Quantification of systemic o-toluidine after intrathecal administration of hyperbaric prilocaine in humans: a prospective cohort study.

Hyperbaric 2% prilocaine is increasingly used for spinal anesthesia. It is the only local anesthetic metabolized to o-toluidine, a human bladder carcinogen. Increase of o-toluidine hemoglobin adducts, a marker of o-toluidine ability to modify the DNA structure, was described following subcutaneous injection. In this prospective cohort study we aimed to assess and quantify o-toluidine hemoglobin adducts and urinary o-toluidine after a single intrathecal dose of hyperbaric prilocaine.10 patients undergoing surgery received 50 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine intrathecally. Blood and urine samples were collected before injection and up to 24 h later (Hospital Braine l'Alleud-Waterloo, Braine l'Alleud, Belgium). Urinary o-toluidine and o-toluidine hemoglobin adducts were measured by tandem mass-spectrometry after gas-chromatographic separation (Institute of the Ruhr-Universität, Bochum Germany). The trial was registered to ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03642301; 22-08-2018)Intrathecal administration of 50 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine leads to a significant increase of o-toluidine hemoglobin adducts (0.1 ± 0.02-11.9 ± 1.9 ng/g Hb after 24 h, p = 0.001). Peak of urinary o-toluidine was observed after 8 h (0.1 ± 0.1-460.5 ± 352.8 µg/L, p = 0.001) and declined to 98 ± 66.8 µg/L after 24 h (mean ± SD)Single intrathecal administration of hyperbaric prilocaine leads to a systemic burden with o-toluidine and o-toluidine hemoglobin adducts. O-toluidine-induced modifications of DNA should be examined and intrathecal hyperbaric prilocaine should not be proposed to patients chronically exposed to o-toluidine.Clinical trial number and registry URL NCT03642301.

Blood concentration of prilocaine and lidocaine after the use of topical anesthesia (Oraqix® ) in lacerated wounds.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Soft tissue injuries have been reported as being sutured using only topical anesthesia applied in the laceration wound. The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of components of Oraqix® (2.5% prilocaine and 2.5% lidocaine) when applied in a laceration as compared to intact skin application in the mouse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 BALB/c male mice were used in this study. The mice were divided into three groups: group A: shaved and laceration group (80 mice); B: shaved and intact skin group (80 mice); and C: control group (shaved, no treatment; 40 mice) which underwent the same procedures but without application of Oraqix® . Blood samples were collected over 90 min. Plasma sample analysis employing liquid chromatography coupled with the tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method was used to determine plasma concentrations of lidocaine and prilocaine. Pharmacokinetic analysis of mouse plasma concentrations was carried out by standard non-compartmental methods. RESULTS: Absorption of both lidocaine and prilocaine was rapid. Cmax and AUC values of lidocaine were significantly increased by fourfold and twofold, respectively, in lacerated mouse skin compared to intact skin. Similarly, prilocaine's Cmax and AUC values were also increased by 2.5-fold and fourfold, respectively, in lacerated skin compared to intact skin. CONCLUSION: When Oraqix® was applied directly into the skin laceration, the plasma concentration of lidocaine and prilocaine was significantly increased as compared to when applied on intact skin. The present study, albeit in mice, indicates that the plasma levels of lidocaine and prilocaine can reach very high levels when the thermosetting gel Oraqix® is placed directly in wounds.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of a nanotechnological topical formulation of lidocaine/prilocaine (nanorap) in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Nanorap is a new nanotechnological formulation for topical anesthesia composed of lidocaine (2.5%) and prilocaine (2.5%). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of Nanorap. For the determination of lidocaine and prilocaine in human plasma, a new method using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was developed. Nanorap pharmacodynamic (PD) and its physical proprieties were also evaluated. METHODS: Nanorap was administered by topical application of 2 g to healthy volunteers, and blood samples were collected for the pharmacokinetics analysis. The drugs were extracted from plasma by liquid-liquid extraction with ether/hexane (80/20, vol/vol). The chromatography separation was performed on a Genesis C18 analytical column 4 µm (100 × 2.1 mm i.d.) with a mobile phase of methanol/acetonitrile/water (40/30/30, for lidocaine, and 50/30/20, for prilocaine, vol/vol/vol) + 2 mM of ammonium acetate and ropivacaine as internal standard. The drugs were quantified using a mass spectrometer with an electrospray source in the electrospray ionization positive mode configured for multiple reaction monitoring. The PD of Nanorap was evaluated with the use of a visual analog scale. Nanorap was characterized by cryofracture. RESULTS: The chromatography run-time was 5.5 minutes for lidocaine and 3.3 minutes for prilocaine, and the lower limit of quantification was 0.05 ng/mL for both drugs. Mean Cmax was 6.62 and 1.72 ng/mL for lidocaine and prilocaine, respectively. Median Tmax was 6.5 hours for both drugs. Nanocapsules had a mean size of 88 nm and mean drug association of 92.5% and 89% for lidocaine and prilocaine, respectively. The PD study showed that Nanorap has a sufficient analgesic effect (>30% reduction in pain) after 10 minutes of application. CONCLUSIONS: A new simple, selective, and sensitive method for determination of lidocaine and prilocaine in human plasma was developed. Nanorap generated safe plasma levels of the drugs and satisfactory analgesic effect.

Biocompatible lidocaine and prilocaine loaded-nanoemulsion system for enhanced percutaneous absorption: QbD-based optimisation, dermatokinetics and in vivo evaluation.

Barrier properties of the skin and physicochemical properties of the drugs are the main hiccups in delivering local anaesthetic molecules topically. The present work endeavours for systematic optimisation and evaluation of nanoemulsions (NEs) of local anaesthetic drugs, lidocaine and prilocaine, employing the systematic approach of Quality by Design. A 3(3) Box-Behnken design was employed for systematic optimisation of the factors obtained from screening studies employing Plackett-Burman design and risk assessment studies. The superior permeation rates, and higher concentrations of the drugs in skin layers from the optimised NE carriers, were achieved in permeation and dermatokinetic studies, when compared to marketed cream. Furthermore, rapid onset of action was demonstrated by the NE system in rabbit eye corneal reflex model and biocompatibility was confirmed from the absence of any marked skin change(s) in the normal skin histology. The developed NE systems demonstrated it as a promising carrier for topical delivery of lidocaine and prilocaine.

The use of skin needling for the delivery of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics.

AIM: The use of skin needling is believed to aid the transdermal delivery of drugs, even if it is mostly used for skin collagen induction. The aim of this paper was to use skin needling, combined with a local anesthetic EMLA (eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine), as a way to enhance transdermal drug penetration and optimize the analgesic effects of common local anesthesia. METHODS: We recruited 15 patients. For each patient of our study we defined a skin area of 3 cm2 from two forearms: on one side, we used skin needling first and immediately thereafter applied the EMLA in occlusion for 60 minutes; on the other one, we only applied EMLA in occlusion for 60 minutes. Then, pain was induced in each patient's forearm by introducing a 27 G needle into the skin 4 mm deep three times. Lastly, pain sensation measures were registered and a middle value was calculated. RESULTS: When skin needling is used in conjunction with EMLA applied in occlusion for 60 minutes on skin forearms, the level of pain sensation registered was significantly reduced on a Visual Analogue Scale compared to the application of EMLA alone. CONCLUSION: The use of skin needling can improve the transdermal delivery of an emulsion-like eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) and can introduce the use of this method for delivering topical molecules in dermatology.

Cutaneous pharmacokinetics-based bioequivalence: A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion verification study using lidocaine and prilocaine combination topical products.

BACKGROUND: Using accurate, sensitive, reproducible and efficient in vivo cutaneous pharmacokinetics (PK)-based bioequivalence (BE) approaches can promote the development of topical generic drug products. A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion (dOFM) study has previously demonstrated the BE of topical drug products containing a hydrophilic drug. However, the utility of dOFM to evaluate the topical BE of drug products containing moderately lipophilic drugs, more representative of most topical drugs, has not yet been established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of a clinical dOFM study to assess BE of topical products containing two moderately lipophilic drugs that have only minor differences in chemical and physical properties. METHODS: The study included 20 healthy subjects. Four application sites on each thigh were treated with fixed dose lidocaine/prilocaine combination products, and dermal drug concentrations were monitored with two dOFM probes per application site for 12 h. A reference cream was compared to itself and to an approved generic cream (both serving as positive controls for BE), and to a gel (negative control). BE was established based on AUC0to12h and Cmax using the scaled-average-BE approach. Systemic exposure of both drugs was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: BE was successfully demonstrated for the positive controls, and not for the negative control, for both drugs. The systemic exposure of both drugs was negligible. CONCLUSIONS: dOFM accurately demonstrated BE between bioequivalent topical creams, sensitively discriminated between different formulations and differentiated the cutaneous PK of both study drugs, even though they differ only slightly in chemical and physical properties. These results support the utility of dOFM as a cutaneous PK-based BE approach for topical lipophilic drugs, including lidocaine and prilocaine.

EMLA cream in burns: A systematic review of safety, analgesic efficacy, and effects on burn pathophysiology.

AIM: Management of procedural pain in burn care is challenging. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream 5%, eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA®), is a widely used, effective local anesthetic cream approved for normal intact skin, genital mucosa for superficial surgical procedures, and debridement of chronic leg ulcers. This comprehensive review aimed to determine the safety, analgesic efficacy, and effects of EMLA on burn pathophysiology to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for introducing the topical anesthetic into burn care. METHODS: The PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducting a systematic PubMed search to include all relevant preclinical and clinical studies, according to pre-specified eligibility criteria. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in a qualitative synthesis, among which nine were human and six were animal studies. To date, safety and pharmacokinetic data on EMLA application in burns have been limited. Nevertheless, human studies indicated that EMLA is safe and provides adequate procedural-pain relief in adults when applied to smaller burns. Caution should be exercised when using EMLA in younger children, as systemic toxicity, pertaining to prilocaine-induced methemoglobinemia, has been reported owing to overdosing (high doses applied over large burn areas). Furthermore, animal studies demonstrate the potential beneficial effects of EMLA on burn pathophysiology such as anti-inflammatory, decreased capillary permeability to plasma proteins and edema formation, and improved tissue perfusion, which are factors that may impact burn wound progression. CONCLUSION: Current data on EMLA use in the management of procedural pain in small burns are sparse but suggest that EMLA is safe and effective in adults. Further clinical pharmacokinetic studies are warranted, especially for application on larger burn areas.

Topical anesthetics for cosmetic dermatologic procedures.

AIM: The aim of our study is to value the vasoconstrictor effect of two most utilized topical anesthetics, the first one containing a mixture 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine and the second one containing 4% liposomal lidocaine, in the treatment of vascular lesion during cosmetic dermatologic procedures. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were enrolled in our department. They showed telangiectasias, measuring between 0.5 and 1 millimeter in diameter on their face and limbs. Five volunteers were randomized to receive topical 4% liposomal lidocaine and five to receive 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine. In all treated areas, the 4% liposomal lidocaine was left for at least 30 minutes and the 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine was left for at least 60 minutes. RESULTS: Clinically, the volunteers who received the 4% liposomal lidocaine showed minimal vasoconstrictor difference between before and after treatment; while the others who received the 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine showed a major vasoconstrictor effect. Furthermore the 4% liposomal lidocaine cream has the advantage of an anesthetic effect after 30 minutes, rather than 60 minutes for the 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine cream. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the 4% liposomal lidocaine has relatively minor vasoconstrictor effect when compared to the other anesthetic, and it shows how this type of anesthetic allows a clear vision of the lesion during the dermatologic procedures. Furthermore, this cream achieves an anesthetic effect in 30 minutes rather than the 60 minutes required for the other cream, making the first one more suitable for cosmetic dermatologic procedures and for the emergency.

Development of lidocaine-coated microneedle product for rapid, safe, and prolonged local analgesic action.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate rapid (~1 min) lidocaine delivery using 3M's solid microstructured transdermal system (sMTS) for prolonged, local analgesic action. METHODS: Polymeric microneedles were fabricated via injection molding and then dip-coated using an aqueous lidocaine formulation. The amount of lidocaine coated onto the microneedles was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). To assess drug delivery and dermal pharmacokinetics, lidocaine-coated microneedles were inserted into domestic swine. Skin punch biopsies were collected and analyzed to determine lidocaine concentration in skin using HPLC-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Commercial lidocaine/prilocaine EMLA (Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetic) cream was used as comparative control. RESULTS: Lidocaine dissolves rapidly off the microneedles and into skin such that the 1-min wear time achieves or exceeds lidocaine tissue levels needed to cause analgesia. This therapeutic threshold (100 ng/mg) was estimated by measuring the total amount of lidocaine and prilocaine in skin following a 1 h EMLA application. When co-formulated with 0.03 wt% vasoconstrictor-epinephrine, the concentration of lidocaine in tissue was maintained above 100 ng/mg for approximately 90 min. CONCLUSIONS: 3M's sMTS can be used to provide rapid delivery of lidocaine for local analgesia up to 90 min.

A pharmacokinetic study of a topical anesthetic (EMLA® ) in mouse soft tissue laceration.

The use of topical anesthesia instead of injection of local anesthetics for managing soft tissue lacerations in the emergency situations may be a relief for both patients and surgeons. Topical anesthesia in the form of a cream eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA®) containing 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine has been reported as an efficient anesthetic on skin before venipuncture anesthesia and as an alternative to injection anesthesia in some minor surgery situations. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of EMLA® when applied in a laceration with topical skin application in the mouse. A total of 120 Albino Laboratory-bred strain mouse (BALB-c) male mice were divided into three groups with regard to application mode of EMLA®. Group A: with laceration, 48 mice; Group B: on intact shaved skin, 48 mice; Group C: control group (24 mice) with same procedures but without application of EMLA®. Blood levels were collected at 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 min post-EMLA® application. Plasma sample analysis was carried out by employing liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method, and the pharmacokinetic analysis of the mouse plasma samples was estimated by standard non-compartmental methods. The pharmacokinetic parameters of lidocaine and prilocaine were significantly altered following EMLA® application to lacerated mouse skin in contrast to intact skin. The absorption of lidocaine and prilocaine was rapid following application of EMLA® to lacerated and intact mouse skin. Maximum drug plasma concentration (C(max) ) and area under the drug plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) values of lidocaine were significantly increased by 448.6% and 161.5%, respectively, following application of EMLA to lacerated mouse skin in comparison with intact mouse skin. Similarly, prilocaine's C(max) and AUC values were also increased by 384% and 265.7%, respectively, following EMLA application to lacerated mouse skin, in contrast to intact skin. Further pharmacokinetic studies on different carriers of lidocaine/prilocaine are warranted before any firm conclusions for the clinic can be drawn.

Pharmacokinetics and clinical toxicity of prilocaine and ropivacaine following combined drug administration in brachial plexus anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: Local anesthetics (LA) are often administered in combination for regional anesthesia in order to obtain the specific advantages (onset and duration of effect) of each drug. However, few data on the safety of such combinations are available and consequently plasma concentrations possibly associated with toxicity and interactions between the specific anesthetics are not sufficiently established. We measured pharmacokinetics and toxicity parameters of prilocaine and ropivacaine after combined use as single doses in brachial plexus blockade. METHODS: In an open clinical study using a combined dose regime (300 mg prilocaine followed immediately by 75 mg ropivacaine) total plasma concentrations of prilocaine and ropivacaine were measured serially in 60 patients using a gas-chromatographic method. The data were analyzed regarding a relationship with central nervous and cardiovascular toxicity. RESULTS: Following the administration in combination prilocaine and ropivacaine were rapidly absorbed. Mean prilocaine peak plasma concentrations (mean Cmax = 1.51 microg/ml) were measured between 15 and 30 min after injection. Highest ropivacaine plasma concentrations (mean Cmax = 1.12 microg/ml) were seen between 30 min and 1 hour after injection (calculated mean tmax = 44 min). One of 59 patients showed signs of myoclonus which were suspected of being due to intravascular injection. There was no relevant cardiovascular toxicity observed in terms of changes in the QRS complex, PQ interval prolongation, AV dissociation, occurrence of extrasystoles or sinus arrest. The pharmacokinetics of combined administration did not differ from those of prilocaine and ropivacaine given alone. CONCLUSION: The use of a combined prilocaine/ ropivacaine (300 mg/75 mg) dose regimen in patients given single dose for brachial plexus blockade can generally be regarded as safe with regard to peak plasma concentrations and cardiovascular toxicity and this holds true for patients with a higher perioperative risk profile (ASA III grading, American Society of Anesthesiologists). The considerable inter-individual variation in LA peak plasma concentrations observed in our patients and the one case of suspected accidental intravascular injection, highlight the necessity of adequate monitoring of the patients undergoing LA injections.

Reversal of central nervous system and cardiac toxicity after local anesthetic intoxication by lipid emulsion injection.

A 91-yr-old man (57 kg, 156 cm, ASA III) received an infraclavicular brachial plexus block for surgery of bursitis of the olecranon. Twenty minutes after infraclavicular injection of 30 mL of mepivacaine 1% (Scandicain) and 5 min after supplementation of 10 mL of prilocaine 1% (Xylonest) using an axillary approach, the patient complained of agitation and dizziness and became unresponsive to verbal commands. In addition, supraventricular extrasystole with bigeminy occurred. Local anesthetic toxicity was suspected and a dose of 200 mL of a 20% lipid emulsion was infused. Symptoms of central nervous system and cardiac toxicity disappeared within 5 and 15 min after the first lipid injection, respectively. Plasma concentrations of local anesthetics were determined before, 20, and 40 min after lipid infusion and were 4.08, 2.30, and 1.73 microg/mL for mepivacaine and 0.92, 0.35, and 0.24 microg/mL for prilocaine. These concentrations are below previously reported thresholds of toxicity above 5 microg/mL for both local anesthetics. Signs of toxicity resolved and the patient underwent the scheduled surgical procedure uneventfully under brachial plexus blockade.

The effects of general anesthesia on whole body and regional pharmacokinetics of local anesthetics at toxic doses.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetic toxicity is often studied experimentally in anesthetized subjects, but clinical toxicity usually occurs in conscious patients. In this study, we determined the influence of general anesthesia on the pharmacokinetics of six local anesthetics administered i.v. at approximately the highest recommended doses. METHODS: Chronically instrumented ewes (approximately 45-50 kg, n = 18) were infused over 3 min with (base doses as HCl salts) bupivacaine (100 mg), levobupivacaine (125 mg), ropivacaine (150 mg), lidocaine (350 mg), mepivacaine (350 mg), or prilocaine (350 mg), on separate occasions when conscious and halothane anesthetized. Serial arterial, heart, and brain venous blood drug concentrations were measured by achiral/chiral high-performance liquid chromatography, as relevant. Whole body pharmacokinetics were assessed by noncompartmental analysis; heart and brain pharmacokinetics were assessed by mass balance. Drug blood binding, in the absence and presence of halothane, was assessed by equilibrium dialysis in vitro. RESULTS: Blood local anesthetic concentrations were doubled with anesthesia because of decreased whole body distribution and clearance (respectively, to 33% and 52% of values when conscious). Heart and brain net drug uptake were greater under anesthesia, reflecting slower efflux from both regions. Clearances of R-bupivacaine > S-bupivacaine and R-prilocaine > S-prilocaine, but, mepivacaine clearance was not enantioselective. Halothane did not influence blood binding of the local anesthetics. CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia significantly changed whole body and regional pharmacokinetics of each local anesthetic as well as the systemic effects. General anesthesia is thus an important but frequently overlooked factor in studies of local anesthetic toxicity.

Local anesthetic cream prepared from lidocaine-tetracaine eutectic mixture.

Local anesthetic creams for the clinical treatment of conditions such as postherpetic neuralgia were prepared as an in-house formulation from the eutectic mixture of lidocaine-tetracaine (LT cream) using two eutectic mixtures of local anesthetic (EMLA) type bases. The LT formulation was compared with a lidocaine-prilocaine (LP cream) eutectic mixture formulated using the same base as EMLA. The chemical stability of lidocaine was examined in advance and was found to be stable for more than 3 months either in LT cream or in LP cream. The release rate of lidocaine from the formulated creams was examined using a cellulose ester membrane. The release rate of lidocaine from LT cream was similar to that from LP cream. The release rate of tetracaine was slightly slower than that of lidocaine in LT cream reflecting the larger molecular size of tetracaine. The penetration rate was examined in vitro using a Yucatan micropig skin. The penetration rate of lidocaine was similar between LT and LP creams. Infiltration anesthesia action examined in guinea pigs indicated that the difference between the two creams was statistically insignificant. The present study suggests the equivalence of the LT and LP creams as a local anesthetic and the potential of LT cream for clinical use either in the easy formulation or in the low-cost formulation.

Design and evaluation of lidocaine- and prilocaine-coloaded nanoparticulate drug delivery systems for topical anesthetic analgesic therapy: a comparison between solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers.

PURPOSE: Topical anesthesia analgesic therapy has diverse applicability in solving the barrier properties of skin and unfavorable physicochemical properties of drugs. Lidocaine (LID) combined with prilocaine (PRI) has been used as a topical preparation for dermal anesthesia for treatment of conditions such as paresthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, for combination anesthesia and overcoming the drawbacks of LID and PRI, respectively, LID- and PRI-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) were prepared and characterized by determination of their particle size, drug loading capacity, stability, in vitro drug release behavior and in vitro cellular viability. Ex vivo skin permeation and in vivo anesthesia analgesic efficiency of these two systems were also evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Results revealed that combination delivery of the dual drugs exhibited more remarkable efficiency than signal drug-loaded systems. SLN systems have better ex vivo skin permeation ability than NLCs. NLC systems revealed a stronger in vivo anesthesia analgesic effect than SLN systems. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that SLNs and NLCs have different advantages, and that both carriers are promising dual drug delivery systems for topical anesthetic analgesic therapy.

The "inverted cup" -- a novel in vitro release technique for drugs in lipid formulations.

The aim of this study was to develop a membrane-free in vitro release method for drugs in lipid formulations. It was intended to be applicable to as wide a range as possible of preparations, independently of their polarity and viscosity. The principle of the novel technique is to keep the sample suspended in the release medium in an inverted glass cup, allowing a possible phase transition or swelling. Thirteen formulations containing bupivacaine, lidocaine and/or prilocaine in lipid vehicles with different physical properties were prepared and examined. When possible, in vitro release profiles obtained by the new method were compared to profiles obtained by earlier techniques. For three formulations of either bupivacaine or lidocaine in polar lipid formulations, in vitro release profiles were evaluated in relation to in vivo data, from nerve block and pharmacokinetic studies in rats. Preparations that could be investigated both by the "inverted cup" and by the earlier published "single drop" technique generally showed good agreement between the two release profiles. In the case of the polar lipid formulations, arterial blood concentration curves in rats could reasonably be predicted from the in vitro release profiles. In conclusion, the "inverted cup" technique should potentially be applicable to a wide range of lipid formulations of drugs, both for physico-chemical characterisation and for obtaining in vitro -- in vivo correlations.

New insights into eutectic cream skin penetration enhancement.

The manner in which the eutectic cream EMLA enhances the percutaneous penetration of lidocaine and prilocaine into human skin is still not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the modification of drug aggregation played a role in the way EMLA facilitates delivery. Light scattering analysis of lidocaine alone in water gave a critical aggregation concentration (CAC) of 572 µM and a mean aggregate size of 58.8 nm. The analysis of prilocaine in identical conditions gave a CAC of 1177 µM and a mean aggregate size of 105.7 ± 24.8 nm. When the two drugs were mixed at their eutectic 1:1 ratio in water the CAC reduced to 165.8 µM and the aggregate size was 43.82 nm. This lidocaine-prilocaine interaction in water was further modified upon addition of polyoxyethylene hydrogenated castor oil, the surfactant in the EMLA aqueous phase, to produce aggregates of <20 nm. The physical characterisation data suggested that it was the EMLA cream's surfactant that modified the drug molecular interactions in the aqueous continuous phase and caused a 6 fold higher drug penetration through human epidermal tissue compared to the oil formulations tested in this study.

EMLA cream in the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia. Efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile.

The analgesic efficacy of 5% of EMLA cream (5 or 10 g) when applied for 24 h periods was evaluated in 5 female and 7 male patients (mean age 69 years, range 50-85 years) with refractory post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). Mean visual analogue pain intensity scores for all patients were significantly improved 6 h after application (P less than 0.05). In a subgroup of patients with facial PHN receiving EMLA cream, 5 g (n = 4), there were significant improvements in pain intensity scores at 6 h (P less than 0.05). 8 h (P less than 0.01) and 10 h (P less than 0.01) after application. Plasma lignocaine and plasma prilocaine concentrations were well below potentially toxic levels in all patients after application.

Eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream. A review of the topical anaesthetic/analgesic efficacy of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA).

Eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream 5% is a eutectic mixture of the local anaesthetics lidocaine (lignocaine) 25 mg/g and prilocaine 25 mg/g that provides dermal anaesthesia/analgesia following topical application. The principal indication in which eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream has been studied is the management of pain associated with venipuncture or intravenous cannulation, where significantly greater pain relief than placebo, with equivalent efficacy to ethyl chloride spray and lidocaine infiltration, has been demonstrated. In dermatological surgery, eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream offers effective pain relief in children undergoing curettage of molluscum contagiosum lesions, and in adults undergoing split-skin graft harvesting. Particular benefit has also been shown with use of eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream in association with treatment of condylomata acuminata in both men and women, and it appears to provide a useful alternative to lidocaine infiltration in this context. Further research in such indications as paediatric lumbar puncture, minor otological surgery, and minor gynaecological, urological and andrological procedures is likely to further broaden the profile of clinical use for eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream. Eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream has a very favourable tolerability profile, transient and mild skin blanching and erythema being the most frequent adverse events to occur in association with its application to skin. The potential for inducing methaemoglobinaemia, attributed to a metabolite of the prilocaine component of the formulation, prohibits its use in infants younger than 6 months. In summary, eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream is a novel formulation of local anaesthetics that has proven to be effective and well-tolerated in the relief of pain associated with various minor interventions in adults and children.

Prilocaine elimination by isolated perfused rat lung and liver.

Prilocaine is assumed to undergo significant elimination by extrahepatic organs and to differ in this respect from other commonly used local anaesthetics. In order to clarify whether the lung may play an important role as a site of elimination of prilocaine, the kinetic parameters were studied in isolated perfused rat lungs and were compared to those of isolated livers. Furthermore, the structurally related compounds bupivacaine and mepivacaine were also investigated in this system. Prilocaine was dispersed into a relatively large apparent distribution volume in perfused rat lung (139 ml versus 97 ml in controls). In single-pass perfused lungs the observed maximum of concentration was decreased by about 60% compared to controls. The mean residence time was prolonged by about 40%. These observations suggest that prilocaine is substantially retained by rat lung and that this effect occurs particularly during first-pass. However, the ability of rat lung to degrade prilocaine was relatively low. The clearance values were about 0.3 ml/min equal to about 20% of the hepatic capacity calculated per g of tissue. Thus it must be assumed that prilocaine is only transiently retained by the lung and will gain systemic availability later on. In rat lungs the kinetics of prilocaine elimination were not substantially different from those of bupivacaine and mepivacaine (16 and 12%). These observations do not support the assumption that especially prilocaine undergoes extrahepatic elimination.