Drug-induced atrial fibrillation. A narrative review of a forgotten adverse effect.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. There is clinical evidence that an increasing number of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular drugs, mainly anticancer drugs, can induce AF either in patients with or without pre-existing cardiac disorders, but drug-induced AF (DIAF) has not received the attention that it might deserve. In many cases DIAF is asymptomatic and paroxysmal and patients recover sinus rhythm spontaneously, but sometimes, DIAF persists, and it is necessary to perform a cardioversion. Furthermore, DIAF is not mentioned in clinical guidelines on the treatment of AF. The risk of DIAF increases in elderly and in patients treated with polypharmacy and with risk factors and comorbidities that commonly coexist with AF. This is the case of cancer patients. Under these circumstances ascribing causality of DIAF to a given drug often represents a clinical challenge. We review the incidence, the pathophysiological mechanisms, risk factors, clinical relevance, and treatment of DIAF. Because of the limited information presently available, further research is needed to obtain a deeper insight into DIAF. Meanwhile, it is important that clinicians are aware of the problem that DIAF represents, recognize which drugs may cause DIAF, and consider the possibility that a drug may be responsible for a new-onset AF episode.

Implementation of a tier system for IVIG indications to address IVIG shortage at a tertiary care pediatric medical center.

BACKGROUND: Drug shortages are a common issue that healthcare systems face and can result in adverse health outcomes for patients requiring inferior alternate treatment. The United States recently experienced a national drug shortage of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Several reported strategies to address the IVIG and other drug shortages have been proposed; however, there is a lack of evidence-based methods for protocol development and implementation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of introducing a multidisciplinary task force and tier system of indications and to minimize adverse effects during a shortage of IVIG. METHODS: Faculty members across disciplines with expertise in IVIG use were invited to participate in a task force to address the shortage and ensure adequate supply for emergent indications. A tier system of IVIG indications was established according to the severity of diagnosis, urgency of indication, and quality of supporting evidence. Based on inventory, indications in selected tiers were auto-approved. Orders that could not be automatically approved were escalated for task force review. RESULTS: Overall, there were 342 distinct requests for IVIG during the study period (August 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019). All Tier 1 indications were approved. Of all requests, only 2.6% (9) of requests were denied, none of which resulted in adverse effects based on retrospective chart review. Seven patients who regularly receive IVIG had possible adverse effects due to dose reduction or spacing of treatment; however, each complication was multifactorial and not attributed to the shortage or tier system implementation alone. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multidisciplinary task force and tier system to appropriately triage high-priority indications for limited pharmaceutical agents should be considered in health institutions faced with a drug shortage.

Thalidomide for management of refractory oral mucosal diseases.

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide has anti-inflammatory properties and has been used off-label for multiple mucocutaneous disorders, but its application in managing refractory oral mucosal diseases is unclear. This study aimed to review the efficacy and safety of thalidomide in treating various oral mucosal disorders refractory to conventional therapies. METHODS: The medical records of patients who were prescribed thalidomide from 2002 through 2021 for oral mucosal disorders were reviewed. Data collected included demographic characteristics, oral mucosal disease diagnosis, treatment courses, and thalidomide dose, duration, response, and side effects. RESULTS: Thalidomide was prescribed for 28 patients with diagnoses of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (n = 14), inflammatory oral lichenoid lesions (n = 6), traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stroma eosinophilia (n = 5), chronic radiation-induced mucositis (n = 2), and orofacial granulomatosis (n = 1). Patients were treated for a median duration of 84 days (range 2-1,582). Clinical improvement was observed in 19 of 22 patients who completed at least 1 cycle of thalidomide (86.4%), with complete resolution in 12 patients (54.5%). Adverse events occurred in 75% of patients (n = 21), with 8 requiring thalidomide discontinuation. The most common adverse events included peripheral neuropathy (42.9%), drowsiness (28.6%), and constipation (21.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Thalidomide may be considered for the management of refractory oral mucosal disorders. Drug side effects are common and need monitoring closely during use.

Achilles' Heel of currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors: immune related adverse events.

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the cancer treatment landscape by opening up novel avenues for intervention. As the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has exponentially increased, so have immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The mechanism of irAEs may involve the direct damage caused by monoclonal antibodies and a sequence of immune responses triggered by T cell activation. Common side effects include dermatologic toxicity, endocrine toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, and hepatic toxicity. While relatively rare, neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and pulmonary toxicity can be fatal. These toxicities pose a clinical dilemma regarding treatment discontinuation since they can result in severe complications and necessitate frequent hospitalization. Vigilant monitoring of irAEs is vital in clinical practice, and the principal therapeutic strategy entails the administration of oral or intravenous glucocorticoids (GSCs). It may be necessary to temporarily or permanently discontinue the use of ICIs in severe cases. Given that irAEs can impact multiple organs and require diverse treatment approaches, the involvement of a multidisciplinary team of experts is imperative. This review aims to comprehensively examine the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, incidence, and treatment options for various irAEs.

Cytomegalovirus Occurrence and Time-to-onset Analysis Under Bendamustine With Anti-CD20 Antibodies Using the JADER Database.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Patients with malignant lymphoma, in a latent state of weakened immune function, are at risk of chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Concomitant therapy with bendamustine and rituximab or obinutuzumab intensifies immunosuppression, potentially affecting CMV onset. This study aimed to assess CMV onset differences between bendamustine monotherapy and combination therapy with rituximab or obinutuzumab using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A JADER analysis dataset (April 2004 to September 2022) defined CMV infection using 31 preferred term (PT) words from MedDRA 25.1J HLT "Cytomegalovirus infection (10011827)". Reporting odds ratios (ROR) calculated CMV infection signals for bendamustine monotherapy, rituximab, obinutuzumab, bendamustine+rituximab (BR), and bendamustine+obinutuzumab (GB). ROR confidence intervals exceeding 1 indicated a CMV signal. Days of CMV infection were calculated based on adverse event onset and administration start. RESULTS: CMV signals were confirmed for monotherapy and combination therapies. CMV infection durations (median, interquartile range) were 41.0 days (23.5-69.5) for bendamustine monotherapy, 63.5 days (35.2-95.0) for BR, and 61.0 days (33.0-102.5) for GB, with cases exceeding 200 days. CONCLUSION: JADER analysis detected significant CMV signals for rituximab, obinutuzumab, and bendamustine. Caution may be warranted 7-9 months post-bendamustine administration, necessitating further investigation, including cell-mediated immunity suppression assessment.

Implementing HLA-B*58:01 testing prior to allopurinol initiation in Malaysian primary care setting: A qualitative study from doctors' and patients' perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Allopurinol, the first-line treatment for chronic gout, is a common causative drug for severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR). HLA-B*58:01 allele was strongly associated with allopurinol-induced SCAR in Asian countries such as Taiwan, Japan, Thailand and Malaysia. HLA-B*58:01 screening before allopurinol initiation is conditionally recommended in the Southeast-Asian population, but the uptake of this screening is slow in primary care settings, including Malaysia. This study aimed to explore the views and experiences of primary care doctors and patients with gout on implementing HLA-B*58:01 testing in Malaysia as part of a more extensive study exploring the feasibility of implementing it routinely. METHODS: This qualitative study used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to obtain information from patients with gout under follow-up in primary care and doctors who cared for them. Patients and doctors shared their gout management experiences and views on implementing HLA-B*58:01 screening in primary care. Data were coded and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: 18 patients and 18 doctors from three different healthcare settings (university hospital, public health clinics, private general practitioner clinics) participated. The acceptability to HLA-B*58:01 screening was good among the doctors and patients. We discovered inadequate disclosure of severe side effects of allopurinol by doctors due to concerns about medication refusal by patients, which could potentially be improved by introducing HLA-B*58:01 testing. Barriers to implementation included out-of-pocket costs for patients, the cost-effectiveness of this implementation, lack of established alternative treatment pathway besides allopurinol, counselling burden and concern about genetic data security. Our participants preferred targeted screening for high-risk populations instead of universal screening. CONCLUSION: Implementing HLA-B*58:01 testing in primary care is potentially feasible if a cost-effective, targeted screening policy on high-risk groups can be developed. A clear treatment pathway for patients who test positive should be made available.

A prospective observational study of estimating drug related problems and clinical outcomes in subtypes of stroke patients.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a neurological disease and a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Strokes mainly consist of two types: hemorrhage and ischemia. Stroke patients are being administered multiple drug therapy and are at risk of drug-related problems. AIM: To estimate drug-related problems (DRPs) and clinical end outcomes in hospitalized stroke patients. METHODS: Current study was a multicenter, cross-sectional prospective observational study including 250 stroke patients admitted to tertiary care hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. The study included all clinical subtypes of stroke patients i.e. Stroke, Ischemic stroke, Hemorrhagic stroke, CVA, and TIA. Associations among patient-clinical end outcomes and drug therapy-related variables like DRPs, mortality, and morbidity rates were estimated using Pearson's chi-squared test. Statistical analysis was done by using SPSS software, version 25. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients participated in this study suffering from different clinical subtypes of stroke i.e. Ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, TIA, and CVA, including 46% male and 54% female patients. The majority of patients' stay at the hospital was between 1-10 days. The overall mortality rate in stroke patients was 51%. HAIs were observed in 70% of patients, HAIs faced by patients were SAP, CAP, UTI, sepsis, and VAP. Drugs were assessed according to NEML i.e. access group antibiotics, watch group antibiotics, reserve group antibiotics, statins, antiepileptics, and proton pump inhibitors. Majorly ceftriaxone was administered to 79% of patients, piperacillin-tazobactam to 52%, and cefixime to 48%, whereas meropenem was administered to 42% of patients along with vancomycin to 39% of total patients. A high mortality rate was observed in the case of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus i.e. 78% and in the case of streptococcus pneumoniae 61% mortality rate was observed. Due to the presence of DRPs and various other clinical factors like comorbidities, DDIs, HAIs, administration of potentially nephrotoxic drugs, and administration of antibiotics without having CST, hospitalized stroke patients faced many problems. CONCLUSION: This study helped determine DRPs along with various clinical factors affecting the clinical end outcomes of patients suffering from any clinical subtype of stroke. Due to the enhancement in the evidence of the incidence of DRPs in tertiary care hospitals, pharmacist-led drug therapy review by interfering with doctors and other medical professionals at the patient bed site is needed and should be done to avoid any negative end outcomes and serious issues related to DRPs.

Adverse drug reactions attributed to generic substitution of antiretroviral medications among HIV treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis clients in British Columbia, Canada.

BACKGROUND: In British Columbia, antiretrovirals (ARVs) for HIV treatment (HIV-Tx) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are free-of-charge through publicly-funded Drug Treatment Programs (DTPs). When available, less costly generics are substituted for brand-name ARVs. We describe the incidence and type of product substitution issue (PSI) adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to generic ARVs. METHODS: Cohorts included DTP clients ≥19 years who received generic ARVs for HIV-Tx (abacavir-lamivudine, emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, atazanavir or darunavir between 01 Jun 2017 and 30 Jun 2022) or PrEP (emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, 01 Apr 2018 to 30 Jun 2022). Demographic, ARV and ADR data were extracted from DTP databases and summarized by descriptive statistics. PSI incidence was calculated for each product during the year following brand-to-generic and generic-to-generic transitions (first-year-post-rollout), and compared between generic versions using generalized estimating equations. For context, incidence of any ARV product-related ADR was calculated in the same 1-year periods. RESULTS: During first-year-post-rollout periods, 5339 HIV-Tx (83% male, median age 52 years) and 8095 PrEP (99% male, median 33 years) clients received generic ARVs, and reported 78 and 23 generic PSIs, respectively. PSI incidence was <1% for most generic ARVs, with mild-moderate symptoms including gastrointestinal upset, headache, dizziness, fatigue/malaise and skin rash. In HIV-Tx clients, the efavirenz-containing product had higher PSI incidence than other ARVs (2.2%, p = .004), due to more neuropsychiatric adverse reactions. Any ADR incidence was stable across measurement periods, and generic PSIs represented less than one third of all product-related ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Generic substitution of antiretrovirals for HIV-Tx and PrEP was well tolerated, with ≤2% incidence of mild-moderate PSI ADRs.

Adverse drug reactions in children and adolescents on daily antitubercular regimen: An observational longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVES: Subsequent to introduction of daily fixed dose combination (FDC) regimen with increased dosages and inclusion of ethambutol in continuation phase of antitubercular therapy (ATT) in India, this study was done to evaluate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in children and adolescents. METHODS: Longitudinal observational study conducted in tertiary teaching hospital. Children (1 month-18 year), with newly diagnosed drug sensitive tuberculosis, started on daily FDC regimen of ATT, were included. Participants were followed up at 2 weeks, 8 weeks and 6 months. Division of AIDS (DAIDS) severity grading and World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) causality assessment was done. RESULTS: In 99 participants, 29 experienced ADRs. Most commonly ADRs involved hepatobiliary (11.1%) and gastrointestinal (8.1%) systems. Grade 3 severity noted in 35.5% ADRs. Certain causality classified in 19.3%. Presence of ADRs was significantly higher in participants with vs without malnutrition [40.5% vs 21.1% (p = 0.036)]. Tendency for more severe ADRs noted in participants with vs without malnutrition [Grade 3 ADRs out of all ADRs: 64.7% vs 0% (p < 0.001)]. CONCLUSION: Incidence and severity of ADRs has increased after introduction of daily FDC of ATT. Most common ADR observed were hepatobiliary. Malnutrition and less weight for age were risk factors for occurrence and severity of ADRs.

Uso de Ivermectina e Atazanavir no tratamento da Covid-19: uma revisão de escopo / Use of Ivermectin and Atazanavir in the treatment of Covid-19: a scoping review / Uso de Ivermectina y Atazanavir en el tratamiento de Covid-19: una revisión de alcance

Objetivo: Examinar e mapear as evidências científicas sobre a eficácia do uso de ivermectina e atazanavir no tratamento de COVID-19. Metodologia: Scoping Review, baseado nos procedimentos recomendados pelo Instituto Joanna Briggs. Estabeleceu-se a pergunta norteadora: "Quais são as evidências científicas sobre o uso de ivermectina e atazanavir no tratamento de pacientes com sintomas leves de COVID-19?". Foram realizadas buscas em seis bases de dados nacionais e internacionais, sobre trabalhos publicados até dezembro de 2022. Dos 357 estudos encontrados, 22 foram selecionados para leitura na íntegra, resultando em uma amostra final de 11 estudos analisados. Resultados: As 11 publicações analisadas foram publicadas de 2020 a 2022 durante período pandêmico, de âmbito nacional e internacional com delineamento de estudos experimentais, do tipo ensaio clínico com randomização. Apenas 03 estudos (25%) testaram o atazanavir como intervenção conjugada a outras drogas, não evidenciando melhorias significativas em relação ao seu uso. Já no tratamento com Ivermectina, dos oito (75%) estudos que a testaram, apenas três (37,5%) recomendaram seu uso e cinco (62,5%) não suportam seu uso para tratamento de COVID-19 leve. O tempo de resolução dos sintomas variou de 8 a 10 dias nos braços tratados com ivermectina e em média 07 dias no tratamento com atazanavir. Não se detectou eventos adversos graves relacionados ao uso das duas drogas. Conclusão: As evidências que recomendavam o uso de ivermectina datam do início do período pandêmico, 2020, mas posteriormente, com a realização de ensaios clínicos robustos e controlados, novas evidências não suportam o uso de ivermectina e atazanavir no tratamento de COVID-19 leve mostrando que não houve diferença no tempo de resolução dos sintomas, na taxa de mortalidade, taxa de internação na UTI e tempo de hospitalização.

Objective: To examine and map the scientific evidence on the effectiveness of using ivermectin and atazanavir in the treatment of COVID-19. Methodology: Scoping Review, based on the procedures recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The guiding question was established, "What is the scientific evidence on the use of ivermectin and atazanavir in the treatment of patients with mild symptoms of COVID-19?" Searches were conducted in six national and international databases on papers published until December 2022. Of the 357 studies found, 22 were selected for reading in full, resulting in a final sample of 11 studies analyzed. Results: The 11 publications analyzed were published from 2020 to 2022 during pandemic period, of national and international scope with experimental study design, of clinical trial type with randomization. Only 03 studies (25%) tested atazanavir as a combined intervention with other drugs, showing no significant improvements in relation to its use. As for the treatment with Ivermectin, of the eight (75%) studies that tested it, only three (37.5%) recommended its use and five (62.5%) did not support its use for treating mild COVID-19. The time to symptom resolution ranged from 8 to 10 days in the ivermectin-treated arms and on average 07 days in the atazanavir treatment. No serious adverse events related to the use of the two drugs were detected. Conclusion: evidence recommending the use of ivermectin dates back to the beginning of the pandemic period, 2020, but subsequently, with robust controlled clinical trials, new evidence does not support the use of ivermectin and atazanavir in the treatment of mild COVID-19 showing that there was no difference in time to symptom resolution, mortality rate, ICU admission rate, and length of hospital stay.

Objetivo: Examinar y mapear la evidencia científica sobre la eficacia del uso de ivermectina y atazanavir en el tratamiento de COVID-19. Metodología: Scoping Review, basada en los procedimientos recomendados por el Instituto Joanna Briggs. La pregunta guía era: "¿Cuál es la evidencia científica sobre el uso de ivermectina y atazanavir en el tratamiento de pacientes con síntomas leves de COVID-19? Se realizaron búsquedas en seis bases de datos nacionales e internacionales, en artículos publicados hasta diciembre de 2022. De los 357 estudios encontrados, se seleccionaron 22 para su lectura completa, lo que dio lugar a una muestra final de 11 estudios analizados. Resultados: Las 11 publicaciones analizadas fueron publicadas entre 2020 y 2022 durante el periodo pandémico, de ámbito nacional e internacional con diseño de estudio experimental, de tipo ensayo clínico con aleatorización. Apenas 03 estudios (25%) probaron el atazanavir como intervención combinada con otras drogas, sin evidenciar mejoras significativas en relación con su uso. En cuanto al tratamiento con Ivermectina, de los ocho (75%) estudios que la probaron, sólo tres (37,5%) recomendaron su uso y cinco (62,5%) no apoyaron su uso para tratar la COVID-19 leve. El tiempo transcurrido hasta la resolución de los síntomas osciló entre 8 y 10 días en los brazos tratados con ivermectina y una media de 07 días en el tratamiento con atazanavir. No se detectaron acontecimientos adversos graves relacionados con el uso de los dos fármacos. Conclusión: las pruebas que recomiendan el uso de ivermectina se remontan al inicio del periodo pandémico, 2020, pero posteriormente, con ensayos clínicos controlados sólidos, las nuevas pruebas no apoyan el uso de ivermectina y atazanavir en el tratamiento de la COVID-19 leve, lo que demuestra que no hubo diferencias en el tiempo hasta la resolución de los síntomas, la tasa de mortalidad, la tasa de ingreso en la UCI y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria.

Múltiples reacciones adversas graves a fármacos en un paciente luego de la infección por COVID-19: informe de un caso / Drug-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions in a patient after COVID-19 infection: case report

Durante la pandemia por COVID-19 se observaron diversas reacciones adversas a fármacos. Esto pudo haber estado relacionado con una mayor susceptibilidad inmunológica de los pacientes con SARS-CoV-2 a presentar este tipo de cuadros, así como también con la exposición a múltiples medicamentos utilizados en su tratamiento. Comunicamos el caso de un paciente con una infección respiratoria grave por COVID-19, que presentó 2 reacciones adversas graves a fármacos en un período corto de tiempo. (AU)

During the COVID-19 pandemic, various adverse drug reactions were observed. This could have been related to a greater immunological susceptibility of patients with SARS-CoV-2 to present this type of symptoms, as well as exposure to multiple drugs used in their treatment. We report the case of a patient with a severe respiratory infection due to COVID-19, who presented 2 serious adverse drug reactions associated with paracetamol in a short period of time. (AU)

Statin-related drug-induced liver injury / 中华肝脏病杂志

Statins are a kind of prescription drug that is widely used to treat hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and other atherosclerotic diseases. A common side effect of statin use is a mild rise in liver aminotransferases, which occurs in less than 3% of patients. Statin-related liver injury is most commonly caused by atorvastatin and simvastatin, but severe liver injury is uncommon. Therefore, understanding and evaluating hepatotoxicity and weighing the benefits and risks is of great significance to better realize the protective effect of statins.

A Real-world Study on the Incidence and Outcome of Immune-related Adverse Events in Lung Cancer Patients / 中国肺癌杂志

BACKGROUND@#Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are commonly occurred in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, evidence of irAEs derived from the Chinese population is relatively lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and outcomes of irAEs in Chinese patients with lung cancer after receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).@*METHODS@#Clinical and follow-up data from lung cancer patients who received at least one time of ICIs from January 2018 to September 2021 at Huadong Hospital, Fudan University were included. Statistical descriptions and Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze the overall incidence of irAEs, as well as the incidence and outcomes of each type of irAEs.@*RESULTS@#135 patients were included in the study. 106 patients (78.5%) presented at least one type of irAEs, and the median time to first irAEs onset was 28 d. Most irAEs occurred at early time after treatment, and most irAEs were mild-moderate and reversible. 57 patients (42.2%) died at the study cutoff. The mortality rate of severe irAEs was 12.6% (n=17), and among them 7 patients (41.2%) died of pneumonitis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) time of the total population was 505 d (95%CI: 352-658) and 625 d (95%CI: 491-759), respectively. Patients who presented any irAEs achieved a longer PFS than those who did not (median PFS: 533 d vs 179 d, P=0.037, HR=0.57), while patients who presented skin toxicities achieved a longer OS than patients who did not (median OS: 797 d vs 469 d, P=0.006, HR=0.70).@*CONCLUSIONS@#In real-world settings, irAEs in lung cancer patients were commonly observed, with pneumonitis as the most common fatal irAEs. In addition, patients who presented any irAEs may tend to achieve a longer PFS.

Análise de intervenções farmacêuticas utilizando um instrumento de acompanhamento farmacêutico em uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica / Analysis of pharmaceutical interventions using a pharmaceutical monitoring instrument in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Introdução: A pediatria apresenta um cenário bastante específico devido ao uso de medicamentos off-label e carência de estudos científicos direcionados à utilização de medicamentos por essa população. Assim, o farmacêutico clínico pode contribuir na identificação e prevenção de problemas relacionados a medicamentos.Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo realizado em uma unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica de um hospital universitário do Rio Grande do Sul. Foram analisadas as intervenções farmacêuticas realizadas entre março de 2016 a julho de 2018 por farmacêuticos clínicos. Tais intervenções foram reclassificadas conforme os critérios de um instrumento de acompanhamento farmacêutico (bundle) utilizado na rotina. Foi realizada análise estatística descritiva das variáveis estudadas.Resultados: Das 582 intervenções farmacêuticas analisadas, as categorias mais prevalentes foram dose (n = 97; 16,7%), necessidade (n = 92; 15,8%) e forma farmacêutica (n = 56; 9,6%). Após reclassificação das intervenções farmacêuticas utilizando o bundle, os critérios mais prevalentes foram: critério 1 (revisão da farmacoterapia; n = 285; 49%), critério 4 (analgesia; n = 78; 13,4%) e critério 10 (antimicrobianos; n = 65; 11,2%). As classes de medicamentos mais frequentes foram os do sistema nervoso (n = 213; 36,6%) e os anti-infecciosos gerais para uso sistêmico (n = 115; 19,8%). A taxa de adesão das intervenções farmacêuticas pela equipe médica foi de 85,1%.Conclusão: A classificação das intervenções farmacêuticas utilizando o bundle pode contribuir no aperfeiçoamento do instrumento tornando-o mais viável para uso na unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica e direcionar o trabalho do farmacêutico clínico nas situações que geram mais problemas relacionados a medicamentos.

Introduction: Pharmaceutical interventions in the pediatric setting are highly peculiar due to the use of off-label drugs associated with the lack of scientific studies on the use of drug therapies in this population. Thus, clinical pharmacists may help identify and prevent drug-related problems.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the pediatric intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Pharmaceutical interventions conducted between March 2016 and July 2018 were analyzed by clinical pharmacists. These interventions were reclassified according to the criteria of a routine pharmaceutical monitoring instrument (care bundle). We conducted a descriptive statistical analysis of study variables.Results: Of 582 pharmaceutical interventions analyzed, the most prevalent categories were dose adjustment (n = 97; 16.7%), need for drug therapy (n = 92; 15.8%), and dosage forms (n = 56; 9.6%). After reclassification of pharmaceutical interventions, the most prevalent criteria were criterion 1 (review of drug therapy; n = 285; 49%), criterion 4 (analgesia; n = 78; 13.4%), and criterion 10 (antimicrobials; n = 65; 11.2%). The most common drug classes were nervous system agents (n = 213; 36.6%) and anti-infectives for systemic use (n = 115; 19.8%). The rate of adherence to pharmaceutical interventions by the medical team was 85.1%.Conclusions: The classification of pharmaceutical interventions according to the pharmaceutical care bundle may help improve the instrument, allowing its use in the pediatric intensive care unit and guiding clinical pharmacists in situations causing drug-related problems.

Adverse effects associated with favipiravir in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a retrospective study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Favipiravir is generally used in treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia in Turkey. OBJECTIVE: To determine the side effects of favipiravir and whether it is a good treatment option. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study conducted in Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: 357 patients who completed favipiravir treatment at the recommended dose were included. 37 patients with drug side effects and 320 patients without drug side effects were examined in two groups. RESULTS: Side effects were observed in 37 (10.36%) out of 357 patients using favipiravir. The most common side effect was liver dysfunction, in 26 (7.28%) of the patients. The following other side effects were also observed: diarrhea (1.4%), nausea (0.84%), abdominal pain (0.28%) and thrombocytopenia (0.28%). One patient (0.28%) presented both increased transaminases and nausea. CONCLUSION: In this study, it was determined that favipiravir may constitute an alternative for treating COVID-19 pneumonia given that its side effects are generally well tolerated and not serious.

Can acupuncture enhance therapeutic effectiveness of antidepressants and reduce adverse drug reactions in patients with depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis / 中西医结合学报

BACKGROUND@#Some depressed patients receive acupuncture as an adjunct to their conventional medications.@*OBJECTIVE@#This review aims to provide evidence on whether acupuncture can enhance the therapeutic effectiveness of antidepressants for treating depression, and explore whether acupuncture can reduce the adverse reactions associated with antidepressants.@*SEARCH STRATEGY@#English and Chinese databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until December 1, 2021.@*INCLUSION CRITERIA@#RCTs with a modified Jadad scale score ≥ 4 were included if they compared a group of participants with depression that received acupuncture combined with antidepressants with a control group that received antidepressants alone.@*DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS@#Meta-analysis was performed, and statistical heterogeneity was assessed based on Cochran's Q statistic and its related P-value. Primary outcomes were the reduction in the severity of depression and adverse reactions associated with antidepressants, while secondary outcomes included remission rate, treatment response, social functioning, and change in antidepressant dose. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to evaluate the overall quality of evidence in the included studies.@*RESULTS@#This review included 16 studies (with a total of 1958 participants). Most studies were at high risk of performance bias and at low or unclear risk of selection bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and other bias. Analysis of the 16 RCTs showed that, compared with antidepressants alone, acupuncture along with antidepressants reduced the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAMD-17) scores (standard mean difference [SMD] -0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.55 to -0.33, P < 0.01; I2 = 14%), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.23, P < 0.01; I2 = 79%), and the Side Effect Rating Scale (SERS) scores (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -1.56 to -0.66, P < 0.01; I2 = 89%). Compared with antidepressants alone, acupuncture along with antidepressants improved World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF scores (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.44, P < 0.01; I2 = 15%), decreased the number of participants who increased their antidepressant dosages (relative risk [RR] 0.32, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.48, P < 0.01; I2 = 0%), and resulted in significantly higher remission rates (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.83, P < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and treatment responses (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.47, P < 0.01; I2 = 19%) in terms of HAMD-17 scores. The HAMD-17, SDS and SERS scores were assessed as low quality by GRADE and the other indices as being of moderate quality.@*CONCLUSION@#Acupuncture as an adjunct to antidepressants may enhance the therapeutic effectiveness and reduce the adverse drug reactions in patients receiving antidepressants. These findings must be interpreted with caution, as the evidence was of low or moderate quality and there was a lack of comparative data with a placebo control.@*SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION@#INPLASY202150008.

Síndrome del hombre rojo en pediatría: a propósito de 2 casos / Syndrome of the red man in pediatrics: a report of 2 cases

Describimos dos casos de aparición de síndrome de hombre rojo o cuello rojo (SHR) en población pediátrica, una lactante de 3 meses y un niño de 12 años. En ambos pacientes se sustituyó vancomicina por otro glucopéptido, teicoplanina, sin haberse presentado este síndrome en ninguna de sus administraciones a pesar de la semejanza estructural existente entre ambos fármacos. (AU)

We describe two cases of red man or red neck syndrome (RRS) appearance in paediatric population, an infant of 3 months and a child of 12 years. In both patients vancomycin was replaced by another glycopeptide, teicoplanin, without this syndrome having occurred in any of their administrations despite the structural similarity between two drugs. (AU)

Reacciones cutáneas adversas graves en la infancia / Severe adverse skin reactions in the childhood

RESUMEN Las reacciones cutáneas a drogas son cada vez más frecuentes en edades pediátricas, con un alto impacto en la salud de los niños. Pueden manifestarse en formas muy disímiles, desde un exantema transitorio hasta cuadros graves con afectación multisistémica potencialmente fatales. En la presente revisión se hace énfasis en las farmacodermias graves en la infancia, con el objetivo de promover el conocimiento por parte del personal médico para facilitar su diagnóstico y tratamiento oportuno. Se desarrolló una búsqueda en la Biblioteca Virtual de Salud de Infomed y en Google: se revisaron 28 trabajos científicos sin limitación de año y país, 24 de ellos pertenecen a los últimos cinco años y de estos 17 a los últimos tres. El dominio de los elementos para el diagnóstico precoz y las opciones terapéuticas son indispensables para elegir la conducta adecuada frente a estas reacciones cutáneas graves y disminuir la morbimortalidad por estas afecciones (AU).

ABSTRACT Skin reactions to drugs are increasingly common at pediatric ages, with a high impact on children's health. They can appear in very dissimilar forms, from a transient rash to serious pictures with potentially fatal multisystem involvement. This review focuses on severe pharmacodermies in the childhood, with the aim of promoting medical staff knowledge to facilitate their timely diagnosis and treatment. A search was led in the Infomed Virtual Health Library and in Google: 28 scientific papers were reviewed without limitation of year and country, 24 of them belong to the last five years and from these 17 to the last three. Mastery of the elements for early diagnosis and therapeutic options are indispensable to choose the appropriate behavior against these serious skin reactions and to decrease morbidity and mortality due to these conditions (AU).

Antagonistas periféricos de los receptores opioides Mu en el tratamiento del estreñimiento inducido por opioides: revisión / Peripheral acting Mu opioid receptor antagonists in the treatment of the opioid-induced constipation: review

El estreñimiento inducido por opioides (EIO) constituye un problema clínico emergente que empeora la calidad de vida de los pacientes que requieren el uso de opioides para el manejo del dolor. Diferentes fármacos se han comercializado como antagonistas de los receptores opioides Mu periféricos, conocidos con el nombre de Peripheral Acting Mu Opioid Receptor Antagonists o PAMORA (metilnaltrexona, alvimopam y más recientemente naloxegol), que permiten la antagonización de los efectos periféricos de los opioides sin interferir en su efecto analgésico. Tanto metilnaltrexona como naloxegol han sido aprobados para el tratamiento del EIO, mientras que alvimopan está aprobado para la recuperación gastrointestinal después de resección intestinal con anastomosis primaria. Todos ellos han mostrado su eficacia clínica, pero es debatido el papel que han de tener en la estrategia global del manejo del EIO. Se revisa la información disponible sobre los PAMORA y se propone estrategia de uso clínico

The opioid induced constipation (OIC) is an emerging clinical problems that worsen the patients' quality of life requiring opioids for their pain relief. Many drugs have been launched as Peripheral Acting Mu Opioid Receptor Antagonists o PAMORAs (metylnaltrexone, alvimopam and more recently naloxegol), which antagonize the peripheral effects of opioids without affecting the opioids analgesia. Metylnaltrenone and naloxegol have been licensed for the treatment of CIO, meanwhile alvimopam is approved for the recovery of postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery. All PAMORAs have shown clinical efficacy but is a matter of debate wich should be their role in the manangement of the CIO. The available information about PAMORAs is reviewed and informed strategy on the use of these drugs is proposed