The long-term outcomes of mepolizumab treatment at 100 mg dose on idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: A real-life experience.

Background: The standard therapeutic regimen for idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) involves the administration of oral corticosteroids (OCS). However, a notable proportion of individuals experience recurrent episodes after the tapering or cessation of OCS during the course of ICEP. There has been a growing interest in exploring alternative treatment modalities for patients with ICEP at heightened risk of relapse. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of mepolizumab at a dose of 100 mg administered every 4 weeks in preventing relapses of ICEP and its impact on the clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective clinical observational study used real-world data to assess the impact of mepolizumab on patients diagnosed with ICEP accompanied by severe asthma. Demographic information and clinical characteristics were extracted from medical records. The study examined the effect of mepolizumab on the annual relapse rate, OCS dose, eosinophil count, and respiratory function parameters. Results: All patients included in the study, with a median (range) follow-up period of 19 months (4-40 months), the annual relapse rate decreased from 0.33 to 0 after the initiation mepolizumab. In addition, the maintenance OCS dose, expressed in methylprednisolone equivalents, declined from 4 mg/day to 0 mg/day. A reduction in the blood eosinophil count was observed, alongside a partial improvement in respiratory function test results among the patients. Conclusion: A dose regimen of 100 mg of mepolizumab administered every 4 weeks emerges as a promising and well-tolerated therapeutic approach for averting relapses of ICEP.

Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia.

ABSTRACT: Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DIEP) is a rare complication of daptomycin use. Manifestations most commonly include fever, hypoxia, dyspnea, cough, eosinophilia, and lung changes on radiographs and CT. Patients typically have had recent daptomycin exposure and develop fever, dyspnea, infiltrates on chest radiograph, more than 25% eosinophils on bronchoalveolar lavage, and improvement of symptoms after withdrawal of daptomycin. Treatment includes discontinuation of daptomycin, corticosteroids, and supportive measures such as supplemental oxygen. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for DIEP in patients who develop new onset of pulmonary and systemic signs and symptoms after initiation of daptomycin.

Long-term effectiveness of benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma patients treated for 96-weeks: data from the ANANKE study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of benralizumab has been broadly demonstrated in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA), but only few real-life studies evaluated its long-term effects. Here we present novel data from the ANANKE study in which a large cohort of SEA patients was treated for up to 96 weeks. METHODS: ANANKE (NCT04272463) is an observational retrospective Italian study investigating the key characteristics of SEA patients (collected during the 12 months prior to benralizumab initiation) and the clinical outcomes during benralizumab treatment (annual exacerbation rate [AER], lung function, asthma control, OCS use, healthcare resource utilization). A post hoc analysis was also conducted in groups of patients based on history of previous biologic therapy (bio-experienced versus naïve patients). Analyses were descriptive only. RESULTS: Before benralizumab initiation, evaluable SEA patients (N = 162, 61.1% females, mean age 56.0 ± 12.7) showed a median blood eosinophil count (BEC) of 600 cells/mm3 (IQR: 430-890). Patients experienced frequent exacerbations (annualized exacerbation rate [AER]: 4.10, severe AER: 0.98), with impaired lung function and poor asthma control (median ACT score: 14) despite 25.3% reported oral corticosteroid (OCS) use. Nasal polyposis was present in 53.1% patients; 47.5% patients were atopic. After 96 weeks since the start of benralizumab, nearly 90% patients were still on treatment; benralizumab dramatically decreased exacerbations (AER: - 94.9%; severe AER: - 96.9%), improved respiratory parameters (median increase in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume [pre-BD FEV1]: + 400 mL) and asthma control (median ACT score: 23) while eliminating OCS in 60% patients. Importantly, benralizumab effects were either maintained or progressively improved over time, accompanied by a nearly complete depletion of BEC. Benralizumab reduced AER both in naïve (any AER: - 95.9%; severe AER: - 97.5%) and bio-experienced patients (any AER: - 92.4%; severe AER: - 94.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Profound and sustained improvements in all asthma outcomes were observed with benralizumab. The correct identification of patients' eosinophilic-driven asthma phenotype was essential to ensure the achievement of such remarkable results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04272463.

Achieving clinical outcomes with benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma patients in a real-world setting: orbe II study.

BACKGROUND: The ORBE II study aimed to describe the characteristics and clinical outcomes of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) treated with benralizumab in a real-world setting in Spain. METHODS: ORBE II (NCT04648839) was an observational, retrospective cohort study in adult SEA patients who had been prescribed benralizumab. Demographic and clinical data of 204 SEA patients were collected 12 months prior to benralizumab initiation (baseline) and at follow-up. Exacerbation rate, asthma symptoms, maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and lung function were evaluated, among other variables. RESULTS: A total of 204 SEA patients were evaluated. Mean (standard deviation, SD) age of the study population was 56.4 (12.4) years, 62.3% were women and mean (SD) duration of asthma was 15.1 (12.7) years. Median (Q1-Q3) follow-up duration was 19.5 (14.2-24.2) months. At baseline, 72.6% of the overall population (OP) presented blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/µL; 36.8% had comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP); 84.8% reported at least one severe exacerbation, and 29.1% were OCS-dependent. At 1 year of follow-up, patients receiving benralizumab treatment had a 85.6% mean reduction in exacerbations from baseline, and 81.4% of patients achieved zero exacerbations. We also found a clinically relevant mean (SD) increase in pre-bronchodilator (BD) FEV1 of 331 (413) mL, with 66.7% of patients achieving a pre-BD FEV1 increase ≥ 100 mL, and 46.3% of patients achieving a pre-BD FEV1 ≥ 80% of predicted. Regarding symptom control, 73.8% of the OP obtained an ACT score ≥ 20 points. After 1 year of follow-up, mean reduction in the daily OCS dose was 70.5%, and complete OCS withdrawal was achieved by 52.8% of the OCS-dependent patients. Almost half (43.7%) of the OP on benralizumab met all four criteria for clinical remission. Patients with concomitant CRSwNP obtained similar or enhanced outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the real-world benefits of benralizumab in SEA patients, and particularly in those with concomitant CRSwNP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04648839.

Evaluation of the Clinical Features and Laboratory Data of Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Classified as Super-Responders, Partial Responders, or Nonresponders to Mepolizumab Treatment: A Real-Life Study.

INTRODUCTION: Mepolizumab is a treatment option in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, which inhibits interleukin-5. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features and laboratory data of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who were classified as super-responders, partial responders, or nonresponders to mepolizumab treatment. METHODS: In this retrospective real-life study, the clinical features and laboratory data were compared between groups of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who were classified as super-responders, partial responders, or nonresponders to mepolizumab treatment. RESULTS: Evaluation was made of a total of 55 patients, comprising 17 (30.9%) males and 38 (69.1%) females with a mean age of 51.28 ± 14.32 years. All the patients were receiving mepolizumab treatment for severe eosinophilic asthma, with 17 (30.9%) patients evaluated as super-responders, 26 (47.3%) as partial responders, and 12 (21.8%) as nonresponders. After mepolizumab treatment, there was a statistically significant decrease in asthma exacerbations, the number of oral corticosteroids (OCSs) used, the rate of hospitalization due to asthma attacks, and the eosinophil count (cells/µL) (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and <0.001, respectively). A statistically significant increase was determined in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) value (p = 0.010) and asthma control test (ACT) score (p < 0.001) after mepolizumab treatment. The baseline eosinophil count, eosinophil/lymphocyte ratio and FEV1 (%) values were significantly higher in the super-responder and partial responder groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, and p = 0.002, respectively). The baseline ACT score and the rate of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps were significantly higher in the partial responder group (p = 0.004, p = 0.015, respectively). The rate of regular OCS use before mepolizumab treatment was significantly higher in the nonresponder group (p = 0.049). As a result of the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, the blood eosinophil count (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.967, p < 0.001), eosinophil/lymphocyte ratio (AUC: 0.921, p < 0.001), and FEV1 (%) (AUC: 0.828, p = 0.002) were found to have diagnostic value in predicting the response to mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. CONCLUSION: Baseline eosinophil count, eosinophil/lymphocyte ratio, and FEV1 (%) were found to be important predictors of response to mepolizumab treatment. Further studies are needed to define the characterization of mepolizumab responders in the real world.

Use of FeNO to predict anti-IL-5 and IL-5R biologics efficacy in a real-world cohort of adults with severe eosinophilic asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is associated with multiple exacerbations. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a biomarker of airway T2 inflammation, is known to be correlated with the risk of exacerbations. While the use of FeNO is well established to predict the therapeutic response to dupilumab (anti-IL-4/IL-13), it remains uncertain for biologics targeting the IL-5 pathway. METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, monocentric analysis of adults with SEA who started mepolizumab (anti-IL-5) or benralizumab (anti-IL-5R) between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. RESULTS: Data were collected for 109 patients. All participants reported uncontrolled asthma with a median of 3 annual exacerbations and a median Asthma Control Test score of 12. They all had an initial blood eosinophilia >300/mm3, with a median at 610/mm3 (IQR 420-856). Patients with a baseline FeNO ≥50 ppb reported more exacerbations in the previous year than those with a FeNO <50 ppb (p = 0.02). After initiation of treatment, change in FeNO was not associated with therapeutic response. However, decrease in the annual number of exacerbations was significantly greater in patients with a baseline FeNO ≥50 ppb than in those with a baseline FeNO <50 ppb (-3.3 ± 2.7 vs -0.9 ± 2.4, respectively; p = 0.01). There was no association between baseline FeNO values and subsequent lung function, asthma control or reduction of oral corticosteroids use. CONCLUSION: In this real-world cohort, adults with SEA who had a baseline FeNO ≥50 ppb experienced a greater decrease in exacerbations after 12 months of anti-IL-5 or IL-5R biologics than those with a FeNO <50 ppb.

Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia Masquerading as a Lung Abscess.

BACKGROUND: Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia (AEP) is a rare form of non-infectious pneumonia that is easily missed and misdiagnosed because of its atypical clinical symptoms and misleading laboratory and imaging studies. METHODS: By reporting a case of an initial diagnosis of lung abscess, which was treated with antibiotics and then CT suggesting that the lesion continued to worsen, it was eventually confirmed to be AEP by lung biopsy, A joint literature analysis was conducted to improve clinicians' understanding of the diagnosis and treatment of AEP. RESULTS: Initially, because of the atypical ancillary findings, we thought the disease was a lung abscess, which was eventually confirmed by pathology as AEP. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of AEP needs to be considered when various laboratory findings point to infectious dis-ease, but anti-infection is not effective. Diagnosis can be confirmed by bronchoalveolar lavage and lung tissue biopsy. Prompt treatment can provide rapid relief and reduce the risk of patient death.

Respiratory virus infections of the lower respiratory tract elevate bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophil fraction: a clinical retrospective study and case review.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airway inflammation caused by respiratory virus infection has been demonstrated in basic research; however, clinical investigations are lacking. To clarify the extent to which respiratory virus infection induces airway eosinophilic inflammation, we reviewed the results of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and respiratory virus testing performed at our hospital. METHODS: Among the BAL procedures performed at the University of the Ryukyu Hospital from August 2012 to September 2016, we collected cases of acute respiratory disease in which multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to search for respiratory viruses. The effect of respiratory virus detection on BAL eosinophil fraction was analyzed using statistical analysis. A case study was conducted on respiratory virus detection, which showed an elevated BAL eosinophil fraction. RESULTS: A total of 95 cases were included in this study, of which 17 were PCR-positive. The most common respiratory virus detected was parainfluenza virus (eight cases). The PCR-positive group showed a higher BAL eosinophil fraction than the PCR-negative group (p = 0.030), and more cases had a BAL eosinophil fraction > 3% (p = 0.017). Multivariate analysis revealed that being PCR-positive was significantly associated with BAL eosinophil fraction > 1% and > 3%. There were nine PCR-positive cases with a BAL eosinophil fraction > 1%, of which two cases with parainfluenza virus infection had a marked elevation of BAL eosinophil fraction and were diagnosed with eosinophilic pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Cases of viral infection of the lower respiratory tract showed an elevated BAL eosinophil fraction. The increase in eosinophil fraction due to respiratory virus infection was generally mild, whereas some cases showed marked elevation and were diagnosed with eosinophilic pneumonia. Respiratory virus infection is not a rare cause of elevated BAL eosinophil fraction and should be listed as a differential disease in the practice of eosinophilic pneumonia.

A rare case of acute eosinophilic pneumonia induced by vaping-associated lung injury: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is well-known as one of the primary eosinophilic pulmonary diseases of unknown etiology. It's defined as a febrile illness along with acute onset respiratory failure that is commonly misdiagnosed at the initial presentation as infectious pneumonia. Despite the fact that AEP sometimes classified as idiopathic as no exact cause can be identified in most cases, it has been suggested recently to be linked with electronic cigarette or vaping products and associated with electronic cigarette or vaping associated lung injury (EVALI). Therefore, history of recent tobacco smoking or vaping exposure along with peripheral eosinophilia are crucial clinical findings suggestive of AEP. CASE PRESENTATION: A previously healthy 17-year-old female presented to the Emergency Room with one day history of progressively worsening shortness of breath accompanied by left sided pleuritic chest pain and fever. She wasn't taking any medications, denied traditional cigarette smoking, exposure to pulmonary irritants, recent travel and had no history of close contact with sick patient. She recently started vaping 20 days prior to the presentation. Initially, she was admitted with a presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia but was found to have AEP due to a recent vaping exposure. CONCLUSION: Vaping is a well-known health hazard that has become a growing trend among adolescents and have been promoted as a safe and effective alternative to traditional cigarettes. The etiology of AEP remains unclear, but many studies suggest a possible link with recent tobacco smoking or vaping. A key challenge for this clinical entity is to reach the diagnosis after excluding all other pulmonary eosinophilia causes, and it has an excellent prognosis if diagnosed early and treated appropriately.

The role of flexible bronchoscopy in the diagnostic pathway of children with unexplained peripheral eosinophilia.

BACKGROUND: Many possible underlying causes can be seen in children with unexplained peripheral eosinophilia (UPE) with suspected pulmonary involvement. Here, we aimed to demonstrate the clinical characteristics and diagnoses of children evaluated for UPE who underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy. METHODS: Thirty-one children who underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy for UPE between 2006-2018 were included. Demographic characteristics, bronchoscopy findings and final diagnosis, and treatments were evaluated. RESULTS: The median age at the time of diagnosis was 5 (0.25-17.5) years. The final diagnoses of 26 patients were as follows: immunodeficiency (n = 6); hyper-IgE syndromes (n = 4), DOCK8 deficiency + HES (idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome; n = 1), and severe combined immunodeficiency (n = 1), HES (n = 3), idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP; n = 3), idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis (n = 1), B cell lymphoma (n = 1). In one child, an integrin α3 mutation + cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonia was detected. Congenital pneumonia was found in one patient, and parasitic infection in another. In two, eosinophilia was attributed to underlying asthma and atopy. In four, the underlying reasons could not be elucidated. Two children with HES and one with ICEP were lost to follow-up. There was no significant relationship between the peripheral eosinophil count at the time of diagnosis and the percentage of bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophils (BAL). Bronchoscopy contributed to the management of 14 (53.9%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bronchoscopy has potential diagnostic contribution in patients with UPE suspected of having pulmonary involvement. Numerous various underlying causes may be present in this patient group. There is no relation between peripheral eosinophil count and BAL eosinophil percentage.

Hypersensitivity reactions to COVID-19 vaccines: a case of Eosinophilic pneumonia following Sinovac/CoronaVac vaccination.

Summary: Hypersensitivity reactions has been reported with COVID-19 vaccines. Acute eosinophilic pneumonia has not been reported yet after Sinovac/CoronaVac vaccine. A 73-year-old woman presented with maculopapular rash, cough and dyspnea following Sinovac/CoronaVac injection. The complete blood count (CBC) indicated eosinophilia and further evaluation of the eosinophilia with CT and bronchoscopy confirmed a diagnosis of acute eosinophilic pneumonia. After methylprednisolone therapy, her rash resolved with marked improvement of the dyspnea. She is still on treatment and on the follow up period, we plan to continue steroid treatment at least 3 months.

Vaping Associated Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia: A Clinical and Radiologic Mimicker of COVID-19.

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is a rare cause of respiratory failure. It is primarily a disease of smokers, either a new smoker or an existing one with a recent increase in cigarette consumption. Other risk factors include toxic gas exposure, inhalational illicit drugs, and smoking marijuana. AEP has also been reported in patients with e-cigarette or vaping associated lung injury (EVALI). We present the case of a 20-year-old male who presented to the hospital with acute respiratory failure. The patient has been vaping heavily for the past three months and started smoking three days before presenting to the emergency department. He was hypertensive, tachycardic, tachypneic, and required high-flow nasal cannula to maintain SpO2 > 92%. His condition deteriorated in the first 24 hours following hospitalization requiring noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Bronchoalveolar lavage revealed an eosinophil count of 36%. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cytology revealed lipid-laden macrophages. He was diagnosed with AEP due to EVALI, and the patient was treated with high dose corticosteroid with subsequent improvement. Before the bronchoscopic evaluation, the clinical and radiologic findings were consistent with COVID-19, and the patient was tested twice for SARS-CoV-2 PCR. In the appropriate clinical setting, AEP should be considered in the differential diagnoses of community-acquired pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and COVID-19, especially in this pandemic era.

Tryptase and IL-33 in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid May Predict the Types of Eosinophilic Pneumonia and Disease Recurrence.

INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is characterized by a marked accumulation of eosinophils in the lungs and blood. Eosinophils and mast cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of EP via release of biomarkers such as tryptase and interleukin (IL)-33. However, the potential role of these biomarkers is not fully understood. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the differences among the levels of tryptase and IL-33 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from several types of EP. We evaluated the differences between the levels of these biomarkers in the recurrent and nonrecurrent cases. METHOD: We prospectively collected the clinical data of patients with EP, diagnosed between 2006 and 2015 in our institution. Bronchoscopy was performed before steroid treatment; BALF was collected. The clinical characteristics of EP patients and the levels of tryptase and IL-33 in BALF were evaluated. RESULTS: We enrolled 15 patients with chronic EP (CEP), 5 with acute EP (AEP), 10 with drug-induced EP, and 6 with angiitis-related EP. Tryptase levels in the CEP group were significantly higher than that in the drug-induced EP group (p = 0.048), while the AEP group had the highest IL-33 levels. Recurrence of EP was noted in 67% of patients with CEP. The levels of tryptase and IL-33 were notably higher in the recurrent cases than that in the nonrecurrent CEP group (p = 0.004, p = 0.04, respectively). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between the levels of tryptase and IL-33 in the BALF of patients with CEP (ρ = 0.69, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Tryptase and IL-33 in BALF are useful biomarkers for the assessment of EP types. These biomarkers could be used to predict disease recurrence.

Allergic and eosinophilic asthma in the era of biomarkers and biologics: similarities, differences and misconceptions.

OBJECTIVE: Severe asthma is associated with substantial personal and economic burden; maintaining disease control is the key management goal. Increased understanding of asthma heterogeneity and development of type 2 (T2)-targeting biologics has substantially advanced disease management and outcomes; however, despite both being driven by T2 inflammation, allergic and eosinophilic asthma have different treatment recommendations. We sought to better understand the similarities and differences between allergic and eosinophilic asthma and highlight where misconceptions may arise. DATA SOURCES: Published articles, pivotal trials, post hoc analyses, and asthma clinical guidelines sourced from PubMed. STUDY SELECTIONS: Sources reporting allergic and eosinophilic asthma classifications, disease mechanisms, and biomarkers associated with treatment response. RESULTS: This review highlights that severe allergic and eosinophilic asthma are both driven by T2 inflammation with eosinophils playing a cardinal role. Despite this overlap, treatment recommendations differ based on asthma classification. T2 cytokine gene expression is a reasonably well-established research tool, but not a well-established biomarker in clinical practice, unlike blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and immunoglobulin E; the clinical relevance of immunoglobulin E as a predictive biomarker remains unclear. CONCLUSION: Asthma classifications that can be easily characterized at patient level to ensure accurate diagnosis, predict disease trajectory, and treatment response are required. The current dichotomy of allergic and eosinophilic asthma classifications is likely too simplistic, given the similar eosinophil-mediated disease pathophysiology in both classifications. Our results provide future directions to guide clinically meaningful interpretation of asthma endophenotypes, which may improve understanding of severe asthma characterization and aid future advances in defining responders more precisely with personalized medicine approaches.

New clinical diagnostic criteria for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis/mycosis and its validation.

BACKGROUND: There are several clinical diagnostic criteria for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). However, these criteria have not been validated in detail, and no criteria for allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis (ABPM) are currently available. OBJECTIVE: This study proposes new diagnostic criteria for ABPA/ABPM, consisting of 10 components, and compares its sensitivity and specificity to existing methods. METHODS: Rosenberg-Patterson criteria proposed in 1977, the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) criteria proposed in 2013, and this new criteria were applied to 79 cases with pathological ABPM and the control population with allergic mucin in the absence of fungal hyphae (n = 37), chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (n = 64), Aspergillus-sensitized severe asthma (n = 26), or chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (n = 24). These criteria were also applied to the 179 cases with physician-diagnosed ABPA/ABPM in a nationwide Japanese survey. RESULTS: The sensitivity for pathological ABPM with Rosenberg-Patterson criteria, ISHAM criteria, and this new criteria were 25.3%, 77.2%, and 96.2%, respectively. The sensitivity for physician-diagnosed ABPA/ABPM were 49.2%, 82.7%, and 94.4%, respectively. The areas under the curve for the receiver-operating characteristic curves were 0.85, 0.90, and 0.98, respectively. The sensitivity for ABPM cases that were culture-positive for non-Aspergillus fungi were 13.0%, 47.8%, and 91.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The new diagnostic criteria, compared with existing criteria, showed better sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing ABPA/ABPM.

Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia after Combined Use of Conventional and Heat-Not-Burn Cigarettes: A Case Report.

Background: Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is a rare acute respiratory disease accompanied by fever, shortness of breath, and cough. Although the pathogenesis of the disease is not yet established, the patient's condition improves with a rapid therapeutic response to systemic corticosteroids. Conventional cigarettes or heat-not-burn cigarettes are the most common cause of AEP among young people. Case Presentation: A 22-year-old woman with dyspnea, cough, and fever did not improve after visiting the local medical center and was admitted to the emergency room. The patient denied having any recent travel history or insect bites. She was treated with appropriate antibiotics according to the community acquired pneumonia, but there was no improvement. Chest radiography showed bilateral patches of pulmonary infiltration, and chest computed tomography revealed bilateral multifocal patchy consolidations with multiple small nodular ground-glass opacities and interlobular septal thickening. The bronchoalveolar lavage result was dominantly eosinophilic. The patient's condition improved rapidly after the use of intravenous methylprednisolone and then a change to oral methylprednisolone. Finally, the patient was hospitalized for 9 days, and the duration of use of methylprednisolone including outpatient visits was 14 days. Results: The early treatment of AEP yields a good prognosis, but since the symptoms of AEP are similar to those of infectious diseases such as community-acquired pneumonia, physicians should be meticulous in differentiating AEP from other diseases. Conclusions: Since AEP shows a good response to steroids, early detection using an appropriate diagnostic method is recommended. In addition, there should be strong education against smoking in any form.

[Clinical analysis of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia in 9 cases].

Objective: To investigate the clinical features, treatment and prognosis of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia. Methods: Nine patients with chronic eosinophilic pneumonia diagnosed in Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital from January 2014 to December 2020 were enrolled and followed up. The data of clinically proven chronic eosinophilic pneumonia were reviewed. Results: The 9 cases included one male and eight females, aged from 16 to 71 years (median 47 years). Among them, 5 cases were complicated with asthma, 1 case was complicated with allergic rhinitis, and 1 case had an allergic history of pollen. All the patients had cough, expectoration, chest tightness and wheezing, and a few had fatigue (3/9), fever (1/9) and chest pain (1/9). Single or multiple patchy high-density shadows (9/9), mediastinal lymphadenopathy (7/9), air bronchogram (2/9), and reticular shadow (1/9) were observed in chest CT. Peripheral eosinophils (EOS) and serum total IgE increased to varying degrees in the 9 patients. Meanwhile, the bronchoscopy of 5 cases showed elevated percentage of eosinophils in alveolar lavage fluid, and the lung biopsy of remaining 4 cases showed EOS infiltration in lung alveolar and interstitium. After receiving glucocorticoid therapy for 0.5 to 1 month, the clinical symptoms of all 9 patients had been improved and lung lesions on CT scans had been obviously absorbed. Four cases relapsed during follow-up. Conclusions: For patients especially women who have a history of allergy, elevated blood eosinophils and serum total IgE with pulmonary high-density shadow or consolidation, chronic eosinophilic pneumonia should be considered, and bronchoscopy or percutaneous lung biopsy is indicated for a definite diagnosis. Glucocorticoid therapy is effective, but the rate of recurrence is high.

Benefit of switching to mepolizumab from omalizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma based on patient characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The OSMO study assessed the efficacy of switching to mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma that was uncontrolled whilst receiving omalizumab. The objective of this analysis was to assess the proportion of patients achieving pre-defined improvements in up to four efficacy outcomes and the relationship between patient baseline characteristics and treatment response. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of OSMO study data (GSK ID:204471; ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT02654145). Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma uncontrolled by high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, other controller(s) and omalizumab subcutaneously (≥ 4 months) were switched to mepolizumab 100 mg administered subcutaneously. Endpoints included the proportion of responders-i.e. patients achieving a pre-defined clinical improvement in ≥ 1 of the following outcomes: (1) Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5 score (≥ 0.5-points), (2) St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (≥ 4-points), (3) pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1; ≥ 100 mL), all at Week 32, and (4) annualised rate of clinically significant exacerbations (≥ 50% reduction). RESULTS: Of the 145 patients included, 94%, 83%, 63% and 31% were responders for ≥ 1, ≥ 2, ≥ 3 and 4 outcomes, respectively; 75% and 78% were ACQ-5 and SGRQ score responders, and 50% and 69% were FEV1 and exacerbation responders. Subgroup analyses demonstrated improvements irrespective of baseline blood eosinophil count, prior omalizumab treatment regimen/duration, comorbidities, prior exacerbation history, maintenance oral corticosteroid use, ACQ-5 and SGRQ scores, and body weight/body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: After switching to mepolizumab, almost all patients with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma on omalizumab achieved a beneficial response in ≥ 1 clinical outcome. Improvements were observed regardless of baseline characteristics. Trial registration This manuscript is a post hoc analysis of data from the OSMO study. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02654145. Registered January 13, 2016.

Molecular markers of type 2 airway inflammation are similar between eosinophilic severe asthma and eosinophilic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Airway and systemic eosinophilia are important treatable traits in both severe asthma and COPD. The molecular basis of eosinophilia in COPD is poorly understood but could involve type 2 cytokines (IL5, IL13) and prostaglandin D2 (PGD2 ). METHODS: This study included non-obstructive airways disease (OAD) controls (n = 19), a COPD cohort (n = 96) and a severe asthma cohort (n = 84). Demographics, exacerbation history, disease impact (SGRQ) and spirometry were assessed. Participants were categorized as eosinophilic using either sputum eosinophil proportion (≥3%) or blood eosinophil count (≥300/µL). Sputum type 2 inflammatory measures included PGD2 by ELISA and gene expression (qPCR) of IL5, IL13 and the haematopoietic PGD2 synthase (HPGDS). RESULTS: Type 2 markers did not differ across groups except HPGDS mRNA which was highest in non-OAD controls and lowest in COPD. IL5 and IL13 mRNA and PGD2 levels were significantly increased in eosinophilic vs non-eosinophilic severe asthma but did not differ between eosinophilic COPD and eosinophilic severe asthma or non-eosinophilic COPD. HPGDS expression was higher in eosinophilic severe asthma compared with eosinophilic COPD. Results were similar using sputum or blood eosinophil cut-offs. Sputum IL5 and IL13 were highly intercorrelated in severe asthma (r = 0.907, p < 0.001) and COPD (r = 0.824, p < 0.001), were moderately correlated with sputum eosinophils in severe asthma (IL5 r = 0.440, p < 0.001; IL13 r = 0.428, p < 0.001) and were weakly correlated in COPD (IL5 r = 0.245, p < 0.05; IL13 r = 0.317, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Molecular markers of type 2 airway inflammation do not differ between eosinophilic asthma and eosinophilic COPD; however, the relationship between eosinophilia and type 2 airway markers appears weaker in COPD than in severe asthma.