Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BJU Int ; 120(3): 313-319, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28621055

RESUMEN

Aim of this study was to analyse the association between the use of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) and the development of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma. A systematic review of the published data was performed up to December 2016, using multiple search engines to identify eligible studies. A formal meta-analysis was conducted of studies comparing patients who underwent URS before RNU with those who did not. Hazard ratios (HRs), with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), from each study were used to calculate pooled HRs. Pooled estimates were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model according to heterogeneity. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan, version 5. Seven studies were included in the systematic review, but only six of these were deemed fully eligible for meta-analysis. Among the 2 382 patients included in the meta-analysis, 765 underwent diagnostic URS prior to RNU. All examined studies were retrospective, and the majority examined Asian populations. The IVR rate ranged from 39.2% to 60.7% and from 16.7% to 46% in patients with and without prior URS, respectively. In the pooled analysis, a statistically significant association was found between performance of URS prior to RNU and IVR (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.33-1.88; P < 0.001). There was no heterogeneity in the observed outcomes, according to the I2 statistic of 2% (P = 0.40). Within the intrinsic limitations of this type of analysis, these findings suggest a significant association between the use of diagnostic URS and higher risk of developing IVR after RNU. Further research in this area should be encouraged to further investigate the possible causality behind this association and it potential clinical implications.


Asunto(s)
Nefrectomía , Neoplasias Ureterales , Ureteroscopía , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Ureterales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ureterales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ureterales/patología , Neoplasias Ureterales/cirugía , Ureteroscopía/efectos adversos , Ureteroscopía/mortalidad , Ureteroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
World J Urol ; 34(3): 305-10, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26210344

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Advancements in the endourological equipment have made retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) an attractive, widespread technique, capable of competing with traditional shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Since the complication rate is generally low, even less is known about dramatic and fatal complications after RIRS. METHODS: We performed a survey asking 11 experienced endourologists to review their RIRS series and report the cases of mortality to their best knowledge. RESULTS: Six urologists reported on six fatal cases. In three cases, a history of urinary tract infections was present. Four patients died from urosepsis, one due to an anesthetic and one due to hemorrhagic complication. The use of ureteral access sheath was not common. CONCLUSION: Even respecting the standards of care, it may happen that physicians are occasionally tempted to overdo for their patients, sometimes skipping safety rules with an inevitable increase in risks. Despite the fact that RIRS has become a viable option for the treatment of the majority of kidney stones, its complication rates remain low. Nevertheless, rare fatal events may occur, especially in complex cases with a history of urinary tract infections, and advanced neurological diseases.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Ureteroscopía/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Cálculos Renales/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias
3.
BMC Urol ; 15: 92, 2015 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26337178

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine the incidence of later cancer detection and its risk factors after the first diagnostic ureteroscopy. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-six patients undergoing diagnostic ureteroscopy based on the suspicion of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UC of the UUT) between 1995 and 2012 were included. We examined the diagnostic outcome of the initial ureteroscopy. Thereafter, we collected follow-up data on patients who had not been diagnosed with UC of the UUT at the first examination, and evaluated the incidence of later cancer detection and its risk factors using Cox hazard models. RESULTS: Of the 166 patients, 76 (45.8%) were diagnosed with UC of the UUT at the first diagnostic ureteroscopy. The remaining 90 (54.2%) were diagnosed with other malignancies (n = 22), non-malignant disorders (n = 18), or without disorders (n = 50). Of these 90 patients, follow-up data were available in 65 patients (median: 41 months, range: 3-170). During the follow-up, carcinoma was detected in 6 patients (6/65, 9.2%) at a median of 43.5 months (range: 10-59). Episodes of gross hematuria (p = 0.0048) and abnormal cytological findings (p = 0.0335) during the follow-up and a male sex (p = 0.0316) were adverse risk factors. CONCLUSION: Later cancer detection of UC of the UUT was not uncommon after the first examination. The risk analysis revealed the aforementioned characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Ureteroscopía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Ureteroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
4.
BJU Int ; 110(5): 614-28, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22471401

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) using either ureteroscopy and laser ablation, or percutaneous resection, is a management option for treating selected low-grade tumours with favourable characteristics. However, the evidence base for such practice is relatively weak, as the reported experience is mainly limited to small case series (level of evidence 4), or non-randomised comparative studies that are unmatched for tumour stage (level of evidence 3b), with variability of follow-up duration and reported outcome measures. The present systematic review comprehensively reviews the outcomes of all studies of endoscopic management of UTUC, including the role of topical adjuvant therapy. It establishes for the first time a structured reference for endoscopic management of UTUC, and is a foundation for further clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the oncological outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with ureteroscopic and percutaneous management. The standard treatment of UTUC is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). However, over the last two decades several institutions have treated UTUC endoscopically, either via ureteroscopic ablation or percutaneous nephroscopic resection of tumour (PNRT), for both imperative and elective indications. METHODS: For evidence acquisition the Pubmed database was searched for English language publications in December 2011 using the following terms: upper tract (UT) transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), upper tract TCC, UTTCC, upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, UTUC, endoscopic management, ureteroscopic management, laser ablation, percutaneous management, PNRT, conservative management, ureteroscopic biopsy, biopsy, BCG, mitomycin C, topical therapy. RESULTS: There are no randomised trials comparing endoscopic management with RNU. Most published studies were retrospective case series (and database reviews), or unmatched comparative studies. There was strong selection bias for favourable tumour characteristics in many endoscopically treated groups. There was variation in medical comorbidity and indication for treatment across different study groups. The biopsy verification of underlying UTUC pathology was inconsistent. The follow-up in most studies was limited, typically to a mean 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of UT recurrence with endoscopically managed UTUC, and a grade-related risk of tumour progression and disease-specific mortality. Overall, renal preservation may be high with ≈20% of patients proceeding eventually to RNU. For highly selected Grade 1 (or low-grade) disease managed in experienced centres, 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) may be equivalent to RNU, although the small study groups and short follow-ups preclude comments on less favourable Grade 1 (or low-grade) tumour characteristics, or DSS, in the longer-term. For Grade 3 (or high-grade) disease, DSS outcomes are poor and endoscopic management should only be considered for compelling imperative indications in the context of the patient's overall life expectancy and competing comorbidity.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Ureteroscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirugía , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BCG/administración & dosificación , Biopsia , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Mitomicina/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Nefrectomía/métodos , Nefrectomía/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uréter/patología , Uréter/cirugía , Ureteroscopía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Urotelio/patología , Urotelio/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA