RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Respirable crystalline silica is a well-known cause of silicosis but may also be associated with other types of interstitial lung disease. We examined the associations between occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and the risk of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, pulmonary sarcoidosis and silicosis. METHODS: The total Danish working population was followed 1977-2015. Annual individual exposure to respirable crystalline silica was estimated using a quantitative job exposure matrix. Cases were identified in the Danish National Patient Register. We conducted adjusted analyses of exposure-response relations between cumulative silica exposure and other exposure metrics and idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, pulmonary sarcoidosis and silicosis. RESULTS: Mean cumulative exposure was 125 µg/m3-years among exposed workers. We observed increasing incidence rate ratios with increasing cumulative silica exposure for idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, pulmonary sarcoidosis and silicosis. For idiopathic interstitial pneumonias and pulmonary sarcoidosis, trends per 50 µg/m3-years were 1.03 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.03) and 1.06 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.07), respectively. For silicosis, we observed the well-known exposure-response relation with a trend per 50 µg/m3-years of 1.20 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.23). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that silica inhalation may be related to pulmonary sarcoidosis and idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, though these findings may to some extent be explained by diagnostic misclassification. The observed exposure-response relations for silicosis at lower cumulative exposure levels than previously reported need to be corroborated in analyses that address the limitations of this study.
Asunto(s)
Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Sarcoidosis Pulmonar , Dióxido de Silicio , Silicosis , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Sarcoidosis Pulmonar/epidemiología , Sarcoidosis Pulmonar/etiología , Dióxido de Silicio/efectos adversos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Silicosis/epidemiología , Silicosis/etiología , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas/epidemiología , Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Incidencia , AncianoRESUMEN
Patients with idiopathic fibrosing interstitial pneumonias (f-IIPs) mainly suffer from dyspnea. Refractory dyspnea, defined as persistent dyspnea despite optimal treatment, could be the signal to prescribe dyspnea relievers. We aimed to examine the prevalence and characteristics of refractory dyspnea in consecutive patients with f-IIPs. Refractory dyspnea was defined by an mMRC≥3 and also by a VAS dyspnea score≥2 at rest. The sensory and affective characteristics of refractory dyspnea (mMRC≥3) and associated quality of life (QoL) anxiety and depression were compared with non-refractory dyspnea (mMRC1-2) using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP), King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (KBILD) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADs). We included 40 patients (24 men), aged 72 [68-79], FVC of 71 % [59-86] and DLCO 47 % [40-49]. Refractory dyspnea, was found in 38 % (95%CI:23-54) when defined by mMRC≥3 and in 67 % (95%CI:50-81) using a resting VAS dyspnea score ≥2. The agreement between the two definitions was low. Patients with refractory dyspnea (mMRC≥3) were more often women (60 % vs.28 %, p = 0.046), had a lower DLCO (24 % [22-43] vs.47 % [43-51], p = 0.014) and more frequently used oxygen (60 % vs.12 %, p = 0.003); they experience more intense air hunger (5/10 [3-6] vs.2/10 [0-5], p = 0.018)). No significant differences were observed in VAS, MDP, KBILD, or HADs scores between refractory and non-refractory dyspnea patients. Our results indicate a significant frequency of refractory dyspnea in patients with f-IIPs and an association with air hunger but no impact on the affective dimension of dyspnea, anxiety, depression and QoL, suggesting that the mMRC score might not accurately identify patients distressed by their breathlessness.
Asunto(s)
Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Calidad de Vida , Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas/complicaciones , Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/epidemiología , Disnea/diagnóstico , Disnea/epidemiología , Disnea/etiologíaRESUMEN
Las neumonías intersticiales idiopáticas (NII) constituyen un reto diagnóstico para neumólogos, radiólogos y patólogos, comenzando por su clasificación, objeto de controversia en la actualidad. El estudio funcional respiratorio supone un elemento básico para establecer el diagnóstico, orientar en el pronóstico, controlar la evolución y monitorizar la respuesta al tratamiento. La exploración radiológica imprescindible para el diagnóstico de las NII es la tomografía computarizada de alta resolución (TCAR), que además puede ofrecer datos de la actividad y del pronóstico de la enfermedad (AU)
Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) are a diagnostic challenge for pneumologists, radiologists and pathologists alike. The classification of IPPs is currently controversial. Pulmonary function testing is an essential component in order to establish a diagnosis and is required to guide prognosis and follow-up and monitor treatment outcome. High-resolution computed tomography is also essential for the diagnosis of IPPs and may also provide data on disease activity and prognosis (AU)