Forgoing Preoperative Manometry for Minimally Invasive Hiatal Hernia Repair.

INTRODUCTION: Hiatal hernia commonly occurs in adults. Although most patients are asymptomatic, some experience reflux symptoms or dysphagia. These patients are frequently managed with acid suppression and lifestyle changes. However, medical management does not provide durable relief for some patients; therefore, surgical repair is considered. Routine preoperative investigations include esophagoscopy, esophagography, and manometry. We investigated the role of preoperative motility studies for the management of these patients when partial fundoplication is planned. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 185 patients who underwent elective minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair with partial fundoplication between 2014 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether a preoperative motility study was performed. The primary outcomes were postoperative dysphagia, complications, postoperative interventions, and use of proton pump inhibitors. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients underwent preoperative manometry and 86 did not. The lack of preoperative manometry was not associated with increased postoperative morbidity, including leak rate, readmission, and 30-d mortality. The postoperative dysphagia rates of the manometry and nonmanometry groups were 5% (5/99 patients) and 7% (6/86 patients) (P = 0.80), respectively. Furthermore, seven of 99 (7%) patients in the manometry group and 10 of 86 (12%) (P = 0.42) patients in the nonmanometry group underwent interventions, mainly endoscopic dilation, postoperatively owing to symptom recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Forgoing preoperative manometry was not associated with significant adverse outcomes after minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Although manometry is reasonable to perform, it should not be considered a mandatory part of the preoperative assessment when partial fundoplication is planned.

Hiatal hernia reporting: time to remove subjectivity?

INTRODUCTION: The size of a hiatal hernia (HH) is a key determinant of the approach for surgical repair. However, endoscopists will often utilize subjective terms, such as "small," "medium," and "large," without any standardized objective correlations. The aim of this study was to identify HHs described using objective axial length measurements versus subjective size allocations and compare them to their corresponding manometry and barium swallow studies. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Retrospective chart reviews were conducted on 93 patients diagnosed endoscopically with HHs between 2017 and 2021 at Newton-Wellesley Hospital. Information was collected regarding their HH subjective size assessment, axial length measurement (cm), manometry results, and barium swallow readings. Linear regression models were used to analyze the correlation between the objective endoscopic axial length measurements and manometry measurements. Ordered logistic regression models were used to correlate the ordinal endoscopic and barium swallow subjective size allocations with the continuous axial length measurements and manometry measurements. RESULTS: Of the 93 endoscopy reports, 42 included a subjective size estimate, 38 had axial length measurement, and 12 gave both. Of the 34 barium swallow reads, only one gave an objective HH size measurement. Axial length measurements were significantly correlated with the manometry measurements (R2 = 0.0957, p = 0.049). The endoscopic subjective size estimates were also closely related to the manometry measurements (R2 = 0.0543, p = 0.0164). Conversely, the subjective size estimates from barium swallow reads were not significantly correlated with the endoscopic axial length measurements (R2 = 0.0143, p = 0.366), endoscopic subjective size estimates (R2 = 0.0481, p = 0.0986), or the manometry measurements (R2 = 0.0418, p = 0.0738). Mesh placement was significantly correlated to pre-operative endoscopic axial length measurement (p = 0.0001), endoscopic subjective size estimate (p = 0.0301), and barium swallow read (p = 0.0211). However, mesh placement was not significantly correlated with pre-operative manometry measurements (0.2227). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic subjective size allocations and objective axial length measurements are associated with pre-operative objective measurements and intra-operative decisions, suggesting both can be used to guide clinical decision making. However, including axial length measurements in endoscopy reports can improve outcomes reporting.

Systematic review of the perioperative classification, diagnosis, description and repair of hiatus hernias in randomized controlled trials.

Hiatus hernias (HH) are a common cause of symptoms and complications, with considerable variation in anatomy, function, diagnosis and treatment. We undertook the first systematic review to appraise how HH are diagnosed and classified in the literature, using randomized controlled trials as a sample. A search was performed in July 2021of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and 2832 articles were identified and 64 were included. Median Jadad score was 2. Studies demonstrated considerable variation in diagnosis, classification and minimum surgical steps. The commonest classifications before surgery were axial length and the Type I-IV classification, variably assessed by endoscopy and contrast swallow. Intra-operatively, the commonest classification was type I-IV. A minority used more than one classification, or alternatives such as defect size and Hill classification. Most studies reported minimum steps, but these varied. Only a minority reported criteria for diagnosing recurrence. Using randomized controlled trials to appraise the highest quality evidence in the literature, we found considerable variation and inconsistency in the way HH are diagnosed and classified. This lack of a 'common language' has significant impacts for the generalizability of evidence, study synthesis and design. We propose the development of an internationally accepted classification. We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.

[Antireflux laparoscopic intervention]. / Primenenie antireflyuksnogo laparoskopicheskogo vmeshatel'stva.

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic fundoplication and hiatal hernia repair for gastroesophageal reflux disease following hiatal hernia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 56 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia .They underwent laparoscopic fundoplication and hiatal hernia repair between January 2020 and January 2023. RESULTS: All surgeries were successful without conversion to open surgery. Surgery time was 56-180 min (mean 68.4±3.6), blood loss 30-200 ml (mean 40.3±5.6). No mortality and severe complications occurred. All patients were followed-up for 6-24 months. The GERD-Q and De Meester scores were significantly lower after 6 months compared to baseline values (p <0.05), and resting pressure was lower. Tone of lower esophageal sphincter was significantly higher compared to preoperative level (p <0.05). In 1-2 years after surgery, symptoms completely disappeared in 48 patients and significantly improved in 6 patients. Two patients had no improvement. Contrast-enhanced examination found no recurrent hiatal hernia and digestive tract obstruction. CONCLUSION. L: Aparoscopic fundoplication and hiatal hernia repair is safe and effective for gastroesophageal reflux disease with hiatal hernia.

Roux-en-Y Gastrojejunostomy: is it an effective treatment for complex Hiatal hernias in the morbidly obese?

BACKGROUND: Primary repair failure rates for hiatal hernias (HH) can reach up to 40%, this is especially high in the morbidly obese patient. There is no clear data on how to manage this patient subset. This paper evaluates the efficacy of Roux-N-Y Gastrojejunostomy (RNY GJ) for treatment of symptomatic HH. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who received a Roux-en-Y Gastrojejunostomy (RNY GJ) for HH at our institution between January 2016 and January 2021 was performed. Patient demographics, symptoms, and post-operative outcomes were recorded and univariate analysis was performed between preoperative and postoperative symptoms. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with a mean age of 56.9 years (SD 11.8) underwent RNY GJ. Patients were mostly female (81.1%) with a mean BMI of 36.8 (SD 8.4). An 78.4% reduction in symptoms of either heartburn, dysphagia, or regurgitation was noted at follow up (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RNY GJ represents a safe procedure for morbidly obese patients with hiatal hernias with no mortalities amongst our patient cohort along with a significant reduction in pre-operative symptoms and no symptomatic recurrences. RNY GJ should be considered as the operation of choice for repair for this patient population.

Research protocol for the Paraesophageal hernia symptom tool, a prospective multi-center cohort study to identify the need and threshold for surgery and assess the symptom response to surgery.

Large hiatus hernias with a significant paraesophageal component (types II-IV) have a range of insidious symptoms. Management of symptomatic hernias includes conservative treatment or surgery. Currently, there is no paraesophageal hernia disease-specific symptom questionnaire. As a result, many clinicians rely on the health-related quality of life questionnaires designed for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GORD) to assess patients with hiatal hernias pre- and postoperatively. In view of this, a paraesophageal hernia symptom tool (POST) was designed. This POST questionnaire now requires validation and assessment of clinical utility. Twenty-one international sites will recruit patients with paraesophageal hernias to complete a series of questionnaires over a five-year period. There will be two cohorts of patients-patients with paraesophageal hernias undergoing surgery and patients managed conservatively. Patients are required to complete a validated GORD-HRQL, POST questionnaire, and satisfaction questionnaire preoperatively. Surgical cohorts will also complete questionnaires postoperatively at 4-6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and then annually for a total of 5 years. Conservatively managed patients will repeat questionnaires at 1 year. The first set of results will be released after 1 year with complete data published after a 5-year follow-up. The main results of the study will be patient's acceptance of the POST tool, clinical utility of the tool, assessment of the threshold for surgery, and patient symptom response to surgery. The study will validate the POST questionnaire and identify the relevance of the questionnaire in routine management of paraesophageal hernias.

Comparison of transnasal esophagoscopy and sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the assessment of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

OBJECTIVE: Transnasal esophagoscopy (TNE) in the awake patient and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in sedation are both used in the assessment of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The objective of this study was to compare these two endoscopic methods in contributing to the diagnosis of LPR. METHODS: This study included 54 patients presenting with signs and symptoms suspicious for LPR, which were examined both by TNE and EGD. The contribution of each method to the diagnosis of LPR was evaluated separately and then compared with each other. RESULTS: In detecting LPR, TNE showed a significant higher sensitivity (94% vs. 60%) and accuracy (93% vs. 59%) than EGD, but their specificity was equal (50% each). The most common pathologic findings in both methods were a hiatal hernia (70% vs. 48%) and gaping cardia (69% vs. 24%), followed by peptic esophagitis (41% vs. 24%). CONCLUSION: The value of EGD is limited in the workup of LPR, as sedation tends to mask the subtle findings in this kind of reflux disease.

Current practice in antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery: exploration of the Belgian field.

BACKGROUND: In Belgium, no publicly available information exists on the spread, quality, results nor follow-up of antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery, in contrast to the recently centralized esophageal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to create a snap shot of the current practice in Belgium. METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed among all members of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery in autumn 2021. A total of 33 questions spread over four sections were asked, covering demographics, current practice (case load, case mix, indications, preoperative workup, patient information, average length of stay, follow up, quality of life (QOL)), operative techniques and future thoughts. RESULTS: Twenty-four surgeons completed the questionnaire. Surgical indications are discussed multidisciplinary and based on guidelines in 67%. Workup includes endoscopy, pH-monitoring and manometry in 100%. Barium swallow, impedance and gastric emptying tests were added in respectively 83%, 42% and 13%. Symptom or QOL scores were used in 17%. About 81% are performed as primary surgery, 18% redo surgery and 1% resections. Laparoscopic procedures are reported in 99%: Nissen(-Rosetti) 79%, Toupet/Lind 15%, partial gastrectomy 5% and Collis gastroplasty 1%. Discharge is planned on POD1 in 42% and on POD2 in 54%. 50% performs follow-up < 1 year. Interest in further clinical research collaboration was expressed in 92%. CONCLUSION: Antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery is not standardized in Belgium. There is an evident variety in clinical practice, but this questionnaire shows similarity amongst respondents regarding workup and surgical approach. There is a willingness for future research collaborations.

Being Caught in a Vicious Circle: An Interview Study of Individuals Suffering From Grade II-IV Hiatal Hernia.

Large paraesophageal hernias are related to life-threatening complications that warrant immediate surgery. Whether the long-standing chronic symptoms related to the disease in individuals without hernia incarceration motivate surgical treatment is still a subject for discussion. The aim of this study was to explore how individuals suffering from Grade II-IV hiatal hernia describe their symptoms and health, as well as how the disease affects their life. Semistructured interviews were performed with 22 individuals planning to undergo surgery for a large paraesophageal hernia. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis and resulted in one main theme "Being caught in a vicious circle" and six subthemes "Distressing and uncertain times," "The symptoms have seized control over my health," "Loss of energy and strength," "Strategies for managing daily life," "Loss of social life," and "Moments of hope despite failing health." Central to the participants' descriptions is their commitment to strategies for managing the ever-present and unpredictable symptoms that have seized control over their health. They were trapped in a hopeless and isolated existence, that is, a vicious circle, from which they were unable to escape. Despite the low incidence of volvulus and incarceration, the symptom burden and effect on general health motivate treatment in these individuals.

[Surgical treatment of hiatal hernia complicated by short esophagus: a prospective study]. / Khirurgicheskoe lechenie gryzh pishchevodnogo otverstiya diafragmy, oslozhnennykh korotkim pishchevodom.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze immediate and long-term postoperative results in patients with hiatal hernia complicated by short esophagus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively analyzed postoperative outcomes in 113 patients with hiatal hernia who underwent surgery between 2013 and 2021. The main group consisted of 54 patients with length of intra-abdominal segment of esophagus <4 cm who underwent Collis procedure or esophagus >4 cm and indications for Nissen fundoplication cuff. The control group consisted of 59 patients and indications for esophageal lengthening procedure only if length of intra-abdominal segment of esophagus was less than 2 cm. This surgery was started with anterolateral vagotomy, and Collis procedure was performed in case of ineffective vagotomy. Nissen fundoplication was performed for abdominal segment of esophagus >2 cm. RESULTS: In the main group, 17 (31.5%) patients with intra-abdominal segment of esophagus <4 cm required Collis procedure. In the control group, length of intra-abdominal segment of esophagus <2 cm was observed in 6 (10.2%) patients. In all cases, anterolateral vagotomy was performed. Surgery time was 189 (80-290) and 136 (90-320) min, respectively (p=0.001). Postoperative complications in the main group occurred in 8 (14.8%) patients, in the control group - 4 (6.8%) patients (p=0.281). One (1.7%) patient died in the control group. The follow-up period was 38 (12-66) months. In long-term period, recurrence developed in 2 (3.7%) and 11 (20%) patients, respectively (p=0.026). High satisfaction with postoperative outcomes was observed in 51 (94.4%) and 46 (79.3%) patients, respectively (p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Uncorrected shortening of the esophagus can be one of the main risk factors of recurrence in long-term period. Expanding the indications for Collis gastroplasty can reduce the incidence of poor outcomes without affecting the incidence of postoperative complications.

Distinct Clinical Physiologic Phenotypes of Patients With Laryngeal Symptoms Referred for Reflux Evaluation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Heterogeneous presentations and disease mechanisms among patients with laryngeal symptoms account for misdiagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), variations in testing, and suboptimal outcomes. We aimed to derive phenotypes of patients with laryngeal symptoms based on clinical and physiologic data and to compare characteristics across phenotypes. METHODS: A total of 302 adult patients with chronic laryngeal symptoms were prospectively enrolled at 3 centers between January 2018 to October 2020 (age 57.2 ± 15.2 years; 30% male; body mass index 27.2 ± 6.0 kg/m2). Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) was applied to 12 clinical and 11 physiologic variables collected in stable condition to derive phenotypic groups. RESULTS: DAPC identified 5 groups, with significant differences across symptoms, hiatal hernia size, and number of reflux events (P < .01). Group A had the greatest hiatal hernia size (3.1 ± 1.0 cm; P < .001) and reflux events (37.5 ± 51; P < .001), with frequent cough, laryngeal symptoms, heartburn, and regurgitation. Group B had the highest body mass index (28.2 ± 4.6 kg/m2; P < .001) and salivary pepsin (150 ± 157 ng/mL; P = .03), with frequent cough, laryngeal symptoms, globus, heartburn, and regurgitation. Group C frequently reported laryngeal symptoms (93%; P < .001), and had fewest esophageal symptoms (9.6%; P < .001) and reflux events (10.7 ± 11.0; P < .001). Group D commonly reported cough (88%; P < .001) and heartburn. Group E (18%) was oldest (62.9 ± 14.3 years; P < .001) and distinguished by highest integrated relaxation pressure. CONCLUSIONS: DAPC identified distinct clinicophysiologic phenotypes of patients with laryngeal symptoms referred for reflux evaluation: group A, LPR and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with hiatal hernia; group B, mild LPR/GERD; group C, no LPR/No GERD; group D, reflex cough; and group E, mixed/possible obstructive esophagogastric junction. Phenotypic differences may inform targeted clinical trials design and improve outcomes.

Development of the ParaOesophageal hernia SympTom (POST) tool.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a symptom severity instrument (ParaOesophageal hernia SympTom (POST) tool) specific to para-oesophageal hernia (POH). METHODS: The POST tool was developed in four stages. The first was establishment of a Steering Committee. In the second stage, items were generated through a systematic review and online scoping survey of international experts. In the third stage, a three-round modified Delphi consensus process was conducted with a group of international experts who were asked to rate the importance of candidate items. An a priori threshold for inclusion was set at 80 per cent. The modified Delphi process culminated in a consensus meeting to develop the first iteration of the tool. In the final stage, two international patient workshops were held to assess the content validity and acceptability of the POST tool. RESULTS: The systematic review and scoping survey generated 64 symptoms, refined to 20 for inclusion in the modified Delphi consensus process. Twenty-six global experts participated in the Delphi consensus process. Five symptoms reached consensus across two rounds: difficulty getting solid foods down, chest pain after meals, difficulty getting liquids down, shortness of breath only after meals, and an early feeling of fullness after eating. The subsequent patient workshops deemed these five symptoms to be relevant and suggested that reflux should be included; these were taken forward to create the final POST tool. CONCLUSION: The POST tool is the first instrument designed to capture POH-specific symptoms. It will allow clinicians to standardize reporting of symptoms of POH and evaluate the response to surgical intervention.

High-Pressure Tactics: Jackhammer Esophagus-Diagnosing Is Easier than Treating.

Diagnosis of esophageal disorders is well ahead of available treatment options. With HRM, for example, one can identify numerous conditions and their variants, which may lose meaning if the clinical and therapeutic implications of these subclassifications are limited. We report an exemplary case of a patient with hiatal hernia complaining of reflux, dysphagia, and chest pain refractory to medical treatment. Jackhammer esophagus was diagnosed and a hybrid approach consisting of POEM and concomitant crural repair and Dor fundoplication is proposed.

Intraoperative diagnosis and treatment of Achalasia using EndoFLIP during Heller Myotomy and Dor fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Manometry is the gold standard diagnostic test for achalasia. However, there are incidences where manometry cannot be obtained preoperatively, or the results of manometry is inconsistent with the patient's symptomatology. We aim to determine if intraoperative use of EndoFLIP can provide a diagnosis of achalasia and provide objective information during Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication. METHODS: To determine the intraoperative diagnostic EndoFLIP values for patients with achalasia, we determined the optimal cut-off points of the distensibility index (DI) between patients with a diagnosis of achalasia and patients with a diagnosis of hiatal hernia. To evaluate the usefulness of EndoFLIP values during Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication, we obtained a cohort of patients with EndoFLIP values obtained after Heller myotomy and after Dor fundoplication as well as Eckardt score before and after surgery. RESULTS: Our analysis of 169 patients (133 hiatal hernia and 36 achalasia) showed that patients with DI < 0.8 have a >99% probability of having achalasia, while DI > 2.3 have a >99% probability of having hiatal hernia. Patients with a DI 0.8-1.3 have a 95% probability of having achalasia, and patients with a DI of 1.4-2.2 have a 94% probability of having a hiatal hernia. There were 40 patients in the cohort to determine objective data during Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication. The DI increased from a median of 0.7 to 3.2 after myotomy and decreased to 2.2 after Dor fundoplication (p < 0.001). The median Eckardt score went down from a median of 4.5 to 0 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that intraoperative use of EndoFLIP can facilitate the diagnosis of achalasia and is used as an adjunct to diagnose achalasia when symptoms are inconsistent. The routine use of EndoFLIP during Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication provides objective data during the operation in a group of patients with excellent short-term outcomes.

Can subjective symptoms predict objective findings in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients?

INTRODUCTION: Medical therapy is the first-line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease, but surgical options are available and shown to be effective when medical management fails. There is no consensus for when a surgical evaluation is indicated. We set out to determine if the GERD-HRQL questionnaire scores correlate to objective findings found in patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery to predict when surgical consultation could be warranted. METHODS: A prospectively gathered database was used for patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery from January 2014 to September 2020. Inclusion criteria required a diagnosis of GERD and comprehensive esophageal workup with the GERD-HRQL questionnaire, EGD, esophageal manometry, and ambulatory pH monitoring. Analysis of the GERD-HRQL scores was compared to objective endpoints to see correlation and predictability. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess relationship between the presence of objective findings and GERD-HRQL questionnaire scores. RESULTS: There were 246 patients meeting inclusion criteria. There was no significant correlation between GERD-HRQL score and DeMeester score (correlation coefficient = 0.23), or presence of a hiatal hernia, regardless of size (p = 0.89). Patients with esophagitis had significantly higher average GERD-HRQL scores compared to those without esophagitis (40.1 ± 18.9 vs 30.4 ± 19.1, p < 0.0001). Patients with a score of 40 or greater had a 42% to 65% probability of having esophagitis versus a score of 30 or less, lowering the chances of having esophagitis to less than 35%. CONCLUSION: Usage of a GERD-HRQL questionnaire score can potentially show the correlation between subjective and objective findings in the workup of a patient for anti-reflux surgery. Specifically, patients with a GERD-HRQL score of 40 or greater have an increased probability of esophagitis compared to those with a score of 30 or less. Using these scores can help referring clinicians identify those patients failing medical therapy and allow for prompt referral for surgical evaluation.

Gastric obstruction secondary to abdominal re-herniation of a giant hiatal hernia. An illustrative case to understand the pathophysiology of gastric volvulus.

Purpose: To depict the characteristics of a special type of gastric volvulus caused by acute re-herniation of a previous hiatal hernia.Materials and methods: We present the case of a male patient with known history of a giant hiatal hernia who presented to our emergency department with a chief complaint of epigastric pain, oral intolerance and incoercible vomiting in the last 24 h. On suspicion of abdominal complication, an emergent computed tomography (CT) scan was performed.Results: Gastric volvulus secondary to downward re-herniation of the fundus into the abdominal cavity was the cause of this patient's symptoms. This mechanism, which was demonstrated by comparing the CT findings of the acute episode with previous imaging studies, reveals a largely unrecognized pathogenic mechanism of gastric volvulus.Conclusions: Acute gastric volvulus should be suspected in patients with hiatal hernia. CT allows its diagnosis and likely underlying pathophysiological mechanism.

Improving pre-bariatric surgery diagnosis of hiatal hernia using machine learning models.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric patients have a high prevalence of hiatal hernia (HH). HH imposes various difficulties in performing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Preoperative evaluation is generally inaccurate, establishing the need for better preoperative assessment. OBJECTIVE: To utilize machine learning ability to improve preoperative diagnosis of HH. METHODS: Machine learning (ML) prediction models were utilized to predict preoperative HH diagnosis using data from a prospectively maintained database of bariatric procedures performed in a high-volume bariatric surgical center between 2012 and 2015. We utilized three optional ML models to improve preoperative contrast swallow study (SS) prediction, automatic feature selection was performed using patients' features. The prediction efficacy of the models was compared to SS. RESULTS: During the study period, 2482 patients underwent bariatric surgery. All underwent preoperative SS, considered the baseline diagnostic modality, which identified 236 (9.5%) patients with presumed HH. Achieving 38.5% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity. ML models increased sensitivity up to 60.2%, creating three optional models utilizing data and patient selection process for this purpose. CONCLUSION: Implementing machine learning derived prediction models enabled an increase of up to 1.5 times of the baseline diagnostic sensitivity. By harnessing this ability, we can improve traditional medical diagnosis, increasing the sensitivity of preoperative diagnostic workout.

Cardiac Arrest Caused by an Acute Intrathoracic Gastric Volvulus Treated With Percutaneous Gastrostomy.

During cardiopulmonary resuscitation, one of the first priorities after establishing basic and advanced life support is to identify the cause of the arrest. We present a rare case of cardiac arrest due to a decreased venous return from mediastinal shift caused by a paraesophageal hernia with an incarcerated thoracic gastric volvulus, which was treated by percutaneous gastrostomy.

[Collis gastroplasty in surgical treatment of hiatal hernia]. / Primenenie gastroplastiki po Kollisu v khirurgicheskom lechenii gryzh pishchevodnogo otverstiya diafragmy.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the early and long-term postoperative outcomes after Collis gastroplasty in the treatment of patients with hiatal hernia complicated by gastroesophageal reflux disease and shortening of the esophagus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Postoperative outcomes after Collis gastroplasty were analyzed in 22 patients with hiatal hernia and shortening of the esophagus. The control group consisted of 166 patients after simple repair of hiatal hernia without Collis procedure. RESULTS: In case of Collis gastroplasty, surgery time was 185 (160-250) min. Intraoperative complications were observed in 3 (13.6%) patients, incidence of postoperative complications - 18.2%. There were no lethal outcomes in this group of patients. Mild functional dysphagia was observed in 2 (9.1%) patients. Length of hospital stay was 7.8±2.4 days. Mean follow-up was 34 (6-52) months. There were no anatomical recurrences. A relapse of gastroesophageal reflux was noted in 1 (4.6%) case. GERD-HRQL score was 4.8±2.2 points. Additional Collis gastroplasty did not affect the immediate and long-term results of surgical treatment in comparison with simple cruroraphy and fundoplication. CONCLUSION: Unreduced shortening of the esophagus may be followed by high incidence of recurrent hiatal hernia and GERD in long-term period. In case of shortening of the esophagus, surgery should include Collis gastroplasty. This effective and safe procedure does not impair treatment outcomes. Indications and optimal technique of Collis gastroplasty require clarification and further research.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use After Hiatal Hernia Repair: Inhibitor of Recurrent Symptoms and Potential Revisional Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia recurrence after hiatal hernia repair (HHR) is often underdiagnosed and underreported but may present with recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. Because of their availability, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is common and may mask patients who would benefit from revisional surgery, which has been shown to improve symptoms and quality of life. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate recurrence patterns of patients who underwent HHR, specifically for the indication of GERD, from 2007 to 2015 at a single Veterans Administration Medical Center. Clinicopathologic parameters were reviewed for association with hiatal hernia recurrence, including postoperative PPI use. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were identified with a median follow-up time of 57.8 mo. Thirty-eight patients developed an anatomic recurrence, which did not demonstrate any associated factors on univariate analysis. Seventy percent of patients remained or were restarted on PPI after their initial surgery. For patients with a documented recurrence, the median time to start a PPI was 224 d, but the time to identify recurrence on imaging or endoscopy was 712.5 d. Eleven (39.3%) patients had a reintervention for anatomic recurrence, of which all had developed recurrent symptoms of GERD. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who developed recurrent hiatal hernia were restarted on PPI without workup for their symptoms. The time of initiation of PPI was much earlier than the time of identification of a recurrent hiatal hernia. The use of PPIs in patients whom have undergone HHR may delay proper workup to identify recurrent hiatal hernia amenable to surgical repair and should be reserved until patients develop recurrent symptoms and have at least begun a diagnostic workup to rule out an anatomic cause for the recurrent symptoms.