Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of cyclic heating on physical property and biocompatibility of α- and ß-form gutta-percha.
Cheng, Ya-An; Huang, Shih-Hao; Hsien, Hsiang-Chi; Chiang, Yu-Chih; Lin, Chun-Pin.
Affiliation
  • Cheng YA; School of Dentistry and Graduate Institute of Clinical Dentistry, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Huang SH; School of Dentistry and Graduate Institute of Clinical Dentistry, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Hsien HC; Dental Department of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Chiang YC; School of Dentistry and Graduate Institute of Clinical Dentistry, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lin CP; School of Dentistry and Graduate Institute of Clinical Dentistry, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: pinlin@ntu.edu.tw.
J Formos Med Assoc ; 113(8): 498-505, 2014 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25037756
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Thermoplasticized techniques with high temperature and repetitive heating in root canal filling may cause degeneration of gutta-percha, producing cytotoxic byproducts and interfering sealing quality. This study was conducted to investigate the influence of cyclic heating on the physical property and biocompatibility of α- and ß-form gutta-perchas. METHODS: Both α- and ß-form gutta-perchas were submitted to two heating processes: continuous heating and cyclic heating. Continuous heating was carried out by heating the samples up to 300°C and 400°C. The samples were then analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry, differential thermal analysis (DTA), and thermogravimetry. For cyclic heating process, samples were heated from 30°C to 200°C for seven cycles and analyzed with DTA and thermogravimetry. For cell adhesion assay, samples were treated (30°C to 200°C, one and seven cycles), submitted to cell culture and examined by scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: Differential scanning calorimetry and DTA indicated that α-form gutta-percha presented a major endothermic peak at 50-57°C, while ß-form gutta-percha showed two major endothermic peaks at 46-50°C and 60-63°C. Total weight loss of ß-form gutta-percha was about 2-fold greater than that of α-form gutta-percha after continuous heating up to 300°C, or cyclic heating for seven times. Scanning electron microscopy showed no obvious difference of cell adhesion on α- and ß-form samples, even with seven cyclic heating or one heating cycle. However, the attachment of the cells to the culture plate (the control) is better than to the gutta-percha samples. CONCLUSION: The increase of heating cycles for α- and ß-form gutta-percha exerts no adverse influence on their biocompatibility. Because the physical property of ß-form gutta-percha becomes unstable when it is heated at over 300°C or subjected to cyclic heating, ß-form gutta-percha may not be recommended for use in thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Root Canal Obturation / Materials Testing / Fibroblasts / Gutta-Percha Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: J Formos Med Assoc Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2014 Type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Root Canal Obturation / Materials Testing / Fibroblasts / Gutta-Percha Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: J Formos Med Assoc Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2014 Type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan