Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Maddux, James T; Wink, Onno; Messenger, John C; Groves, Bertron M; Liao, Robert; Strzelczyk, Jodi; Chen, Shiuh-Yung; Carroll, John D

Maddux, James T; Wink, Onno; Messenger, John C; Groves, Bertron M; Liao, Robert; Strzelczyk, Jodi; Chen, Shiuh-Yung; Carroll, John D.

Affiliation

Maddux JT; Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA. john.carroll@uchsc.edu

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 62(2): 167-74, 2004 Jun.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15170705

Subject(s)

Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging; Equipment Safety; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cineangiography; Colorado; Female; Fluoroscopy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Radiation Dosage; Whole-Body Irradiation

Search on Google

XML

PubMed Links

Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Artery Disease / Coronary Angiography / Equipment Safety Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2004 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Search on Google

XML

PubMed Links