Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in soils and groundwater of a U.S. metropolitan area: migration and implications for human exposure.
Xiao, Feng; Simcik, Matt F; Halbach, Thomas R; Gulliver, John S.
Affiliation
  • Xiao F; St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA. Electronic address: xiaox095@umn.edu.
  • Simcik MF; Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
  • Halbach TR; Department of Soil, Water and Climate, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55108, USA.
  • Gulliver JS; St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA; Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Water Res ; 72: 64-74, 2015 Apr 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25455741
ABSTRACT
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) are emerging anthropogenic compounds that have recently become the target of global concern due to their ubiquitous presence in the environment, persistence, and bioaccumulative properties. This study was carried out to investigate the migration of PFOS and PFOA in soils and groundwater in a U.S. metropolitan area. We observed elevated levels in surface soils (median 12.2 ng PFOS/g dw and 8.0 ng PFOA/g dw), which were much higher than the soil-screening levels for groundwater protection developed in this study. The measured levels in subsurface soils show a general increase with depth, suggesting a downward movement toward the groundwater table and a potential risk of aquifer contamination. Furthermore, concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in monitoring wells in the source zone varied insignificantly over 5 years (2009-2013), suggesting limited or no change in either the source or the magnitude of the source. The analysis also shows that natural processes of dispersion and dilution can significantly attenuate the groundwater contamination; the adsorption on aquifer solids, on the other hand, appears to have limited effects on the transport of PFOS and PFOA in the aquifer. The probabilistic exposure assessment indicates that ingestion of contaminated groundwater constitutes a much more important exposure route than ingestion of contaminated soil. Overall, the results suggest that (i) the transport of PFOS and PFOA is retarded in the vadose zone, but not in the aquifer; (ii) the groundwater contamination of PFOS and PFOA often follows their release to surface soils by years, if not decades; and (iii) the aquifer can be a major source of exposure for communities living near point sources.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Soil / Soil Pollutants / Water Pollutants, Chemical / Groundwater / Caprylates / Alkanesulfonic Acids / Environmental Exposure / Fluorocarbons Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Water Res Year: 2015 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Soil / Soil Pollutants / Water Pollutants, Chemical / Groundwater / Caprylates / Alkanesulfonic Acids / Environmental Exposure / Fluorocarbons Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Water Res Year: 2015 Type: Article