Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Verbal autopsy interpretation: a comparative analysis of the InterVA model versus physician review in determining causes of death in the Nairobi DSS.
Oti, Samuel O; Kyobutungi, Catherine.
Affiliation
  • Oti SO; African Population and Health Research Center, P,O, Box 10787 GPO-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. soti@aphrc.org.
Popul Health Metr ; 8: 21, 2010 Jun 29.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20587026
BACKGROUND: Developing countries generally lack complete vital registration systems that can produce cause of death information for health planning in their populations. As an alternative, verbal autopsy (VA) - the process of interviewing family members or caregivers on the circumstances leading to death - is often used by Demographic Surveillance Systems to generate cause of death data. Physician review (PR) is the most common method of interpreting VA, but this method is a time- and resource-intensive process and is liable to produce inconsistent results. The aim of this paper is to explore how a computer-based probabilistic model, InterVA, performs in comparison with PR in interpreting VA data in the Nairobi Urban Health and Demographic Surveillance System (NUHDSS). METHODS: Between August 2002 and December 2008, a total of 1,823 VA interviews were reviewed by physicians in the NUHDSS. Data on these interviews were entered into the InterVA model for interpretation. Cause-specific mortality fractions were then derived from the cause of death data generated by the physicians and by the model. We then estimated the level of agreement between both methods using Kappa statistics. RESULTS: The level of agreement between individual causes of death assigned by both methods was only 35% (kappa = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.25 - 0.30). However, the patterns of mortality as determined by both methods showed a high burden of infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and pneumonia, in the study population. These mortality patterns are consistent with existing knowledge on the burden of disease in underdeveloped communities in Africa. CONCLUSIONS: The InterVA model showed promising results as a community-level tool for generating cause of death data from VAs. We recommend further refinement to the model, its adaptation to suit local contexts, and its continued validation with more extensive data from different settings.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies Language: En Journal: Popul Health Metr Year: 2010 Type: Article Affiliation country: Kenya

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies Language: En Journal: Popul Health Metr Year: 2010 Type: Article Affiliation country: Kenya