Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ACR Appropriateness Criteria pelvic floor dysfunction.
Pannu, Harpreet K; Javitt, Marcia C; Glanc, Phyllis; Bhosale, Priyadarshani R; Harisinghani, Mukesh G; Khati, Nadia J; Mitchell, Donald G; Nyberg, David A; Pandharipande, Pari V; Shipp, Thomas D; Siegel, Cary Lynn; Simpson, Lynn; Wall, Darci J; Wong-You-Cheong, Jade J.
Affiliation
  • Pannu HK; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: pannuh@mskcc.org.
  • Javitt MC; Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel.
  • Glanc P; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Bayview Campus, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bhosale PR; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Harisinghani MG; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Khati NJ; George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC.
  • Mitchell DG; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Nyberg DA; The Old Vicarage. Worcester Park, United Kingdom.
  • Pandharipande PV; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Shipp TD; Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Siegel CL; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Simpson L; Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Wall DJ; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Wong-You-Cheong JJ; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 12(2): 134-42, 2015 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25652300
ABSTRACT
Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common and potentially complex condition. Imaging can complement physical examination by revealing clinically occult abnormalities and clarifying the nature of the pelvic floor defects present. Imaging can add value in preoperative management for patients with a complex clinical presentation, and in postoperative management of patients suspected to have recurrent pelvic floor dysfunction or a surgical complication. Imaging findings are only clinically relevant if the patient is symptomatic. Several imaging modalities have a potential role in evaluating patients; the choice of modality depends on the patient's symptoms, the clinical information desired, and the usefulness of the test. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions; they are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals, and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiology / Urology / Diagnostic Imaging / Practice Guidelines as Topic / Pelvic Floor Disorders / Obstetrics Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2015 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiology / Urology / Diagnostic Imaging / Practice Guidelines as Topic / Pelvic Floor Disorders / Obstetrics Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2015 Type: Article