Risk factors for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs): a three-centric case-control study.

PURPOSE: Risk factors for sporadic GEP-NENs are still not well defined. To identify the main clinical risk factors represents the aim of this study performed by three Italian referral centers for NENs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study including 148 consecutive sporadic GEP-NENs and 210 age- and sex-matched controls. We collected data on clinical features, cancer family history and other potential risk factors. RESULTS: Mean age was 58.3 ± 15.8 years; 50% males, primary site was pancreas (50.7%), followed by ileum (22.3%). The 62.8% and 29.1% of cases were G1 and G2, respectively; the 40% had locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis. Independent risk factors for GEP-NENs were: family history of non-neuroendocrine GEP cancer (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.31-3.55, p = 0.003), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.39-4.51, p = 0.002) and obesity (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.18-2.99, p = 0.007). In the T2DM subjects, metformin use was a protective factor (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.93, p = 0.049). T2DM was also associated with a more advanced (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.05-5.46, p = 0.035) and progressive disease (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.08-5.34, p = 0.03). Stratifying cases by primary site, independent risk factors for pancreatic NENs were T2DM (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.28-5.15, p = 0.008) and obesity (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.11-3.52, p = 0.020), while for intestinal NENs family history of non-neuroendocrine GEP cancer (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.38-4.38, p = 0.003) and obesity (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.08-3.33, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: This study reinforces a role for family history of non-neuroendocrine GEP cancer, T2DM and obesity as independent risk factors for GEP-NENs and suggests a role of metformin as a protective factor in T2DM subjects. If confirmed, these findings could have a significant impact on prevention strategies for GEP-NENs.

Identification of a molecular signature of prognostic subtypes in diffuse-type gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although recent advances in high-throughput technology have provided many insights into gastric cancer (GC), few reliable biomarkers for diffuse-type GC have been identified. Here, we aim to identify a prognostic and predictive signature of diffuse-type GC heterogeneity. METHODS: We analyzed RNA-seq-based transcriptome data to identify a molecular signature in 150 gastric tissue samples including 107 diffuse-type GCs. The predictive value of the signature was verified using other diffuse-type GC samples in three independent cohorts (n = 466). Log-rank and Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the association between the signature and prognosis. The signature was also characterized by somatic variant analyses and tissue microarray analysis between diffuse-type GC subtypes. RESULTS: Transcriptomic profiling of RNA-seq data identified a signature which revealed distinct subtypes of diffuse-type GC: the intestinal-like (INT) and core diffuse-type (COD) subtypes. The signature showed high predictability and independent clinical utility in diffuse-type GC prognosis in other patient cohorts (HR 2.058, 95% CI 1.53-2.77, P = 1.76 × 10-6). Integrative mutational and gene expression analyses demonstrated that the COD subtype was responsive to chemotherapy, whereas the INT subtype was responsive to immunotherapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Tissue microarray analysis showed the practical utility of IGF1 and NXPE2 for predicting diffuse-type GC heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: We present a molecular signature that can identify diffuse-type GC patients who display different clinical behaviors as well as responses to chemotherapy or ICI treatment.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Heterogeneity Adds Uncertainty to the World Health Organization 2010 Classification: Real-World Data from the Spanish Tumor Registry (R-GETNE).

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are a complex family of tumors of widely variable clinical behavior. The World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 classification provided a valuable tool to stratify neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in three prognostic subgroups based on the proliferation index. However, substantial heterogeneity remains within these subgroups, and simplicity sometimes entails an ambiguous and imprecise prognostic stratification. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of histological differentiation within the WHO 2010 grade (G) 1/G2/G3 categories, and explore additional Ki-67 cutoff values in GEP-NENs. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: A total of 2,813 patients from the Spanish National Tumor Registry (RGETNE) were analyzed. Cases were classified by histological differentiation as NETs (neuroendocrine tumors [well differentiated]) or NECs (neuroendocrine carcinomas [poorly differentiated]), and by Ki-67 index as G1 (Ki-67 <2%), G2 (Ki-67 3%-20%), or G3 (Ki-67 >20%). Patients were stratified into five cohorts: NET-G1, NET-G2, NET-G3, NEC-G2, and NEC-G3. RESULTS: Five-year survival was 72%. Age, gender, tumor site, grade, differentiation, and stage were all independent prognostic factors for survival. Further subdivision of the WHO 2010 grading improved prognostic stratification, both within G2 (5-year survival: 81% [Ki-67 3%-5%], 72% [Ki-67 6%-10%], 52% [Ki-67 11%-20%]) and G3 NENs (5-year survival: 35% [Ki-67 21%-50%], 22% [Ki-67 51%-100%]). Five-year survival was significantly greater for NET-G2 versus NEC-G2 (75.5% vs. 58.2%) and NET-G3 versus NEC-G3 (43.7% vs. 25.4%). CONCLUSION: Substantial clinical heterogeneity is observed within G2 and G3 GEP-NENs. The WHO 2010 classification can be improved by including the additive effect of histological differentiation and the proliferation index. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are tumors of widely variable clinical behavior, roughly stratified by the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 classification into three subgroups based on proliferation index. Real-world data from 2,813 patients of the Spanish Registry RGETNE demonstrated substantial clinical heterogeneity within grade (G) 2 and G3 neuroendocrine neoplasms. Tumor morphology and further subdivision of grading substantially improves prognostic stratification of these patients and may help individualize therapy. This combined, additive effect shall be considered in future classifications of neuroendocrine tumors and incorporated for stratification purposes in clinical trials.

[Neuroendocrine Neoplasia within the German NET Registry]. / Neuroendokrine Neoplasien im deutschen NET-Register.

Neuroendocrine neoplasias (NEN) comprise a rare tumor entity with heterogeneous biology, prognosis and therapeutic options. Together with the recent publication of the first German guidelines on diagnostics and therapy of NEN, an analysis of the German NET-registry cohort of the German Society of Endocrinology (DGE) was performed. For this purpose, 2686 cases were extracted and their patient characteristics (e. g., age, sex, histopathological characterization, grading and staging) were displayed and outcomes were calculated. Additionally, the systemic treatment reality in the two largest subgroups, small intestinal and pancreatic NEN, was analyzed within metastatic patients.Distribution of primary tumor localization, histopathological classification, disease stage and overall survival was comparable with results from international registry studies. In concordance with current guidelines, somatostatin analogues (SSA) and peptide-receptor-radionuclide-therapy (PRRT) were the most common therapeutic modalities in small intestinal NEN. In pancreatic NEN, chemotherapy was used in first line as often as SSA. In second line, chemotherapy was used as often as PRRT. WHO-classification of 2010 and TNM staging proved to be of prognostic relevance.The current analysis of the German NET-registry characterizes a multicentric, interdisciplinary cohort of NEN patients throughout Germany and it describes the applied systemic treatment modalities and overall outcome as well as the prognostic value of the WHO classification of 2010 and TNM staging.

Intestinal T-cell and NK/T-cell lymphomas: A clinicopathological study of 27 Chinese patients.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal T-cell and NK/T- cell lymphomas are rare and aggressive. The diagnosis is quite difficult, especial in biopsy specimens. This study investigates the clinicopathological features of intestinal T-cell and NK/T-cell lymphomas to aid their differential diagnosis. METHODS: Clinical data of 27 cases were collected. Including extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTCL-N), monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma (MEITL), peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS), anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, ALK+ (ALCL, ALK+) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL). The histologic features, immunohistochemical findings, T-cell receptor gene rearrangement results, and follow-up data were analyzed, with review of literature. RESULTS: The age of the patients (N = 27) was 15-85 years (mean, 47.5 years), and male:female ratio, 3.5:1. Abdominal pain and B symptoms were the most common symptoms. Although 85.2% of the patients were in clinical stage I-II, 59.3% died within 1 year. MEITL showed certain distinctive clinic opathological features from ENKTCL-N. Compared to lesions at other sites, there were no differences in the morphological features, immunophenotype and TCR gene rearrangement of intestinal ENKTCL-N, PTCL, NOS, ALCL, ALK+ and AITL. CONCLUSION: Intestinal T-cell and NK/T-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of lymphomas. They could be classified to 5 histological subtypes in our study. ENKTCL-N and MEITL formed the majority of the tumor types. Each subtype has distinctive pathological features, but most of them have diamal prognosis.

Recommended parameters for pathology reporting of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs).

No abstract available.

Subgroup analysis of patients with G2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are malignancies with an increasing incidence rate. NETs are graded or classified by the expression level of Ki67, a proliferation marker in Grade 1 and 2 tumors. Out of 120 patients who visited our hospital between 2003 and 2012, 40 were classified as G2 NET. This study was mainly designed to investigate a new threshold for optimising the Ki67 system. Patients were subdivided into two new groups according to Ki67 (group 1 = 3-9%, group 2 = 10-20%). Twenty-five patients were allocated to group 1 and 15 to group 2. The primary tumor originated in 46% from the foregut and 68% NET were functionally active. Patients were treated in 88 versus 60% by surgery, 48 versus 80% by somatostatin analogs, 0 versus 20% by chemotherapy, 2,5 versus 0% by Everolimus and 32 versus 47% underwent peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Group 1 patients showed a significantly (p = 0.01) better survival compared with group 2 and also a significant difference of Chromogranin A (p = 0.03) and alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.01). In addition, all patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase showed a significantly (p = 0.03) shorter survival. Prognostic relevance of G2 NETs may be improved by using a new boundary. Patients with Ki67 of 3-9% showed a better response to current treatment methods and significantly longer survival compared to group 2. Thus, our data clearly show that patients with higher G2 proliferation index should be treated differently. Finally, LDH has been found to be a new prognostic factor in patients with G2 NET.

Digestive neuroendocrine tumors: reclassifying of 26 cases according to 2010 who classification.

BACKGROUND: The classification of digestive neuroendocrine tumors is difficult due to their heterogeneity and rareness. AIMS: Reclassify the digestive neuroendocrine tumors according  to  the  WHO-2010 classification .  Methods: A retrospective study included   26 patients having digestive neuroendocrine     tumors ,  is achieved  in our  Pathology  Laboratory  of the Military Hospital of  Tunis between 2000 and 2013. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 49.64 years. The Sex ratio was  1.36. It was 6 gastric tumors, 5 small intestine tumors , 5 pancreatic tumors, 5  appendix tumors , one hypatic tumor, one  gall bladder  tumor , one rectal tumor and one colon tumor. According to the WHO -2000 classification, tumors are categorised into 11 well differentiated  endocrine tumors, 13 well differentiated  endocrine carcinoma  and 2 poorly differentiated carcinoma . According to the WHO -2010 classification, tumors were re-evaluated as  16 neuroendocrine tumors grade 1, 6 neuroendocrine tumors grade 2 and 4 neuroendocrine carcinoma . CONCLUSION: There was a concordance between the two classifications in 93% of cases. The WHO -2010 classification may allow a  better classification for the digestive neuroendocrine tumors, however there are some histological categories that remained difficult to classify.

Comparison of World Health Organization 2000/2004 and World Health Organization 2010 classifications for gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) were divided into 4 groups based on tumor diameter and stage in World Health Organization (WHO) 2000/2004 classification as well-differentiated endocrine tumor benign (WDETB), well-differentiated endocrine tumor with uncertain behavior (WDETUB), well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma (WDEC), and poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma (PDEC). World Health Organization 2000/2004 was not widely accepted because of stage-related classification and the category of "uncertain behavior." The European NET Society proposed a grading classification and site-specific staging system in 2010. Gastroenteropancreatic NETs were divided into 3 groups as NET grade 1 (G1), NET grade 2 (G2), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) grade 3 (G3) based on mitoses and the Ki-67 index. We evaluated 63 GEPNET cases according to both classifications. We compared two classifications and the tumor groups in terms of prognostic parameters (diameter, mitosis, Ki-67 index, angioinvasion, perineural invasion, necrosis, and metastasis) and pathologic stage. All 14 cases diagnosed as PDEC were included in the NEC G3 according to WHO 2010. Seventeen cases were diagnosed as WDETB, 9 as WDETUB, and 23 as WDEC. There was statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of all prognostic parameters except for necrosis, mitosis, Ki-67 index, and grade. All WDETB cases, 89% of WDETUBs, and 87% of WDECs were included in the NET G1. There were 45 cases evaluated as NET G1 and 4 cases as NET G2 according to WHO 2010. Metastasis and perineural invasion were more common in NET G2, no significant differences in other parameters. In conclusion, WHO 2010 is easier to use, whereas WHO 2000/2004 shows higher correlation with prognosis. However, it includes benign and uncertain behavior categories, although small tumors with low proliferative activity can also cause metastases. All GEPNETs should be considered potentially malignant.

Intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an evaluation of different staging systems.

The gastrointestinal tract is the most common primary extranodal site for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there is no consensus on the most appropriate staging system for intestinal DLBCL. We evaluated the utility of the modified Ann Arbor system, the Lugano system, and the Paris staging system (a modification of the Tumor, Node, Metastases [TNM] staging for epithelial tumors) in 66 cases of resected intestinal DLBCL. The cases were treated with surgery, plus either cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP) chemotherapy alone (n=26) or with the addition of rituximab immunotherapy (n=40). Median follow-up time was 40.4 months (range, 2.1-171.6 months). Fifty-six patients (84.8%) achieved complete remission. The overall 5-yr survival rate was 86.4% (57/66). Of the stage categories defined for each staging system, only the T stage of the Paris classification showed prognostic significance for overall survival by univariate analysis. However, none of the stage parameters was significantly correlated with patient survival on multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the results suggest that the T stage of the Paris classification system may be a prognostic indicator in intestinal DLBCL. The results also imply that in surgically resected intestinal DLBCL, the addition of rituximab to the CHOP regimen does not confer significant survival advantage.

Management of advanced high grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs): comprehensive review of the current literature.

The classification and management of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) arising in the tubular gastrointestinal (GI) tract and pancreas have significantly evolved over the last decades. In the latest WHO classification published in 2022, NENs are separated regardless of their primary origin into two main groups: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The substantial changes in the grading system changed the definition of grade 3 to include high-grade well-differentiated NETs (G3-NETs), and poorly differentiated NECs (-NECs). Although these two subgroups are considered high grades with Ki-67 >20%, they have different genomic profiles, prognosis, and clinical behavior, which critically influence their treatment strategies. The available clinical trial data to guide therapy of these high-grade subgroups are extremely limited, which impacts their management. In this review, we will summarize the current advances in the multidisciplinary approach for the management of high-grade gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEP-NENs) including G3-NETs and NECs.

Re-evaluation of cases with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors between 2004 and 2012 according to the 2010 criteria.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We re-evaluated the clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical features of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) diagnosed in our pathology laboratory between 2004 and 2012 and re-classified them according to the WHO-2000 and WHO-2010 criteria. METHODOLOGY: The study included NET samples of 106 patients having gastroenteropancreatic and hepatobiliary tumors. The histopathological findings were re-assessed. The cases were re-appraised based on the WHO-2000 and WHO-2010 criteria. The association between survival and Ki-67 index was analysed. RESULTS: The most frequent localization was the stomach. The average tumor size was 3.0±4.1 cm. Differentiation was poor in 17 cases (16.0%). Lymphovascular invasion was detected in 16.1% (n = 17) and necrosis was identified in 15.1% (n = 16). The average number of Ki-67 was 9.1±19.9. Ki-67 measurements were significantly higher in patients who died compared to those who survived (p <0.01). In ROC analysis, the cut-off point for Ki-67 was 5. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is a single-center study comprising patients from Turkey for a period of 8 years. We found that the most frequent localization is the stomach. This ratio is associated with common use of endoscopy in our center. The specimens were re-evaluated according to the WHO-2000 and WHO-2010 classification systems the data and terminology have been updated.

Multicenter retrospective analysis of 581 patients with primary intestinal non-hodgkin lymphoma from the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL).

BACKGROUND: Primary intestinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a heterogeneous disease with regard to anatomic and histologic distribution. Thus, analyses focusing on primary intestinal NHL with large number of patients are warranted. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 581 patients from 16 hospitals in Korea for primary intestinal NHL in this retrospective analysis. We compared clinical features and treatment outcomes according to the anatomic site of involvement and histologic subtypes. RESULTS: B-cell lymphoma (n = 504, 86.7%) was more frequent than T-cell lymphoma (n = 77, 13.3%). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common subtype (n = 386, 66.4%), and extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) was the second most common subtype (n = 61, 10.5%). B-cell lymphoma mainly presented as localized disease (Lugano stage I/II) while T-cell lymphomas involved multiple intestinal sites. Thus, T-cell lymphoma had more unfavourable characteristics such as advanced stage at diagnosis, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly lower than B-cell lymphoma (28% versus 71%, P < 0.001). B symptoms were relatively uncommon (20.7%), and bone marrow invasion was a rare event (7.4%). The ileocecal region was the most commonly involved site (39.8%), followed by the small (27.9%) and large intestines (21.5%). Patients underwent surgery showed better OS than patients did not (5-year OS rate 77% versus 57%, P < 0.001). However, this beneficial effect of surgery was only statistically significant in patients with B-cell lymphomas (P < 0.001) not in T-cell lymphomas (P = 0.460). The comparison of survival based on the anatomic site of involvement showed that ileocecal regions had a better 5-year overall survival rate (72%) than other sites in consistent with that ileocecal region had higher proportion of patients with DLBCL who underwent surgery. Age > 60 years, performance status ≥ 2, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, Lugano stage IV, presence of B symptoms, and T-cell phenotype were independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients with ileocecal region involvement was better than that of patients with involvement at other sites, which might be related to histologic distribution, the proportion of tumor stage, and need for surgical resection.

[Primary gastrointestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an immunohistochemical and prognostic study of 90 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To study the immunophenotype and prognostic significance of primary gastrointestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, with reference to Hans, Choi and Tally algorithms. METHODS: The clinicopathologic features and follow-up data in 90 cases of primary gastrointestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test and Cox regression model. Immunohistochemistry was carried out using EliVision and EnVision methods for CD20, CD3ε, CD10, bcl-6, MUM-1, CD5, bcl-2, GCET1, FOXP1, LMO2, BLIMP1 and Ki-67. RESULTS: The age of patients ranged from 27 to 83 years (mean = 58 years). The male-to-female ratio was 1.31:1. Amongst the 90 cases studied, 64.4% (58/90) involved the stomach and 35.6% (32/90) involved the intestine. The immunohistochemical findings were as follows: 100% positivity for CD20, 0% for CD3ε and CD5, 17.8% (16/90) for CD10, 75.6% (68/90) for bcl-6, 52.2% (47/90) for MUM-1 (cut off was 30%), 43.3% (39/90) for MUM-1 (cut off was 80%), 50.0% (45/90) for GCET1, 45.6% (41/90) for FOXP1, 23.3% (21/90) for LMO2, 42.2% (38/90) for bcl-2 and 8.9% (8/90) for BLIMP1. The Ki-67 index ranged from 20% to 95% (median = 80%). According to Hans algorithm, 51.1% of the cases belonged to germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype and 48.9% belonged to non-GCB subtype. In contrast, Choi algorithm classified 55.6% cases as GCB subtype and 44.4% as activated B-cell (ABC) subtype. According to Tally algorithm, 34.4% were of GCB subtype and 65.6% of non-GCB subtype. Most of the patients (67.8%, 61/90) received chemotherapy and 68.9% (62/90) underwent surgical resection. The overall 2, 3 and 5-year survival rates were 58.5%, 52.8% and 49.8%, respectively. The overall 2, 3 and 5-year survival rates in the CHOP therapy group were 68.5%, 61.2% and 52.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in ratio between the GCB and non-GCB/ABC subtypes by Hans and Choi algorithms. The non-GCB subtype seems to be more prevalent according to Tally algorithm. Although there is no significant difference in survival between GCB and non-GCB/ABC subtypes by the 3 algorithms, GCB subtype tends to show a better survival. In univariate analysis, LDH level, international prognostic index, chemotherapy, surgical resection, B symptoms, number of involved sites and clinical stage are found to have prognostic significance. In multivariate analysis, Choi algorithm, Tally algorithm, chemotherapy, surgical resection, LDH level and clinical stage are independent prognostic factors.

[Small intestinal tumors as a cause of chronic iron deficiency anemia].

A brief update literature review on different methods of diagnosis of small intestinal tumors indicates angiography, videointestinoscopy and positron-emission tomography as most sensitive methods in diagnosis of intestinal tumors. A case of a small intestinal tumor is reported (a male of 46 years of age with chronic iron deficiency anemia) which was diagnosed with videointestinal camera and was confirmed histologically as adenocarcinoma). The patient was successfully operated and is now on chemotherapy.

Extensive molecular reclassification: new perspectives in small bowel adenocarcinoma?

SBA classification is still based on the location of the primary tumor, without genetic information. in the current study, an extensive genetic profile of SBA, was performed in order to identify and quantify targetable alterations for a future precision medicine in SBA. Clinical-pathological information for 24 patients affected by SBA were retrospectively reviewed. Whole genome analysis of the primary tumors was performed by the FOUNDATION Cdx technology. We carried out a functional enrichment analysis of the mutated genes with BioPlanet. Integrative clustering analysis revealed three distinct subtypes characterized by different genomic alterations. Cluster 1exhibited significant correlations with MSI status, high TMB, celiac disease and Jejunual site.We defined cluster 1 as "immunological subtype" (29.2% of patients). Driver mutations in this subtype suggest that 100% of patients may benefit from immunotherapy. Enrichment analysis of cluster 2 highlighted that the main affected pathway was that of homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange (16.7% of patients). We defined this cluster as "DNA Damage Repair (DDR) like". On the basis of these driver molecular alterations, 100% of patients could benefit from PARPi. Finally, Cluster 3 had no significant correlations with clinical-pathological characteristics (54.1% of patients). Enrichment analysis revealed that this cluster has remarkable similarities with CRA genomic profile, so we defined it as "Colon-like". SBA is a genetically distinct tumor entity and deep mutation heterogeneity indicates that different driver genes play a role in the biology of these tumors. The identification of clusters based on genetic profile suggest the possibility to go beyond chemotherapy in several patients.

Time trends in incidence and survival of small intestinal cancer in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Small intestinal cancer is less common than some other gastrointestinal malignancies. Tumours of different histological types and anatomical sites of origin have therefore often been described together. The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology for each of the four main subtypes: duodenal adenocarcinoma (D-AC), duodenal neuroendocrine tumour (D-NET), jejunoileal adenocarcinoma (J/I-AC), and jejunoileal neuroendocrine tumour (J/I-NET). METHODS: All patients with small intestinal cancer diagnosed between 1960 and 2015 were identified from the Swedish Cancer Register. The age-adjusted incidence rate with incidence rate ratios, as well as overall (OS) and net (NS) survival, were determined and temporal trends were analysed. RESULTS: The incidence rate was highest for J/I-NET, with 9.98 clinical diagnoses per million in 2010-2015. Clinical diagnosis of D-AC increased more than 10-fold and surpassed J/I-AC as the second most common subtype. D-NET was by far the least common subtype. Diagnosis at autopsy became less common over time, whereas clinical diagnoses increased significantly for all four subtypes. All subtypes except J/I-AC affected men more often than women. The age distribution was similar between subtypes, although patients with adenocarcinomas were slightly older. Survival was generally much better for patients with NET than for those with adenocarcinoma. Both OS and NS showed a negative association with advancing age. Survival improved only for J/I-NET from a 5-year NS of 0.69 in the 1960s to 0.81 in 2010-2015. CONCLUSION: The incidence of small intestinal cancer is increasing, particularly for D-AC and in the elderly. Survival of patients with small intestinal cancer has improved only for J/I-NET over the last decades.

High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Improved Prognostic Stratification With the New World Health Organization 2019 Classification: A Validation Study From a Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: There is a pressing need to develop clinical management pathways for grade 3 (G3) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NEN). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on patients with metastatic G3 GEP NEN. The relationship between baseline characteristics and progression-free survival and overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We included 142 patients (74 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors [WDNETs], 68 poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas [PDNECs]). Patients with WDNET had prolonged survival compared with PDNEC (median, 24 vs 15 months, P = 0.0001), which persisted in both pancreatic and nonpancreatic cohorts. Well-differentiated morphology, Ki-67 <50% and positive somatostatin receptor imaging were independently associated with prolonged survival. Of the subgroup treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, response rates were favorable (partial response, 47%; stable disease, 30%); there was no significant difference in response rates nor progression-free survival between WDNET and PDNEC despite significantly prolonged overall survival in the WDNET cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our study corroborates the knowledge of 2 prognostically distinct subgroups within the World Health Organization 2019 G3 GEP NEN population, observed in both pancreatic and nonpancreatic gastrointestinal cohorts. Definitive management pathways are needed to reflect the differences between G3 WDNET and PDNEC.

[The current TNM system for gastrointestinal tumors part I]. / Aktuelles TNM-System der gastrointestinalen Tumoren Teil I.

The present review describes the changes in the new 7th edition of the TNM system for tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The description of esophageal tumor localization has been simplified and this new classification now includes tumors of the esophagogastric junction as well as the proximal 5 cm of the stomach. The regional lymph nodes of the esophagus now include celiac lymph nodes, a change which is important for therapeutic decision making. The categories T1 and T4 have been further subclassified. The N categorization now considers not only the presence of metastases but also the number of lymph node metastases within three categories. The T and N categories of stomach tumours (as well as the stage groups) have been modified to ensure a significantly better correlation to the prognosis. The number of lymph nodes has been adapted to 16 to classify pN0. Only slight modifications have been introduced in tumors of the small bowel.

[Tubular adenoma of the stomach with special reference to the Japanese criteria and pyloric gland adenoma]. / Das tubuläre Magenadenom. Mit Darstellung der Japanischen Kriterien unter Berücksichtigung des "pyloric gland adenoma"

The term gastric adenoma usually refers to a flat adenoma of the intestinal type. Adenomas of the gastric type, so-called pyloric gland adenomas (PGA), which was first characterized by German and Japanese pathologists in 1990, have been regarded as exceptional until recently. In 2003, we first reported systematic clinical pathological analyses of PGA, demonstrating its unstable and precancerous nature. American gastrointestinal pathologists have finally recognized this disease entity in 2009. In this article we introduce the Japanese criteria of the gastric adenoma and review and discuss the clinical pathological and molecular aspects of PGAs.