Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 589
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(4): 579-583, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30772166

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the current state of gender diversity among invited coordinators at the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Annual Scientific Meeting and to compare the academic productivity of female interventional radiologists to that of invited male coordinators. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Faculty rosters for the SIR Annual Scientific Meetings from 2015 to 2017 were stratified by gender to quantify female representation among those asked to lead and coordinate podium sessions. To quantify academic productivity and merit, H-index, publications, and authorship by females over a 6-year period (2012-2017) were statistically compared to that of recurring male faculty. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2017, women held 7.1% (9/126), 4.3%, (8/188), and 13.7% (27/197) of the available coordinator positions for podium sessions, with no representation at the plenary sessions, and subject matter expertise was concentrated in economics and education. Academic productivity of the top quartile of published female interventional radiologists was statistically similar to that of the invited male faculty (H-index P = .722; total publications P = .689; and authorship P = .662). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that senior men dominate the SIR Annual Scientific Meeting, with few women leading or coordinating the podium sessions, despite their established academic track record.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Radiólogos/tendencias , Radiología Intervencionista/educación , Sexismo/tendencias , Especialización/tendencias , Mujeres Trabajadoras , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Radiólogos/educación , Radiología Intervencionista/tendencias , Sociedades Médicas/tendencias , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(4): 584-588.e2, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30824306

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the evolving representation of women in the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the available gender demographic data of various SIR subgroups between 2008 and 2017 was performed. The gender makeup of the following groups was analyzed: SIR membership, SIR Executive Council members and officers, Annual Meeting invited speakers, committee chairs, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (JVIR) first and senior authors, JVIR editorial board, IR Quarterly (IRQ) authors, and active interventional radiology (IR) residents and fellows. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2017, the percentage of female representation in SIR members doubled (from 6% to 13.1%). In the same period, female representation also significantly increased in Executive Council members (0% to 20%) and officers (0% to 50%), SIR Annual Meeting presenters (5.1% to 15.4%), and JVIR first authors (10% to 14.5%) and senior authors (7.1% to 11.9%). From 2012 to 2017, there were increases in female representation among SIR committee chairs (21% to 28%) and IRQ authors (4.5% to 27%). However, the percentage of female IR residents and fellows did not significantly change between 2008 and 2017 (11% vs 16.2%; P = .51). CONCLUSIONS: Women interventional radiologists are underrepresented within SIR, representing only 9.2% of active IR physicians. There has been a steady increase in female representation within most areas of SIR evaluated in this study. Although these trends are reassuring, efforts toward increasing recruitment and retention of women in IR need to improve in light of the infancy of IR as a residency program.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Radiólogos/tendencias , Radiología Intervencionista/tendencias , Sexismo/tendencias , Especialización/tendencias , Mujeres Trabajadoras , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Radiólogos/educación , Radiología Intervencionista/educación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sociedades Médicas/tendencias , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación
3.
Anesth Analg ; 128(1): 137-143, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30096082

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gender inequity is still prevalent in today's medical workforce. Previous studies have investigated the status of women in academic anesthesiology. The objective of this study is to provide a current update on the status of women in academic anesthesiology. We hypothesized that while the number of women in academic anesthesiology has increased in the past 10 years, major gender disparities continue to persist, most notably in leadership roles. METHODS: Medical student, resident, and faculty data were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges. The number of women in anesthesiology at the resident and faculty level, the distribution of faculty academic rank, and the number of women chairpersons were compared across the period from 2006 to 2016. The gender distribution of major anesthesiology journal editorial boards and data on anesthesiology research grant awards, among other leadership roles, were collected from websites and compared to data from 2005 and 2006. RESULTS: The number (%) of women anesthesiology residents/faculty has increased from 1570 (32%)/1783 (29%) in 2006 to 2145 (35%)/2945 (36%) in 2016 (P = .004 and P < .001, respectively). Since 2006, the odds that an anesthesiology faculty member was a woman increased approximately 2% per year, with an estimated odds ratio of 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 1.014-1.025; P < .001). In 2015, the percentage of women anesthesiology full professors (7.4%) was less than men full professors (17.3%) (difference, -9.9%; 95% confidence interval of the difference, -8.5% to -11.3%; P < .001). The percentage of women anesthesiology department chairs remained unchanged from 2006 to 2016 (12.7% vs 14.0%) (P = .75). To date, neither Anesthesia & Analgesia nor Anesthesiology has had a woman Editor-in-Chief. The percentage of major research grant awards to women has increased significantly from 21.1% in 1997-2007 to 31.5% in 2007-2016 (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Gender disparities continue to exist at the upper levels of leadership in academic anesthesiology, most importantly in the roles of full professor, department chair, and journal editors. However, there are some indications that women may be on the path to leadership parity, most notably, the growth of women in anesthesiology residencies and faculty positions and increases in major research grants awarded to women.


Asunto(s)
Anestesiólogos/tendencias , Anestesiología/tendencias , Docentes Médicos/tendencias , Liderazgo , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Sexismo/tendencias , Mujeres Trabajadoras , Anestesiólogos/educación , Anestesiología/educación , Educación Médica/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación
6.
Appetite ; 105: 106-13, 2016 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27179936

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Women with children often fulfil multiple roles of running a household, raising a family and working outside the home. Good nutrition during this time is important to optimise their performance and prevent lifestyle diseases. Women also act as nutritional gatekeepers for their family. The dual burden of paid employment and unpaid family work may be associated with time scarcity in mothers which can impact food preparation and therefore nutritional adequacy. The aim of this study was to examine the diet of women who lived with children by comparison of hours worked. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2011-12. Subjects were women aged 18-65 years who resided with ≥1 child (<18 years). Women were grouped according to hours of employment: not working; working <25 h a week; and working ≥25 hours a week. Data from two 24-h dietary recalls were used to compare differences between groups in nutrient intake and proportion of energy from discretionary foods. Covariates included were age, education, smoker status, Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), number of persons in household, week or weekend day of the survey and the sequence of recalls. RESULTS: Analyses included 1869 women. Dietary intakes varied minimally between groups with intakes of fibre, vitamin C, and calcium lowest in the group not working. Overall diet quality was poor with >30% of energy coming from discretionary foods in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Usual hours of employment per week have a minimal effect on diet quality in women with children. It is likely that different factors specific to each group contribute to the poor dietary intakes and should be further investigated.


Asunto(s)
Dieta Saludable , Empleo , Madres , Cooperación del Paciente , Mujeres Trabajadoras , Actividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Dieta Saludable/etnología , Escolaridad , Composición Familiar/etnología , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Madres/educación , Encuestas Nutricionales , Cooperación del Paciente/etnología , Factores de Tiempo , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación , Adulto Joven
7.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 474(9): 1957-61, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27075329

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic fellowship training is a common step before becoming a practicing orthopaedic surgeon. In the past, fellowship decisions in orthopaedics were made early in the residency and without a formal match. The process was disorganized, often not fair to the applicants or fellowship programs. More recently, there has been an organized match process for nine different disciplines in orthopaedics. Although the numbers of women applicants into orthopaedic residency has been reported and is the target of efforts to continue to improve gender diversity in orthopaedics, the numbers regarding women in orthopaedic fellowships have not been known. Other details including if there is a difference in match rate between male and female fellowship applicants and what discipline they choose to pursue across orthopaedic surgery has not been reported. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How have the numbers of women applying to orthopaedic fellowships changed over a 5-year period? (2) Is gender associated with fellowship match success? (3) Which subspecialties have greater proportions of female applicants? METHODS: Available orthopaedic residency match data regarding number of applicants and number of female residents between 2010 and 2014 were obtained. For fellowship data, our method was a review of the applicants who submitted rank lists and the number of applicants who matched in all subspecialties through San Francisco Match and from the American Shoulder and Elbow Society from 2010 to 2014. For each year, the number of females versus males applying was abstracted. The total number of females versus males who matched was then obtained. For each subspecialty represented in this article, the number of female applicants and matches was compared with the male applicants and matches. RESULTS: The proportion of fellowship applicants who are female ranged from 7% to 10% annually, and the percentage of matched female applicants ranged from 8% to 12%. Overall, combining results from 2010 to 2014, female fellowship applicants had a higher proportion of match success when compared with men (women: 320 of 335 [96%]; men: 2696 of 3325 [81%]; p < 0.001). Pediatric orthopaedic fellowships had the highest proportion of women (79 of 318 [25%] followed by foot and ankle (42 of 311 [14%]; spine had the lowest (15 of 525 [3%]). CONCLUSIONS: Women applicants for advanced orthopaedic training matched at a higher proportion than men in fellowship training. Pediatrics has a higher proportion of women applicants and fellows. Orthopaedics should be a model for other surgical specialties by encouraging women to successfully pursue advanced training.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Becas/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ortopedia , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialización/estadística & datos numéricos , Mujeres Trabajadoras/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/educación , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/psicología , Ortopedia/educación , Médicos Mujeres/psicología , Factores Sexuales , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación , Mujeres Trabajadoras/psicología , Recursos Humanos
8.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 474(9): 1945-9, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27075331

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The process of choosing medical specialty and residency programs is multifaceted. Today's generation of medical students may have an increased interest in work-life balance and time with their families. In considering this factor, medical students may be influenced by policy regarding maternity, paternity, and adoption leave during residency and fellowship training. Current policy among orthopaedic programs regarding maternity, paternity, and adoption leave is not well described. To understand the influence these policies may have on the choices that medical students make in choosing their specialty, the policies must first be better understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of orthopaedic programs have formal or unwritten policies regarding maternity, paternity, and adoptive leave? (2) What are the provisions for time away, allotment of time, and makeup options for trainees who take leave? (3) What proportion of orthopaedic programs report utilization of leave, and what proportions of leave are for maternity, paternity, or adoptive reasons? METHODS: Accredited programs in orthopaedic surgery were identified through the Council of Orthopedic Residency Directors within the American Orthopaedic Association. Current program directors of these accredited programs were surveyed. The survey was emailed to 144 program directors, of which 141 emails were delivered. Responses were received from 45 program directors, representing 31% of programs. The survey focused on maternity, paternity, and adoptive leave, and it consisted of questions designed to explore program policies (formal, unwritten, no policy, or in development), time considerations (amount allowed, allocation of time away, and makeup requirements), and utilization (trainees who took leave and type of leave used). RESULTS: Most respondents have maternity leave policy (formal: 36 of 45 [80%]; unwritten: 17 of 45 [38%]). Sixteen programs (16 of 45 [36%]) reported having both a formal and an unwritten maternity leave policy. Less than half of the programs have paternity leave policy (formal: 22 of 45 [49%]; unwritten: 19 of 45 [42%]), and fewer programs have adoption leave policy (formal: eight of 45 [18%]; unwritten: 11 of 45 [24%]). For programs that have formal or unwritten policies, most programs allow 4 to 6 weeks off (26 of 43 [60%]) with nearly half of programs allocating leave as paid time off (15 of 37 programs [41%]) and nearly half of programs requiring makeup time (17 of 37 [46%]). Many programs reported no utilization of leave by trainees (23 of 36 [61%]); many programs reported utilization by three or fewer residents (11 of 13 [85%]); and among residents who took leave, maternity was the most common reason (maternity: 22 of 36 [61%]; paternity: 11 of 36 [31%]; adoption: three of 36 [8%]). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the lack of uniformity among orthopaedic surgery residency and training programs regarding approach to maternity, paternity, and adoption leave. Discussion among program directors, perhaps facilitated by the Council of Orthopedic Residency Directors within the American Orthopaedic Association, to align the programs' policy in this arena may provide more transparent and uniform policy for trainees in orthopaedic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Adopción , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ortopedia , Permiso Parental/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Mujeres Trabajadoras/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Profesión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/educación , Ortopedia/educación , Formulación de Políticas , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación , Recursos Humanos
9.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 474(9): 1967-72, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27084717

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery now has the lowest percentage of women in residency programs of any surgical specialty. Understanding factors, particularly those related to the medical school experience, that contribute to the specialty's inability to draw from the best women students is crucial to improving diversity in the profession. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does required medical school exposure to orthopaedic surgery increase the proportion of women choosing the specialty? (2) Do negative perceptions deter women from choosing orthopaedic surgery? (3) What proportion of orthopaedic faculty members are women, and what proportion of residents are women? (4) To what degree has gender bias been identified in the application/interview process? METHODS: Two PubMed searches of articles between 2005 and 2015 were performed using a combination of medical subject headings. The first search combined "Orthopaedics" with "Physicians, women" and phrases "women surgeons" or "female surgeons" and the second combined "Orthopedics" with "Internship & Residency" or "exp Education, Medical" and "Sex Ratio" or "Sex Factors", resulting in 46 publications of which all abstracts were reviewed resulting in 11 manuscripts that were related to the research questions. The Google Scholar search of "women in orthopaedic surgery" identified one additional publication. These 12 manuscripts were read and bibliographies of each reviewed with two additional publications identified and included. RESULTS: Required exposure to orthopaedics was found to be positively associated with the number of women applicants to the field, whereas negative perceptions have been reported to deter women from choosing orthopaedic surgery. Orthopaedics has the lowest percentage of women faculty and women residents (14%) compared with other specialties; this suggests that same gender mentorship opportunities are limited. For women applying to orthopaedics, gender bias is most evident through illegal interview questions, in which women are asked such questions more often than men (such as family planning questions, asked to 61% of women versus 8% of men). CONCLUSIONS: Successful recruitment of women to orthopaedic surgery may be improved by early exposure and access to role models, both of which will help women students' perceptions of their role in field of orthopaedic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Internado y Residencia , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/psicología , Ortopedia/educación , Médicos Mujeres/psicología , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Mujeres Trabajadoras/psicología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Curriculum , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Mentores , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/educación , Percepción , Selección de Personal , Factores Sexuales , Sexismo , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación
10.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 474(9): 1979-85, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27113596

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women and minorities remain underrepresented in orthopaedic surgery. In an attempt to increase the diversity of those entering the physician workforce, Nth Dimensions implemented a targeted pipeline curriculum that includes the Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program. The program exposes medical students to the specialty of orthopaedic surgery and equips students to be competitive applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs. The effect of this program on women and underrepresented minority applicants to orthopaedic residencies is highlighted in this article. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) For women we asked: is completing the Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program associated with higher odds of applying to orthopaedic surgery residency? (2) For underrepresented minorities, is completing the Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program associated with higher odds of applying to orthopaedic residency? METHODS: Between 2005 and 2012, 118 students completed the Nth Dimensions/American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program. The summer internship consisted of an 8-week clinical and research program between the first and second years of medical school and included a series of musculoskeletal lectures, hands-on, practical workshops, presentation of a completed research project, ongoing mentoring, professional development, and counselling through each participant's subsequent years of medical school. In correlation with available national application data, residency application data were obtained for those Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program participants who applied to the match between 2011 through 2014. For these 4 cohort years, we evaluated whether this program was associated with increased odds of applying to orthopaedic surgery residency compared with national controls. For the same four cohorts, we evaluated whether underrepresented minority students who completed the program had increased odds of applying to an orthopaedic surgery residency compared with national controls. RESULTS: Fifty Orthopaedic Summer Internship scholars applied for an orthopaedic residency position. For women, completion of the Orthopaedic Summer Internship was associated with increased odds of applying to orthopaedic surgery residency (after summer internship: nine of 17 [35%]; national controls: 800 of 78,316 [1%]; odds ratio [OR], 51.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.1-122.0; p < 0.001). Similarly, for underrepresented minorities, Orthopaedic Summer Internship completion was also associated with increased odds of orthopaedic applications from 2011 to 2014 (after Orthopaedic Summer Internship: 15 of 48 [31%]; non-Orthopaedic Summer Internship applicants nationally: 782 of 25,676 [3%]; OR, 14.5 [7.3-27.5]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Completion of the Nth Dimensions Orthopaedic Summer Internship Program has a positive impact on increasing the odds of each student participant applying to an orthopaedic surgery residency program. This program may be a key factor in contributing to the pipeline of women and underrepresented minorities into orthopaedic surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ortopedia , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Mujeres Trabajadoras/estadística & datos numéricos , Curriculum , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/educación , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/tendencias , Ortopedia/educación , Ortopedia/tendencias , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Especialización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación , Recursos Humanos
11.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 474(9): 1962-6, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27245771

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery lags behind other surgical specialties in terms of gender diversity. The percentage of women entering orthopaedic residency persistently remains at 14% despite near equal ratios of women to men in medical school classes. This trend has been attributed to negative perceptions among women medical students of workplace culture and lifestyle in orthopaedics as well as lack of exposure, particularly during medical school when most women decide to enter the field. Since 2012, The Perry Initiative, a nonprofit organization that is focused on recruiting and retaining women in orthopaedics, had conducted extracurricular outreach programs for first- and second-year female medical students to provide exposure and mentoring opportunities specific to orthopaedics. This program, called the Medical Student Outreach Program (MSOP), is ongoing at medical centers nationwide and has reached over 300 medical students in its first 3 program years (2012-2014). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What percentage of MSOP participants eventually match into orthopaedic surgery residency? (2) Does MSOP impact participants' perceptions of the orthopaedics profession as well as intellectual interest in the field? METHODS: The percentage of program alumnae who matched into orthopaedics was determined by annual followup for our first two cohorts who graduated from medical school. All program participants completed a survey immediately before and after the program that assessed the impact of MSOP on the student's intention to pursue orthopaedics as well as perceptions of the field and intellectual interest in the discipline. RESULTS: The orthopaedic surgery match rate for program participants was 31% in our first graduating class (five of 16 participants in 2015) and 28% in our second class (20 of 72 participants in 2016). Pre/post program comparisons showed that the MSOP influenced students' perceptions of the orthopaedics profession as well as overall intellectual interest in the field. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that The Perry Initiative's MSOP positively influences women to choose orthopaedic surgery as a profession. The match rate for program alumnae is twice the percentage of females in current orthopaedic residency classes. Given these positive results, MSOP can serve as a model, both in its curricular content and logistic framework, for other diversity initiatives in the field.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ortopedia/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Mujeres Trabajadoras/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/educación , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/psicología , Percepción , Médicos Mujeres/psicología , Factores Sexuales , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación , Mujeres Trabajadoras/psicología
14.
Med Pr ; 66(5): 713-24, 2015.
Artículo en Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26647989

RESUMEN

The key activity in good practice of occupational medicine is to control, on a regular basis, the workers' health and how it is affected by the work environment and - consequently - to provide the employers and employees with advice regarding the organization, ergonomics, physiology and psychology of work. Occupational medicine practitioners should remember that certain duties are performed both at work and at home. This issue is particularly important in preventive healthcare of pregnant working women. Taking the above into consideration, we reviewed the literature with respect to nuisance and occupational risk factors, which might be associated with professional and household duties. The research indicates the need to reduce activities that require frequent bending or lifting, put a women at risk of falling or cause excess occupational stress for pregnant women. We would like to draw the doctors' attention to the possibility of exceeding a 4-hour limit of work at video display terminals and negative effects of low physical exercise and sitting for a long time both at work and at home. Since long working hours (over 40 h/week) affect the course of pregnancy negatively, total working time at work (including any additional jobs) and at home must be taken into account in the occupational risk assessment. To sum up, we emphasize that preventive healthcare of pregnant working women should mainly include education programmes. Women need to know how to perform their work safely and pay attention to the scope and frequency of household tasks (duties).


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Accidentes Domésticos/prevención & control , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador/organización & administración , Salud Laboral/educación , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Mujeres Embarazadas , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
16.
Matern Child Health J ; 18(7): 1675-82, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24414865

RESUMEN

Under Canada's Employment Insurance system, parents are entitled to receive up to 50 weeks of parental leave at 55 % of salary. Despite this national policy, women with higher education are more likely to delay childbearing. This analysis aimed to assess the association between workplace support, educational attainment and the timing of first births. Women who had recently given birth to their first live-born infant and lived in Alberta, Canada, were randomly selected to participate in a telephone survey. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between workplace support, educational attainment and timing of first pregnancy. Among 835 women with a planned pregnancy, 26 % agreed that support or lack of support for pregnant women at their workplace affected their decision about when to begin their family. After controlling for age and income, women who had completed a post-graduate degree were three times (OR 3.39, 95 % CI 1.69-6.81) more likely to indicate that support or lack of support for pregnant women in their workplace affected their childbearing decisions. In spite of national policies, and the potential risks associated with delayed childbearing, workplace support impacts timing of pregnancy, particularly for highly educated women.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Salud Laboral , Conducta Reproductiva , Apoyo Social , Mujeres Trabajadoras , Adulto , Alberta , Estudios Transversales , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Permiso Parental , Embarazo , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación , Mujeres Trabajadoras/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo
17.
J Vasc Surg ; 57(1): 262-7, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23141685

RESUMEN

Vascular surgery is a subspecialty that attracts future surgeons with challenging technical procedures and complex decision making. Despite its appeal, continued promotion of the field is necessary to recruit and retain the best and brightest candidates. Recruitment of medical students and residents may be limited by the lifestyle inherent to vascular surgery and the length of residency training. The young adults of the current applicant and resident pool differ from prior generations in their desire for hands-on mentoring, aspirations to affect change daily, a penchant for technology, and strong emphasis on work-life balance. Furthermore, the percentage of women pursuing careers in vascular surgery is not representative of the eligible workforce. Women are now the majority of graduates in all of higher education, and thus, vascular surgery may need to make a concerted effort to appeal to women in order to attract the most talented young professionals to the field. Recruiting strategies for both men and women of Generation Y should target a diverse group of potential candidates with an awareness of the unique characteristics and needs of this generation of rising surgeons.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Selección de Personal , Médicos Mujeres , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Mujeres Trabajadoras , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Selección de Personal/tendencias , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Factores Sexuales , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/educación , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación , Recursos Humanos , Carga de Trabajo
20.
Yale J Biol Med ; 84(3): 219-25, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21966039

RESUMEN

There is a notion that combining parenthood with a career in academic science is problematic, yet academic science careers can provide an outstanding career choice for professional parents because they offer extraordinary flexibility and stability. Much has been written about the paucity of women in tenure track scientific positions and the general disparity between men and women in all professions. However, the status quo is changing as more women fill the ranks of academia and male professors share childcare and household duties with spouses who hold professional positions. Although combining any career with parenthood can be challenging, parenthood should not be considered an obstacle to a successful scientific career.


Asunto(s)
Responsabilidad Parental/psicología , Padres/psicología , Investigación/educación , Trabajo/psicología , Selección de Profesión , Movilidad Laboral , Educación de Postgrado , Familia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mujeres Trabajadoras/educación , Mujeres Trabajadoras/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA