Induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab after kidney transplantation: a health economic analysis from a German perspective.

A health economic analysis was undertaken based on the 1-year database from a randomized study of rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG) versus basiliximab, in kidney transplantation using resource utilization data and cost estimates from three German hospitals. A three-state Markov model was applied to estimate cost-effectiveness to 10 years post-transplant. Total mean treatment cost per patient to year 1 post-transplant was €62 075 vs. €59 767 for rATG versus basiliximab (P < 0.01). rATG therapy was associated with similar treatment costs to basiliximab by year 2, and a predicted cumulative treatment cost saving of €4 259 under rATG versus basiliximab by year 10 post-transplant. The mean number of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient by year 1 was 0.809 vs. 0.802 in the rATG and basiliximab cohorts, respectively (P = 0.38), with cumulative QALYs of 6.161 and 6.065 per patient by year 10. By year 2, the cumulative cost per QALY was slightly lower under rATG (€35 378) than basiliximab (€35 885), progressing to a saving of €1 041 under rATG for the cumulative cost per QALY by year 10. In conclusion, this model indicates that rATG induction provides a modest increase in QALYs with lower long-term costs than basiliximab in deceased-donor high-risk kidney transplant patients.

Modelling cost effectiveness of horse antithymocyte globulin for treating severe aplastic anaemia in Germany.

Acquired severe aplastic anaemia (AA) is a serious condition caused by immune-triggered bone marrow failure. For patients not eligible for bone marrow transplantation, treatment of choice is immunosuppression by a combined treatment with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine. The debate on treatment optimization in AA is focused on conflicting data regarding ATG preparations from horse (h-ATG) versus rabbit (r-ATG), recently favouring h-ATG. H-ATG has been withdrawn from the European market in 2007. Reimbursement for imported preparations from outside Europe is frequently denied in negotiations with statutory health insurance companies. This raises the question of whether h-ATG is cost effective and a sensible investment with regard to healthcare budgets as well as patient health. We modelled the cost effectiveness of r-ATG versus h-ATG based on a recent randomized trial and cost data provided by the hospital pharmacy of Jena University Hospital. We calculated the amount of life years gained and the average incremental costs per life year gained when comparing h-ATG and r-ATG. Our calculations revealed average incremental costs per life year gained of 11,033.80 for the examined patient population treated with h-ATG when compared to r-ATG. Assuming a cost effectiveness threshold of 25,000-35,000 per life year gained, our calculations demonstrate cost effectiveness of h-ATG as compared to r-ATG.

Clinical and economic analysis of delayed administration of antithymocyte globulin for induction therapy in kidney transplantation.

CONTEXT: The increasing number of marginal deceased kidney donors and an aging recipient population, prolonged hospitalization, and increased costs have destabilized the economic viability of kidney transplants. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a delay in the administration of the day-of-discharge dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin would result in equivalent clinical outcomes with cost savings. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, observational before-and-after study of adult kidney transplant recipients who received induction with rabbit antithymocyte globulin.Intervention-Patients who received a transplant between June 2006 and February 2009 and received rabbit antithymocyte globulin served as the control group. Patients who received a transplant between March 2009 and August 2010 and received rabbit antithymocyte globulin had the day-of-discharge dose delayed to the following day and administered in the clinic. A total of 231 patients (146 in the control group, 85 in the study group) were included. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patients who had delayed administration of rabbit antithymocyte globulin had shorter stays (3.9 vs 3.1 days, P< .001) and reduced inpatient costs for rabbit antithymocyte globulin (mean $860/patient); these changes were achieved without affecting acute rejection rates (5% vs 5%, P> .99) or readmission rates. In conclusion, delayed inpatient administration of rabbit antithymocyte globulin provided identical clinical outcomes while helping to reduce inpatient costs and increase timely discharges.

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Versus Antithymocyte Globulin-fresenius as Induction Therapy for Patients With Kidney Transplantation From Donation After Cardiac Death in China.

PURPOSE: Induction immunosuppression therapy is used to support optimal outcomes in kidney transplantation. This study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) versus ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) in kidney transplantation in the Chinese setting from the perspective of the health care payer. METHODS: A 2-part survival model was developed, consisting of a short-term part and a long-term part. The short-term part analyzed the first year, using the decision tree, and consisted of the functioning transplant, acute rejection (AR), delayed graft function (DGF), dialysis, and death health states. The long-term part analyzed 2 to 5 years, using Markov model, and consisted of the functioning transplant, chronic dysfunction, recurring primary disease, dialysis, and death health states, with capture of the association between DGF and graft loss. Costs, including drug acquisition and other direct medical costs, were derived from China IQVIA database (formerly known as IMS) hospitaldatabase, chart review, and physician interviews. Clinical outcomes and utility were retrieved from published literature. The model calculated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and total costs per patient. Costs and QALYs were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. Univariate sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to assess the impact of uncertainty of the variables on the results. FINDINGS: Patients who received r-ATG had more clinical effectiveness than patients who received ATG-F mainly because of less AR, DGF, and dialysis. The incremental QALY was 0.01 over a 1-year time horizon and 0.0496 over a 5-year time horizon. R-ATG and ATG-F drug costs were ¥10,783 and ¥8409, respectively. However, the total treatment costs of the r-ATG arm were lower than the ATG-F arm because of lower costs related to DGF, AR, dialysis, and adverse events. In total, r-ATG saved ¥5423 over the 1-year and ¥7042 over the 5-year time horizon. R-ATG was dominant with lower total direct medical costs and higher QALYs compared with ATG-F. Both univariate sensitivity analysis and PSA found the robustness of the model results. PSA results indicated that r-ATG was cost-effective compared with ATG-F in 86.81% of the simulations, considering <3 times the gross domestic product per capita as the threshold. IMPLICATIONS: From the perspective of the health care payer, r-ATG should be considered as the preferred treatment agent for induction therapy for Chinese patients undergoing kidney transplantation because of its lower overall medical costs and greater QALYs gained compared with ATG-F. The study was limited by lack of long-term efficacy data among the Chinese population and lack of comprehensive real-world higher quality costs data.

Cost-Effectiveness of Antibody-Based Induction Therapy in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy in deceased donor kidney transplantation is costly, with wide discrepancy in utilization and a limited evidence base, particularly regarding cost-effectiveness. METHODS: We linked the United States Renal Data System data set to Medicare claims to estimate cumulative costs, graft survival, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER - cost per additional year of graft survival) within 3 years of transplantation in 19 450 deceased donor kidney transplantation recipients with Medicare as primary payer from 2000 to 2008. We divided the study cohort into high-risk (age > 60 years, panel-reactive antibody > 20%, African American race, Kidney Donor Profile Index > 50%, cold ischemia time > 24 hours) and low-risk (not having any risk factors, comprising approximately 15% of the cohort). After the elimination of dominated options, we estimated expected ICER among induction categories: no-induction, alemtuzumab, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG), and interleukin-2 receptor-antagonist. RESULTS: No-induction was the least effective and most costly option in both risk groups. Depletional antibodies (r-ATG and alemtuzumab) were more cost-effective across all willingness-to-pay thresholds in the low-risk group. For the high-risk group and its subcategories, the ICER was very sensitive to the graft survival; overall both depletional antibodies were more cost-effective, mainly for higher willingness to pay threshold (US $100 000 and US $150 000). Rabbit ATG appears to achieve excellent cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (80% of the recipients) in both risk groups at US $50 000 threshold (except age > 60 years). In addition, only r-ATG was associated with graft survival benefit over no-induction category (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.99) in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Antibody-based induction appears to offer substantial advantages in both cost and outcome compared with no-induction. Overall, depletional induction (preferably r-ATG) appears to offer the greatest benefits.

A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in combination with thymoglobulin in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: To date, the clinical trials of tacrolimus (TAC) versus cyclosporine modified (CsA), have not defined which agent is more cost-effective for immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients especially in a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: The objective of this randomized, prospective study was to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of TAC versus CsA, in a regimen that consisted of Thymoglobulin induction, an antimetabolite, and prednisone. Between December 2000 and October 2002, 200 patients were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 fashion (TAC n=134, CsA n=66). RESULTS: At 1 year, acute rejection (4% TAC vs. 6% CsA), patient survival (TAC 99% vs. CsA 100%), and graft survival (95% TAC versus 100% CsA, P=0.059) were similar. Serum creatinine levels were lower in the TAC group compared with the CsA group (1.3+/-0.3 vs. 1.6+/-0.7 mg/dL, P=0.03). The incidence of CMV infection was similar between the groups and two patients, both in the TAC arm, developed malignancy. Anti-hypertensive requirement (32% TAC vs. 32% CsA) and the incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (4% TAC vs. 2% CsA) were similar. Pretransplant, fewer TAC patients received dyslipidemia treatment (40% TAC vs. 67% CsA, P=0.0005), while more CsA patients were able to discontinue these medications posttransplant (absolute change 25% TAC vs. 47% CsA). Total 12-month medication costs were similar (17,723 +/- 11,647 dollars TAC vs. 16,515 +/- 10,189 dollars CsA). CONCLUSIONS: When combined with Thymoglobulin induction, an antimetabolite, and corticosteroids, TAC and CsA are comparable in safety, efficacy, and cost in renal transplantation.

Comparison of induction based on continuous vs discontinuous administration of antithymocyte globulins in renal transplant patients: efficacy and long-term safety.

UNLABELLED: This retrospective study sought to compare two modes of administration of antithymocyte globulin (RATG) after renal transplantation. METHODS: Before 1993, group I patients (n = 93) received fixed doses of RATG (1 mg/kg per day) for 8 consecutive days. Thereafter, RATG was either continued at the same dose for 15 days, in cases of delayed graft function, or was infused every other day at the same dose until serum creatinine level became <150 micromol/L. After 1993, group II patients (n = 66) received RATG at full dose (1 mg/kg per day) during the first 3 days and thereafter the doses were adjusted to target a CD2 T-cell count <50/mm3. Both groups received steroids, azathioprine, and cyclosporine. The mean follow-up after transplantation was 117 +/- 31 months in group I and 93 +/- 19 months in group II. RESULTS: The RATG cumulative dose and consequently cost were significantly higher among group I than group II patients. Long-term patient and graft survival were similar in both groups. The rate of acute graft-rejection episodes was significantly higher among group I than group II patients. At 7 years posttransplantation, the serum creatinine level and creatinine clearance were similar in the two groups. The rate of cytomegalovirus infection, as well as the cumulative incidence of severe infections and cancers were also similar in both groups. Among the cancers, skin neoplasms represented 30% in group I and 26% in group II (P = ns). CONCLUSION: Adjusting RATG doses according to the CD2 lymphocyte count is safe, and a less expensive than using full doses.

Polyclonal versus monoclonal induction therapy in a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation: a comparison of efficacy and costs.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy in renal transplantation reduces the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in expanded criteria donation (ECD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD). We compared the efficacy of Thymoglobulin (Sanofi-Aventis, Spain), ATG Fresenius (ATG-Fresenius, Spain), and Simulect (Novartis Farm, Spain) in a calcineurin-free protocol in ECD and DCD renal transplantation by evaluating patient survival, graft survival, and AR at 1 year and overall costs. METHODS: An observational retrospective study was performed using our database of 289 consecutive cadaveric ECD renal transplant recipients (n = 178) and DCD recipients (n = 111) from April 1999 to December 2011. Induction therapy consisted of Simulect, Thymoglobulin, and ATG Fresenius. Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free maintenance therapy consisted of mycophenolate mofetil or sodium and steroids. RESULTS: There were no differences in the patients' demographic characteristics or patient and graft survival. One-year AR rates were equivalent (ECD: 10%, 19.1%, 17.7% versus DCD: 14.3%, 7.1%, 16.7%). Leukopenia and thrombopenia were significantly more frequent in the ECD group treated with polyclonal induction. The average total cost of transplantation was higher in the ECD group but there were no significant differences in the average total cost between ECD and DCD: 39,970.31 ± 7,732€ versus 35,058.34 ± 6,801€ (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Our study shows the same efficacy with polyclonal and monoclonal antibody induction and a CNI-free treatment regimen in ECD and DCD renal transplantation with no differences in overall costs at 1 year after transplantation.

PREventing Delayed Graft Function by Driving Immunosuppressive InduCtion Treatment (PREDICT-DGF): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In kidney transplantation, the use of Anti-Thymocyte Globulins (ATG) as induction therapy has been described as a possible treatment for reducing the prevalence of Delayed Graft Function (DGF). ATG possesses pharmaceutical proprieties that could help control the lesions caused by ischemia reperfusion injury. However, other studies have questioned this potential protective effect. We hypothesized that the benefits related to ATG for reducing DGF prevalence may be higher and more consistently recognized if only patients with high DGF risk are considered. We recently proposed a scoring system entitled DGFS (Delayed Graft Function Score) for such stratification of kidney transplant recipients according to their risk of DGF. Using the DGFS calculation, we aim to determine whether a short course of ATG can decrease the incidence of DGF in comparison with Basiliximab in kidney transplant recipients with low immunological risk but high DGF risk. METHODS: We conduct a phase IV, open label, randomized, multicentric and prospective study, to compare ATG in parallel with a control group treated by Basiliximab. The 1:1 randomized allocation of patients between groups is stratified on the clinical center, and on the hypothermic machine-perfusion device. We aimed to include a total of 384 patients to achieve a statistical power at 0.80. The study was initiated at the Nantes University hospital in July 2014, with data collection continuing until April 2018, and publication of the results proposed for 2019. DISCUSSION: The main expected benefits of this study are i) the reduction of unjustified ATG over-prescriptions associated with serious adverse events, ii) the reduction of chance losses related to ATG under-prescription, iii) the decrease in the incidence of DGF which was described as a risk factor of graft failure and patient death, and iv) the reduction in hospitalization duration and number of post transplantation dialysis sessions, both being associated with reduced medical costs. In conclusion, the current study is innovative by proposing a more efficient and personalized induction therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry (# NCT02056938, February 5, 2014), and in the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT #2014-000332-42, January 30, 2014).

CD3 monitoring of antithymocyte globulin therapy in thoracic organ transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Antithymocyte globulin is frequently used as a component of induction therapy in thoracic organ transplantation. This study evaluates the utility of monitoring peripheral CD3 lymphocytes to rationally adjust antithymocyte globulin therapy in this patient population. METHODS: A total of 17 heart and 19 lung transplant recipients received antithymocyte globulin (ATGAM or thymoglobulin) as induction therapy or to treat steroid-resistant acute or chronic rejection. Absolute CD3 counts were maintained between 50 and 100 cells/microl. RESULTS: With CD3 monitoring, the doses of antithymocyte globulin were reduced from 10-15 mg/kg to 1-5 mg/kg during the course of therapy. The total amount of antithymocyte globulin given to each CD3 monitored patient was reduced by 48%. Dose reduction did not alter the number of acute rejection or infectious episodes, and hematological side effects were infrequent. CONCLUSION: CD3 monitoring of antithymocyte globulin therapy in thoracic organ recipients reduced the amount of drug received by each patient, while maintaining CD3 counts less than 100 cells/microl.

Safety, efficacy, and cost analysis of thymoglobulin induction therapy with intermittent dosing based on CD3+ lymphocyte counts in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: In view of the superior T-cell depletion and prolonged half-life of thymoglobulin, we initiated a protocol to administer thymoglobulin intermittently based on peripheral blood CD3+ lymphocyte counts. METHODS: In this prospective study, 41 consecutive high-risk cadaver transplant recipients (panel reactive antibody level >30%, repeat transplant recipients, simultaneous pancreas and kidney or pancreas after kidney recipients, prolonged cold-ischemia time, prolonged donor hypotension, non-heart-beating donors) who received thymoglobulin induction therapy were included. The first dose (1.5 mg/kg) of thymoglobulin was administered intraoperatively. CD3+ lymphocyte count in the peripheral blood was determined daily and repeat doses were administered when the CD3+ count was >20 cells/mm3. Calcineurin inhibitors (CI) in low doses were introduced when the allograft function recovered and the serum creatinine level dropped by at least 25% from the pretransplant level. Thymoglobulin treatment was discontinued once therapeutic CI drug levels were achieved. Concomitant immunosuppression consisted of mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. RESULTS: The mean individual thymoglobulin dose was 104 mg (1.4 mg/kg), and the total cumulative dose per patient was 318 mg (4.2 mg/kg). Patients received an average of three doses and a mean of six CD3 counts were obtained per patient. Introduction of CI was delayed for an average of 6 days posttransplantation. At a mean follow-up of 340 days, two (4.9%) patients died; three (7.3%) renal allografts and two (18.2%) pancreas allografts were lost. Five (12.2%) patients developed a total of six acute rejection episodes. The mean serum creatinine in the 38 patients with a functioning kidney was 1.47 mg/dl, and the mean blood glucose in the 9 pancreas allograft recipients was 89 mg/dl. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurred in one (2.4%) patient. No posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders were seen in this patient cohort. The hospital pharmacy charge for a 100-mg dose of thymoglobulin at this center was $2,165, and the laboratory charge for a single CD3 determination was $70. In this study, the average charges per patient for the total dose of thymoglobulin and six CD3 determinations were $7305. In comparison, the charge for daily administration of 104 mg of thymoglobulin (which was the mean dose) for 6 days (mean time to CI therapy initiation) would be $13,510 and for 10 days (mean time to therapeutic CI levels) would be $22,516. This represents a savings of 46% and 68%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent thymoglobulin therapy, based on peripheral blood CD3+ lymphocyte counts, is safe and associated with low acute rejection rate in high-risk kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. A mean of three doses resulted in adequate suppression of CD3+ lymphocytes permitting delayed introduction of CI in low doses until recovery of renal function occurred. When compared to traditional daily administration, intermittent therapy results in significant cost savings and reduces the total cumulative dose of this potent immunosuppressive agent.

Cyclosporine minimization and cost reduction in renal transplant recipients receiving a C2-monitored, cyclosporine-based quadruple immunosuppressive regimen.

BACKGROUND: Targeting 2-hr postdose cyclosporine (C2) levels to 1,000 to 1,700 mg/dL during the first 6 months after renal transplantation is recommended for triple immunosuppressive regimens. This trial determines whether lower C2 levels could be targeted safely in de novo kidney transplant recipients under a quadruple regimen compared with a similar cohort monitored with trough (C0) levels. METHODS: This single-center, sequential, cohort-designed trial included patients who received Thymoglobulin, corticosteroids, an antimetabolite, and cyclosporine monitored by C2 (n=50) or C0 (n=50). Cyclosporine was tapered to maintain the C2 between 1,000 and 1,200 ng/mL months 0 to 3 and between 600 and 1,000 ng/mL thereafter and C0 between 250 and 350 ng/mL months 0 to 3 and between 100 and 250 ng/mL thereafter. RESULTS: Baseline patient and donor characteristics were similar. There were no differences in graft survival (100% C2 vs. 100% C0), acute rejection (4% C2 vs. 6% C0), allograft function, or adverse events at 6 months. C2 levels were lower than the suggested guidelines throughout the study (33% lower at 1 month and 48% lower at 6 months). Lower cyclosporine doses were achieved in the C2 arm compared with the C0 arm by 1 month and were sustained throughout the trial, which translated into an average cyclosporine cost savings of USD $773 in the C2 arm during the 6-month period (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: With a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen and lower C2 targets than recommended for triple therapy, safe and effective cyclosporine minimization was achieved. Lower cyclosporine doses were achieved in C2-monitored patients compared with C0-monitored patients, translating into lower immunosuppressive costs.

Dose-reduced conditioning for allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation: durable engraftment without antithymocyte globulin.

Between February 1998 and October 1999, 24 patients with advanced leukemia, lymphoma or solid tumors received G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from HLA-matched sibling donors after dose-reduced conditioning therapy. Only patients with reduced performance status or major infectious complications, not eligible for standard transplant procedures, were included. The 5-day conditioning therapy consisted of 3.3 mg/kg intravenous busulphan x 2 days and 30 mg/m2 fludarabine x 5 days. GVHD prophylaxis was performed with either CsA alone (n = 5), CsA combined with short course methotrexate (n = 5) or mycophenolate mofetil (n = 14). The day 100 survival was 95.2% for the whole group. All patients engrafted after a median of 15 days (range, 11-19) and 12.5 days (range, 10-19) for neutrophils and platelets, respectively. The median time to a neutrophil count of <0.5 x 109/l was 7 days (range, 2 to 12). Acute GVHD >I was observed in six patients, whereas eight patients have signs of chronic GVHD. The prospective 12 month overall survival with a median follow-up of 7 months is 63%. Relapse of disease and toxicity associated with chronic GVHD were the main causes of death. The treatment-related mortality was 12.5%. Dose-reduced conditioning using intravenous busulphan and fludarabine allows stable engraftment without ATG in related transplants and leads to a reduction of transplant-related mortality.

The crime of saving lives. The FDA, John Najarian, and Minnesota ALG.

The indictment of John Najarian, MD, and Richard Condie at Minneapolis, Minn, on April 10, 1995, was a defining episode in the prolonged agony that has ensued since August 1992, when the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) placed Minnesota Anti-Lymphocyte Globulin (MALG) on clinical hold, bringing to an end its use as an immunosuppressive agent for patients undergoing transplantation. The principal charge in the indictment is that from about 1968 until 1992--the whole period of the development and use of MALG--Dr Najarian and Mr Condie conspired to defraud the United States by impeding the FDA in its oversight of biological drugs and that they did so for the purpose of financial gain. If the charges can be considered seriously, they mean that Dr Najarian's purpose in the development and manufacture of MALG was to make money, presumably for himself, and that the possible benefit of MALG to the patients was of secondary concern to him. Several difficulties arise immediately. In 1968, MALG offered a promising new approach to immunosuppression. In a relatively crude form, it had been used at the University of Colorado with striking improvement in the survival of patients undergoing transplantation and transplanted organs, but it was painful to administer by intramuscular injections and, in addition to other side effects, produced muscular spasms. Dr Najarian and his colleagues succeeded in purifying MALG so that the pure globulin could be injected into a central vein. The process of purification was complicated and expensive, so it was hardly practical for each transplant center to produce MALG for itself. Thus, in 1969, when Dr Najarian submitted an investigational new drug application (IND) to the FDA, he stated that his purpose was to manufacture MALG not only for patients at the University of Minnesota Hospital but also for patients at other transplant centers, which were not in a position to make it for themselves. He asked the FDA to approve recovery of the cost of providing MALG to other institutions. The FDA approved Dr Najarian's IND application early in 1970 but did not respond to his request for cost recovery--then, or for the next 15 years. Dr Najarian was free to manufacture MALG and to distribute it to other transplant centers for investigational use, but as for paying for it, that was his problem. The FDA offered no suggestion.

Two approaches to comparing hospital charges between cadaveric renal transplant patients who received orthoclone OKT 3 sterile solution or Atgam sterile solution for induction therapy.

The objectives of this study were: (1) to compare total hospital charges for a sample of cadaveric renal transplant patients categorized according to the type of induction therapy used (Orthoclone OKT3 Sterile Solution or Atgam Sterile Solution); (2) to compare specific charge categories between the two groups; and (3) to examine the relationship between charges and a set of independent variables. A retrospective review was conducted of hospital charges associated with a sample of renal transplant patients. The overall sample for this study comprised 510 patient discharges from 22 hospitals in the United States. Comparisons between the OKT3 and Atgam groups were made for total and specific charge categories using two different approaches to help control variations in charges that were not related to the type of induction therapy used. The first approach consisted of t test or chi-square comparisons between the groups for subsets of observations that had been identified in a stepwise fashion. These judgment samples were defined to remove sources of variation in charges other than those resulting from the type of induction therapy selected. The second approach used multiple linear regression analysis to help statistically control variation in charges from other sources. The results showed that higher drug charges in the Atgam group were offset by lower charges in other categories (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that hospital formulary committees should consider all relevant costs, not just drug acquisition costs, when selecting products. However, further investigation is warranted to explore differences in charges due to: (1) between-hospital variation; (2) patients' severity of illness before receiving induction therapy; and (3) differences in side-effect profiles for the two induction therapies.

Induction immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients older than 60 years of age : safety and efficacy of ATGAM, OKT3 and Simulect.

BACKGROUND: The choice of induction immunosuppression for kidney transplantation in elderly recipients is dictated by the consideration of the risk of infection as well as efficacy in the prevention of acute rejection, thus allowing a reduction in subsequent maintenance immunosuppression and its attendant long-term adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the antibody induction immunosuppression strategies in elderly recipients of kidney transplants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present retrospective data analysis on 183 kidney transplant recipients > or = 60 years of age at Hahnemann University Hospital (Philadelphia, PA, USA) over a 12-year period. We compared four consecutive cohorts of kidney transplant recipients receiving lymphocyte immune globulin, equine antithymocyte globulin (ATGAM) [n = 29]; muromonab CD3 (OKT3) [n = 45]; basiliximab (Simulect) with corticosteroid maintenance [n = 40]; and Simulect without corticosteroid maintenance (n = 69). RESULTS: Delayed graft function (DGF) was observed in 48% of patients receiving ATGAM, 35.6% in the OKT3 group and 35% in the Simulect group with corticosteroid maintenance and 36.2% in the Simulect group without corticosteroid maintenance. The rejection rate within the first 3 months was 31% in the ATGAM and OKT3 groups, 17.5% in the Simulect group with corticosteroid maintenance and 14.5% in the Simulect group without corticosteroid maintenance. These differences for DGF and acute rejection were statistically significant between patients receiving ATGAM and OKT3, ATGAM or OKT3 and both groups of Simulect (all p < 0.05). Patients receiving Simulect were free of adverse effects typically encountered by patients receiving polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for induction. Patients receiving Simulect had much shorter hospital stays and benefited from significant reduction of costs compared with other groups. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that kidney transplant recipients > or = 60 years of age benefit from induction therapy with Simulect followed by corticosteroid-free maintenance immunosuppression.

Economics of the antithymocyte globulins Thymoglobulin and Atgam in the treatment of acute renal transplant rejection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic implications for transplant centres, Medicare and society of treatment of corticosteroid-resistant Banff Grades I, II and III acute kidney transplant rejection with the antithymocyte globulins Thymoglobulin or Atgam. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a cost analysis of a randomised double-blind multicentre clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of Thymoglobulin and Atgam that was performed at 25 centres in the US in 1994 to 1996. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: The study enrolled 163 patients, 82 in the Thymoglobulin arm and 81 in the Atgam arm. METHODS: Estimates of the cost of care from the initiation of rejection therapy to 90 days post-therapy were derived from various publicly available sources and applied to patient-specific clinical events documented in the clinical trial. Patients received either intravenous Thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg/day) for an average of 10 days or intravenous Atgam (15 mg/kg/day) for an average of 9.7 days. RESULTS: On average, Thymoglobulin provided significant cost savings compared with Atgam from the perspective of society [$US5977 (1996 values); 95% confidence interval (CI) $US3719 to $US8254], Medicare ($US4967; 95% CI $US3256 to $US6678) and the transplant centre ($US3087; 95% CI $US1512 to $US4667). The overall advantage attributable to Thymoglobulin was primarily due to savings from fewer recurrent rejection treatments and less frequent return to dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of acute renal transplant rejection with Thymoglobulin is a cost saving strategy when compared with treatment with Atgam.

CD3 monitoring and thymoglobulin therapy in cardiac transplantation: clinical outcomes and pharmacoeconomic implications.

INTRODUCTION: CD3 monitoring of antithymocyte globulin therapy in renal transplantation has been shown to be more cost-effective than standard regimens. The objective of this study was to evaluate CD3 monitoring with Thymoglobulin in cardiac transplantation. METHODS: Cardiac transplant patients who required antithymocyte globulin therapy were dose-adjusted to maintain absolute CD3 counts <25 cells/microL. Endomyocardial biopsies and hemodynamic parameters were used to assess efficacy. The incidences of hematological side effects, opportunistic infections, and malignancies were recorded; in addition we performed a cost comparison. RESULTS: Eight patients were treated with Thymoglobulin using CD3 monitoring to adjust the dosing. All patients responded with few side effects. Compared to standard dosing, CD3 monitoring allowed a 60% reduction in the average total dose and a 58% reduction in cost per patient. CONCLUSION: CD3 monitoring of Thymoglobulin therapy in cardiac transplant patients results in lower doses and reduced costs with equivalent efficacy and a low incidence of complications.

Immunophenotyping and efficacy of low dose ATG in non-sensitized kidney recipients undergoing early steroid withdrawal: a randomized pilot study.

UNLABELLED: Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is commonly used as an induction therapy in renal transplant recipients, but the ideal dosage in tacrolimus-based early steroid withdrawal protocols has not been established. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the immunophenotyping and efficacy of lower dose ATG in low immunological-risk kidney transplant recipients. In this prospective study, 45 patients were randomized (1∶1) to our standard dose ATG (total dose 3.75 mg/kg)(sATG) vs. lower dose 2.25 mg/kg (lowATG). All patients underwent early steroid withdrawal within 7 days. The primary end point was biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months. Prospective immunophenotyping of freshly isolated PBMCs was performed at baseline, 3, 6, 12 months post-transplant. The rate of acute rejection was 17% and 10% in the sATG and lowATG, respectively. Effector memory T cells, Tregs and recent thymic emigrants T cells had similar kinetics post-transplant in both groups. No statistically significant differences were found in graft survival, patient survival or infections between the two groups, though there was a non-significant increase in leukopenia (43%v s. 30%), CMV (8% vs. 0) and BK (4% vs. 0) infections in sATG group vs. lowATG. In sum, in low immunological risk kidney recipients undergoing steroid withdrawal, low dose ATG seems to be efficacious in preventing acute rejection and depleting T cells with potentially lower infectious complications. A larger study is warranted to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00548405.