Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pyeloplasty in children: is there a difference in patients with or without crossing lower pole vessel?
Hacker, Hans-Walter; Szavay, Philipp; Dittmann, Helmut; Haber, Hans-P; Fuchs, Joerg.
Affiliation
  • Hacker HW; Abteilung für Kinderchirurgie, Universitaetsklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Tübingen 72076, Germany. hanswalter.hacker@ksl.ch
Pediatr Surg Int ; 25(7): 607-11, 2009 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19504112
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Most of the children with hydronephrosis do not require any surgical intervention. However, in individual cases, irreversible loss of renal function can develop. Predictive criteria have been proven ineffective so far in determining in which children obstruction will lead to renal damage. The aim of our retrospective study was to determine the role of a crossing lower pole vessel (CV) in children undergoing pyeloplasty. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Between 1996 and 2003, 137 patients (age between 6 weeks and 16 years) with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction and no associated urological pathologies underwent Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty. A total of 112 patients were evaluated with complete data. One of the following criteria was considered to be indication for surgery in children with grade 4 hydronephrosis differential renal function (DRF) <40%; clinical symptoms such as pyolenephritis and flank pain; during follow-up renographies, a reduction of DRF >10% and washout patterns II or III b according to O'Reilly. We looked at the age during surgery and the kind of presentation. DRF was measured using diuretic renography preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. A postoperative change in DRF of group A (children without CV, n = 84) was compared to that in group B (children with CV, n = 28).

RESULTS:

Median age at the time of surgery was 5 months in group A compared to 23 months in group B. Only in 21.4% of the children with CV compared to 60.7% without CV hydronephrosis was diagnosed by ultrasound examination antenatally. We found a preoperative DRF of 42.4% +/- 11.2 SD in group A, and of 38.9% +/- 11.7 SD in group B. The percentage of postoperative improvement was 3.3% in group A and 15.4% in group B.

CONCLUSIONS:

Children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and CV received a delayed surgical treatment and showed a greater reduction in differential renal function preoperatively, in contrast to patients without CV. Our data show that CV is a risk factor for deterioration of renal function in children with hydronephrosis and we advocate for an early pyeloplasty in these children, especially if they have a high-grade dilatation and equivocal washout patterns in diuretic renographies. Further prospective studies are necessary in order to understand the natural history of CV and to reveal the importance of the crossing lower pole vessel as a structural anomaly lacking maturation.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ureter / Ureteral Obstruction / Kidney / Kidney Pelvis Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Journal subject: PEDIATRIA Year: 2009 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ureter / Ureteral Obstruction / Kidney / Kidney Pelvis Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Journal subject: PEDIATRIA Year: 2009 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany