Impact of the implementation of a Sepsis Code Program in medical patient management: a cohort study in an Internal Medicine ward / Impacto de la implementación del Programa Código Sepsis en una planta de hospitalización médica: estudio de una cohorte de pacientes de Medicina Interna
Bautista Hernández, Azucena; Vega-Ríos, Enrique de; Serrano Ballesteros, Jorge; Useros Braña, Daniel; Cardeñoso Domingo, Laura; Figuerola Tejerina, Angels; von Wernitz Telek, Andrés; Jiménez Jiménez, David; Santos Gil, Ignacio de los; Sáez Béjar, Carmen.
Rev. esp. quimioter
; 35(2): 178-191, abr.-mayo 2022. tab, ilus, graf
Article
in English
| IBECS (Spain) | ID: ibc-205328
Introduction. Sepsis is the main cause of death in hospitals and the implementation of diagnosis and treatment bundles has shown to improve its evolution. However, there is alack of evidence about patients attended in conventional units.Methods. A 3-year retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine units withsepsis were included and assigned to two cohorts according toSepsis Code (SC) activation (group A) or not (B). Baseline andevolution variables were collected.Results. A total of 653 patients were included. In 296 cases SC was activated. Mean age was 81.43 years, median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 2 and 63.25% showed somefunctional disability. More bundles were completed in group Ablood cultures 95.2% vs 72.5% (p < 0.001), extended spectrumantibiotics 59.1% vs 41.4% (p < 0.001), fluid resuscitation96.62% vs 80.95% (p < 0.001). Infection control at 72 hourswas quite higher in group A (81.42% vs 55.18%, odds ratio3.55 [2.48-5.09]). Antibiotic was optimized more frequently ingroup A (60.77% vs 47.03%, p 0.008). Mean in-hospital staywas 10.63 days (11.44 vs 8.53 days, p < 0.001). Complicationsduring hospitalization appeared in 51.76% of patients, especially in group B (45.95% vs 56.58%, odds ratio 1.53 [1.12-2.09]). Hospital readmissions were higher in group A (40% vs24.76%, p < 0.001). 28-day mortality was significantly lower ingroup A (20.95% vs 42.86%, odds ratio 0.33 [0.23-0.47]).Conclusions. Implementation of SC seems to be effectivein improving short-term outcomes in IM patients, althoughtherapy should be tailored in an individual basis (AU)
Responsible library:
ES1.1
Localization: ES15.1 - BNCS
Fulltext