Effectiveness of Targeted Nursing Measures to Relieve Swollen Limb Pain after Extremity Fracture.

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of targeted nursing measures in relieving swollen limb pain after extremity fractures. The term "targeted nursing measures" refers to specific nursing interventions and care strategies that are designed to address the issue of swollen limb pain in patients with extremity fractures. Methods: Patients with extremity fractures treated in our hospital between January 2020 and December 2021 were recruited for eligibility assessment, and 100 patients were eventually included and assigned alternately at the time of admission to receive routine care, namely standard nursing interventions commonly provided to individuals with extremity fractures (These interventions included preoperative assessment, vital sign monitoring, postoperative status monitoring, local ice application, elevation of the affected limb, functional exercise, pain relief measures, postoperative nutrition, medication administration, and general health instruction) (routine group) or targeted care, namely care measures tailored to address swollen limb pain. (These targeted care measures included health education regarding the causes of limb fractures, precautions, causes of swollen limb pain after fractures, and treatment methods, decongestion care, ice compresses to promote vasoconstriction and reduce pain and swelling, psychological counseling to relieve negative emotions, and targeted rehabilitation training supervision) (targeted group), with 50 patients in each group. Outcome measures included swelling, pain, emotional state, and nursing satisfaction. Results: Targeted care resulted in better mitigation of swelling versus routine care (P < .05). Patients with targeted care had significantly lower visual analog scale (VAS) scores, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores, and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) scores, and higher Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) scores versus those with routine care (P < .05). Targeted care was associated with significantly higher nursing satisfaction versus routine care (P < .05). Conclusion: Targeted care rapidly relieves the degree of swelling and pain of patients with extremity fractures and ameliorates their emotional state, thereby promoting health recovery and effectively improving patient satisfaction.

American Society for Pain Management Nursing and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association Position Statement: Pain Management at the End of Life.

Fundamental to the quality of life is assisting patients in relieving pain including at the end of life. Compassionate, effective, evidence-based pain care for the dying improves the quality of life for patients and may reduce distress and complicated bereavement in the loved ones witnessing this death. However, efforts designed to mitigate the consequences of the opioid epidemic have seriously compromised pain care at the end of life. This has created an urgent need to focus on the barriers to relief, and solutions necessary to provide safe and effective pain and symptom management in this population. To that end, a committee of experts was convened by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing and the Hospice and Palliative Nursing Association. These experts reviewed the current literature, developed a draft position statement which underwent consecutive revisions. This statement was then endorsed by the respective organizations. Elucidation of barriers to effective pain control in advanced disease allows targeted interventions; including those related to clinical care, education, accessibility, and research. As nurses, we must continuously advocate for humane and dignified care, promoting ethical, effective pain and symptom management at the end of life for all.

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale.

BACKGROUND: The Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale (NCPMCS) is a tool to explore nurses' competencies and subjective experiences in cancer pain management, and to help nurses understand their current shortcomings in cancer pain management. The scale, currently available only in English and translated into Chinese for wider adoption abroad, provides a tool for Chinese nurses to assess their level of cancer pain management. Furthermore, based on the scale's specific score, they can evaluate their lack of understanding about cancer pain management, advance research into this area, and enhance their capacity to control cancer pain while providing patient care. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to translate and localize the new scale, and to measure its reliability and validity. The study was also to provide a way to quickly and accurately measure the competency of cancer pain management among nursing staff in China. METHODS: The Bristling translation approach was used to translate, translate back, and culturally modify the English version of the cancer pain management competency scale for nurses to create the Chinese version. A convenience sample was used for the study, 220 clinical nurses from three Grade III hospitals in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China, were chosen by convenience sampling. The Chinese version of the scale was used for this investigation. RESULTS: The Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale for Nurses has 14 items over 4 dimensions in its Chinese form. From the exploratory factor analysis, four common components were recovered; the cumulative variance rate was 81.994%, the scale's Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.902, and the Cronbach's α coefficient for each dimension ranged from 0.800 to 0.938. Retest reliability was 0.915, scale content validity was 0.865, and Spearman-Brown's broken half reliability was 0.808. CONCLUSION: Nurses' cancer pain management competency in clinics can be assessed using the Chinese version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale, which has strong validity and reliability.

Pain care for children with cognitive impairment: A parent-nurse partnership.

PURPOSE: To explore nurses' experiences of establishing partnerships with parents for pain care of hospitalized children with cognitive impairment (CI) and identify related facilitators and barriers. DESIGN AND METHODS: In this qualitative, interpretive descriptive study, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted via videoconferencing with pediatric nurses from inpatient wards in a Canadian pediatric quaternary hospital. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using an inductive, data-driven thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Eleven nurses were interviewed. The overarching theme was Assessing Pain as an Outsider: "A Complete Guessing Game". Seven major themes were identified.: Relying on Parent Expertise for Pain Assessment, Brainstorming with Parents for Pain Treatment, Supporting Parents as Advocates for Pain Care, Individualizing Pain Care with Parents, Involving the Child in Pain Care: A Spectrum, Barriers to Partnership in Pain Care and Facilitators to Partnership in Pain Care. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses described the many ways they involve parents as partners in pain care. However, nurses shared strong feelings of uncertainty associated with pain care in children with CI. Consequently, nurses felt the need to rely on parents for appropriately assessing and treating pain in children with CI. Findings highlighted the practice and education gaps that may contribute to nurses' uncertainty and reliance on parents. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: By identifying related practice and education gaps, healthcare organizations can implement strategies to further support nurses in establishing partnerships and potentially optimize pain care practices.

Pain Assessment in the Outpatient Pediatric Burn Patient: An Integrative Review.

BACKGROUND: There is no standardized practice in pediatric pain assessment with burn injuries in the outpatient clinic setting. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify reliable, validated tools to measure pain in the pediatric burn clinic population. METHODS: The literature search for this integrative review was conducted using the databases of PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane, and Embase from 2011 to 2023. Quality and relevance were appraised using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model. Reporting was done according to a Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist. RESULTS: Fourteen articles and two clinical practice guidelines met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. CONCLUSION: The Pain Observation Scale for Young Children and the COMFORT Behavior Scale tools have shown good reliability and construct validity and can be safely used to measure background and procedural pain in daily burn practice. Further research on reliable, validated pain assessment techniques in the pediatric burn population is needed.

Pain Management and Education for Ambulatory Surgery: A Qualitative Study of Perioperative Nurses.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory surgery presents unique challenges regarding adequate pain management and education. Studies have documented issues with transfer of information and patient comfort. Our objective was to explore perioperative nurses' perspectives of current practices and challenges with pain management and education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a qualitative descriptive design and conducted four focus group interviews, with 24 total participants from two perioperative areas of an academic medical center, using a standardized script. Using qualitative analysis software, two investigators reviewed the data and coded major themes and subthemes. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies guidelines were followed for reporting the data. RESULTS: We identified four major themes impacting current perioperative pain management and education practices: communication among the perioperative care team, sources of nurses' frustrations in the perioperative setting, patient expectations for pain, and nurse-driven pain management and education. Nurses highlighted their work became easier with adequate information transfer and trust from physicians. Frustrations stemmed from surgeon, system, and patient factors. Nurses often use their clinical experience and judgment in managing patients throughout the perioperative period. Furthermore, nurses felt patients have limited pain education and stressed education throughout the surgical care pathway could improve overall care. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative pain management, assessment, and education practices are inconsistent, incomplete, and sources of frustrations according to participants. Participant experiences highlight the need for improved and standardized models. Patient pain education should use a multidisciplinary approach, beginning at the point of surgery scheduling and continuing through postoperative follow-up.

Nonpharmacologic approaches to pain management.

ABSTRACT: This article discusses nonpharmacologic pain management interventions for alternative or concomitant use with nonopioid medications. Potential barriers as well as facilitators to integrating nonpharmacologic interventions are discussed as they relate to nursing practice.

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: What nurses should know.

ABSTRACT: Local or regional anesthetics are becoming more common pain management options for patients, especially considering concerns regarding opioid use disorders. Though mostly safe, these interventions may carry serious risks such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST). This article discusses LAST and the importance of recognizing its signs and symptoms.

Managing pain in seriously ill patients with substance use disorders.

ABSTRACT: Managing pain can be challenging, especially in patients with serious illnesses and a history of substance use disorders. This article discusses the challenges of addressing pain in these patients and offers perspectives regarding their clinical management.

Nurses' experiences of providing nonpharmacological pain management in palliative care: A qualitative study.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences and views of nurses who provide nonpharmacological therapies for chronic pain management in palliative care. BACKGROUND: Nursing expertise in palliative care is essential in providing pain relief to patients with chronic diseases. Examinations of the use of nonpharmacological therapies for chronic pain management in palliative care have revealed what nonpharmacological therapies have been used, but there is insufficient knowledge regarding nurses' attitudes, views and experiences regarding pain therapies in this context. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive design was chosen. METHODS: Data were collected through individual interviews in a purposive sample with 15 nurses to ensure maximum variation. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. This study aligns with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. RESULTS: The analysis yielded four categories, as follows: "building and sustaining favourable therapeutic relationships" involved the creation of trust and a solid relationship; in "recognising the diversity of patients' needs," person-centred care is expressed as being vital for individualised nonpharmacological pain management; "incorporating significant others" describes how nurses can help to ease the patient's pain by identifying positive encounters with family members or friends; and in "recognising the existence of barriers," nurses highlight vulnerable groups such as children, for whom nurses require special education to enable optimal nonpharmacological pain management. CONCLUSION: The unique knowledge that nurses gain about the patient through the nurse-patient relationship is central and crucial for successful nonpharmacological pain management. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study emphasises the need for nurses to get to know their patient and to be open and sensitive to patients' descriptions of their unique life situations, as this provides the necessary knowledge for optimal care and pain management. Nurses should be encouraged and given the opportunity to attend specialised training in palliative care and pain management.

Pain assessment and interventions by nurses in the emergency department: A national survey.

AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the knowledge, perceptions and factors influencing pain assessment and management practices among Australian emergency nurses. BACKGROUND: Pain is the most commonly reported symptom in patients presenting to the emergency department, with over half rating their pain as moderate-to-severe. Patients unable to communicate, such as critically ill intubated patients, are at greater risk of inadequate pain management. DESIGN: This cross-sectional exploratory study used survey methodology to explore knowledge, perceptions and factors influencing pain management practices among Australian emergency nurses. METHODS: Australian emergency nurses were invited to complete an online survey comprising 91 items. The response rate was 450 of 1,488 (30.2%). STROBE guidelines were used in reporting this study. RESULTS: Variations in level of acute pain management knowledge, especially in older, cognitively impaired or mechanically ventilated patients were identified. Poor interprofessional communication, workload and staffing negatively impacted on nurses' intention to administer analgesia. For intubated patients, validated observation pain assessment instruments were rarely used, although respondents recognised the importance of pain management in critically ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency nurses recognise the importance of pain relief. The ability to nurse-initiate analgesia, education and training in pain management education is variable. Little education is provided on assessing and managing acute pain in elderly, cognitively impaired or mechanically ventilated patients. Use of validated pain assessment instruments to assess pain in critically ill patients is poor. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: While pain management is the responsibility of all healthcare professionals, in the emergency department, it is a core role of emergency nursing. This study highlights the variation in ability to nurse-initiate analgesia, level of acute pain knowledge, education and training, and use of validated pain assessment instruments to guide pain management in critically ill intubated patients.

Nursing Assessment of Wound-Related Pain: An Italian Learning Survey.

BACKGROUND: Pain is an important symptom in wound management, and the choice of treatment directly affects the patient's quality of life. Pain assessment (PA) is essential for quality wound care and, in Italy, mandatory by law. OBJECTIVE: To administer a dedicated learning survey to obtain a better sense of current PA practices, ensure more training, improve procedures, and reduce malpractice. METHODS: A 16-month learning survey of nurses based on a validated questionnaire developed for this project. RESULTS: The survey sample comprised 512 questionnaires. Of respondents, 78% were female, 56.1% were older than 40 years, 94% were RNs, and 6% were wound care specialist nurses. Participants performed a range of dressing changes per week (1-5, 46.3%; 6-20, 34.4%; >21, 19.3%). Although 93% of respondents considered PA important, only 26% recognized it as a vital parameter, and barely one-quarter (25.4%) were aware of current legislation mandating PA. The majority (95.3%) believed that PA is not consistent with pain perceived by the patient. Further, 87.3% stated that they did not have adequate knowledge to conduct a PA, 91.4% did not consider themselves up-to-date on PA, and 81% did not document PA results. However, specific wound care training leads to significantly better PA (P < .001): 71.9% of wound care specialist nurses recognized pain as a vital parameter, and 59.4% were aware of current legislation regarding PA; further, 81.3% consistently evaluated pain, 59.4% documented PA results, and 50% communicated the outcome to the physician in charge. CONCLUSIONS: The results illustrate the lack of sensitivity, training, and education that Italian RNs have regarding PA in wound care.

Improving practice and informing policy development: The impact of gerontological nursing research.

Nurses have always approached the clinical care challenges they encounter with a combination of critical observation and a profound concern for human suffering. Beginning in earnest in the early 1980s, nurse researchers have pursued the answers to questions about the wellbeing of older adults, particularly those suffering from serious, chronic conditions. This paper offers three exemplars of nursing research domains that illustrate the creativity and commitment of nurse researchers seeking to understand and improve pervasive clinical problems experienced by older adults and to demonstrate the profound influence these activities have had on the evolution of the science and the quality of care for older adults. The impact of this work is reflected in practice protocols, institutional policies, government oversight, and improved outcomes for patients.

Chronic non-cancer pain management by nurses in specialist pain clinics.

BACKGROUND: Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is one of the major causes of disability globally, and patients who suffer from it are a complex population, which makes it difficult to provide effective care. Specialist pain clinics and nursing professionals in them are the main care providers, but there is little research conducted in this field. AIM: To explore the attitudes and knowledge of nurses working in specialist pain clinics regarding care of CNCP patients. METHODS: Qualitative phenomenological approach. Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2017 with nurses who worked in specialist pain clinics in six hospitals in southern Spain. RESULTS: Data analysis led to the formation of two categories, 'being trained and improving knowledge in CNCP' and 'the challenge of caring for patients with CNCP', and five subcategories. CONCLUSION: The need for care in CNCP is not covered by nurses in all the areas it requires. Lack of time, staffing issues, and specific training in this area makes it difficult to provide care. However, some areas for improvement are proposed, such as psychological interventions, group workshops, continuous training, and multidisciplinary teams.

Reviewing pain management options for patients in active labor.

Pain perception and preferences for pain management are unique to each woman in labor. This article provides an overview of the physiology of labor pain, discusses available nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic approaches to managing pain during active labor, and discusses potential benefits and risks for each option.

Managing postoperative pain with opioid-sparing therapies.

ABSTRACT: The analgesic properties of opioids make them valuable pharmacologic options for patients with severe post-op pain, but healthcare providers must be cautious due to opioid-related adverse reactions. This article reviews select nonopioid adjuvant and adjunctive medications, as well as select nonpharmacologic therapies, as part of a multimodal approach to postoperative analgesia. The role of nurses in assessing, monitoring, and educating patients is also explored.

[Pain management in nursing care in outpatient older adults in need of care]. / Pflegerisches Schmerzmanagement bei ambulant versorgten Pflegebedürftigen.

Pain management in nursing care in outpatient older adults in need of care Abstract. Background: International data report a prevalence rate for chronic pain of up to 50 % in community dwelling older adults (> 65 years). A national study reported a prevalence rate of 68,5 % among outpatient adults (≥ 18 years). Nursing care has an important meaning in pain management. However, previous research on the quality of pain management in nursing care is insufficient. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness of pain management in nursing care in our target group. Method: The cross-sectional study is based on data from ACHE. The study comprises 219 patients. Information on subjective pain experience and pain management were obtained by face-to-face interviews and nursing documentation. Results: Our findings indicate considerable deficits in terms of pain management in nursing care. Results show a lack of systematic pain assessment as well as missing documentation of therapeutic aims and pain management in nursing care. Conclusions: The identified deficits might be the result of current framework conditions that separate nursing pain treatment in Volume V and Volume XI of the German Social Security Code services. Appropriateness in pain management in nursing care can only be ensured if framework conditions are optimized.

The Effect of Educational Strategies Targeted for Nurses on Pain Assessment and Management in Children: An Integrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Nurses play an important role in children's pain assessment and management because they spend the majority of the time with them and provide care on a 24-hour basis. However, research studies continue to report on nurses' inadequate assessment and management of children's pain, which may be partly attributed to their insufficient education in this area. OBJECTIVES: This integrative review sought to examine the effect of strategies used in educating nurses on pediatric pain assessment and management. DESIGN: An integrative review. DATA SOURCES: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, PubMed/ Medline and Scopus. REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS: Four databases were searched up to February 2018 based on a prescribed eligibility criteria. The review included 37 studies with varied methodologic quality. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that various types of educational strategies improve nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practice of pain assessment, management, and/or documentation. CONCLUSIONS: Developing a responsive program that includes expectations of beneficiaries, integrating it into existing facility training systems and delivering it through multidisciplinary collaboration, offers the benefit of securing sustainability of the educational gains.

ASPMN 2019 Position Statement: Pain Assessment in the Patient Unable to Self-Report.

Managing pain in those vulnerable populations who are unable to self-report or communicate is challenging due to difficulty recognizing pain presence and severity. As no valid and reliable objective measure of pain exists, the ASPMN supports assessment practice recommendations that gather relevant information to infer presence of pain and evaluate response to intervention. Nurses and other healthcare professionals must be advocates for those who are unable to speak for themselves regarding their pain experience.

Knowledge and Attitudes about Pain Management among Canadian Nursing Students.

BACKGROUND: Poorly managed pain is a problem that affects individuals, entire health care systems, and societies worldwide. Nurses are involved in pain management, yet little is known about the knowledge and attitudes of nursing students. AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine preregistration nursing students' knowledge and attitudes about the assessment and management of pain. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional, descriptive survey. SETTINGS: Four education sites from two post-secondary institutions in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: A convenience sample of 336 final year Bachelor of Science in Nursing and practical nursing students. METHODS: Participants were recruited in the classroom setting to complete the Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain. A score of eighty percent is considered a pass. RESULTS: Ninety percent of students who were in class on the day of the survey agreed to participate (n = 336/373). Fifteen (4.5%) participants passed the Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain, and the mean score was 66.7% (standard deviation 9.1). English as primary language, institution attended, and prior experience caring for someone with pain were independently associated with higher scores (p < .05). Students were found to have major gaps in knowledge and attitudes related to understanding the risk of respiratory depression after opioid therapy, calculating medication dosages, administrating medication, and understanding pharmacology. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of nursing students in this sample did not have adequate knowledge and positive attitudes about pain assessment and management.