RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women remain underrepresented in leadership roles, faculty roles, and among residents in orthopaedic surgery. It has been suggested that having women in leadership positions in orthopaedic surgery may help to increase the gender diversity of residency programs. However, to our knowledge, no study has explored the relationship, if any, between the gender of the residency program director and the percentage of women in the residency program. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is the program director's gender associated with differences in the percentage of women orthopaedic surgery residents? (2) Do women and men differ in the time to appointment of program director? METHODS: A list of 207 orthopaedic surgery residencies was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) website for the academic year 2021 to 2022. The study excluded 6% (13) of programs; 4% (8) were those without ACGME accreditation and those with initial accreditation, and 2% (5) did not have updated 2021 to 2022 resident lists. Descriptive information on 194 programs was obtained from publicly accessible resources from July 2021 through July 2022. The institution's website and the American Medical Association's (AMA) Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA) was used to collect residency program characteristics and resident demographics [ 2 ]. Doximity, Healthgrades, and LinkedIn were used to further collect current orthopaedic surgery residency program director demographics, including gender, age, and education/training history. To determine gender, photographs and pronouns (she/her/hers or he/him/hers) used in their biographies were used first. To confirm this, secondary sources were used including their NPI profile, which lists gender; Doximity; and their LinkedIn profile. Scopus was used to analyze research output by the program directors-using the Hirsch index (h-index) as the primary bibliometric metric. A total of 194 program directors were identified, of whom of 12% (23) were women and 88% (171) were men. Of the 4421 total residents among these programs, 20% (887) were women and 80% (3534) were men. A univariate analysis comparing program directors was conducted, with continuous variables analyzed using an independent-sample t-test and categorical variables analyzed using a Pearson chi-square test. With the numbers available, a post hoc statistical power calculation indicated that we could detect an 32% difference in the percentage of women in a program as significant with 80% power at the p < 0.05 level, whereas we might have been underpowered to discern smaller differences than that. RESULTS: With the numbers available, we found no difference in the percentage of women in residency programs run by women program directors than in programs in which the program director was a man (22% [125 of 558] versus 20% [762 of 3863], mean difference 2% [95% CI -1.24% to 7.58%]; p = 0.08). Comparing women to men program directors, women had fewer years between residency completion and appointment to the position of program director (8 ± 2 years versus 12 ± 7 years, mean difference 4 years [95% CI 2.01 to 7.93 years]; p = 0.02) and had a lower mean h-index (7 ± 4 versus 11 ± 11, mean difference 4 [95% CI 1.70 to 6.56]; p = 0.03) and number of publications (24 ± 23 versus 41 ± 62, mean difference 17 [95% CI 3.98 to 31.05]; p = 0.01), although they did not differ in terms of their advanced degrees, duration of training, or likelihood of having taken a fellowship. CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic residency programs that were run by women did not contain a higher percentage of women residents, suggesting that the gender of the individual in that role may not be as important as has been speculated by others. Future studies should investigate the intersectionality of gender, race, and ethnicity of residents, program directors, and current faculty. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The fact that women were placed in program director roles earlier in career may also carry special jeopardy for them. Those roles are difficult and can impair a faculty member's ability to conduct individual research, which often is key to further academic promotions. Given that and the fact that the gender of the program director was not associated with differences in gender composition of residency programs, we believe that increasing mentorship and access to pipeline programs will help promote diversity in residency programs.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Liderazgo , Ortopedia , Médicos Mujeres , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Ortopedia/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Estados Unidos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/educación , Factores Sexuales , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Equidad de Género , Acreditación , Sexismo , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/educaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric orthopaedic fellowship directors (FDs) have a valuable impact on the education of trainees and future leaders in the field. There is currently no research on the characteristics of pediatric orthopaedic FDs. METHODS: Programs were identified using the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America fellowship directory. Operative, nonoperative, and specialty programs were included. Data was collected through Qualtrics survey, e-mail, telephone, and online searches. Variables included demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity), Hirsch index (h-index) as a measure of research productivity, graduate education, residency and fellowship training, years of hire at current institution and as FD, and leadership roles. RESULTS: Fifty-five FDs were identified. The majority (49/55, 89%) were male and 77% (27/35) were Caucasian. The mean age at survey was 51.1±8.2 years. The mean h-index was 17.2. Older age correlated with higher h-index (r=0.48, P=0.0002). The average duration from fellowship graduation to FD appointment was 9.6±6.7 and 6.9±6.1 years from institutional hire. Sixteen FDs (29%) had additional graduate level degrees. Almost all (52/55, 95%) FDs completed orthopaedic surgery residencies and all graduated fellowship training. Twenty-nine percent (16/55) completed more than 1 fellowship. Most FDs (51/55, 93%) completed a fellowship in pediatric orthopaedic surgery. Ten FDs (18%) completed pediatric orthopaedic surgery fellowships that included spine-specific training. One-third of all current FDs were fellowship-trained at either Boston Children's Hospital (9/55, 16%) or Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children (9/55, 16%). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric orthopaedic FDs are typically early-career to mid-career when appointed, with a strong research background. Nearly a third completed additional graduate degrees or multiple fellowships. Although male dominated, there are more female FDs leading pediatric orthopaedic programs compared with adult reconstruction, trauma, and spine fellowships. As fellowships continue to grow and diversify, this research will provide a baseline to determine changes in FD leadership.
Asunto(s)
Becas/organización & administración , Liderazgo , Ortopedia/educación , Pediatría/educación , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have identified significant gender discrepancies in grant funding, leadership positions, and publication impact in surgical subspecialties. We investigated whether these discrepancies were also present in academic vascular surgery. METHODS: Academic websites from institutions with vascular surgery training programs were queried to identify academic faculty, and leadership positions were noted. H-index, number of citations, and total number of publications were obtained from Scopus and PubMed. Grant funding amounts and awards data were obtained from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Society for Vascular Surgery websites. Industry funding amount was obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website. Nonsurgical physicians and support staff were excluded from this analysis. RESULTS: We identified 177 female faculty (18.6%) and 774 male faculty (81.4%). A total of 41 (23.2%) female surgeons held leadership positions within their institutions compared with 254 (32.9%) male surgeons (P = .009). Female surgeons held the rank of assistant professor 50.3% of the time in contrast to 33.9% of men (P < .001). The rank of associate professor was held at similar rates, 25.4% vs 20.7% (P = .187), respectively. Fewer women than men held the full professor rank, 10.7% compared with 26.2% (P < .001). Similarly, women held leadership positions less often than men, including division chief (6.8% vs 13.7%; P < .012) and vice chair of surgery (0% vs 2.2%; P < .047), but held more positions as vice dean of surgery (0.6% vs 0%; P < .037) and chief executive officer (0.6% vs 0%; P < .037). Scientific contributions based on the number of each surgeon's publications were found to be statistically different between men and women. Women had an average of 42.3 publications compared with 64.8 for men (P < .001). Female vascular surgeons were cited an average of 655.2 times, less than half the average citations of their male counterparts with 1387 citations (P < .001). The average H-index was 9.5 for female vascular surgeons compared with 13.7 for male vascular surgeons (P < .001). Correcting for years since initial board certification, women had a higher H-index per year in practice (1.32 vs 1.02; P = .005). Female vascular surgeons were more likely to have received NIH grants than their male colleagues (9.6% vs 4.0%; P = .017). Although substantial, the average value of NIH grants awarded was not statistically significant between men and women, with men on average receiving $915,590.74 ($199,119.00-$2,910,600.00) and women receiving $707,205.35 ($61,612.00-$4,857,220.00; P = .416). There was no difference in the distribution of Society for Vascular Surgery seed grants to women and men since 2007. Industry payments made publicly available according to the Sunshine Act for the year 2018 were also compared, and female vascular surgeons received an average of $2155.28 compared with their male counterparts, who received almost four times as much at $8452.43 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although there is certainly improved representation of women in vascular surgery compared with several decades ago, a discrepancy still persists. Women tend to have more grants than men and receive less in industry payments, but they hold fewer leadership positions, do not publish as frequently, and are cited less than their male counterparts. Further investigation should be aimed at identifying the causes of gender disparity and systemic barriers to gender equity in academic vascular surgery.
Asunto(s)
Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Sexismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Bibliometría , Movilidad Laboral , Docentes Médicos/economía , Docentes Médicos/tendencias , Femenino , Organización de la Financiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Organización de la Financiación/tendencias , Humanos , Liderazgo , Masculino , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economía , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/estadística & datos numéricos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/tendencias , Ejecutivos Médicos/economía , Ejecutivos Médicos/tendencias , Médicos Mujeres/economía , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Sexismo/prevención & control , Sexismo/tendencias , Sociedades Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/economía , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/educación , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/tendencias , Cirujanos/economía , Cirujanos/tendencias , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether gender inequities exist for pediatric physiatrists and, if affirmative, what factors account for this difference. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Online REDCap survey administered via e-mail. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric physiatrists practicing in the United States in 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents reported on their gender, training, practice type and location, leadership positions, years in practice and years at their current location, salary, research, and clinical productivity. RESULTS: Of the 307 surveys sent, 235 individuals responded, yielding a response rate of 76.5%. Pediatric physiatrists who identified as women were more likely to work part-time but were demographically similar to their colleagues who identified as men. The odds of having no leadership role were higher for women (odds ratio=2.17; P=.02) than men. Pediatric physiatrists who identified as men made on average (in US dollars ± SD) 244,798±52,906 annually compared with those who identified as women 224,497±60,756. The average annual difference in full-time salary was $20,311 in favor of those who identified as men (95% confidence interval, $3135-$37,486). The set of predictors in the multivariable model explained about 40% of the total variability in annual full-time salary (R2=0.389; adjusted R2=0.339; F15,197=7.734; P<.001). Gender was not a significant predictor in the model, but model prediction of the salaries of pediatric physiatrists who identified as men was better than model prediction of the salaries of those who identified as women. CONCLUSIONS: Despite representing a majority of the field, pediatric physiatrists who identified as women were paid less than their counterparts who identified as men. The traditional predictors associated with the salaries of men were not enough to explain salary variation among those who identified as women, thereby providing evidence of the importance of intangible and unmeasured aspects of a women's career, such as bias and institutional culture.
Asunto(s)
Fisiatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/economía , Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pediatría , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore how prepared psychiatry programs are to teach residents to practice resource management and high-value, cost-effective care. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was sent to 187 psychiatry training directors between July and September 2015. RESULTS: Forty-four percent of training directors responded to the survey. While most training directors who responded (88%) agreed that that graduate medical education has a responsibility to respond to the rising cost of health care, fewer than half agreed that that their faculty members consistently model cost-effective care (48%), that residents have access to information regarding the cost of tests and procedures (32%), and that residents are prepared to integrate the cost of care with available evidence when making medical decisions (44%). Only 11% reported providing training in resource management. Barriers cited to teaching cost-effective care included a lack of information regarding health care costs (45%), a lack of time (24%), a lack of faculty with relevant skills (19%), and competing training demands and priorities (18%). Training directors also noted a lack of available curricular resources and assessment tools (21%). Another 12% cited concerns about cost containment overriding treatment guidelines. Ninety percent of training directors agreed that they would be interested in resources to help teach high-value, cost-effective care. CONCLUSIONS: Most psychiatry programs do not provide formal training in resource management but are interested in resources to teach high-value, cost-effective care. Curricula for residents and faculty may help meet this need.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Internado y Residencia , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Psiquiatría/educación , Curriculum/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Not available.
Asunto(s)
Equidad de Género , Reumatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Movilidad Laboral , Toma de Decisiones , Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Docentes Médicos/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Liderazgo , Masculino , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/economía , Reumatología/tendencias , Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Razón de MasculinidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The necessity of a nonclinical education for surgery residents is a topic of exploration. We examine chief resident (CR) and program director (PD) perspectives on the need for a standardized nonclinical curriculum. METHODS: PDs and CRs from accredited general surgery programs were solicited to partake in an anonymous survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There were 42 PD and 68 CR responses. Half or more CRs lack confidence to independently determine their own worth, find a job, negotiate a contract, select disability insurance, and formulate retirement plans. PDs recognize that education in several nonclinical topics is essential for surgical residents. CRs and PDs agree on the necessity for formal education on all topics except "Burnout" (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CRs lack the confidence to navigate several nonclinical topics. PDs recognize that education in these topics is necessary. PDs and CRs agree on the need for a nonclinical education except for "Burnout", indicating a positive change in education over time, as most CRs feel they are educated adequately on this topic. Validation of a uniform curriculum is needed.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Masculino , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chair of the Department of Surgery, sometimes known as the Chief, holds a title that has significant historical connotations. Our goal was to assess a group of objectively measurable characteristics that unify these individuals as a group. METHODS: Utilizing publicly available data for all US teaching hospitals, demographic information was accumulated for the named chiefs/chairs of surgery. Information collected included location of their program, their medical/surgical training history, their surgical specialty, previous chair/chief titles held, and academic productivity. RESULTS: Of the 259 programs listed, data were available on 244 individuals who were trained in 19 different specialties. The top three specialties of these practitioners are General Surgery (40, 16.3%), Surgical Oncology (38, 15.5%), and Vascular Surgery (33, 13.5%). There were only 14 female chairs (5.7%) and only one chair with a doctor of osteopathic medicine degree. The majority (62.3%) had been a previous chief of a surgical subdivision with only 26% having been a previous chair/chief of the surgical department. The average chair had 72 peer-reviewed manuscripts with 28 published book chapters. Chair's at academic institutions with university affiliation had a significantly higher number of peer-reviewed manuscripts (P < 0.0001) as well as were more likely to be trained at academic institutions (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: There are no set characteristics that define the Chair of a Department of Surgery. By understanding a group of baseline characteristics that unify these surgical leaders, young faculty and trainees with leadership aspirations may begin to understand what is necessary to fill these roles in the future.
Asunto(s)
Docentes Médicos/psicología , Hospitales de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Liderazgo , Ejecutivos Médicos/psicología , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/organización & administración , Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Edición/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Gender disparities in leadership are receiving increased attention throughout medicine and medical subspecialties. Little is known about the disparities in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. In this piece, we explore gender disparities in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine physician leadership. We examine physician leadership in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education fellowship programs, as well as a limited sample of major Pediatric Critical Care Medicine textbooks and societies. Overall, the gender composition of division directors is not significantly different from that of workforce composition, although regional differences exist. More women than men lead fellowship programs, at a higher ratio compared with workforce composition. However, greater gender disparities are present in editorial leadership in this limited analysis. We conclude by recommending potential paths forward for further study and intervention, such as tracking gender diversity and being cognizant of the unique challenges that women currently experience in professional advancement.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Liderazgo , Pediatría/organización & administración , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Movilidad Laboral , Becas/organización & administración , Femenino , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pediatría/educación , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Sexo , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Sociedades Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Libros de Texto como AsuntoAsunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Ortopedia , Médicos Mujeres , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Ortopedia/educación , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Sexismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/educación , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos , Equidad de GéneroRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Training in child and adolescent psychotherapy continues to be emphasized by accrediting organizations (ACGME and ABPN) but it is not known how these skills are taught and what types of therapy are highlighted in fellowships across the United States. METHODS: A 16-question anonymous online survey was developed by the authors and covered six main areas: demographics, the priority of psychotherapy in training, the competency goals for different psychotherapy modalities, training strategies, types of supervision, and program directors' satisfaction of their training implementation and assessment of trainees. The survey was sent to every identified CAP program director during a three-month period in early 2017. RESULTS: Data was gathered from 53 of the 131 program directors surveyed, giving a 40% response rate. Ninety percent of CAP program directors strongly agree or agree that it is important to preserve and promote training and practice of psychotherapy. Most (83%) program directors indicated competence or expertise as a training goal for CBT with more variability among programs for other psychotherapies. Seventy percent of program directors agree that their program provides adequate time for learning and practicing psychotherapy but the allotted time for psychotherapy is low across majority of programs over both years of training. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that there is a gap between the goals of providing optimal training in psychotherapy with the low amount of protected time for the practice of psychotherapy. These results should provide a foundation for program directors to learn from each other about developing, improving, and implementing effective psychotherapy training.
Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría del Adolescente/educación , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum/tendencias , Becas , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicoterapia/educación , Adolescente , Niño , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the prevalence of moonlighting among psychiatry residents; the perceived effects of moonlighting on resident recruitment, education, and liability; and policies and practices governing oversight. METHODS: In 2013, surveys were emailed to all general psychiatry residency programs that were accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and had available contact information (n = 183). Resident surveys were emailed to program coordinators with a request to forward the survey link to their residents. RESULTS: Responses were received from 63 program directors (34% response rate) and 238 residents (about 5% of total general psychiatry residents). Most psychiatry program directors (95%) indicated that their programs permit moonlighting. Moonlighting participation increased with each year of training, culminating with 67% of fourth year residents. Most residents and faculty (87%) agreed that moonlighting enhanced resident education. Thirty-seven percent of program directors reported having no oversight procedures in place to monitor moonlighting activities. Thirty-nine percent of resident survey responders reported having no supervision for at least one of their moonlighting activities and only 9% reported always having access to on-site supervision. CONCLUSION: Though limited by a low response rate, this study found that moonlighting seems to remain prevalent among psychiatry residents and widely accepted by psychiatry residency training programs. There appears to be relatively limited program oversight for moonlighting activities, many of which seem to lack close supervision.
Asunto(s)
Empleo/economía , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Psiquiatría/educación , Carga de Trabajo/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/economía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Tolerancia al Trabajo ProgramadoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study determines the extent to which residents and their program directors have discordant perceptions regarding wellness, support, and treatment opportunities for trainees. In addition, the authors examined whether psychiatry residents differed in their perceptions compared with residents in other specialties. METHODS: Residents and their program directors from each of 10 specialties were electronically surveyed after IRB approval and giving informed consent. RESULTS: Of 42 program directors responding, over 92% indicated they provided wellness education and programming; however, a significantly lower percentage of 822 trainees were aware of this (81.2% and 74.9%, respectively). A similar disparity existed between program directors (PDs) who knew where to refer depressed residents for help (92.9%) and residents who knew where to seek help (71%). Moreover, 83.3% of program directors believed they could comfortably discuss depression with a depressed resident, but a lower percentage of their trainees (69.1%) felt their training directors would be supportive. A significantly greater percentage of program directors (40.5%) believed seeking treatment for depression might compromise medical licensure than did residents (13.0%). Psychiatry residents were significantly more aware of wellness, support, and access than were residents from other specialties. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of wellness education, programming, program director accessibility, and knowing where to ask for help if depressed does not seem to be adequately communicated to many residents. Moreover, program directors disproportionately see depression treatment as a risk to medical licensure compared with their residents. Psychiatry residents seem to be more aware of program director support and access to care than their colleagues.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/terapia , Promoción de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Psiquiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Depresión/psicología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina , Ohio , Percepción , Psiquiatría/educaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Opioid misuse is a public health crisis that stems in part from overprescribing by health-care providers. Surgical residents are commonly responsible for prescribing opioids at patient discharge, and residency program directors (PDs) are charged with their residents' education. Because each hospital and state has different opioid prescribing policies, we sought to assess PDs' knowledge about local controlled substance prescribing polices. METHODS: A survey was emailed to surgery PDs that included questions regarding residency characteristics and knowledge of state regulations. RESULTS: A total of 247 PDs were emailed with 110 (44.5%) completed responses. One hundred and four (94.5%) allow residents to prescribe outpatient opioids; one was unsure. Sixty-three (57.3%) respondents correctly answered if their state required opioid prescribing education for full licensure. Twenty-two (20.0%) were unsure if their state required opioid prescribing education for licensure. Sixty-four (58.2%) respondents answered correctly if a prescription monitor programs use is required in their state. Twenty-nine (26.4%) were unsure if a state prescription monitor programs existed. Seventy-six (69.1%) PDs answered correctly about their state's requirement for an additional registration to prescribe controlled substances; 10 (9.1%) did not know if this was required. Twenty-nine (27.9%) programs require residents to obtain individual drug enforcement agency registration; 5 (4.8%) were unsure if this was required. CONCLUSIONS: Most programs allow residents to prescribe outpatient opioids. However, this survey demonstrated a considerable gap in PDs' knowledge about controlled substance regulations. Because they oversee surgical residents' education, PDs should be versed about their local policies in this matter.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mal Uso de Medicamentos de Venta con Receta/prevención & control , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Sustancias Controladas/efectos adversos , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Monitoreo de Medicamentos Recetados , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The current state of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) training for Canadian cardiac surgical residents is unknown. Our goals were to establish a national inventory of TAVI educational resources, elucidate the role of residents in TAVI programs, and determine the attitudes and perspectives of residents and program directors regarding the importance of TAVI technology and training. METHODS: We sent Web-based surveys and reminders to all Canadian cardiac surgical residents and program directors between February and July 2017. We used descriptive analyses to summarize data in an aggregate and anonymous manner. We analyzed patterned responses to open-ended survey questions using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of 92 residents (85%) and 11 of 12 program directors (92%) completed the survey, with broad representation from across Canada. A minority of residents (14 [18%]) and program directors (4 [36%]) reported that TAVI training in their program was adequate. Only 3 program directors (27%) reported that their residents had access to TAVI simulation training. Although most residents (76 [97%]) and program directors (10 [91%]) agreed that TAVI was important to the trainee's future practice, about two-thirds (54 [69%] and 7 [64%], respectively) agreed that TAVI should be a focus of fellowship training. A perceived lack of interest from interventional cardiologists to teach surgical residents, competition from TAVI fellows and lack of formalized time during residency were identified as perceived barriers to TAVI training. CONCLUSION: As Canadian surgical residency training moves toward a Competence by Design curriculum, there remains a pressing need to create uniform learning objectives and expectations in the TAVI curriculum.
CONTEXTE: On ne connaît pas l'état actuel de la formation en implantation transcathéter de valvule aortique (ITVA) que reçoivent les médecins résidents dans les programmes canadiens de chirurgie cardiaque. Nous voulions dresser un inventaire national des ressources pédagogiques en ITVA, expliquer le rôle des médecins résidents dans les programmes d'ITVA et déterminer les attitudes et les points de vue des résidents et des directeurs de programme quant à l'importance de la technologie d'ITVA et de la formation en la matière. MÉTHODES: Entre février et juillet 2017, nous avons envoyé des sondages web et des rappels à tous les médecins résidents en chirurgie cardiaque et aux directeurs de ces programmes au Canada. Nous avons utilisé des analyses descriptives pour résumer les données de façon agrégée et anonyme. Nous avons analysé les réponses à des questions ouvertes et dégagé des tendances au moyen d'une analyse thématique. RÉSULTATS: Soixante-dix-huit des 92 résidents (85â¯%) et 11 des 12 directeurs de programme (92â¯%) ont répondu au sondage, avec une vaste représentation de partout au Canada. Une minorité de résidents (14 [18â¯%]) et de directeurs de programme (4 [36â¯%]) ont déclaré que la formation en ITVA offerte par leur programme était adéquate. Seuls 3 directeurs de programme (27â¯%) ont déclaré que leurs résidents avaient accès à une formation en simulation de l'ITVA. Bien que la plupart des résidents (76 [97â¯%]) et des directeurs de programme (10 [91â¯%]) soient d'accord pour dire que l'ITVA est importante pour la pratique future du stagiaire, environ les deux tiers (54 [69â¯%] et 7 [64â¯%], respectivement) sont d'avis que la formation à l'ITVA devrait faire l'objet d'un stage particulier. Un manque perçu d'intérêt de la part des cardiologues interventionnels pour l'enseignement aux médecins résidents en chirurgie, la compétition entre les stagiaires pour la formation à l'ITVA et le manque de temps officiellement réservé à ce volet pendant la résidence ont été identifiés comme des obstacles perçus à la formation en ITVA. CONCLUSION: À mesure que les programmes de résidence en chirurgie au Canada s'orientent vers une formation axée sur les compétences par conception, il demeure urgent de formuler des objectifs et des attentes d'apprentissage uniformes pour la formation en ITVA.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Curriculum/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/educación , Canadá , Humanos , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The introduction of requirements for a minimum intake capacity of trauma patients by the German Trauma Society (DGU) into the so-called white book of treatment of seriously injured patients, is helpful for a sufficient preparation for threats and for dealing with mass casualties for trauma centers as well as for the emergency medical services (EMS). In the hospital information database provided by the Federation of German Medical Directors of Emergency Medical Services, more than 1300 hospitals are currently listed. This information supports the allocation of trauma patients from the field to the appropriate trauma center. Currently, without any coordination requirements, the current 626 trauma centers in Germany are able to immediately handle 6260 patients. This number could be doubled by activating the local hospital action plan, where a priority plan is set up. Additionally, the implementation of a nationwide flexible standardized communication structure between the dispatch center of the ambulance service and the hospitals, would improve daily care as well as the management of threats and mass casualties. It is the obligation of the local medical director of the EMS, to maintain and update the hospital database. Providing the information in the database with the hospital resources and the flexible standard communication structure, is appropriate to improve the daily collaboration and the preparation for mass casualties.
Asunto(s)
Planificación en Desastres/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/provisión & distribución , Implementación de Plan de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/provisión & distribución , Sociedades Médicas , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Alemania , Implementación de Plan de Salud/organización & administración , Recursos en Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The recently increased minimum aesthetic surgery requirements set by the Plastic Surgery Residency Review Committee of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education highlight the importance of aesthetic surgery training for plastic surgery residents. Participation in resident aesthetic surgery clinics has become an important tool to achieve this goal. Yet, there is little literature on the current structure of these clinics. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate current practices of aesthetic resident-run clinics in the United States. METHODS: A survey examining specific aspects of chief resident clinics was distributed to 70 plastic surgery resident program directors in the United States. Thirty-five questions sought to delineate clinic structure, procedures and services offered, financial cost to the patient, and satisfaction and educational benefit derived from the experience. RESULTS: Fifty-two questionnaires were returned, representing 74.2% of programs surveyed. Thirty-two (63%) reported having a dedicated resident aesthetic surgery clinic at their institution. The most common procedures performed were abdominoplasty (n = 20), breast augmentation (n = 19), and liposuction (n = 16). Most clinics offered neuromodulators (n = 29) and injectable fillers (n = 29). The most common billing method used was a 50% discount on surgeon fee, with the patient being responsible for the entirety of hospital and anesthesia fees. Twenty-six respondents reported feeling satisfied or very satisfied with their resident aesthetic clinic. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found aesthetic chief resident clinics to differ greatly in their structure. Yet the variety of procedures and services offered makes participation in these clinics an effective training method for the development of both aesthetic surgical technique and resident autonomy.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/educación , Clínica Administrada por Estudiantes/organización & administración , Cirugía Plástica/educación , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/economía , Clínica Administrada por Estudiantes/economía , Clínica Administrada por Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We assess Massachusetts emergency department (ED) involvement and internal ED constructs within accountable care organization contracts. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to 70 Massachusetts ED directors. Questions attempted to assess involvement of EDs in accountable care organizations and the structures in place in EDs-from departmental resources to physician incentives-to help achieve accountable care organization goals of decreasing spending and improving quality. RESULTS: Of responding ED directors, 79% reported alignment between the ED and an accountable care organization. Almost all ED groups (88%) reported bearing no financial risk as a result of the accountable care organization contracts in which their organizations participated. Major obstacles to meeting accountable care organization objectives included care coordination challenges (62%) and lack of familiarity with accountable care organization goals (58%). The most common cost-reduction strategies included ED case management (85%) and information technology (61%). Limitations of this study include that information was self-reported by ED directors, a focus limited to Massachusetts, and a survey response rate of 47%. CONCLUSION: The ED directors perceived that the majority of physicians were not familiar with accountable care organization goals, many challenges remain in coordinating care for patients in the ED, and most EDs have no financial incentives tied to accountable care organizations. EDs in Massachusetts have begun to implement strategies aimed at reducing admissions, utilization, and overall cost, but these strategies are not widespread apart from case management, even in a state with heavy accountable care organization penetration. Our results suggest that Massachusetts EDs still lack clear directives and direct involvement in meeting accountable care organization goals.
Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo de Caso/economía , Manejo de Caso/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Humanos , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Informática Médica/economía , Informática Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejecutivos Médicos/organización & administración , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Incentivos para los Médicos/organización & administración , Médicos/organización & administración , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Autoinforme , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to (1) establish current sedation practice in UK critical care to inform evidence synthesis and potential future primary research and (2) to compare practice reported via a survey with actual practice assessed in a point prevalence study (PPS). METHODS: UK adult general critical care units were invited to participate in a survey of current sedation practice, and a representative sample of units was invited to participate in a PPS of sedation practice at the patient level. Survey responses were compared with PPS data where both were available. RESULTS: Survey responses were received from 214 (91 %) of 235 eligible critical care units. Of these respondents, 57 % reported having a written sedation protocol, 94 % having a policy of daily sedation holds and 94 % using a sedation scale to assess depth of sedation. In the PPS, across units reporting a policy of daily sedation holds, a median of 50 % (IQR 33-75 %) of sedated patients were considered for a sedation hold. A median of 88 % (IQR 63-100 %) of patients were assessed using the same sedation scale as reported in the survey. Both the survey and the PPS indicated propofol as the preferred sedative and alfentanil, fentanyl and morphine as the preferred analgesics. In most of the PPS units, all patients had received the unit's reported first-choice sedative (median across units 100 %, IQR 64-100 %), and a median of 80 % (IQR 67-100 %) of patients had received the unit's reported first-choice analgesic. Most units (83 %) reported in the survey that sedatives are usually administered in combination with analgesics. Across units that participated in the PPS, 69 % of patients had received a combination of agents - most frequently propofol combined with either alfentanil or fentanyl. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice reported in the national survey did not accurately reflect actual clinical practice at the patient level observed in the PPS. Employing a mixed methods approach provided a more complete picture of sedation practice in terms of breadth and depth of information.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejecutivos Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Prevalencia , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The physician manager role in the health care system is invaluable as they serve as role models and quality setters. The requirements from physician managers have become more demanding and the role less prestigious; yet burnout and its prevention in this group have received little attention. Physician leadership development programmes have generally dealt directly with skill and knowledge acquisition. The aim of this research was to evaluate an intensive workshop designed to modify attitudes and improve skills of physician-managers of community clinics, through focus on personal well-being and empowerment. METHODS: Two hundred fifty six physicians affiliated with Clalit Health Services, the largest health maintenance organization in Israel, participated in 16 IMPACT courses during the years 2013-2015. The programme comprised five full days during a two-week period, including an overnight and follow-up meetings three and six weeks later. Theoretical knowledge, experiential learning, practical tools, deep personal exercises, and simulations were conveyed through individual and group work. Topics included: models of self-awareness, outcome thinking, determining a personal and organizational vision, and creating a personal approach to leadership. At the end of each course, and by email at 6 or more months after completion of the course, participants were asked to anonymously respond to closed questions (on a scale of 1-6) and an open question. RESULTS: Mean scores for the contribution of IMPACT to participants' role of physician manager were 5.3 at the end of the course, and 4.7 at 6 or more months later. Mean scores at 6 or more months were 5.0 regarding the contribution of the programme to personal development, 4.4 regarding satisfaction in the role of physician manager, and 4.6 regarding their coping with managerial dilemmas. CONCLUSION: A workshop that focused on personal growth and self-awareness increased physicians' job satisfaction and their sense of managerial capability, coping with managerial dilemmas, and belonging to the organization.