outcomes. To improve results and reduce potential complications, it is essential to establish standard clinical guidelines and conduct further extensive research.

AUTOTRANSPLANTATION OF TEETH WITH OPEN APICES MAY RESULT IN HIGH SURVIVAL RATES BUT EVIDENCE IS LIMITED.

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Tooth autotransplantation: an umbrella review. Tan BL, Tong HJ, Narashimhan S, Banihani A, Nazzal H, Duggal MS. Dent Traumatol 2023;39(Suppl 1):2-29. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Open access funding provided by the Qatar National Library TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Umbrella review.

[Teeth autotransplantation as an alternative to dental implantation]. / Autotransplantatsiya zuba kak al'ternativa dental'noi implantatsii.

The stages of preoperative planning and surgical treatment of compromised teeth by the method of autotransplantation of a tooth are presented on the example of two clinical cases. The autotransplantation method can be considered an alternative to dental implantation when strictly adhering to the surgical protocol and careful selection of patients.

Long term outcomes of en-block autotransplantation of a tooth.

Repositioning of impacted teeth in the dental arch through en-bloc autotransplantation showed short-term efficacy of 89%. The objective of this study was to evaluate the technique for long-term efficacy. The analysis involved 23 teeth transplanted to the alveolar ridge through harvesting the tooth with the adjacent bone tissue. Development of the root was completed and the apical foramen was closed in all the teeth. The teeth were examined clinically and radiologically (CBCT) and compared to contralateral ones. The obtained data were analysed statistically. The efficacy of the procedure amounted to 81% including two teeth lost at an early stage and another two lost during follow-up. The mean age of patients upon performing the procedure was 29.8. The long-term follow-up amounted to the mean of 34.3 months. In the study group recession of 1-2 mm as well as 3-5 mm was found, which was not noted on the control group. In 11.1% of the study group teeth the external root resorption was observed. No transplanted tooth underwent root canal treatment, no periapical changes were observed at CBCT and 77.8% of those showed positive reaction to ethyl chloride. One case of ankylosis was observed in tooth 11 and in two cases increased mobility of the transplanted tooth was found. Regeneration of nerves as well as revascularization in the en-bloc autotransplantation proceeded with high predictability and the risk of ankylosis of the treated tooth seemed to be negligible. Gingival recession was observed more often in case of en-bloc transplantation compared to the control group. The long-term follow-up suggested that this the technique does not prevent external resorption in 100%.

Tooth autotransplantation: An umbrella review.

Tooth autotransplantation is a versatile procedure with several clinical applications among patients across different age groups. The success of this procedure depends on multiple factors. Despite the wealth of studies available, no single primary study or systematic review is able to report on every factor affecting the outcomes of autotransplantation. The aims of this umbrella review were to evaluate treatment-related and patient-related outcomes of autotransplantation and to assess the pre-, peri- or post-operative factors that could affect these. An umbrella review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. A literature search of five databases was performed up to 25 September 2022. Systematic Reviews (SR) with and without meta-analysis evaluating autotransplantation were included. Calibration among reviewers was carried out prior to study selection, data extraction and Risk of Bias (RoB) assessment. Study overlap was calculated using corrected covered area. Meta-meta-analysis (MMA) was performed for suitable SRs. The AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Seventeen SRs met the inclusion criteria. Only two SRs were suitable for conduct of MMA on autotransplantation of open apex teeth. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were >95%. A narrative summary on factors that could affect autotransplantation outcomes and comparisons of autotransplantation to other treatment options were reported. Five SRs were rated as 'low quality' and 12 SRs were rated as 'critically low quality' in the AMSTAR 2 RoB assessment. In order to facilitate a more homogenous pool of data for subsequent meta-analysis, an Autotransplantation Outcome Index was also proposed to standardise the definition of outcomes. Autotransplantation of teeth with open apices have a high survival rate. Future studies should standardise the reporting of clinical and radiographic findings, as well as the definition of outcomes.

Identifying important prognostic factors and outcomes for autotransplantation of developing teeth: Clinicians' perspectives.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Variability in the outcome measures used to assess the success of tooth autotransplantation presents challenges for combining data to examine the success of the technique. Reaching agreement on the most important outcomes will enable routine procedural and follow-up data to be collected in a standardised way. In turn this will promote greater data synthesis to evaluate outcomes and examine which procedural techniques influence outcome. The aim of this study was to identify which prognostic factors and outcomes are most important to clinicians with experience in autotransplantation of developing teeth. METHODS: The Delphi method was used to build consensus on the most important prognostic factors and outcomes. Item identification involved a systematic literature review and review of current clinical datasets in use. A two-round Delphi questionnaire was undertaken with clinicians providing tooth autotransplantation, followed by a consensus meeting to finalise the most important items. RESULTS: Outcomes and prognostic factors were identified from the systematic review (82 studies and eight reviews), one guideline and three existing clinical datasets. Patient interviews and a clinician survey added a number of items that would not have been identified from the literature only. A total of 56 outcomes and 93 prognostic factors were included for rating in the Delphi questionnaire. The Delphi questionnaire was completed by 15 respondents in round one and 13 respondents in round two. The consensus meeting was attended by nine participants. The final items that were judged to be most important included 29 outcomes (25 clinical, three patient-reported and one service delivery) and 49 prognostic factors (18 patient characteristics, four presurgical, 17 surgical and 10 postsurgical). Clinical outcomes were consistently rated higher than patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes rated as the most important were transplant survival and reason for failure, outcomes relating to pulp health, different types of resorption and evidence of infection (suppuration). Important patient-reported outcomes were satisfaction with overall treatment experience, and outcome and quality of life related to function of the transplanted tooth. Procedural information rated as being the most important related to the donor tooth: stage of root development, method for surgical removal and storage and condition of the donor tooth root surface following removal.

Autotransplantation of teeth with incomplete root formation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the survival of intentional autotransplantation of developing teeth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search was carried out in the MEDLINE database, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The criteria used are the ones described in the PRISMA Declaration. The following MeSH terms were used: ("tooth" [MeSH Terms] OR "tooth" [All Fields]) AND ("transplantation, autologous" [MeSH Terms] OR ("transplantation" [All Fields] AND "autologous" [All Fields]) OR "autologous transplantation" [All Fields] OR "autotransplantation" [All Fields]) AND ("humans" [MeSH Terms]. Randomised clinical trials and prospective and retrospective clinical studies were included. RESULTS: The meta-analytic study of overall survival included a total of 14 studies, yielding an overall survival rate of 97.9%. In studies with 1-year follow-ups, survival was 98%. The resulting 2-year follow-up rate was 97%, while the 5- and 10-year survival rates were 95.9% and 96.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The autotransplantation technique performed in a single-phase and on teeth that have not completed their development is a predictable technique, with a described survival rate at a 2-year follow-up of more than 97%. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The technique of dental autotransplantation is considered an important resource for the resolution and rehabilitation of tooth loss in patients, especially in those who are still in a growth period. Moreover, this technique has a low complication rate and a 10-year survival rate of 96.9%. It should therefore be considered a safe and reliable procedure.

Long-Term Survival Rate of Autogenous Tooth Transplantation: Up to 162 Months.

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to observe the usefulness of autogenous tooth transplantation by examining the cumulative survival rate according to the period of auto-transplanted teeth as pre-implant treatment. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 111 patients who visited Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital and underwent autogenous tooth transplantation between November 2008 and January 2021 (about 13 years). The cumulative survival rate of autogenous tooth transplantation according to the causes of extraction of the recipient tooth (caries, periapical lesion, crack, crown fracture, periodontitis) and condition of opposing teeth (natural teeth vs. fixed prosthesis). The cumulative survival rate of autogenous tooth transplantation according to the age (under 30 vs. over 30) was also investigated and it was examined whether there were any differences in each factor. Results: The average follow-up period was 12 months, followed by a maximum of 162 months. The 24-month cumulative survival rate of all auto-transplanted teeth was 91.7%, 83.1% at 60 months and the 162-month cumulative survival rate was 30.1%. There were no statistical differences between the causes of extraction of the recipient's teeth, differences in the condition of the opposing teeth, and differences under and over the age of 30. Conclusions: The survival rate of autogenous tooth transplantation appears to be influenced by the conditions of the donor tooth rather than the conditions of the recipient tooth. Although autogenous tooth transplantation cannot completely replace implant treatment, it is meaningful in that it can slightly delay or at least earn the time until implant placement is possible.

Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid scaffold loaded with plasmid DNA encoding fibroblast growth factor-2 promotes periodontal ligament regeneration of replanted teeth.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects of poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) loaded with plasmid DNA encoding fibroblast growth factor-2 (pFGF-2) on human periodontal ligament cells (hPDLCs) in vitro and evaluated the ability of the PLGA/pFGF-2 scaffold to promote periodontal ligament (PDL) regeneration in a beagle dog teeth avulsion animal model. BACKGROUND: Growth factor and scaffold play important roles in PDL regeneration. PLGA is a kind of biodegradable and biocompatible polymer that can be used as a carrier to deliver growth factors or genes. FGF-2 can induce potent proliferative responses, promote cell migration and regulate the production of extracellular matrix. Therefore, a gene-activated matrix composed of scaffold and genes is supposed to be a superior approach for promoting tissue regeneration. METHODS: In this study, PLGA and PLGA/pFGF-2 scaffolds were fabricated using electrospinning. The characterization of scaffolds was shown by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). dsDNA HS was used to test the plasmid release of PLGA/pFGF-2 scaffold. The viability and proliferation of hPDLCs on the two kinds of scaffolds were evaluated by the CCK-8 assay, and the expression of collagen I and scleraxis were analysed by RT-qPCR. The roots of avulsed teeth were covered by the two types of scaffolds and replanted into the alveolar pockets in beagles. Haematoxylin-eosin and Masson staining were used to evaluate the effects of PLGA/pFGF-2 scaffold on promoting PDL regeneration. RESULTS: The smooth and uniform fibres can be observed in both scaffolds, and the plasmids were randomly distributed in the PLGA/pFGF-2 scaffold. dsDNA HS analysis demonstrated that the PLGA/pFGF-2 scaffold released up to 123 ng pFGF-2 over 21 days in a sustained manner without any obvious burst release. The PLGA/pFGF-2 scaffold promoted the proliferation of hPDLCs and increased the expression levels of collagen I and scleraxis compared with PLGA scaffold. Animal experiments showed that more regular PDL-like tissues and less root surface resorption occurred in the PLGA/pFGF-2 scaffold group compared with the PLGA scaffold group. CONCLUSIONS: The PLGA/pFGF-2 scaffold promoted hPDLCs proliferation and facilitated periodontal ligament-related differentiation. The PLGA/pFGF-2 scaffold possesses excellent biological characteristics and could be used as a promising biomaterial for improving the treatment prognosis of replanted tooth.

Outcomes of autotransplanted teeth and prognostic factors: a 10-year retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical outcome of tooth autotransplantation and related prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two cases of transplanted teeth from March 2006 to December 2016 were retrospectively investigated by medical records and radiographs. The clinical outcomes of transplanted teeth, which included tooth survival, inflammatory root resorption (IRR), ankylosis, and marginal bone loss (MBL), and the related prognostic factors were assessed via survival analysis. RESULTS: The cumulative survival rate of transplanted teeth was 74% at 10 years after autotransplantation. According to Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the eruption state of the donor tooth, recipient position, and postoperative MBL were significantly related to tooth survival. The donor tooth position was significantly associated with IRR, the recipient position and the timing of orthodontic initiation with ankylosis, and the recipient position with MBL. CONCLUSIONS: Fully erupted donor teeth and a bounded recipient site were significantly associated with longer tooth survival. Periodontal healing and management to prevent postoperative MBL were as important for successful autotransplantation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge about the prognostic factors that are significantly associated with each particular clinical outcome may guide clinicians to achieve predictable and successful outcomes after tooth transplantation.

Long-term outcomes of autotransplantation of teeth: A case series.

The aim of autotransplantation of teeth (ATT) is to replace a lost tooth with a functional tooth within the same patient. Although it has recently become more of a recognized and viable treatment approach in dentistry, the long-term outcomes are still not well-documented. The principal author (MT) has performed more than 1000 ATTs for reasons such as treating missing teeth, deep caries, poor endodontic results, and periodontitis over the past 30 years in private practice. During the course of private practice, 2 separate analyses were performed on a total of 319 cases with follow-up ranging from 2 to 26 years. The results showed a tendency toward higher success rates in younger patients; the success rate was highest in ATTs performed on immature teeth (about 95%), about 90% in patients younger than 30 years of age and approximately 80% in patients older than 30. The failures were most often caused by replacement resorption (ie, ankylosis-related resorption). The purpose of this case series was to show successful long-term outcomes of ATT as well as to provide clinical insights and describe tendencies noted over the course of 30 years of performing ATTs.

Autotransplantation of teeth with incomplete root formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the rates of survival and success and the complications related to autotransplantation of teeth with incomplete root formation. Additionally, we attempted to identify the prognostic factors that influence the outcome of tooth autotransplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search for all data published until July 2016 was conducted. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were specified. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle checklist. Meta-analysis was performed by using the DerSimonian-Laird random effect model. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates and the weighted estimated survival, success, and complication rates per year were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were included for analysis. The survival rates reported after 1, 5, and 10 years were 97.4, 97.8, and 96.3%, respectively. The annual weighted estimated survival rate (98.2%), success rate (96.6%), and complication rates in terms of ankylosis (2.0%), root resorption (2.9%), and pulp necrosis (3.3%) were analyzed. No firm conclusions could be drawn with respect to the prognostic factors due to insufficient evidence of high quality. CONCLUSION: The survival and success rates of autotransplantation of teeth with incomplete root formation were high (> 95%), with a low rate of complications (< 5%). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Current evidence from the literature on autotransplantation of teeth with incomplete root formation shows favorable survival and success rates and low complication rates, indicating it is a reliable treatment option.

Clinical Efficacy of Tooth-Bone Graft: A Systematic Review and Risk of Bias Analysis of Randomized Control Trials and Observational Studies.

PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the clinical efficacy of the tooth-bone graft as a bone substitute in the oral and maxillofacial region in humans as compared to ungrafted sites and other bone substitutes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Databases were electronically and manually searched up to January 2017 to identify animal and human studies and a risk of bias analysis and descriptive statistics was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen animal controlled trials (401 animals), 4 human randomized controlled trials, 1 cohort study, and 3 controlled trials (184 patients) were included. Graft processing was highly heterogeneous. 71.42% clinical and 55.56% animal studies reported no significant difference between tooth-bone graft and controls. Histologically, a dentin-bone complex was reported. A low risk of bias was noted in only 50% of the randomized controlled trials and 63.33% animal study entries. An independent analysis of 6 high-quality case reports (350 patients) revealed complications in 18.86% cases. CONCLUSION: Tooth-bone graft demonstrated no added benefits over conventional graft materials. Absence of standardized processing and heterogeneous study results limit its use in clinical practice. Until long-term studies determine its success, clinicians are recommended to use it with caution because of high variability in resorption time (2-24 weeks) and a risk of graft dehiscence (12.96%-34.38%).

Autotransplantation of teeth to the anterior maxilla: A systematic review of survival and success, aesthetic presentation and patient-reported outcome.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Autotransplantation of teeth to the anterior maxilla may be indicated after trauma or in patients with congenitally missing teeth. The aim of this systematic review was to report the current evidence concerning survival and success rate, aesthetic outcome, and patient-reported outcome of autotransplanted teeth to the anterior maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE search followed by an additional hand search was performed to identify relevant literature. All levels of evidence except case reports were considered. Any publication reporting on 10 or more autotransplanted teeth to the anterior maxilla, and written in English were eligible for this systematic review. RESULTS: The systematic search identified 95 abstracts. Thirty-seven full-text articles were evaluated of which 17 could finally be included. Data on survival and success rate of the transplants could be extracted from 11 studies. Survival rates ranged between 93% and 100% (weighted mean: 96.7%, median: 100%) after 9 months to 22 years of observation (median: 8.75 years). No consensus regarding definition of success criteria of the transplants could be found in the literature. Two and four studies contained data on aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes, respectively. In general, they reported favourable aesthetic results and high patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The current available evidence suggests a high survival rate after autotransplantation of teeth to the anterior maxilla. However, the level of evidence is low. Limited data on aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes warrant additional research in this field.

Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Recently, bone graft materials using permanent teeth have come to light, and clinical and histological outcomes of this material have been confirmed by some studies. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the reliability of the autogenous tooth bone graft material applied to alveolar ridge augmentation procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of literature was conducted analyzing articles published between 2007 and 2017. The following four outcome variables were defined: a) implant stability b) post-operative complication c) evaluation of implant survival and failure rates, and d) histological analysis. A total of 108 articles were identified; 6 were selected for review. Based on the PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) model, the chief question of this study was: Can patients with alveolar ridge deficiency be successfully treated with the autogenous teeth used as bone graft? RESULTS: The mean primary stability of the placed implants was 67.3 ISQ and the mean secondary stability was 75.5 ISQ. The dehiscence of the wound was the most frequent complication with a rate of 29.1%. Of the 182 analyzed implants, the survival rate was 97.7% and the failure rate was 2.3%. In the histological analysis, most of studies reported bone formation. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence regarding the effects of autogenous teeth used for bone grafting to support any definitive conclusions, although it has been shown clinically safe and good bone forming capacity, and good results are shown about implant stability.

[An (un)conventional autogenous tooth transplantation]. / Een (on)conventionele autotransplantatie.

A 15-year-old boy was referred to an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department because of a persistent tooth 85 and a malposition of tooth 45. Following additional examination, it was concluded that the root formation of tooth 45 was already completed. Furthermore, it was horizontally impacted against the inferior border of the mandible. The decision was made to extract tooth 85 and to autotransplant tooth 45. Post-operatively, tooth 45 was fixed to the orthodontic equipment already in place and later treated endodontically. The success rate of this kind of autotransplantation of teeth with already closed apices (94%) is comparable in the literature to the success rate of autotransplantation of teeth with open apices (98%). Autotransplantation should be considered, especially in patients who are still growing and for whom dental implants do not (yet) offer a solution.

Success Rate of Autotransplantation of Teeth With an Open Apex: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to determine the success rate of autotransplanted permanent teeth with an open apex and to identify the most influential prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and SciELO databases was conducted for January 1990 to August 2015. The study eligibility criteria were primary studies that had evaluated patients with autotransplantation with an open apex, with or without preparation of the socket, and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. The principal outcome was the success rate of autotransplanted teeth with an open apex. Two of us independently performed the selection process and data extraction. The Effective Public Health Practice Project's Quality Assessment Tool was used for the quality assessment of the studies. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated, with the 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included in the present analysis. Of the 21 studies, 10 were retrospective and 11 were prospective. All the studies were of weak methodologic quality. The overall success rate was 89.68%, the survival rate was 98.21%, and the mean follow-up period was 6 years, 3 months (standard deviation 5.81 years). Among the prognostic factors analyzed, the premolars had a lower failure risk than did the molars (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.84). The stage of development of the root and the autotransplantation receptor site showed no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rate and survival were high, despite the methodologic limitations of the included studies. Further study is needed of the prognostic factors that influence the success of autotransplantation with an open apex.

Do Autotransplanted Teeth Require Elective Root Canal Therapy? A Long-Term Follow-Up Case Series.

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term survival and outcomes of 252 autotransplanted teeth with a novel root canal therapy (RCT) and follow-up protocol and to establish whether elective RCT after autotransplantation is routinely required for teeth with complete root formation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 209 patients 10 to 58 years old, with a total of 252 autotransplants was carried out with a minimum observational period of 1 year and a maximum period of 29 years. Patients were reviewed at specified intervals. Only the teeth showing any radiographic or clinical signs of internal resorption (IR), external resorption (ER), or pulpal necrosis underwent RCT. A failure was considered the loss or extraction of the autotransplanted tooth. RESULTS: Ten of the 252 autotransplants constituted failures, with 249, 190, 155, 97, 70, and 35 teeth surviving at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years, respectively; the remainder were lost to follow-up. Eighteen percent of teeth (n = 46) showed radiographic signs of IR, ER, and apical pathology (AP). Most cases of ER were observed by 3 years (18 of 28 teeth) and then at 5 to -8 years. Only 3 teeth showed signs of IR, which were observed within 5 years. Most cases of AP were observed within the first year (8 of 15 teeth) and then at 3 to 6 years. Five teeth showed signs of pulp obliteration or sclerosis and did not require RCT, with a maximum period of 16 years after identification of sclerosis. Retrospective analysis of the data showed that 184 autotransplanted teeth had complete root formation and 68 had incomplete root formation at the time of autotransplantation. Of the teeth that were followed for at least 5 years, 59.3% had complete root formation with no signs of pathology and required no RCT. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitation of this long-term study of patients lost to follow-up, the results suggest that, with close monitoring, some autotransplanted teeth with complete root formation that do not undergo RCT could have the potential for revascularization. Hence, one could reconsider the protocol of routinely providing RCT after autotransplantation. Future long-term studies will be beneficial to assess the vascularity of autotransplanted teeth using Doppler flowmetry with a larger cohort of patients.