Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers as Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in MCI.
Caroli, Anna; Prestia, Annapaola; Wade, Sara; Chen, Kewei; Ayutyanont, Napatkamon; Landau, Susan M; Madison, Cindee M; Haense, Cathleen; Herholz, Karl; Reiman, Eric M; Jagust, William J; Frisoni, Giovanni B.
Affiliation
  • Caroli A; *Medical Imaging Unit, Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo †Laboratory of Epidemiology and Neuroimaging, IRCCS Fatebenefratelli, Brescia §Department of Decision Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy ‡Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge **Institute of Brain, Behaviour, and Mental Health University of Cambridge, Cambridge ∥Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ ¶Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of Cal
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 29(2): 101-9, 2015.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25437302
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study was to compare the performance and power of the best-established diagnostic biological markers as outcome measures for clinical trials in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

METHODS:

Magnetic resonance imaging, F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography markers, and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale were compared in terms of effect size and statistical power over different follow-up periods in 2 MCI groups, selected from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative data set based on cerebrospinal fluid (abnormal cerebrospinal fluid Aß1-42 concentration-ABETA+) or magnetic resonance imaging evidence of Alzheimer disease (positivity to hippocampal atrophy-HIPPO+). Biomarkers progression was modeled through mixed effect models. Scaled slope was chosen as measure of effect size. Biomarkers power was estimated using simulation algorithms.

RESULTS:

Seventy-four ABETA+ and 51 HIPPO+ MCI patients were included in the study. Imaging biomarkers of neurodegeneration, especially MR measurements, showed highest performance. For all biomarkers and both MCI groups, power increased with increasing follow-up time, irrespective of biomarker assessment frequency.

CONCLUSION:

These findings provide information about biomarker enrichment and outcome measurements that could be employed to reduce MCI patient samples and treatment duration in future clinical trials.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain / Cognition / Alzheimer Disease / Cognitive Dysfunction / Hippocampus Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSIQUIATRIA Year: 2015 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain / Cognition / Alzheimer Disease / Cognitive Dysfunction / Hippocampus Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSIQUIATRIA Year: 2015 Type: Article